They say the island of Patmos Fathers

.

MY GOOD VOICES FROM CINEMA EROTIC SEVENTIES: ALLEGED "Heresies PAPAL" THE COMMUNION TO DIVORCED, CRISTINA SICCARDI THE SABAUDA, ANDREA TORNIELLI TO GOGNA …

.

there is no sin so serious, from which you can not break free and divine forgiveness. We should not assume that the divorced and remarried are always in a state of mortal sin. This would be a rash judgment, that would deny free will, as Luther did, and the power of divine grace.

.

.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Dear Father Giovanni.

The ban on communion for divorced and remarried is not a mere ecclesiastical law that the Pope can abolish, but it depends directly on the divine right, which requires a student to be in the grace of God to communion. For thus says the Council of Trent: "If anyone says that faith is sufficient preparation for receiving the sacrament of the Holy Eucharist, let him be anathema ".

Davide

.

.

Dear David,.

The Pope has already explained in 'The joy of love that remarried divorcees, though it is in an irregular status, which strongly induces to sin and though they can also commit mortal sins, however, if they repent and do penance, They can regain the grace. That is why, in principle, They could go to Communion.

.

Remember that there is no sin so serious, from which you can not break free and divine forgiveness. We should not assume that the divorced and remarried are always in a state of mortal sin. This would be a rash judgment, that would deny free will, as Luther did, and the power of divine grace. If they fall into sin, they can always regain grace.

.

Dad, once it was to give Communion to divorced and remarried in a canonically correct document, not attenterà to any divine law. Indeed, in this matter the divine laws in play are two: the law of the indissolubility of marriage and the sanctity of Holy Communion.

.

To understand the meaning of the ecclesiastical law change, that the Pope should prepare to do - from the prohibition of Communion to the permission of Communion -, We have to make the following considerations:

.

.

1) It should be noted an underlying theme, now it is known to all, which it is the basis of the pontificate of Pope Francis, and is that of mercy, understood here as research and willingness to do everything possible, even better than the past, to make available salvation to those who are most at risk. And it is the case of divorced and remarried along with many other cases.

2) It is true that God can save even without the Sacraments [cf. WHO]; but if it is possible to open the door of the Sacraments to a greater number of available people, without offending the dignity of the Sacraments, it's better, and indeed it is right;

3) Pope Francis invites us, on this issue, to turn our gaze in a different direction from that of the past. Up to San Giovanni Paolo II [CF. Familiar Consortium n.84] the church, about the problem of pastoral care for the divorced and remarried, he had under his eyes the dignity of the Sacrament and the public scandal given by the divorced and remarried (“It was irregular”, “public sinners”).

.

The Reigning Pontiff, instead, without of course aside these considerations, It invites us to take rather that God may grant to remarried divorcees, in some cases - to be specified by the new law -, to be in grace, despite their irregular status.

.

4) The granting of the Holy Communion in those particular cases would not be offensive to the sacrament of marriage, but it would safeguard the dignity, although in different ways and even it is contrary to what so far has followed the ministry to divorced and remarried.

.

This is the most difficult point to understand. The moral principle says so: "One and the same moral law, intelligently interpreted, It can be applied in ways materially inconsistent, depending on the circumstances'.

.

Take the case of the commandment Do not kill. Just this command allows you to kill the unjust aggressor, but there is not space here to explain this apparent paradox, for which reference to a treatise of moral theology.

.

Regarding our case, we can then say that the law of the indissolubility of marriage may continue to be respected in certain circumstances, not only with the prohibition of Communion, but also by making it, provided that the divorced and remarried are in a particular situation, which must be specified by the new law.

.

.

.

.

.

Dear Father Ariel.

This war on the field of the Communion for divorced and remarried is getting stronger. Some say that you should not obey the Pope because it is wrong. Then I wonder: who can judge if the Pope is wrong, do not obey him and invite to disobey? the, as a woman, as well as Piedmontese, I am irritated by some comments about carbolic acid covered in honey written by Cristina Siccardi on various blogs, then cited by others as a truth of faith. This writer is probably a star of theology? As a priest, how she reacts, in front of certain subjects?

daisy Altieri

.

.

dear Margaret.

Years ago I explained in my book that everyone is able to obey an authority figure with a strong personality, spirituality and holiness of life, but this is not the challenge of faith addressed to priests and religious, nor to lay Catholic. The challenge is to obey a bishop or major superior to a fragile, limited and mediocre, provided that he does not command things contrary to the doctrine and the Magisterium of the Church and do not use its authority to commit crimes and offenses, because in that case you are required to disobey imperative for the Christian conscience and to inform the supreme ecclesiastical authority of its abuses, order is restored justice violated.

