The Pope's collaborators and the traitors of the Pope, the limits of tolerability

letters from readers 2

– They say the island of Patmos Fathers –

EMPLOYEES OF THE POPE AND THE POPE BETRAYERS

.

It is better to be faithful to the Pope without special titles, than to occupy an armchair in the Vatican to do the part of Judas in all respects.

.

.

Dear Father John,

about the crisis of faith [see article WHO], I don't discuss the authority of the current Supreme Pontiff, but allow me to respectfully say that - as for authoritativeness and credibility - frankly it seems out of tune, as I read on p. 4 of his text, to put on the same level that giant who was Benedict XVI in his mission, and Pope Francis, whose ambiguity and arrogance, as Spaemann rightly says, they pushed themselves to the limit [see article WHO]. It is also for this reason that I think it is better not to count among the "closest and most faithful collaborators" of the reigning Pontiff ... thinking of non-recommendable figures who really are, like His Eminence Card. Walter Kasper.

I greet you with respect and affection.

Pierluigi (Florence)

.

.

Author John Cavalcoli OP
Author
John Cavalcoli OP

.

.

Dear Pierluigi.

Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe shows from the altar of the Cathedral of Nap
careerism, in’Patmos Island, besides being stigmatized as a plague of the Church, it has also been made the subject of ironies and goodies, such as Father Ariel elected titular Bishop of Laodicea Combusta [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO] and later self-promoted Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples [cf. WHO], complete with its photo-mounted image on the cardinal choral dress of Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe.

Speaking in my article of "Pope's collaborators" [cf. WHO], I meant real collaborators, as for example the Fathers of this electronic magazine The island of Patmos, which I am sincerely, totally and authentically faithful to the papal Magisterium.

.

The pure juridical-material-external fact to play an official role of collaborator, obtained with fraud, adulation and the rise to power, as for example Cardinal Walter Kasper did, it means nothing. It is pure facade, pure hypocrisy, it is a lie. It is despicable … Jesus would have treated him as a whitewashed sepulcher, because things are judged by substance and not by appearance.

.

We must be careful not to let ourselves be fooled by titles and legal coverings, because they can hide the fake. It is not enough, indeed, that there is a label in a bottle “Barolo”, because it contains real Barolo.

.

If an official collaborator of the Pope betrays or falsifies the Pope's Magisterium - and I say the Pope as Pope - be it Jorge Mario Bergoglio or another Pope (in all the Roman Pontiffs are 265), called to be the custodian of the divine Revelation contained in Scripture and Tradition, it's not a collaborator, my a traitor.

.

Those who obey the Pope's Magisterium, as we do, even if he does not have special offices in the Holy See or elsewhere, is the true, reliable, qualified, authoritative and loyal collaborator.

.

It is better to be faithful to the Pope without special titles, than to occupy an armchair in the Vatican to do the part of Judas in all respects.

the Island of Patmos, 20 June 2016

.

.

.

THE LIMITS OF SUSTAINABILITY

.

[…] the Holy Father has a rather hard head and hardly listens to anyone, but if anyone listens, to the test of the facts it listens to the most wrong people, like the ones they recommended, increasingly on the anniversary of the centenary of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, to go on an apostolic visit to Stockholm to take part in the celebrations of the five hundred years of the Lutheran pseudo-reform, which is for us and which remains a heresy for which we have nothing to celebrate.

.

.

Author Father Ariel
Author
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

Father Ariel Caro.

Referring to his latest article [cf. WHO] I was wondering if in front oflinguistic and lexical limitations”, and consequently to some unhappy expressions that make one think of alleged "doctrinal elasticities"Of the man who is Cephas, we need to ask ourselves where Paul is, while recognizing its authority, dare to call him firmly? At least privately, if not publicly. Indeed, the Apostle narrates: «… when Cefa came to Antiòchia, I opposed him openly because he was wrong » [Maybe 2,11]. The Cross of Peter is very heavy and perhaps Francis fully realizes it. That this is the reason why he always asks to pray to his rescue? Also to protect Fr.. Federico Lombardi, held on thorns! Let us pray for them and for us like David in the psalms 15 and 16. Meanwhile, the philosopher Spaemann - friend of Pope Benedict XVI - points out reasonably: "Even in the Church there is a limit of endurability" [cf. WHO].

Hector (Milan)

.

.

Dear Ettore.

Kasper Book your lutero
The truth is that John Paul II, at the suggestion of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, in 1999 he called the then Bishop of Rottenburg-Stuttgart to Rome, Walter Kasper, entrusting him with the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, to keep it under control, avoiding that he continued to foment the worst of Catholicism-Lutheranism in theological faculties and in the German episcopate. Unfortunately,, When in 2013 the leash has been removed and with it also the muzzle, the results were what shine today for all to see.

I who am not easily accused of using random words, at least until not easy proof to the contrary, I seriously begin to fear for the Holy Father i whistles in the square [cf. WHO], precisely because "Even in the Church there is a limit of endurability"; and I fear this limit, that should never be crossed, instead it has been crossed for some time now.

.

The Holy Father defined the Church field hospital, a definition before which I have considered to remember in various of my writings and video conferences that in emergency room of this Hospital we presbyters are there who live in direct contact with the so-called pulse of the situation. And both I and many of my confreres are beginning to be concerned about reasons based on objective data: the faithful complain more and more and in increasingly harsh tones of this pontificate; they complain of this Supreme Pontiff whom he likes so much, too much, to all those people who have always been adverse to the Catholic world and to Christian feeling.

.

