Better the bad man Jorge Mario Bergoglio of those ideological blind Catholics and especially dishonest

- Church news -

BETTER FOR POOR MAN JORGE MARIO BERGOGLIO OF THOSE CATHOLIC IDEOLOGICAL BLIND AND ESPECIALLY DISHONEST

.

By touching the delicate and painful issue of abortion, His Holiness Francis I has used words of a heaviness and a severity never used by the Holy Father John Paul II, that we all know how much he cared to certain themes. Not even the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, while also it is very precise and decided, He never resorted to such harsh analogies. Perhaps they have been hampered by the fact that one was born Polish, the other is German by birth? Because the reigning Pontiff, without going for the subtle he has compared its "selective abortion" the worst practices of the Nazis.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

PDF format Print article

 

.

.

Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo in early summer, during one of his stays in Sicily, along with his “fallen angel in flight”.

There are various ways to capture the spirit of the brave blind ideologues, the main one is surely the lack of critical lucidity, from which it follows the attempt to deny at all costs the evidence by putting an 'It, but …», with all that follows below.

.

The Pope Francis I, receiving and talking to the delegates of of Families Forum [Official text WHO] by touching the theme of marriage and denying that a couple can be made up of two men or two women, then reiterating that this sacred union, Sacramento which is of grace, It should be read in light of the mystery of creation in mystagogical report "made in the image and likeness of God", touching the delicate and painful issue of abortion has used words of a heaviness and a severity never used by the Holy Father John Paul II, that we all know how much he cared to certain themes. Not even the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, while also it is very precise and decided, He never resorted to such harsh analogies. Perhaps they have been hampered by the fact that one was born Polish, the other is German by birth? Because the reigning Pontiff likened its "selective abortion" the worst practices of the Nazis [See press release: WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc ..].

.

mine “fallen angel in flight”, how many of these angels, today do not come more?

The Supreme Pontiff noted: "Somebody sees ever more around dwarves"? And referring to amniocentesis, with which in the first weeks of pregnancy can occur if the fetus is not suffering from any kind of malformation, It has further called classical times, When in ancient Greece imperfect children they were thrown off a cliff and killed. And for several times he has called abortion a "murder". To this I add a personal capacity, since it has always been close to with Down syndrome, that in many of the European countries “evolved” the children down do not come more, for a simple reason: They are killed before they are born, after being declared nothing more than "a lump of defective cells". Instead, other countries, starting with Italy, for the children down There are centers of extraordinary care and socialization carried out by excellent professionals and many volunteers who are dedicated to these creatures first with a hyper-affection sometimes really unbelievable, to say nothing of their innate sympathy.

.

The Supreme Pontiff, in depicting the social degeneration and ethics in progress, It characterized by the fact that today there are more children, He does not hesitate to tell:

.

"Once I met the couple for ten years, childless. It is very delicate to talk about this, because many times the children you want, but do not, it's not true? I did not know how to handle the matter. Then I learned that they did not want children. But these people at home were three dogs, two cats…" [Official text WHO].

.

Honestly, we would have expected to hear say those certain Catholic fringes exercising the right to criticize the ministry of this pontificate, often in awe of catastrophic tones, the Supreme Pontiff, dealing with issues related to the family, marriage and life, in condemning certain drifts it was a lot harder than its predecessors; especially in order bluntly abortion legalized, pointing several times as a murder. Instead, all these have been silent. They have spoken the great ideological organizers of the marches for life and have not issued sigh hunters “papal heresies”. Not a line comment was published in Correspondence Romana headed by the Lepanto Foundation, even two lines penned last coda with movenza Nunziante [cf. WHO], perhaps because they are all engaged in the organization of yet another conference on Old and new modernism, where will be speakers of different authors correction filiall the Supreme Pontiff? [cf. QUThe]. And then, If these statements before the Supreme Pontiff, we want to take note of what is the most blind, virulent "It, but …», just read the last article on the Blog Rossoporpora [cf. WHO].

.

mine “fallen angel in flight”, how many of these angels, today do not come more?

