The philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Nazism

— Theologica —

PHILOSOPHY AND MARTIN HEIDEGGER Nazism

.

In 1933, the year that Hitler came to power, Martin Heidegger became rector of Freiburg University and assumed the role of official philosopher and most authoritative of the National Socialist Party, whose passport he retained without any repentance to 1945, even as early as 1934 he resigned, But not for a withdrawal from the Nazi doctrine, but because he said, Nazism, in fact he had failed to its essence, and for having given up his radicalism "spiritual".

.

.


PDF print format article

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

I prepare to deal with this sensitive issue philosophy and theology for our page Theologica, They have often echoed in my mind the words of the late Cardinal Giacomo Biffi, which for years he was my bishop when I lived in Bologna and doing my ministry at the Theological Dominican:

.

"We we encounter often in the prophets of nothing, who have nothing to say to man as man, but they say it with great commitment and wealth of means, aggressive announcers of the existential vacuum, which they try to camouflage with the glitter of a purely formal rationality, bearers of a culture of death, attempting to establish themselves as masters of life ' [Exploring design, LDC 1994, p. 308].

.

Some words accompanied by the admonition contained in the Book of Wisdom:

.

The wicked invoke upon himself death with words and deeds; deeming friend, they consume themselves for it and conclude an alliance with it, because they are worthy to belong [1,16].

.

In the large international debate on Martin Heidegger [1889–1976] being from seventy to this part has not been investigated so far and reflected enough on the binding of this philosopher with Nazism. Bond to which Heidegger, as rector of the University of Freiburg, It gave a lot of importance on the theoretical level, talking about a spiritual "national socialism" and praising Adolf Hitler as "the guiding thought".

.

This approach helps us to understand on the one hand what were the intellectual roots and basic impulses of Nazism, on the other, makes us better understand the practical consequences of the metaphysics of Heidegger. In particular, considering what are the practical consequences of Heidegger's metaphysics, we will understand why Heidegger had admiration for the Nazi doctrine.

.

It will then be necessary to recall briefly the existential ontology principles Heidegger, comparing them with the doctrine and the Nazi program, Hitler summed up in his famous work my fight, which however, beyond the historical-political-national program of socialist-statist orientation, He has experienced a profound spiritual and moral backgrounds, rooted in traditional self-consciousness show that the "Christian nobility of the German nation" had matured for centuries, especially starting from the formidable push given to it by Luther, who had the brilliant idea but diabolical, harbinger of immense popularity among the Germans, which is still going, to conceive a German way of being Christian - so far nothing bad -, but from this he developed the poison of the conflict with the Apostolic Roman, in the stubborn conviction of having rediscovered or found the authentic Gospel - in practice a re-edition of Marcion's heresy - proposing himself and imposing himself as a prophet, Doctor and Christian reformer of the German people, But he was able to conquer only partially, why more, until today, It remained a Catholic part of the population that has kept, often between suffering and humiliation, fidelity to Rome and to the previous Catholic tradition, often wrongly accused by Protestants of little patriotic spirit, when in fact it is the German Catholics to keep up the centuries the Christian honor of this great and noble nation.

.

Humiliation suffered like the German Catholics on the occasion of Hitler's rise to power. Indeed, while Catholics, for their loyalty to Rome, They were accused of anti-patriotism, Protestants educated by Hegel, on the basis of Luther, urged to regard the state as the supreme manifestation of God's will, They had no trouble paying the Führer absolute obedience, which, as we know, he came, for many of them, to follow him into a terrible war of aggression in Europe, accompanied by the extermination of the Jewish religion Germans. To this it can be said with certainty that the Hegelian doctrine of the state is one of the theoretical foundations of Nazism.

.

Nihilism HOW THE SOUL OF Nazism

.

The nihilist tendency of ancient Manichaean-Zoroastrian origin, and it is linked to the existence cyclic conception, present in the pagan world, both West and East, for example in India, with the ancient symbol of the swastika. The return to the starting point cancels all the intermediate motion, although it is true that in antiquity, for example in Plato and in Pseudo-Dionysius, the circle is the symbol of spiritual perfection, reflecting on itself.

.

You can not be excluded however, that the coincidence of the end point with the starting point can be understood as the correspondence of the efficient cause with the final cause, which would be a sign of wisdom. But unfortunately, it made the swastika was taken by the Nazis to signify the eternal opposition of life and death, which it is also a principle of esoteric Masonry [no life without death, no death without life].

.

Even the ancient dualist and gnostic conceptions of reality They have a nihilistic aspect, as they consider the matter as a non-being and how bad. From this point of view, Pythagoras and Plato are not without a tinge nihilistic.

.

Nihilism as a negation of God, enters into Christianity Marcion, with his contempt for the God of the Old Testament and in the history of Christianity occasionally reappears, such as with the thirteenth century Cathars. Pessimism Lutheran towards reason and free will is certainly a nihilistic character.

.

German Idealism, which it reduces to be thinking and the object to the subject, certainly it has a nihilistic aspect, in that it denies the external reality or dissolves in the idea, to conclude at the end with atheism, forgetting the fact that it is starting from the things that we know that God exists. But if being is reduced to the ideas of the subject, it is clear that the subject does not come to God, but rather it ends in their own world, God makes of himself and left with absolutely nothing in his hand. It is the sad story of Nietzsche.

.

The interesting thing is that the history of nihilism It goes hand in hand with hatred for Jews, because of being biblical enhancement created and uncreated. Indeed one notices that each nichilista is always an anti-Semite, and it is logical, because no people, like that of the ancient Israelites, It has a sense of reality, whether the material created, whether that divine spiritual.

.

To define nihilism Nietzschean-Nazi collochiamolo in the bigger picture and appropriate nihilism in general. nihilism, indeed, It has many forms. It, in general, is the tendency to denied being, be it material or spiritual, mundane or divine, be your own or others'.

.

nihilism, like every movement of the spirit Practical, It is the practical application of a theory. Let us then first the theoretical basis or gnosiological. It relies on God and human action. The theoretical nihilism is the belief that being there; being is nothing, is worth nothing. Everything is nothing. It is well expressed by the bitter lamentation and dejected of Ecclesiastes: "everything is vanity". This is also the Buddhist nihilism. However, in Qoheleth, the vanity of which he speaks is the vanity of this world. It is always affirmed the existence of God, What it gives meaning to the world he created.

.

The Nazi nihilism appears as a power to be, be expanding, be aggressive, and yet it supposes that framework epistemological. However for it that there is no point. There is originally just nothing. Nothingness is the bottom of all things. Everything is appearance. Everything is subjective, there is nothing objective. Metaphysics is illusion. Nothing is intelligible. Of everything you can be doubted. To affirm and deny the same thing. It is also found in the Greek Sophists and the Skeptics.

.

Diversa form of nihilism is that Hegelian, for which being is contradicted or canceled by nothing. Being coincides with the non-being. The being can not be without non-being. Being is, and at the same time it is not. everything becomes, everything passes and everything returns.

.

Another form is nihilism Leopardi: It is located itself from nothing, all things come from nothing and return to nothing. The more comes from less and less to the back. Everything is absurd, at random, without meaning or reason. There is nothing for which it is worth living. This is a pessimistic nihilism; Instead the Nazis is optimistic. It is a hymn to life, but it ends with the tragic death, It is a "being-towards-death".

.

Nihilism theological. For the Nazi God is man's expansion as will to power. God is not in the Nazi as a You who is the ego, but as an original force, intima, profound and fundamental ego. The Nazis did not simply deny the existence of the Christian God creator, but actively suppresses, kills him, cancels, as taught by Nietzsche.

.

Note the difference nihilism Hegelian. For him, God is the identity of being and non-being. He is therefore nothing and be at once. The world is not something, but it's nothing. God is everything and nothing. So God does not create, that does not take the world out of nothing. But the world belongs to the essence of God, which it is to be and not be at a time, true and false, good and bad. God negates itself as well as the not-be denies being. God can not exist without the world. As the being is identified with non-being, so God is identified with the world.

.

The practical nihilism is a form of contempt or hatred of reality, who appears hateful and bad. Hence the desire or attempt to cancel it as an enemy, to replace it with his own will, with their own ideas or a fictional world invented by us.

.

