Dirt in public places between sex and theology of the underwear – Dirty in public places between sex and theology of the underpant – Dirt in public places between sex and the theology of Calaconcillo

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

DIRT IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND UNDERPANT THEOLOGY

We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, free the amor Dei, without even asking for the Marchetta. This is why I usually say, in a serious and not at all joking way, indeed with a coherent theological spirit, that, if I hadn't been a priest, I definitely would have been a whore. However, I chose to do one or the other: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

- Church news -

.

PDF Article in print format – Article print format – Printable article

.

.

The State Police responsible for checking the laboratories of public places where food is packaged, a couple of weeks ago it sealed a well-known pastry shop in the heart of the historic center of Catania.

The video documenting the state of the premises is only an archetype necessary to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs and whatever the cost, ready to affirm this:

"… it's true, this video was filmed by the State Police in the center of Catania, in the parlor of the city, but something like this could also happen in the North!».

I open parentheses with an aside: the "could have been" theory reminds me of certain militants of the Left radical chic Italian people who live in the name of politically correct more dreamlike. Those, to be understood, with penthouses in Parioli and villas in Capalbio, that when faced with a girl raped by a gang of illegal North African immigrants they are quick to explain, around the various talk show televisions, that she could also have been raped by a group of Italians. Definitely, to the victim of rape which is almost always destined to leave indelible traumatic marks with all the most complex reactive implications on a psychological and behavioral level, the idea that her rapists could also have been Italians, it will be of great comfort to you, but above all of precious usefulness to overcome a traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I close the aside and return to the topic in question.

This video portrays the laboratory of a historic bar from the center of Catania and not from the center of Bolzano or Belluno, where hygiene and health standards are much higher and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily, it is an incontrovertible fact, regardless of the justifying theory “it could have happened elsewhere”.

Let's move from the hygienic-sanitary question to the doctrinal-moral one, because it was we priests who have obsessed teenagers for generations, as if the whole mystery of evil went strictly and exclusively from the waist down. Who has ever bothered to teach that a laboratory like the one represented here is a much more exaltation of mortal sin than the masturbation of an adolescent in the throes of hormonal storms?? And they don't arise, certain secular bigots, as has already happened several times, to teach the undersigned priest that they are two different things, thus demonstrating that he does not know how serious those sins against charity can be, which according to them, however, would be something else, compared to the deadly sin of adolescent autoeroticism and various falls in the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by five others and then followed by four others, although they are not of interest to these people who appear to be rigorous only in everything relating to the sphere of sexuality.

That we have exaggerated beyond measure on human sexuality, I already wrote it fifteen years ago (see WHO), the rigorous morality of John Paul II prevails, when the Holy Father Francis was still far from coming. Today, the things I stated almost twenty years ago, the Holy Father tells her, often even in ironic tones, lie to me, at the time, the great youthful Paulist moralophobia is in force, it was sung in clear notes: «Take it easy with this talk, or you risk not becoming a priest". I replied: "Sure, because the theology of the underpants always comes before everything and above everything else, vero?».

Five kilometers away from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “holy immediately!”, had the enormous human and moral disaster of the pastry shop of the Legionaries of Christ, presented well on the outside like the windows of this pastry shop in the historic center of Catania, except to hide inside all the worst rubbish of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his faithful accomplices. Being though, the Holy Father and his followers, too busy with the theology of the underpants, certain laboratories were not inspected, even though everyone knew its existence and internal filth.

When in record time, with an imprudence that we will soon pay in the face of history at a certainly very high price, John Paul II was beatified and then canonized, just as the pastry laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered between beatification and canonization, those who had decided to have the saint at all costs immediately declared: «The Holy Father had not been informed, in fact he was deceived". Regardless of the fact that he was informed several times and even in the most dangerous and scandalous details, as a document in one of my books (see WHO), even assuming he had not been informed and indeed deceived, even more so it remains to be clarified: who did not inform him, but above all who would have deceived him? Why deception - except in cases of self-deception -, necessarily involves the existence of a deceiver. So who, deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer.

These are our ecclesial and ecclesiastical pastry workshops, while, without shame and restraint we had nothing better to do than discuss the theology of underwear, beginning and center of the internal mystery of evil. And today, around the social media, we must read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, bigots beyond all limits of human decency, who affirm without penalty of ridicule that the Virgin Mary, a Fatima, to little Giacinta Marto, revealed that many souls were damned for the sins of lust, making her see the damned souls of the lustful in hell.

God deliver us from committed and militant Catholic bigots, because only their perversion and their sexual obsessions can come to believe and then spread as truth and certainty the absurd rumor that the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, started talking about lust and lustful people to an illiterate nine-year-old girl born and raised in one of the most isolated provinces, poor and retrograde of Portugal at the beginning of the twentieth century.

Priests have never liked pant theology always lived in contact with human material, aware of being sinners who by an ineffable mystery of grace have received a mandate from Christ God to absolve sinners from sins according to the ministry of the Church:

«Receive the Holy Spirit; to whom you forgive sins they will be forgiven and to whom you will not forgive them, they will not be remitted " (GV 20, 22-23)

The theology of the underpants is terribly liked by certain lay Catholics social media, behind which often hide frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage nieces who travel with the mattress tied firmly to their backs to be ready for use. But on the other hand it is an old, well-known and well-known story: all of them whores, but only and strictly other people's daughters, certainly not their own.

I see and experience certain things differently: we priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, gratis and love Dei, without even asking for the Marchetta. This is why I usually say, in a serious and not at all joking way, indeed with a coherent theological spirit, that, if I hadn't been a priest, I definitely would have been a whore. However, I chose to do one or the other: the priest and the whore.

From the island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

.

_____________________

DIRTY IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND THEOLOGY OF THE UNDERPANT

We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service offered. This is why I said, seriously and not at all jokingly, but rather with a coherent theological spirit, that if I hadn’t become a priest, I would have become a whore. But I chose to do both: the priest and the whore, for love of God.

- Church news -

.

The Italian State Police in charge of controlling the laboratories of public places where food is packaged, a couple of weeks ago sealed a well-known pastry shop in the heart of Catania’s historic center.

The video documenting the state of the premises is just a necessary archetype to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs, ready to justifier:

«… it’s true, this video was shot by the State Police in the very center of Catania, in the city’s good living room of this sicylian city, but such a thing could have happened also in North Italy!»

I open with a digression: the “it could have been” theory reminds me of certain militants of the Italian radical chic left who live in the name of the most dreamlike political correctness. Those, to be precise, with super-apartments in the rich residential neighborhoods of Rome and villas in the most exclusive areas of Tuscany, who, faced with a girl raped by a gang of illegal North African immigrants, are quick to explain in various television talk shows that the girl could have ended up raped even by a group of Italians. Surely, for the victim of a rape always destined to leave indelible traumatic marks with complex psychological and behavioral implications, the idea that her rapists could also have been Italians will be of great comfort, but more than anything else of precious usefulness to overcome a traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I’ll close this parentheses and get back to the topic at hand.

That this video portrays the laboratory of a historic bar in the center of Catania and not in the center of Bolzano or Belluno, where hygiene and health standards are far superior and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily, is an incontrovertible fact, regardless of the justifying theory “it could have happened elsewhere”.

Let’s move from the hygienic-health issue to the doctrinal-moral one, because it was we priests who for generations have obsessed adolescents, as if the whole mystery of evil went strictly and exclusively from the waist down. Who has ever bothered to teach that a workshop like the one represented in this video is a much more glorification of mortal sin than the masturbation of a teenager in the throes of hormonal storms? And let not these secular bigots rise up, as has already happened several times, to teach the undersigned priest that they are two different things, thus demonstrating that they do not know how serious those sins against charity can be, which to them however would be something different, compared to the the very mortal sin of adolescent autoeroticism and various falls in the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by five others and then followed by four others, although they are not of interest to these people rigorous only in everyhing that concerns the sexuality sphere.

That we have exaggerated beyond measure on human sexuality, I already wrote fifteen years ago (see HERE), when John Paul II’s strict morality prevailed, when the Holy Father Francis very far from reaching Rome. Today, the things I was saying almost twenty years ago are said by the Holy Father, often even in ironic tones, while I, at the time, with the great moralphobia in force under the pontificate of John Paul II, was told in clear terms: «Go easy with these speeches, or you risk not becoming a priest». I replied: «Sure, because before everything and above everything goes the theology of the underpant».

In Rome, five kilometers away from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “saint immediately!”, had the immense human and moral disaster of the Legionaries of Christ’s “pastry”, which looked as good on the outside as the shop windows of this pastry in the old city centre of Catania, except that it hid inside all the worst rubbish of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his faithful accomplices. Being us, however, too busy with the theology of the underpant, certain workshops were not inspected, even though everyone knew of their existence and their dirty interior.

When in record time, with an imprudence that we will soon pay dearly before history, John Paul II was beatified and then canonized, between his beatification and his canonization the confectionery laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered. Those who had decided to have John Paul II declared a saint at all costs, immediately justified this fact by saying: «The Holy Father had not been informed, is was deceived». In reality, the Holy Father was informed several times and even in the most dangerous and scandalous details, as documented in one of my books (see HERE). However, if he really had not been informed and had been deceived, this would be one more reason to clarify: who did not inform him, but above all who deceived him? Because deception – except in cases of self-deception – necessarily implies the existence of a deceiver. So who deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer.

These are our laboratories of ecclesial and ecclesiastical pastry, while, without shame or restraint, we had nothing better to do than discuss the underpant theology, the principle and center of the entire mystery of evil. And today, in the sea of social media, we must read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, bigots beyond all limits of human decency, who affirm without penalty of ridicule that the Virgin Mary, in Fatima, to little Jacinta Marto, baby of only nine-year-old, said that many souls were damned for the sins of lust, making her see damned souls of the lustful in hell.

God deliver us from committed and militant Catholic bigots! Only people obsessed with human sexuality can believe and spread the absurd rumor according to which the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, talking about lust and lustfuls to a little girl born and raised in one of the most isolated, poor and retrograde of Portugal by beginning of the 20th century.

The underpant theology has never pleased priests who have always lived in contact with human matter, aware of being sinners who by an ineffable mystery of grace have received from Christ God the mandate to absolve sinners from their sins according to the ministry of Church:

«When He had said this, He breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you withhold forgiveness from anyone, it is withheld”» (John 20, 22-23)

The underpant theology is terribly widespreadwith some lay Catholics on social media, behind which often hide frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage grandchildren who travel with the mattress tied firmly to their backs to be ready for use. But then again it’s an old and well-known story: all whores, but only other people’s daughters, not their own.

I see and experience certain things differently: we priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service offered. This is why I said, seriously and not at all jokingly, but rather with a coherent theological spirit, that if I hadn’t become a priest, I would have become a whore. But I chose to do both: the priest and the whore, for love of God.

From the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

.

____________________

DIRT IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND THE THEOLOGY OF UNDERPANTS

We priests must necessarily be all whores who try to give ourselves to everyone freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service. That's why I usually say seriously and not jokingly, even with a coherent theological spirit, that if I had not been a priest, I would have been a whore. However, I chose to be both: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

- Church news -

.

Italian State Police, in charge of controlling the workshops and kitchens of public places where food is packaged, A renowned pastry shop in the historic center of the Sicilian city of Catania closed a couple of weeks ago..

The video that documents the state of the premises is just an archetype necessary to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs, at any price, and ready to say:

«…If it is true that this video was recorded by the State Police in the center of Catania, but something like this could also be found in Northern Italy!!»

I open a parenthesis to make a digression: the theory of “could have been” It reminds me of certain militants of the Italian radical-chic left who live in the name of the most dreamlike political correctness. Those who are obviously from the penthouses in the residential neighborhoods of Rome and the villas in the most exclusive areas of the Tuscany region. And those who, faced with a girl raped by a gang of North Africans, rush to explain in different television programs: that the girl could also have been raped by a gang of Italians. Without a doubt, The victim of a rape is almost always destined to retain indelible traumatic marks with very complex reactive implications on a psychological and behavioral level.. The idea that her rapists could also have been Italian would be of great comfort to her., above all, of precious usefulness to overcome the traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I close this parenthesis and return to the topic at hand..

Let the video show the laboratory of a historic bar in the city center of Catania, and not in the center of cities like Bolzano or Belluno where hygiene and health standards are much stricter and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily., It is an incontrovertible fact., apart from the justifying theory of: “It could also happen in other places”.

From the hygienic-sanitary issue let's move on to the doctrinal-moral, because we ourselves priests, who for generations have obsessed teenagers in their intimate movements with their hands; as if the entire mystery of evil were de rigueur and only from the waist down. Who has gone out of their way to teach that a laboratory like the one recorded by the video, It is an exaltation of mortal sin more than the masturbation of a teenager in the midst of his hormonal storms.? And the secular fanatics who do not rise up and reply as has already happened in the past, teaching the priest who writes, which are two totally different things; demonstrating with this, of not knowing how serious sins against charity can be. According to them, They would be something else compared to the super mortal sin of adolescent autoeroticism and falling into the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by another five and followed by four other commandments; although this does not interest these people who are only rigorous in everything that concerns the sphere of sexuality.

That regarding sexuality we have exaggerated beyond all limits, I wrote it fifteen years ago (watch HERE), when the rigorous morality of John Paul II prevailed and the Holy Father Francis was still a long way off. Today the things that I stated almost twenty years ago, The Holy Father says them and often in an ironic tone. While at that time, with the great moralophobia of John Paul II, they told me in clear tones: «Stop talking like that, or you run the risk of not being ordained a priest". I then replied saying: "It's true, because above all and before all is the theology of underpants..

Five kilometers from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “holy immediately!”, had the enormous human and moral disaster of “pastry laboratory” of the Legionaries of Christ, excellently presented on the outside like the pastry shop windows in the historic center of Catania, except hiding inside all the worst garbage of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his loyal accomplices. But the Holy Father and his collaborators were too busy with underpants theology, while certain laboratories were not inspected although everyone knew of their existence and their internal dirt..

When in record time and with a recklessness that we will soon pay in history with a very high price, John Paul II was beatified and later canonized. And during his beatification and canonization, the laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered.; for it, those who had decided to immediately obtain the saint at all costs declared: «The Holy Father had not been informed, On the contrary, he had been deceived.". Regardless of the fact that it was reported on several occasions and even with dangerous and lurid details as I have documented in one of my books (watch HERE) even, assuming that he had not been informed but on the contrary deceived, with all the more reason it should be clarified: Who wouldn't have reported it but above all, who would have deceived him? Because deception – except in cases of self-deception – necessarily implies the existence of a deceiver. Therefore, who deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer..

These are our ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical pastry workshops, while without shame or restraint we had nothing better to do than discuss the theology of underpants, beginning and center of all the mystery of evil. And today on social networks, we have to read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, fanatics beyond all the limits of human decency, who affirm without shame of ridicule: that the Virgin Mary in Fatima revealed to the little midwife Giacinta Marto that many souls were condemned for the sins of lust, showing the condemned souls of the lustful in hell.

God save us from committed and militant Catholic fanatics, because only their perversions and sexual obsessions can come to believe and spread the absurd rumor that the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, spoke of lust and lustful people to an illiterate nine-year-old girl born and raised in one of the most isolated provinces, poor and backward in Portugal at the beginning of the 20th century.

Underpants theology has never pleased priests who have always lived in close contact with human matter, conscious of being sinners and that by an ineffable mystery of grace, have received the command from Christ God to absolve sinners of their sins according to the ministry of the Church:

Receive the Holy Spirit. Whom you forgive the sins, they will be forgiven; and those who do not forgive, they will be left unforgiven. (Jn, 20,22-23)

The theology of underpants certain lay Catholics terribly like it on social networks, behind which they often hide, frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage nieces traveling with the mattress firmly strapped to their backs, ready for use. But on the other hand, It's an old and well-known story: all whores, but only other people's daughters and certainly not their own.

