Comments are closed.
The website of this magazine and the editions take name from the Aegean island in which the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse, isola also known as «the place of the last revelation»
«God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»
(in higher than the others, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)
The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma
Creator and editor of this magazine website:
MANUELA LUZZARDI
If Don Levi of Gualdo expects Bergoglio, so that it can be accused of heresy and apostasy, openly and explicitly deny the Catholic dogma, apparently he does not know how it acts the devil, that is, the more possibly by fraud and in the shadow, what is doing in fact Bergoglio. And if he considers “pastoral decision” the granting of the Communion for divorced and remarried what in reality is a heresy and secular three Sacraments mean that we speak of two “religions” diverse.
In which document the high teaching the Pope has granted the Communion for divorced and remarried? In an official document of the supreme magisterium it said that adultery is no longer sin and that those who live in a state of adultery have access to Eucharistic Communion?
If she tells me that the post-synodal exhortation love joy It can be confusing and ambiguous in many parts, know I'm the first to admit and even lamentarlo. But if you say that the Pope has made such a concession, I must tell you that no one has ever done.
For me personally, I would not hesitate to deny Communion to people who lived in the public state of marital irregularities known to all and myself known, unless they comply with the provisions of family Concosortio of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, specifically to n. 84.
If then – but it never happened – the Ecclesiastical Authority commanded me to give Communion to remarried divorcees, I rigetterei in command imperative of conscience, mindful of the fact that the Church is the guardian and dispenser of the sacraments, no mistress, because the sacraments are no assets available. Therefore, no ecclesiastical authority legitimately constituted, He can command me things contrary to the Holy Gospel and the teaching of the Church.
This very sporty – and she always practice this sport – to give the heretic to the Supreme Pontiff as you could scream “horned” the umpire during a game of their favorite team, It is not a way of being, to think and act as a Catholic.
Jesus knew what was in the care of Judah and why he had joined the disciples; nevertheless it holy Apostle and sat docilely by him to betray and hand over to the executioners.
To us, Christians these days maybe apocalyptic, Christ might well ask God to imitate him in accepting sacrifice with filial betrayal of an unnatural father and perhaps…like Judas also in another respect, namely that to which they refer to the Gospels when they inform us of WHO nell'Iscariote came after he had dipped the bread in the dish of Jesus…
But even if it were, should we not also we accept martyrdom, SUBJECT FIRM IN FAITH and praying for the traitor repent?
I realize that I may have exaggerated, in this case the comment or censored, if you have the time and desire, correct me.
Thank you.
Don Minutella seems to have gone insane. Things that are not shareable saying goes, particularly with regard to putting a cum, but perhaps Don Ariel what she says has value when the situation in the Church is normal. According to canon law, you are right about everything. Sooner or later, we should ask ourselves seriously whether canon law will still have value in the future, since everything else is jumping. Beyond all ambiguities, contradictions, misinformation, indiscretions, often it lies with which the Pope has troubled the consciences, we arrived at the terminal with the recent official statement of Abu Dhabi, that sounds like a formal declaration of apostasy. If someone weak in faith begins to ask themselves the dramatic doubt whether this pope still has some power of sacred jurisdiction, She wants to send him to hell? Doubts Hamlet without answers. Also because the answers do not have Minutella, but I fear not having even the Don Ariel essay. Remember when he was saying, Years ago: Simone who declined to be Peter, set her red shoes, and it will be us who criticize him today to defend etc.. ... in conscience ridirebbe today?
Dear Luigi,
I tell her why she turns to me, But know that the article in question was written by Fathers of The Island of Patmos all together, for a priestly consciousness speech, as they come to us from time many messages of its so-called readers if Minutella.
As she says, are years that certain things that I'm saying and writing,if I can add that many yesterday while branding me to be “pessimistic”, “tragic” and so on, today are the same ones who come to me saying: "You were right, the situation we are experiencing is unprecedented historical '. For my part I reply: "Sincerely, I am not at all happy “to be right”, if the reason we want to talk, because when years ago I wrote some things, I prayed and I was hoping to be wrong ".