L '' death instinct ', of which Freud speaks, l ' "being-towards-death" [his death] by Heidegger, the rise at the expense of others, the argumentative or quarrelsome, the spirit of contradiction [1], the violence, the spirit of oppression - like the "will to power" [Will to power] by Nietzsche - the will to dominate, the murderous desire, Promethean spirit, the will of God undo, are forms of nihilism. The Nietzschean nihilism and Nazi so has the character of an aggressive nihilism, for which being is evil and must be destroyed. It is the hatred or contempt for reality, to be so for the true and the good. It's destructive will, Will death, to cancel, to destroy, to kill. This is the most severe form, that borders on insanity, as it has happened to Nietzsche, according to its well-known formulas: "The truth is a lie"; "We must trasvalutare all values".

.

It is clear that no nihilist seriously believes that being does not exist or is it a dream or is contradictory, because it is such an absurdity, which it is not even thinkable. There is but the Heraclitean-Hegelian reduction being to become. And it is at the bottom of Heidegger's idea of ​​being, except that it tends to nihilism with his belief that being "appear" out of nowhere.

.

But also the idea of ​​an absolute becoming You can be expressed in words, but you can not really think. The right idea of ​​becoming is only that of Aristotle, as a passage from potency to act. But here we are always being on the floor and there is no contradiction.

.

THE BIRTH AND THE END OF THE TRAGEDY

.

The Nazi enterprise was designed and built under the sign of a tragic conception of life and in particular hero, fighting for a hopeless cause, knowing in advance that will be defeated and yet it throws in the war. It is inspired by the Nietzschean conception of life and the superman, whose principles are already present in the work youth The Birth of Tragedy, scholarly work of philologist and expert on Greek literature, where even then it appears Nietzschean theory of the spring of the Apollonian serenity, which represents the rationality, from an original fund of darkness, chaotic and unbridled, the Dionysian, that is the self-understanding of the ego.

.

In further production Nietzschean, with Behold the man, It appears the myth of Fate, fate [skill], that will have great importance in Heidegger and Nazism. At the same time processes the famous Nietzsche's superman theory and the will to power, from which man's perspective on the one hand is intended to death, while the other wants to endlessly their own power and self-affirmation, whereby, on one hand likes Fate [love Fati], the other he feels himself as Doom instead of God, he suppresses [death of God] to assert himself. Zarathustra in Thus spake Zarathustra And the superman model, that rises to the heights of truth and thence compassionately among men to teach them to rise to where he came down, waves become aware of their infinite power, that at the same time is running toward death, in an eternal cycle of life-death and death-life.

.

My thesis is that the great tragedy of the modern age begins Luther and ends with Hitler. But today the virus capable of throwing us again into this tragedy - the "throwness” [thrownness or "alluvial", as he calls Heidegger] - it is still alive, and is the theology of Rahner, who, for its explicit declaration, in the last years of his life, Heidegger said that was "his only teacher".

.

In 1933, the year that Hitler came to power, Heidegger became rector of Freiburg University and assumed the role of official philosopher and most authoritative of the National Socialist Party, whose passport he retained without any repentance to 1945, even as early as 1934 he resigned, But not for a withdrawal from the Nazi doctrine, but because he said, Nazism, in fact he had failed to its essence, and for having given up his radicalism "spiritual".

.

The concept that Heidegger He had become the ideal Nazi was taken from Nietzsche, who, although it did arise the spirit from the body, However it presaged and advocated a progeny of lords and masters emerging on the mass of the weak and not lemmings biobased, how it will be later in the racist Nazi, but for the strength of will, for which, as already said Hegel, "The will wills itself».

.

Another ingredient of the ideal Nazi It was the idea of ​​humanizing mission, liberating and salvific the German people, as God's chosen people among all peoples to teach the world the true concept of God and the divine freedom.

.

Hence the belief descended that it was up to Germany, by divine right, dominion over all peoples: Deutschland üabout Everything, through the war of conquest, on the biblical model of how Israel, divinely, He conquered the promised land driving out from it or taking prisoner the people that was there.

.

Hence the Nazi anti-Semitism: considering themselves Germanic people divinely elected, he could not tolerate another chosen people beside him, such as that of the Israelites. The idea was a materialization racist idea of ​​liberating mission-dominatrix, of spiritual. In this sense Heidegger refused to accept such popularization, for which his eyes Nazism leaked so his spiritual elevation.

.

LUTHER AND THE MISSION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE

.

Basically the idea was already launched at the time by Luther with his pamphlet To the Christian nobility of the German nation on the improvement of their Christian status [To the Christian Nobility of the German nation on the amendment of the Christian societies]. With Luther, the German people was discovered, against Roma falsifying Pharisee of the Gospel and against the Jews the terrible God of the Old Testament, the true preacher of the Gospel of God's mercy for all, without work and without merit, that the German soldiery Lutheran lay the people of Rome with the sack 1527.

.

With this bellicose exaltation and irrational Luther of the German people took revenge, first, against that pagan imperial Rome, which in ancient times had tried to subdue him; then, against the Rome of the Popes, who had exploited and humiliated him.

.

Luther, with his inner God, irrational and fatal, It is well placed, with a violent polemic against papal Rome, in the wake of a previous spiritual tradition appeared in the fourteenth century with Meister Eckhart, who, without falling in the excesses of Luther's anti-Roman, but nevertheless undermining the full doctrinal communion with Rome [2], inaugurating a specifically German way of making theology, based on category Gemüth, that is, as a pre-rational and mystical “feeling”. [3]. The term Gemüth is very difficult to translate, because it represents a complex of psychic factors per se distinguished from each other, but that all together are expressed in Gemüth. It could be likened to the Biblical term "heart". It involves refinement of inner eye, of taste and discernment, depth of intuition, moral wisdom, purity of conscience, strength of conviction. But Luther, breaking with Rome, He has misled the German people from its true mission of the civilization and the Church, mission had already made light in previous centuries with his holy, such as San Bonifacio, San Bruno, Saint Hildegard, Santa Gertrude, St. Albert the Great and the Rhenish mystics. Instead Luther exalted his people in a wrong way, injected in him the pride of the virus, who, over the following centuries, due to a shift away from truth and Christian faith, She led him to the madness of Nazism and the catastrophe of World War II.

.

There remains so for centuries the belief Germans to be God's chosen people, that goes hand in hand with the conviction of owning their own powerful and revolutionary theology, expression of intuitive genius and German warrior, contrary and higher than the rational and moderate Latin or Greek, considered weak or decaying. And this conviction to be healthy people, strong and elected goes hand in hand through the centuries, up to Nazism and at the same Karl Rahner, with the conviction of the primacy of philosophy and German theology of all other philosophies and theologies of humanity.

.

So in the fifteenth century it appears the German Theology, self-incensing of Germany and its theology, by an unknown author, Theology of the dark and the depths of the ineffable mystic momentum, work which Luther oversaw the publication. That, with its tendency immanentist, certainly contributes to the constitution and to the fame of Luther's theology.

.

The famous thesis Cusanian from the coincidence of opposites in God it has been exploited by idealists, probably bad interpreting the thought of the good Cusano, to endorse their absurd contradiction of God, the yes and no.

.

The German Lutherans noticed than they could use in their favor the cogito Cartesian since its first rising, although it was invented by a Catholic: see for example Leibniz. In fact, the Cartesian ego, beyond its apparent rationality, It goes well with the self Lutheran. Just ask the immediate inner object of self Cartesian God's Word, as did Luther, instead Cartesian innate idea, And that's it. It is true that Luther was essentially a realist of the biblical realism. But his was a interiorista realism, of type Augustine, wary of the experience of sense, so the transition was not difficult to idealism.

.

He took this step the Kantian epistemology and since then, up to Nietzsche and Heidegger, the subject or I became master of being, in defiance of Luther, knew that while preserve the Catholic biblical realism, This same St. Thomas Aquinas and William of Ockham, who was master of Luther. In fact, for Aquinas and Ockham, as the Bible teaches, being is not product or ego expansion, but it is created by God.

.

In the seventeenth century now appears Jakob Böhme, twisted and paradoxical philosopher of Abyss, unfathomable abyss and cruelly merciful God, origin of heaven and hell, of good of evil. bohemian, brilliant visionary and daring, by overactive imagination, ignorant of scholastic philosophy, but so much the better, It will be considered for excellence from the Tedeschi philosopher teutons, and prepare the idealism of the nineteenth century rise, especially with Fichte, Hegel, Holderlin and Schleiermacher, where Gemüth becomes the Gehfühl, sentiment of the Absolute. The Gemüth It is also present in Kant, He also speaks of the abyss or "abyss of reason" [the precipice of the reason] [4].

.