.

If the Roman Pontiff He gives me a wrong order and I was aware of what, First I would try to convince him of the error and demonstrate the substantial mistake the given command, But if it were to maintain in this case the eseguirei, unless it was not contrary to the deposit of credit and Catholic morality. He said this would add: I do not know who can demonstrate how many commands given by the Roman Pontiffs in the course of Church history results are in conflict with deposit of credit and Catholic morality, because I personally do not know of any case.

.

Why is it better to make a mistake to make an order that may appear incorrectly, instead of making the right choice by disobeying the Roman Pontiff? Because in the second case the error would be more and more serious. Then the Roman Pontiff will have to answer before men and history, but especially before God, if it had imposed the wrong order.

.

Affirm this, and maybe blind obedience in contrast with the logic, free will and human dignity, as some tend to believe, marching on those “good intentions” whose streets are paved Hell? Far from it, assert that means to proceed on the path of prudent wisdom. Indeed, the Roman Pontiff enjoys special assistance from the Holy Spirit, therefore a grace which was not enjoyed by individual bishops, priests and even lay Catholics. If in the history of the Church has no memory of erroneous commands imposed by contrasting with the Popes deposit of credit and Catholic morality, Instead they have abundant evidence of how right they later were seen in the years ahead of the choices on the spot hotly contested. This is based on the obedience of believers of Christ and gods ministers of the sacred : the prudent and wise understanding that the Roman Pontiff has a special grace of state and entitled to special assistance of the Holy Spirit that makes it infallible in matters of doctrine and faith [refer to the article of John Cavalcoli: The tasks and the degrees of the infallibility of the Supreme Pontiff, WHO]. And who does not accept this, assuming, if anything, to be invested for greater grace was the power of judgment on certain decisions of the Roman Pontiff on matters of doctrine and faith, or is a heretic, or simply a fool, I saw that the heresy in itself calls for intelligence and talent. And if you always heretics I take them seriously with due respect, fools take them instead around …

.

The Reigning Pontiff, that "deserves" respectful criticism with the devotion due to the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles and Vicar of Christ on earth, He has never given orders, in no act of their supreme magisterium, which are contrary to Catholic faith and morals; and whoever claims otherwise shows at best not to be able to make elementary distinctions between private doctor, the ordinary pastoral ministry, the supreme Magisterium of Peter. Or better understood: It is shown not to know the basics of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, then giving rise to questions only intended to disorient and simple to sow the poison of confusion among the people of God [I refer to my previous article, WHO].

.

For this I have never raised the issue "This Pope we do not like" [Gnocchi & palmar, cf. WHO], and I never fell into the traps of some strong criticism in this pontificate, brandishing towards it charges more or less subtle heresy, formulated through the theories served up by overt heretics unrepentant, how those Lefebvre to be discovered in the aforementioned Christian Siccardi recalled from our Reader, and to which I come now with joy and happiness …

.

… I do not know who this Lady who writes about Siccardiana correspondence, already Correspondence Romana, on which occasionally has delighted readers with articles rose on the Royal House of pirates, anticlerical Freemasons and these were the Savoy [cf, WHO, WHO, etc..], or on levied Siccardiana, already Levied Christian, where articles are published every year to commemorate with the tear to the eye of that figure holy man Benito Mussolini [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO etc..]. At this point I note by the way, before proceeding over, at what levels reach the spirit of these people that thunder for two years against any sacrilege of communion for divorced and remarried persons, including accusations of heresy and some columnist who even invites to resist with disobedience to the Supreme Pontiff. Well, despite their rigor toward adultery and cohabitees, to keep as far away from these Eucharistic canteens, If the adulterer is however the former Duce of Italy, married with children, or her lover and accomplice close friend in adultery, heard what sweetness and Christian charity express the tender souls of levied Siccardiana:

.

"The exact circumstances, the place, time, where they were killed Mussolini and Claretta Petacci, whose only crime was love for Duce, It was in turn covered by a part of history that had a vested interest in spreading a stereotyped vision of events in which there was very little decent and honest " [cf. WHO].

.

Oh, poor Claretta, sweet unhappy creature, considered by bloody rabble partisan and by historical dishonest guilty of having given to adultery with Benito Mussolini. In conclusion, what's wrong with it? What's wrong, to love a married man, husband and father of four children?

.

