The Synod of the young. the Church, after the Shoah of the catholic world, will be judged to the new Process of Nuremberg, where cardinals and bishops will reply to the judges: “I only obeyed the higher orders”.

/in /by

— ecclesial news —

THE SYNOD OF THE YOUNG. THE CHURCH, AFTER THE SHOAH OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, WILL BE JUDGED TO THE NEW PROCESS OF NUREMBERG, WHERE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS WILL REPLY TO THE JUDGES: “I ONLY OBEYED THE HIGHER ORDERS”.

.

In the most inappropriate historical-ecclesial moment, a Youth Synod is taking place, while the visible Church, after the Holocaust of Catholicism, is about to end up in the Nuremberg court, which will issue a sentence that will remain written in history. In the course of this process, the culprits who brought the Church into the court of justice before the eyes of the world will be judged for committing great crimes against the Church, the mystical body of Christ [cf. With the 1, 12-20]. And as happened seventy years ago with the Nazi leaders, we will hear cardinals and bishops, respond to the judges: “I only obeyed the higher orders”.

.

article in the original Italian version

.

PDF article print format

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Italian presbyter

The impression one has is that the synods are probably set up as the Assembly of Deputies of the Soviet Union, or as it is now the Parliament of North Korea. We admit that we can also discuss within the synods, as happened during the Synod on the family. Naturally, that we proceed to discuss, the synods are celebrated precisely for this purpose. What is the purpose of the discussions, however, when in the final document, previously, we have seen the approval of what the Synod Fathers have rejected decisively and with a broad threshold? In fact, if the Court of Miracles, as I call it, or the Magic Circle, as Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller calls it, already has a ready and approved program, what is the usefulness of synods? Perhaps saving the appearance of collegiality in the same way that the young dictator of North Korea, Kim Jong, wants to have a semblance of parliamentary democracy? And what happened to the dissidents of Korea, maybe they ended up tied on the missiles and then launched during the experimental tests?

.

We come to the agenda of the Court of Miracles or the Magic Circle : the Youth Synod will have to serve, as already amply demonstrated, to offer some recognition to the LBGT lobby. And although the youth representatives have never used or mentioned this acronym in their programmatic documents, the mention was made by His Eminence Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisserri, without neglecting to express himself in an imprecise and contradictory way, which in some way is tantamount to lying [see HERE]

.

The use of the acronym LGBT, which means: lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual, is first of all a question of form and law, which later could have implications in the doctrine and the magisterium. Let’s try to understand: if in the work Ai organizations Commentary — which has nothing to do with gays, but with the famous jurist Gaius who compiled his comments the year 180 a.C. — the problem of oral sex had been inserted according to the jurisprudence of the principality of Augustus, dating back to 30 b.C., this erotic practice would then have a legal status in the system of Roman law. However, considering that the problem of oral sex does not exist in the law, it can not be inserted as a legal institution, even applying other laws in the most extensive form. And it does not exist because, in the law, there is no such thing as the legal institution of oral coitus. Jurisprudence can not treat or regulate what for the law does not exist. That’s why in any kind of juridical system, both in Roman law and in common law, the use of words and terms is always very delicate, because the law, long before punishment, which is only the final act, aims to recognize , establish and then adjust. And a term inserted into juridical language automatically becomes a juridic term.

.

To this must be added, as an example, a fact that few in the visible Church of today can deny: in many Catholic theological institutes, when we speak of the Most Holy Eucharist, the theologies and terminologies drawn from Lutheran lexicon, are increasingly used; for example, the Lutheran terminology of consubstantiation. If in some Roman Pontifical universities one dares to refer to scholasticism and Thomism, then to the theological term of transubstantiation, one risks being derided or indicated as pre-conciliar (!?). And the mockers, whose prerogative is the most stupid ignorance, will continue to ignore that one of the two Supreme Pontiffs of the Second Vatican Council, the one who managed it, has brought forward and then closed, the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, that soon will also be canonized, he defined as opportune and not replaceable this theological term of transubstantiation [Encyclical The Mystery of the Faith, no. 47, text HERE]. Or perhaps we must deduce that Blessed Pontiff Paul VI was actually a pre-conciliar? As I have written several times: in the visible Church of today the decrees of beatification and canonization of the Roman Pontiffs are signed with one hand, with the other the documents that strike, or in some cases annul, their supreme magisterium.

.

Today we live in a visible Church where we can define the term of transubstantiation as scholastic-archaeological, then reject it in the halls of the pontifical universities. However, at the same time, we can insert ecclesiastical lexical terms such as LBGT, with the risk that this acronym luciferian assumed by the vocabulary of the Magisterium of the Church. And all this, cannot disconcert only the Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, with all the coryphaeum of journalists True Pontifical, for which never, as «at the time of this epochal revolution», things had gone so well. The facts show that things, at the height of the Pontifical Russian Revolution, are so good that the churches are increasingly empty, the disappointed faithful, the depressed clergy and the missing vocations. The abandonment of the priesthood has never been as numerous as in the last five years of the history of the Church, even if the Congregation for the Clergy is silent on the statistical, because it is presided over by another friend of the Court of Miracles, or Magic Circle.

