- Actuality -

WHEN A TRAGIC PONTIFICATE ENDS IN SATIRA: THE ROMAN PONTIFF GUEST AT TALK SHOW OF THE LEFT FRICCHETTONA BY FABIO FAZIO WHO FOR YEARS TAKEN CATHOLIC DOCTRINE AND MORALITY BY THE ASS THROUGH THE ARMED ARM OF LUCIANA LITTIZZETTO

How can you go, or how you can be present even and only with an external connection of a few minutes ― we do not know if it will be in the studio or if it will be connected ― in a living room where the poisonous Luciana Littizzetto has been throwing shit on the Catholic Church and the clergy for years, mocking doctrine at every turn, Catholic morality and the pastoral care of the Italian Bishops?

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

.

I will turn to the Holy Father Francis calling him Jorge Mario Bergoglio for an entirely ecclesiological logic that it is good to explain. In my writings and speeches, in my homilies and conferences I have always addressed the Successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter calling him: Supreme Pontiff, Roman Pontiff, or Holy Father, because such is Francis I at the moment in the fullness of his legitimate and indisputable apostolic authority. And it is for that grace of God, often intelligible in our eyes as Catholics that we have experienced many moments of this pontificate as an authentic misfortune. It will take many years, maybe decades to be able to read and then understand how God has filled us with grace through this unhappy and sad pontificate, especially today in its last and desperate swings of the tail. Often, throughout history, God's mercy has bestowed the best graces through misfortunes. An example: after the great plague of 1348, referred to by historians as black Death O big black plague, arrived in Europe from China - for a change! - which exterminated half the population of our continent, it came to life a century after the great Renaissance period.

.

So if I say Jorge Mario Bergoglio it is because I intend to make a clear distinction between man and the office of the Roman Pontiff, perfectly aware that the office is conferred on man and that the fullness of the Petrine ministry exists in the man who is clothed with it. This is something that we priests and theologians are aware of, knowing full well that Simon son of Jonah (cf. Mt 15, 17) he ceased to be such to become Peter, the stone placed on the cornerstone which is Christ (cf. At 4, 11; Ef 2, 20) on which the Incarnate Word of God built his Church (cf. Mt 16, 18-19).

.

If the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio was also one of the worst, or even the worst pontiff in the entire history of the Papacy, all of us priests and faithful owe him devoted respect and filial obedience, always and regardless. Worthy or unworthy he is the legitimate successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter, who received his mandate from Christ himself, transferring it to all his Successors, of which the reigning Pontiff is the holder in legitimate line of apostolic succession. The Roman Pontiff, when it expresses itself in matters of doctrine and faith, he enjoys the special assistance of the Holy Spirit to the point of pronouncing himself infallibly. But when he acts as a man or as private doctor he can take actions or indulge in those inappropriate expressions, unhappy and misleading to which Jorge Mario Bergoglio has by now accustomed us for nine years now. In this case, like everyone else, he is subject to criticism and reproaches, because neither some of his repeated zibaldoni pronounced on the plane at high altitude nor his unhappy chats with Eugenio Scalfari can be elements of supreme magisterium for us, much less binding. In fact, as the Holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church Ambrose of Milan said at the time:

.

«Tell the Bishop of Rome that after Jesus Christ he comes for us, that we venerate and respect him, but also tell him that we don't intend to use the head that God has given us just to put a hat on.".

.

After this clarification Let's get to the heart of the problem: to the proven test of facts, the reigning Pontiff has never ceased to be Jorge Mario Bergoglio to become Peter, that is, Francis, as he chose to call himself. Stubborn and undaunted, he continued to be Jorge Mario Bergoglio, an upstream Jesuit poorly trained on a theological and ecclesiological level between the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 1970s, clearly contemptuous of Romanism and incapable of understanding that it is synonymous with Catholic universality, finally landed in Rome with all the worst anti-Roman prejudices fomented by the Germans in that Latin America they used as an incubator of all the worst theological and ecclesiological drifts. And so, for the first time, we found ourselves on the Chair of Peter a man steeped in contempt for Rome and Roman Catholic universality. And who denies this, the mind, or lives outside of reality, or more simply, it refuses reality in order not to come to terms with the horror of Leopardi's true memory.

.

Years ago I explained that the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio could not even be called a provincial, but a headquarters. The analysis is contained in an article of mine from 2017 to which I refer you and in which I explain that "quarterlyism" - a non-existent term in the dictionary because it was coined by me - "is worse than provincialism, why the headquarters is a person linked on a psycho-social level to the neighborhood of a specific city or metropolitan context". And now try to imagine a headquarters sitting on the chair from which Peter must govern the universal Church, certainly not playing the egocentric eccentric in a neighborhood of Buenos Aires.

.

The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio he immediately showed himself to be sick of originality, even in a very serious way. It's all part of his character structure, because that's how it's always been, structurally. He must do the opposite or the exact opposite of what all his other predecessors did, until it shows, perhaps completely unconsciously, of not even having the perception of the dignity with which he was invested. Dignity which, however, does not belong to him, but which was given to him only on loan for use and for which he will have to seriously and gravely answer to God according to the terrible warning of Jesus Christ:

.

"To whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " (LC 12, 48).

.

Speaking for the sinner I am, therefore as a person liable to fall and relapse into sin, I confess publicly, especially to you silent Bishops and Cardinals, that I would not want to be in the place of the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, because according to what the Holy Scriptures report, from Christ risks being told: “I did not entrust to you the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven so that «whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and everything you melt on earth will be melted in heaven " (Mt 16, 19), so that you would drag my Church into a theater of ridicule amidst the laughter of jugglers, of the dwarves and the dancers of the equestrian circus". Nor would I want to be in the place of the silent Bishops and Cardinals, who before the Holy Bride of Christ exposed to the shame of ridicule, they find nothing better to do than engage in that sin that seems to be the most popular among them: the sin of omission, combined with the destructive cynicism of those who slothfully wait for the wind to change, without having to lift a finger, without taking any initiative, without taking on a single responsibility, except jumping with a sprint like professional athletes onto the next leader's cart.

