Carlo Acutis, the Eucharist. Sometimes having crickets for the head is sterile and dangerous

/in /by

Carlo acute, The Eucharist. SOMETIMES HAVING CRICKETS FOR YOUR HEAD IS STERILE AND DANGEROUS

We have heard prophetic words, who are not only addressed to information professionals, But to each of us. Because everyone, today, we communicate. We do it in the family, at work, sui social, in communities. And every word, each image, every silence... is a fragment of culture, it is a choice of peace or conflict. The Pope told us that «peace begins with how we look, let's listen, let's talk about others".

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

The canonization of new saints it is always a moment of gift for the Church. For new figures who are models and intercessions for us who remain. Also to focus on some themes that those same saints explored and experienced in their lives.

Pope Leo, confirming the path taken so far by Pope Francis, confirmed the canonization of two saints: Carlo Acutis and Piergiorgio Frassati for the next one 7 September. If therefore in front of the new canonizations, a minimum of debate and reflection are always understandable, and indeed desirable even in a more theological speculative line, some exasperations on the theological and doctrinal assumptions of the saints themselves can be dangerous and sterile if not downright cloying.

The impression that, it seems to me, there is some recent writing behind it is not to enhance the work of a saint, which if as known, by faith, in itself we are obviously not asked to welcome it as the fourth person of the Trinity, however, we are not even asked to use it as a picklock to dismantle a classic vision of Eucharistic theology. This is the case of a recent article by Prof. Andrea Grillo on the Eucharistic theology of Carlo Acutis. An article that does not seem to fully capture the saint's potential. Let's now understand it one step at a time. First of all, let's focus on Carlo Acutis.

Carlo acute: A SAINT OF THE INTERNET OF THINGS[1]

Carlo Acutis, born in London in 1991 and moved to Milan shortly after, he is a figure venerated by the Catholic Church, known for his early and deep faith. His biography reveals a short but intense life, characterized by an extraordinary devotion and an exceptional talent for information technology, which he put at the service of his spirituality. Since I was a child, Acutis showed a notable inclination towards faith. This innate devotion led him to ardently desire to receive his First Communion, which was granted to him in advance, at the age of seven. From that moment, daily Mass, Eucharistic adoration and the rosary became pillars of his day. He attended schools with the Marcelline Sisters and subsequently the Leo XIII Institute, distinguishing himself as a bright and sociable student. Parallel to his studies, Acutis developed a notable passion for information technology, becoming self-taught and earning the nickname of “computer genius”. This skill was not a mere feat for him hobby, but an instrument of evangelization. At just fourteen years old, created a website dedicated to cataloging the Eucharistic miracles recognized by the Church, a work that became an instrument of evangelization worldwide, attracting the attention of numerous faithful. His objective was to make known the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, spreading the faith through new technologies.

Despite his profound spirituality, He was acutely ill when he was young, who loved playing football, playing video games and spending time with friends. His charity was a distinctive trait: he used his savings to help the homeless and dedicated his time as a volunteer in soup kitchens. He was also a point of reference for his classmates, helping them with their studies and offering support to those facing bullying or family difficulties.

In October of 2006, Acutis' life was abruptly ended from a diagnosis of fulminant leukemia. He faced his illness with surprising serenity, offering his sufferings for the Pope and for the Church. He died on 12 October 2006, at the age of 15 year old. His reputation for sanctity spread rapidly, leading to the opening of his beatification process in 2013. Pope Francis declared him Venerable in 2018 It is in the 2020 he recognized a miracle attributed to him, paving the way for his beatification, occurred on 10 October 2020 to Assist. His body is preserved and exposed for veneration in Assisi.

Carlo Acutis is today considered a model of holiness for young people in the digital age, often called “God's influencer” or “the cyber-apostle of the Eucharist”, for its ability to combine faith and technology.

Being personally linked to the digital preaching apostolate, I believe that this propensity for spreading the faith on the internet is one of the points of light, where all young people can take model and inspiration, to become "digital cyber preachers", without becoming bigots or extremists.

AN EXCESSIVE SKIRMISH

Professor Andrea Grillo, in his article The young Carlo Acutis and Eucharistic rudeness [2], offers a critical examination of the theological interpretation of the Eucharist conveyed by the figure of Blessed Carlo Acutis, with particular attention to the insistence on the so-called "Eucharistic miracles". Ask Grillo if you ask him to come to you, a "super-communicator", may have been oriented towards such a "distorted" and "one-sided" understanding of the Eucharist, focused on "miracles" rather than on the genuine ecclesial value of the sacrament.