.

His Eminence Cardinal Charles Joseph Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia

Thanks be to God, His Excellency Mons. Charles Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia, made his voice heard and recalled the importance of using correct words [cf. chronicle: HERE, HERE], because at the level of Catholic doctrine, substance is linked to words. And this should be known by all those who have studied, even in a non-exhaustive way, the first great dogmatic councils of the Church, where, to define the nature of Christ God, we have resorted to precise terms modulated by terminology of Greeks philosophers, such as concept of ὑπόστασις [Hypostasis or hypostatic nature].

.

Someone, to define today — and therefore clarify — the various forms of exercise of human sexuality, since “male and female God created them” [Gen 1, 26-27], perhaps wants to insert into the ecclesial lexicon terms such as LGBT, thus giving life to a new quatripostatic human nature: to the lesbian nature, gay, bisexual and transsexual?

.

The Synod on the family has left a divided and disoriented Church, as well as several deaths due to sudden infarcts in the ranks of the Lord’s vineyard. And after the attempt to erase adultery, today the Synod of Youth has opened up, which seems to want to legitimize the various practices of sexual expression, without clarifying — as Archbishop Charles Chaput laments holyly — that LGBT Catholics cannot exist, and the Church cannot legitimize their existence. With another paradoxical example, we can ask: can a subject be defined as Catholic-atheist and claim, as atheist, his full membership in Catholicism? Yes, he can do it exactly to the extent that, a one transsexual proud of his transsexualism, he can call himself a catholic-transsexual and claim full right of citizenship in the body of the Catholic Church and claim full legitimacy of all his demands. Because if the enthusiastic singers of the «epochal revolution» had not noticed it, is completely new figure of Catholicism is born: the Catholic atheists. And these atheistic Catholics have a diabolical prerogative: to persecute the faithful believers fiercely.

.

Of the Archbishop by Philadelphia we invite you to read the article «Charity, clarity, and their opposite» [article, HERE]

.

We will see how this Synod will end, but above all we will see if, as in the previous one, what will be rejected by the Synodal Fathers will then end in the final document, if anything hidden, once again, in some ambiguous expression or footnote, which is equivalent to saying … “I am intelligent, you are stupids!”. But what counts is listening to everyone, giving the impression of being synodal, collegial and above all democratic, just like the Korean dictator Kim Jong, who first calls the puppet Parliament of North Korea, then does exactly what he wants.

.

After this Synod, opened with the insertion of the LGBT quatripostatic dogma, not required by anyone in the Instrument of Work, in 2019 the Amazonic Synod, will also open, for to discuss the granting of the priesthood to married men. Attention, everything only … to experiment. Meanwhile, in the Diocese of Rome, even if the fact has not made any news, the general rehearsals are already underway: a few days ago he was appointed “parish priest” of a metropolitan parish — of course: to experiment — a permanent deacon, arrived in canonical with his wife and four children. And this family nucleus, from the official page of the Deacons of Rome, which is also a filial of the Neocatechumenal Movement, has been indicated as … «diaconal family» (!?) [CF. service: HERE]. Having said this, I would like to know: can the members of my family, who have a presbyter in their family, be called the “presbyteral family”? And my mother and my brother can be called “presbyteral mother” and “presbyteral brother”. Obviously extending the title to my “presbyteral sister-in-law” and to my “presbyteral nephew”? And perhaps we want to forget my cat, which would have the title of “presbyteral cat”? Needless to say that the speech would be really long, because those who do not know the story is condemned to repeat it in a pejorative form. It is worth remembering, even if briefly and rapidly, that the diaconate, now called permanent, fell into disuse as an autonomous order and became a step in the process of presbyteral ordination. In fact, in Rome, between the eighth and tenth centuries, the deacons had acquired a pre-eminent role. The deacons were at the head of the main churches and did not even want to be ordained presbyters, because then, from these prestigious churches, they became directly bishops. The permanent diaconate will thus be restored only after a thousand years, by the Second Vatican Council. And note that not all the dioceses of the world have ordained permanent deacons, who are absent, for example, in most African countries, in order not to generate confusion among Catholic populations; and especially where, for anthropological and cultural reasons, the rules relating to the chastity of celibacy by priests are not always applied. In the heart of Europe, in Poland, the first two permanent deacons were ordained only four decades after the Second Vatican Council, in 2009.

.