I see and experience some things differently.: We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service. That's why I usually say, seriously and not a joke, even with a coherent theological spirit, that if I had not been a priest, I would have been a whore. However, I chose to be both: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

From the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

The Possum is unaware that a nun can easily become governor of the Vatican City State, as Giulio Sacchetti already was

THE OPOSSUM IGNORE THAT A NUN CAN QUIETLY BECOME GOVERNOR OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE, As already was Giulio Sacchetti

This poisonous speck, in his daily dose of poison he returns to take it out on lay men and women to whom certain offices are entrusted, starting with Sister Raffaella Petrini, whose appointment as governor has been announced

– The briefs of the Fathers of the Isle of Patmos –

(at the bottom of: All articles)

Author Teodoro Beccia

Author
Teodoro Beccia

.

Together with the anonymous Prayers of its phantom editorial team, today theOpossum he thunders against Sister Raffaella Petrini, Secretary General of the Governorate of the Vatican City State, silencing her, among the various, that she is "known to the Governorate for her proud and self-confident attitude" (cf.. WHO).

However, to us Fathers of the Island of Patmos the exact opposite appears to be the case: Sister Raffaella has already been appreciated in the past for her great abilities and her balance at Propaganda Fide, leaving an excellent memory of himself in that department.

This poisonous speck who fears himself as the greatest expert in canon law and Vatican law - “skills” rigorously exercised on a Gossip blog&Poisons outside the walls of the small City State where he is not exactly a welcome person, except to state "we in the Vatican... here in the Vatican..." -, in his daily dose of poison he returns to take it out on lay men and women to whom certain offices are entrusted, starting with Sister Raffaella, whose appointment as governor has been announced.

The appointment of a woman as prefect of a dicastery and that of a woman as governor of the Vatican City State, they are two totally different issues that have no connection whatsoever between them. In the first case, as I will shortly explain in a long legal article of mine, we are faced with an office that necessarily requires the figure of a minister in sacred, as can already be seen from its name: Dicastery for religious; in the second case, instead, we are faced with an office of a purely political-administrative nature, without any kind of religious and hierarchical-ecclesial implications.

archive photo, 1960, in the center in front of the chairs carrying the Supreme Pontiff John XXIII Don Giulio Sacchetti marquis of Castelromano, named in 1968 governor of the Staro of Vatican City by the Supreme Pontiff Paul VI

L'ignorantissimo Opossum who with complete ease bestows titles such as "idiots" on ecclesiastics and laypeople, "Incapaci", «incompetent», «unresolved bankruptcies» … forget that for over three decades (1968-2001) President, or so-called governor of the Vatican City State, fu Don Giulio Sacchetti marquis of Castelromano, a married layman and father of several children, extraordinary servant of the Church and the Papacy. So? Already, I forgot: «… we in the Vatican... here in the Vatican..."

Velletri of Rome, 20 January 2025

.

Our previous articles on the Band of the Silerian:

– 16 August 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And that word taboo that he just can't pronounce: "HOMOSEXUALITY" (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 August 2025 — There is a homosexual? AT THAT TIME I CAN'T BE SILENT Also defends the indefensible (To open the article click WHO)

– 29 March 2025 — Always about I CAN'T BE SILENT: DAL “Vertical man"A" Fireculo "and" quadhow "of Leonardo Sciascia (To open the article click WHO)

– 21 March 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And the story of that convinced seamstress that he can give Giorgio Armani high fashion lessons (To open the article click WHO)

– 12 February 2025 — The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessions OF SAINT AUGUSTINE (To open the article click WHO)

– 15 January 2025 — AT THE CLERICAL BORDERS WITH REALITY: THE WOMAN SUFFERS FROM FREUDIAN PENIS ENVY, The Opossum of the envy by Matteo Bruni Director of the Press Room of the Holy See (To open the article click WHO)

– 20 January 2025 — THE OPOSSUM IGNORE THAT A NUN CAN QUIETLY BECOME GOVERNOR OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE, As already was Giulio Sacchetti (To open the article click WHO)

– 22 November 2024 — THE EPISCOPAL APPOINTMENT OF RENATO TARANTELLI BACCARI. WHEN YOU ARE AFFECTED BY LIVER CANCER, THEY CHARGE ON THE ATTACK THOSE WHO CANNOT BE SILENT (To open the article click WHO)

– 31 May 2024 — A NOTE FROM FATHER ARIEL ON THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT: «AS ANNOYING AS A SEA URCHIN INSIDE YOUR UNDERPANTS» (To open the article click WHO)

– 8 December 2023 — WHO IS MARCO FELIPE PERFETTI REFERRING TO STATING FROM THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT «HERE IN THE VATICAN… WE IN THE VATICAN…», IF YOU CANNOT EVEN SET FOOT IN THE VATICAN? (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 October 2023 — THE ARCHABOT EMERITUS OF MONTECASSINO PIETRO VITTORELLI HAS DEAD: CHRISTIAN PIETY CAN ERASE THE SAD TRUTH? (To open the article click WHO)

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

From the mitred Abbess of Conversano to the Prefect Sister of the Dicastery for Religious

From the submachine gun of Conversano to the prefect of the Dicastery for the religious

The tendency to separate the powers of order and jurisdiction is based on many pontifical provisions of the past, who have endorsed government acts without the power of order, For example, the government of some abbeys from the Middle Ages to modern times, or some bishops who have ruled diocese without being ordered.

– Theology and canon law –

Author Teodoro Beccia

Author
Teodoro Beccia

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

The 6 last January, solemnity of the epiphany of our Lord Jesus Christ, Sister Simona Brambilla, So far secretary of the Dicastery for institutes of consecrated life and the apostolic life companies, He was appointed prefect of the same Dicastery by the Supreme Pontiff Francesco.

Sister Simona Brambilla was secretary of the Dicastery from the 7 October 2023; second woman to hold this assignment after the appointment in 2021 of Sister Alessandra Smerilli to the Dicastery for the service of full human development. The Roman Pontiff has chosen as a pro-prefect of the dicastery Ángel Fernández Artime, 65 year old, Created Cardinal in the Consistor of the 30 September 2023. With this appointment, relaunched in a whale by world printing agencies, The Pope intended to create an unprecedented managerial structure at the Dicastery for the institutes of consecrated life and the apostolic life companies, appointing a prefect nun and a pro-prefect cardinal.

In perfect logical consistency with the actions of the Roman Pontiffice, This choice only follows the furrow marked by the reform of the Roman Curia already present in the Constitution Preach the Gospel, However, it deserves to be clarified from a legal and theological point of view. An initial example can help us introduce the theme and then clarify the problem. Previously, already last 9 January 2023, The pontiff had appointed a new Territorial abbot dell 'Montecassino abbey, headed by the oldest monastic community of the West. Although not consecrated bishop, The abbot Cassinense - or to be precise the Arciabate - receives the nature of the office All the faculties of government of a bishop. Nothing new except for the fact that the pontiff has chosen to promote the office of abbot, Elective by its community in itself, a secular monk not constituted in the sacred order of the presbyterate, then ordered priest only after the abbey appointment.

Without wanting to enter into the merits of the discussion about the opportunity of a papal appointment for a position that More usual provides an election, It is necessary to analyze complementarity, o meno, Between order power and power of jurisdiction. Re -evaluating the ancient theological tradition, Eastern and Western, Vatican II has put the emphasis on the unit of the «Community power», even without wanting to take a position on the ecclesiological value of the distinction between the power of order and that of jurisdiction introduced by the canonistic before the twelfth century. Exist, indeed, theological elements that orient towards a unitary conception of the power, or: The principle of sacramentality of the episcopate referred to in can. 129 § 1 C.J.C.

There are two powers in the church, left by our Lord Jesus Christ, and two hierarchies that derive from it, which cross and overlap in part, but that remain distinct in their attributions and sources. The first of the two is the the power of sanctifying, which is received and exercised through the sacrament of the order in its various degrees (Ministries established, priesthood and episcopate: and Er Bishop means who received episcopal consecration), and which mainly consists in the power to consecrate the Eucharist e, through this and the other sacraments, give grace to souls. Since the source of this power is a sacrament, The direct author is our Lord himself, ex-works operated: The ministers are only the tools. The highest act of this power is the consecration of the body and the blood of Christ. In this, Bishop and priest, they are the same. The power to governing, or power of jurisdiction, which includes in itself the spiritual power to govern and teach (In fact, it is legitimately taught and with authority only to their subjects). If we consider the Church as company, according to classic law, It must have an authority capable of legislating and guiding, as well as punishing and correcting. This power, that our Lord equally owns to the supreme degree, He is transmitted directly by him only to the successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter at the time of the acceptance of the election, and transmitted by him in various ways to the rest of the Church. It has no link in itself with the order power, although generally the two powers convince the same subjects, or even, as for the pope and diocesan bishops, There is a moral obligation to bring together the two powers. In this sense, Bishop is the one who received the power to govern a diocese from the Pope.

This doctrine on the distinction of origin of the two powers It is taught without ambiguity possible in an impressive amount of magisterial documents: last among them the encyclical Mystical body Pius XII (1943), resumed in the following To the Chinese nations (1954) e To the Prince of the Apostles (1958). The bishops govern their diocese in the name of Christ, «That's still when they do, Don't complete their self-jorisunt, However, under the authority of the Roman Pontiff, Despite the ordinary jurisdiction control, Immediately with the same Pope apart» (“However when they do it, they do not do it by right at all, but placed under the due authority of the Roman Pontiff, although they enjoy an ordinary jurisdiction power, Given them immediately by the Pontiff himself ") (DS. 3804). The only one in the world to receive this power of jurisdiction directly from God is the Roman Pontiff, As the Code of Canon Law of the 1917 al can.109:

«Those in ecclesiastical hierarchy collected […] The steps of the power of the order of the ordination; in the highest pontificate, ipsometjure Divine, Fulfilled condition of legal election of the same as acceptance; in the remaining steps of jurisdiction, Canonica Mission» («Those who are counted in the ecclassic hierarchy […] they constitute in the degrees of order power with the sacred ordination; in the supreme pontificate, For the same divine law, completed the conditions of the legitimate election and acceptance of this; In the remaining degrees of the power of jurisdiction, with the canonical mission ").

Not even the Roman Pontiff receives this power from episcopal consecration, but regardless of it. Throughout history there was therefore a broad, complex and sometimes controversial reflection on the relationship between the power of orders, that is received with ordination and that allows you to administer some sacraments - how to preside over the Eucharist - and the power of government, who gives authority on a part of the people of God, like a diocese, a religious order or even a parish. For a long time it was believed that the two powers were distinct and that it was possible to exercise them separately; San Tommaso d'Aquino also shared this position.

As for the Roman Curia, It was believed that all those who carried out their service received their power directly from the Roman Pontiff, which conferred the authority regardless of whether they were ordered or not. This also applied for the cardinals, whose authority derived from the papal creation and not for the sacramental way. This approach has characterized the history of the Church for a long time, so much so that there were cardinals who were not priests, For example the cardinal Giacomo Antonelli, Vatican Secretary of State from 1848 al 1876, had been ordered deacon, but it was not a priest. Further back in time, There were cardinals appointed at a young age who received orders only after a long time, And even Papi who were only diachons at the time of their election to the papal throne.

Some abbots of the past they had not even been ordered priests and ruled an ecclesiastical district, Or there were figures that are at least anachronistic but that responded to this logic, like the elected bishops who ruled diocese without having received the episcopal consecration but only by virtue of their election, this problem to which the Council of Trent will end through the obligation of the residence. Other examples are the so -called machine guns, "Women with the pastoral stick", of which we will mention to follow.

Over time another approach has emerged that dates back to the church of the first millennium: The power of government is closely linked to the sacrament of the sacred order, so it is not possible to exercise one without the other if not within certain limits, which are rather restricted., in 1962, with the motu proprio With the most serious he decided that all cardinals should be ordered bishops

This is the approach of Vatican Council II, who finds himself, eg, in the dogmatic constitution The light to n. 21, in Explanatory note to n. 2, and in the two codes of canon law, the Latin one of the 1983 and the eastern one of the 1990. In the III Chapter (NN. 18-23) and in Note the preliminary It is argued that episcopal consecration is a source of government power and not only of order power, leveraging the sacramentality of the episcopate. For the Council of Trento, indeed, The priesthood conferred by Christ to the apostles and their successors is said to be "power […] to consecrate, offer and administer his body and blood, In addition to putting back and considering sins " (DS 1764); In particular, the bishops "who succeeded in place of the apostles […] are superior to priests, and can administer the sacrament of confirmation, Order the ministers of the Church, and perform many other things " (DS 1768). Here are the effects of the ordination such that they are described to us by the Council of Trento: a power linked to the physical body of Christ and the administration of the sacraments, and absolutely not to the external government of the Church. The light states that episcopal consecration "also confers, with the office to sanctify, offices to teach and govern, which however, by their nature, they cannot be exercised except in hierarchical communion with the boss and with the members of the college ".

Whoever is validly consecrated bishop owns, second The light, both powers; The Supreme Pontiff intervenes only to determine the exercise of government power, not to confer it. In the absence of this intervention of the Pope, We do not know if the exercise of jurisdiction would be disabled or only illegal: the Note the preliminary he says he does not want to enter the matter, even if it can be assumed that it would be only illegal, as for the order power. Moreover, according to the n. 22 The episcopal consecration would also have the entry into the Episcopal College, body that second The light would have the supreme power next to that of the Pope alone: the Note the preliminary specifies that this subject of universal power always exists, but that comes into action only when the Pope calls him. The same number 22 He says that the hierarchical link is also needed to belong to the college, However, it is not clear whether this is a real cause of belonging to the college or a simple condition. The power of government, which beyond the sacramental order, It would be the effect of the sacrament ex works operated, therefore of the Christ directly, as well as belonging to the said college, that despite being the subject of the supreme power When Peter and under Peter, It would remain a subject distinct from Pietro Solo and would receive the power he exercises not from Petro ma of Christ, as it appears clearly from the same Note the preliminary.

Vatican II has authoritatively reiterated that the episcopate is a sacrament and that with the episcopal consecration we become part of the Episcopal College which together with the Pope and under his authority, It is the subject of the supreme power over the whole Church. This thesis is clearly difficult to reconcile with the Dictation of the Vatican I, that condemns

«[…] those who say that this primacy was not given immediately and directly to Blessed Pietro, but to the Church and through this to him as Minister of the Church itself ".

Different thesis from what he then prevailed in The light: Here the subject of the supreme power is one, the college, although it is not excluded that the Pope can act only. The echo of this thesis is also felt in the number 22 Of The light, When it is said that the Pope exerts power to two titles: By virtue of his office and as head of the college. It is therefore admitted that at least in some cases the Pope is only the representative of the college.

This reflection He finds himself in the two reform documents of the Roman Curia who followed the Second Vatican Council: The Constitution Regimines of the universal of Paul VI (1967) the A Pastor Bonus of John Paul II (1988). John Paul II outlined the Curia in congregations and pontifical advice, that in secular terms could be defined as “Ministries with wallet” e “ministries without portfolio”.

Congregations had to be governed by cardinals because they participated in the decisions of the universal Church with the Pope, so, their leaders, They had to have the rank of first councilors of the Pope. Pontifical advice, instead, they could also be guided by archbishops, But in any case by ministers ordered because they had to be in relation to collegiality with the bishop of Rome - that is, the Pope.

Canon law distinguishes the power of government in three categories: the legislative power due to which they are implemented, General decrees and privileges; the executive power that allows to put in place general executive decrees, Singular administrative instructions and acts and on the concession of the competent Legislative Authority General Decrees and Privileges; the judicial power that allows the sentences and the related preparatory documents to be implemented.

In state systems the principle of separation of the powers exists which allows to start again the government functions (parliament, government, courts) so that (Locke-Montesquieu) their exercise is free from mutual influences. In the canonical system there is the principle of the distinction of the powers and therefore of their unity. The three functions are annexed to both universal and particular capital offices. However, alongside them, the canonical system provides for further offices in which people or colleges are titled to which only one of the aforementioned authorities is annexed. The distinction between the power does not aim to limit the exercise of each towards the other but allows to identify acts of a different nature so that the common good of the Church is promoted.

