If homosexuality has invaded the College of Bishops, instead of writing letters to the Holy People of God, He should be stuck on the mother Church of Rome Cartel: “total failure sellout!” 24 August 201828 September 2018 isoladipatmos - Church news - IF THE RESERVOIR homosexuality HAS EVEN THE BOARD OF BISHOPS, INSTEAD OF WRITING LETTERS TO THE HOLY PEOPLE OF GOD he SHOULD BE STUCK ON THE MOTHER CHURCH OF ROME: "TOTAL CLEARANCE FOR BANKRUPTCY!». . In his Letter to the Holy People of God the Supreme Pontiff Francis I it looks good from clarifying that cases of widespread pedophilia among the clergy, each of which is intended to create devastating media effects, as well as damage to the victim atrocious, are real cases and found, but rare, because most of those listed as cases of pedophilia, in truth they are only cases of ephebophilia, ie routine practice of homosexuality by priests exercising that pure, simple, beautiful and protected exercise homosexual sexuality recognized as a genuine right from the Law itself. . . AuthorAriel S. Levi Gualdo . . PDF format Print article . . demand respect and rights insulting way in debunking Christianity and its most sacred symbols is now costume LGBT lobby. In the picture: Gay Pride From Rome, He started from the square outside the Cathedral of St. John Lateran episcopal see of the Bishop of Rome, and finally arrived at the Republic Square, formerly Piazza Exedra, where the ancient basilica of Saint Mary of the Angels and Martyrs, built on the ancient baths of Diocletian in memory of the martyrs killed in hatred of the faith during the persecutions of the third century [watch movies WHO and WHO] Someone may have noticed that the clergy have a homosexual problem now escaped out of control? I forgive me if I repeat myself returning to state, a few days later, this situation I had predicted in detail ten years ago in a number of published texts and always paid a high price [cf. WHO]. Especially precise feel no satisfaction in reiterating this, place when I pointed out certain problems and did some analysis, I wished that time would give me wrong, certainly not reason. . A decade ago, before the very serious problem today, albeit not yet exploded with today's scope, only two priests treated the problem in Europe: one in Poland and one in Italy. The Polish priest is Darius Oko, the Italian Ariel S. Levi Gualdo. Several important was then the scientific work of Polish director Andrzej Kobyliński priest who has made a very valuable contribution to the analysis of the problem [cf. see one of his scientific papers WHO]. . The Father and I Darius Oko we have traded in the past many opinions on the subject, agree among ourselves on a specific point: the problem of this "gay lobby influences the Church" [cf. His interview 2013 WHO] and inside it has made a "coup homosexual» [cf. My interview 2013 WHO], It would become an irreversible problem when this Universal nubifrocio He had touched its peak sweeping the College of Bishops. . Unnecessarily years it laid stress: the bishops that villain so promote and protect gay priests, They are a dangerous scourge, but when gay priests become bishops, we will be faced with a catastrophic disaster before which two forces will help us to raise ourselves from such desolation, albeit with the use of a long time and much effort: the Holy Spirit and the Holy People of God [cf. WHO]. . My numerous writings pubbicati on The island of Patmos testify that many times, talking of the Petrine ministry and the reigning Pontiff explained, and I have repeatedly stated: . "That poor imprudent man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that of all the previous decades of damage done is only the first victim, or as I wrote in the recent past using an allegorical [cf. WHO]: he is only the last of the customers come in the restaurant and that crossing the threshold was attacked by waiters who demanded from him payment of the accounts of all those before him had had lunch and dinner without pay, but leaving fine suspended accounts [cf. WHO]». . This My concept, It was allegedly taken by my dear friend Andrea Tornielli in his last press articles about the agency Vatican Insider, which rightly draws between its rows the fact that certain problems do not arise under this pontificate [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO]. So far, all of us with rational minds tending more to the logical that all'umorale, We fully agree. What is known, however, in the articles of my dear friend, I have often successfully defended when it came under sniper fire for merely exercising their right to report [cf. WHO], or when someone has released the first statement and then if you rimangiate [cf. WHO], is that he does not seem to pose the question of whether the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, in their government, he made mistakes, or whether it is burdened with defects and limitatezze that characterize all our imperfect humanity marked by corruption of original sin. Of human imperfections, defects and limitatezze was burdened even the Pope Gregory I, universally known as St. Gregory the Great, that perhaps the doctrinal quality, pastoral and government had one or two more of the Pope Francis I, but it is clear: only one or two, anything that! . It is so true - and I for one as I have said and repeated many times - that the Pope Francis I can not pay the high bill of a doctrinal crisis that has finally generated a great moral crisis in the clergy [cf. My article on