The Professor carefully examines the official website of the Carlo Acutis Association, in particular the section dedicated to Eucharistic miracles, and critically analyzes the introductory texts written by Cardinal Angelo Comastri, by Monsignor Raffaello Martinelli and the Dominican father Roberto Coggi, who was also my teacher of natural philosophy during the years of my education in Bologna. Grillo defines these texts as «old … heavy … obsessive", suggesting that they embody a "bad theology" imposed on Acutis by "bad teachers". He highlights inconsistencies and outdated theological views in their writings, like the defensive preface by Cardinal Angelo Comastri, the justification of miracles as “occasions” to address other topics by Monsignor Paolo Martinelli, and Father Roberto Coggi's old-fashioned understanding of the words of consecration. The Professor argues that this emphasis on physical miracles distracts attention from the "true" and”unique" Eucharistic miracle, which resides in ecclesial communion and in the unity between the sacramental body and the ecclesial body. The "Eucharistic rudeness", concludes Grillo, it is not attributable to the young Carlo Acutis, but rather to the adults who promoted these unbalanced interpretations, finally proposing one “distorted fixation on Eucharistic miracles” as a role model for young people.

HAVING CRICKETS IN YOUR HEAD

If on the one hand I concede that excessive attention to Eucharistic miracles "carried by adults" in a devotionalistic and almost "eucharistolatric" way risks not understanding the true meaning of Adoration in Jesus Christ present in the body, blood, soul and divinity and also in the Eucharist as communion of the new people of God [3], it seems to us that the professor's focus is not on dismantling a false Eucharistic devotion, ma, as for the opposite, to minimize to the point of almost describing as obsolete the conception of the substantial presence of Christ in the Eucharistic species. Although this is not explicitly said, the the way things are seems excessive. If you really wanted to hit only a "eucharistolatric" tendency, I personally think it is more right to also exalt the passages of goodness of Acutis himself and his desire to commune in Christ also via the internet. Skipping over the reference to the next saint, every reference seems to be designed to attack the doctrine of the real presence, without doctrinally valid reasons.

So jokingly, compared to the professor's positions, I wrote some time ago that this propensity to use Carlo Acutis as a picklock to unhinge "the closed ones left at the Tridentine Council" or as a springboard to skip all the beauty of the reflection on Eucharistic contemplation, this propensity is like having crickets in your head. Three jumps — long, exaggerated and out of focus — of a cricket which I think goes a bit’ resettled. We will now try to answer promptly, documents in hand, to the positions of the Professor.

"Old" and "out of fashion" Eucharist? The truth about the Eucharist as a real presence has no age and cannot be "out of fashion" as Coke Zero will probably become in fifteen years. The doctrine of the Real Presence of Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament is the heart of our faith and an immutable pillar, not a passing "fad".. The Council of Trent solemnly affirmed that Christ is «truly, truly and substantially" present in the Eucharist [4]. The Second Vatican Council, far from denying this truth, he explored it further, urging us to participate more fully and consciously in the Eucharistic Sacrifice [5] .Carlo Acutis, with his life, it simply tempted us to remind ourselves of the beauty and power of this eternal truth, demonstrating that it can inflame the hearts of every generation. He tried to make digital and virtual communion starting from real communion with the Eucharistic Christ. If the Eucharist is truly "the source and summit of all Christian life" [6] then it is not at all inessential, but the center of everything.

Eucharistic Miracles vs. the «True Miracle»? Eucharistic miracles recognized by the Church, although they are not "objects of faith" like dogmas, they can be a great help to our faith. Monsignor Raffaello Martinelli, in one of the texts that presents Carlo's exhibition, explains that they can "constitute a useful and fruitful aid to our faith". They are extraordinary signs that God, in His infinite wisdom, offers us to strengthen our adherence to the Mystery. Saint Thomas Aquinas himself explained how the properties of flesh and blood are substantially expressed in the Eucharistic species, even if this property inheres in God by a miracle [7]. This reminder is truly necessary for us who could not worship those properties in the glorious body of Christ, because they were born centuries and millennia after the presence of the Incarnate Word on earth. These phenomena do not eliminate the true miracle of Transubstantiation, but they can help highlight it visibly, leading many to a deeper faith in the Real Presence. Carlo Acutis did not "neglect" the true miracle, but he used these signs to lead others to the heart of that Mystery which for him was "my highway to Heaven".