Married priests have always existed in the Eastern Catholic clergy, but they could exercise their ministry only in the dioceses belonging to their rite; a rite regulated, among other things, also by the Code of Canon Law of the Eastern Churches. However, since great general tests are under way, many of these priests and their families have been received in various Italian dioceses, beginning with the Archdiocese of Perugia, whose archbishop is not a bishop among many, but the president of Episcopal Conference of Italy. Faced with this, I limit myself to asking: in the event of disputes involving a married priest, what right will be applied, the Latin or that of the Eastern Churches? Obviously I know well that the canon law has been replaced by pure free will, which then turns into authentic arrogance that comes to life from the lack of any rule, but the rhetorical question sounds good, and even if it is useless, I do the same. Regarding the possible incardination in the dioceses of the Latin rite, as may happen, the incardination of married priests of the Eastern rite, specifically Latinized, since they are useful for the general tests under way, which aim to please the Head and the circle of his most trusted advisors? All this could be explained by His Eminence Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, who is metropolitan archbishop of Perugia and president of the Italian bishops, and which houses two married priests in his diocese, to anticipate the decisions of the Synod of the Amazon, which we remember: the decisions have already been taken before the opening of the Synod [service HERE].

.

Having said this, a question arises: for the region of the Amazon, an experiment is asked to consecrate priests married men, because there is lack of clergy. In Rome, instead, for to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon, what a dramatic lack of clergy there is? Because looking at the diocesan yearbook we find that the metropolitan parishes are 332. The Roman presbytery has 1,256 presbyteries, to which are added 2,929 presbyters of other dioceses residing in Rome. To these secular priests, 5,317 members of the regular clergy (the presbyters of the various religious orders) and 87 other priests belonging to various personal prelatures are added [Official Yearbook of the Diocese of Rome: HERE]. In Rome there are therefore a total of about 9,580 presbyters, among Roman presbyters, presbyters residing in the diocese and presbyters of various religious families. The Diocese of Rome has about 2,350,000 baptized. If we divide the number of Catholic faithful with the number we will have this result: one priest for every 250 faithful. And all this in a Rome with increasingly empty churches. It is also good to specify that the territory of the Diocese of Rome is limited only to the Capital of Italy, because out of the city, in the Municipality of Rome, arise the suffragan dioceses. Question: was it therefore necessary, as an exotic experiment, to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon in the Mother and Mother Church of all the Catholic Churches? Therefore we note that while the Synod of Youth is being celebrated, the general rehearsals for the Amazon, from which the married priests will have to go out, to experiment, are already underway, because everything has already been established. I repeat: only to experiment and after convening the Pontifical Parliament of North Korea, where presumably dissidents end up on the heads of missiles fired during military exercises. Things are worse in Rome than in North Korea, never in the history of the Church has mercy made so many victims! A new term has also been born, not easily translatable: “the misericordiati“. And this term “be merciful” rhymes with “executed“, the sentenceds to death.

.

to open the video click on the image

If Cardinal Gerhard L. Müller, in a recent long interview with Raymond Arroyo, has returned to various topics: on the speech of the evil friends who surround the Roman Pontiff, who were sought by him with the lantern of Diogenes; therefore on the argument that His Excellency Monsignor Carlo Maria Viganò, did not say anything other than the truth [cf. HERE, HERE], this happened because the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is a true man of God. Add to what the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, at the anthropological level, contains in himself the strength of the Teutonic barbarian, in the noblest sense of the term. In fact, we remember that when the barbarians descended from northern Europe while the Roman empire was in agony, they found the holders of power, drunk and made up by women, engaged in playing inside the alcoves with young men [cf. my previous article, HERE]. Or, in other words: the Romans, during the decadence of the Empire, lived a LBGT lifestyle that had long absorbed the S.P.Q.R. lifestyle, an acronym that once summarized the concept and foundation of The Roman Senate citizens and later SPQR [Senate of the Roman People]. The difference, as I have often emphasized, was that the barbarians, struck by the virile temperament of the great Fathers of the Church, in that climate of total decadence, they were converted, in mass, to Christianity. In today’s Rome, the new barbarians, from whom should they be conquered to Christianity? Perhaps by four homosexuals clinging like polyps to the throne, to which all in all they are very useful, being the most devoted ruffians, the most interested servants, the most efficient spies, as well as easily managed and manipulated by the sovereign, who knows, one after the other , all the rotten corpses that remain locked up in their graves? And their tombs are very different from those of the ancient Pharisees [cf. Mt 23, 27-32], because the tombs of the Pharisees were at least well painted on the outside.

.