Even the jew Spinoza, although jew, It is co-opted by idealists, especially by Hegel, as "the one from which we must begin to make philosophy". The fact that Spinoza was rightly expelled from the synagogue as wicked after being hit by cherem [from Hebrew boycott, excommunication] It was for the idealists a title in more than glory, confirming them in their anti-Semitism.

.

Hegel and Schelling see on Giordano Bruno, Prince occult magical Renaissance, an inspiring and precursor of idealistic pantheism, with particular reference to the opposition of being with non-being, that, according to the Nolan, It would be a magical power source. Hegel draws inspiration from there for his dialectic and the "power of the negative". Bruno, although not German, It is adopted by idealists as a new element to the "German philosophy".

.

The Gemüth reappears as the background of consciousness in Husserl, master at a time of Heidegger and Edith Stein. It is paradigmatic for the German culture and the history of European civilization and of the Church, the story of the relationship between these three great figures of German philosophy. Edmund Husserl e la Edith Stein, Jews, Martin Heidegger, anti-Semitic.

.

Husserl, early in his philosophical research, provoker was of great expectations in many spirits who long to know the truth, disappointed and dissatisfied relativist historicism, from petty positivism and flat Psychologism era. She also felt the need to return to epistemological realism, spoiled Hegelian idealism. So it was that Husserl launched the popular program: «let's get back to the things themselves!».

.

And to implement this program, for which it would be enough to go back to St. Thomas Aquinas, as a few years before Leo XIII she had invited him to do, Husserl conceived a very ambitious plan, which is to actually establish a new science, the "phenomenology", which finally, after the crisis of European Sciences, He would ensure definitely the way to humanity, the principles and contents of «philosophy as science».

.

At first Husserl spoke of a wfood show, intuition or experience of being as objective essence, It looks like 'phenomenon', matter of fact, immediate manifestation or revelation and some of the universal truth, spiritual and logical consciousness.

.

So far Heidegger and Husserl followed Stein. But later, both the first and the second began to take the distances. Heidegger, sensitive on one side to the issue of the concrete existing subject and the other being the thematic cha appears in Presocratic, He started his existential ontology, while Stein, after Husserl, failing to promises, Descartes wanted to re-evaluate and then embraced the idealism, He discovered the Thomistic realism and welcomed him, much to write an opera metaphysics "Finite Being and eternal being ' [be his finite and eternal] with which brought to light the fact that man, starting from the knowledge of things, in its finitude he is in front of the eternal Being, i.e. God, so it was to refute subjectivism self both Husserl and Heidegger, closed both to the objective reality of being, and then ego encounter with God: Husserl, the fact that for him to be, devoid of its independence from the consciousness, it was reduced to being a mere "correlated" or "phenomenon" of consciousness; Heidegger, because it had to be reduced to finiteness and temporality of the fragile sinner and deadly.

.

The comparison between the outcome of Heidgger's existential journey is interesting and that of Stein. This would have died a martyr at Auschwitz in 1942. Heidegger, Instead of the perfect actor who had always been, it was to the end and, because despite the bad impression he had made with Nazism, He keeps talking about him, He heard again, with incredible mystifying skills, gather around him the attention of both atheists and naive believers.

.

Like this, after the ignominious end of his revered Führer, He had the nerve to show up in the shameful 1946, with its famous Letter on Humanism, his, the theorist of «being-towards-death», like the lawyer of human dignity, "Shepherd of being ', refusing with sliced ​​chaste virgin outrage the winking and vulgar proposal of his worthy appears Sartre, atheistic existentialist, to join his "existentialism", because he, these Heidegger, was "being philosopher", concluding in the famous phrase: "now only a god can save us", but that really is not the Christian God, but the ”sacred” of Hölderlin and therefore, all over again, the god of the Nazis.

 

FURTHER EVENTS OF GEMBEATH

.

The Gemüth she finds himself in Heidegger and with Nazism. It is certainly close to Gefühl of Scleiermacher and is subtended to Geist Hegelian. Side, in the same Critique of Pure Reason, use this term; but the Italian translator, not knowing how to make it, uses the term "spirit".

.

The Gemüth It is also closely connected to 'Experience, as a spiritual or inner experience, in Hegel, Heidegger e Rahner: one with an emotional connotation moral act; while this is an act purely gnoseologic. The recurring motif of the Gemüth And the belief that the conceptual reason is not the primary function and profound epistemological man, but that this primary function lies in-prioricamente, more in depth, previously and pre-categorially in spirit or in the consciousness. For this dark ego likeness unintelligible and-priorico with self-consciousness Cartesian, Descartes, although Catholic, but actually self-centered, find much success in the rise of egocentricity German idealist, until you get to the ego absolute ego Fichte and Nietzsche, He says on the ashes of the God who killed.

.

The German theology, in its troubled history, constantly oscillating between two opposing tendencies, among which never finds peace: that gnostic Dio gnostos, cognizable, rational, understandable, and conceptualization, which finds its highest expression in the God-concept Hegel, where the mystery is revealed; and the agnostic of God agnoston, Pagan misteriosofia, incognizable, irrational, unintelligible, Non-conceptualize, absolute and impenetrable mystery.

.

This God is in Heidegger [the “sacred”] e in Rahner. It is not the true God, but rather "a" god, or "the" god, which suggests a polytheistic background. Is this the God of Hölderlin, Heidegger and Nazism, not devoid of references to the ancient Germanic mythology.

.

German theologians have always It made a huge effort to understand and respond to the analog-participatory notion, which it is the guarantee to access an authentic notion of God, which is biblical, that avoids both Gnosticism polytheistic that agnosticism false mysticism. It is the Pauline notion of God, for which God is knowable, but incomprehensible; He can speak with truth and by analogy, ma, to experience mystique summit, it is better to remain silent.

.

The German feels the need of the mystical, Of feel God with him, and is a great desire; he knows that God is in the depths of consciousness, more inward than my innermost, but it lacks policy, of humility and immerse sobriety in these abyssal depths and unsearchable, so you lose recklessly darkness, but nevertheless it claims to prophesy or prophesy, when in fact pronounced with oracular air gibberish, that naive listen avidly and are the subject of endless discussions and interpretations, never get away from a spider hole.

.

It 'amazing, but also disgusting, to about, cunning with which Heidegger, after the defeat of the Nazis in which he had played a leading role, without giving any sign of repentance, He managed to rebuild the image, for many years vanished behind the exaltation of Nietzsche, of the profound inquirer of being [5], so as not to disdain to speak of God "Savior of mankind" and of man "shepherd of being" and "being home", except to maintain a friendly contempt for Christian theology, which he haughtily calls "ontotheology", vulgar and coarse, whereas yes, his God was the "divine God". And this would be the one who Rahner called "his one true teacher".

.

HEIDEGGER AND Nietzsche

.

Nietzsche does not spare criticism of the German people, but always on the assumption it assumes that it is a "race of lords', in which he serves as a superhuman guidance of the new humanity without God, his vate and Führer philosophical, as Hitler will be the political Führer. The ambitions of Heidegger will not be different. Heidegger claimed to have discovered once and for all, after the first flashes of Anassimandro, Heraclitus and Parmenides, the sense or the truth, after that since then, before him, It was the "error history", Christianity included. And in a written note in 1933, refers to Hitler, that, according to him, «has awakened a new reality that puts our thinking on the right track and gives it shock force» [6].

.

The first contact with metaphysics Heidegger him in his early essay of 1916 The categories and important teaching of Duns Scotus, where he meets the uniqueness of being Scotistic, as well as the intuitionism and voluntarism of the great Franciscan theologian. These basic orientations will always remain in Heidegger, even when he, in contact with the metaphysical Parmenides and Heraclitus, lose the light of the Catholic faith, in which he was raised, so as to have had the thought, quickly abandoned, to become a Jesuit. He succeeds in fact in his mind the presumption, which from now on will not abandon mostly, typical of idealistic gnosticismo, to have achieved a degree of speculative intelligence greater than that offered by Biblical realism epistemological and Catholic theology.

.

The metaphysical interest remains, but they seem to act at the same time the Lutheran influences, like that of the’ "Anguish" [Angst], of alluvial [thrownness], of concern [worry], of guilt [fault], of concentration on the ego as an existential concreteness [To be there].

.

The loss of faith however due to Heidegger's absolutization of metaphysics at the expense of theology. Metaphysics no longer leads to God, but it folds in on itself and about man, on To be there. It is the awareness that transcends the body be [the "ontological difference"]; but this "being" [be] is not the ' to be very, It is not One Who Is [Is 3,14].

.