Among these columns de The island of Patmos, the flaws and human limitatezze Jorge Mario Bergoglio we put them repeatedly disclosed, sometimes even in the strongest possible, species before more facts and dangerously ambiguous expressions of the Supreme Pontiff. But always we are saying and stating that we will always be with Peter and under Peter. Better to have the bad man Jorge Mario Bergoglio of certain ideological blind Catholics, but most dishonest, that even in the face of expressions of a just and extraordinary severity do not hesitate to begin with a "You, but …», if not worse completely silent.

.

Stalin, which incurred are enrolled millions of deaths and many more millions of persecuted, He had affirmed the right thing, more so his critics, just to look serious, honest and trustworthy, They would have had them first to highlight the right statement, thus making it more credible way their criticism of the Soviet dictator. If, however, this will not come distinguished historians, Theologians concerned about the attacks on the Deposit of Faith, Catholic journalists, promoters of gears for life and organizers of conferences devoted to the reigning Pope in order to highlight its heterodoxies, then it means that we are being quite ill. And, just before this evil, more mindful than ever of the defects and human limitatezze Jorge Mario Bergoglio, we say with certain faith that we will be with Peter and under Peter, because others' They are blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a ditch!» [Mt 15, 14].

.

He was bad man Simon son of Jonah [cf. Mt 16, 17-18] and defective man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, They were burdened with limits even saints Popes Leo and Gregory the Great, but none of them was blind, from small to large. Instead, who to blind ideology does not see and does not want to see, It can only lead to a ditch. Obviously, needless to say: with all the best intentions; exactly those good intentions of which are paved all Hell reception rooms.

.

Rome, 17 June 2018

 

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanksgiving [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

About isoladipatmos

18 thoughts on "Better the bad man Jorge Mario Bergoglio of those ideological blind Catholics and especially dishonest

  1. salve ,ariel kind father would like to ask what there is ideological in making a march for life? given the place everywhere the culture of death, a group of Catholics who fights for life should be encouraged by hierarchies ,but the pope was silent indeed there was the impression almost of his annoyance at these beautiful manifestations and now blames their silence, except that a pope has to say these things on abortion necessarily, it is his duty to confirm us in the faith ,but then that is the praise of a known abortion as bonino calling “great “one remains astonished as well as of the entry of abortionists in the Pontifical Academy for Life ,or participation by the Vatican secretary of state parolin Bilderberg in Turin, What am I thinking ?Thank you

    1. … in conclusion, He is a person, whoever it is, says the right things, She, instead of saying that those things are right dates, He can not do just less than delegittimarla remembering all the wrong things said possibly earlier?

      What is the point to remember Mrs Bonino, before the Pope condemning tones hardest abortion, using parallels than ever dared to use any of its predecessor? With what logical and exhibition spirit, she mixes in a few lines: by abortionists Academy for Life meeting of the Bilderberg Group? And tell me, Mr. Spock, Vulcan with pointed ears Series Star Trek, where he left?

  2. kind father ariel not nobody delegittimo ,I expect a Supreme Pontiff is always consistent and confirm the faith his sheep,I noticed one thing when Benedict XVI spoke of abortion ,and the non-negotiable values ​​the press attacked him ,Francesco does not happen I wonder why

    1. … because Benedict XVI is the product of a Teutonic psychology in all respects, from a linguistic speech: in German language, a given word, It does that word and another that word. The German has been decided and precise by nature, For better or for worse.
      An Argentine is the product of another culture and psychology: She never tends to say things directly but indirectly principally, the words, in the Spanish-Argentine language, They may have different meanings, the style and setting of speech.
      If the Pope, instead of a German or an Argentine, was an Asian, favors the country's membership, would have other characteristics, even more complex.

      Benedict XVI, for training, It is the product of centuries of ecclesiastical culture, as a member of the secular clergy. Francesco I, for training, is the product of a religious culture, and most importantly a culture limited to the Society of Jesus in a precise country in Latin America.

      If the Holy Father Francis is not attacked, It is simply because the press and who is behind it has made a further and dangerous “breakthrough”: They came up with a Pope who does not exist. Therefore, in luce, They are put only certain things and omitted others. This of course also because of the Holy Father, that interloquendo so offhand with journalists, It should never say things vague and ambivalent, lingering in the lack of clarity and improvising speeches using a language – the Italian – that is not his mother tongue; language they speak, but which has a deep knowledge far and in which is expressed loosely and with extreme poverty of words. Not everyone can be a multilingual staff as the Holy Father John Paul II, because over the centuries have been beatified and canonized men and women who only spoke their language, sometimes bad, or even their only local dialect. We even have a doctor of the Church who was illiterate and could not read and write: St. Caterina da Siena.