“Eucharistic rudeness” and "bad teachers"? These propositions of the Professor seem imprudent to us. No theological article authorizes us to process the intentions of other theologians. Father Roberto Coggi, Monsignor Paolo Martinelli and Cardinal Angelo Comastri seem almost described as bad teachers, bearers of an obsolete and stale theology, that, as described, it seems almost distant from Catholic doctrine. We don't think this is the case. Let's read together what the Church tells us. The words of consecration, as the Catechism teaches us (n. 1353), they have their fulcrum in the words of Christ: «This is my Body… This is my Blood…». The Missal reformed in 1970 he took up this formula by translating it from Latin: and in fact he thus proved the essential words that operate the Sacrament remain those instituted by the Lord. How all this can fall into the category of "rudeness" or "fantasy", or bad workmanship, It completely escapes me. None of the authors mentioned above, Furthermore, has never denied the importance of the Eucharist as the Communion of the New People of God, and in particular Father Coggi, in his beautiful book The church, fruit of his meditations on Radio Maria, writes;

«The Church is not presented by the Council only as the mystical Body of Christ, but also as the new People of God. On the contrary, it can be said that the Council particularly emphasized this aspect of the Church, that is, the Church is the People of God. This is demonstrated by the fact that the Council dedicates an entire chapter to this topic among the eight that comprise it The light. In fact the second chapter of the dogmatic constitution The light on the Church is titled: The People of God. Seeing the Church as the People of God opens many perspectives. First of all, it underlines the continuity of the New Testament with the Old Testament: as Israel was the People of God of the Ancient Covenant, thus the Church is the People of God of the New Covenant. It also underlines the historical aspect of the Church. The denominations we have examined in past broadcasts, when we said that the Church is the Kingdom of God, the Temple of God, the mystical Body of Christ, focus our attention on the Church's connection with God, with the Holy Trinity, with the risen and glorious Jesus, that is, they underline the eternal dimension of the Church. But the Church does not only have this aspect, which in a certain sense takes her away from the world and history. The Church is also inserted into human history, the Church walks through time. Saying that the Church is the People of God, the People of God pilgrimage through history towards the goal of eternity – like the ancient People of Israel wandered in the desert towards the promised land -, to say this is to grasp an essential aspect of the Church" [8].

It is truly a splendid passage to also understand the Church as the people of God. In short, attention to the Real Presence is not inattention towards the faithful: but of attention to the core of the Mystery that reaches the faithful. Accusing those who try to communicate the centrality of the Real Presence of "bad theology"., also through popular devotion and miracles, it means not understanding the plurality and richness of the ways through which the faith is transmitted and lived.

Conclusions

The future saint Carlo Acutis is a model of holiness precisely because of his ardent Eucharistic faith, a shining example for all of us and for young people. A non-devotional faith anchored in semi-pagan or Protestant heritage. Acutis' faith is a Eucharistic faith that helps us repeat the action of the little apostle John at the Last Supper. That is, in front of Jesus he rested his head on the chest of Jesus on his Sacred Heart. And in that "huddle" he abandoned all of himself to God. So do we during adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, we can rest our heads on His Sacred Heart. Abandon all our anxieties, all our fears, and also offering everything we have to Him. A beautiful moment of prayer that, from the heart, I also wish Professor Andrea Grillo.

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 23 July 2025

.

For further information

– Council of Trent, Session XIII, Decree on the Eucharist, Canon 1. See. Denzinger-Hünermann, Enchiridion, definitions and declarations on matters of faith and morals, n. 1651.

– Vatican Council II, Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy Holy Council, n. 14.

– Vatican Council II, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church The light, n. 11.

– San Tommaso Aquino, QUESTION, III, q. 77, a. 1.

– Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1353.

– R.Coggi, The church, ESD, Bologna, 2002, 81.

NOTE

[1] I'll summarize from here https://biografieonline.it/biografia-carlo-acutis

[2] If ban

https://www.cittadellaeditrice.com/munera/il-giovane-carlo-acutis-e-la-maleducazione-eucaristica/

[3] The communion of the faithful in Christ does not exist without the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, although this too, by the way, seems to be hired by the professor.

[4] Denzinger-Hünermann, n. 1651

[5] Holy Council, n. 14.

[6] The light, n. 11

[7] QUESTION, III, q. 77, a. 1, Summa Theologica III, q.76,a.8.

[8] R.Coggi, The church, ESD, Bologna, 2002, 81.