The organization of the Church is based on the principle of the hierarchy of the offices, many of which are not qualifiable as government offices, as it is not endowed di power to govern. When the power of government is annexed to an office, qualifies as ordinary, distinct from that delegate because it is given directly to the person by mandate, without attribution of a specific office.

Ordinary power can be proper or vicar. In the first case it is exercised in “own name” by the owner; It is Vicar if it is exercised by a person who acts on behalf of the owner of the office. Universal level, The offices to which an ordinary power or vicar is annexed are: Roman Pontiff, Episcopal College, The Congregations of the Curia, The Pontifical Council of the Lays, 1 apostolic tribunal. Particularly I am: The diocesan bishops and the leaders of the abbey or territorial prelatures, The Vicars and Apostolic Prefects, apostolic administrators, Personal ordinary (except those for the Anglicans), ordinary of personal prelature, general vicars, episcopal and judicial, pastors; metropoly, particular councils, Episcopal conferences and their permanent advice; The superiors and chapters of the religious institutes and clerical societies of apostolic life of papal law.

The can. 134 §1 attributes the qualification of ordinary to the owners of three different offices: The office that is characterized by the entire power of government (legislative, executive and judicial), Roman Pontiff, Diocesan and equivalent bishops; The office characterized by ordinary Vicar and executive power (general and episcopal vicars of the diocese); Offices attributed to the major superiors of the religious institutes and the apostolic life companies. The same can. 134 §2 attributes the legal qualification of ordinary of the place to the first two types of ordinary. The qualification of ordinary of the place is linked to the territorial character of the ecclesiastical circumscriptions.

Delegated power is distinct from ordinary power because it is entrusted to the person (can 131), as an owner of an office but not as an integral part of it. In this case, the power is limited to the faculties assigned to the person through a delegation mandate. Both the Roman Pontiff and the bishops can, by delegate, expand the faculties of an diocesan bishop or a vicar beyond those acquired by office. Hence the difference between the two authorities. The ordinary one is objective, it exists in itself independently of the person who only has to possess the requirements defined to receive the office; The second depends on the choice of a titular subject who decides to grant a part.

The apostolic constitution Preach the Gospel, with which the Supreme Pontiff Francesco reformed the Curia in 2022, It has substantially devoted from this legal and theological approach. It is no longer distinguished between congregations and pontifical advice, which are all called dicasteries; There is no more difference on who can be the head of the dicastery, A charge that can therefore also be conferred on a lay. However, in presenting the reform of the Curia the 21 March 2022, The then Father Gianfranco Ghirlanda S.J. - Created Cardinal by Somamo Pontiff Francesco in the Constoror of 27 August 2022 - He explained that there were still some dicasteries in which it was appropriate that it was a cardinal to guide them and he pointed out that the "Constitution does not repeal the Code of Canon Law, which establishes that in issues concerning clerics are the clerics to judge ". This is the center of the question: There are offices that can only be exercised for papal appointment or there are offices that, despite the papal appointment, they can only be exercised if you have ordered?

The question emerges when a pro-prefect cardinal supports a prefect nun. The dicastery for institutes of consecrated life and the apostolic life societies has different skills, which are generally government acts that can be exercised without priestly ordination. But the same dicastery, It is often called upon to manage and resolve problems that concern ordered clerics bosomes. It was probably thought that these decisions can be managed, residually, from at least one member who has received the sacred ordination, to be joined to the Prefect. For this the figure of the pro-prefect was created, which, however, seems to be used improperly. The document Preach the Gospel It describes two pro-prefects which are the head of the two sections of the Dicastery for evangelization. This is because the two pro-prefects guide the sections of the dicastery "in place" (that is, pro-) of the pope, which is considered the prefect of the dicastery.

In other cases it has been appointed pro-prefect a prelate who did not yet have the degree to formally cover the charge. For example, When Angelo Sodano was appointed Vatican Secretary of State on December 1st 1990, It was still an archbishop. It was therefore appointed pro-state of state because the Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus provided that the Secretary of State was always a cardinal. Sodano maintained the title of Pro-Sangrento di Stato up to the Constoror of the 28 June 1991, When Cardinal was created and formally assumed the title of Secretary of State starting from 1 July 1991.

However, the pro-prefect Ángel Fernández Artime is already a cardinal and does not exercise jurisdiction instead of the Pope. If anything, he works alongside the prefect nun. Its role is more than anything else that of co-prefect, So it remains to be seen if the Holy Father will appoint a secretary for the Dicastery to understand the definitive organization chart. The choice to support an ecclesiastical to the Prefect reflects the Modus Operandi of some religious orders, who have their "brothers" to their guidance (consecrated lay people), but who are appointed alongside figures with sacramental authority. The Supreme Pontiff would therefore have chosen to follow a road already traveled by the religious congregations for the government of the Church. It is not new. Even the Holy Father Francis, eg, intervened in the government crisis of the Order of Malta proper to order as if it were only a religious and monastic entity, Authoritatively imposing the new constitutions in September 2022 and establishing that the Roman Pontiff must confirm the election of the Grand Master.

Also the Council of Cardinals, established by Pope Francis at the beginning of his pontificate in 2013, It resembles the General Council which supports the Government of the Jesuit General. Many of these settings are given by the main legal councilor of the reigning pontiff, Cardinal Gianfranco Ghirlanda, Jesuit too, who personally followed the reform of the Order of Malta and the Reform of the Curia, In addition to various other reforms, like that of the statutes of the legionaries of Christ.

The Holy Father Francis established an innovation in the Roman Curia abandoning the criteria of the government of the Curia in favor rather than those of religious congregations. We are faced with a small revolution, or simply to an improper use of the terms that could cause serious confusion? We know that the position of pro-prefect of the Dicastery for the institutes of consecrated life and the apostolic life companies is not foreseen by the Constitution Preach the Gospel. It has not been specified what the relationship of powers and competences will be between the new prefect and the pro-prefect. However, talk about a subordination relationship with a cardinal who would be the “second capable” of the Prefect does not seem a correct reading.

The distinction between order and jurisdiction It is the result of a reflection, Duration almost a millennium, aimed at solving two fundamental problems: that of the validity of the sacramental acts placed by the ministers, who had broken with ecclesial communion; that of the validity of absolute orders, who prevailed in the practice of the Latin Church despite the prohibition of the Council of Calcedonia. The question did not concern so much the possibility that an excommunicated bishop could be placed at the head of a diocese, but rather that he could continue to administer the sacraments, Until Graziano and i decideisti they did not progressively be able to distinguish two powers in the activity of the ministers: a power of order and a power of jurisdiction, different both for the transmission mode and for their stability and function. And all in all the Constitution Preach the Gospel proceeds precisely on this track of the distinction: Implicitly assumes the option not to consider the sacrament of the order as the origin of the power of jurisdiction, but to attribute it exclusively to missio canonical given by the Roman Pontiff, that would thus confer a delegation of his own powers to anyone who exercises a function of government in the Roman Curia and in the Church, whether or not it is ordered.

The most debated question It seems to be the exercise of the authority of jurisdiction in the extra-subacramental sphere. Outside the sacramental sphere, the code of 1983 seems to consider, at least from the terminological profile, the opportunity to jurisdiction as a power that has its own material content, distinct from that of the the power of the order. The code uses two different terms: the term «capacity» in the sacramental sphere, and that of «power» In the extra-sub-empathy sphere, almost like giving two different meanings to the same power of jurisdiction, one formal and one content, according to whether it operates in the first or second area. As for the reform of the Curia, It seems to present a radical revolution within the system, a sort of underlining of the application regarding the origin of the power of jurisdiction: understand if it is a divine will (immediate) inscribed in the sacrament of the order that bases the powers of sanctifying, teaching and govern or is rather a determination of the Church (mediated) conferred on the successor of Pietro by virtue of his mandate as a universal pastor with the special assistance of the Holy Spirit.

The tendency to separate the powers of order and jurisdiction is based on many pontifical provisions of the past, who have endorsed government acts without the power of order, For example, the government of some abbeys from the Middle Ages to modern times, As in the well -known and famous case of the Badassa di Conversano, defined Monster Apuliae, or some bishops who have ruled diocese without being ordered, or even some licenses granted by the supreme legislator to simple priests to order other priests without being bishops. The list of facts that show how the government power could not intrinsically depend on the order power could be lengthened, but rather from another source, which is then identified with the missio canonical conferred by the Roman Pontiff. The new Constitution would perhaps be beyond the can. 129 §2 C.J.C., That is, it would fully interpret that collaboration of the laity in the exercise of the same power of jurisdiction. Starting from this observation, The core of the matter can lead to what regulates the relationships between the nature of the Church as a divine-human institution and the government structures that allow it to fulfill her mission at the service of the salvation of the world. It can therefore be said that ecclesial communion involves a hierarchical dimension that corresponds to the trinitarian mystery as it is revealed to us. Everything so far said, albeit in an extremely synthetic way, would lead to saying that the power of jurisdiction does not depend exclusively on the power of order.

One thing we can say with abused security: the appointment of a nun to the office of prefect (that, It would remain as a nun subjected to his religious direct superior but, at the same time, hierarchically “superior of his superior”, with concrete risk of short circuit skills) and the contextual appointment of a cardinal to the office of pro-prefect, It does nothing but confirm the stylistic figure to which this pontificate has now accustomed us to 12 years forward: The important thing is to cause and generate processes. Which could also be fascinating, if not for the fact that, like all jurists, We cannot help but consider that the processes, precisely for a matter of justice fairness and respect for the parties, they cannot last forever, Why, sooner or later, one of two:either they reach sentence or are archived.

Velletri of Rome, 19 January 2025

.

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

At the clerical borders with reality: the woman suffers from Freudian penis envy, the Possum of envy by Matteo Bruni, director of the Holy See Press Office

AT THE CLERICAL BORDERS WITH REALITY: THE WOMAN SUFFERS FROM FREUDIAN PENIS ENVY, The Opossum of the envy by Matteo Bruni Director of the Press Room of the Holy See

I don't ask such questions for me, but for a friend without canonical culture. Regardless that if the opossum gets irritated it does not hesitate to write fire letters, with attached leziers of canon law, To the Bishops of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos.

Hypatia's cogitatory

(at the bottom of: All articles)

.

Author Hypatia Gatta Romana

Author
Hypatia Gatta Roman

.

.

.

 

 

 

 

 

.

I ask for a friend without canonistic culture: why theOpossum, When he plays to make the Vatican information agency that is not the right, in announcing certain appointments published by the Bulletin of the Press room of the Holy See directed by his vituped and multi-insulted Matteo Bruni, Ergo passed as if the press room was his gossip blogghetto&Poisons, in good clericse sciorina: «The Holy Father appointed his reverend Eminence Mr. Cardinal Maurino Piacente Active Member of the Pontifical Academy of Roman Culture ‘Mo Pijatelo‘ Undercul… The Holy Father elected to the episcopal headquarters of Gaiana in parts of unbelievers and tenderness The Rev. Presbytero Marco Capacchino da Montefeltro ... ", Except, however, losing all this good Clericlese when it comes to appointing the Roman pontiff indicated as "Bergoglio", or the archpriest of the papal archbasilical of San Pietro indicated as "Mauro Gambetti", or "Gambetti", Without indicating him at all as his reverend eminentness Mr. Cardinal Mauro Gambetti, object of its continuous insults for some years (see WHO). Come May, These formal and substantial discrepancies?

I don't ask such questions for me, but for a friend without canonical culture. Regardless that if the opossum gets irritated it does not hesitate to write fire letters, with attached leziers of canon law, To the Bishops of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos, to which it is all too clear that in this world, According to the bold Freudian theory, The woman would suffer fromenvy of the male penis, While others seem to suffer from the priest's envy.

the Island of Patmos, 15 January 2025

 

Blessed Virgin Mary Gattara, protector of Catholic cats

.

Our previous articles on the Band of the Silerian:

– 16 August 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And that word taboo that he just can't pronounce: "HOMOSEXUALITY" (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 August 2025 — There is a homosexual? AT THAT TIME I CAN'T BE SILENT Also defends the indefensible (To open the article click WHO)

– 29 March 2025 — Always about I CAN'T BE SILENT: DAL “Vertical man"A" Fireculo "and" quadhow "of Leonardo Sciascia (To open the article click WHO)

– 21 March 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And the story of that convinced seamstress that he can give Giorgio Armani high fashion lessons (To open the article click WHO)

– 12 February 2025 — The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessions OF SAINT AUGUSTINE (To open the article click WHO)

– 15 January 2025 — AT THE CLERICAL BORDERS WITH REALITY: THE WOMAN SUFFERS FROM FREUDIAN PENIS ENVY, The Opossum of the envy by Matteo Bruni Director of the Press Room of the Holy See (To open the article click WHO)

– 20 January 2025 — THE OPOSSUM IGNORE THAT A NUN CAN QUIETLY BECOME GOVERNOR OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE, As already was Giulio Sacchetti (To open the article click WHO)

– 22 November 2024 — THE EPISCOPAL APPOINTMENT OF RENATO TARANTELLI BACCARI. WHEN YOU ARE AFFECTED BY LIVER CANCER, THEY CHARGE ON THE ATTACK THOSE WHO CANNOT BE SILENT (To open the article click WHO)

– 31 May 2024 — A NOTE FROM FATHER ARIEL ON THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT: «AS ANNOYING AS A SEA URCHIN INSIDE YOUR UNDERPANTS» (To open the article click WHO)

– 8 December 2023 — WHO IS MARCO FELIPE PERFETTI REFERRING TO STATING FROM THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT «HERE IN THE VATICAN… WE IN THE VATICAN…», IF YOU CANNOT EVEN SET FOOT IN THE VATICAN? (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 October 2023 — THE ARCHABOT EMERITUS OF MONTECASSINO PIETRO VITTORELLI HAS DEAD: CHRISTIAN PIETY CAN ERASE THE SAD TRUTH? (To open the article click WHO)

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Perhaps Jesus needed to be cleansed and forgiven of sins through baptism?

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

PERHAPS JESUS ​​NEEDED TO BE PURIFIED AND FORGIVEN FROM SINS THROUGH BAPTISM?

Jesus' immersion in the Jordan is a sign that reveals what fate the Word made flesh shared: that of sinners. As Paul writes: «He who had known no sin, God dealt with it from sin in our favor, because we could become through him justice of God ".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

A surprising episode, even embarrassing, that of the baptism of Jesus, who removes all doubts about his historicity.

Pietro Perugino Pala di Sant 'Agostino, Baptism of Jesus, 1512

Giovanni al Giordano gives a baptism of penance, According to what is written in LC 3,3. Jesus perhaps needed to be forgiven by sins? To try to answer, We follow the wire of the page of the evangelical story of this Sunday, in the Lucanian version.

"During that time, since the people were waiting and everyone, about Giovanni, they asked themselves in their hearts if he was not the Christ, Giovanni replied to everyone by saying: «I baptize you with water; but he comes the one who is stronger than me, to which I am not worthy of unrelating the laces of sandals. He will baptize you in the Holy Spirit and Fire ". And here, while all the people were baptized and Jesus, He also received the baptism, He was in prayer, The sky opened and descended the Holy Spirit over him in the body form, like a dove, and a voice came from heaven: «You are my son, the beloved: In you I placed my complacency " (LC 3,15-16.21-22).

In this evangelical song we notice some peculiarities. Only Luke tells us that Jesus received baptism in this way: "When all the people were baptized" (3,21). Lined up like the other Jesus is the last of a long procession. The expression "all the people" is typical of the evangelist Luca and is not a simple statement aimed at exaggerating reality to amplify it; instead has a theological thickness. The first use of this expression in the Bible is found in the book of Genesis, In the story of the sin of the inhabitants of Sodoma:

“Sodom's men gathered around the house [In Lot] From young people to old people, All the people in complete " (19,4).