For Heidegger, being is not the entity act, but the entity denial. Meeting the thought of Nietzsche, they, in his monumental work 900 pages on Nietzsche, It developed during a decade [1930-1940] in full the rise of Nazism, It comes to conceive of being, its accompanying, as an irrepressible impulse, as absolute will to irrational act of war.

.

The truth, on the basis of Nietzsche, adequacy entity is not already, but revelation or appearance of the entity willed by the subject. The truth is not the principle but the effect will. It is not true that exists, but what I want there. The truth coincides with freedom. The same concept reappears in Heidegger, and it is found in Rahner.

.

Being, as in Duns Scotus, It is not analog or diversified, but unique. It is autocomprensione. It is not hierarchical, but horizontal. Transcendence is not a climb, but an extension, an exit by itself, a ' "ecstasy". The institution does not conceptualize, but it appears; and precomprende [preamplifierännis] and is experienced. As in Duns Scotus, It is is not connected to the intellect, but at will. not the abstract, but the concrete. No universal, but the individual. The real is the good. From here it will be out Heidegger the idea of ​​truth as freedom, it will reappear on Rahner.

.

Being, the sense or the truth per Heidegger, it is possible, be able to do, trend, want, Act, become, finiteness, presence, time, event, vita, freedom, history. The being is not nothing before, but it emerges from nothing. The being is the thought, the experience, the hidden. Even non-being, evil and false come in being. Becoming is better being. I am in the totality [To be there]. The human being is the agent in the world.

.

To change, become, change is better than store. Man is a "historical" being. Being is "event" [Event]. The will is always on the move, without fixed destination; establishes the law and decide on good and evil. No law in the situation; but the situation creates the law. Therein lies the freedom. "I want" instead of "you must". Destroy and create. "freedom for nothing in the freely willed necessity of an eternal return" [7]. Thought is rammemorante [souvenir] because thinking is to find the original, what was lost. The future return of the past. There is no progress, but a circularity.

.

When everything becomes, nothing becomes. In ethics Heidegger, as in that of Nietzsche, there is no passage or progress from death to life, from least to most, but an eternal, esperante and hopeless conflict between life and death. As in the myth of Prometheus, the god's liver regrows and is increasingly consumed by Raven, or the Sisyphean task, he must always start over after reaching the top.

.

amor Fati, according to the Nietzschean perspective. And Plato: "All that is great is in the storm" [8]. Emerging on the other is better than serving others. Violence is a sign of strength. The strong raises no weak, but dominates. Hate is the weapon of victory. The winner is always right. The loser is always wrong. The fact coincides with the right and with good.

.

Nazi Germany He became convinced that the German people had from God [God with us] the sacred mission of establishing in Europe, under the guidance of the Führer, by the use of force and a lightning war of conquest [flash war], a new "millennial" political-spiritual revolutionary order [III Reich] «socialist» ["National Socialist"], involving the elimination of the Jewish people, as it was considered the maximum representative of the religion of the transcendent God slave, from which he had originated Christianity.

.

Anti-Semitism, before being hatred for the Jewish people, It is hatred for their sacred text, ie the Old Testament, and then for God's transcendent creator and legislator, who punishes sin and requires repair by a sacrifice. As with the heresy of Marcion, the Germans with Luther rejected this God to replace it with the God of Christ. Except that the hostile conception of the Old Testament God turned against the Christian God falsandolo. In fact happened with Luther that, always in the line of Marcion, He claimed to enhance the mercy of the Christian God, remedial works are no longer needed, so that the moral law is relativized and made optional, Christian freedom became a pretext for the license and the life of grace began to be taken in a pantheistic sense, while the human dignity exalted by Christ began to be so inflated, which eventually ended in atheism. The first result was that of Hegel; the second was to Nietzsche.

.

National Socialism THE ENTERPRISE

.

The Nazis believed of having completed the Lutheran Reformation liberation of consciousness, which through Hegel reaches Nietzsche [9]. Heidegger was the greatest interpreter of this spiritual evolution, why was the philosopher who gave the National Socialist culture of its theoretical basis. The theological basis of Nazism is the Nazi's belief that he has God with him. This belief develops Hegelian idealism pantheistic with the doctrine of the state deities. As for ethics, Nazism assumes the Nietzschean conception of the will to power. Based on Nietzsche, Heidegger to Nazism instead provides the conception of man and his destiny as self-understanding in athematic emotional situation and pre-historical understanding of itself as there, project and decision of its existence the creator and ruler of the world as being-towards-death. Hence the great army of the Nazi invasion of Europe project in order to occupy what Hitler called "living space" of the German people, which she belonged to him by right, so he was allowed to occupy it by force. This program was also my fight.

.

To achieve this end Hitler Nietzsche applied the lesson gradually increase aggression without a clear deadline, but in an indefinite and insatiable, up to the limit of his strength, ie until the final collapse. And so indeed it happened. A tragic path toward death through the exercise of will power. Does not it came to conquer a domain in Europe, it was expected and encouraged or welcomed by the European. Yet the principle Nietzsche was just what the "race of lords', exponent of the superman, by fate he had the mission to subjugate the peoples decadent, still enmeshed in bourgeois ideals of democracy and equality, short of '' inauthentic existence ", how to tell Heidegger, if not exactly into the trap of religion, morality and spirituality. So the firm's basic Hitler there was the doctrine of the Nietzschean will to power, Heidegger interpreted as a Nietzsche as the essence of the German man - the "blonde beast", as he called Nietzsche -, destined to rule over the world and jointly as the totality [be] self-designing [design] and "thrown" [thrownness], the "cure" [worry] and in guilt [fault], Emerging from nowhere [Not] and straining toward death.

.

As Germany during Nazism was risen to the level of a major world power with its culture, its industry, his technique, its economy, its social organization and its armed forces, as well as with its colonies and the alliance of Italy and Japan, that he had been able to attract to himself, and not lack sympathy for Hitler in various European environments, However the war effort of the conquest of Europe from France, to England, Scandinavia, to Russia, of the Balkans, to North Africa, associated, moreover, the elimination of the Jews, He could not not look at every healthy mind madness. Because of this, must say that, if Heidegger put this enterprise, this can be explained - and it could not be otherwise - than with the principles themselves, fundamentally nihilistic and atheistic its metaphysics, especially of the central phase, that said support for the superomismo atheistic and nihilistic Nietzschean. I believe that the same Nazis, Heidegger and Hitler included, already they knew at the beginning that it would end badly.

.

So why undertake it? Here we enter the heart of atheism and nihilistic say SIC et simpliciter of nihilism, Why, as we have seen, Atheism is every nihilism. However, we must remember that the nihilist denies being so good is not absolutely, since, as we have seen, this is impossible. Beyond the flamboyant expressions, they do impress fools ["everything is nothing", "Being is not being", "everything is vanity", etc. ..], the so-called nihilist is actually nothing more than a vulgar and miserable little man desperately clinging to itself, is none other than the son of Adam sinner, well attached to the goods of this world. Certainly it is moved by a deadly and destructive spirit, that is the very essence of sin. In fact, the ideological climate dell'heideggerismo, the nietzschianismo and Nazism are those at the bottom of the tragedy, described by the same Nietzsche, whose words have remained famous'The tragedy begins», signifying that it was about to enter a tragedy. It would be the tragedy of the First and then the Second World War. But the tragedy of the virus is not completely eradicated. It remains dormant in the folds of history even today. And it would not take much to wake it up..

.

TRAGEDY CAN START AGAIN

.

The thought of Heidegger He was later hired by Rahner, as basic inspiration, during his theological training in the twenties of the twentieth century, during which he eagerly followed the lectures Heidegger. So Rahner, at the end of his life, after trying to make Thomas, in the years 1939-1941, an idealist, precisely he stated openly that Heidegger was the '' only his teacher '.

.

And indeed, Rahner although he never specifically mention, it is not difficult to see Heidegger's influence in theology, in metaphysics, in epistemology, anthropology and ethics Rahner. In theology, the unintelligibility and ineffability of the divine mystery of theology Rahner, closely resembles the "nothing" Heidegger, from which it appears to be, nothing that is not simply non-being, but belongs horizon impenetrable and ineffable being hidden.

.

In metaphysics, being as self Rahner, caught a priori as transcendental horizon of categorical understanding, It is certainly being Heidegger's self-understanding of man in the world, a-priori condition of the possibility of knowledge and experience of the world. In epistemology pre-understanding [Anticipation] athematic Rahner being corresponds to preamplifierännis by Heidegger. The theming or conceptualization is the later and derivative, of an empirical nature, original essence of self or identity transcendental experience with being, in which being coincides with thinking. In this way God no longer distinguished from the ego and from God, because the one and the other uniquely represent the horizon of, in which the be, albeit it finished as a human being, It coincides with becoming and with the will as a divine being.