Once written similar amenities, the same people then go to comb through old articles of the Vatican correspondent Andrea Tornielli, these days in the pillory because “reo” of having reported the news regarding the events of Ettore Gotti Tedeschi and the IOR in a way “uneven” the antecedents of 2013 [cf. WHO]. Well, if from 2013 al 2016 the accounts given by the Holy See or by the Archbishop George Ganswein it differs, the fault lies not with the Vatican expert who reported the facts as they were presented, but who over time has changed version. This is perhaps a Vatican “guilty” not to have pointed out this discrepancy, as Roberto de Mattei says so right on a formal level [cf. WHO]? I honestly do not know which of us, He is having written in the space of three years beyond 200 articles, can remember the precise passage and the exact detail of one of them; What this is true of all the publicists, but for all, including Andrea Tornielli working alone, what I doubt Roberto de Mattei does instead, on the basis of a simple calculation based on his writings and activities. Indeed, Roberto de Mattei, He is engaged as an academic at the European University, Director of Correspondence Romana, director of the monthly Christian roots, director of the Lepanto Foundation, promoter March for Life, consultant to several institutions, author of an average of two articles per week with extra articles published also on The Republic e The Gazette, author of two books a year, He engaged in numerous appearances as a lecturer in Italy and abroad … it is not by chance that this man of the help of collaborators ready to seek benefits sighs and commas of articles written to three years away from a Vatican expert who works alone, so all in all honest and without paleologi–palletizers on its payroll? Come on, you monsters to Andrea Tornielli least the same pity that certain subjects show for Benito Mussolini and Claretta Petacci sweet, which it was not - as many might think, obviously wrong - his mistress, her his concubine, she who helped him to commit adultery at the expense of the legitimate wife Donna Rachele. Absolutely not! Claretta was the only woman who "loved the Duce" and that perhaps the columnists of levied Siccardiana they would not hesitate to admit to the sacraments, together with all well-known womanizer of the House of Savoy, including the last king of Italy, Umberto II, an "honest man" dear to the pink of journalism Siccardi [cf. WHO], also separated from his wife and a nidata of children along with their children have plunged this house of pirates ridicule of the tabloid press and deserved the talk show televisions [see the last glorious heir to the House of Savoy, video WHO].

.

… But back to the Siccardi, whose crass ignorance, with regard to the Church's history and fundamental theology, to me indeed to spare. And it's not my judgment ungenerous, because such crass ignorance oozes from his books, articles and video-conferences, which are public documents, non-confidential material or material covered by Privacy Act. But since you can bacchettare the reigning Pontiff up to accuse him of heresy, I just want to see if it is not to criticize this lady claims the legitimate freedom to bacchettare like a conductor the entire teaching of the Church of the last fifty years, again according to his books and articles, I repeat that public acts are and shall remain. Therefore worth revisited told: “Who acid injures die by acid”.

.

I was then asked how I react before certain figures. To understand this it should first be given that I am not only the son of Dante Alighieri, but also by Giovanni Boccaccio, Pietro Aretino, Cecco Angiolieri and so. Given the above, They say they are not accustomed take seriously some people, I tend to make fun of them and the Profitable circulate the tradi–Protestants which they are derived in part their place in the sun and part of their publishing market, between halberdiers boasting quarters of nobility among the laces&laces of Masses in the ancient rite and aspiring Contessine by Liala novel that poignant recollections of the House of Savoy. I prefer to throw it into a joke, also because this lady from the voice miagolosa, It reminds me of certain actresses erotic film of the seventies. Obviously I am referring to the item, be clear: only to the Voice. Also because we are talking about a sex cinema that nowadays is accordingly punished and modest point that these old films could be screened in cinemas schools for children of the Daughters of Mary Help of Christians.

.

Hearing the voice miagolosa the Siccardi - Objective observation, certainly not irreverent mockery [cf. audio WHO] - I was reminded of the actresses who also spoke with voices miagolose : Edwige Fenech ago The doctor of the military district [cf. WHO]; Glory in the shoes of the Guide night nurse [cf. WHO], Nadia Cassini in the shoes of Professor dancing with the whole class [cf. WHO], to follow with other actresses and soubrette who troubled the sleep of most of us, today fifties, in the seventies when we were teenagers, children in our turn of healthy fathers whose sleep was rather upset in their teens from the image of Wanda Osiris, who wore dresses much more monastic than those worn today by rebel American nuns who have had unfortunate as teachers and spiritual directors the Jesuits of the new Company of the Indies. Even for this many years later we became healthy priests, fell into the world of faith and the real, pace of prudish Lefebvre theater that one out fragrance virginity of heretics which in itself and by itself is more impure adultery [cf. WHO].