This wording recalls the sinful condition of an entire group of men, the complicity in the sin of a specific multitude. Luca uses the expression "all the people" to affirm that the event of the baptism of Jesus in fact concerns all the people of Israel, How many have been touched by the testimony of Giovanni Battista and beyond. The immersion in the Jordanian waters was a sign of conversion and penance, The attitude to which everyone was called to welcome salvation. But San Luca also seems to look beyond the people of Israel and lets it leak that it is all humanity that is convened and embraced.

In the mystery of Christmas We meditated the incarnation of the Son of God, His coming as a man among men, assuming "in everything except sin" true human nature. Put in this way, Jesus' immersion in the Jordan is a sign that reveals what fate the Word made flesh shared: that of sinners. As Paul writes:

«He who had known no sin, God dealt with it from sin in our favor, because we could become through him justice of God " (2Color 5,21).

Rendered with greater loyalty to the Greek text, This passage of our song could be translated like this: “When all the people were immersed, Jesus was also immersed ", as if to mean that Jesus immerses himself in the immersion of the people. Not only is he a member of his people but immerses himself in his own condition and is with this act that he starts his public ministry, manifesting his profound solidarity with us humans, Even in our condition of sinners.

For the evangelist Luca, At that time, The episode of the Baptism of the Lord is of a fundamental theological function because Jesus, even before being attempted and then starting his ministry, starts from there. Although this aspect is more evident in the Gospel according to Matteo it is clear for the evangelist who in this mystery are summarized the various passages of the Jordan already accomplished in the history of salvation. From that of Israel fleeing from Egypt, To enter the promised land, Until the return of the same from Babylon after the exile. The Jordan also appears to be fundamental for Jesus; He crosses him to enter his mission, in a condition, at least outside, of penance. Everything will be clear to the other baptism that he has yet to receive (LC 12, 50: «I have a baptism in which I will be baptized, and how they are anguished until it is accomplished!»). From baptism in the waters of the Jordan to baptism in death and resurrection that is his Easter, The Lord has never ceased to immerse himself in the waters of our often sinful human condition, In the agitated waters of our existence. Comes to immerse yourself in our poor humanity to deposit the infinite love of the Father.

The other peculiarity of today's evangelical song It is represented by the fact that only Luke tells us that Jesus, received baptism, "He was in prayer". Just the third Gospel has particular attention to this aspect, Since the most decisive moments of the Ministry of Jesus are prepared or accompanied by a more intense prayer: his baptism, the choice of the twelve (LC 6,12), The question asked to the twelve about who is Jesus for people (9,18), the transfiguration (9,28) and passion (22,41-45). San Luca does not report any word of this prayer of Jesus and not even what God could have communicated to him. However, from the words got off the sky, We can understand that it is a branch prayer, An aspect the latter characteristic of the way of relating to Jesus to God as a Father, remarked here by Luca and above all from the fourth Gospel: "Dad, The time has come: glorifies your Son because the Son glorifies you ... all my things are yours, And yours are mine " (GV 17, 1. 10). The Father recognizes Jesus as his favorite son, with which it has a profound relationship that defines and distinguishes the personality of Jesus since childhood: «You didn't know that I have to deal with the things of my Father my Father?» (LC 2,49).

Finally the context of the evangelical scene Recalls the book of the prophet Isaiah and the vocation of the elect:

«Here is my servant that I support, my elected I take please. I placed my spirit about him; He will bring the right to nations " (Is 42,1).

The mission of the servant He begins with communion and communication with the Father and the gift of the Spirit. The Holy Spirit reaches the divinity of Jesus solemnly when he made, like any man, the penitential gesture, having subjected to John's baptism. During his earthly life, Jesus will never show himself as big as in the humility of gestures and words. An important lesson for us who see things so differently. Following Christ means taking this path of humility, that is, of truth. Christ, true God and true man, He teaches us the truth of our being. We too Christians have been given the grace of the Spirit and for us there is also a mission to do and a testimony to be given. We ask to know her, As Jesus knew his to the Jordan and to be able to live it. Why this happens, The gift of the Spirit must always be asked persistently:

«The behavior of Jesus who prays when the Spirit comes, must serve as an example to believers: The gift of the Holy Spirit is in fact the essential question of Christian prayer " (Gérard Rossé).

From the Hermitage, 12 January 2025

Baptism of the Lord

 

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

The Holy Father appoints a woman prefect of the Dicastery for Religious supported by a cardinal as pro-prefect, i.e. his deputy

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

THE HOLY FATHER APPOINTS A WOMAN PREFECT OF THE DEPARTMENT FOR RELIGIOUS SUPPORTED BY A CARDINAL AS PRO-PREFECT

It is not difficult to understand who the advisor was, we have always known that the Jesuit canonist Gianfranco Ghirlanda, today cardinal, maintains that «the power of government in the Church does not come from the Sacrament of Orders, but from the canonical mission".

– The briefs of the Fathers of the Isle of Patmos –

Author Teodoro Beccia

Author
Teodoro Beccia

.

Christian brothers separated from the Catholic Church members of the Anglican Community have urged us several times:

«Never put women in ecclesial governance roles, don't make our mistake, otherwise you will pay all the consequences".

the imaginative and legendary figure of Popess Joan

To help those who did not accept the institution of women priests, the episcopesse one is worse, the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI issued the Apostolic Constitution groups of Anglicans, containing instruction regarding the establishment of personal ordinariates for Anglicans entering full communion with the Catholic Church.

Going further back in time, the Orthodox invited as observers to the Second Vatican Council, they said to several of our Fathers who were pushing for the abolition of priestly celibacy:

"You who have priestly celibacy, keep it. Otherwise you risk ending up like us: most of the problems that our bishops are forced to face and resolve originate from quarrels between priests instigated by their wives, or by quarrels between priests' wives".

The Supreme Pontiff Francis appointed a nun as Prefect of the Dicastery for Religious, Simona Brambilla, supported as pro-prefect by the Cardinal Ángel Fernández Artime, S.D.B (See. Official bulletin). And here it is worth remembering that the prefect is the owner of the department, while the pro-prophet it's a lieutenant, that is, the prefect's deputy, appointed as such to carry out vicarious functions as his delegate.

It is not difficult to understand who the advisor was, we have always known that the Jesuit canonist Gianfranco Ghirlanda, today cardinal, maintains that «the power of government in the Church does not come from the Sacrament of Orders, but from the canonical mission". Thus affirming «the fundamental equality between all the baptized, albeit in differentiation and complementarity […] which founds the synodality" (cf.. WHO).

Applying the same principle, one could easily argue that it is lawful to appoint Sister Pasquina della Bela Madunina as Metropolitan Archbishop of Milan, exercising as such the power of government of the Ambrosian Diocese, which according to Ghirlanda does not come from the Sacrament of Orders. After that, so that there is someone responsible for also exercising the necessary sacramental powers of the episcopate, it will be enough to appoint an auxiliary bishop to Archbishop Sister Pasquina della Bela Madunina, if anything the Reverend Abbondio Che te Brillet de Lontan. Because this is what was concretely done with the appointment of the Sister as prefect of the dicastery and the Cardinal as pro-prefect. That said, faced with so much evidence, any other comment would just be a useless waste of time and words.

Velletri of Rome, 7 January 2025

.

______________________________

THE HOLY FATHER APPOINTS A WOMAN PREFECT OF THE DICASTERY FOR RELIGIOUS, SUPPORTED BY A CARDINAL AS PRO-PREFECT

Is’t difficult to understand who was the inspirer, the Jesuit canonist Gianfranco Ghirlanda, now cardinal, whit always maintained: «the power of government in the Church does not come from the Sacrament of Orders, but from the canonical mission».

The short articles by Fathers the Patmos Island

Author Teodoro Beccia

Author
Teodoro Beccia

.

Christian brothers separated from the Catholic Church belonging to the Anglican Community have repeatedly urged us:

«Never put women in roles of ecclesial government, do not make our mistake, otherwise you will pay all the consequences».

The imaginative and legendary figure of Popesse Joan

To help those who did not accept the institution of women priests, worse than women bishops, the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI issued the Apostolic Constitution groups of Anglicans, containing instructions on the institution of personal ordinariates for Anglicans who enter into full communion with the Catholic Church.

Going back in time, the Orthodox invited as observers to Second Vatican Council, told several of our Fathers who pushing for the priestly celibacy abolition:

«You who have priestly celibacy, keep it. Otherwise you risk ending up like us: many part of the problems that our bishops are forced to resolve originate from quarrels between priests fomented by their wives, or from quarrels between the wives of priests».

The Supreme Pontiff Francis has appointed as Prefect of the Religious Dicastery for Religious a nun, Simona Brambilla, supported as pro-prefect by Cardinal Ángel Fernández Artime, S.D.B (See Official Bulletin). And here is necessary remembering that the prefect is the head of the dicastery, the pro-profect is a lieutenant, that is, the vice-prefect, appointed to carry out vicarious functions as delegate.

Is’t difficult to understand who was the inspirer, the Jesuit canonist Gianfranco Ghirlanda, now cardinal, whit always maintained: «the power of government in the Church does not come from the Sacrament of Orders, but from the canonical mission». Thus affirming «the fundamental equality between all the baptized, even if in differentiation and complementarity […] which founds synodality» (see HERE).

Applying this principle, one could support the legitimacy of appointing Sister Playful Metropolitan Archbishop of Milan, and exercising the power of government of the Ambrosian Diocese, which according to Ghirlanda does not come from the Sacrament of Orders. After that, in order for there to be to also exercise the sacramental powers proper to the episcopate, it will be enough to appoint an auxiliary bishop to the Archbishop Sister Playful, perhaps the Reverend Placid of the Good Lamb. This is has been with the appointment of the Sister as prefect of the dicastery and of the Cardinal as pro-prefect. In the face of this evidence, any other comment only be a waste of time and words.

Velletri of Rome, 7 January 2025

.

_________________________________

.

THE HOLY FATHER APPOINTS A WOMAN PREFECT OF THE DICASTERY FOR RELIGIOUS SUPPORTED BY A CARDINAL AS PRO-PREFECT

It is not difficult to understand who was the inspiration, we have always known that the Jesuit canonist Gianfranco Ghirlanda, today cardinal, maintains that "the power of government in the Church does not come from the Sacrament Order, but of that of canonical mission».

— Brief articles from the Fathers of the Island of Patmos —

.

Author Teodoro Beccia

Author
Teodoro Beccia

.

Christian brothers separated from the Catholic Church belonging to the Anglican Community have repeatedly exhorted us:

«Never put women in functions of ecclesiastical government, don't make our mistake, Otherwise you will pay all the consequences.".

To help those who did not accept the institution of women priests, even worse than that of the Episcopesas, The Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI issued the Apostolic Constitution groups of Anglicans, containing instructions on the establishment of personal Ordinariates for Anglicans entering into full communion with the Catholic Church.

Going further back in time: Orthodox invited as observers to the Second Vatican Council, they told several of our Fathers who were pressing for the abolition of priestly celibacy:

«You who have priestly celibacy, conservadlo. Otherwise, you run the risk of ending up like us: Many of the problems that our bishops are forced to face and solve have their origin in fights between priests encouraged by their wives., or fights between priests' wives..

The Supreme Pontiff Francis has named a nun, Simona Brambilla, Prefect of the Dicastery for Religious, supported as Pro-Prefect by Cardinal Ángel Fernández Artime, S.D.B. (See. Official Gazette). And here it is worth remembering that the prefect is the head of the dicastery, while the pro-prefect is an adjunct appointed as such to perform vicarious functions as a delegate.

It is not difficult to understand who was the inspiration, we have always known that the Jesuit canonist Gianfranco Ghirlanda, today cardinal, maintains that "the power of government in the Church does not come from the Sacrament Order, but of that of canonical mission». Thus affirming "the fundamental equality between all the baptized, although in the differentiation and complementarity […] "that founds synodality" (See. HERE).

Applying the same principle, It could be safely maintained that it is lawful to name Sister Pasquina del Corazón Joyo de Jesús Metropolitan Archbishop of Milan, exercising as such the power of government of the Ambrosian Diocese, which according to Ghirlanda, does not come from the Sacrament of Orders. After, so that there is someone responsible for exercising the necessary sacramental powers of the episcopate, It will be enough to appoint an auxiliary bishop of Archbishop Sister Pasquina, just in case the reverend Afraid of the Holy Lamb. Because this is indeed, what was done with the appointment of the nun as prefect of the dicastery and the cardinal as pro-prefect. That being said, in the face of so much evidence, Any other comment would be a useless waste of time and words..

Velletri, Rome, 7 January 2025

.

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The problem is that the Holy Father has no protections to protect his own unhappy expressions

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

 

THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE HOLY FATHER HAS NO PROTECTIONS TO PROTECT HIS OWN UNHAPPY EXPRESSIONS

Protecting the Supreme Pontiff means first of all protecting the Church of Christ and the institution of the papacy which is not a disposable good belonging to whoever received it, just as the episcopate does not belong to bishops and the priesthood does not belong to us priests.

— The short of the fathers of L'Isola di Patmos —

.

We've gotten used to it by now: no one had ever targeted priests like this Pontiff, religious men and women.

The problem is not the reproachful tones, because his Supreme Predecessor Pius XI also wrote in 1935 a memorable encyclical on the drifts and inadequacies of the clergy, the To the Catholic priesthood, but he did it with the love of a father and the heart of a shepherd. Francis does not limit himself to scolding us, because it mocks us. And every time he does it, all the international leftists and the fringes of the most radical secularism rejoice at the jokes of the first Supreme Pontiff in history who publicly mocks his priests, religious men and women (This topic is also covered in my book: Digressions of a liberal priest).

Nothing to say that certain nuns can have «the vinegar face» (cf.. WHO), as the Holy Father stated, After having already urged them in the past «Don't be acid spinster» (cf.. WHO). And there are sour spinsters, we know it, of always. The problem, however, is something else: these are the arguments and languages ​​of a Supreme Pontiff whose words go around the world?

The Holy Father, by his choice and will, it is devoid of all those defense mechanisms with which the much despised Roman Curia has always protected its predecessors. Protecting the Supreme Pontiff means first of all protecting the Church of Christ and the institution of the papacy which is not a disposable good belonging to whoever received it, just as the episcopate does not belong to the bishops and the priesthood does not belong to us. While the severe warning looms over all of us:

«To anyone who was given a lot, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, much more will be required (LC 12, 48)».

And this is especially true for the August successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter, who more than any of us has received a lot, Vinegar faces aside …

From the island of Patmos, 5 January 2025

.

______________________________

 

THE HOLY FATHER ISN’T PROTECTED FROM THE RISKS HIS UNHAPPY EXPRESSIONS, THIS IS THE PROBLEM

Protecting the Supreme Pontiff means first of all protecting the Christ’s Church and the institution of the papacy which is not an available good belonging those who received it, just as the episcopate does not belong to bishops and the priesthood does’t belong to us priests.

— The short articles by Fathers the Patmos Island —

.

By now we are used to it: no one like this Pontiff has ever targeted priests, men and women religious.

The problem is not the tone of reproach, because even his Supreme Predecessor Pius XI wrote a memorable encyclical in 1935 on the inadequacies of the clergy (see: To the Catholic priesthood), but he did it with the love of a father and the heart of a shepherd. Francis does’t limit himself to reproaching us, because he mocks us. And every time he does so, the entire international left and the fringes of the most radical secularism rejoice at the jokes of the first Supreme Pontiff in history who publicly mocks his priests, men and women religious (this topic is discussed also in my book: Digressions a Liberal Priest, currently available only in Italian).

Nothing to say that certain nuns may have «vinegar faces» (consult here), as the Holy Father stated, after having already urged them in the past «not to be sour spinsters» (consult here). The problem is something else: are these the arguments and languages of a Supreme Pontiff whose words go around the world?

