The case Viganò and “Who am I to answer?”. pedophilia, ephebophilia but especially too widespread homosexuality in the clergy. The Church piaciona has finally fallen under the deadly blows of piacioneria

- Church news -

The VIGANÒ CASE AND 'WHO AM I TO RESPOND?». PAEDOPHILIA, EFEBOFILIA, BUT ABOVE ALL TOO MUCH HOMOSEXUALITY IN WIDESPREAD CLERGY. CHURCH PIACIONA is FINALLY FALL UNDER THE SHOTS OF DEADLY PIACIONERIA.

.

On the return trip from Ireland, a reporter turned to the Supreme Pontiff a question about so-called Viganò Caso, no but no one, what I read so far, We have analyzed the date dall'Augusto response interviewed. Indeed, The Holy Father, before the issues raised by an elderly bishop made his debut in the facts with a "Who am I to answer"? Yet the question to answer is very simple: S. AND. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, He tells the truth or he lies?

.

.

PDF format Print article

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

disinterestedness and gratuity …

In previous articles to which reference [cf. WHO, WHO], I think I have distinguished with sufficient scientific rigor the difference between pedophilia, ephebophilia and widespread cases of homosexuality in the clergy. Or in the words of a man of God, Cardinal Carlo Caffara, with whom I had several times to talk about the problem now out of control priests and gay clergy at the highest levels of our church hierarchy: "We are dealing with a problem of epidemic proportions now!», answered with pained distress the cardinal.

.

In one of these my latest articles I turn to some experts journalists chores Vatican precise question that I know will remain unanswered, that is, if they believe that the reigning Pope is by faith, doctrine, science and pastoral gifts in excess of Gregory I the Great. So I ask, for surely ironic but appropriate tone, if they are really convinced that the Father and the Son may be wrong to proceed to the Holy Spirit, but the reigning Pontiff can not however no wrong, anything you say or do. I find it disturbing that they do not even pose the question that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, as we all are born with the stain of original sin, is an imperfect because too corrupt as all humans from this spot, that here was certainly not committed, but which we have been transmitted by our progenitors responsible for the Poisoned nature [Catechism of the Catholic Church, NN. 385-412].

.

To these staunch defenders, for which perhaps the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, after the Word of God and the Blessed Virgin Mary she is considered the third born without the stain of original sin in the history of all humanity, counterpoise subjects but otherwise similarly dangerous: the haters of the reigning Pontiff, ready to attack him and irriderlo so insolent to whatever he says or does, including quite a few right things he said and done by him in the course of his pontificate, but above all forgetting that he, however imperfect, limited and defeasible is the legitimate successor of Peter. Therefore, we can not appreciate it as a person, or as so-called private doctor, but we must respect and obey him especially when he expresses himself in matters of doctrine and faith [cf. Mt 16, 13-20].

.

We consecrated with the Sacred Order of Priests - and it is good that I remember certain kinds of secular journalists -, the bishop who ordered reciting it over us the prayer of consecration, imposing on their hands and ungendoci with sacred chrism, we promised respect and devout obedience, understood: to him and to the Bishop of Rome, because it is in communion with the Bishop of the Diocese and with the Bishop of Rome Father of the universal Church that we celebrate and we can lawfully and validly celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice. We however never promised that the consecrating Bishop, then the Bishop of Rome, There would have been nice and that we would have estimated. We promised that we would have respected and obeyed. In fact we are consecrated priests with Holy Orders, Vatican experts are not certain who appear to have rather solemnly promise sympathy and unconditional esteem Jorge Mario Bergoglio, of course, all free the amor Dei, as we will explain later ...

.

One thing that unites these two extremes, that as of the railway tracks are far from each other, that do not touch but which, however, allow the transit of the same identical train, is that their act, whether favorable or contrary to the bitter end to the bitter end to this pontificate, It is not free, because behind each other and there is money and lenders; there are free offers the combined Readers offerings for Masses for the repose of the deceased that the undersigned has always been at the full disposal of the costs of The island of Patmos, with much public register in which is recorded to a hundredth until the last offer received [to better understood, see WHO]. I then came to a conclusion: both love blindly and uncritically, hate is equally blind and uncritical, certe people to Rende; and makes it clear that both in money and in various kinds of benefits.

