Comments are closed.
The website of this magazine and the editions take name from the Aegean island in which the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse, isola also known as «the place of the last revelation»
«God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»
(in higher than the others, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)
The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma
creator of the website of this magazine:
MANUELA LUZZARDI
“You use your cassock as a weapon or a shield, as needed, instead of the dress she wears. Be serious and post my message, this and what he censored ".
You are a shame of a Catholic, and that's.
A layman cannot dare to address a presbyter in this way. If I were what she paints, the task of recovering and scolding me, if necessary, even to sanction me, it is up to my Bishop, certainly not to an emeritus peasant like her.
Therefore it does not take the place of legitimate ecclesiastical authority, because she has neither the degree of sacramental order nor the power.
And in case my Bishop should decide to scold me, he would call me privately, would never dare, not even him to whom I owe devout obedience and filial respect, throw a shovel of mud at me in the public square as she did, who nevertheless has the presumption of even considering himself an authentic Catholic.
I was pedagogically and Christianly clear?
Dear father Ariel,
I have not argued at all about the Church to which I belong as a baptized person, nor against his shepherds, but against some of them, that is you. And then what does it mean that the shepherds are suffering, perhaps that the laity are not and have no right to be so in the same way? Also I have not argued, but only pointed out the incongruity of such a pontificate from a pulpit who has expressed himself with indecent words towards a bishop on past occasions. But on the other hand, that can be expected from a pastor who turns to myself by giving him something inhuman for free? He realizes what he's saying? She insults because she has no arguments and claims falsehoods (that is, I invent the e-mail address) likewise because it has no arguments. His attitude and his language are worthy of an inhabitant of the Suburra, not of a minister of God. She uses her cassock as a weapon or shield, as needed, instead of the dress she wears. Be serious and post my message, this is what he censored.
I answer her, because we haven't published it: because only inhumane beings like her, self-styled pseudo and unspecified “Catholics”, they may find nothing better to do than to argue about the Church and her pastors who are deeply suffering today, while our Italy has thousands of deaths.
That's why we don't give space to people like her and inhumans like her.
I've been clear?
My message was like “just you that…” And it wasn't full of work, nor anonymous, nor sent from an invented address, nor aggressive. Yet you have not published it!
Dear Father Ivano, I dwell on the Catenaccio, as well as the final paragraph of his article, to note the assumption in it, I hope involuntary, of a style today a lot “ecclesial”: Some Christian faithful… Who ? Dove ? When ?
Let's stop with these generic accusations, full of cryptic metaphors, of polyvalent adjectives, of allusions to plots and deviations, without ever clarifying the object or objective of the accusation from the highest pulpit and cascading from the support pulpits.
Teasing attitude ... which means ? Who teased who, and in what way ? Maybe there really were, but without clarity everyone can think or be wrongly accused, or that others are rightly accused (from his point of view).
Let me give an example limited here: also father Ariel, highly esteemed, in a recent article he made fun of “rosary-spinner”. Because ? With what authority ? Maybe he knows how to recognize, at a distance , skin, Without doubts, a faithful who prays, how can and how he knows, and a superstitious man who poses ? He would call Padre Pio one “rosary-spinner” ?
Indicate the destination, help the intelligences, warm hearts, do not smother the wick with…
Dear Father Ivano,
in the newspaper of the Italian bishops of 15 c.m. The following article has been published:
https://www.avvenire.it/opinioni/pagine/luigino-bruni-oikonomia-10
In it we get to support: “[…] Christianity immediately interpreted the passion and death of Jesus as a sacrifice, like the "lamb of God" that he takes away with his death, definitely, sin from the world. […] The sacrifice of Jesus, of the Son, it would have been the price paid to God the Father to pay off the enormous debt that humanity had contracted. Jesus the new high priest who offers not animals but himself as a sacrifice (Jews 7). This sacrificial theology crossed and marked the entire Middle Ages, reaffirmed by the Counter-Reformation, and still very much rooted in Christian practice today. […] Sacrifice is finally emerging from more recent theology (thanks to a more biblical understanding of the mystery of the Passion), but it is increasingly entering the new capitalist religion. ”
Father Cavalcoli thus replied: https://padrecavalcoli.blogspot.com/p/unoffesa-al-sacrificio-di-cristo.html
According to her, criticize the bishops for that’ item, it means “stand as judge of…
D’accordo, but two points remain.
1. Faith is not simply something “useful”, perhaps to the sick or the weak in general. Without God this world does not go on, simply. Even if the world believes that Christians are poor losers.
And those who want to go to church are not “little ones” stop: they are people who love God. In defining them – as has been done – “little ones” it was implied that whoever does not claim is a “adult Catholic”. We gladly do without it. I “little ones” of Jesus are not opposed to nonexistent “grown ups”.
2. Many priests take advantage of the ban on public masses to not celebrate mass at all, saying that without the people it has no value. This is a colossal heresy but very widespread thanks to today's theologas and seminaries. This point needs to be clarified seriously, authoritative and clear-cut.
To forbid, then, as has been done, even the simple ostension of the Blessed Sacrament, with the excuse that otherwise people gather, frankly very perplexing: there's something not right.
NOT RIGHT OR THAT SOME CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL up attacking SO mocking BISHOPS AND PRIESTS……
you speak just that [CENSORED]
_______________
NOTICE HOW TO APPLY FOR OTHERS
The Editor informs that do not publish any kind of gratuitous insults sent by aggressive people full of hatred hidden behind the anonymity that make e-mail address specifically for this purpose, especially at this time when it would be good to pray and to offer penance to God.