Amongst the questions, I think I have responded in some articles written between the end of 2016 and early 2019. I give them to put them in order below, because in them is enclosed my so-called “evolution on the issue” unprecedented in the history of the Church :
https://isoladipatmos.com/stage/questo-pontificato-rischia-di-finire-a-fischi-in-piazza-e-fratture-drammatiche-il-sommo-pontefice-si-trova-in-serie-difficolta-nel-governo-della-chiesa/
https://isoladipatmos.com/stage/puo-un-romano-pontefice-legittimamente-eletto-e-successore-legittimo-del-beato-apostolo-pietro-essere-privo-della-grazia-di-stato/
https://isoladipatmos.com/stage/in-questa-terribile-notte-buia-per-il-nuovo-anno-2019-il-programma-di-lavoro-e-stato-dettato-a-lisola-di-patmos-dal-beato-apostolo-pietro-il-vostro-nemico-il-diavolo-come-leone-ruggente-va/
https://isoladipatmos.com/stage/la-grande-decadenza-e-il-silenzio-degli-innocenti-quando-per-proteggere-la-madre-e-la-famiglia-i-figli-devono-superare-la-grande-prova-di-fede-vivere-e-soffrire-come-se-il-padre-non-esis/
A heretic has no power to excommunicate a priest. The Bergoglio heresies are obvious but unfortunately, for that corticircuito’ Patmos Island continues to highlight, no lay person has the power to impose penalties and no cleric can draw conclusions from that for any other person would be inevitable.
This circuit is the worst things happened in Church History, I believe. Till now, No one intervenes because if will be even worse soon.
"The heresies are obvious" ?
And where, or better to say: come, When?
Possible that some people just the keyboard of a computer and a name that conceals an unidentifiable identity, Beading for public accusations of heresy to the Roman Pontiff, as if it was a joke between a speech and the other did the sports bar with friends?
You are confusing the pastoral choices of heresies, place that the one and the other are entirely different things.
Anyone, whether Bishop, Priest or layperson, It can criticize in due and respectful forms certain pastoral choices of the Roman Pontiff, defining them not opportune or not happy, also wanting ambiguous and harbingers of disorientation and confusion.
Heresy, however, is quite another thing.
Or perhaps it is that the reigning Pope has denied the incarnation of God's Word, the divine nature of Christ, his consubstantial with God the Father, the procession of the divine persons in Trinitarian theology, transubstantiation in the Holy Eucharist, the resurrection of Christ, his ascension to heaven, Immacolata conception …?
She finally says
"If Nobody intervenes it will soon be worse".
And where is the problem? She intervenes with the grace and the grace of the Holy Spirit saying that the legitimate successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter is actually a heretic and apostate.
The Church celebrated until now twenty councils, she can freely and legitimately convene and preside over the Council at its sports bar.
E’ thing entirely feasible.
Dear don Ariel,
good morning. You convinced me, I decided to convene the first ecumenical council at the sports bar in my neighborhood. Of course it will be the council of sheep and not the shepherds, we decided, and I have other sheep, to invite as an expert. Among other things we want to debate on the orthodoxy of the Supreme Pontiff Francis I. Francis or zero, boh .. At the Council we shall also discuss the issue of the number. We would like to ward off accusations of heresy and apostasy from the venerable name of the sovereign pontiff. To do so would be appropriate for you, as a dogmatic theologian, There would provide a detailed report where the light of two recent articles published on his online magazine. ” Be merciful, etc.… and Charlemagne who you say ... etc etc.” we prove that the official statement of the teacher of all the faithful in Abu Dhabi, that the diversity of religions is willed by God: is Catholic, It is consistent with the holy gospels and can be embraced with certain faith by all the faithful. If you want to participate in the council sessions, It will still have to stay at his own expense. It harbors from home cooked and stole, we don't have any.
Sincerely in Christ.
… make ironic with me, it's like to think you can go to make a burglary in the house of the chief of the clan Casamonica, in the certain knowledge to put off the coup successfully.
Anyhow, to know that I really liked and appreciated its tasty these paradoxical images, behind which lurks at least some truth, it would be foolish to deny it.
In fact I have never denied certain sorties confused, unhappy and ambiguous; and even I have never denied that a father can make children suffer, I also wrote recently. But, children, They can not react denied the father, even worse fatherhood in itself and by itself. What this hard to make it clear to not a few Catholics who think they can judge a Supreme Pontiff the same way that you might judge – as I explained recently – the president of a multinational company, thus falling in the worst vices and worldly charms, ie reducing a pontificate to a “I like it”, “I do not like”.
Mi tip, to Peter, after he denied Christ three times, which he did and then swearing swearing, she, She would leave him in office as Supreme Pontiff, or he would have deposed for unworthiness and apostasy from the faith in the Word of God had told him just before: «… You are rock and upon this rock I will build my Church "?.
Today we should understand more than ever the result of that phrase '… and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it ", because if the Church has survived betrayal and to Peter escapes, it means that from the start, Christ gave, He gave assurance that it would also survived the leaks and betrayals of all his successors.