.

It's been two days that I am receiving phone calls from brothers scattered throughout the dioceses throughout Italy, shocked and lost after hearing the news that His Holiness he will be a guest on Sunday evening a What the weather is the known talk show conducted by the very sinister Fabio Fazio, who embodies the most politically correct bias of the left radical chic, that of hippies with super-penthouses in Parioli and villas in Capalbio, other than the poor, and migrants, the existential peripheries and the various warhorses of the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio to whom these leftists have always applauded every blow he inflicted on the dignity and credibility of the Church. And I carry out the ministry of confessor and spiritual director mainly with priests, I have the opportunity to feel the pulse of discomfort very well, especially of suffering, because as I have explained several times and as I am now repeating: in what Jorge Mario Bergoglio defined as «The Church field hospital», We are in the emergency room to welcome the injured, he isn't there, nor the ruffians busy flattering him in his court of miracles made up of ideological poor and dreamlike migrants, fruit of his obsessive-compulsive neurosis. And more and more frequently, the red crosses that arrive with sirens blaring in the real emergency room of our equally real one Church field hospital, from above the stretchers they unload priests and faithful in pieces, before which one often has to say: and now, where to start, to sew pieces together and close wounds?

.

How can you go, or how you can be present even and only with an external connection for a few minutes - in fact we don't know if it will be in the studio or if it will be connected - in a living room in which the poisonous Luciana Littizzetto has been throwing shit at the Catholic Church and the clergy for years, mocking doctrine at every turn, Catholic morality and the pastoral care of the Italian Bishops? How can you… how can you… this is the question asked to me in recent days by priests who have contacted me from all over Italy: how can the Supreme Pontiff fall so low and therefore drag us all down?

.

To all these brothers I responded in various ways, for example by expressing that as priests we were ready, if necessary, also to anti-Catholic persecutions, even to die as martyrs for the faith, because our sacred ministry can also involve these possibilities, in their own way imprinted in our own DNA of priests. Of course, none of us were prepared to die in ridicule, thanks to a Supreme Pontiff who decided to play the jester in the sinister court of Fabio Fazio and Luciana Littizzetto.

.

From decline to decline in popularity into which this pontificate has long sunk, loved by all that is not Catholic but suffered with tears of blood by devout priests and faithful, what the original and eccentric has in store for us in the future headquarters Jorge Mario Bergoglio? He's already been to the optician to buy glasses, He recently went to the music store to buy a record. Needless to say, although it bears repeating: all with such casual spontaneity to the point of being followed by the personal photographer and awaited on site by as many photographers. And tomorrow, what will he do, to raise theauditel? He will be filmed by international television while sweeping the churchyard of the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter with the broom, or while washing the dishes in the kitchen Domus Sanctae Martha singing «One morning, I woke up, oh beautiful hello, hello beautiful …"? Or who knows, after the doctrinally confused and heterodox Bishop Tonino Bello, he will also have heroic virtues proclaimed super life, virtues and reputation of holiness by Ernesto Guevara known as el Che? Because from Jorge Mario Bergoglio, in case you didn't understand, O my Excellent Bishops and Eminent Cardinals, At the moment everything is to be expected, specie a 85 years of age. Maybe for the first time, in Church history, we have a Supreme Pontiff comparable in every way to an unpredictable and uncontrollable loose cannon.

.

In this article of mine I did that painful dirty work which certain members of the Roman Curia and the Italian episcopate do not have the courage to do, given the dramatic and meandering lack of virile attributes. Of course, we know perfectly well that throughout history we have had martyr Supreme Pontiffs, Holy Supreme Pontiffs, Political Supreme Pontiffs, Simoniac Supreme Pontiffs, Libertine Supreme Pontiffs, Supreme Theological Pontiffs, Supreme Pontiffs who knew little or badly about Catholic doctrine... we have had all kinds of them, but all of them legitimate successors of the Blessed Apostle Peter, up to and including Francis I. In the two thousand year old collection only the Supreme Pontiff was missing, a jester at the court of the politically correct left of Fabio Fazio and Luciana Littizzetto. Now we will have that too, while the words of the Venerable Bishop are of bitter consolation Fulton Sheen:

.

«When God wants to punish humanity he does not give the Pope he needs, but leave the Church the Pope it deserves" (cf. The priest is not his own, 1963).

.

I conclude by clarifying that Saint Bernard of Clairvaux and Saint Catherine of Siena would have used much more severe tones than mine. Of course, some poisonous clerical might reply that they were holy doctors of the Church, while I don't. It's true, but in this case it would be good to remember that when Saint Bernard wrote these words to Eugene III:

.

«You can show me only one who welcomed your election without having received money or without the hope of receiving it? And the more they have professed your servants, the more they want to dominate within the Church" (Treaty good for every Pope, written for Eugene III, born Bernardo de’ Paganelli)

.

or when Saint Catherine of Siena, to the Supreme Pontiff Gregory, because its stench had now reached his city too, well: neither one nor the other had yet been proclaimed Saints, least of all doctors of the Church. And with this I have said everything, to certain poisonous, susceptible clericals ready to look for the speck in my eye so as not to see the beam that Jorge Mario Bergoglio has stuck in his own eye (cf. LC 6, 41), at risk, I'm afraid it's getting more and more serious, of the eternal health of his soul:

.

"To whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " (LC 12, 48).

.

the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2022

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.