HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/padre-Aiel-piccola.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1 150 150 father ariel HTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.png father ariel2020-12-17 20:19:522021-06-06 18:51:22Almost certainly useless lesson for some self-taught Catholics on the secularism of the state: the concept of Natural Law of the revived neo-scholastics, besides not serving God and the truth, it is in radical conflict with the two foundations of the creation of man: freedom and free will
Almost certainly useless lesson for some self-taught Catholics on the secularism of the state: the concept of Natural Law of the revived neo-scholastics, besides not serving God and the truth, it is in radical conflict with the two foundations of the creation of man: freedom and free will
Latest posts by father ariel (see all)
- I am a theologian guardian of tradition in line with the thought of the theologian Andrea Grillo, intellectual honesty dictates it to me - 27 February 2023
- Over the centuries, sacramental confession has undergone radical changes that are great “theological doctors” of Facebook and Twitter ignore - 4 February 2023
- The civil juridical aspects of Communion on the hands in the face of the absurd legal actions undertaken by priests and bishops who deserve to be flogged in blood - 8 January 2023
I totally agree with what you have expressed on this page, and I tell you sincerely that the awareness of the daily martyrdom you have suffered at the hands of ignorant irrationalists has aroused in me deep sadness and pity towards you.
Such is the consonance between the positions you expressed and ours, that we decided to share this page on our Festa.Mondialista Facebook page, in order to make it visible and legible to ours 400.000 telematic followers.
I hope this short letter of mine, even if it will not be published, Bring them some’ of relief.
I would be very honored if you would like to take a look at our website http://www.mondialisti.net and communicate your authoritative opinion on our initiatives. I cannot promise a total application of the advice and indications that you may wish to provide us with, but I assure you that we will still take them into careful consideration.
With respectful regards
Mrs. Andrea Zuckerman
Grand Master of the Reborn Templar Order
Director General of the Mondialist Party
... yes, you are not sorry, they answer you in music:
Many comments have come to this article, unfortunately largely written by people who did not understand, others perhaps deliberately misunderstood.
There are those who write accusing me of being a supporter of abortion, who accuses me of supporting the legitimacy of divorce and so on. In the context of the accusations, the lightest and most tolerant are those of “modernist” ed “heretic”.
Anyone who can read what I wrote has understood very well that for me, come cattolico, priest and theologian divorce does not exist at all, with regard to religious marriage and the Sacrament of Matrimony. Despite having explained everything well with examples and clear speeches, not a few have totally overlooked the clear distinction I make between a sacrament of divine institution, indissoluble and impossible to undo, and a civil marriage contract signed before a public official of the state by non-Catholics, by non-believers or by secularists, which civil law cannot prevent, tomorrow, to cancel their contract, applying the criteria of indissolubility of religious marriage to civil marriage.
I acknowledge that Covid-19 is making some people more unreasonable, aggressive and above all more quarrelsome than they were previously on social media increasingly used as venting of the worst human instincts. But this does not allow him to comment with a total lack of scientific competence on strictly specialized topics that require deep knowledge in the historical context, philosophical, juridical and theological.
I also find it grotesque that some have even accused me of supporting the abortion law (!?) while with clear words that cannot be denied I explain in my text that there are no individual freedoms on the basis of which the suppression of an innocent human being can in any way be legitimized "never and in any case".
Messages have arrived from philosophers and jurists, together with those of various readers who express words of great appreciation and with detailed skills, along with excesses of esteem towards my person.
The Fathers de The Island of Patmos have always worked with great seriousness respecting people's opinions, even wrong opinions, even those at times irreverent and offensive towards us, that we have not hesitated several times to publish.
Unfortunately, in the face of not a few comments received which constitute a true insult to reason, to the doctrine and culture of knowledge in general, it is impossible to proceed with publication, because it would be dishonest if we only published the praise, trashing criticisms without logic and knowledge, because everyone must be given a voice, including those who use it inappropriately. As the criticisms came, as well as offensive they are irrational and far-fetched, we are therefore forced not to publish any comments, neither those who criticize nor those who praise.
We apologize to the readers who have written pertinent and interesting scientific comments, as well as flattering. I sincerely thank them for their words and count on their understanding after this explanation given.