.

S. AND. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, He has decided to make public the facts and circumstances known to be always within the Church; and these facts that have in themselves the luciferino are also known to all Vaticanists by increasingly introduced into the so-called sacred palaces, in which it is to determine what the time really sacred survives [cf. Memorial S.It is. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, WHO].

.

On the return trip Ireland, a reporter turned to the Supreme Pontiff a question about so-called Viganò Caso, no but no one, what I read so far, We have analyzed the date dall'Augusto response interviewed. Indeed, Pope ready to run in Lampedusa, ready to devote logorrheic and detailed answers on the newest ship of migrants stopped in the port of Catania, ready as I have often reminded to wash and kiss the feet of the Muslims and prostitutes Mass of the Lord's Supper, in the day that we celebrate the institution of the Holy Eucharist and the ministerial priesthood, not the day of the refugee and the prostitute, before the issues raised by an elderly bishop made his debut in the facts with a ... "Who am I to answer"? [cf. minute 20,47 Video below]. While the newspaper of the Italian bishops dismissed this memorial as "a dossier poisoned ' [cf. WHO].

.

.

The secular press, the same one that for decades has publicly lynched Blessed Pope Paul VI, the Holy Father John Paul II and the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, was launched immediately to the defense of the reigning Pontiff downloading poison drops sull'Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò, But without going into the substance of what he says in his memoir. Because the question is very simple: His Excellency, He tells the truth or he lies? And what I remember said that this kind of printing is made by the same journalists that when the time attacked the Supreme Pontiff Paul VI and then the Supreme Pontiff John Paul, stalwart young men were of the thick foliage, today are bald and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, but they remained the same in the soul whores ever. But mostly they are people to whom, today as forty years ago, if someone asked them to recite the first five words of the opening I believe, would dumb show, But magnify the ultra secularist this "revolutionary papacy Press" that gave birth to "turning points" from which "never come back" because "absolutely irreversible". Here, the absoluteness of faith on which they wrote poison rivers to denigrate Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger when the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith promulgated the Declaration Dominus Jesus [cf. WHO], they finally applied to the so-called bergoglismo. It's this one, like it or not, It is called idolatry, or if you prefer idolaicolatria.

.

Therefore, we have learned from these journalists that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò He would have had a succession case with his brother and sister, He would be moved away from the role that covered as Secretary General of the Governorate of Vatican City, it would then be a careerist disappointed, who aspired to become governor and then Cardinal ... well: the "poor" and "vicious" Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, He would finally avenged the tender age of seventy-seven years to those who he thought were the wrongs suffered [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc. …].

.

I point out to the members of this congregation and journalistic blogghettara, including several vaticanologi defending a sword, obviously free the amor Dei the reigning Pontiff, whatever he says or does, that the worst scandals of pedophilia, those that led up to the bankruptcy several American dioceses in the nineties of the twentieth century, have occurred precisely because of this reasoning mechanisms with which today, certain whores vaticanologhe try to defend both defensible and above all the indefensible. Both therefore clear to all of them and also no easy worth denial, that American dioceses have suffered what I have suffered and paid what they paid, because before the complaints reacted exactly this way:

.

"It is all about the former seminarians dismissed from the seminary who want to take revenge … The worst scandals …».

.

