What is happening to the Holy Father Francis? The reasons of a concern in a climate of unusual confusion

ecclesial topical

WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS? THE REASONS OF A CONCERN IN A CLIMATE OF UNUSUAL CONFUSION

.

The Holy Father should not take offense for any critical is the uprising. Especially if he wants to rebuild as it seems example of Christ, which he was criticized by the Pharisees; he too easily in what feels like Christ certainly considering Pharisees those who criticize him and reaches almost to boast of being criticized.

.

Author
John Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

PDF format Print article

 

.

.

some signs of ironic criticism appeared on the walls of the metropolitan center of Rome a year ago

The reasons of concern are simple and understandable: if a person that we value and love begins to show signs of infidelity against those values ​​for which the esteem and love, we obviously can not but worry, ask on what may depend on this decadence and what we can do to remedy it. Similar sentiments try us Catholics to the Holy Father, that with some growing, It gives worrying signs of not doing their duty to the supreme pastor of the Church.

.

Behaviors and Pope Francis ideas Today like large crowds, pastors and theologians attached to this world and to a self-styled progressive Catholicism, but in reality Modernist, as well as to non-Catholic circles.

.

Not that the Pope teach heresy, but nevertheless he walks on the edge of the ravine. But what happened to him? The answer is simple: Perhaps it is left to take the taste of power. Worldwide, therefore, It seems to have to depend on his word and his will. His fans They would like to convince him that there is no dogma, there is no sacrament, there is no tradition, there is no moral law, there is no institution of the Church and the state that he can not change his will, considering themselves increasingly under the influence of the Holy Spirit. It is undoubtedly a the event never happened before in the history of the Church.

.

But where is the keeper Roman Pontiff, thenterprete and defender of the faith deposit, supreme preacher of the Gospel, High Priest dispenser of the sacraments, zealous father, judge and physician of souls, guide in the ways of holiness to the kingdom of heaven, guarantor of order, the right, of Justice, of freedom, of progress and peace in the Church, light of the nations and save the world?

.

In this respect it is conceivable Pope Francis is currently tempted by the devil, master of that pride which leads to heresy. This could explain the frequent calls of the Pope to the fight against the devil, something quite unusual in the Popes, at least the last centuries, especially for concrete instructions that the Pope imparts, which suggests that he speaks from experience.

.

In fact I am convinced than ever in the history of the papacy Satan has launched against the papacy such a violent and insidious attack, and just about the most important office of the Pope, which it is the case of the doctrine of the faith. The attack on Pope Francis is the culmination of an action that Satan has instigated in the Church since the immediate post-conciliar, stir with a renewed modernism, especially in rahnerismo, under pretext of conciliar renewal. At the same time, from that moment, the power of darkness has deceived the episcopate instilling in it the illusory belief that it was no longer necessary to guard against heresies, and that the time of heresies and their relative sentence had ceased due to the climate of dialogue initiated by the Council and the implementation of the St John XXIII recommendation to seek what unites us and not what divides [see text, WHO]. Except that this profit warning, which serves to create peace and harmony, It was intended as an invitation to ignore the heresies, from which arise precisely divisions. The exhortation of the Holy Pontiff to not split was intended as an inducement not to take into account and therefore not to eliminate what divides.

.

Here, then, that in this way, the revived modernism, unrestrained in time by the bishops, in these fifty years it has increased constantly, to penetrate in the eighties of the twentieth century in the Pontifical Faculty and with Pope Benedict XVI in the Holy See. In this time period the papacy is seen progressively eroded and weakened in the fight against modernism for the lack of support of the bishops, among them began to penetrate the smart rahnerismo, fake supporter episcopate, when in fact it puts him against the Pope and to enslave him to the wishes of the laity. In this way, despite the valiant Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, personally critical of Rahner, the ministry directed by him never had the power to condemn. Only Saint John Paul II in 1993 encyclical veritatis Splendor [NN. 65-67, text WHO] He managed to condemn his moral doctrine.

.