The Holy Father, by his own choice, is deprived of all those defense mechanisms with which the much despised Roman Curia has always protected its predecessors. Protecting the Supreme Pontiff means first of all protecting the Church of Christ and the institution of the papacy which is not an available good belonging to those who received it, just as the episcopate does not belong to bishops and the priesthood does not belong to us priests. While the severe warning looms over all of us:

«Much will be required of the person entrusted with much, and still more will be demanded of the person entrusted with more» (Lukas, 12, 48).

And this is especially true for the successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter, who has received more than all of us, faces of vinegard aside …

From the Island of Patmos, 5 Jannuary 2025

.

________________________________

 

THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE HOLY FATHER NO LONGER HAS THE PROTECTIONS TO PROTECT HIS UNHAPPY EXPRESSIONS

Protecting the Supreme Pontiff means, first of all, protecting the Church of Christ and the institution of the papacy, that it is not an available good that belongs to the person who receives it, just as the episcopacy does not belong to the bishops and the priesthood does not belong to us.

— Short articles of the parents of Patmos Island —

.

 

We have already gotten used to it: no one has ever attacked priests, religious men and women, like this Pontiff.

The problem is not the reproachful tones, because his Supreme Predecessor Pius in it 1933 wrote a memorable encyclical on the deviations and insufficiencies of the clergy, la To the Catholic priesthood, but he did it with the love of a father and the heart of a shepherd.

Francisco not only limits himself to scolding, but he mocks us. And every time it does, The entire international left and the most radical groups of secularism rejoice at the jokes of the first Supreme Pontiff in history to publicly mock his priests, religious men and women. A topic that I also cover in my book.: Digressions of a liberal priest (Digressions of a liberal priest).

It cannot be denied that some nuns have “vinegar face”, as the Holy Father stated (news here), after having exhort them in the past to «not be» (news here). And if there are bitter spinsters, we have always known. However, the problem is another: ¿These are the arguments and languages ​​of a pontiff whose words turn the world?

The Holy Father, by own choice and will, It is devoid of all those defense mechanisms with which the much despised Roman Curia had always protected its predecessors.. Protecting the Supreme Pontiff means, first of all, protecting the Church of Christ and the institution of the papacy, that it is not an available good that belongs to the person who receives it, just as the episcopacy does not belong to the bishops and the priesthood does not belong to us. As the stern warning hangs over us all:

«To everyone who has been given a lot, much will be asked of you; to whom much has been entrusted, much more will be required (LC 12, 48)”.

And this applies above all to the Successor of the blessed Apostle Peter more than to all of us, who has received a lot, leaving aside the sour faces…

From the Island of Patmos, 5 January 2025

.

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos n Agency. 59 of Rome IBAN code: IT74R0503403259000000301118 For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

On the third day of the new year the memory of the Holy Name of Jesus is remembered, before which every knee bows

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

 

ON THE THIRD DAY OF THE NEW YEAR WE REMEMBER THE MEMORY OF THE HOLY NAME OF JESUS, IN FRONT OF WHICH EACH KNEE BENDS

Salvation, the real one that recovers man, it is not found in political or ecclesiastical intrigues, in the end-of-year speeches of the world's powerful or in their scenographic and demagogic gestures of pauperism and mercy, often so empty and artificially produced by the sophisms of human cunning.

— The Briefs of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos —

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm.Cap.

.

The liturgical calendar of the Franciscan family proposes every new year, on the third day of January, the memory of the Holy Name of Jesus.

Historically we know that it was Pope Clement VII In the 1530 to authorize, for the entire Franciscan Order, the recitation of the Office of the Most Holy Name of Jesus. This is thanks above all to a particular devotion to the Holy Name which became the prerogative of the Franciscan Order - alas long before the good Jesuits - but also above all thanks to the apostolate and zeal of San Bernardino da Siena and the blessed brothers Alberto da Sarteáno and Bernardino da Feltre.

The practice and devotion of the Holy Name of Jesus it spread very quickly and with such enthusiasm and fervor that its own liturgical celebration was soon established. The Holy Spirit who worked mysteriously in the hearts of my ancient brothers, fathers of our beloved Order, he realized pastorally what the blessed apostle Paul wrote in his Letter to the Philippians (cf. Fil 2,10-11):

«so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow in heaven, on earth and under the earth; and let every tongue declare that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father ".

Remember this dogmatic truth, liturgical and pastoral on the Most Holy Name of Jesus is particularly significant at the beginning of each new year, taking into account that the 2025 it is also a jubilee year. In the life of a Christian everything should be centered and oriented on Jesus, whose name means "The Lord saves". It is more necessary than ever to reiterate that in man's life - no matter whether he is a believer or not - everything asks for salvation, every dimension of his being and his existence calls daily to a holistic salvation of the entire human being. And salvation, the real one that recovers man, it is not found in political or ecclesiastical intrigues, in the end-of-year speeches of the world's powerful or in their scenographic and demagogic gestures of pauperism and mercy, often so empty and artificially produced by the sophisms of human cunning. The salvation that recovers and redeems is not even that of a clericalism of compromise or of a jubilee without the truth of guilt and the certainty of a redemption that invites conversion.

Before the Most Holy Name of Jesus we can only bend each knee, with the hope that after that the heart will also, the mind and the whole man bow to the lordship of Jesus Christ, the only one who is able to ask for and give full and lasting salvation.

Happy New Year.

Sanluri, 2 January 2025.

.

________________________________________

ON THE THIRD DAY OF THE NEW YEAR WE REMEMBER THE HOLY NAME OF JESUS, BEFORE WHICH EVERY KNEE GENUFLECTS

And salvation, the true one that recovers man, is not found in political or ecclesiastical intrigues, in the end-of-year speeches of the world’s powerful or in their scenographic and demagogic gestures of pauperism and false mercy, often so empty and artificially produced from the sophisms of human cunning.

The short articles by Fathers the Patmos Island

 

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm.Cap.

.

The liturgical calendar of the Franciscan family proposes every new year, on the third day of January, the memory of the Most Holy Name of Jesus.

Historically we know that it was the Holy Father Clement VII in 1530 who authorized, for the entire Franciscan Order, the recitation of the Office of the Most Holy Name of Jesus. This is thanks above all to a particular devotion to the Holy Name which became the prerogative of the Franciscan order ― alas long before the good Jesuits ― but also all thanks to the apostolate and zeal of Saint Bernardino of Siena, the Blesseds Albert from Sarteáno and Bernardino from Feltre.

The pious practice and devotion to the Most Holy Name of Jesus spread rapidly and with enthusiasm and fervor that a liturgical feast of its own was soon established. The Holy Spirit who worked mysteriously in the hearts of my ancient brothers, fathers of our beloved Order, realized pastorally what the Blessed Apostle Paul wrote in his Letter to the Philippians (cf. Phil 2,10-11):

«So that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven, on earth and under the earth; and let every tongue proclaim that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father».

Remembering this dogmatic, liturgical and pastoral truth about the Most Holy Name of Jesus is particularly significant at the beginning of each new year, taking into account that 2025 is also a Jubilee year. In the life of a Christian everything should be centered and oriented on Jesus, whose name means “The Lord saves”. It is more necessary than ever to reiterate that in the life of man ― no matter whether he is a believer or not ― everything asks for salvation, every dimension of his being and existence calls daily to a holistic salvation of the entire human being.

And salvation, the true one that recovers man, is not found in political or ecclesiastical intrigues, in the end-of-year speeches of the world’s powerful or in their scenographic and demagogic gestures of pauperism and false mercy, often so empty and artificially produced from the sophisms of human cunning. The salvation that recovers and redeems is not even that of a clericalism of compromise or of a jubilee without the truth of guilt and the certainty of a redemption that invites conversion.

Before the Most Holy Name of Jesus we can only bend every knee, with the hope that after that also the heart, the mind and the whole man will bend to the lordship of Jesus Christ, the only one who is able to ask and give the full and lasting salvation.

Happy New Year.

Sanluri, 2 January 2025

.

_________________________

ON THE THIRD DAY OF THE NEW YEAR WE REMEMBER THE MEMORY OF THE HOLY NAME OF JESUS, BEFORE WHICH EVERY KNEE BENDS

The true salvation that recovers man, It is not found in political or ecclesiastical intrigues, in the end-of-year speeches of the world's powerful or in their scenographic and demagogic gestures of pauperism and false mercy, often so empty and artificially produced by the sophistry of human cunning.

— Brief articles from the Fathers of the Island of Patmos —

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm.Cap.

.

The liturgical calendar typical of the Franciscan family proposes every new year, the third day of January, the memory of the Most Holy Name of Jesus.

Historically we know that it was the Holy Father Clement VII, in 1530, who authorized the recitation of the Office of the Most Holy Name of Jesus for the entire Franciscan Order. This was mainly due to a particular devotion to the Holy Name that became the prerogative of the Franciscan Order — unfortunately, long before the good Jesuits —, but above all, thanks to the apostolate and zeal of Saint Bernardino of Siena and the Blessed confreres Alberto de Sarteáno and Bernardino de Feltre.

The practice and devotion of the Most Holy Name of Jesus It spread very quickly with such impetus and fervor that a liturgical festival of its own was soon established.. The Holy Spirit, that worked mysteriously in the hearts of my former confreres, the fathers of our beloved Order, pastorally fulfilled what the blessed Apostle Paul wrote in his Letter to the Philippians (cf. Flp 2, 10-11)

"May every knee in heaven bow at the name of Jesus.", on the ground and under the ground; and every tongue proclaim that Jesus Christ is Lord, "to the glory of God the Father".

Remember this dogmatic truth, liturgical and pastoral teaching on the Most Holy Name of Jesus is particularly significant at the beginning of each new year, taking into account that the 2025 It is also a jubilee year.. In the life of the Christian everything must be centered and oriented on Jesus, whose name means "The Lord saves". It is as necessary as ever to reiterate that in the life of man - whether a believer or not - everything demands salvation, Every dimension of your being and your existence demands daily an integral salvation of the entire human being.. and salvation, the true salvation that recovers man, It is not found in political or ecclesiastical intrigues, in the end-of-year speeches of the world's powerful or in their scenographic and demagogic gestures of pauperism and false mercy, often so empty and artificially produced by the sophistry of human cunning. Nor is the salvation that recovers and redeems that of a clericalism of commitment or that of a jubilee without the truth of guilt and the certainty of a redemption that invites conversion..

Before the Most Holy Name of Jesus you can only bend every knee, in the hope that later your heart will also bend, the mind and the entire man before the lordship of Jesus Christ, the only one capable of asking for and giving full and lasting salvation.

Happy new year.

Sanluri, 2 of January 2025

.

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Perennial dissatisfaction: “Madame Bovary”, the era of social networks and sanctity next door (italiano, Portuguese, english)

(original text in Portuguese / english text after the portuguese originaly)

 

Perennial dissatisfaction: “MADAME BOVARY”,
The era of SOCIAL NETWORK And holiness next door

I social network they amplify dissatisfaction with real life by presenting a filtered and embellished reality, where the moments of joy are exaggerated, creating a distorted perception of the life of others. This constant comparison with apparently perfect lives can increase feelings of inadequacy, failure, envy and dissatisfaction.

- Pastoral reflections -

.

 

Print format article

Format Article Printing

Print-size article

.

.

Human dissatisfaction is a timeless theme which manifests itself in classical literature as in the era of social media. In the literary work Madame Bovary (1856), Gustave Flaubert Explore Emma Bovary's chronic dissatisfaction with her ordinary life and her search for a romantic ideal unattainable.

The work captures the essence of the human condition and anticipates modern dissatisfaction. Emma personifies the fight against mediocrity and the search for romantic idealizations, fueled by readings that make her despise her life with her husband, Charles Bovary. His search for evasion through love adventures and reckless luxuries culminates in financial and emotional ruin, illustrating the consequences of unusuals perpetuated by the illusions. Emma's experience reflects modern human condition, where the idealizations conveyed by social media cause comparable unusual.

I social network amplify dissatisfaction with real life by presenting a filtered and embellished reality, where the moments of joy are exaggerated, creating a distorted perception of the life of others. This constant comparison with apparently perfect lives can increase feelings of inadequacy, failure, envy and dissatisfaction. Especially among young people, comparison with the salient points represented online it gives YouTuber e influence leads to low self-esteem and feelings of inadequacy. Continuous exposure to these unattainable ideals creates a vicious cycle of comparison and dissatisfaction, similar to that experienced by Emma Bovary.

I social network promote a constant search for validation through likes, comments and shares, especially among young people. Lack of recognition online can cause feelings of rejection and exclusion, self-harm as a mechanism of temporary relief from emotional pain and worsen the toxic dynamics of social network. Hyperconnectivity and the fear of missing out (FOMO: Fear of Missing Out) contribute to constant anxiety. Prolonged exposure to competitive online environments can trigger or worsen depression, leading to desperation, to disinterest in previously enjoyable activities e, in extreme cases, to suicidal thoughts.

Against the wave of dissatisfaction fueled by illusions, holiness in everyday life emerges as an effective remedy, enhancing the simple and genuine joys of everyday life, fruits of divine goodness. This concept promotes a more aware and grateful approach to reality, focusing on the present and the small blessings that are often overlooked. He proposes to accept life as it is, cultivating gratitude and presence instead of desiring alternative realities.

The Holy Father Francis reminds us: «I like to see holiness in God's patient people … in parents who raise their children with love, in workers, in the sick, in the consecrated elderly women who continue to smile" (Rejoice and rejoice, n.7).

The analysis of perennial dissatisfaction, from the literary perspective of Madame Bovary to demonstrations in the era of social network, reveals a constant challenge to the human condition: the search for satisfaction amidst often unrealistic expectations. The Holiness Next Door emerges as a powerful response to this dilemma, offering a path to a genuine appreciation of life in its simplest and most authentic forms.

I conclude with an appeal to my fellow priests and to the Ecclesiastical Authorities of the Church of Christ, so that many young people do not suffer the same tragic fate as Emma Bovary: let's wake up to this situation!

Jundiaì, 2 January 2025

 

.

______________________________

 

PERENNIAL DISSATISFACTION: “MADAME BOVARY”,
THE AGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND SANCTITY AT THE DOOR

Social networks amplify dissatisfaction with real life by presenting a filtered and beautified reality, where moments of joy are exaggerated, creating a distorted perception of the lives of others.

— Pastoral reflections —

Author
Eneas de Camargo Beast

.

Human dissatisfaction, timeless theme, finds expression in classical literature and in the age of social media. Em Madame Bovary (1856), Gustave Flaubert explores Emma Bovary's chronic dissatisfaction with her ordinary life and her search for an unattainable romantic ideal.

The work captures the essence of the human condition and anticipates modern dissatisfaction. Emma personifies the fight against mediocrity and the search for romantic idealizations, fed by readings that make her despise her life with her husband, Charles Bovary. His search for escapism through loving adventures and reckless luxuries culminates in financial and emotional ruin, illustrating the consequences of dissatisfaction perpetuated by illusions. Emma's experience reflects modern human condition, where idealizations conveyed by social networks cause comparable dissatisfaction.

Social networks amplify dissatisfaction with real life in presenting a filtered and embellished reality, where moments of joy are exaggerated, creating a distorted perception of the lives of others. This constant confrontation with seemingly perfect lives can increase feelings of inadequacy, failure, envy and dissatisfaction. Especially among young people, the comparison with the high moments portrayed online by youtubers e influencers leads to low self-esteem and feelings of inadequacy. Continued exposure to these unattainable ideals creates a vicious cycle of comparison and dissatisfaction, similar to what Emma Bovary experienced.

Social networks promote a constant search for validation through likes, comments and shares, especially among young people. Lack of recognition online can cause feelings of rejection and exclusion, self-harm as a temporary relief mechanism for emotional pain, and worsen the toxic dynamics of social networks. Hyperconnectivity and the fear of losing something (FOMO: Fear of Missing Out) contribute to constant anxiety. Prolonged exposure to environments online Competitive activities can trigger or worsen depression, leading to hopelessness, lack of interest in activities that were previously pleasurable and, in extreme cases, suicidal thoughts.