The worst scandals They broke out in virulent way with immense harm to the Church, because who would have to act and act decisively and immediately declared unreliable witnesses, but also those who denounced certain serious crimes. Exactly how recently did Cardinal Oscar Maradiaga, that living in the shadow of the living sun, from it being irradiated it is therefore sun vivo himself, for that too free of any kind of criticism and also born without the stain of original sin, up to the point of being able to assert before dozens of seminarians who have denounced rounds of homosexuality within its seminar arcivescovile, with the involvement in them of trainers, that it is just "murmurings" of "seminarians talkers" [cf. WHO]. All this just a short distance from the discharge of his auxiliary bishop, a gay blown to where ever that virgin Archbishop Oscar Maradiaga illibata had noticed, always for the fact that he too, born without stain of original sin, He can not have even the slightest ability to perceive and seize sinful situations.

.

Today, diverse whores vaticanologhe, eluding the speech and informing us of the causes of succession Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò with family, or trying to present him as a careerist who has not been given the sop, reproduce the same identical patterns through which we then had the worst scandals; not least the fact that the powerful could not and should not be touched, if then they were touched, everything was likely to be resolved with a snappy ... "Who am I to answer?».

.

Of course, This kind of reactions to “who am I to respond?”, all of them are theological and Read the perspective of higher Mystagogy dogmatic, for in them it is contained and enclosed a great mystery: the mystery of humility. Exactly what perhaps makes the reigning Pontiff and others very close to him more humble ancòra of Christ himself that "although of divine nature, He did not consider it robbery to be equal with God; but he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in human likeness " [cf. In II 1, 6-7].

.

The truth is that the Church, over the past five years, tried to please and please the world in every way. And he has first put an army of people wrong in the most delicate and therefore wrong places. May, as during this pontificate Augusto, it happened that the clergy were dismissed, resigned or expelled without any canonical process, without knowing the charges of informers and without the opportunity to defend himself; all while at the same time, the promoters of the New Church all mercy, tenderness and love for all that is not Catholic, They mocked the right, the law and those who "idolize the canonical norms". And here remember the canonical rules were written to guarantee justice and the maintenance of order within the Church, to avoid any form of free will and abuse of ecclesiastical authority. And it comes to basics, these, which they are used primarily to defend the poor, the weak and the faithful workers of the vineyard of the Lord by the atrocities of bullies, including those ecclesiastical bullies who deride the canonical norms and then impose dictatorships of their own free will; all subjects of which, the reigning Pontiff, He never mentioned, but just never! [cf. WHO]. And all the while pace of whores vaticanologhe you do not realize it, and if they are made before these irrefutable evidence of the facts, then silent and flee, because for them the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is more perfect in his humanity of the Word of God made man. And with that the question is just a must: but to all of them, in various kinds of benefits, him what is, if they are willing to deny these levels until the blatant reality?

.

A Church that wants to please at any cost and at any cost, which highlights unsavory figures like the Jesuit James Martin, unpunished and shameless proponent of such a theory and dell'omosessualismo, in a proliferation of the priests and especially bishops who flirt with powerful lobby gay or so-called LGBT, how can you dare to mention the grave, dangerous and now devastating problem of homosexuality in the clergy, coupling from time to the maximum ecclesiastical positions vertices? The reigning pontiff raised the problem "we are full of homosexuals', talking behind closed doors to the Bishops of Italy gathered in plenary session [cf. WHO], but the problem is far, not only from resolved, because it has not even begun to treat it. This with the result that lobby gay They have now imposed and placed their own men in the Episcopal College and with that experienced the facts even in the College of Cardinals, with all the gay proliferation is something achieved in this our poor Church increasingly visible omosessualizzata and affected by discharges of authentic nubifrocio Universal.

.

S. AND. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, It raised this question, he did so as a senior bishop and as a former apostolic nuncio in the United States of America. None of us affect his family inheritance issues or its succession causes, We are not interested in the process to his intentions about the fact that he would have felt betrayed in his career expectations. This poison pills to feed the public, by certain whores vaticanologhe is the worst damage that can be done to the Church, because in this way have been for years covered the pedophile priests and with them the bishops who covered them, while all the accusers were accused of being prejudiced only the resentful who sought only revenge.

.