.

Rahner speaks of God but, as do Heidegger. But we might ask who God is and if it is the true God, Being subsisting, immutable and impassible, knowable “by analogy” [Sap 13,5] e «through what has been made» [RM 1,20], creator of heaven and earth, distinct from the world, that the God of Jesus Christ? It would seem, because the attributes, the way and manner in which God is known stand in stark contrast to the true God. Il Dio in Rahner, man summit, a-thematically, immediately and originally experienced, unintelligible and unmentionable mystery, It is more like Nietzsche's superman to the true God of reason and faith.

.

The ethical issue, in Rahner it appears as "spirit world". The man appears to be [To be there] of being, so how historicity and self horizon as the transcendence. As spirit, man is freedom which does not act on the basis of a moral law dictated by a human nature fixed and defined; but the acting subject freely determines his own being destined for death. Human action, per Rahner, It is not governed by objective moral laws, universal and immutable. Since the action is in the concrete and the changeability and variety of circumstances, It is going to every single person, concrete subject, conscientiously decide what to do. The single person, so, according to Rahner, It has a duty, the right and responsibility to add, to his will, changing it, to the ineffective abstractness of the moral law, that element of concreteness, which makes it operational, but for this same changing.

.

It may so happen, according to Rahner, that a divine command, for instance, like that of mercy, failing in its abstractness a character of absoluteness, may be replaced, in certain cases, in the name of "freedom", from the practice of violence. Thus Rahner, with a perfectly Nietzschean style, with these disconcerting words, It is actually to justify violence: «The realization of freedom ... is already a restriction of the scope of the freedom of another and of its essence and this inevitably. No one can act freely, without thereby using 'violence' and exerting physical force on the other» [10].

.

In fact Rahner even get to talk a "transcendental violence needs', which, 'Condition of possibility of creaturely freedom, it must also be recognized as a natural theologically, willed by God and inherently non-sinful" [11].

.

As for the meaning Christian Death, Rahner, who does not believe the immortality of the soul, but he believes that with death the whole man dies, not even conceive of a life after death, but according to him eternal life is the death itself, as "personal self-fulfillment" and as the moment in which man reaches his "fulfillment" and "freedom reaches its own definitiveness" [12]. It's the same idea of ​​Heidegger the human being as "being-towards-death". It is the same Nietzschean and Nazi idea of ​​death as a heroic act of free will in wanting what Destiny wants [skill] which is a command of the Führer.

.

The tragedy of the virus therefore they are not dead, but only sleeping. De facto, as noted by Pope Francis, It has already started the third world war, which, moreover, does not destroy the bodies, as the other two, He destroys souls with mortal sin. Not triumphs physical death, but that inner, under the appearance of life. Rages inner tragedy under the guise of peace and normality.

.

What we should meditate deeply is how it was possible that a great people like the German people, so rich in human and spiritual qualities, so ancient Christian traditions and civilians, He was able to be seduced and carried away by a crazy madman like Hitler in a criminal enterprise absolutely crazy to want to subject the world to Germany, together with project sacrilegious to suppress the People Messianic and Priests, from which he was born the Savior of mankind.

.

That what's this, such ideas, such interests, such impulses, what purposes, what mistakes, such illusions, such pretexts, such bad examples, such bad teachers, which will led him to so much? You should answer these questions, and we will see that viruses that have poisoned is not dead.

.

Today it is rumored that Hell God does not exist and does not punish, actually Hell, and the rage of Satan we are experiencing them within the Church. Today that the "primacy of conscience" is proclaimed, we are more than ever tormented by conscience. Today, in full rhetorical dialogistica, We are fiercely closed to those who do not think like us. Today we imagine ourselves to be caressed by a God "compassion" we invented, because we want to have permission to sin without being punished. Never like today souls, which according to Rahner would be all in favor, They were actually so devoid of grace. From what we understand? From ignorance guilty. Never in fact, as today we have had access to so many means and so effective to instruct us in faith. Yet never before has it has come time to deny or to ignore the very foundations of existence, knowledge and life, and they have pullulato many heresies among theologians themselves, bishops and cardinals.

.

Germans, who failed to conquer Europe and the world with weapons, they did not abandon the intention to take over the world. But now try to conquer subjecting it to Luther and his followers, until Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche and Heidegger. Rahner is the Trojan horse by which Luther should subjugate the Church and the world to Germany. The obstacle to this is certainly the papacy. Against him now focus all the powers of evil. You notice that the Roman Pontiff today warns shots, sometimes falters, it seems to collapse, He feels the seduction, He is surrounded by children of the Devil. It should rally around him, urge the supervision and help in the tremendous struggle against Satan.

.

Varazze, 6 May 2018

.

NOTE

[1] K. Löwith in cit, op.ct., p.294.

[2] Cf A.Colombo, op.cit., p.65. A phrase probably exploited.

[3] Cf K.Löwith, As Hegel a Nietzsche. The revolutionary break of the century. Nineteenth, Einaudi Editions, 1993.

[4] spirituality Essays, Pauline Editions 1969, p.308.

[5] Ibid., p.309.

[6] Rahner's passages can be found in mine Karl Rahner. The Second betrayed, Editions Faith&Culture, Verona 2009, pp.134-144.

[7] cf. the Heracliteus polemos pater panton.

[8] See his propositions condemned by Pope John XXII in 1329 (Denz.950-980).

[9] Cf G.Faggin, Meister Eckhart and pre-Protestant German mystic, Brothers Publishers Mouth, Milan 1946, pp 192-194; 208; 296; 298ss.

[10] Critique of pure reason, The third, Bari 1965, p.491.

[11] See her famous Letter on Humanism the 1946.

[12] Cit. the A.Colombo, Bloodhounds. From the wrong side of history, Lindau Editions, Torino 2017, p.65.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

The German episcopate and Eucharistic intercommunion with Protestants. Peter washes his hands like Pilate: "Find a unanimous solution among you"

— Theologica —

The EPISCOPATE German and intercommunion MASS WITH PROTESTANT. PETER WASHES HANDS AS PILATO: "FIND A SOLUTION BETWEEN YOU UNANIMOUS"

.

If the Bishops of Germany, unanimously they were to agree to give Holy Communion to Protestants, what will happen tomorrow, if another episcopal conference, unanimously, decide to unite in marriage same-sex couples? What will happen if another, unanimously, decide that it is permissible to abort the fetus of a baby found suffering from malformation, not considering it right to give birth to a creature affected by imperfections? What will happen if another, unanimously, It decides that it is an act of charity to end the life of a terminally ill and suffering that has no life expectancy? Since when, unanimity, It is a guarantee of sound doctrine and profound respect to revealed truth?

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

Contrary to those who for years are stealing the reviews on the subject contained in the articles of Fathers of The Island of Patmos looking from mentioning the Authors, doing then pass certain analysis as their own, we have proven Christian intellectual honesty and always mention when we appeal to any past or present author, well it was a minimum sigh. This is the reason why our writings published on the page Actuality abound with numerous citations in brackets, those on the page Theologica notes at the page bottom or between the lines of text.

.

This introductory preamble just to sing two anthems: the first, to tenants who after the harvest they look from saying where they harvest the grapes. The second, to excuse me if I quote below the expression of an author that at the time I just can not remember the name, this thing that prevents me from giving the legitimate paternity to a phrase not mine, which is as follows: "The Supreme Pontiffs have placed the tiara, the laity and theologians have worn '.

.