Theologically, WHO], because this crisis begins to take shape in the sixties and spreads dramatically since the early seventies of the twentieth century. In those years the reigning Supreme Pontiff had not yet been consecrated priest, because his ordination took place in Argentina at the end of 1969, to be exact 13 December. . The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio It has its serious responsibilities, then if these objective responsibility does not want to see, then you run the serious risk of falling into one of the worst quirks of our politicians, that after carrying out the campaign promises made by skimming the scripts of science fiction movies, once elected and catapulted into real problems and especially difficult in the country solution, They begin to defend themselves by saying that it's all because of previous governments. Therefore, if on one hand I think the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio are due responsibilities of several poor choices made by its Supreme Predecessors, Blessed Saints and Popes included, he, on the other hand, which however has not yet been either beatified or canonized, lying in front of certain serious problems not easily solved put us in a lot of his, for example in imprudent spirit, throwing arm with speeches on slippery topics, making poor choices and resorting to ambiguous expressions in which it is difficult to grasp the spirit of the involuntary good faith, especially when these ambiguities are then generated in the visible Church quarrels and divisions as they had never before seen. And although repeatedly begged by cardinals, Bishops, priests and lay faithful to offer words of clarification [cf. WHO], He has refused to respond with a spirit that denotes touchiness and haughtiness. But it, soon after, sported media humility by washing and kissing your feet Mass of the Lord's Supper the Muslim's prostitute, to the delight of journalists ultra secularists and the loss of us astonished priests in that holy day we celebrate the institution of the Holy Eucharist and the ministerial priesthood, We not celebrate the World Day of the fugitive or the redemption of prostitutes [cf. WHO]. . It is true that the captain of a ship He must rely on sailors who have at their disposal, but it is also true that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio seems that most of the wrong men, often went hunting almost. And the thing that hurts is that the reigning Pontiff, paying no heed to many prelates of great experience in service to the Holy See even decades, He has persistently repeatedly to approve episcopal appointments of persons who had been repeatedly excluded from the so-called backhoe burdened because of large doctrinal and moral issues, led into this by people who enjoy his confidence and so he followed to say the least dangerous to keep around. In other words, or better understood, it comes to that issue that I have called Court of Miracles [cf. WHO, WHO] and that the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller has called instead magic circle: . "I have the impression that the Pope's magic circle there are those who bother to spy on suspected opponents, thereby preventing an open discussion and balanced. Sort all Catholics in the categories of "friend" or "enemy" of the Pope, It is the most serious damage they cause to the Church " [cf. WHO]. . That's why in 2015 I began with two articles in which I stated sadly ironic title since what was the heart of the dramatic problem: "Bishops, trends and tips for new careerists: be poor, peripheral existential and sloppy " [cf. WHO], "They're buggerando the Holy Father: We protect Peter! The worst ocelots are coming in pauperism episcopate glory " [cf. WHO]. . Like it or not, but if the facts are incontrovertible unfortunately not only the fatuous vague and debatable opinions, in those three years of my articles there is the picture of what might be called the episcopate bergogliano. Then I will provide some examples to explain without going into details, but the premise that if the Ecclesiastical Authority summon me to give you their names and surnames of the persons in question, although unnecessarily, because they know very well both individuals and above all their deeds. And the examples are these: in Italy I have become bishops, two priests in their fifties who were a happy fact coppietta, that note and recognized since the time of the seminar, and today, on their mouths, unfortunately used for anything but to pray, It is all and only a constant hive of poor, poverty, refugees, existential suburbs and so on. He became bishop a person to whom the youngsters who at the time if the were with him when he was a young priest, Today delight in telling about his tastes from passive gay submissive to dominant male. He became bishop, afterward he awarded the dignity of cardinal, a subject that has covered and protected for years the most filthy crap priests who frequented marchettari a fee and they imboscavano in gay saunas. He became bishop a priest from which an entire presbytery remember exactly which and how many other seminarians, then with what and how many young priests below if he made her, so that his diocesan ordinary, to prevent this follow suit fox in the henhouse to wreak damage, gravely mistaken removed it from the diocese and from contact with young priests, sending him to Rome to study. Not to mention the young priests, removed in the same way by the dioceses under the guise of specialized