.

I can not conclude this survey of actresses from the voice miagolosa forgetting the beautiful and unhappy Lilli Carati, born Ileana Caravati [1956-2014 – cf. WHO, WHO] I will keep a poignant reminder, while avendoci spoken once, after the disease that tore the life had been diagnosed in 2014, meeting her by chance at a cancer center where I went to visit a friend who was in a terminal state. It would be nice to be able to tell what appeared mild and Christian cross the mind of this woman who was preparing to end his life after a long series of bad choices, but it is those talks and remember that a priest must bring with him to the grave. As the tender conversation I had years ago in Ladispoli, while I was a guest of friends, with that soul as unhappy as beautiful Laura Antonelli [1941-2015], that was an icon of beauty and eroticism, now of poor health and physically destroyed, to which I gave a rosary blessed by the Holy Father, before which he bursts into tears of joy.

.

Who is Cristina Siccardi I then try his writings on the bizarre historical and theological level, and his lectures were built on ignorance castles. Instead about how to take it, I would say that could be taken as one that meows in Lefebvrian, while in his rambling lectures enhances the confused and stubborn Bishop Marcel Lefebvre comparing it to the Holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church Athanasius of Alexandria, ie equating facto the Second Vatican Council to the Arian heresy [cf. WHO, WHO].

.

Even more so back with human and pastoral tenderness to my mind the memory of the suffering soul of Lilli Carati, ready to admit their past mistakes, those austere papessa lefebvriana as Siccardi would never admit, ie of being wrong for indomitable pride to self-elect to the rank of expert spin doctors in complex and delicate disciplines such as the history of the Church, dogmatic sacramental, canon law and so on, knowing the hurt the Catechism of St. Pius X, and acting accordingly versus the Church instead in church, versus instead of Pietro under Pietro. All because it presumed to be not only a true Catholic, but the Almighty dealership that owns the authentic truth of the Mystery, just like the boutique d'owns the exclusive license for the sale of intimate Via Monte Napoleone in Milan baby doll and of beehive by Christian Dior.

.

I “immoral moralists ” that the result of the Siccardi and related they tear their garments for months about the danger "heretical"Communion for divorced and remarried, to forget their obvious convenience that the first of the deadly sins, It has always been considered the queen of all the deadly sins, it is not lust, but pride. And this does not teach him the "diabolical secret meeting"Vatican II, to whom, as stated by the Siccardi, the heroic Marcel Lefebvre resisted like St. Athanasius of Alexandria opposed the Arian heresy; This teaches the most holy is always very valid Catechism of Saint Pius X, that they know and teach only when it's convenient to them and where it suits them, to support a pseudo-Catholic ideology increasingly grim, certainly not the Catholic unhappy and unorthodox book published recently by Cardinal Walter Kasper to the praise of Luther [see article by John Cavalcoli, WHO]. This Cardinal is undoubtedly a pro-Protestant and an irreducible rahneriano, with an incorrect theological vision of ecclesiology and ecumenism; in his thought they contain several of the major mistakes of modernism and perhaps it is also the direct proponent of some bad advice given to the Supreme Pontiff, but he would never dare to accuse Peter of heresy or apostasy from the Catholic faith, or break the unity of the Church. This is why, if it really was led to a forced choice with no possibility of rejection, as a devoted son of the Church and devoted priest always I will choose Kasper, never Lefebvre and meows of their acidic kittens e cute that wiggle Masses in the ancient rite, among Halberdiers boasting quarters of nobility and countesses aspirants they beatify not worth the ridiculous historical calamity that was to Italy and the Catholic Church lamented their House of Savoy, advocate of anti-ecclesiastical laws passed by the House of Savoy under the legislative model of Napoleon Bonaparte, as well as written under the direct dictation of Freemasons. All this happened at a time when, at the Royal Senate and the Royal Chamber of Deputies of the Kingdom of Italy, Senators and MEPs state that it was Pius IX calling "pig" and the Pope Leo XIII calling "shitty bone». This is so, if the painful novel siccardian alla recently per aspiring Contessine dreamy, we want to go instead to the serious historical analysis, What this requires first of all that educated people, competent and above series. E la vera culture, the true knowledge and the true seriousness, born and proceed from the rejection of the arrogance and the extraordinary virtue of humility that leads to listening, What unfortunately impossible for those who hear only the reasons for yourself and then change the first absolute truths, then closed ideologies and aggressive.

.

.

.

.

.

.