As always it is a matter of faith, my dear, simple and pure faith …
I think one thing , there are none so deaf that will not hear. She writes that no , he is so, who goes with him…., so many things to striking that only some stupid can be enchanted by what he writes. His could be an artificial intelligence. But why not drop in content? It disproves what he says from the sacred texts, Director of this …..? Newspaper? There belies cones texts of the Roman Catholic Church that says Minutella, and then we'll talk from both professional
Simone Catalano
Dear Simone,
let me understand … if someone says – as we did – that when the sun rises and the moon the night falls on the ground, before what she asks us to bring clear and precise evidence that the moon high in the sky is really dark and the sun no longer shines?
What should I deny them "with the texts of the Church" before a priest:
1. It denies the legitimate election of the Roman Pontiff ;
2. She described him as a heretic, apostate usurper and the Chair of Peter ;
3. denies the validity of the Mass celebrated in communion with the one he names “false pope” e “Masonry puppet”;
And before this moon on the dark sky and before that by the moon ensues, she asks me to "go into the content" and to deny "the texts of the Roman Catholic Church that says Minutella"?
Believe me, dear Simone, she is a real phenomenon, I tell him with genuine sympathy, me because she really inspires tenderness.
This story was Benedict himself to recognize Bergoglio, and that it would demonstrate the validity, He feels for years. Unfortunately, But, this fact does not prove anything at all: you expect that a Pontiff forced abdication, perhaps with threats towards you or the Church, the next day hurry to shout urbi et orbi that its successor is an impostor? If Benedict has bowed to bullying, it is logical that recite their part to the full and publicly recognize the Pope as successor.
The resignation of Benedict are part of a political plan not Italian (e no, This not told me Minutella). And since things have changed since then, probably soon the truth will be made public.
… if things are as you say, good Minutella, in scientifically consistent way, before picking on "the false pope" and "the heretic and apostate Bergoglio", It should take it first, above all and first of all with Benedict XVI, that according to the thesis enunciated by her, It would then be the real and harmful responsible of what occurred, you don't think so?
And this will unfortunately be the next step in this furious: at a certain point, just to keep standing the theater of himself and the hole in which it is fallen, It will end up blaming Benedict XVI himself, in some of his speeches there are already all the conditions, It is that for the moment does not dare to name him and accuse him. For now his accusations are hidden behind the lines and behind the words.
Who are you referring Minutella when he speaks of "the shepherd who flees" or "frightened shepherd" or "Miss Shepherd»? [cf. video WHO].
To man Jorge Mario Bergoglio we can charge all defects, lexical and expressive ambiguities and we want all human limitatezze, But if there is an accusation that no one may address, He is accused of "Miss scared ', because of its high rate of male testosterone is beyond any possible discussion.
So to those who have turned these invectives minutelliane nameless entity specifically indicated?
Heresy now rampant, He puts the faithful who want to remain so in serious danger. When the fish stinks it stinks from the head says. Too many do Minutella will be out of a church far away now from faith and tradition. Meanwhile, the slaughter continues. Cardinals against Cardinals. Bishops against bishops. Priests against priests. The completely reversed doctrine. What has yet to happen? If you have to bite, mind at least not tear you. Remind you of anyone?
… of course, though I remember something and someone.
It would be enough that you read some of my articles, because it would discover how many times I called to this expression of the Blessed Apostle Paul. This I also did at the end of my last article [cf. WHO].
dear father Ariel
I would like to ask you: a faithful can criticize pope? This leaves me very reigning pope, We are very much perplexed 6 years that sows confusion and creates doubts,immigrazionista political ago, it seem normal?
dear fabio,
the Catholic Church is not – nor ever it was during its two thousand year history – the Stalinist Soviet regime, nor cambodian Pol Pot, nor that the dictator of North Korea, and so on …
During some councils, several popes have been criticized too harshly during discussions; Some councils were also interrupted and then resumed at intervals of several years in order to appease certain minds, or to prevent external influences by various potentates interested in condition from outside to inside various discussions. During the First Vatican Council, Blessed Pope Pius IX was made the subject of harsh criticism from several bishops, some of which, before the study on the proclamation of the dogma of papal infallibility in matters of doctrine and faith [cf. Dogmatic constitution The eternal shepherd], between the benches did run this entry: "He did not just be a Pope, now he wants to become an Eternal Father?». After the Vatican I then checked out the schism of the so-called Old Catholic who did not accept the proclamation of the dogma of infallibility. Exactly how after the Second Vatican II there was finally a schismatic act by the Bishop Marcel Lefebvre who did not accept some of the doctrines of this council, Although everyone thinks that his were purely liturgical questions, What not at all true, place Lefebvre, the document on liturgical reform, he signed it.
Repeatedly, in several of my articles I mentioned that during some sessions of the great dogmatic councils, the bishops are also taken to blows with each other, to the point that the Byzantine emperors They arranged a security service, so the soldiers – they could not enter in the council – But if you could access they fights broke out among the bishops.