A Pope can be sinful but not a heretic. We must therefore make it clear that It can not occur with the fact of a heretic Pope. whatever Catholic, Secretary of State-down can be a heretic, besides the Pope. The existence and thus the essence of the Church, universal sacrament of salvation, in his own immutable and indestructible identity and desired holiness and guaranteed by Christ, Originally it depends ultimately dogmatic teaching of the Pope. For this reason the Council of Florence 1442 He teaches that whoever disobeys or rebels against the Pope goes to hell. was not wrong when Pope Boniface VIII in saying that the pope's authority is supreme among all those that exist in the land, including thunderstorms, under that of Christ "all power was given to me in heaven and on earth" [Mt 28,18].

.

But a Pope can sin of temporalism or attachment to power in two ways: or claim to politically steer down from his spiritual power temporal affairs, interfering in them and removing the political rulers their autonomy, or by setting the entire papal ministry on a timeline or merely political, or at most anthropological, leaving on one side the apostolic and spiritual ministry. Is this, unfortunately, It seems to be the fault of Pope Francis. Never in fact in the history of the Church he happened to find himself in presence in it of heretics that go unpunished and both the persecution of the faithful by these currents heretical places occupants of power. Certain, heretics in the Church there have always been, but they were regularly expelled, or they themselves declared frankly not considered more Catholic.

.

The Holy Father should not take offense for any critical is the uprising. Especially if he wants to rebuild as it looks to the example of Christ, which he was criticized by the Pharisees; he too easily in what feels like Christ certainly considering Pharisees those who criticize him and reaches almost to boast of being criticized. Yes, some, there is a certain pharisaism in critical that some do, not to mention dell'astio and bad faith that animates many detractors, these pins that are instead critical lucid. However, he should be able to distinguish the adverse criticism preconceived, from those just and reasonable, of which should be taken into account, not to show proud and touchy.

.

Nevertheless grace, in this dramatic emergency, still it reaches everyone in the Church, including bishops and Pope, through the laity, simple faithful, journalists, intellectuals, politicians, writers, Philosophy, theology, prophets and mystics. There are also priests and religious. However, the Church is indestructible, despite the powers of hell they will continually accaniscano against it. If things continue, we have to hope for the conversion of the Pope and bishops, and thanks to the prayers of God's people. place all members of the earthly Church, including Pope, as long as they live here on earth, as sanctified in the Church, always run the risk of getting lost. They, to sanctify, They must be in communion with the Church, including Pope, because it is holy and source of sanctity, animated by the Holy Spirit. The Pope enjoys the holiness of the Church that he himself administers the sacraments to Christ's mandate. And the small army of prophetic lay people who will save the Church, It will also feed, obviously, the sacraments, the administration of which the high priest is the Pope.

.

Communion with the Church, therefore, means communion with the Pope, although these may be in mortal sin and as such internally outside the Church. Yet the Pope, even under these conditions deprecabili, He remains as head of the Church, principle of ecclesial communion, minimum legal.

.

They are wrong, therefore, those who speak of a Pope "schismatic". You see they do not know what a schism. It is indeed the separation from church, but by that very fact the Pope. Now, the Pope evidently can not be separated from itself, nor can excommunicate himself. The Pope is the only Catholic who can not be excommunicated. Here, however, it is a legal fact of the external forum. Whyiò not however prevent a Pope is out of the Church in the internal forum, as in a state of mortal sin. If the Church is holy, who is not holy it can not belong to the Church in the soul, but rather only with the body. Or rather for a mere legal fact-functional. It can continue to do the Pope, but it certainly will not do good and will not do as it should.

.

"From the malignant enemy defend me»

[from prayer Anima Christi]

Varazze, 29 August 2018

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanksgiving [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

About isoladipatmos

3 thoughts on "What is happening to the Holy Father Francis? The reasons of a concern in a climate of unusual confusion

  1. Father Cavalcoli, a question: If true how proudly acclaimed by many including the cardinal McCarrick, that their vote in the conclave of 2013 He was given a “friend” that would have guaranteed their protection and legitimacy, If so, one could assume a papal election simoniacal ?

Leave a Reply