CAN A CHIHUAHUA WITH THE COMPLEX OF THE FATHER MASTINO VOCALIZE ARIEL, THAT GOD IS A LION?

.

I never imagined that an act of evangelical fraternal correction did I arrive, for the first time in my life, a poorly written letter in which you intimate me to take off an article, only to be sued for libel. Obviously, in addition to not remove the item, since there are no criminal consequences for such an offense, I put the island of Patmos Readers aware than I was received at the same time I answer also to the person concerned.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

To understand this bauble you need to read my previous article WHO

.

.

Egr. Don Levi Ariel Gualdo,

I write this message in the name and on behalf of Dr.. Antonio Margheriti, protagonist of his article published on the Isle of Patmos [Ed. WHO]. I inform you that the content of the text is highly defamatory and offensive and therefore formally invite you to want to remove from the network immediately and without further reminders. I inform you that anyway, my customer, it reserves the right to take appropriate action, in order to protect the integrity and reputation seriously tarnished by you.

So much I owed by mandate conferred.

With best regards.

lawyer. Riccardo Rondelli

.

.

.

Eminent lawyer.

His professionalism leaves me thrilled. I understand you may not know to turn to a former student of criminal sciences; and having said that I do not go further, certain things concerning my previous life, dead and buried. This is to say that the criminal and forensic ethics law, perhaps I know better than her, who has permission to send the message to Facebook reproduced above, without indicating address, Contact details of his study and the place from which sends all. This is unfortunate for a lawyer who would have to send me a registered letter, or certified mail, or ask me with a message to deliver me which address a letter. In any case I've identified its extremes, so that he can report his ethical behavior to the Lecce Bar Association [cf. WHO]. If indeed, as it seems, she did his legal studies in Florence, probably know the popular saying that those parts reads: "God makes them and couples them Christ '. Or as they said once the lawyers of old school and experienced: "Every lawyer has customers it deserves".

.

Moreover, What further serious, She turns to me in a somewhat threatening tone by defining so bold to say the least my writing as "highly defamatory and offensive". This leads me to ask: dear son, but what is its relationship with judicial discipline about the objective matter and substance of the crime? In law faculties, The more we study the philosophy of law, the institutions of Roman law and the history of Italian law, to have precisely, first of all, a clear idea about the matter, the substance and the form of the offense?

.

Allow me to remind which I've Active 7 specialized books published and cataloged in several of the most accredited universities in the world - including the pontifical universities - and several hundred articles published in Italian and foreign magazines and never, in 52 years of life, I had received a message like his, even because, accustomed to offend, and so also a serious, not me but her customer, which opened at the time the old blog Papal Papal with an attempt to scoop Opus Dei. And he sure had to immediately remove the one written, because since there really, in the form and substance, the case of the former libel art. 595 C.P, He was threatened by the most serious legal adviser Opus Dei of a lawsuit by unpleasant consequences. Also it seems that if someone, youngster, It has already had to deal with defamation, this was not me, but his Client who delights in narrating in his writings that when an Apulian public administrator asked for his apologies, he refused to present them and preferred to pay a fine of 2.000 Euro, he considered more honorable than those excuses that, the so-called “Mastino”, perhaps he would never even present Jesus Christ to Our Lord. All this always being faithful to what his Client has repeatedly narrated and written in public.

.

Since then his customer a character as they say, "loses his hair but not the vice», In the 2014 tried another of his own scoop on his blog Papal Papal. And from playful teen which, this time he went heavily to hit Cardinal Beniamino Stella, Our Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy [see WHO]. And I can assure you that the sarcastic and aggressive tones, made insulting the total falsity of the content and the tavern vulgar language used in respect of a Prince of the Church, many people regretted. That article was later deleted after a few days as usual and customary cowards who throw the stone and withdraw your hand, so as not to apologize to the victim after admitting his mistake. The damage, however, there was, is something proved by the fact that the article was taken, translated and published by several blogs around the world, in which it is still available, for example, you can read it in the Portuguese language translation of a Brazilian blog [cf. WHO, WHO], in Spanish on a blog of the Latin America [cf. WHO, WHO], in English translation, and so on … It said this to inform you that at the time, after having reprimanded in private, below the redarguii in public [cf. WHO, WHO], begging him first to let that article on his blog, adding to it a note of profound apology and declaring “surface victim” false and poisonous information given to him by a young man full of hatred priest, previously discharged from the Pontifical Ecclesiastical Academy - an institution that trains priests selected for the diplomatic service of the Holy See -, by the will of Archbishop Beniamino Stella, which at the time he was president and, firing the person in question, acted so highly meritorious. then wants his client to have consistency to admit, least she, how vain I prayed - when I heard that attendance -, not to take at face value the words of that young priest of my sad knowledge, because it was one person injured, false and poisonous from which he would only collect trouble. And so it was, the proof of facts not subject to refutation, just as demonstrated by the story of this latest and “glorioso” scoop.