When you feel discomfort, or subjective discomfort human, we must keep it, to limit talk privately with those who can possibly help. This not only because the emotion is not to be publicized, but because it is not appropriate or prudent to do so, less still it is to download their any inconvenience on others, in a very special way when - like the writer of these lines -, He has called for the sacrament of grace and mission to be guides and teachers, not sowers of confusion. But when the discomfort is objective, because based on public facts, often painful or even dangerous, in that case, manifest discomfort, It can be an imperative following awareness obligation to explain what is right and what wrong, if anything, even preaching to that slice of the People of God made slothful by bad shepherds to feel discomfort and pain before certain grave problems affecting society and the Church. All this with all due respect to those who try to eliminate certain problems at the root saying: "Nobody has the truth in your pocket". Phrase that said and then read in a certain way consequently leads to say that at the bottom, the truth, it is questionable, but above all relative. If anything, it is true that no one owns the truth, of which we are called to be faithful servants and announcers, or as St. Thomas Aquinas: "You're not you who possess the truth, but it is the truth that has you " [cf. Of the truth]. For this reason, wriggling from certain discussions or answers with ambiguous phrase "No one has the truth in your pocket", statement is false and dangerous in itself, place the Church, which is a, santa, catholic and apostolic, the truth is the trustee and custodian, so that, far from having in his pocket, have it still in custody by the will and divine mandate. And we, that we are certainly not its masters, But we are his faithful servants, guardians and announcers. So, who announced this truth and defends it from error, It is not acting in this way because with style Pelagian O legalistic He believed to have in your pocket, but precisely because it must serve, defend it and proclaim it. No one who is true guardian and herald of truth may omit to specify and order the error, why in the world, with the truth, there is also the anti-truth that wants to impose on the truth, often so violent and destructive, but mostly untrue.

.

THOSE IN QUESTION AND LAY unconscious EVERYTHING REDUCED FOR A CLASH OF THE PARTY AND THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF progressives

.

The ongoing controversy unleashed these days the German Episcopate on giving Holy Communion to Protestants, It is a delicacy beyond any ordinary, because once again, these indomitable and irreconcilable barbarians, touch on beyond Rome and above Roma heart engine that drives the whole Mystical Body which is the Church: the Most Holy Eucharist. And before this problem, all of the theological and ecclesiological, as well as canonical and disciplinary, i laiconi floundering between an online journal and between a blog and the other, They are reducing their style as the whole issue to a political conflict.

.

Aware of speaking to that effect to the deaf, I repeat that certain major issues are theological and doctrinal, then face them with the typical spirit of the political tussle, eventually reducing everything to a struggle between the so-called party of the conservatives and the progressives, It can only encourage the de-consecration of the sacramental signs and reduce the Church of Christ to a battlefield on which collide animated subjective moods at the base by pure ideology, not rarely even by personal problems of certain people who would need a good spiritual director, of a good confessor, but sometimes certain of a good psychiatrist.

.

This inevitably leads to some lay people who stood on his head the tiara placed by the Supreme Pontiffs, to cause further damage to the Church and to the People of God, never as lost and confused today.

.

GREAT DECEPTION THAT ALL PLAYED BY PARA-COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL ON POST-A LANGUAGE NOT JUST HAPPY ADOPTED BY THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL

.

briefly summarize the overrun problem German then proceed with the analysis of the fact: The German Bishops' Conference discussed the possibility of giving Holy Communion to married Protestants with Catholics, adopting in this sense, the technique of the so-called "sliced ​​salami". Indeed, each time in the Church were granted limited special pardons and as many limited permissions to experiment, these concessions were then adopted practices, almost always it spreads beyond all limits of what had been granted. A concrete example of the many that serve as a paradigm? Soon said: the liturgical reform etched in Holy Council [cf. text WHO]. Please read this carefully and then make an evaluation: which are written, indicated and granted all liturgical aberrations, many of which are flush with the sacrilege of the Holy Eucharist, who for four decades we've made in many of our churches to the nefarious work of an army of exotic creative priests? In the text there is no trace, let alone legitimacy of the worst now institutionalized liturgical abuses in the fearful silence of the bishops who do not ensure, They do not prohibit and not awarded on the proponents of certain aberrations; if anything, they take strong dislike and make life bitter for those few priests who dare complain as this is not good and what is the duty of bishops oversee and stamp out certain practices in the clergy. Therefore, if the text of that reform does not permit grants what is now plain for all in many of our churches, where does the problem, or rather the catch? Arises from the fact that the documents of Vatican II - as I explained more times [cf. per es. WHO] - use a new language, which affected, for the strong influence exerted by the Teutonic theologians, the typical style of German Romanticism decadent. To this is then added the optimism of Pope John XXIII, convinced that we must not always judge and condemn, but rather talk. Through this set of things we can finally reach the documents that express profound concepts, valid and useful, together with urgent and necessary reforms such as Holy Council, but omitting to clarify through the precise standards that what is right and what is wrong, What is allowed and what is prohibited, if anything, even adding fines and penalties for offenders, the so-called "Anathema sit», often it used in documents of previous councils, who have not been any less of councils meta-council Vatican II, even if in the opinion of the whole foolhardy many theologians, with this last session of the Council seems finally to be born suddenly, after two thousand years of history, the Catholic Church.

.

The certainty and clarity of the doctrine and canon law, It is not only protecting the deposit of faith, of truth and thus the doctrine itself, but also valuable protection for ministers of the sacred ed i believers of Christ, in order to avoid those kinds of injustices and abuses that almost always take life by the poor lack of clarity. In fact, when we hear the "revolutionary" cry "enough of this legalism, with this doctrinal hardness, with this "cult" of canon law!», always it ends up failing both the certainty of the law also erected to protect the members of the Body of the Church, is the clear doctrinal definition of what is lawful and unlawful, right and wrong, what is the truth and against what the other hand is false and erroneous. A quel point, when the lack of clarity leaves room for ambiguity, here is i ministers of the sacred on the one hand and believers of Christ on the other hand, they will end up becoming victims suffering of the free will of those who can make the biggest voice and impose itself despotically.

.

WHERE CAN REACH THE SIN OF MURDERERS Catholic Faith;? UP TO beatify and canonize I POPES IN THEMSELVES HAVE DESTROYED THE TEACHINGS

.

The capocomici of this terrible theater had among other things need to beatify and canonize then all the Popes of the post-conciliar. But beware well: not because nothing interests them the elevation of these Pontiffs to the altar glories, but because through them they wanted dogmatise and finally canonizing the para-council and then the post-council. And all this they did it with a spirit evil delinquent, because the same people who wanted at all costs Blessed and Saints these Popes, are also the same people who are questioning the Humane Vitae imminent Holy Paul VI; They are the same who have destroyed over the past five years the teaching of St. John Paul II, not hesitating to define the Familiar Consortium as a document dated, passed, but above all the result of sexual phobia inherent in the moral rigor of the Supreme Pontiff. but yet, just how much of what they believe, teaching and acting accordingly, but especially undermining and destroying the teaching of these blesseds and saints Popes, They wanted at all costs to canonize John Paul II in record time, instead of waiting for him as for his other predecessors, as prudence of the Church he imposed once, Thirty years after death, before opening a long process, finally reaching, no earlier than half a century after their death, the first stage of their beatification.

.

It is thus clear to what kind of dangerous and destructive criminals we ended up in the hands? It is therefore clear how, these dangerous and destructive criminals, They are wreaking serious damage in the Church, favoring the worst decadence and self-destruction inside, after replacing the clear language and certainly with the "poetic hope", Finally replacing the much-despised "harsh and strict law", with their staff and free will tyrannical?

.

It was old overall context of fifty this weak language, uncertain, apparently permissive and open to all the disparate hypotheses, you have to read the recent case of the German Bishops, but staging political clashes between the party and the conservative party of progressives, as do the so-called lay people engaged who are put at the head of the tiara deposed Popes.

.

All this is at the so-called "salami technique", of which it is granted a slice, but later, a slice behind the other, It is sliced ​​and taken everything. The same goes for the repeated proposal farfetched which presses on one of the greatest destroyers of the Church of Brazil and as such a major contributor of uncontrollable bleeding of his faithful, Cardinal Claudio Hummes, pressing to have - obviously to experiment ― i sources try married ordained priests for the region of the Amazon where there is the greatest shortage of clergy. I say then, hypothetically: we allow the well 'experiment, only to see at a glance how the Amazons will also become Belgium, Holland, in Germany, France and so to follow.

.

BISHOPS OF GERMANY HAVE DISCUSSED ON THIS ON WHICH THERE IS NO REASON TO DISCUSS YOUR OWN, WHILE THE CARDINAL REINHARD MARX PLAYING AT Vestal Virgin

.

Of the twenty-seven members who make up the Episcopal Conference of Germany, plus the Exarchate Professor of Germany and Scandinavia and the Military Ordinariate, for a total of twenty-nine diocesan bishops, who are joined by a total of forty-one auxiliary bishops assigned to the holders of episcopal chairs of these twenty-seven dioceses, seven diocesan bishops in total have sent a letter to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, S. AND. Mons. Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, and the President of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, His Em.za Cardinal Kurt Koch. The signatories to the question are sent to Rome His Em.za Cardinal Rainer Maria Woelki, Archbishop of Cologne [cf. WHO], followed by Their Excellencies Rev.me Ludwig Schick, Archbishop of Bamberg [cf. WHO]; Konrad Zdarsa, Bishop of Augsburg [cf. WHO]; Gregor Maria Hanke, Bishop of Eichstatt [cf. WHO]; Stephen Oster, Bishop of Passau [cf. WHO]; Rudolf Voderholzer, Bishop of Regensburg [cf. WHO]; Wolfgang Ipolt, Bishop of Görlitz [cf. WHO].