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Carlo Acutis. The factory of the saints passed on the examination of criticism by the theologian Andrea Grillo

/in /by

Carlo acute. The factory of the saints passed on the examination of criticism by the theologian Andrea Grillo

A debate was recently raised in some ways interesting, Even with some controversy, resulting from the interventions of Professor Andrea Grillo. His punctual criticisms and perplexities were aimed at how Blessed Carlo Acutis is officially presented and on the ecclesiastical advertisement that developed around him, which, according to him, It would be affected by a backward religious sensitivity, which would hold no account of the whole path made by the Church in the years of the post council on the subject of Eucharist.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

The popular saying, «Joking with infantrymen, Leave the saints alone ", In recent times it seems to have lost value towards the one who is considered the modern blessed par excellence: Carlo Acutis; soon raised to the honors of the altars together with the other young blessed Piergiorgio Frassati.

A short time ago comments have started to circulate about the opportunity of the canonization of Carlo Acutis; they came mostly - and I say it by exemplifying a lot -, with so -called conservative environments. The notes thickened around the speed of the canonization process, which appeared to them more a promotion of ecclesiastical policy than an invitation to holiness. As follows questions about the figure of the next saint who would have little to propose to today's young people, who travel on the network much faster than the blessed considered "information technology", Just for creating a simple website on Eucharistic miracles. It's still, criticisms were moved to the constant presence of the Acutis family; This too is a novelty tolerated by the Church that instead, in the past, It prohibited any public intervention by family members, As in the case of the mother and brothers of the young Santa Maria Goretti. Instead, today's situation where mothers promote the Holy Son promote, or the children and grandchildren who run to keep conference on their father, Mother, grandfather or grandmother high to the honors of the altars.

More recently, from a different front, An interesting debate was raised in some ways, Even with some controversy, resulting from the interventions of Professor Andrea Grillo, Liturgy professor at the Roman University of Sant'Anselmo, reported on his page facebook and on his blog. His punctual criticisms and perplexities were instead aimed at how Blessed Acutis is officially presented and on the ecclesiastical advertisement that developed around him, which, according to him, It would be affected by a backward religious sensitivity, which would hold no account of the whole path made by the Church in the years of the post council on the subject of Eucharist. In particular, He used the expression "bad education" by referring to the overflowing attraction towards the miraculous, underlined in the presentation of Blessed Carlo. Says Grillo:

«How is it possible that the whole path that the Church has made in the last 70 year old, on the level of understanding the ecclesial value of the Eucharist and its celebration, has been communicated in such a distorted way to the young burning communicator, so much that he suggests an understanding so incurred, so defective, so unilateral?».

He therefore moves a criticism, More than Blessed, never questioned, rather to the presentation that is made of him e, rcuardo all'acutis, If his was a passion towards the Eucharistic miracles, According to the professor this was not well addressed. From these statements that I have very summarized, a debate was born that, as always happens, provides favorable and against. Perhaps some claims of the teacher have been able to appear at times pungent, I am referring to those aimed at the famous Motti del Beato, who decreed their luck: "Not I but God" and "everyone is born original but many die photocopies". Nonetheless, Some questions raised are hardly circumvented, aimed above all at the promoters of the cause of canonization and not to the saint, who have "stopped" too unilaterally on the miraculous aspect of the presentation of the Eucharist.

Some problems are likely to emerge sooner or later, Regardless of the canonization of the young Blessed Acutis, Following the new rules issued by John Paul II, also early holy, which have made it possible to accelerate the times to ensure that contemporary figures could be presented, However, in the expense of the loss of a historical perspective and the impossibility of assessing the permanence of a memory and inspiration. The discourse in this circumstance becomes even more delicate because we speak, The Other Brother, of a boy who died at a very young age who, according to the agreed testimonies, humanly showed great enthusiasm, generosity and courage and that the Catholic Church has decided, with simplified procedures compared to the past, but not for this superficial, to propose as a possible model for everyone, especially for young people.

The process that leads to the canonization of a saint it is complex and delicate together. Eventually, It is like a delivery or a gift that the Church makes to all the faithful, When he recognizes the virtues of one of his children. But the faithful - and this often does not happen -, they should have that necessary maturity that comes from theological formation and beyond, that sense of faith which leads to a healthy discernment and critical spirit. Let's think, for example, to the current trend to consider all canonized as doctors of the Church, giving their writings an exorbitant value. While instead we should know that the canonization of a saint does not mean, that fact, that everything he has written or said is to be considered a colorful gold. All the more so when we are faced with the canonization of a teenager, which will certainly have had a non -complete or exhaustive formation. Once, to say, Only children or martyred teenagers were taken into consideration as saints, as in the famous limit of the unaware, Yet very venerated, Innocent saints.

Even if you don't want to exasperate doctrinal problems highlighted by the prof. Andrea Grillo, of understanding of the Eucharist above all, But also with regard to eternal fate - I refer to the statements of our blessed about the desire to skip purgatory thanks to the hospital sufferings - there is no doubt that suits the shepherds and to follow the faithful the ability to know how to skillfully discern everything, knowing how to bring out, According to the evangelical saying: "New things and ancient things" (Mt 13,52).