I am afraid that no one has analyzed the historical relationship that links the psychology of Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller to the history of his native country, which is Germany. Today the situation of the visible Church is comparable to the defeat of Germany in 1945, with Adolf Hitler locked up in the bunker of Berlin, along with the restricted court of his faithful, while faced with the defeat, the German army continued to fight, up to enlist teenagers of sixteen. To deceive the German people, word spread that the Great Secret Weapon would soon be completed and used. In the same way, today, the main propagandists of Pontifical Truth, not so much defend the indefensible — which can also be understandable and even justifiable on a human and psychological level — but show total insensitivity, while knowing all the details of the lives of many saints priests who have been totally marginalized and ruined, for not having accepted to become accomplices of a diabolical system of corruption, preferring to go to great suffering, without betraying the Church of Christ and coming to terms with evil. And this makes some Italian journalists of True Pontifical, unscrupulous men, real criminals deprived of basic Christian sentiments. So it is good to inform these people that the bridge over the river now overflows with patients spectators who await the passage of their bodies dragged by the current, when with an ease that would scandalize even the lowest level whores, after the next conclave, like chameleons they will change skin color. The is that instead they will not have to change color, they will have to change jobs, because in the face of every sigh, all the writings with which they have sustained the untenable and defended the indefensible, to the detriment of the truth and the innocent affected and injured, will be taken and thrown publicly on their faces. These journalists of Pontifical Truth have not even hesitated to falsify facts and news. They spread false news and concealed the truth to the detriment of the victims and the suffering of many holy priests. They “licked the ass” of the executioners, showing total indifference towards the victims affected and persecuted within the Church, of whom they knew very well the stories and the great sufferings. And all this, it is not simply inhumane, because it is really satanic. And the devil can never be allowed to enter through the window again, having thrown it out the door; and if by chance the Devil asks for forgiveness by pretending to be repentant, one must absolutely not believe him, because he is the Supreme Prince of Lies and deception.

.

After Adolf Hitler’s death, Germany was hit by a wave of suicides; whole families committed suicide. The most common phrase that ran between the good Germans which we remember were many — was: «I’m ashamed to be German». I have already heard this kind of phrase in private from bishops and presbyters many times: «Faced with this situation, I am ashamed to belong to this Church», implying that this shame is entirely linked to the ecclesial and ecclesiastical structure of this visible Church, certainly not to the mystery of the Church, which is the mystical Body of Christ.

.

As we know, from the Berlin bunker, we then moved on to the Nuremberg trial, where the main Nazi leaders were judged and condemned on the charred body of the Führer, but above all on the ruins of Germany. And many of the Nazi leaders were sentenced to death in that trial. Seventy-three years after the last great world war, the New Church of Mercy has removed the more remote and exceptional hypothesis of the death penalty from the Catechism. Therefore, if tomorrow something similar to the Nuremberg trial were to happen, we will be “merciful” to those responsible for the death of millions and millions of people, and we will entrust them to social services [cf. our previous articles: HERE, HERE, HERE].

.

The Nuremberg trial is about to be repeated in the Church. Tomorrow, sooner or later, on the disastrous ruins of destruction, while bishops and priests will tell the world «I am ashamed to belong to this Church», we will see before the judges an army of cardinals and bishops who will try to justify themselves by saying: «I only obeyed higher orders!». While the journalists of the former Pontifical Truth, who can no longer recycle themselves, will say on their side: «We have only written what we have been ordered to write!». Then the judges will ask: «Your Excellency … Your Eminence … Monsignor … but you realize that your obedience to the higher orders has covered the perpetrators of serious crimes and has seriously affected the innocent, subjected to every kind of suffering and anguish?» At that point the answer will be: «But I was bound by the pontifical secret!».

.

The death of Christ the Lord, in its substance, is renewed, and over time it is proposed in different ways. Not by chance, his glorious body, after the resurrection, still lives with the signs of passion. So today Christ died again on the cross because bishops and cardinals have «obeyed the higher orders», and when in the day of their judgment, God will ask them: «why did not you act in defense of the Church and of the People of God?». They will answer: «But I was bound by pontifical secrecy!».

.

It’s just a matter of little time. We let this monster give the last dangerous and deadly blows, because soon we will be in the great hall of Nuremberg, to listen to those directly responsible for the Holocaust of the Catholic Church that they say: «I have only obeyed the higher orders!». And we, precisely because of profound and authentic mercy, will guarantee them the expiatory grace of the gallows. Because we who today are suffering, anguished and persecuted in our home, we are the salvation and the future of the Church of Christ, of the pilgrim Church on earth. And no one will ever prevent us from fulfilling our mission for Christ, with Christ and in Christ. Because the church is of Christ, it is not of Peter, who is the Vicar of Christ, not his Successor. And the power given to Peter is not at all total and absolute as some would have us believe, indeed: it is a very vincolated power. The power of Peter is strictly vincolated to the deposit of the Catholic faith, of Tradition and of doctrine. Peter is not the absolute master of the Church, on the contrary: he is his first and faithful servant, called to guard the truth and to confirm his brothers in faith [cf. Page 22, 31-34]. Peter’s mission, is not to convene the “democratic” Parliament of North Korea. Peter’s mission is not to confuse the People of God, using ambiguous and unclear words, because Christ teaches us: «But let your statement be, “Yes, yes” or “No, no”; anything beyond these is of Evil» [cf. Mt 5, 37].

.

In the Holy Gospels, everything is very clear, no any “sly” has ever inserted ambiguous small footnotes. Having said this, it is still necessary to clarify: it is true, no priest, bishop or cardinal is obliged to be a hero. But for a priest, a bishop or a cardinal, it is certainly not a great human and Christian honor to be a rabbit who, opposite the judgment of history, replies: «I only obeyed the higher orders».