The correlation between excessive use of social media and the rise of mental disorders among young people requires a multifaceted response. It is crucial to raise awareness about the risks associated with the excessive use of these platforms and encourage the adoption of healthy online habits.

Against the tide of dissatisfaction fueled by illusions, holiness in everyday life appears as an effective medicine, valuing the simple, genuine joys of daily life, fruits of Divine Kindness. This concept promotes a more conscious and grateful approach to reality, focusing on the present and the small blessings often ignored. It proposes acceptance of life as it is, cultivating gratitude and presence rather than longing for alternative realities:

«I like to see holiness in the patient people of God… in parents who raise their children with love, in workers, in patients, in the consecrated elderly women who continue to smile» (Papa Francisco, Rejoice and rejoice, n.7).

The analysis of perennial dissatisfaction, from the literary perspective of Madame Bovary to demonstrations in the age of social media, reveals a constant challenge of the human condition: the search for satisfaction amid often unrealistic expectations. Holiness "at the door" emerges as a powerful response to this dilemma, offering a path to genuine appreciation of life in its simplest and most authentic forms.

I finish with an appeal to my priest brothers and to the other leaders of the Church, so that many young people do not have the same tragic fate as Emma Bovary: Wake up for such a situation!

Jundiaì 30 January 2025

.

.

PERENNIAL DISSATISFACTION: “MADAME BOVARY”, THE ERA OF SOCIAL NETWORKS AND HOLINESS AT THE DOORS

The social networks amplify dissatisfaction with real life by presenting a filtered and embellished reality, where moments of joy are exaggerated, creating a distorted perception of the lives of others.

— pastoral reflections —

Author
Eneas de Camargo Beast

 

The human dissatisfaction is a timeless theme that manifests itself in classical literature as well as in the era of social media. In the literary work Madame Bovary (1856), Gustave Flaubert explores Emma Bovary’s chronic dissatisfaction with her ordinary life and her search for an unattainable romantic ideal.

The work captures the essence of the human condition and anticipates modern dissatisfaction. Emma personifies the struggle against mediocrity and the search for romantic idealizations, fueled by readings that make her despise life with her husband, Charles Bovary. His search for escape through romantic adventures and reckless luxuries culminates in financial and emotional ruin, illustrating the consequences of dissatisfaction perpetuated by illusions. Emma’s experience reflects the modern human condition, where the idealizations conveyed by social media cause similar dissatisfaction.

The social networks amplify dissatisfaction with real life by presenting a filtered and embellished reality, where moments of joy are exaggerated, creating a distorted perception of the lives of others. This constant comparison with seemingly perfect lives can increase feelings of inadequacy, failure, envy and dissatisfaction. Especially among young people, comparison with the highlights represented online by YouTubers and influencers leads to low self-esteem and feelings of inadequacy. Continued exposure to these unattainable ideals creates a vicious cycle of comparison and dissatisfaction, similar to that experienced by Emma Bovary.

The social networks promote a constant search for validation through likes, comments and shares, especially among young people. Lack of online recognition can cause feelings of rejection and exclusion, self-harm as a temporary relief mechanism for emotional pain, and worsen toxic social network dynamics. Hyperconnectivity and fear of missing out (FOMO: Fear of Missing Out) contribute to constant anxiety. Prolonged exposure to competitive online environments can trigger or worsen depression, leading to hopelessness, disinterest in previously enjoyable activities and, in extreme cases, suicidal thoughts.

Against the wave of dissatisfaction fueled by illusions, holiness in everyday life emerges as an effective remedy, enhancing the simple and genuine joys of everyday life, fruits of divine goodness. This concept promotes a more conscious and grateful approach to reality, focusing on the present and the small blessings that are often overlooked. He proposes accepting life as it is, cultivating gratitude and presence instead of desiring alternative realities:

«I like to see holiness in God’s patient people […] in parents who raise their children with love, in workers, in the sick , in the elderly consecrated women who continue to smile» (Holy Father Francis, Rejoice and rejoice, n.7).

The analysis of perennial dissatisfaction, from the literary perspective of “Madame Bovary” to manifestations in the era of social networks, reveals a constant challenge of the human condition: the search for satisfaction amidst often unrealistic expectations. The sanctity of the front door emerges as a powerful response to this dilemma, offering a path to a genuine appreciation of life in its simplest and most authentic forms.

I conclude with an appeal to my confreres priests and the ecclesiastics auctority of the Christ’s Church, so that many young people do not suffer the same tragic fate as Emma Bovary: let’s wake up to this situation!

Jundiaì, 2 January 2025

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Read more

The visible Church of the Patches passes in a wheelchair the Holy Door of irreversible decadence (Italian, english, español)

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

 

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY DOOR OF IRREVERSIBLE DECAY ON A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm shift: the Church of twenty-five years ago, even though she was already seriously ill, he tried to force himself to open, to open the doors to Christ; today's, patient in the department for terminally ill cancer patients, he tried to open, to open the doors to the world.

—Ecclesiastical current affairs—

.

 

PDF print format article

PDF article print format

PDF article for empriminr

.

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, if anything, we are increasingly incapable of reading the signs. And so, twenty-five years apart, two Supreme Pontiffs have opened the Door of the Holy Year, arriving before it with the weight of old age and their disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, the visible Church led by John Paul II arrived seriously ill before the Holy Door. This Pontiff debilitated by Parkinson's disease was a plastic paradigm of this, who was aided by a master of ceremonies dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical robe, he wanted to kneel anyway, albeit with obvious difficulty and great physical suffering. Never did he agree to waive the genuflections, especially before the Most Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion the Holy Father was dressed with a blanket which precedes the birth of the by centuries Christianitas. A wallpaper known in ancient times religion Roman pagan as downpipe, used by Pontifex Maximus to shelter from the rain, when from the top of Sublicio Bridge, located between the current Trastevere and Testaccio districts, at Porta Portese, he studied the movements of the waters and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of 2000 the Holy Father wore a cope on which much criticism was leveled. That save, packaged in Prato, it had been woven in very bright colors: rosso, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. Red tends to symbolize life and strength; blue is the union between sky and earth; yellow the divinity.

Reflecting on it in hindsight, that play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the dark gray that envelops us today and which cannot be attributed either to him or to the Supreme Pontiffs who have succeeded him since 2005 following, because the crisis of the Church begins from afar. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough - in this world that with memories only reaches yesterday, given that it doesn't even reach the day before yesterday - to understand that the seeds of the crisis giving rise to ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical decadence, boldly visible today, they were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius, between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century.

If with John Paul II the disease was pressing at the door, with the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church has gone beyond it, entering a point of no return, pushed onto a wheelchair by the shadow of a gaunt priest clad in a pair of trousers, rather than with a dignified ecclesiastical dress. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church that has already been in crisis for decades, he always knelt before the Body and Blood of Christ, fighting against the unavoidable worsening of the disease. Francis's does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because she was now seriously ill and irreversibly ill. But he kneels down to wash and kiss the feet of convicts and prostitutes Mass of the Lord's Supper, despising the richness of our glorious places of worship, which are not the fruit of princely splendor, as some uneducated people might think, but of the faith of believers and the work of the greatest artists who with them wanted to honor God, offering the best and paying the maximum that could be paid to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. This is why the abbreviation D.O.M is carved on many ecclesiastical buildings., what does it mean: God is the Greatest. However, on the one hand there is contempt for what is not known, on the other hand there is no hesitation in glorifying prisons, in which one ends up having committed crimes, except in cases of innocent people unjustly convicted of judicial errors, or in the cases of the prisons of anti-democratic dictatorial regimes. Although some don't remember it, or they are not really aware of this incontrovertible reality, it is worth reminding them that criminals end up in prison.

How many are inside the prisons can be recovered from the company, after a re-education process, not exalted as if they were faithful devotees of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of bad society, guilty of not having fully understood them. If I'm in there someone, out, often more than one, sometimes even entire families, because of them they cried. It would therefore be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on the spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace which first forms and then transforms man through the expiation of what the laws of the State indicate as crimes, Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both as regards crimes and as regards sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church itself, they offer differently, but substantially similar, the possibility of atonement, which in itself implies that recovery which erases the guilt deriving from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is just surreal and harmful ideology, between foot rinses and "prisoner jubilees" of a Supreme Pontiff who arrives in front of the Holy Door in the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter being pushed in a wheelchair by an emaciated priest in trousers, because in that case he is unable to get up and walk. But he gets up and walks to pass the open Holy Door in the Rebibbia prison, comparing it to a basilica (cf.. video WHO). Someone wants to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs killed in hatred of faith and that the title basilica is not particularly suitable for a prison chapel? And right here the words of the Psalmist come to mind:

Until, man, you will continue to forget me?
Until you hide your face from me?
As long as I feel trouble in my soul,
sadness in my heart every moment?
Until the enemy triumphs over me?

Guard, answer me, Lord my God,
keep the light in my eyes,
so that the sleep of death does not surprise me,
so that my enemy does not say: «I won it!»
and let not my adversaries rejoice when I falter (Salmo 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called Holy Year, it has a great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. The heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and punishments for sins. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel. The official website of the Holy See provides a excursus history that I recommend reading (cf.. What is the Jubilee). It is so precise and well done that further explanation is unnecessary, because for my part I could only repeat what is contained and explained in it.

Now I would like to move from the spiritual sphere to the financial one, starting from the premise that I hope to be wrong in some of my personal beliefs and to have to make public amends for them in the following months. In fact, I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm shift: the Church of twenty-five years ago, even though she was already seriously ill, he tried to force himself to open, to open the doors to Christ (cf.. WHO); today's, patient in the department for terminally ill cancer patients, he tried to open, to open the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, the task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to counter it:

"If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you from the world, that's why the world hates you " (GV 15, 19).

Often images can summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For instance: what about the episcopessa Protestant sitting in the places of honor with the exponents of the various religions? But we are inclusive! Because of this, just to exclude everything that is Catholic, of necessity we must include everything that is not Catholic... of course, all expressed with due human respect for that Lady present in the grandstand as "bishop" in the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter, without any of the clerical leaders realizing that in this way we run the risk of letting a message of normalization and approval pass through, given that a woman cannot define herself as a "bishop" and that no one, on the Catholic side, can somehow recognize it as such, even if belonging to a non-Catholic Christian religion born from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, who we remember was a heretic, not a reformer.

Luther did not produce any reforms at all, that was done by the Fathers at the Council of Trent, he tore the Church of Christ apart with a terrible schism, which remains so today, with all due respect to bishop in the grandstand at the opening of the Holy Year above the tomb of the Apostle Peter in the total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

We were talking about the economic discussion... for the Jubilee of 2000 the law decree of 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing «Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000», then converted into the law of 23 December 1996, n. 651. Work began on that event years before, subject to the passing of specific laws, but above all an astronomical sum of money was allocated: 3.500 billions of old lire, corresponding in today's money to one billion eight hundred million euros. Also in this case I refer to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, where everything is documented and detailed (cf.. WHO). Having said this, it should be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops of the time was Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, with an army of bishops following him who were not yet today's caricatures who compete with each other to see who wears the humblest and poorest wooden cross around their neck, possibly made with the material of a boat sunk off the coast of Lampedusa on which human traffickers transported poor desperate illegal immigrants, often including women and children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of 2000 it was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate... but above all another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. But here is an exhaustive example that can clarify everything: at the time, in Italy, if before the administrative elections some diocesan bishop expressed discontent towards one or some particularly polemical or aggressive candidates, these took care of correcting the aim and lowering the tone during the electoral campaign. But there's more: when in June of 2005 there was a referendum in Italy on assisted procreation, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go to vote. Outcome: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a fiasco (cf.. WHO). The fact that you personally appreciate and recognize certain evident and undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, regretting that today, figures of his high stature, unfortunately we no longer have any, nothing takes away from the fact that I would never have hoped to have him as my diocesan bishop. In fact, I still continue to consider it today, on a human and spiritual level, like "a cold dry bone covered in velvet", I had to define it as such, much to his little joy, a few years ago, oblivious on my part to how notoriously touchy he is, as well as having no sense of humor.

With completely different men and a completely different kind of Church, on the occasion of the great jubilee event of 2000, Rome was made new again. This is in the interest of the State, who recovered what was invested with high income and both economic and image interests, but also of the Church, which, thanks to the huge funds allocated for that extraordinary event, was able to take advantage of it to renovate most of its structures, many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here it should be remembered that Rome, even then, it was teeming with religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See. Works mostly erected in the 1930s, in a real competition between the historical Orders and the various religious Congregations, male and female, to those who built the largest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic drop in birth rate that began at the end of the 1960s, certain Catholic schools, nursery schools and various care institutions, they no longer had any reason to exist, being mostly pharaonic structures. It should then be considered that in 1978 that great social achievement of the law on abortion was approved, thanks to which even the orphanages disappeared, which was no longer needed, given that children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous curiae and general houses of the various male and female Orders and Congregations, almost always with novitiates or theological student houses within them, that led them to have, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one hundred or two hundred religious, between those who had professed solemn vows and the young simply professed people in training.

In Rome at the beginning of the seventies it was impossible not to meet everywhere, along the courses of urban streets, priests and nuns, friars and nuns. Then there were the young seminarians and theology students from the various national and international Roman seminaries and colleges, who when they went for a walk formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. Soon said: the decline in birth rates and the inexorable crisis in vocations had reduced in the following decades, most of these large structures, to be inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred, but by six or seven elderly religious men or women, with the buildings now in a state of semi-dilapidation, with obsolete systems and outside of all safety regulations. Thus it was that on the occasion of the Jubilee of 2000, not only were most of these institutions renovated, because it was decided to make them an income in some way, reserving a small wing for religious men and women now numerically reduced to a minimum and changing the bulk of the buildings into shelters, in fact in hotels, because that is what most of these institutes are today. It was a farsighted operation, thanks to which the buildings of many institutes were saved and put in a position to produce the necessary money to support themselves.

Unfortunately priests, brothers and sisters, they are capable - and truly are like few others - of throwing money away on useless expenses, sometimes even in harmful works from which great losses then arise, without having the ability to realize that certain structures require great care and careful maintenance. And so, twenty-five years ago, after being taken out of very serious trouble, faced with problems related to their large buildings which they were unable to restore, nor to store it adequately, nor to comply with legal regulations regarding safety, they found nothing better to do than to let them return to a state of semi-dilapidation over the next twenty-five years, not everybody, but most of it yes. This is what I usually call “clerical patch psychology”. The meaning of this definition will soon be revealed: a structure requires routine maintenance? Why ever spend money, just let it go, if anything saying, with all the typical and at times unique cynicism of priests, brothers and sisters: «It's not worth getting bitter blood unnecessarily, those who come after will then take care of it". A quel point, all ordinary maintenance operations omitted over the years, will end up turning into serious extraordinary maintenance needs, but it costs a lot. A quel point, the well-known priest-friar-nun foresight begins to attach patches to the right and left, if anything, spending exorbitant amounts in the belief of saving money, because there are few like priests, friars and nuns are such idiots to get cheated out of money, if they have not been adequately trained in concrete practical life with their feet firmly planted on the ground. Said and done: the walls were last whitewashed twenty years ago? Internal and external fixtures, air conditioners and radiators, the sanitary fixtures installed at the end of the 1990s and so on, on which the necessary ordinary maintenance interventions have never been carried out, today they are falling apart? No worries, a patch is attached, if anything - needless to say! — having the work done by people who, to change simple filters on air conditioners, they make the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns pay more than what the latest generation low consumption and high energy saving systems would cost.

Since there would be many examples I'll limit myself to just one: last year I had the opportunity to find myself in a nuns' institute while some painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled entirely of toxic chemical substances, I asked: «What brand of eco-friendly paint are you using?». After that, walking around the corridors, I noticed a riot of smudges not only on the walls, but also on the fixtures, on skirting boards and even on fire extinguishers dirtied with paint flows. I took the foreman and told him: «If law, in my house, had done something like that, I didn't let her out the door but out the window, I'm careful not to give her a single penny". the sera, the mother superior, she confronted me irritably and told me not to disturb their workers anymore. I answered her: «Of the people who placed the water drains of the air conditioners inside the shower cubicles of the guest bedrooms and who, not satisfied, even eliminated the earthing from the electrical system, they don't deserve to be called workers but criminals, while you demonstrate that you are only poor people incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace of being able to benefit".