So not only can criticize a Supreme Pontiff, but in some cases to criticize him or to recall his duties can be even imperative, they did also several Saints, Saint Bernard of Clairvaux at St. Catherine of Siena. St. Bernard also wrote a pamphlet entitled good treaty for each Pope who donated to Eugene III after his election, warning him about various things, one example among the many contained in that text:
"Can you show me one that has greeted your election without receiving money or no hope of receiving? And the more they have professed your servants, all the more they want to lord it over the Church".
To criticize a Supreme Pontiff, or warn him not recommended by elements from which he could surround himself, It is not insolence, but it is a duty, a real imperative of conscience, in certain cases.
We priests first, even though we are bound to the Bishop in perfect communion with the Bishop of Rome by a vow of obedience, we may find uncomfortable before certain decisions or pastoral decisions of the Bishop or the Roman Pontiff; and towards the one and the other, we could not feed estimated, I explained how the times. None of us, indeed, He never promised to Bishop “estimate”, none of us has ever promised “Bishop I will always funny”. Before the bishop to priests and Brothers gathered in front of the People of God, during a solemn public act that is the consecration of a new priest, We promised the Bishop in perfect communion with the Bishop of Rome: "Branch devout respect and obedience". And that is their due. The non-Stim, He is not due, but the obedience.
You can not estimate the reigning Pontiff, or feel uncomfortable in front of some of his pastoral choices, I assure you that is not the only one. What you can not do is deny the legitimate authority of the Roman Pontiff and obedience in faith that he is due to the mandate received from Christ the Lord.
And what a priest does not understand this, however, after what he says doctoral twice, as well understand, What is very serious.
Unfortunately, in a world in which prevails sentimental, l’moody and the subjective, people tend instead to act according to I like it O I do not like. But a Roman Pontiff does not enjoy, It must be followed and obeyed when he fulfills his role as the supreme teacher and guardian of the faith.
Another thing to Minutella escapes is the fact that the precise ecclesiastical law has always been that "the Holy Father can not be liable to judgment" and his "judicial and administrative decisions can not be appealed".
Because it can not be brought to trial? To the obvious and simple fact that the authority superior to him is only that of Christ God.
But unfortunately, in this climate of high society, where everything, Also part of believers, It is judged with socio-political categories, someone thinks that a Pope can resort to so-called impeachment with its process and judgment.
The minutelliana accusation that everyone is silent, bishops and priests, except the heroic charge from Madonna in person as Minutella declares with impunity and says, is a real aberration, or: a totally devoid of affirmation ratio.
All are silent for the simple fact that though a Pope may legitimately be criticized, it can also be bad and harmful, however, it can not be judged instead; and it may not be for the simple reason that there is no human authority in the world than him and above his office.
In the world of I like it e do not like, in the world of but I feel so I think, in the world of sentimental and of’emotional, this is perhaps difficult to digest, but it is our faith. A faith that no one is required to accept, but if one professes Catholic, must accept, otherwise it is rightly and deservedly incurred in excommunication as the Reverend Alexander Minutella, why nobody, above the authority of Peter, Peter can stand as judge after the fact self-proclaimed Catholic in his own way.
To deny to understand this, unfortunately I can not say more and more I can not add, if you do not lose unnecessary time to preach to the sands of the desert. With great sorrow for all those real or imagined Catholics who before this painful and sanctifying test of faith which the Church and all of us her children are subjected, act in a manner not Catholic, moody, sentimental and finally aggressive-destructive, almost as if the Church was a corporation governed by a president who can not work well and not like, therefore it can be processed, convicted and dismissed from the meeting of shareholders on charges of having damaged the share capital.
I forgot: I'm waiting by far 10 last January, The list of doctrinal heresies where
Don stumbled Minutella,. It seems dishonest to hide behind terms like this:
” anthology and serious doctrinal contradictions emerge, theological blunders and inaccuracies of all kinds, starting from a very embarrassing Mariology”.
If so, It should not be difficult to list at least a couple.
Thanks for your attention and an apology for the inconvenience!!!
I agree that in Don Minutella there is much that is not working, I do not know if the evil influence level, theological or simply darkening mental deficiency. What is certain is that it is a fact that saddens and a further sign of the times we live in great confusion.
E’ better one excommunicated a lekkakalzini like her.
Dear Reader,
between you and us there is a substantial difference: we always present you with our names and our increasingly assuming faces before God and before men responsible for what we say, but she falls into the thick internetici army of heroes who insult behind the heroic guarantee absolute anonymity.
And that said, Now tell us who are you, licking socks …
Thank you for these clarifications God bless you , I will continue to read your articles : unfortunately i “its followers” they do not want to listen and avoid confrontation even when faced with the truth ?,we just have to continue to pray