studies, that once finished their courses in the Roman ecclesiastical universities, through the good offices of senior prelates gay or gay friendly then they entered as officials in the various departments of the Holy See. And just to clarify: during the month of September I will go up for the second time the steps of the State Secretariat for going to confer with the proper authorities but also to hand over a dossier of evidence and documents I drafted and signed before which the stories about Sodom and Gomorrah are a childish tale by the boarders, all so that staved off the dazzling career of another person at very high risk. . All of this nubifrocio which it is much worse than those tsunami that ravaged entire nations, Is it the fault of the previous government members? The Pope Francis I, in certain dangerous appointments we have not been deceived, anything: when it was put on notice of the nature and deeds of certain persons previously rejected as candidates for the episcopate, It's handsomely tricked and promoted them bishops, some even Cardinal. . The Pope Francis I It is not a man you love being challenged, nor he loves to hear from serious and honest collaborators that certain pastoral choices and Government could be very wrong, or that certain appointments should be avoided, therefore, acting in accordance with the typical patterns of the mediocre, He has surrounded himself with dangerous dwarves, then they have the best of the worst of the career-change, what they are now all poor, poverty and refugees. But if tomorrow the wind to change and a new giungesse Papa Re, overnight we would see them enter their cathedrals with seven meters magna hood, the episcopal gloves on the hands and mitres damask decorated with precious gems on the head. . And here you could call me to order, because in the previous lines I dared to give the poor the August Pontiff Ruling. Having said that I clarify to anyone who considers the Supreme Pontiff Reigning the third person in human history free from any stain of sin after the Word of God made man and after the Great Mother of God Blessed Virgin Mary, that define man Jorge Mario Bergoglio balanced, with solid doctrine and the ability to govern, would like to magnify the gorgeous gowns that certain king narrated by celebrated fairy tale, but the truth is naked. It rasserenino therefore all papolatri, because at the beginning of the twentieth century we had a Pope who was a mediocre man, and in some respects even limited, It was called Pius X, Today loved and revered Holy Pontiff of the Church. It was not the only, the Holy Pontiff Pius X, to be a mediocre and limited man, I have been many other saints now highly revered by the people of God, from the Patron Saint of Priests, St. John Mary Vianney. What it was therefore the heroic nature of the virtues that made a man mediocre and too limited as the Supreme Pontiff Pius X a great successor of Peter and then a Saint? St. Pius X had a virtue that the man's personality Jorge Mario Bergoglio seems currently unknown: Pope Pius X had the extraordinary gift of grace of that humility that made him great, but above all able to surround himself with men of the highest talent and intellect, from the Servant of God Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val, that was the big hand of the memorable Encyclical Sheep feeding Domici. And a Saint, as in the case of the Saint Pius X, He surrounds himself with holy men of God, as opposed to subjects like the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio who tend instead to surround themselves - if I pass the end very little Roman church - de pore half-saws. . From a pastoral point of view and ecclesiological, before the current irreversible nubifrocio which now also he flooded the College of Bishops, I can not rejoice before the Letter to the Holy People of God of Pope Francis I [cf. WHO], before which there is little to rejoice, because it is the so-called bergogliano yet another text in which it tries to say everything in order not to say anything about what you should say instead, so especially clear and precise. A really poor text, when compared to a memorable text, but unfortunately it forgot from short memory minds, like the one written just eight years ago by Venerable Pope Benedict XVI and titrated: "Pastoral Letter to the Catholics of Ireland" [cf. WHO]. . The letter of Pope Benedict XVI It has a pastoral structure, theological and socio-ecclesial that starts first of all a great sense of humanity. In it indicates the problem, By analyzing and envisage all solutions. The letter of Pope Francis seems to flaunt humanity contrived in an attempt to show human sensitivity to the world, but most importantly it is devoid of a pastoral structure, theological and socio-ecclesial. . That said: If the theologians on the one hand, Journalists on the other hand, both want to do the analysis in their various and respective competent, unfortunately we have to achieve this result: the Letter of Benedict XVI to the Catholics of Ireland says it all dramatically, pastoral and ecclesial; a letter of Francis to the Holy People of God does not say anything because it does not analyze the problem, It does not indicate with precision parties responsible and does not offer solutions, to the point of blaming an unspecified "clericalism", when in fact the Holiness of Our Lord the reigning Pontiff should know well that the dramatic problem is the high rate spread homosexuality in the clergy. . This is the difference that