The Holy Father Francis rectified with a sewn patch on an old dress
THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ADJUSTED WITH A PIECE ON A DRESS SEWN OLD
.
"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22]
.
.
Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
.
.
.
the Supreme Pontiff Francesco with the director of the Vatican Press Office Federico Lombardi, S.J.
I was asked a question about the Pope's conversation at the Rome Diocese Convention. After the Third question, dad, in the answer given "off the cuff" on the "culture of the provisional", he said orally: «for this reason a great majority of our sacramental marriages are null " (so it appears from the recording), while the text published by the Press Office today reports: «some of our sacramental marriages are void ". Why this change? It is a manipulation of the Pope's thought? The answer is that, when the Pope speaks spontaneously "off the cuff", the transcribed text is always subject to revision by those responsible for the care of the Pope's texts, to review the language or any inaccuracies or particular points that it is right to specify. When topics of some importance are touched upon, the revised text is always submitted to the Pope himself. This is what happened in this case, therefore the published text was expressly approved by the Pope [text is available WHO].
.
.
.
I read with interest the press release in which fulfilling his role as official spokesman and director of the Holy See Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi S.J. specifies that the Holiness of Our Lord the Supreme Pontiff Francis, "Speaking off the cuff he said orally" a sentence then retouched in the written text. To justify the retouching of a sentence destined to create confusion around the world [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc..], he specifies at the end of the statement that "the published text" - that is, the corrected one - "was expressly approved by the Pope".
.
I would like to understand better: this perhaps means that I, in an off-the-cuff meditation while preaching the spiritual exercises to the clergy, may express an inaccuracy on the procession of the Divine Persons, then retouching the text later in the editorial office, when that meditation is to be published in a book, all with my prior posthumous approval?
.
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the right) with his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the left)
Well I wonder: maybe it happened that In this A.D 2016, the Jesuits, they suddenly changed into the holy virgins and martyrs Agata, Lucia, Agnese, Cecilia, Anastasia … or maybe they assume none, including presbyters and theologians, know the Gospel more, more and more replaced with emotional substitutes of a national-popular matrix? And I say this because on the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God made man is expressed in these terms:
.
"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22].
.
The posthumous piece sewn makes the tear worse, because the August Pontiff continued undaunted to express himself off the cuff only one embarrassing limitations, which are not just lack of language properties, his lack of doctrinal knowledge is often at stake, historical-ecclesial and pastoral, and the whole could also be read as a lack of prudence.
.
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the left) and his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the right)
A Roman Pontiff he does not speak in clichés and does not give public vent to his own emotions. This is due to the simple fact that he is no longer Simon, but Peter, the rock on which Christ built his Church [cf. Mt 13, 16-20]. Peter is the one who "when he has repented" is called to a precise mission entrusted to him by Christ God: "Strengthen your brethren".
.
«Simone, Simone, behold Satan has demanded to sift you like wheat; but I prayed for you, that thy faith fail not:; and you, turned again, confirm your brothers ". And Peter said to him: "Man, with you I am ready to go to prison and to death ". She answered him: «Pietro, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know " [cf. LC 22, 31-34].
.
As the invitation to confirm the brothers is preceded by the warning "once you have repented", but above all followed by the prophetic anticipation «Peter, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know ", I honestly ask myself: Jorge Mario Bergoglio, has truly ceased to be Simon, and once he "repented" and became Peter, he initiated his own Christological mission, which is to confirm the brothers in the faith, certainly not lead them to that confusion resulting from ambiguous and inaccurate expressions? Because it is on the level of exegesis, both on the theological level, to this sentence we must pay close attention, given that at the beginning of it we speak of "repentance" and at the end of "betrayal", at the center of the speech is exhorted "confirm the brothers", but this central phrase remains precisely in the middle, between "repentance" and "betrayal". Or perhaps someone intends to manipulate it to make the Word of God say what it did not actually say, extrapolating only "confirm the brothers"?
.