.

The request for clarification addressed to Rome by seven bishops concerns an exemplary question: "Such a decision, It could be addressed by a single episcopal conference?». The answer, which it is neither a journalist nor be confined to disputes between secular party, it is easier than you just imagine. Indeed, seven bishops that the question they put, the answer to the same question are very familiar: a single episcopal conference, such an argument can not even dare to face him. What this escaped to all journalists and all lay with the tiara on his head that dipped in fish to comment on this story from them reduced to succulent "party struggle".

.

A quel point, His Em.za Cardinal Reinhard Marx, Archbishop of Monaco of Bavaria and President of the Episcopal Conference of Germany, lowering himself in the role of vestal virgin - role that however well poorly suited to its physical shape, which attracts more an obese brewer Bavaria instead of a Prince of the Church -, even dares to argue the 4 April in these terms: "I'm surprised by the initiative [no. Seven German bishops], because the pastoral resource discussed in February by the Assembly of Bishops of Germany was only a draft and not a final text ».

.

The answer, for many who unfortunately have not understood or understood, other socket instead perhaps even for good, It should be read in three optical delicate linked to the foundations of ecclesiology, the foundations of dogmatic sacramental, to the fundamentals of canon law. And based on these three foundations, the reckless Vestal Virgin Bavarian should know that they had not even dare, to discuss such a thing, all the more so if they wished then change it into an eventual indecent Proposal addressed to the Holy See, if not worse, in a real ratification of the Episcopate of Germany, which before due to Martin Luther, Then centuries later because of the para-conciliar and post-conciliar, it is not always clear that they are Catholics only insofar as they are with Rome and especially in Rome. And these days, to speak to certain vestal virgins Teutonic concept of "Rome" and especially "in Rome», You run the risk of blowing away the dust from their surface to immediately emerge the Lutheran romanofobo hiding under.

.

The Vestal Virgin Bavarian, It should first of all know that for the Bishops gathered in the assembly is not permissible to discuss - to give a concrete example - the legitimacy of women's ordination, because a similar theme can not be discussed, it is a topic that has been closed once and for all through a precise document [cf. Priestly ordination, text WHO] which is expressed so definitive, What this implies that recourse to the second degree of the infallibility of the Roman Pontiff, which it is expressed by means of three different grades, so both defining is definitive [cf. To protect the faith, § 2, text WHO]. Just as we can not argue on the possible legitimacy of abortion in certain special cases and restricted, equally applies to euthanasia, for adultery lawful and so to follow. Always to make some concrete examples: the bishops of any national conference can come together to discuss whether it is appropriate or not to join in marriage of same-sex couples, because the discussion has not really any reason to exist, because there is nothing to discuss. As it is not lawful to discuss whether the case would be better to reformulate the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary or of her Assumption into heaven in body and soul, because those who formulated those dogmas, He has formulated them well; and dogmatizzando these two mysteries of faith, It closed any possible future discussion, even for the restless German episcopate and large insidiatisi German experts like a cancer in the Second Vatican Council, within which, not having been able to play on the substance of the doctrines, They played on language style. And at the moment no one noticed, nobody understood the ambivalent language and not decided, where on the one hand and the other urges are not threatening to those who transgress it, would be a great gateway to the great de-future construction generated an unprecedented chaos, based on the destruction of the legitimate apostolic authority and the imposition in place of the authoritarianism of the flag theologians and laity with the tiara on his head.

.

And by the way that certain lay which it is not quite clear on their role within the Church, They are born to those movements that right under the eyes of the Blessed Paul VI and St. John Paul II have ended up giving life to real churches within the Church, complete with their own liturgies and catechisms, spreading wrong idea heretical and often based on non slight confusion they are doing on the common priesthood of the faithful acquired in Baptism, and the ministerial priesthood acquired the Sacred Order; and here I refer to the Neocatechumenal. To say nothing of the pneumatology of certain self-elettisi lay personal delegates of the Holy Spirit, which it is not easy to clarify that charisms bestowed by divine grace, They are such only if recognized and regulated mainly by the Church, then practiced in the Church, for the Church and under the watchful eye of the Church; and here I refer to certain fringes of the charismatic and the Renewal in the Holy Spirit. All this has produced in the Church that very well explained at the time the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, lamenting the "clericalization of the laity and the secularization of the clergy". Well, Perhaps these were the expected results and desired by the Second Vatican Council that addressed the discourse on the mission of the laity in the Church? If we read the decree on the laity in the Church, between its rows there will find nothing that can justify only distantly certain follies put standing by Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez or by certain charismatic fringes [cf. Apostolate, text WHO]. Where do, so, certi “monsters”? Soon said: the para-conciliar and post-conciliar of the great “interpreters” e “actuators”. Needless to say, if at the beginning of his pontificate, Saint John Paul II, towards these phenomena degenerative state for the last decade, It used the same clarity and severity used towards those who favored the distribution of contraceptives in the countries of the African continent, we would never come after fifty years to the current situation today to the out of control, with ever higher numbers of pastors who ask the bishops to be removed from parishes where lay groups they have completely occupied for decades the scene, imposing on priests liturgical directives, catechetical and pastoral, except make his life a living hell if they dare raise objections; and the fierce and terrible are women, also said the priestesses. All this with no little certain aggravating: under Pope St. John Paul II, these movements was even allowed to open seminars and training future priests, which generally are not the priests the bishop, but the priests of the movement, formed according to the criteria of the movement, often formed even by the laity, and obedient in fact not the bishop, but the movement.

.

Eh, There had occupied a little 'less of condoms and a little 'more than was triggered degenerative level within the Church!

.

PLAY ON SEMANTIC NUANCE IS AN OLD TECHNIQUE OF GERMAN THAT HAS GONE BIG AND SERIOUS DAMAGE TO THE UNIVERSAL CHURCH

.

Had it not been for some careful theologians, including Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, It would be passed with subtle semantic nuances so-called "wild collegiality" in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church The light, in open break with all previous magisterium and the tradition of the Church, thus changing Pietro, holder by divine mandate an absolute record, in a first among equals [the first among their own peer]. Discovered the time to catch, in the text of The light the numbers were well placed 22-24. Afterwards, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, to n. 883 fu printed: "The college or body of bishops has no authority, if it is not united with the Roman Pontiff […] as its head "As such, this college "is also the subject of supreme and full power over the whole Church: this power can not be exercised without the consent of the Roman Pontiff ".

.

All that was concocted during the para-council, though never assimilated and ratified by the Vatican Council II, has been realized, however, in the large "interpreters" post-council and "actuators", including the claim to exercise a "wild collegiality" in open defiance to all the previous magisterium, the tradition of the Church, and to the teaching of the same Vatican II.

.

Cardinal Reinhard Marx, It has therefore clear in itself the Eucharistic mystery and the Eucharist as the "core of the mystery of the Church"? [cf. Church of the Eucharist, text WHO]. The teaching of the acts are in fact clear in affirming: "The Eucharist objectively creates a powerful bond of unity between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches, which they have preserved the authentic and integral nature of the eucharistic mystery. At the same time, the emphasis on the ecclesial character of the Eucharist can become an important element also in dialogue with the Communities of the Reformation " [cf. The Sacrament of Charity, text WHO]. Well, reading these words, what will the Cardinal Reinhard Marx? Can you grasp that while those Orthodox are referred to as "Churches" separate, aggregations born from Lutheran schism are referred to as 'Community'? It is clear to Cardinal Reinhard Marx of difference for us Catholics that runs between Orthodox and Protestants? The Orthodox, separatisi from Rome for the "shape" of and a son inserted in the symbol of faith of Nicea-Constantinople, They enjoy apostolic succession and profess the substance of our faith, beyond different rites in their outer shape and accidental beyond various "shades". The Protestants, that preserve within itself a definite Christian heritage, They are not separated from us by external accidental or the "nuances", but so they are the deep substance of the sacraments and the very way of conceiving the Church, to read and to announce the Holy Gospel. Moreover, the Protestants, do not recognize the primacy of Peter over the universal Church and its full and absolute power, do not recognize the Ministerial Priesthood, do not recognize the transubstantiation and the real presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist. Or maybe you think, Cardinal Reinhard Marx, that all these are only semantic nuances? But if the Presiding Bishop of Germany has some gaps, then, instead of wasting time and perhaps even the Catholic faith in some theological faculties of Germany, could always visit one of our brave missionary sisters that with a few, short and simple words prepare children for First Communion in the most remote villages in Africa; and transmit the purity of the faith to believers of Christ certainly much better than some bloated doctors disaster of German theological faculties.