.

Rome, 7 October 2018

.

I apologize to the Readers if there were errors in my English translation.

.

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

 

The Synod of youth. The church, after the Holocaust of the Catholic world, It will be judged in the new Nuremberg Trials, where the cardinals and bishops will respond: 'But I only obeyed orders from above ! »

/4 Comments/in /by

- ecclesial news -

THE SYNOD OF YOUTH. THE CHURCH, AFTER THE HOLOCAUST OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, It WILL BE HELD IN NEW PROCESS OF NUREMBERG, WHERE THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS MEET THE COURTS: "BUT I HAVE ONLY obeyed OF OVER !»

.

When more inappropriate historical and ecclesial was held a synod of young people while the visible Church, after the Holocaust of Catholicism, It is going to end up on the dock at the Nuremberg trial, that on you will issue a ruling that will remain written in history. In the course of this process we will be judged one after the other all those on trial have led the visible church under the eyes of the world, after the commission of serious crimes consumed to the detriment of the Church the Mystical Body of Christ [cf. With the 1, 12-20]. And as happened seventy years ago, We feel cardinals and bishops meet: "I just obeyed the orders from above!»

.English version – English version

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

Doing process any intentions, the feeling one gets is that the synods are likely to be set as it was the Assembly of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union, or as it is now in the parliament of North Korea. Let us assume that within the synods can also discuss, as it happened during the Synod on the family. Of course, is being discussed, Synods are used for this purpose. What, however, they serve threads, then when the final document was seen approve what the Synod Fathers had rejected so also agreed and a large majority? If in fact the Court of Miracles, as I call it, or the Magic Circle, as Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller calls it instead, He has already prepared an agenda with a whole range of issues already established, but above all in fact already approved, because convene synods? Perhaps to give the semblance of collegiality in the same way in which the young dictator of North Korea, Kim Jong, He wants to give a semblance of parliamentary democracy? And what happened to the Korean dissidents, They are perhaps finished tied on the heads of the missiles launched then below for the experimental tests?

.

We come all’agenda from the Court of Miracles O Magic Circle : the Synod of young people will have to serve, as has already been amply demonstrated, to clear the LBGT lobby. And although the representatives of young people have never used or referenced in this acronym in their policy documents, There has, however, provided the Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisserri, not failing to express themselves imprecise and contradictory, which in some ways it seems tantamount to lying [please refer to chronicle, WHO].

.

The mention of Acronym LGBT, which as we know means lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender, It is above all a matter of form and law, which subsequently will then have implications not indifferent in terms of doctrine and magisterium. Let's try to understand: if you work Ai organizations Commentary — which incidentally has nothing to do with gays, but with the famous jurist Gaius who compiled their own commentaries in 180 about d.C. - it had been added to the problem of oral copulation according to the case law of the late principality Augusteo, from the year 30 circa a.C, is obvious that this pleasant erotic practice would first rank and dignity in the Roman legal system of law. Whereas, the problem of oral copulation, It does not exist in law and in fact in the case; I doubt there also can be reached, including implementation in the most extensive form other laws. It does not exist because, Always law and fact, there is precisely the legal institution of oral copulation. The law can not in fact treat or regulate what the law does not exist. That's why in any kind of legal system, both in those of the Roman plant both in those based on common law, the use of words and terms is always very delicate, because the Law, long before punish - the punishment is in fact only the extreme final act conclusive -, It aims to recognize, to establish, then to regulate.

.

Add to this, Always by way of example, a fact that few within the visible Church today can deny: in many Catholic theological institutes, for example by treating the Holy Eucharist, They are increasingly used theologies and terminology taken from the Lutheran lexicon, from consubstantiation. If certain Roman pontifical universities one dares to refer to the school and to Thomism, then at the end of transubstantiation, He runs the risk of being mocked or referred to as pre-reconcile (!?). E, the scoffers, prerogative of which it is the most crass ignorance, will step forward to ignore that one of the two Popes of Vatican II, the very one who has managed the, brought forward and then closed, the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, that day will be canonized, has defined as appropriate and non-replaceable this term theological [Encyclical The Mystery of the Faith, n. 47, text WHO]. And what we are we to infer that Blessed Pope Paul VI was in actual fact a pre-conciliar? But, as I wrote several times, in today's visible Church will sign with one hand the decree of beatification and canonization of the Roman Pontiffs, with the other hand they rather sign documents affecting, or in some cases zero, their supreme magisterium.

.

