3
replies
Comments are closed.
The website of this magazine and the editions take name from the Aegean island in which the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse, isola also known as «the place of the last revelation»

«God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»
(in higher than the others, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)

The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma
creator of the website of this magazine:
MANUELA LUZZARDI





Dear father Ariel,
I wanted to ask: Satan and hell, when Christ returns and the day of universal judgment comes, will disappear forever together with the damned. oppure no? The eternity of hell is a dogma of faith, you automatically go to hell if you die in mortal sin? or it really takes obstinacy or despair of salvation like Judas? Then the figure of Judas is re-evaluated by the Gnostics, but what the doctrine of the church fathers says is in real hell? I'd like your opinion.
Thank you
dear fabio
people today, despite having electronic and telematic means available which, if used well, are also extraordinary libraries, they tend to go and drink from writings that are, to say the least, bizarre on matters of doctrine and faith, where everything abounds: catastrophists, the millenarian, dusters of the oldest heresies, not to mention the improvised theologians …
I'll clarify them: this complaint of mine is not addressed to you and your completely pertinent question, it is generally aimed at the large public who reads us.
If you take the Catechism of the Catholic Church, in the part that talks about the profession of faith and the belief in eternal life [see WHO], you will find the doctrine on Hell explained in detail, that is not “in time” nor is it destined to end one day, but it is indeed eternal.
The hell “in time” or not destined to be eternal, it is an ancient heresy, the so-called restoration [apokatástasis]. This erroneous doctrine was spread by Origen who maintained that at the end of time there would be a final re-establishment of all creation with the birth of a state of bliss, given that according to him, the end of time, two kingdoms could not have existed: that of God and that of Evil, because everything would finally be reconciled with love. In the year 553 the Church condemned this doctrine as heretical at the Council of Constantinople.
This eternity must be read from the perspective of what is divine coherence and what is the gift of freedom and free will given by God to man since his creation.
Even if we use the expression “God sends to Hell” O “God condemns to Hell”, this expression certainly conveys the idea, but from a doctrinal and theological point of view it is correct up to a certain point, in the sense that man, in Hell you condemn yourself. It would therefore be more correct to say that God leaves man free to “choose yourself” o di “get hurt” all’inferno, how he left our ancient ancestors free to let corruption enter the scene of the world and of humanity through original sin. The hell, even if to give an idea it is depicted as a place, it is a state of the soul due to man's free choice. And in this state God respects for eternity both the decisions of demons and that of men who do not want to be in communion of love with Him. This is the Hell that begins to become concrete within us from this earthly life.
As regards Judas Iscariot, the discussion is anything but simple and the story does not have a certain answer. Let me explain: none of us can know the judgment given by God to a soul, including the Church. Therefore we can hypothesize or assume that Judas is in Hell because of what he did and how he did it, but we cannot say it, because no one can be sure, this would in fact involve knowing the judgment given by God. We have a moral obligation to tell certain sinners that their actions seriously risk Hell, but none of us, after these have died in a state of mortal sin, can decree that they are definitely and undoubtedly in Hell.
To this kind of response of mine, some people have replied that such and such a mystic has seen, he said and affirmed that … At that point I asked if certain visions of certain mystics or seers were by chance inserted by the Church between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John or if they were elevated to the rank of infallible magisterium. All this to return to the initial discussion of people drinking from the most polluted internet sources …
We know that Judas died by hanging. Science shows us that on average four to five minutes can pass from the moment a man lowers a noose around his neck to the moment of his death.. In four or five minutes, between the soul of that suicide and the grace of God, what can happen? Perhaps someone is able to know and establish how, God's grace, he tried to save that soul?
Proof of this is the fact that today the Church no longer denies funerals to people who die by suicide. First, because many of them may have acted not out of willful and deliberate contempt for life but because they were suffering from various disorders, including the various and serious forms of depression, not always identified in time; but above all because no one is allowed to know if the grace of God has not intervened to save that soul and to grant it the gift of Purgatory.
God's grace will always try to save us until the last breath of life, just as certain men can reject the grace of God until the last breath of their life.
Excuse me Don Ariel, about the visions of Fatima, what do you think? How they should be understood, since they do not fall within the revelation? On the internet you can find the text of a request to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to clarify the content of the third secret (this is the link: http://disputationes-theologicae.blogspot.com/2018/12/segreto-di-fatima.html).
Thank you for your attention and for any clarification you may wish to provide me.