.

In the Holy Eucharist we are called to be perfect in the unit [cf. GV 17, 20-26], not in the fragmentary diversity of multiple pseudo-churches, because the Word of God founded only one true Church entrusted to Peter, assisted by the College of the Apostles [cf. Mt 13, 16-20]. Furthermore, I understand that in Germany you recite in the Profession of Faith: « … the one, saint, catholic and apostolic church». And in German, if I'm not mistaken "the one'Followed to mean "one", "single", "Unique". This is to remember that Martin Luther destroyer of unity and communion, He was not scheduled yesterday and can not become an emblem of the "good reform" even today. Therefore, though some of his followers married to a Catholic spouse yearn to receive the Holy Eucharist, It must first be clear what is essentially and actually the Eucharist, then they have to undertake a proper catechesis, Finally abandoning errors heresiarch Luther and his followers and enter with a sincere act of faith in the Catholic communion. Only then, They can receive the Holy Eucharist, We remember that it is a free gift like all thanksgivings, it's not a “political right”.

.

perhaps it needed a priest and Italian theologian to remind members of the German episcopate filled with doctorates, and at the same level from clinically affected anthropological Overall Genius and the complex of the culturally superior race, what are the basic rudiments of the Catechism of the Catholic Church that in fact they have been shown not to know the substance of their talk and act?

.

HOW DO I TELL EYEWITNESS: GERMAN BISHOPS HAVE TRIED TO formalize WHAT ARE LONG TIME IN TOTAL contempt AT THE CHURCH TEACHINGS AND TO READ CANONICAL

.

In the past I stayed for several months in Germany and for some time in the Archdiocese of Monaco of Bavaria, already straight at the time Archbishop Reinhard Marx, created Cardinal then a few years later by Pope Benedict XVI. They are therefore an eyewitness of all their abhorrent abuses, to which I attended and which many times I refused to participate. Then I will offer a few examples, which is already reported in my book 2011 in the process of reprinting. Let's start from the Eucharist: in total disregard to what has clearly the Education Redmptionis mystery [cf. text WHO], at the Abbey of Sankt Bonifaz where I was staying, in the heart of the Bavarian capital, I was shocked to see people who were taking the Eucharist with their own hands and dipped in the chalice of the Precious Blood of Christ, unconcerned that here in the document cited, to n. 104 It is imposed: "The host into the chalice Do not allow yourself to communicating intinct itself". Also in the church of this abbey, I saw a woman, after the Holy Communion of the faithful, altar to purify the sacred vessels and a lay lay the Blessed Sacrament in the tabernacle, while the concelebrants were sitting on the presbytery. It's still: i have seen, churches in the archdiocese of Cardinal Reinhard Marx, Women who actually held the functions of the deacon, I saw lay proclaiming the Holy Gospel during Mass, and once, during a concelebration, after a layman had proclaimed the Gospel, I saw him get on the presbytery, a woman dressed in a strange black robe that begins to make the homily. When the brother sitting next to me, murmurs: "But who is this ... what does?». He answered me: "It's a bishop Lutheran, every so often we do these ecumenical exchanges ». At that point I stood up, I took off my neck Stole, I laid it on the chair and left way before the whole assembly ". then when, after Mass, the other priests asked why the foreign priest had gone away, they replied: "Ah, never mind, it's a Roman priest, people closed!».

Not being able to submit to certain abuses, because where I was visiting was not allowed to celebrate Mass in private in some chapel, because I had to be the obligation of concelebrations coerced and put up with all their worst abuses, through the good offices of two elderly Jesuits in Rome, I went at the Faculty of Philosophy of the Jesuits of Monaco of Bavaria where I placed at the disposal one of their several chapels to celebrate Mass.

.

One of my main problems It was also and above all tied to the Most Holy Eucharist, because it was widespread use in the Bavarian parishes that Protestants, spouses or companions divorced united in a second marriage to the Catholic, They went quietly to receive Communion. All this is to clarify, that Roma specializes in pretending not to know and not to know, that Cardinal Reinhard Marx and the assembly of the German Bishops, except for seven that raised a question to the Holy See, they simply tried to "ratify" and then to "legalize" and "formalize" what is in fact already do for many years. All this while Roma continue to pretend not to know and not to know, committed as it is today to speak only of two basic mysteries of faith: refugees and migrants.

.

PETER WASHES HANDS AS SAYING Pontius Pilate: "TRY TO BE PLACED BETWEEN YOU AGREE"

.

And so, early May, a delegation of the German Bishops It met with S.It is. Mons. Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The delegation was composed by Their Eminence Cardinal Reinhard Marx, Archbishop of Monaco of Bavaria and chairman of the German Bishops' Conference, Cardinal Rainer Maria Woelki, Archbishop of Cologne, Their Excellencies Rev.me Felix Genn, Bishop of Münster, Karl-Heinz Wiesemann, Bishop of Speyer, Rudolf Voderholzer, Bishop of Regensburg, Gerhard Feige, Bishop of Magdeburg, Father Hans Langendoerfer S.J. in his capacity as Secretary of the Episcopal Conference of Germany.

.

This meeting ended in a stalemate redolent indecency, through which we understand to what extent under this pontificate Rome is no longer the heart of the Church Mater et Magistra, but only a bored and helpless spectator. Indeed, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, far from giving or to give an answer on an issue that touches the heart of the Church and the center of its unity, He did respond to appreciate "the ecumenical commitment of the German bishops and asks them to find, in a spirit of ecclesial communion, an outcome possibly unanimously ' [cf. WHO, WHO]. In short, he sent them home after having told him in clear substance: "You try to agree among yourselves unanimously" (!?).

.

Needless to ask a question, although unfortunately I must put it: If the Bishops of Germany they had been at odds over key issues that haunt this pontificate, namely refugees and migrants, the Supreme Pontiff, He has been slow to give a clear and precise answer, if anything, well seasoned with one of his sour jokes against those he said variously "hard-hearted"?

.

I think that in two millennia, we can not afford "the luxury" to respond to Jesus Christ with the same question of Pontius Pilate:

.

«[…]”I came into the world: to testify to the truth. Who belongs to the truth listens to my voice”. Pilate says to Jesus: “And what is the truth?”» [GV 18, 37-38].

.

While the house is burning and everything collapses, while the lay people who have worn the tiara placed on their heads by the Supreme Pontiffs and while several journalists improvvisatisi ecclesiologists, theologians and canonists, reduce everything to a clash between the party and the conservative party of progressives, We take note that the Successor of Peter, just like Pontius Pilate, after being asked "but what is truth?», He responded to the bishops of Germany telling them: «And now, Try to make arrangements between you unanimously " (!?).

.

If the Bishops of Germany, unanimously They should agree to give Holy Communion to Protestants, what will happen tomorrow, if another episcopal conference, equally unanimous, decide to unite in marriage same-sex couples? What will happen if another, unanimously, decide that it is permissible to abort the fetus of a baby found suffering from malformation, not considering it right to give birth to a creature affected by imperfections? What will happen if another, unanimously, It decides that it is an authentic act of charity to end the life of a terminally ill and suffering that has no life expectancy? Since when, unanimity, It is a guarantee of sound doctrine and profound respect to revealed truth? These are the questions that, S. AND. Mons. Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, who spoke on behalf of the Pope to the delegation of German Bishops, It should respond to all of us; and it should do it right in his capacity as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, knowing that in the fourth century, the majority of the bishops, They had accepted the Arian heresy. Come May, in that case, an absolute majority did not constitute any guarantee of truth in deference to the mystery of Revelation? there, This it must explain the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

.

These are the facts, it is not humoral opinions dictated by some kind of sympathy instincts, dislike or closing worse reasoning. And before the matter of objective fact, It consists of Peter who washes his hands like Pilate, I have no more to own more, because I know better than to say the least, but especially, and especially when it comes to Peter, It avoids above all, to say more than they should.

From the island of Patmos, 5 May 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.