.

The ability to say “excuse me”, “I was wrong”, it differs a mature man by capricious and arrogant child, that means: this differs from a Mastino by a spocchioso Chihuahua lacking the sense of proportions. And once cleared everything, Now she responds to my question: in what capacity, the objective defamation and actually practiced as a real sport in many of his writings - said in effect right-romanistic –virgin vilified, It should be instead a kind of sacred prerogative Chihuahua camouflaged by Mastiff, But ready to scream behind any grown man - should read “with manly attributes” - That at some point it takes and pedagogical bestows two slaps in the way I did?

.

His Client, who, through its legal is revealed now as a virgin vilified, a few years ago, making improper and improvident leader of the Catholic world, publicly insulted a young woman in such obscene pornographic tones that even the famous porn actor Rocco Siffredi would have been stunned. The young woman responded by answering through his video message posted on You Tube. The damage done to the true Catholic world - which is certainly not that vulgar-insulting his customer - it was really serious, because this young woman, who is not a Catholic and a believer, It considered to have thereby confirming what "not reliable and are especially aggressive Catholics", as she expresses their voice in the public video.

.

In my text [cf. WHO] I used the regret and sternness that the pedagogical occurrence are their those good spiritual directors and confessors that his Client, notorious “bogus Catholic”, He has never had, he being the self embodied in the closing petty mental and spiritual. Is it so insulting and defamatory define its customer as a 'superb'? My good lawyer, but if we were to adopt a similar dream-meter legal measure, she understands that the outcome would send to jail more than half the preachers and confessors? But perhaps it is good that I also enlighten you in this regard on yours virgin vilified. Over the last three years, to its customer we were given the opportunity to collaborate in testing with various magazines and Catholic newspapers: The New Compass Daily, The Rudder, The cross … and all was promptly thrown out for the following reasons: «… is one snooty unbearably smug ". Possibly, if not just my word, may seek guidance to Riccardo Cascioli, director de The compass, Giampaolo Barra, director of Helm, Mario Adinolfi, director de The cross ... and if anyone thought that Catholic journals are made and operated by wicked and cruel people who vilify the illibate, then I lit up which was just thrown out even by some secular newspapers, come The key e Free, without ever being able to do something serious, from registration as professional journalists, or at least of publicists. Or it is perhaps, to the test, the opposite?

.

If a pastor in charge of souls, Addressing a Catholic made as such “alleged” from his blatant closing the grace of God and to every kind of listening, She scolded him and reminds him that in actual fact he is a -nothing maintained by Dad to make unspecified “intellectual” in Rome, addicted to running around the electronic network … she, in legal knowledge and belief, the whole, rather sad fact real, I call it "highly defamatory and offensive text»? And it is perhaps "highly defamatory" remind this Peter Pan that Italy is full of people that at his age maintain their wives and children for years with hard sacrifices, working to make the best in their professions and trades? It is perhaps "highly defamatory" to remind this subject psychologically withdrawn into his own iocentrism, that he had natural talent, united with all the necessary financial means, thanks to which, if he had his humility and train to be guided by good teachers and professionals, this could have been an authoritative signature of Corriere della Sera, instead wasters internetico nothing part that the evidence shows is? Or is it the other way, always test the facts?

.

But if she whereabouts - What really unlikely - a judge upholding and not archiviasse its possible lawsuit, and prepare, in court, to hear the testimonies of some of the most famous Italian journalists, including an authoritative internationally renowned journalist, after vulgar tavern insults from his customer to Cardinal Beniamino Stella, he communicated to the editorship of the Catholic monthly The Rudder - on which at the time his client published on trial some little article -, that if after that article false and insulting directed to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy published on the blog Papal Papal [cf. WHO], They had been allowed to continue to write the columns of the Catholic magazine, he would have withdrawn his signature from the names of the founding members. It intends to sue perhaps even this reporter, guilty of having threatened to withdraw his name from a founding member of Catholic monthly on which the test had begun to write something her customer?

.