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers inaugurated what we could reasonably define as "The Jubilee of the Patch" placed on our irreversible spiritual and financial decadence, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. Or perhaps someone forgets that the 24 December 1999 St. Peter's Square wasn't just packed, because the crowd of people reached Castel Sant'Angelo and the Lungotevere? Someone wants to deal with the fact as evident as it is sad that the 24 December 2024, as shown in the photo accompanying this article, the square itself was completely empty in the center and in the four squares of chairs placed under the steps of the churchyard, many empty seats are visible?

The final question is of rigor: a devout Catholic, why he should leave from Australia or Peru to travel to Rome? Perhaps to hear an elderly Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, talks about the poor and migrants, of migrants and the poor, of the poor and migrants...? As if the Word of God had come into this world only to speak and care for the poor of slums and those of Villas miseries (Villages of poverty)? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, they are also children of God, oppure no? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? He would find the homeless camped under Bernini's colonnade; would find Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter's Square respectively, where early in the morning traders are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to remove the acidic smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils in a nauseating way. And where should the jubilant pilgrim stay? Perhaps by the nuns or friars who after the Jubilee of 2000, once they had their structures rebuilt for free by the "Uncle Scrooge" of the Italian Republic, they have never asked themselves the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the bathroom fixtures; to repaint the plaster and paint the walls; who for breakfast offer you freeze-dried milk and substitute powders that rival the products put on the market during the period in which the old fascist regime proclaimed autarky, following which it was no longer possible to use foreign imported products, starting with coffee? Let's overlook the terrible quality of the food, in these houses which also offer meal service. Above all, we ignore the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries and taken to the religious houses of Rome and placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun as laborers equal to service women., which must be addressed in English, because despite living in Italy for ten years I am unable to understand and speak Italian. Let's fly over and draw a compassionate veil over all this and everything even worse that is circulating in certain houses...

At the end, how can we not mention the exotic characters who increasingly happen to be found working in shelters, especially the nuns, ranging from girls with bare bellies to boys sporting three bells in their ears, the piercing and the tattoos in plain sight? Of the series: we want to host pilgrims in religious reception homes, or in unsuccessful branches of the famous Muccassassina gay club in Rome? How come to the Holy See, sometimes even attentive to futilities, it hasn't yet occurred to us to send inspectors around to check whether certain houses are run by religious men and women, or by their lay representatives, they truly have all the necessary requirements to provide so-called religious hospitality in a dignified way?

Having opened the Holy Door in Rebibbia prison it was timely and far-sighted in its own way, being the most suitable place where many of us should be, and even for a long time, after having made an attack on the mystical body of Christ which is the Church (cf.. With the 1,18), on which today patches are stuck on day by day, which, however, cannot stop, let alone cure, the malignant metastases that have been circulating in his body for decades and decades, without this pontificate being blamed for them, who is not responsible for it, despite having done his, without backing down to the damage that has already largely existed for several decades, he decided to add others, as original as they are serious.

"But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth?» (LC 18, 8)

 

the Island of Patmos, 31 December 2024

.

_________________________

.

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY DOOR OF IRREVERSIBLE DECADENCE ON A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door opened, not so much on what we are not longer, worse! On what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite al-ready being seriously ill, tried to open, to throw open the doors to Christ; the Church’s today, a patient in the ward for terminal-ly patients, has tried to open, to throw open the doors to the world.

 

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, if anything we are increasingly incapable of reading the signs. And so, twenty-five years apart from each other, two Supreme Pontiffs opened the Door of the Holy Year, both with the weight of their seniority and their disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, the visible Church led by John Paul II appeared seriously ill in front of the Holy Door. This Pontiff, debilitated by Parkinson’s disease, was a clear example of this: aided by a master of ceremonies, dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical robe, he still wanted to kneel, albeit with obvious difficulty and great physical suffering. The Holy Father never agreed to give up genuflections, especially before the Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion the Holy Father was dressed in a cloak that precedes the birth of Christianity by centuries. A cloak known in the ancient Roman pagan religion as a “pluvial”, used by the Pontifex Maximus, starting from the 6th century BC, to protect himself from the rain, when from the top of the Sublicio Bridge, located between the current Roman districts of Trastevere and Testaccio, to the height of Porta Portese, he studied the movements of water and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of 2000 the Holy Father wore a cope which received much criticism. That liturgical vestment, made in the italian city of Prato, was woven with very bright colors: red, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. The red tends to symbolize life and strength; the blue the union between sky and earth; the yellow the divinity.

If we reflect on it in the present, that play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the dark-gray that envelops us today and which cannot be attributed either to him or to the Supreme Pontiffs who succeeded him from 2005 onwards, because the crisis of the Church begins from afar. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough — in this world which with memories barely reaches yesterday, given that it doesn’t even reach the day before yesterday — to understand that the seeds of the crisis ecclesiasial and ecclesiastical decadence, visible today, were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius X, between the end nineteenth century and the beginning twentieth century.

If with John Paul II the disease pressed in front of the door, with the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church has gone beyond it, entering a point of no return, pushed on a wheelchair by the shadow of a gaunt priest dressed in a pair of trousers, rather than with a dignified ecclesiastical robe. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church in crisis for decades, always tried to kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, trying not to become irreversibly ill. Francis’s does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because she is now seriously and irreversibly ill. However, he kneels down to wash and kiss the feet of convicts and prostitutes at the Mass of the Lord's Supper (Mass of the Lord’s Supper), despising the richness of our glorious places of worship, which are not the fruit of princely splendor, as some uneducated people might think, but of faith of believers and of the work of the greatest artists who with wanted to honor God offering the best and the maximum that could be paid to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all visible and invisible things. This is why the abbreviation D.O.M, which means: God is the Greatest (to God we always offer the best and the maximum), carved on many ecclesiastical buildings. However, if on the one hand there is contempt for what is not known, on the other there is no hesitation in glorifying prisons, in which one ends up having committed crimes, except in cases of innocent people unjustly convicted due to judicial errors, or in the cases of the prisons of anti-democratic dictatorial regimes. Although some do not remember it, or are not aware of this incontrovertible reality, it is worth reminding them that criminals end up in prison.

Those inside prisons must be recovered, not exalted as if they were devoted builders of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of the bad society guilty of not having fully understood them. If one is in there, you need to remember that outside, someone, often more than one, sometimes even entire families, have cried of cause him. It would therefore be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on a spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace which first forms and then transforms the man through the expiation of those that human law indicates as crimes, Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both as regards crimes and as regards sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church for its part, offer the possibility of atoning in a different but essentially similar way, which it implies that healing which erases the guilt deriving from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is just surreal and harmful ideology, between eccentric foot-washing to prisoners and prostitutes in the Mass of the Lord's Supper, and the ‘prison jubilees’ of a Supreme Pontiff who arrives before the Holy Door of the Papal Archbasilica of St Peter’s in a wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers, because he cannot get up and walk; yet he gets up and walks two days later to cross the Holy Door opened in Rome’s Rebibbia prison, where he compares the prison chapel to a basilica (see video HERE). Does anyone want to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs killed in hatred of the faith (hatred of faith) and that, for this reason, the title of basilica is not appropriate for a prison chapel? And right here the words of the Psalmist come to mind:

How long must I take counsel in my soul and have sorrow in my heart all the day?
How long shall my enemy be exalted over me?

Consider and answer me, O Lord my God; light up my eyes,
lest I sleep the sleep of death,
lest my enemy say, “I have prevailed over him,”
lest my foes rejoice because I am shaken.

But I have trusted in your steadfast love;
my heart shall rejoice in your salvation (Psalm 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called the Holy Year, has a great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. Heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and cancellation of the sentence. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel. The official website of the Holy See provides a historical excursus that I recommend reading (see: What is the Jubilee). It is so precise and well done that further explanations are superfluous, because for my part I could only repeat what is contained and explained in it.

Now I would like to move from the spiritual to the financial sphere, starting from the assumption that I hope to be wrong in some of my personal beliefs, and to publicly ask for forgiveness for them in the following months. I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much on what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite already being seriously ill, tried to force itself to open, to throw open the doors to Christ (see HERE); the Church of today is in the ward for terminally ill cancer patients, because has tried to open, to throw open the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, the task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to oppose it:

«If you were of the world, you would be loved by the world: but because you are not of the world, but I have taken you out of the world, you are hated by the world» (John 15:19).

Often images can summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For example: the Protestant woman bishop in places of honor among the exponents of the various religions. But let’s be inclusive! In fact, to exclude everything that is Catholic, it is necessary to necessarily include everything that is not Catholic… All expressed with due human respect for that Lady present as “bishop” in the Pontifical Archbasilica of St. Peter. The leaders ecclesiastics don’t realize that in this way they risk transmitting a message of normalization and approval, given that a woman cannot define herself as a “bishop” and that no one on the Catholic side can in any way recognize her as such. It should not be forgotten that this Lady belongs to a non-Catholic Christian religion born in the 16th century from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, who we remember was a heretic, not a reformer.

Luther did not produce any reforms. The true and only reform was made by the Fathers of the Council of Trent. Luther tore apart the Church of Christ with a terrible schism, which remains so even today, with all due respect to the Protestant women-bishops welcomed into places of honor for the opening of the Holy Year on the tomb of the apostle Peter. All this in total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

But let’s get to the economic question. For the Jubilee of 2000, work in Rome had begun years earlier. Specific laws have also been approved: Legislative Decree 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing «Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000», later converted into law 23 December 1996, n. 651. Above all, an astronomical sum of money was allocated: 3,500 billion of the old lire, corresponding in today’s money to one billion and eight hundred million euros (approximately 1,878,000,000.00 USD). Also in this case I refer you to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport of the Italian Republic, where everything is documented and detailed (see HERE). Having said this, it should be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops of the time was His Eminence the Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, with an army of bishops following him who were not caricatures like today’s bishops, who compete between of them to those who carry on their chest the humblest and poorest wooden cross, made with the material of a sunken boat off the sicilian coast of Lampedusa isla on which human traffickers transported poor desperate illegal immigrants, including women and innocents children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of 2000 was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate… but above all another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. But here is an exhaustive example capable of clarifying everything: at the time, in Italy, if before the administrative elections some diocesan bishop expressed discontent towards a particularly polemical or aggressive candidate, immediately the candidate corrected his tone during the electoral campaign. But there’s more: when the referendum on assisted procreation was held in Italy in June 2005, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go and vote. Result: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a flop (see HERE). The fact that I appreciate and recognize certain undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, stating that today, unfortunately, we no longer have figures of his high level, does not take anything away from the fact that I would never have hoped to have him as my diocesan bishop. Even today, on a human and spiritual level, I continue to consider it “a cold and dry bone covered in velvet”. This is how I defined him, to his scant joy, a few years ago, without caring how notoriously touchy and humorless the Cardinal is.

With completely different men and a completely different kind of Church, on the occasion of the great Jubilee event of 2000, Rome was remade new. This was in the interest of the State, which recovered what it had invested with high revenues and both economic and image interests, but also of the Church, which thanks to the huge funds allocated for that extraordinary event was able to take advantage of renovate most of its structures, many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here it should be remembered that Rome, already at the time, was teeming with religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See (in 1929, after the fall of the Papal State and the conquest of Rome in September 1870, the Kingdom of Italy recognized the Vatican City as an independent sovereign state governed by the Roman Pontiff). Works mostly erected in the 1930s, in a real competition between the historical Orders and the various religious Congregations, male and female, to see who built the largest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic decline in the birth rate that began at the end of the 1960s, certain Catholic schools, nursery schools and various care institutions no longer had any reason to exist, as they were mostly pharaonic structures. It should also be considered that in 1978, in Italy, the “great social conquest” of the law on abortion was approved, thanks to which orphanages also disappeared, for which no longer any need, given that children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous general houses of the various male and female Orders and Congregations, with novitiates or theological school within them, which led them to have, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one hundred or two hundred religious, among those who had professed solemn vows and the young simply professed people in training.

In Rome, at the beginning of the seventies, it was impossible not to encounter priests, friars and nuns everywhere along the urban streets. Then there were the young seminarians and theology students from the various national and international Roman seminaries and colleges, who when they went for a walk formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. In simple words: the decline in the birth rate and the inexorable crisis of vocations had reduced the majority of these large structures in the following decades to being inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred, but by six or seven elderly men and women religious, residing in buildings which were now in semi-degraded state, with obsolete systems and outside of any legal regulations regarding safety. So it was that on the occasion of the Jubilee of 2000, not only were a large part of these institutes renovated, but it was decided to make them profitable in some way, reserving a small wing for men and women religious, now reduced to a few members, and all the rest used for holiday home, in fact in hotels, because this is what most of these institutions are today: low-cost hotels. It was a far-sighted operation, thanks to which the buildings of many institutions were saved and made capable of producing the money necessary for their maintenance.

Unfortunately, priests, friars and nuns are capable — and they really are like few others — of wasting money on useless expenses, sometimes even on harmful works which then lead to great losses, without having the ability to realize that certain structures require a lot of care and maintenance. And so, the well-known sapience of priests, friars and nuns begins to attach patches left and right, spending exorbitant amounts in the belief of saving money, because few like priests, friars and nuns are so idiotic as to let themselves be robbed, if they have not been adequately trained in concrete practical life with their feet firmly planted on the ground. All said and done: were the walls, last painted twenty years ago? The internal and external fixtures, the air conditioners and radiators, the sanitar elements dilapidated and broken today fixtures, on which the necessary routine maintenance, has never been carried out they were installed in the late 90s? No problem, just apply a patch, entrusting the repairs to people who, to change banal filters on air conditioners, make the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns pay more than what the new latest generation air conditioners with low consumption and high energy savings would cost.

Since there are many examples, I will limit myself to just one: last year I had the opportunity to find myself in a nuns institute while some painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water, and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled entirely of toxic chemical substances, I asked: “What brand of ecological paint are you using?”. Then, walking around the corridors, I noticed a riot of smudges not only on the walls, but also on the fixtures, on the skirting boards and even on the fire extinguishers dirtied with paint flows. I took the foreman and told him: “If you had done something like this in my house, I wouldn’t have let you out through the door but through the window, being careful not to give you a single penny.” In the evening, the mother superior confronted me irritably and told me not to disturb their workers anymore. I replied to her: «The people who placed the water drains from the air conditioners inside the shower cubicles of the guest bedrooms and who, not satisfied, even eliminated the earthing from the electrical system, do not deserve to be called workers but criminals, while you nuns demonstrate that you are womens incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace of being able to benefit”.

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers inaugurates what we might reasonably call “The Jubilee of patch” focused on our irreversible spiritual and economic decadence, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. On 24 December 1999, the square of St. Peter’s, was not only packed, because the crowd of people reached as far as Castel Sant’Angelo. Same way, it is equally evident that on December 24, 2024 (as shown in the photo accompanying this article), the same square was completely empty in the central part, and in the four squares of chairs placed under the churchyard, several empty seats are visible.

