The solemnity of the ascension of Christ God, the relay race and Nelson Mandela
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian
( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian
( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Latest posts by Father Gabriele (see all)
-correct or better specify this step : “we know that in the Ascension the Apostles received the Holy Spirit”.
– revise the ruffling by citing double-player communists.
– explain in what sense passages of the holy Gospel according to Mark are to be understood here since otherwise , given the non-confirmation of such things in the life of almost all Christians ( hopefully not deviating using only the usual Alexandrian allegorism ) , one could quote from the holy Gospel according to Matthew 7,21-23 as well as getting depressed about his own testimony.
Happy Pentecost
Thanks for the correction, very fraternal indeed.
We will suggest to Father Gabriel the author of this article, graduated in philosophy from the University of La Sapienza in Rome, graduated in theology and with a post-graduate specialist license from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) and in the process of obtaining a research doctorate in sacred theology, to come to her to learn the fundamentals of the Catechism and to learn the correct reading of the Holy Gospels.
We are very grateful to you.
E… please, next time, when he decides to fuck i Fathers of The Island of Patmos like this, has the virile attributes to sign himself with his name and surname, because the doctrine and the Gospel that we know – or at least the little we know – he does not consider anonymity to be honorable and worthy of a man at all.
Thank you!
Don Ariel should have easily understood that I wrote to catch two birds with one stone since gods 2 his 3 of the points expressed are a mere mockery that at most wanted to elicit such answers from her and her straw tail of badly found flogger.
Net instead of an answer of the factor of the article, my point 1 it was about specifying / correcting let's say “to date” of the arrival of the Spirit precisely useful for those who could answer “but it was not Pentecost?” while on point 3 candidly it would have been nice to read an explanation and I just wanted to add some pepper ( aware that I had to gnaw her bottom ).
His rhetoric on anonymity, like on titles or whatever, I don't even touch it because it knows when to use it and when not or in this case I have to reveal the inherent fallacies? I said I do not touch them because I respect the titles and those who exhibit themselves, God forbid.
E’ the second point is the problem : it would be better to study who was the nobel of peace (hahaha) in question because if usually the tones above are somewhat unpleasant and we get carried away in being spicy, even starting to name infamous so lightly in communication is a very bad sign as well as sad in a certain sense.
But neither is it cold nor callus so much, and then I did well! Anyway, thanks for accepting my comment and for having alluded to my non-belonging to “the doctrine and the Gospel that we know ” of the church, which is currently my fault and I do not deny…