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the right) and his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the left)
The Holy See, as well as the Fire Brigade, of which Federico Lombardi S.J. he has now become commander, it has dicasteries, pontifical councils and secretariats; in philosophy, theology, canonists, historians, ecclesiologists and specialists in various sectors. And all these servants of Peter and of the Apostolic See have always worked on the texts and texts of the Supreme Pontiffs, or at least of all those Supreme Predecessors of the Reigning Pontiff who had the humility to get help, what this made them, as well as loved and venerated, also saints and models of heroic virtue for the entire universal Church. Or maybe someone remembers a sensational one gaffe of St. John XXIII, of Blessed Paul VI, of the Servant of God John Paul I or of Saint John Paul II? Someone wanted to point out how gaffe the famous speech of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI in Regensburg, but today, years later, that speech turned out to be a lucid prophecy [cf. WHO].
.
If the Holy Father, whose authority is beyond any Catholic discussion, think about continuing this way, in addition to the gradual emptying of the churches, he runs the risk of being whistled in public by Catholics, which will then be criticized and criticized by the ultra-secularists, by the communists Radical-chic and by the Freemasons who for some years have been praising the wonders of this pontificate, with the flirtatious Catholic-Lutheran feminist theologian Marinella Perroni and with Alberto Melloni, undisputed leader of Bologna School, guests of honor at the Grand Orient of Italy [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO pag. 6], and the whole, will’ I know da, a supreme insult of the Catholic world, of which, these two wicked, they presented themselves in the Lodge as theological and historical exponents of high lineage.
.
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the left) and his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the right)
Rome has outlived the individual Popes for the simple fact that Rome is the Church, that Rome is Peter. It is therefore urgent to explain to the Holy Father that the Roman squares are not managed with furberie argentine and with those effect blows perhaps suggested by that clumsy communications expert Antonio Spadaro S.J. The squares of Rome have brought their popes in triumph, if necessary, the Romans let themselves be slaughtered to allow the safe escape of their Pontiff in a moment of riot or during the invasion of a foreign army. The crowded squares of Rome really and sincerely shouted "long live the Pope", ma … Attention: the squares of Rome were also angry with some Popes, several corpses of which ended up thrown into the Tiber, not buried in the Vatican caves surrounded by the devotion of the believers of Christ.
.
Rome and Roman times, which for twenty centuries has been a sign of Catholic universality, it must be understood and known, but also loved and respected, otherwise you run big risks, especially by a Supreme Pontiff applauded more and more by all that is not Catholic and which has always been historically and socially adverse to our Catholic world.
.
… change the music, change conductor, ma … the players are always the same.
In conscience I feel like saying that the epilogue of this pontificate risks being the whistles in the square. And when that happens, as I wrote [cf. WHO], we will be devoted children to defend the Holy Father Francis, those that he delighted in slapping several times to please the world of applauding ultra-secularists and pimp modernists who have now invaded the sacred palaces. And they, that after pleasing him they grabbed "the egg, the chicken and the hot ass', when the square screams against the Holy Father Francis, they will be safe and sheltered elsewhere, thereby resounding the terrifying phrase of the Gospel: «Then all the disciples, forsook him, fled» [cf. Mt 26,56]. And when at the end of the storm they will return, if anything, occupying positions even more prestigious than those they had managed to grab, from above the chariot of the new leader they will say that after all, They, the Holy Father Francis did not approve it that way; and if they approved it it was only because they had to do it for the homage due to the Supreme Pontiff, for the duty attached to their high ecclesiastical office.
.
It is a bitter prophecy which I entrust to the readers of the island of Patmos, we'll see then if the time, as has happened several times in various other past situations, will prove me right, assuming that I hope and pray that I am wrong, wishing I would never see my Supreme Pontiff whistled by Catholics, and at the same time defended by that atheist, anticlerical and communist radical chic by Eugenio Scalfari, defended by the Masonic Lodges that today, for incomprehensible mystery, they found themselves more loyal to the Roman Pontiff than the Swiss Guard; but if that happened, it is only because they delude themselves that they can destroy the Church from within, to the esoteric glory of the Great Architect of the Universe …
.
So pray with me so that I am wrong, totally wrong; so that tomorrow, for these words of mine written today, should make amends and publicly ask forgiveness with his head bowed and with ashes on his head.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