The fact that today we live in a visible Church in which you can define how the term transubstantiation school archeological, then reject it or contest it in the classrooms of the pontifical universities, but at the same time, however, they fit into the ecclesiastical vocabulary terms such as LBGT, with the risk that this Luciferian acronym then enter into the vocabulary of the Magisterium of the Church, can not touch and not just rattle Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, below with all the coryphaeus of Journalists true Pontificia for which ever, as "the time of this epochal revolution", things had gone so well. And that things, Russian Revolution in full Pontifical go well like never before had gone, prove increasingly empty churches, the lost and disillusioned believers, the clergy in disarray, the fall in vocations, abandonments priesthood as numerous as ever over the past five years, but on which, however, it is silent on a statistical level, the Congregation for the Clergy, chaired by another friend of Court of Miracles, O Magic Circle.

.

S. AND. Mons. Charles Joseph Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia

Like this, of The Assembly of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union Pontifical It has dawned, thank God, the voice of S.It is. Mons. Charles Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia, that prompted the use of correct words [cf. chronicle WHO, WHO], because in terms of Catholic doctrine, the words is then linked to the substance: words and outward signs are used to express the substance. What this should be familiar to anyone who has studied, not even in depth, the first great dogmatic councils of the Church, in which first of all to define the nature of Christ, God made use of precise terms modulated by greek philosophical lexicon, as the concept of ὑπόστασις [hypostasi, nature if seen].

.

Archbishop of Philadelphia invite you to read his article: "Charity, clarity and their opposite » [item WHO].

.

Someone, to define today - then sdoganare - the various forms of exercise of human sexuality, place God "male and female he created them" [Gen 1, 26-27], perhaps he wants to enter in the ecclesial vocabulary terms as LGBT, if anything, giving birth to a new nature quatripostatica, namely the lesbian nature, gay, bisexual, and transgender?

.

The Synod on the family He left a divided Church and disoriented, as well as several deaths from sudden heart attacks among the rows of the vineyard of the Lord. And after you have tried to clear adultery, It was followed by the Synod of young people in which it appears they are at once by attempting to clear the various practices of sexual expression, without posing the question - how to complain about a saintly Archbishop Charles Chaput - that LGBT Catholics can not exist, least of all the Church can legitimize the existence. O, said with another example, anything but paradoxical: a person can be called Catholic atheist and claim as such, ie as an atheist, its full membership in Catholicism? Yup, It can do it in exactly the same way that, a transsexual proud of their transsexualism, It can call himself a Catholic-transsexual and demand full citizenship rights in the Catholic Church Body and demand the full legitimacy of all its instances. Because, if the laudatori of the Russian Revolution Pontifical not they were aware, in different forms, just that we are going, to a figure entirely new Catholicism and Christian: Catholicism of the Catholic atheists, provided both as church and as a lay, the exercise of an evil prerogative, which it is to harass and persecute believers.

.

We'll see how it turns out even this Synod, but above all we will see if, as in the previous, what will be rejected by the Synod Fathers will end up in the final document, if anything hidden, Also this time, somewhat ambiguous expression or in some marginal notice placed at the bottom of page, the series ... "I crafty, you fools!”. But, the only matter, It is to listen to all, thus giving the impression of being Synod, collegiate and especially Democrats, just as is the Korean dictator Kim Jong, which first convened puppet parliament of North Korea, then does strictly what they like.

.

After this Synod that was opened by the insertion of Acronym dogmatic quatripostatico LBGT, not required by anyone in tool of labor, shortly after it opens another, the Synod Pan Amazon, which it has long been on the agenda of the priesthood clearance granted to married men. But beware, all alone ... to experiment. In the meantime, in the Diocese of Rome, although the fact has not called attention and produced news, They are already underway rehearsal, if we consider that a few days ago was named "pastor" of a metropolitan parish - of course it is: to experiment — a permanent deacon, He arrived in the rectory with his wife and four children. And this family, from the official page of the deacons of Rome, which are, however, a real branch of the Neocatechumenal Movement, It was listed as ... "diaconal family" (!?) [cf. service WHO]. Having said that let me know: members of my family, their joint having a presbyter, They may be referred to as "priestly family"? And my mother and my brother, They may be referred to as "mother priestly" and as "brother priestly", obviously extending the title to my "sister in law priestly" and my "priestly grandson"? And do we want to forget my "priestly cat"? Needless to say that the discussion would be very long, However, given that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it in the form pejorative, worth remembering, albeit briefly and quickly, that the permanent diaconate said today, He fell into disuse as the order and became only a passing stage for priestly ordination, after that just in Rome, between the centuries VIII and X, deacons had acquired a prominent role. The deacons were now at the head of the main churches and would not even be ordained priests, why then, these prestigious churches, had access directly to the episcopate. The permanent diaconate will be so restored only after a thousand years, from the Second Vatican Council. And note that not all the dioceses of the world, the bishops ordained permanent deacons, which are absent, for instance, in most African countries, to avoid causing confusion in Catholic populations; and in species where, for anthropological and cultural reasons, the rules related to the chastity of celibacy by priests are not always implemented. In the heart of Europe, in Poland, the first two permanent deacons have been ordained just four decades after Vatican II, In the 2009.

.