In my opinion, The gift that Blessed Carlo Acutis is doing to the Church this is it. He unfortunately, as we know, He did not have time to develop a structured knowledge of Eucharistic theology or other aspects of the Christian mystery and stopped at an intuition that has become passion and devotion in him. Of course, It is easy for us to mention San Tommaso d'Aquino, Insigne theologian, where he discusses the Eucharistic miracles and limits their meaning (cf.. QUESTION, III, 76, 8) and compare what may appear to appear an adolescent fixation of our blessed. But the fact is precisely this: that we would compare a theological speech with something that is not theological speech and does not want to be. It is precisely passion and devotion. Not everything can be perfect as we would like it or we expect. We saw it in the emblematic case of Medjugorje, where the Holy See in the end promote the religious experience that you live in that place, while he downgraded the firmness of the Marian messages that started from there, considering them only presumed, In fact, not recognizing them as authentic.

Casomai we can ask ourselves - and in this he helps the blessed Carlo Acutis - Why after the Council of Trent many devotions were born that enriched the Christian experience, that put the simplicity of life in the center, interiority, common life? It was a much more secular than clerical movement, which in itself did not have its own elaborate and structured theology, Yet it translated the Christian faith into a sensitivity, in practices, in ways of living. And instead this did not happen following the last council. We have not been able to renew those devotions, nor give birth to others, despite all the theological and ecclesiological effort of the liturgical movement that, If on the one hand he had reduced many devotions, on the other hand he offered content, Insights and new opportunities for renewed paths. As it is possible that such a rich and vital understanding has not also become devotion, Sensitivity and form of language? So today we are faced with a modern blessed teenager who has thrown himself passionately on aspects of the Eucharist considered devotional, like eucharistic miracles, to which all the most recent acquisitions on that important mystery have not been received. E, According to the presentation that is made of that blessed, It seems that all that wealth has not passed even to the promoters of the cause of Carlo Acutis, even to those who promote forms that leave, as it were, perplexed, like that of a transmission YouTube 24h on 24h of the sepulcher of Blessed Carlo.

The question about why we don't have devotions today that take into account the wealth of the latest acquisitions, who know how to tie liturgical life and testimony of faith marked by the Gospel, With at its center the Eucharist which together is the landing and source of the life of the believer and the communities, It is not so peregrine. In light of two other facts, the second of which is somewhat painful. The first is that the whole course of the process that led to the beatification and now to the canonization of Blessed Acutis, as well as the spread of his cult, They took place during the pontificate of Pope Francis. In Carlo we find the example, indeed, of that "holiness of the next door" to which papal exhortation hints Rejoice and rejoice the 2018. Really, the post synodal exhortation of the 2019, Christ lives, explicitly appoint the blessed, despite being still venerable at the time and he even dedicates him more than one reference (no. 104-107). Someone asked: How is it possible, also from this point of view, that nothing to "reconcile" has been transmitted; Since Pope Francis was greeted as the first pontiff son of the Council?

The second fact is that today, According to the investigations on religiosity in Italy and in particular that of young people, It must be admitted that if we have a next saint boy on one side with a passion and devotion to the Eucharist, Perhaps little formed; on the other there is a great majority of young people and young people who have no devotion to the Eucharist, Last to the "ecclesial value of the Eucharist and its celebration". Is this, For almost all of them, After years and years of catechism and training in specific groups. Here too someone said, probably exaggerating, but without going too far from the truth, which remained only a "some humanitarian and ecological value".

Why all these questions and the debates arising from the canonization of Blessed Carlo Acutis do not remain a sterile exercise or, As often happens lately also within the ecclesial community, a mark your field, still distancing others who think differently, it would be useful to treasure it. And therefore a reflection would be important at all levels, Starting from the highest in the church, On how to resume a path of training to the Christian life of young people who are serious, that takes into account multiple experiences, but also to start offering solid food to the boys, Without bordering them, of course, But not even taking them simply for the hair, because otherwise they run away or bore themselves. Certain something is being done, But I think the time has come not to waste any more time. The treasures of the Word of God, of liturgical life, understanding the Church compared to these and its tradition, The thousand and more experiences and testimonies of Christian life need to be placed again in the center to make them become culture and why not, also devotion, Passion for Christian life lived in modern times. For the demanding task I imagine that the Church expects the substantial intercession of the two next saints.

From the Hermitage, 23 July 2023

 

 

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.