The last question is obligatory: why should a devout Catholic leave Australia or Peru to go to Rome? Perhaps for hear an elderly Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, speaks only of poor and migrants, of migrants and poor, of poor and migrants…? As if the Verb of God had come into this world only to speak and care for the poor of the “slums” and “Villas miseries” (Villages of misery)? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, are they also sons of God, or not? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? The clochards under Bernini’s colonnade; Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, respectively to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter’s Square, where early in the morning traders are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to remove the acidic smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils nauseatingly? And where should the jubilant pilgrim lodge? Perhaps by the nuns or friars who after the Jubilee of 2000, once they had their religiouse homes renovated free of charge by the “Uncle Scrooge” of the Italian Republic, never asked themselves the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the bathroom fixtures; restore the plaster and paint the walls; that they offer freeze-dried milk and substitute powders for breakfast that rival the products put on the market during the period in which the old fascist regime proclaimed autarky, following which it was no longer possible to use products imported, starting with coffee? Better not even to mention the very poor quality of the food they offer in these houses where they also serve meals. Better to ignore, for Christian charity’s sake, the problem of the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries and brought to the religious houses in Rome, placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun and used as serving women, who, despite living in Italy for ten years, are unable to understand and speak Italian. Let us overlook and draw a veil over all this and all the worst that circulates in certain homes…

Finally, how can we not mention the exotic characters that we working in this religious houses, especially in those of nuns, who vary from girls with bare bellies to boys who show off three earrings in their ears, piercings and tattoos view? But do we want to host pilgrims in religious homes, or in failed branches of a gay village? Why has it not yet occurred to the Holy See to send around inspectors to verify whether certain houses managed by men and women religious, or by their lay preposed, really have all the necessary requirements to do so-called religious reception in a dignified way?

Having opened the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia was appropriate and in its own way farsighted, being the most suitable place where many of us should be, and also for a long time, after having launched an attack on the mystical body of Christ which is the Church (Colossians 1,18), on which attached day after day patches that cannot stop, much less cure, the malignant metastases that have been circulating in his body for decades and decades. A state of affairs for which this pontificate is certainly not responsible, despite having done its part, without holding back when, to the damage that has already largely existed for several decades, it decided to add others, as original as they are serious.

«But when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?» (Luke 18, 8)

 

From the Island of Patmos, 28 December 2024

.

______________________________________

.

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY GATE OF IRREVERSIBLE DECADENCE IN A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure spiritually and economically, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite being seriously ill, tried to force himself to open, to open wide the doors to Christ; the Church of today, Lying like a patient in the oncology hospice, she has tried to open wide the doors to the world..

 

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, If perhaps we are increasingly incapable of reading certain signs. And so, twenty-five years apart, two Supreme Pontiffs opened the Door of the Holy Year, appearing before her with the weight of old age and her disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, The visible Church led by His Holiness John Paul II arrived seriously ill before the Holy Door. This Pontiff, weakened by Parkinson's disease, It was a plastic example of this.: assisted by a master of ceremonies dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical vestment, who wanted, in any case, kneel although with obvious difficulties and great physical suffering. He never agreed to make exceptions with genuflections, especially before the Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion, The Holy Father wore a mantum that precedes the birth of Christianitas by centuries. A cloak known in ancient Roman pagan religion as a “pluvial”, used by him Pontifex Maximus to shelter from the rain, when from the top of the Sublicio Bridge, located between the current neighborhoods of Trastevere and Testaccio, at the height of Porta Portese, He studied the movements of water and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of the year 2000, The Holy Father wore a cape about which much criticism was made. That garment, made in Prato, It had been woven in very bright colors: rojo, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. Red usually symbolizes life and strength.; the blue, the union of heaven and earth; the gold, divinity.

If we reflect on it in retrospect, That play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the gloomy grayness that surrounds us today.; and that it is not attributable to him, nor to the Supreme Pontiffs who succeeded him from 2005; because the crisis of the Church began a long time ago. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough — in this world with memories that barely reach back to yesterday, since we do not even reach the day before yesterday - to understand that the germs of the crisis that caused the ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical decline, blatantly visible today, They were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius, at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century.

If with John Paul II the illness pressed at the door, With the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church crossed a point of no return, pushed onto a wheelchair by the shadow of an emaciated priest dressed in a pair of pants, instead of a dignified ecclesiastical vestment. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church in crisis for decades, always tried to kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, trying not to get irreversibly sick. The Church of Francis does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because now she is seriously and irreversibly ill. However, He kneels to wash and kiss the feet of prisoners and prostitutes in the Mass of the Lord's Supper, despising the wealth of our glorious places of worship, that they are not the fruit of princely splendor — as some uncultured people might think — but of the faith of believers and the work of the greatest artists who wanted to honor God, offering the best, paying the highest homage that could be offered to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all visible and invisible things. That's why the abbreviation D.O.M, what does it mean: God is the Greatest, It is sculpted on many ecclesiastical buildings. If, on the one hand, what is not known is despised, on the other hand, there is no hesitation in exalting prisons, among those that end up having committed crimes, except the case of innocent people unjustly convicted due to judicial errors. Although some don't remember it, or are not really aware of this incontrovertible reality, It is worth reminding them that criminals end up in jail.

Those who are inside prisons must be recovered, not exalted as if they were faithful devotees of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of a bad society, guilty of not having fully understood them. If someone is in there, outside, often more than one, and sometimes even entire families, They have cried because of him. So, It would be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on the spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace that first forms and then transforms man through the atonement of those whom human law designates as crimes, and Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both in regard to crimes and sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church for its part, They offer differently, but substantially similar, the possibility of atonement, which implies in itself that recovery that erases the guilt derived from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is surreal and harmful ideology, between foot washing and “prisoners' jubilees” of a Supreme Pontiff arriving before the Holy Door of the Papal Archbasilica of Saint Peter pushed in a wheelchair by an emaciated priest in trousers, because in that case it is impossible to get up and walk. But he gets up and walks until he opens the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia, comparing it to a basilica (cf.. video WHO).

Does anyone want to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs cruelly murdered in hatred of faith (in hatred of the catholic faith) and that the title basilica is not particularly appropriate for a prison chapel? And this is where the words of the psalmist come to mind:

How long will I feel anguish in my soul and sadness in my heart, day after day? How long will my enemy triumph at my expense??
Señor, My God, look at me and answer me! Enlighten my eyes so that I don't sleep with the dead,
and let my enemy not say that he finished me, Nor will my adversaries rejoice to see me hesitate..
As for me, I trust in your goodness; I will know the joy of your salvation and I will sing to the Lord who has treated me well (Salmo 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called Holy Year, It has great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. The heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and the penalties for sins.. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel.. The official website of the Holy See offers a historical tour that I recommend reading (watch: What is the Jubilee?). It is a text so precise and well done that there are no more explanations, For my part I could only repeat what was contained and explained in it..

Now I would like to move from the spiritual sphere to the financial one., starting from the premise that I hope to be wrong in certain personal convictions and have to publicly correct them in the coming months. I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure spiritually and economically., because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm reversal: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite being seriously ill, tried to force himself to open, to open wide the doors to Christ (watch HERE); the Church of today, lying as a patient in the oncological hospice ward, has tried to open, to open wide the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, The task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to oppose him:

«If you were of the world, the world would love them as their own. But since they are not of the world, but I chose them and took them out of him, "the world hates them" (Juan 15,19).

Images can often summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For example: What to say about the Protestant episcopese sitting in the seats of honor along with representatives of different religions? But we are inclusive!! Therefore, to exclude everything that is Catholic, we must necessarily include everything that is not Catholic… of course, all obviously expressed with due human respect towards the Lady present on the podium as “obispo” in the Papal Archbishopric of St. Peter, without any of the clerical solons realizing that in this way we run the risk of letting through a message of normalization and approval, because a woman cannot define herself as “bishop” and nobody, on the catholic side, in no way can you recognize it as such, not even if it belongs to a non-Catholic Christian religion born from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, what we remember: He was a heretic and he was not a reformer.

Luther did not produce, in fact, some reform; the only true reform was carried out by the Fathers at the Council of Trent. Luther tore apart the Church of Christ with a terrible schism, which remains as is to this day, with due respect to the bishops on the platform of honor at the inauguration of the Holy Year, over the tomb of the apostle Peter, with the total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

We were talking about the economic discourse… for the Jubilee of 2000, The Decree Law of the 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing "Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000", later converted into law 23 December 1996, n. 651. Work for this event began years ago., after the approval of specific laws, but above all with the attribution of the astronomical sum of money: 3.500 billion of the old liras, which in current currency is equivalent to one thousand eight hundred million euros. Also in this case I refer to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, where everything is documented and detailed (watch HERE). That being said, It must be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops at that time was His Eminence Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, followed by an army of bishops who were not yet like the current caricatures, who compete with each other to see who carries the most humble and poor wooden cross on their chest, possibly made from material from a sunken ship off the coast of the Sicilian island Lampedusa; boats on which human traffickers transport poor illegal and desperate immigrants, among whom there are often women and children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of the 2000 It was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate… but above all, another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. Here is an exhaustive example capable of clarifying everything: in that period in Italy, if before the administrative elections any diocesan bishop expressed his dissatisfaction with one or more particularly controversial or aggressive candidates, They took measures to correct the objective and lower the tone during the course of their electoral campaigns.; but there is more: when in June 2005 There was a referendum in Italy on assisted procreation, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go to vote. Result: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a fiasco (watch HERE). The fact of personally appreciating and recognizing certain evident and undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, regretting that today figures of his high stature, unfortunately we no longer have, It takes nothing away from the fact that I would never have wanted to have him as a diocesan bishop.. In fact, I still consider it today., on a human and spiritual level, as “a cold, dry bone covered in velvet”, how I defined it, for your little joy, for a few years without repair, for my part, of anything he is notoriously susceptible to outside of lacking a sense of humor.

With all other types of men and all other types of Church completely different, on the occasion of the great jubilee event of the year 2000, Rome was made new. It was also the interest of the State, that he recovered everything he had invested with high income and interest, both economic and image, as the Church did, which thanks to the enormous funds allocated to that extraordinary event it was able to take advantage of to renovate most of its structures., many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here we must remember that Rome, Even then it was full of religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See (in it 1929, after the fall of the Papal State and the taking of Rome in September 1870; The Kingdom of Italy recognized Vatican City as an independent sovereign state governed by the Roman Pontiff). Works erected for the most part in the years 1930, in a true competition between the historical Orders and the different religious Congregations, male and female, to see who built the biggest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic decrease in the birth rate that began at the end of the years 1960, certain catholic schools, day care centers and various assistance institutions no longer had a reason to exist, since they were mostly pharaonic structures. It must also be considered that in the 1978 was approved in Italy “great social achievement” of the abortion law, thanks to which orphanages disappeared, no longer necessary, since children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous curias and general houses of the different male and female Orders and Congregations., almost always with novitiates or theology students inside, what led to having, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one or two hundred religious, between those who had professed solemn vows and the young simple professed in formation.

In Rome in the early seventies, it was impossible not to find priests, friars and nuns everywhere along the urban roads. There were also young seminarians and theology students from the different national and international seminaries and Roman schools., that when they went out for a walk they formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. In a nutshell: The decline in birth rates and the inexorable crisis of vocations had reduced, in the following decades, most of these large structures to being inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred., but by six or seven elderly men and women religious, with buildings that were now in a semi-ruinous state, with obsolete systems and outside of all legal regulations regarding security. So, on the occasion of the Jubilee of the year 2000, Not only were a large part of these institutes renovated, but it was decided to make them profitable in some way: reserving a small wing for religious men and women, now numerically reduced to a minimum and transforming the bulk of the buildings into hostels, actually in hotels, because that is what most of these institutions are today. It was a forward-thinking operation., Thanks to which the buildings of many institutes were saved and they were allowed to produce the money necessary to sustain themselves..

Unfortunately, priests, friars and nuns They are capable - and they really are like few others - of wasting money on useless expenses., sometimes even in harmful works that later cause great losses, without realizing that certain structures require a lot of care and careful maintenance. And so, twenty-five years ago after having been saved from very serious problems, related to their great buildings that they had not been able to restore, nor properly preserve, nor to adapt to legal standards regarding safety; They found nothing better to do than let them return to their semi-ruined state for the next twenty-five years., not all, but a good part of them do. This is what I usually call “clerical patch psychology.”. And it is easy to reveal the meaning of this definition: Does a structure require routine maintenance? Why spend money, just leave it like this, and just in case, say with all the cynicism typical and sometimes unique to priests, friars and nuns: “It's not worth the useless bitter blood, Those who will come later will take care of it”. At this point, all the ordinary maintenance interventions omitted over the years end up becoming serious needs for extraordinary maintenance, which however cost a lot. No problem, we will put a patch on it, entrusting the work to people who, to change the banal air conditioner filters, they will do that due to the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns are paid more than what they are paid in the latest generation systems, low consumption and high energy saving.

As there are many examples I will limit myself to just one: Last year I had the opportunity to find myself in an institute of nuns while painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled like toxic chemicals, I asked: “What brand of eco-friendly paint are you using??”. Then, as I walked through the hallways, I noticed an avalanche of stains not only on the walls, but also in furniture, on baseboards and even on fire extinguishers dirty with paint drips. I grabbed the foreman and told him: «If you had done something like that in my house, I wouldn't have let you out through the door but through the window., "taking care not to give you a cent". At night, The irritated Mother Superior told me not to bother the workers anymore.. I replied: «People who have placed water drains from air conditioners inside guest room showers and are not satisfied with that, They have even removed the outlets from the electrical system, They do not deserve to be called workers but criminals. While you nuns demonstrate that you are incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace to benefit.".

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated, pants-clad priest inaugurated what we could reasonably define as “Jubilee patch” focused on our irreversible spiritual and financial decline, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. Or maybe someone forgets that the 24 December 1999 St. Peter's Square was so full of people that the crowd of faithful reached the Castel Sant'Angelo and the Lungotevere? Someone wants to address the obvious and sad fact that the 24 December 2024, as shown in the photo accompanying this article, the same square was completely empty in the center and in the four squares of chairs placed under the steps of the basilica you can see so many empty seats.

One last question is essential.: Why would a devout Catholic leave Australia or Peru to travel to Rome?? To listen to an old Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, talks about poor and immigrants, of immigrants and poor, of poor and immigrants…? As if the Word of God had come to this world only to speak and care for the poor in the favelas and the Villas of misery?? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, They are also children of God, or not? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? I would find the vagabonds camped under Bernini's colonnade; would find Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, respectively to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter's Square, where early in the morning merchants are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to eliminate the sour smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils. in a nauseating way. And where should the jubilant pilgrim stay?? Perhaps where the nuns or friars who, after the Jubilee of the 2000, once he Uncle McDuck O Scrooge McDuck of the Italian Republic renewed its structures free of charge, They never considered the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the toilets.; restore the plaster and paint the walls; that offer freeze-dried milk and powdered substitutes for breakfast that rival the products marketed during the period in which the former fascist regime proclaimed autarky, after which it was no longer possible to use products imported from abroad, starting with coffee? Let's ignore the poor quality of the food that these houses offer as catering services.. Above all, Let us ignore the sad reality of the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries, taken to the religious houses of Rome and placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun as domestic servants, who should be addressed in English, because even if they have lived in Italy for ten years, they do not understand or speak Italian. Let us overlook and draw a compassionate veil over all this and all the worst that circulates in certain houses.…

And finally, How can we not mention the exotic characters that we increasingly find working in these religious reception houses?, especially in the nuns' houses, ranging from girls with bare bellies to boys who wear three earrings in their ears, piercings and tattoos in sight? From the series: Do we want to welcome pilgrims in religious houses of hospitality, Or do we want to transform religious houses into failed branches of a gay village?? How is it possible that the Holy See, sometimes even attentive to trivialities, It has not occurred to them to send inspectors to verify whether certain houses run by religious men and women, or by their lay supervisors, really meet all the necessary requirements for religious reception in a dignified manner?

Having opened the opening of the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia It was timely and farsighted in its own way., being the most appropriate place where many of us should be and even for a long time, after having attacked the mystical Body of Christ which is the Church (Colossians 1,18). A Holy Body on which today they are placed, day after day, patches that can't stop, much less cure, the malignant metastases that have been attacking him for decades. The metastases were not caused by this pontificate, who is not responsible for them, despite having done their part without stopping the damage that had already existed for several decades, decided instead to add others, so original, as equally serious.

"But, when the Son of man comes, Will you find faith on earth?» (Lucas 18,8)

 

From the Island of Patmos, 31 December 2024

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.