In the Eastern Rite Catholic clergy have always been married priests, but they could exercise their ministry only in belonging to their rite diocese; a regulated ritual, against the other, Also from the special Code of Canon Law of the Eastern Churches. Since, however, are being large rehearsal, here is that several of these priests and their families were welcomed in our various Italian dioceses, starting from the Archdiocese of Perugia, Metropolitan Archbishop of which is not a bishop among many, but the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference. I supersede two different facts of a legal nature, and I just ask: in case of any disputes involving a married priest, which law will be applied, the Latin or that of the Eastern Churches? Of course I know it well, that the canon law has long since been replaced by the more savage free will which then turns into the real arrogance that comes to life by the lack of any rule, But the rhetorical question sounds good, and even if the appeal equally useless. Next, as it regards the possible incardinated in the diocese of the Latin Rite, nicely how the priests incardinated married Eastern rite Latinized specifically for rehearsals underway, purpose of which is to please the Head of soviet Pontifical and the circle of his most trusted councilors? there, This could explain it to Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti himself, which it is Archbishop of Perugia and President of the Italian Bishops and home to two priests in his diocese married, to anticipate such decisions of the Synod of the Amazon, that we remember: He has already been taken before its opening [interview, WHO].

.

Having said that a question arises: in the Amazon, they ask themselves to experiment married priests, because the shortage of clergy is very high. Smell, instead, to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon, as a dramatic shortage of clergy there? Because giving a diocesan yearbook look we find that metropolitan parishes 332. The Roman presbytery counts 1.256 presbytery, to which are added 2.929 priests of other dioceses residents in Rome. To these secular priests are then added 5.317 members of the regular clergy, who are the religious priests, and others 87 Priests belonging to various personal prelature [see yearbook, WHO]. In Rome then they reside a total of about 9.580 Priests in the Roman priests, resident priests in the diocese and priests of various religious families. The Diocese of Rome has about 2.350.000 baptized, being divided between the number of diocesan priests living in the canonical territory, damage as a statistic to one priest for every 250 faithful about, all in a Rome with increasingly empty churches. You should then point out that the territory of the Diocese of Rome, It is limited only to the capital of Italy, because out of town, in the City of Rome, arise various dioceses suburbicarian. Request: it was therefore necessary, to exotic experiment, entrust a parish to a permanent deacon in the Mother Church and Mother of all the Churches of Catholic world? Let us act so that while we are celebrating the Synod of youth, They are already underway rehearsal for the Amazon that will give us married priests, It has already been established. I repeat, all alone to experiment and advance notice of Pontifical Parliament North Korea, where dissidents allegedly linked end on missile warheads fired during exercises, but make no mistake, because in Rome's mercy, to the be merciful, also happens a lot worse.

.

to open the video click on the image

If the Cardinal Gerhard Mueller, in a long interview with Raymond Arroyo - that deserves to be heard by all who understand English -, He is back on various topics. The argument from the bad friends who surround the Roman Pontiff, which if it is searched with Diogenes' lantern; S.It is the topic that. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò told nothing but the truth [cf. WHO, WHO], this was because the former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is a true man of God. Add to this that the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, about the human person, It encapsulates the strength of the Teutonic barbarian, in the most noble sense of the term war. Recall that when the barbarians descended from Northern Europe while the Roman Empire was in agony, They found the defending power drunk and made up by women committed to play in the alcoves with youngsters [cf. My previous article, WHO]. O, said in other words: the Romans were taken to live the LBGT lifestyle that had long since absorbed the lifestyle of S.P.Q.R, acronym that once epitomized the concept and foundation of The Roman Senate citizens, and thereafter SPQR. The difference, how many times I have remembered, was that the barbarians, manly affected by hardening of the great Fathers of the Church, in that atmosphere of total decadence were converted en masse to Christianity. In Rome today, on who should be the new barbarians conquered, maybe four crazy fennel entwined like polyps to the throne, which after all they are extremely useful, these being the most devoted ruffians, the most interested servants, informers and spies more efficient, and easily managed and manipulated by the ruler, who knows one by one all the rotting corpses that they keep locked in their graves, even well whited, as it were the graves recalled in the Holy Gospels? [cf. Mt 23, 27-32].

.

