the problem is not Eugenio Scalfari but man Jorge Mario Bergoglio lacking in prudence and sanity, but it can also be a valuable instrument of God's grace

The man's indiscretions Jorge Mario Bergoglio and our fire service

THE PROBLEM IS NOT Eugenio Scalfari MA MAN WANTED JORGE MARIO BERGOGLIO PRECAUTIONARY AND MENTAL BALANCE, BUT THAT WILL BE TOO VALUABLE TOOL OF GOD'S GRACE

 

.

Among the various events of imprudence of Pope Francis I also is no stubbornness senile to persevere stubbornly to speak with a dangerous person like Eugenio Scalfari, then forcing the official organ of the Holy See to make public figure of useful idiots when they can not say that the Church is now in the hands of a reckless, scrambles to explain that the other person has not understood, or that the meeting was just a private conversation and not an interview. Well wonder, Lords of the official organ of the Holy See: feel - of course is just one example academic! —, that before a crazier monarch King George III Hanover, the best thing to do is perhaps to make fun of the people by explaining to it than are the others to have misunderstood, while he had hopped suit only white nightgown in the throne room to receive the highest dignitaries of the House of Lords on official visit?

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

PDF format Print article

 

 

.

.

dangerous friendships …

Liutprand, bishop of Cremona, in the early tenth century, in his The deeds of the emperor Otto, It contains a phrase attributed to this famous monarch on the young Pope John XII [Rome 937 - Rome 964], elected to the holy throne in the year 955 when he was just eighteen years old, He had this to say:

.

«The boy says, East, good example of an easy unchanged, which translated means: "The Pope is still young and will moderate only by the example of noble men" [read the original text WHO]

.

Since then it has been more than a thousand years, but occasionally the stock history of strange surprises, and in different ways in the form, though similar in substance of different people, unfortunately repeats. And, as he learns Greek wisdom, if the epic beginning was marked by the noble tragedy, the end - or as in our ecclesial and ecclesiastical case the irreversible decline - is instead marked by the satire that everything drowns in the ridiculous. Having said this very: anyone who intends to dissent from this proven matter of historical and social fact, if not take it with me, but with Greek history, the Greeks and their literature. I have limited myself to only bring a fact that no scholar who is really responsible and serious may in any way deny and refute: the decadence always comes to its climax in the sinking satire. Suffice it to think of the periodic scandals of the clergy, and especially those of a sexual nature, with the inevitable theaters of gay priests pinched in situations so incredible in their grotesque absurdity, that not even arouse the indignation, but only laughter, just as if the whole thing was a real comic comedy to laugh, but certainly do not take seriously.

.

Thus, in the satire in which now we have sunk, We were shocked right at the beginning of the Easter Triduum with the words published by the founder of the newspaper La Repubblica, which he attributed to Pope Francis I of the expressions that touch the heart of the mystery of salvation:

.

"Holiness" - Eugenio Scalfari question - "in our previous meeting she told me that our species will disappear at some point and always God from his creative seed will create other species. She never told me about souls who have died in sin and go to hell forever for scontarlo. She talked to me instead of good souls and admitted to the contemplation of God. But the bad souls? Where you are punished?». To this question the Pope would respond: "You are not punished, those who repent and receive God's forgiveness are among the ranks of souls who watch, but those who do not repent and therefore can not be forgiven disappear. There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls " [see text, WHO, WHO].

.

Even the most superficial knowledge of the Catechism of the Catholic Church He understands that in this response are contained serious heresies not formal but substantial. Shortly after the release of the text - with all that this news has led and unleashed the day of Holy Thursday - comes the denial of the Holy See:

.

"The Holy Father Francis recently received the founder of the newspaper La Repubblica in a private meeting at Easter, But not issue him any interviews. As reported today by the author in the article is the result of its reconstruction, where the exact words spoken by the Pope are not cited. No quotation marks in the above article should be considered then as a faithful transcription of the Holy Father's words " [ Official text WHO].

.

Caravaggio: Flagellation of Christ at the Column in the judgment hall of Pilate

Pacific that the patch is worse Snag, given that the umpteenth slap is reached, however, on the face of Christi fideles at the beginning of the Easter Triduum, while the Pope is involved in what - and I say this with no disrespect - we could define how the theater ideological bergogliano better known as the rinsed feet in jail, He made equally to men and women, Christians and non-Christians. On this theater I do not mean to repeat myself, I have already written in the past and in anything but ironic tones [see article WHO]. We need only remember that on this holy day, we priests, we celebrate the institution of the priesthood and the Holy Eucharist; although that day has now been changed by the reigning Pontiff in riot bergogliano pedicure to convict.