exists between a man mediocre and limited as the Supreme Pontiff Pius X, and a man mediocre and limited as the Supreme Pontiff Francis I. The whole premise that the Holy Spirit offers and filled as always with quite special the Successor of Peter, but if the Successor of Peter is not open to accommodate and exploit the abundant gifts and special grace poured on him, In this case, the Holy Spirit does not work. It does not work because God can not contradict or may contradict the mystery of creation: Man was created in the image and likeness of God, free and endowed with free. If anyone, before a Pope that can be partially or totally closed also from time to time or to the Holy Spirit grace Actions, he came out saying that out anyway, he being the Successor of Peter, in any case you can never err in matters of doctrine and faith, in which case it would come out by the founding principles and fundamentals Catholic faith; even to fall into fideism, but the real magic. Such as do long all those who now have specialized to look for in the pontifical documents that they do not contain, or to make him say what they do not tell, convinced through their interpretations Pindaric to defend and protect the papacy whose first defender to be the Successor of Peter, because if the papacy did not defend him, all our defense is likely to be useless and totally vain, and ridiculous. . In the Letter to the People of God, His Holiness Francis I he looks very well to indicate the great plague of homosexuality and dell'omosessualismo now spread even to the highest levels of the church hierarchy; anything, He is so determined to keep around as a consultant on a subject as dangerous gay friendly James Martin S.J. [cf. WHO]. . The Supreme Pontiff Francis I it looks good by clarifying that cases of widespread pedophilia among the clergy, each of which is intended to create devastating media effects, as well as damage to the victim atrocious, are real cases and found, but rare, because most of those listed as cases of pedophilia, in truth they are only cases of ephebophilia, ie routine practice of homosexuality by priests exercising that pure, simple, beautiful and protected exercise homosexual sexuality recognized as a genuine right from the Law itself. . To understand how the cases of pedophilia in the clergy are rare, just do a simple numerical proportion analysis: in the world the secular Catholic clergy and adjust consists of about 450.000 priests [cf. WHO], if we compare this number with that of pedophile priests convicted by a final judgment, We find out what we're talking about really numerical proportion of very few priests, roughly in the order of 0,02% low. Since, however, the efebofilo falls into those that are the defects related to the practice of homosexuality, if it's priests screams instead "to pedophile!”, even when a commonly gay priest and certainly not pedophile, He has profaned the Sacred Order of Priests consuming a carnal sacrilege with a boy of seventeen years and eleven months, who he was rather addicted to sexual activity since he was thirteen, and that was a prostitute paid since he was fourteen. . Most of the priests referred to as pedophiles - I repeat, however, are not pedophiles but efebofili or simply giosamente and gay -, who they have had sex with teenagers in the absence of physical violence and psychological coercion, consumed alone and nothing but gay relationships. And that being said I repeat: if in the absence of proven psychological and physical violence, a sixteen year old with his family presentassero is assisted by an army of lawyers before the judges, for an order of priest pedophilia, they would literally be thrown out of any court in the world, if anything, even with the serious risk of being sued by their gay priest who has only had sex with a minor in post-pubertal age group, without subjecting it to any physical and psychological coercion, and what obviously consenting. And all this - I repeat it again without being wordy - it's called homosexuality and pedophilia does not. . This lack of clarity and distinction including very rare cases of pedophilia, cases of ephebophilia, cases of sexual relationships with young consenting gay priests and often handsomely rewarded for their services rendered quite often for a fee, therefore likely to create a big and dangerous misconception: if a gay adult has sexual intercourse with a consenting ultra sixteen teenager or with a fourteen already sailed and as such psychologically recognized, in this case and has had just nothing but a lawful sexual intercourse; if, however, to have had a sexual relationship with this same subject is a priest, in that case you scream "pedophile". The first very great hypocrites who cry out immediately "pedophile" are just the children of the powerful lobby LBGT, those teaching on sexuality understood as a genre of your choice or on the beauty of 'Gay love, I have already imposed in many countries around the world starting from elementary schools. . The reigning Supreme Pontiff, He was accidentally informed by his gay Jesuit James Martin consultant around the world, Many Catholic schools have had to close and then liquidate their unused now stable, because local governments had imposed their teachings incompatible with the faith and Catholic morality, such as the dell'omosessualismo exaltation and the theory of the genus, the obligation of education on contraception and abortion rights? Whether these cases are not documented by the branch radio