I am afraid that no one has then analyzed the historical relationship between the psychology of the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller at the history of his native country, which it is Germany. If we think about it, Today the situation of the visible Church is comparable to the defeat of Germany in 1945, Adolf Hitler penned in bunker Berlin with the narrow courtyard of his loyalists, while before the defeat continued to fight, until enlisting teenagers of sixteen. At the same time he continued to deceive the people that soon would be completed and used the Great Secret Weapon. Just like today they are trying to do before the defeat of journalists mainstream from the true Pontificia, not so much defending the indefensible, which can also be understandable and even justifiable on the human and psychological, but denying, even knowing good and even while knowing all the details, how many lives of good and holy priests have been ruined for not having them folded to complicity with evil. And this makes certain journalists mainstream from the true Pontificia of unscrupulous human real criminals, as well as lack of basic Christian sentiments. We know, however, these, the bridge over now viewers patients overflowing river that await the passage of their bodies dragged from the current, when with an ease that even scandalize whores lower level, Immediately after the next conclave will attempt to recycle and to change color like chameleons, but above all as if nothing had happened. They, however, make a right from this moment: do not have to change skin color, They will just change jobs, because at each their minimum sigh, They will be whipped publicly on the face of all the writings with which they have supported the untenable and defended the indefensible. They do not even hesitate to distort facts and information, with a terrible aggravating circumstance on which any Catholic conscience can never be waived: the whole, they did and carried on to the detriment of the victims and the suffering, towards which showed an indifference that is not simply inhuman, because it is satanic. But what is worse is that they have licked ass of the executioners, showing complete indifference to the affected victims and persecuted within the Church, they knew very well, and also in all the smallest details, both stories is the great suffering. And the Devil never lets you back through the window in disguise, after being kicked out the door; and if by chance he asks for forgiveness pretending to be regretted, We should absolutely believe him, because it is the Supreme Principe lies and deception.

.

After the death of Adolf Hitler, Germany was crossed by a wave of suicide; whole families, If suicidarono. The most common phrase that ran between the good Germans - we remember were many - it sounded something like this: "I am ashamed to be German". Phrase that I have already heard several times in private by bishops and priests: "Faced with this situation is no shame to be part of this Church", with this expression implying that the shame is all linked to ecclesial and ecclesiastical structure of this poor visible Church, certainly not to the mystery of the Church the Mystical Body of Christ.

.

As we know, from the Berlin bunker was then passed at the Nuremberg Trials, where the charred corpse of the man who was the Führer, but especially on the ruins of Germany, They were tried and sentenced the main Nazi leaders, many of whom then sentenced to death, vigendo not at the time the New Church of Mercy that seventy years after the Catechism will remove even the most remote possibility of the death penalty and outstanding. Therefore, tomorrow if something similar happens again, we will be merciful makers symbol of millions dead and millions of people and entrust them to social services [cf. our previous articles WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

In the Church it is about to repeat the Nuremberg trials. Tomorrow, sooner or later, on the disastrous debris of destruction, while bishops and priests will say before the world "I am ashamed to belong to this Church", see paraded before the courts an army of cardinals and bishops who attempt to claim ignorance,: "I just obeyed the orders from above!». With the press of the former true Pontificia that, No longer able to recycle, affirm their part: "We just wrote what we have been ordered to write!». Asked judges: "Your Excellency ... ... Eminence Monsignor ... but she realizes that obeying" superior orders "covered those guilty of serious crimes and has hit the innocent, who they were subjected to all kinds of suffering and oppression under your helpless eyes?». And when the day of their judgment, God will ask, "Why did you not defend the Church and the People of God that I have entrusted to you", they will respond: "But I was bound by pontifical secret!».

.

The death of Christ the Lord It renews and time recurs in different ways, in substance but renewing his sacrifice; not by chance, his Glorious Body, after the resurrection lives bringing still imprinted with the passion signs. Therefore today, Christ the Lord, He died on the cross because bishops and cardinals have "obeyed orders over" and in doing so were more a "bound to the pontifical secret".

.

It's just a matter of little time, let this monster gives the last dangerous and deadly blows tail, because soon we will be in the great hall of Nuremberg, to hear repeated by those directly responsible of the Holocaust of the Catholic Church: "I just obeyed the orders from above!». And we, with all due respect to mercy, because of deep and genuine mercy, We will grant them the atoning grace of the scaffold. Because they are death, us that today we are suffering, harassed and persecuted in our house, Instead we are the salvation and future of the pilgrim Church of Christ on earth. And nobody, We will never prevent you from fulfill our mission for Christ, with Christ and in Christ. Why is the Church of Christ, it is not the private property of Peter, that Christ is the Vicar, not the Successor, least of all the corrector of his word. And the power given to Peter is not total and absolute as some would have you believe, rather: It is a very constrained power. The power of Peter is closely tied to the deposit of the Catholic faith, Tradition and doctrine. Peter is not the absolute master of the Church, on the contrary: It is his first and faithful servant, called to guard the truth and to confirm his brothers in faith [cf. LC 22, 31-34]. The mission of Peter, It is not to convene the "democratic" parliament of North Korea. Peter's mission is not to confuse the people of God, using ambiguous and unclear words, because Christ teaches us: "Let what you speak" yes, Yes; no, No "; the more you from evil» [cf. Mt 5, 37].

.

In short: in the Holy Gospels, everything is very clear and no "clever", in two thousand years of history, It never entered ambiguous small footnotes page. Said this, Finally it should be clarified: it is true, no priest, bishop or cardinal is bound to be a hero. But for a priest, a bishop or a cardinal, is certainly not a great human and Christian honor to be a rabbit before the judgment of history, he replies: "But I have only obeyed orders from above ! ».

.

the Island of Patmos, 7 October 2018

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.