.

Unfortunately I consider unnecessary to remind the Pope - as I wrote recently that it is not even a provincial psychology, since belonging to that sub-category of provincialism which is the quartieralismo [see article WHO] - that this gesture in the Gospel of John the Apostle Blessed acclaimed right in Mass of the Lord's Supper [cf. GV 13, 1-15], Christ the Lord is fulfilled on the Apostles chosen as priests of the New Covenant and ministers as stewards and custodians of the Holy Eucharist.

.

Caravaggio: Christ Crowned with Thorns

And while pel joy of the Radical Party members, the logic of which there is the concept of "poor victims of crime", but "poor prisoners that offenses committed them" - all according to the same logic of evil "poor women who have abortions", Never rather "poor children killed by their mothers in abortion" -, His Holiness has again ignored the fact that in his own diocese of Rome there are bishops and priests elderly, sick and severely sick, who have spent their lives to serve the Church of Christ and to be faithful stewards of the grace of the Sacraments. Some are hospitalized, others live in clinical and geriatric facilities because they are no longer independent and therefore need to be well cared for simply move to toilet facilities, admitted there may bear and should not however perform their bodily needs in bed, with the assistance that it requires, and with all the sense of discomfort and humiliation that this entails for any human. Anyhow, what only matters is that the Supreme Pontiff - who immediately hath been said from the other side of the world and that after this announcement has not been slow to start making things of this world -, go to rinse your feet in the giovanottoni in perfect physical health in prison are not for injustice, but because they have committed various crimes; because they used violence against other human beings, robbed people dedicated to honest work, including people who are struggling to come to their families at the end of the month, they sold drugs, They have exploited prostitution, They have committed rapes and so on, and the whole, of course, pace of the Radical Party members who hail the "poor prisoner" and equal pace of the reigning Pope who goes to rinse your feet with these angels of God.

.

We all should be taught the Supreme Pontiff Christ Lord admonishes: "I was in prison and you visited me" [cf. Mt 25, 36]. Christ the Lord does not say at all: "I was in prison and you have washed my feet ', because your feet, Christ gave, has washed them only to the Apostles chosen by Him and by Him consecrated priests of the New Covenant, everything else has to be considered only a sort of modern apocryphal Gospel that we could reasonably owner “The Gospel According to Jorge Mario Bergoglio”.

.

Caravaggio: particularly in the work of the feet Madonna of the pilgrims

It is for it legitimate to ask why, Holy Thursday, The Pope arrived on the other side of the world that seems to yearn for things of this world, to give an example of humility and the spirit of service to which Christ the Lord calls us He first washed the feet of his disciples - and note, his disciples, not to prisoners nor to the whores of Jerusalem -, not adversely instead at some downtown geriatrics to give the parrot for urine or defecate in the pan to a saint Bishop and sick priest who spent his entire life to serving Christ and his Church, certainly not to steal, to rape, cashing in on prostitution and selling drugs as the angels of God made the subject of Liturgy bergogliana the annual flushing of the feet. Having said that I add: man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, come halfway around the world and in fact competed for five years from the things of this world, to his conscience as a man and the Apostles Prince Successor she should asked this question: while he found time and maybe even delight in receiving Eugenio Scalfari, dispensing with it a precious time by God, it went to the Holiness of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I for other purposes well and high missions, how many times he was informed that the Bishops and Priests, including several of its direct and close acquaintance, They were hospitalized, They had been subjected to large and invasive surgeries, or who were in recovery at various rehabilitation centers and so to follow? And how many times, Sanctity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, although informed, It was careful not to pick up the phone - which always makes extensive use and abuse - to extend to them an omen and a sign of the apostolic nearness, just as he did by calling Lucifer even two sons of the caliber of Marco Pannella and Emma Bonino, otherwise inviting them to 'hold on', although it is not known on what the father and mother of abortion, dell'eutanasia, of genetic testing, dell'omosessualismo, of marriage between couples of the same sex and of children given to them for adoption or by the same purchased from wombs for rent, They should and should continue to "hold on"? [cf. WHO, WHO].

.