Radicale which for some time it has reduced the newspaper of the Italian Bishops L'Avvenire, It does not mean they are not real cases and especially rising steadily, those in Catholic schools forced to close its doors and sell stable. . And this large and dangerous misconception that originates primarily from the lack of information and distinction between pedophilia, ephebophilia and homosexuality, with all its numerical statistics, the manager is the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that is not the Holy Pope Gregory I the Great or the Holy Pontiff Pius X, who also had, like men, limitatezze of which they have not affected the achievement of their holiness, simply because they went beyond themselves to open up to the actions of the grace of God upon them. . Finally, I must give a reason to Professor Roberto de Mattei, I have often criticized amiably, without ever having questioned his preparation and especially his exemplary life and his being a genuine intellectual model, a husband and a Catholic father. My Christian and intellectual honesty requires me to say that Professor Roberto de Mattei has unfortunately right when he speaks of papolatri, because at this certain we have now reached: the Father and the Son may be wrong to proceed to the Holy Spirit, but the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio no, he can do no wrong and is never wrong, whatever you say or do. . . Given these premises, the Major Basilica of St. John Lateran, Cathedral of Rome and Mother of all the Churches of the world, we can also put up the sign: total failure sellout, aware that in the future, from this terrible devastation wrought by his bishops and his priests, with long and painful effort visible the pilgrim Church on earth will recover and be relieved only by the Holy Spirit and the Holy People of God. . The 18 February 2013, a few days after the announcement of the act of renunciation given by the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, the news agency Vatican Insider He reported a deservedly forgotten text of the young theologian Joseph Ratzinger, from 1969 and contained in its cycle of radio lessons: . "From today's crisis it will emerge a Church that has lost much. It will become smaller and will have to share more or less the beginning. No longer able to live many of the buildings he had built in prosperity. As the number of its faithful will decrease, gra also lose part of the social privileges […] But despite all these changes can be presumed, the Church will find again and with all the energy that is essential to it, what has always been its center: faith in the Triune God, in Jesus Christ, the Son of God made man, assistance of the Spirit, that will last until the end. Will start again in small groups, by movements and by a minority that transmit the faith and prayer at the center of the experience, and experience again the sacraments as a divine service and not as a liturgical structure problem. It will be a more spiritual Church, that does not arrogherà political office now flirting with the left and now with the right. It will do this with effort. The process in fact crystallization and clarification will make poor, The Church will become a small, the process will be long and tiring. But after testing of these divisions will come from an internalized Church and simplified a great force. Men who live in a totally planned world will experience an unspeakable loneliness. If they have completely lost the sense of God, hear all the horror of their poverty. They then discover the small community of believers as something totally new: they find out as a hope for themselves, the answer had always tried in secret […] To me it seems certain that they are preparing for the very difficult times Church. His real crisis has just begun. It has to deal with major upheavals. But I am also quite sure of what will be the end: not the Church of the political cult […] but the Church of faith. Of course it will not be the dominant social force insofar as it was until recently. But the Church will know a new flowering and will appear as the man's house, where to find life and hope beyond death " [cf. WHO]. . These words painted the devastation wrought in our recent past, the situation of this disfiguring visible Church, and finally the future that awaits us, just do not be blind and not think that this moment of glory for some, for other aberrant confusion, together with this pontificate will never go, among cries of "epochal revolutions" and "irreversible processes". Screams of those typical Jacobean, not having a future perspective and eschatological, are capable of living only the everything at once this, looking like boarding pirates to grab at this present everything you can grab, almost as if … "There is no certainty in tomorrow ', then "who wants be happy", in the words of the father of Gnosticism Renaissance neo-pagan Lorenzo the Magnificent, it was in fact a father of neo-pagan Gnosticism, He was not a father of the Catholic faith. . the Island of Patmos, 24 August 2018 . . . «You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32], but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island with your offers through the secure Paypal system: or you can use the bank account: They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930 in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank It does not provide your email and we could not send you a thanksgiving [ firstname.lastname@example.org ] . . . . .