The moral problem is not represented in the Church pedophilia, I repeat that touched, albeit with devastating effects, a very very small number of priests around the world; the problem of the Church is the widespread homosexuality in the clergy. There are already dioceses in which, find a heterosexual priest, is an enterprise that borders on the impossible; and those few heterosexual priests who will survive, are ostracized and massacred both by their gay brothers that of the now numerous bishops gay friendly.

.

The modern Church welcoming and inclusive, all mercy and tenderness, nonjudgmental and enhances the supreme tribunal of the subjective consciousness, no longer dare to say what is moral or immoral, what is lawful and what is sin. The only one immorality seems in fact to be established by the rejection of illegal immigrants who have paid 5.000 Dollars a trip on a boat, When an airline ticket low cost to reach Italy would cost him 300 the 400 Euro. And this kind of worldly Church and mondanizzante certainly can not express negative views on homosexual culture and practice of homosexuality. So, the only remains abominable sin pedophilia, to the point of yelling "pedophile!"As a priest, simply and homosexual giosamente, He has had a sexual relationship with a minor seventeen consenting and eleven months.

.

But the Italian Church, how certain whores vaticanologhe, Is it really inclined to defend free the amor Dei certe cause, including those of real or alleged refugees? Because I am reminded of a doubt that launch at the end between the lines, not being part of the subject matter: it seems that the money allocated by the government to various charities and charitable institutions for the care of the real or alleged refugees, both in the last year it amounted to a higher amount to the same revenue of the Eight per thousand to the Catholic Church, ie more than one billion euros. And all this raises a doubt in me: in various parts of Italy, and in a very special way from Naples down, It has been a proliferation of Onlus founded by priests who have perceived and they perceive that purpose disbursements of funds for the assistance of refugees. Characteristic of these Onlus especially common in Southern Italy, which as we know there are three different Mafias, to which there is also the ecclesiastical mafia certain priests, It is to never submit budgets. If we then go to the Chambers of Commerce to see the statutes and check who they are formed, find that these Onlus They are made by the brother of the priest together with the priest's sister and the grandchildren of the priest ... who obviously share out the cake free the amor Dei!

.

When this great love for refugees, I repeat that it is entirely free the amor Dei, jump out: nothing but scandal of pedophile priests! After all this is the real scourge of the evil clericalism indicated and badly explained by the Pope in his Letter to the Holy People of God [cf. WHO], namely the clerical assumption that we are smart, while all others are poor ignorant of that unfortunately, just as it was once the popular wisdom of the Holy People of God: "Without money there is no singing Mass!».

.

And the Mother of God Blessed Virgin Mary Mother of the Church, intercede for us, admitted that manages ancòra long to hold the arm of her Divine Son, that does not unleash his wrath upon us, avendoci also clearly explained and informed that: "Tire and Sidon at the judgment will have a fate than for you" [Mt 11, 22]. And yet: "Truly I tell you that the land of Sodom and Gomorrah, on the day of judgment, It will be treated than for that city " [Mt 10, 15].

.

It will then be those who are most merciful and tender of Jesus Christ, dispute his judgment and his punishment accusing him of not being merciful.

.

the Island of Patmos, 27 August 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanksgiving [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

About isoladipatmos

3 thoughts on "The case Viganò and “Who am I to answer?”. pedophilia, ephebophilia but especially too widespread homosexuality in the clergy. The Church piaciona has finally fallen under the deadly blows of piacioneria

  1. great…really good article that sheds light!
    a note to be corrected…Article, about half, It cites a passage of Scripture, We would say the hymn to the divinity of Jesus. She writes Phil II 1,6-7.
    And’ Obviously a typo because there is a second letter to the Philippians, and the right quotation is Phil 2,6 and following.
    I hope to have pleased

  2. Sorry to see that they are using the same tactic ever: the pretend nothing and pull straight toward their own way. It occurs to me that they are so addicted to sin no more audition no shame or, more prosaically, They work for the final dissolution. For them, this, there will certainly while the Church, it's safe, flourish beautifully right on the manure spread with such alacrity by them…

Leave a Reply