Caravaggio: the kiss of Judas

All this to prove that for the first time in history we are to deal with a legitimate successor of Peter that is likely to impress all the worst enemies ever the Church and Catholicism, without giving rise to confusion and bewilderment in Christi fideles, while Eugenio Scalfari - and not just him -, praising the Pope revolutionary, in chorus with that other bad person by Antonio Spadaro, that acts as a counterpoint melody to "leader revolutionary" [cf. WHO], both unaware that the concept of "revolution" and "revolutionary" does not apply to the Church and the papacy, I am taken as they are by their dramatic and destructive drift utopian and secularist [cf. John Cavalcoli, o.p, WHO]. Doing so would effectively confine the Church on the one hand, the papacy on the other hand, by patterns and socio-political logic reductive them all worldly, related to a present based on everything at once and not stretched to any eschatological perspective. It was just that two thousand years ago the error of certain Jews, who in Christ they wanted to see the "revolutionary" that would set them free from Roman rule, while much higher was his mission: free them from sin, until it became the Lamb of God who washes the sin of the world [cf. GV 1, 29-34]. Between these, one who saw Christ in a leader of this kind, a revolutionary, a popular leader liberator, but remaining very disappointed to see how he was neither meant to be such, was a character known as Judas Iscariot, a kind of socio-political scientist at the Antonio Spadaro twenty centuries ago, which at least, after having betrayed the Divine Master, He does not put it to launch Tweet rambling and interviews that subvert the basic principles of ecclesiology. Indeed, Judas Iscariot, with a gesture so to speak “consistent” and dramatic hanged himself, which happened because he was a Jew in his own way “consistent” with its complete closure to the grace of Christ's actions, it was not a time-change Jesuit riding high, convinced that this time will never pass, because the so-called "revolution" would rely on to tell them of the "irreversible epochal changes". Recall the poor Spadaro - but passing well to the general of the Society of Jesus, Father Arturo Sosa, He confessed several times amenamente suffering from hives before the rigidity of doctrine [cf. WHO] - that irreversible, in the Church of Christ, They are only those dogmas of faith that today certain Judas would like reversible to better enforce their human dogmas, sometimes even openly evil. All this in the name of their celebrated and brazenly declared irreversible, built on a present moment that must not pass, because it is the everything at once they care, things do not last and eternal. And these, come to think, are the worst forms and expressions of atheism: the cleric atheism.

.

Of the personality of Pope Francis I, to inquietarmi is that its serious lack of caution that only the blind and uncritical supporters of the correctness and opportunities of each of its slightest sigh, They own and do not want in any way to see; as well as, for other reasons far more serious, They do not want to see her courtiers pimps who long coveted career shooting, to arrive at which today are shrouded in poor, poverty, refugees and existential suburbs. And, between the various manifestations of imprudence of Pope Francis I also is no stubbornness senile to persevere stubbornly to speak with a dangerous person like Eugenio Scalfari, then forcing the official organ of the Holy See to make public figure of useful idiots when they can not say that the Church is now in the hands of a reckless, scrambles to explain that the other person has not understood, or that the meeting was just a private conversation and not an interview. Well I ask the Lords of the official organ of the Holy See: feel - of course is just one example academic! —, that before a crazier monarch King George III Hanover [cf. WHO], the best thing to do is perhaps to make fun of the people and to treat it as a set of perfect cretins which explain that only others to have misunderstood, while Her Majesty was presented hopping suit only white nightgown in the throne room to receive the highest dignitaries of the House of Lords arrived on an official visit? You understand him, Lords of the official organ of the Holy See, that such a run of George III in the throne room in her nightgown, What is less crowds and especially less reckless than the stubborn obstinacy by the reigning Pope to want to converse in all ways with a subject like Eugenio Scalfari?

.

Caravaggio: Peter's denial

Let's start by St. Thomas Aquinas, through which we can learn what prudence has its true place that proceeds through an equally precise definition: «Wisdom is the driver of the virtues» [Summa Th. I-II, q.58 a.5]. Prudence is the wagon that hauls all the other cardinal virtues [cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1806], is the mother virtues, the guide and the mother of all how much the moral virtues, in the absence of which none of these virtues can reach that their formal and substantial act which is the rectum virtuous behavior. It is not just the desire to be just and temperate, because it is necessary to grasp and then follow that course of action by which are realized and concretized justice or temperance. Without this action, which is characteristic of prudence understood as driver's virtues and mother virtues, the other virtues would remain only a dead letter, because they could not express themselves, they would just like to express, so they never would reach to consolidate itself in the person making it truly and genuinely virtuous, least of all right.

.