Then I fear that his customer has concealed the the evangelical manner, pedagogical and paternal with which I acted towards him, What also easily demonstrated, or: First I wrote to him, last year and then again a few days ago, to reproach him about certain writings, including the latest, scolding him in private that the article-interview was blasphemous to the Holy Spirit [cf. WHO e WHO]. Then I proceeded to repeat to him the whole front of a wise and respected elder, even asking the latter's help, if anything had been able to help me convince the customer of its own mistakes. Having received no response from him, so he is used to not confront the real but only with the virtual, only then I corrected taking it in the public square, also because me, as a priest and theologian, I have to protect the dogma of the Trinity by the stupidities written by her customer, because the Divine Person in a blasphemous and impious way his collegiate customer has pretended to interview reducing dogmatic in burletta, It is my precious “Employer”, and Employer Thanks [incidentally: stoltezza, blasphemy, impiety … They are all technical terms of the theological lexicon, in case he wanted to configure them erroneously as defamatory remarks].

.

To convey to a person like me who behaved in this way, and to which his customer fearful never answered, a peremptory message sent for Facebook by a legal consultant - again for the series "God makes them and Christ couples them" - risks qualifying him and also qualifying those who should assist him, place it at the base of the best forensic art exercise is that prudence - as taught by the old and criminal essays - which should always lead to not take what the client says to gold ever poured conditioned by their moods, or in this specific case from its dissociation from reality and from the inability to hold a fatherly rebuke that perhaps, to his misfortune sum, he has never been addressed in his life, that's why today is what it is.

.

Would invitation to be studied fine art discipline. 595 C.P. on libel, because it expresses the truth, with regret and gracefully, along with a touch of irony not insulting - why insult has accustomed her customer, increasingly in tones tavern, certainly not I -, not only is not a crime, but it is a right protected by the Basic Law of the State: the Constitution of the Italian Republic. Unless your customer wants to fall, in the case of a very unlikely acceptance of the lawsuit by the court, in the crime of defamation against me.

.

That said, as a lawyer of the Magna Grecia that appeals to me in these tones and in these forms he does not deserve to be taken seriously, but it took politely around with his customer, I beg to inform the latter that the Holy See - in this case being the Holy Spirit of God the true person maligned - is seriously pondering to deposit she, a burden to his customer, a lawsuit for defamation protection of divine integrity of the Third Person of the Holy Trinity. In the event to, We Fathers island of Patmos, There costituiremmo civil party in the case based, having the Holy Spirit, very dear to us, inspired the Blessed John the Apostle, that just on the Island of Patmos wrote the Apocalypse, text recently wickedly and brutally mistreated in its customer blog by one of its columnists, who, along with his customer, He puts up with that wrote a real “Associative competition in ignorance” [cf. WHO]. In addition, the advance that I, being in special relations with the Holy Spirit, having received and above all put to good use all the gifts of grace, I prove in court that the Third Person of the Holy Trinity has deviated from that interview, declaring it false. It will therefore be put on record and become material for the formulation of a judgment in proceedings based, the fact that the Holy Spirit, in truth, He was never interviewed by her customer, He'll run into so in various offenses, from the false to the vaunted journalistic credit. She then, first ahead of everyone, will touch the burden in court to question a White Dove made the subject of this judgment, given that usually the Holy Spirit comes to this way.

.

If you think that any judge of the Italian Republic is willing to quibble with Trinitarian dogma - as the actual defamed is precisely the Holy Spirit of God - in this case as well sit down and face his work, But however you try to do it very well, because the legal matter in question is somewhat thorny, and above all avoid having the judge say that … "God makes them and couples them Christ '.

.

She is aware that just to have defined "highly defamatory and offensive" my writing and for giving notice to remove it without that it contains nothing except the sacred truth, under the gauntlet of Article. 595 C.P. You could finish us an angry Chihuahua with the Mastiff complex and certainly not a Lion of God like me? [1] She is aware, Lawyer, what it would mean, find themselves in a place of judgment, having to interrogate and listen to a person like me? How many of his colleagues, more adults and especially much more experienced than she, seek to avert such a possibility in every way, especially then if I asked the judge to be able to make use of the power accorded to defend myself? Or maybe you think me, my life, spent it wasting time on the internet, waiting to figure out what to grow up? Or maybe she, as its customer, is itself devoid of common sense of proportion? Because he sees: If you then move from the virtual to the real that has always been my bread and butter … «‘so c…i amari », would say that nice holy man of the Marchese del Grillo.

My treats.

.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

presbyter

.

.

[1] Ariel Hebrew Ariel, it means Lion of God, name chosen for the priesthood from Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, whose baptismal name given by parents is Stefano.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.