      As for consistency and more, I can tell you that you have long since ceased to demand it from the other time, preferring instead to demand it of myself. To bring me to this kind of attitude over the years, were just so many faithful Catholics, and yet again: many. Those faithful who demand the bishop, the priest and the Pope, all those virtues, that purity, that righteousness, that commitment, that spirit of sacrifice, spiritual life and prayer, they never would practice even for half a day, But unless demand and demand from bishops, Priests and by the same Pope, the exercise of all those holy virtues which they have not even touched.

      Therefore, the Holy Father Francis, I do not expect much, or maybe not pretend nothing, whereas, from myself, I demand a lot.

      1. In one thing, however, I believe our Holy Father Francis, Conscious or not to be, He is master: let the rot that's come to light in the Church and certainly in our hearts.

  3. Father Ariel Caro, I have followed with interest the conversation / argument with the reader "Fabius". My opinion is that something is still due from her to him, and recognizing a duty towards every person of good will, that expresses with simple complexes vice versa concepts words. Oh sure, she is a very clever and cunning polemist (and this is an observation, not a judgment on the merits), able to put in difficulty every possible counterpart. It remains, however, the Gospel saying ”Let what you say be: Yes, Yes, No, No. The more is from the evil one”. And Jesus said to all, Also for South America. I will not dwell, nor intend to pose as master, God forbid, I am a poor man of a certain age, but practical world.
    Cordially
    Licio Zuliani

    1. Dear Licio Zuliani's father Ariel I can not respond publicly that I am right,otherwise the church so much merciful Bergoglio haunt him, as his father Cavalcoli a truism about the possible divine punishment due to the earthquake in central Italy, l have crucified,we are in the hour of darkness ,but the day will come when God will wipe away the false church
      oremus

      1. Fabius was,

        the Church is not – and can not be false – is the Bride of Christ, of which He is the head we are living members.
        I understand what you mean, then I try to express myself with the right words, because in doctrine and theology, language is crucial, because we can not proclaim “false” that church every Sunday then proclaim "A, saint, catholic and apostolic ".

        False, and even worse than false, have always – and not just from today – the men who inhabit the visible Church, who lord in his ecclesiastical and administrative apparatus; often men without faith, who crave power for power.
        While the Bride of Christ, despite his wrinkles and sometimes even evil men that populate, Santa stays.

        1. Caro father Ariel

          The term false church have taken from the visions of Emmerich and the two popes blessed. What do you think about it? And the apocalyptic prophecies of Madonna delle Tre Fontane?

          Thank you

  4. Of course to me, the above title, it brings to mind another, also to effect: “Better the heretic Martin Luther of those corrupt prelates and especially dishonest”, or “Better the apostle Judas, which it has in a clear manner betrayed, of those apostles who denied Jesus and above all fled”!
    Well, This article applauds the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, Since – and also it must be said – After well over five years he would have used clear and strong words on abortion and family ...
    Great! But in all this time because he had never spoken so clearly? Why has (quasi) opened his pontificate with the programmatic motto “Who am I to judge?”… Yes, but who? Homosexual persons, indeed even what a few of them have been received at the Vatican, between smiles and encouragement (see the internet unmistakable photographic evidence, about that) and why in previous “famili day” (four to be exact) He never says a word, I do not say loud and clear, But at least one little word ...
    It welcomes, therefore, to a pope, today spoke of “papa”! Indeed this is big news, worthy of note …

  5. Salve father Ariel ,she is quite sure that the press has invented a pope who does not exist?son 5 years that the church is going to tutto.non it seem odd? Don Minutella says Bergoglio pope is not ,but the pope is Benedict XVI because he was forced to resign,What do you think? We thank

  6. Thank you Father Ariel intellectual honesty, rare thing on blogs and unfortunately sometimes uncommon even on Catholic blogs. I do not always agree with what he writes, but I never noticed that she alters reality to adapt it to his thinking, as is too often do I see around. The use of false or altered or partial are the meanest instrument of slander. A half-truth is more dangerous than a lie, because in addition to being untrue, however, it is likely.

Leave a Reply