At Aquinas School so we learn that prudence is not only the first among the cardinal virtues, because it, the other virtues, leads them all, since 'Reason connection virtues:». So the virtue of prudence has such natural moral order autonomy. In both orders there is a virtue CONNECTING, ie a virtue that connects all the other, It gives the shape - so to speak - the other virtues. And yet, Aquinas says that in situations regarding the operation, operations, or act, in agilibibus, the form it takes or is apparent from the order. So that virtue which has closer to the ultimate goal of human existence, is the virtue that gives form to the other virtues and connects them to each other [on prudence and access, cf. Tomas Tyn, o.p. Lectures on Prudence, Bologna, 1988].

.

Caravaggio: Behold the man

A man void of reason it therefore behaves in an excessive way, lingering at the humoral and the irrationality. And, lingering in these excesses, the man devoid of reasonableness is unable to moderate and adapt to the measure and to the real, until fall for inevitable and logical consequence of the imbalance and the surreal, because the unreasonable man is always and per se a man devoid of measure, cleaved from the reality and therefore devoid of or poor balance. Sincerely, analyzing the figures and the facts, I fear that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is lacking in balance and that - as I wrote over a year ago - "the true “dubia” are those about his mental clarity, But no one says " [cf. WHO]. And no one says, between the timid clerical army that is rampant in the Church today, even if the facts show that he creates divisions often serious and tragic, It does not offer the People of God certainties, but doubts, the clarity required by the doctrinal language prefer to prefer to interpret ambiguous expressions in both directions, thereby generating heeling in Bishops, Priests and in the body of Christi fideles. Pat the ravening wolves, solidarizes and shows large openings towards the sheep dispersed in the prairies of heresies Lutheran, except then take a beating the faithful sheep remained within the Catholic fold. He is able to say firmly and clearly “and” the “No”, only when it comes to those elements that are now beds within its obsessional neurosis: refugees, migrants, poor ideological and Ecology, while on all other rest, including standards based on the truths of faith, conquer the “perhaps” and finally the worst and most devastating “you do”. He showed to the Islamic world a treat to say the least improvident, He has repeatedly defined Islam as a religion of peace and love, totally ignoring, so dangerously uncritical, ch'esso he born and brought to life by a complex assemblage of mixed messages together by a false prophet, and also ignores the fact that by virtue of the many violent children and murderers who take the moves from this religion of peace and love, all the area surrounding the Vatican City are armored to prevent terrorist attacks. Ignore also that the historic Via della Conciliazione, continuously open from 1929 up to recent days, It was closed to traffic with concrete columns and iron railings placed at its inception to prevent young Islamic fundamentalist, in the name of peace and love, is intende, you branch out with a padded means of explosive charges in the direction of among the people St. Peter's Square, or better between the infidels. Now, because the facts do not liable to easily disproved these are, I wonder: how can we speak of him as a prudent and balanced man? Not to mention human government showing for years now of being able to choose one of the following figures very harmful to the Church, imposing subjects but are part of the so-called "magic circle", or who are unable to enjoy its sympathies without caution and above all the sense of the government by the grace of the Holy Spirit by which, for years, man Jorge Mario Bergoglio would have to cease to be such only and exclusively be the Pope Francis I, faithful a slave of slaves.

.

We want to use in that sense a paradigm also not liable to easily disproved, to clarify to what extent this Pietro has never abandoned its being previously Simone? Soon said: the reigning Pontiff, ignoring or perhaps pretending to ignore that he is, among other things, Also Sovereign Chief of a State with its own square kilometer of land guarantees the precious independence of the Roman Pontiff from any secular political power, in 2014 gives us one of the beautiful pearls renewing - obviously in the spotlight and with photos published and disseminated [cf. WHO] - passport of Argentina (!?) [cf. see WHO]. God bless so if the last election, the citizen Jorge Mario Bergoglio, anagrafe Pope and Bishop of Rome by profession, no person has gone to his country of origin to vote in the presidential elections. And, said this, I think it said more or less everything, from my initial opening engraved: epic tragedy, when you slide into decadence, He always ends up in the satirical grotesque farce. And, sincerely, We clergy have now surpassed the most hilarious pages of ancient Roman satyrs. But, like all fools, we are such and we boast. And, as we try to take us seriously, more audience laughter of us, because it has always, as the ancient theater, nothing is more comical and grotesque buffoon who takes quite seriously. The problem is that if the general public laughs at, the children of the buffoon rather mourn; and cry of pain, to see their beloved and revered father engage in such antics and imprudent, through which it will eventually be entrusted to the harsh judgment of history, as well as perhaps the most severe even God. That's why the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio aroused embarrassment in the faithful but is enhanced by the non-Catholic world and all the worst enemies of the Church of all time: because there is plunging in the satire. It is true that he has stripped the church of its so-called "Renaissance princely trappings", He has stripped the day after day of divine dignity.