This is the situation. And those who live in close contact with the Supreme Pontiff do not inform him of this, if anything, for them to live quietly or for the hope of being able to go from purple to purple-red, they seriously damage the Church and the Successor of Peter, who "should not be flattered but helped", if necessary, even reprimanded, with all due respect to his sacred and inviolable person.

.

What they complain more and more frequently the faithful who were initially enthusiastic about this pontificate, is "confusion", the lack of "clear yes and clear no" instead of which we tend to answer that "maybe it could be yes, but maybe not, according to the case or situation …».

.

A year after the appointment of the new bishops are emerging in various Italian dioceses, in all their devastating reach, the disasters wrought on the pastoral and doctrinal level by very mediocre figures who emulate the Holy Father with nauseating flattery in offering, in speech, in dressing, even in greeting with the raised thumb … [see my previous articles WHO, WHO, WHO]. I know several of these priests elevated to episcopal dignity, I know how much they were raised in bread and Rahner using Hegel as the meter of theological speculation. And I remember very well how much they took pleasure in citing in their homilies or in their catecheses, addressed to adult Catholics brand Dossettian, Umberto Eco's books and Paolo Flores d'Arcais articles published in the magazine of the radical left Micromega; but above all I remember how ferociously they treated the magisterium of Benedict XVI and in what terms they used to define the magisterium of John Paul II as "retrospective" or "anachronistic". And today, one one, we found them bishops. And after spending the years magnifying around the Italian theological studies the book by Hans Küng which questions papal infallibility, today they are capable of attacking anyone who dares to exercise that critical sense recognized by the freedom of the children of God and by the Code of Canon Law itself, for to the Sovereign Pontiff - and go’ I know da, only for them perverse personal gain -, they claim to apply infallibility criteria where they have never been recognized as such by the Church, as well as the same structure of the dogma proclaimed by Blessed Pius IX [see the motu proprio To defend the faith, WHO].

.

I who live in the emergency room of the Church field hospital, I see this every day, I can't report anything other than what I see and hear, that is to say that the faithful are increasingly discontented, as well as bewildered.

.

As for the Blessed Apostle Paul, we can say that in Antioch he faced Peter openly without any problem simply because he did not aspire to become a cardinal. Having said that, another thing must be taken into consideration: if there are any Pauls today - and these could be the test of the facts, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller - unfortunately Pietro does not listen to him, being too busy taking the dangerous theological inaccuracies of the incomplete rector of the Argentine Catholic University, l’Arcivescovo Víctor Manuel Fernández, that it is certainly not that great and noble golden eagle such was Cardinal George Marie Cottier, OP [25 April 1922 – 31 March 2016] theologian of the Pontifical House.

.

The Holy Father is surrounded by the worst of the delinquenzialità of the modernists, of the pro-Lutherans and heretics of the worst done. Add to this that he has a rather hard head and hardly listens to anyone, but if anyone listens, seems to listen to the most wrong people, like those who advised him - and increasingly on the anniversary of the centenary of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima - to go on an apostolic visit to Stockholm to take part in the celebrations of the five hundred years of the Lutheran pseudo-reform, which is for us and which remains a heresy for which we have nothing to celebrate. As for us, the obscene celebratory book on Luther, published a few weeks ago by Cardinal Walter Kasper, remains highly impious and heretical, that in all respects is revealed by the heterodox that it is [cf. John Cavalcoli, OP WHO and my article WHO].

.

The truth is that John Paul II, at the suggestion of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, in 1999 called the then Bishop of Rottenburg-Stuttgart Walter Kasper to Rome, entrusting him with the Pontifical Secretariat for Christian Unity, to keep it under control, thus avoiding that he continued to foment the worst of Catholicism-Lutheranism in theological faculties and in the German episcopate, or that it even favored profanations of the Most Holy Eucharist through the so-called intercomunioni Eucharistic celebrations in Catholic churches with the children of Heresiarch Luther. Unfortunately,, When in 2013 the leash has been removed and with it also the muzzle, the results were those that shine today for all to see, pushing us in this direction to the limits of ecclesial and ecclesiastical endurability, thanks not least to the closest collaborators of the Roman Pontiff, that by now there is no scruple in publicly enunciating heresies, persecuting and marginalizing in a ferocious and coercive way all those who remain faithful to sound Catholic doctrine and the magisterium of the Church; bringing their Catholic-Lutheran and heretical modernist friends to the episcopate who in turn will consecrate as many Catholic-Lutheran and heretical modernists to the sacred priestly order, rejecting all the best and healthy vocations animated by authentic Catholic sentiments.

.

It is the great apostasy narrated in his Apocalypse by the Blessed Apostle John, through which the Church of Christ will have to pass to be purified. This is the reason why we are there “withdrawn” on’Patmos Island, John's last place of revelation; place where the Apostle John wrote the Apocalypse during his exile.

.

the Island of Patmos, 20 June 2016

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Avatar

About isoladipatmos

One thought on "The Pope's collaborators and the traitors of the Pope, the limits of tolerability

  1. Dear Father John,

    “…If an official collaborator of the Pope betrays or falsifies the Magisterium of the Pope - and I say of the Pope as Pope - be it Jorge Mario Bergoglio or another Pope (in all the Roman Pontiffs are 265), called to be the custodian of the divine Revelation contained in Scripture and Tradition, he is not a collaborator, but a traitor”.

    The problem is that if, as you say, an official collaborator of the Pope is a traitor, there are only two cases:
    1. The Pope does not know how to choose official collaborators;
    2. The Pope agrees with his official collaborator.

    In both cases, there is little to be happy about.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters remaining

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.