.

Caravaggio: Deposition of Christ from the Cross

I which are devoid of any ambition ecclesiastical career and that unlike the dense army of clerics who are silent cowards "cautious" waiting for better times - the rise of which will come to light and then groped the big leap on the bandwagon of new leader, in the hope of profiting from him every benefit and best prebenda -, never cease to grieve for them that, with rare cynicism, giving now finished for this pontificate and patients awaiting the Pope's death, do not realize, both those who aspire to the episcopate future of both those who aspire to the future cardinal, that day after day, the damages caused to the Church, They are becoming more severe. And, if all goes well, more we will move forward on this degenerative state, most take time to only partially repaired this damage, with an aspect ratio more or less like this: compared to five years of ruinous pontificate but these are the result of fifty years of devastating ruin upstream doctrinal, liturgical and ecclesial, it will take five hundred years to remedy this damage that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not the cause, but only the ultimate consequence. Unfortunately,, the irreducible aspiring to the limelight, all this does not take into account, because they are serious and foolishly believe that the next conclave will be enough to close what they call with a rare cynicism as a simple “hiccup”, then turn the page just as if nothing had, and in style. These are the real evil destroyers of the Church, certainly not that poor imprudent man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that of all the previous decades of damage done, It is only the first victim, or as I wrote in the recent past using an allegorical: he is only the last of the customers come in the restaurant and that crossing the threshold was attacked by waiters who demanded from him payment of the accounts of all those before him had had lunch and dinner without pay, but leaving fine suspended accounts.

.

Caravaggio: Mary Magdalene pained

From the Four Cardinal Virtues it is necessary to pass to the three theological virtues, of which I have often had occasion to speak during these last five years, pointing out that although the most important of these is charity, as we learn from the Blessed Apostle Paul [cf. The Cor, 13], at the center of them, between faith and charity, there is hope, task which, in my opinion, It is to combine and mix the other two great virtues. Therefore, in view of the hope that you have to read this pontificate, through which it seems that the Church of Christ alive paralyzed in an eternal Good Friday. This Pontiff and this pontificate have their great utility in the economy of salvation, we do not know yet what, But I am sure that one day, perhaps not far away, understand that even through the humoral and the apparent carelessness of this Pope that manifests itself devoid of balance, God has filled his Church of thanks, He has cleansed and set in the renewal condition for real.

.

None of this, however, can understand those who live day by day, paralyzed in the present, deprived of that great future eschatological perspective that is the hope, that theological virtue that binds together the faith and charity; and that ultimately saves us, even after being plunged into satire, including monkeys playing at the queens and court jesters who think they are the authentic teachers of the Church, or better … of “New Church” born from “irreversible revolutions”.

.

the Island of Patmos, 30 March 2018 – Good Friday

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanksgiving [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

 

About isoladipatmos

3 thoughts on "the problem is not Eugenio Scalfari but man Jorge Mario Bergoglio lacking in prudence and sanity, but it can also be a valuable instrument of God's grace

  1. I agree that, if Providence has sent us as Pope Bergoglio, this has definitely a sense, and I also believe that this could be punishing us for our sins, and to test ourselves in a difficult situation, to see how we process the pontificate bergogliano, without ammutinarci and in any case keeping the bar in the center, with the assistance of the Spirit and remained faithful pastors, example, not adhering so enthusiastic and uncritical to adultery clearance, operated by Bergoglio in his urging Amoris laetitia.

    The other issue related to the teaching Bergogliano, that is raised by the Father Ariel, in my opinion it can also be read as, as many today are asking the question "Can a pope be heretic?”, It should be complemented by a second question, namely "a pope may be insane?”

    About, I mentioned in the past to the fact that the "four" of Bergoglio philosophical postulates in his apostolic exhortation "Evangelii gaudium", They do unfortunately seriously doubt his sanity. You see, about it, the following two analysis, a Father John Scalese:

    http://querculanus.blogspot.it/2016/05/i-postulati-di-papa-francesco.html

    and the other Abbot Giulio Meiattini, OSB:

    http://chiesa.espresso. repubblica.it/articolo/ 1351356.html

    whom I thank for their valuable work.

    Happy Easter to the Father Ariel, all’”Isola”, and to all of you!…

Leave a Reply