THE ATTORNEYS OF ITACA AND THE EPIC OF THE ENFORCEMENT THAT CANNOT BE SILENT

The only ones Sfranta never gets angry with are the suitors, we remember are the approximately one hundred nobles of Ithaca who in Homer's Odyssey insistently court Penelope during the absence of Ulysses, but that in the modern version clerical-rainbow instead they court Odysseus and ignore Penelope altogether.

—Hypatia's cogitatory—

.

.

Let lobby clerical-rainbow it is preserved by avoiding direct exposure. He doesn't act openly, does not take responsibility for the most controversial decisions. He prefers to operate through third parties, using subjects that act as a screen, by performers, from expendable tools. They are the classics straw men they useful idiots: figures in charge of doing what the lobbyists decide, once the illusion of counting has been instilled in them, of belonging to the clerical power and of being able to gain some recognition from it. Here is a sample of what was just said in the image below:

In the clerical world, these subjects are often clericalized lay people who enjoy, just as such, of an operational freedom that others cannot afford. They are the ones who intervene where i clerics-rainbow they do not intend - or cannot - expose themselves directly: they delegitimize, they offend, they report, they accuse, they give rise to proceedings without real foundation, aware that they will not produce any concrete results. What matters is not winning, but carry out disruptive actions, intimidate. This is the goal.

They act convinced that they matter and to have weight within the clerical power structure; in reality they are used precisely because they are replaceable, exposed and expendable. Reduced to mere executive tools, they are destined to absorb the brunt of the darkest deeds, those with whom i clerical-rainbow those who pilot them do not intend to get their hands dirty. They think they're leading, while in reality they are direct, in the manner of the worst subordinate servants.

This mode of action is not episodic, but structural. I clerics-rainbow thus maintaining a safe distance: they don't sign, they don't speak, they do not appear. It is always the one who exposes himselfuseful idiot, to whom the dirty work is entrusted. It is the same mechanism that is found in every organization that intends to exercise control without openly assuming the moral and legal weight. Responsibility remains invisible; the action, instead, it is very concrete.

Alongside this first category, a second one emerges, more aggressive and dangerous: the one that the late Paolo Poli used to call, with unrivaled theatrical precision, the “sfrante”.

Clericalized to maximum power and characterized by bitter militancy, vindictive and sometimes openly violent on a relational level, the Sfranta, instead of building a dignified present for a mature future, he prefers to spend his days attacking his own social whoever decides on the spot: today the members of the National Association of Magistrates defined by her as "the worst of criminals" as well as "para-mafia association", tomorrow the Minister of Justice accused of being "colluded" and "clown", follows a well-known magistrate referred to as a "convict" and "more criminal than all the others", the day after tomorrow he throws flames on the members of a dicastery of the Holy See indicated as "illiterates" and "idiots", the President of the Journalists' Association defined as a "vulgar longshoreman", one of the most famous Italian journalists and television hosts branded as "the most vomiting" and "repressed bully", to follow up with the plumbers, the mechanics, unisex hairdressers … no one is saved from the Sfranta.

etc… etc …

The only ones Sfranta never gets angry with are the pass, that we remember are the approximately one hundred nobles of Ithaca who in’Homer's Odyssey they persistently court Penelope during Ulysses' absence, but that in the modern version clerical-rainbow instead they court Odysseus and ignore Penelope altogether.

Amazing reports follow in a cascade: exposed to the Order of Psychologists against one of the most famous Italian criminologists; threats of a lawsuit against a diocese that dared to officially deny the Sfranta with a public statement from the curia after it had repeatedly offended the bishop in various articles; invitations to sign an official protest to remove from the chair a theologian of recognized preparation and undeniable teaching qualities …

The Sfranta does not limit itself to acting as a passive instrument of the system, but she becomes an active actress, driven by the frenetic objective of clearing customs and legitimizing the fantastic rainbow world inside the church. And if anyone opposes the entry of this Rainbow Trojan Horse within the walls of City of God, the accusation is ready and the critic branded as an "affectively unresolved subject". La Sfranta acts as a true vanguard of the system: he says and writes, via blog and social media, what certain clerical-rainbow they cannot afford to state publicly; it strikes those whom the latter cannot attack directly; exerts constant pressure through accusations, insinuations, reports to the ecclesiastical authorities, letters, exposed, delegitimization campaigns. But be careful not to deny it, or to react to his barrages of insults, is never! Right there and then he immediately proclaims himself a victim, shouting about discrimination, according to the now known and consolidated schemes of Sfranta’s logic.

The “strength” of the Sfranta lies in the almost total absence of constraints. It does not answer to any ecclesiastical authority, does not risk canonical sanctions, does not pay any institutional price. He acts, de facto, in a gray area of ​​substantial impunity, which renders any attempt at a proportionate legal reaction ineffective. For this reason it is very useful to certain groups of people clerical-rainbow who use it while maintaining an apparently neutral position: because she is the one who exposes herself, to talk, to write, to report; the puppeteers remain in total anonymity.

I clerical-rainbow that govern this system they rarely appear on the front lines. They observe, they protect, they orient, leaving it up to Sfranta to act and put her face to it, in a desperate attempt to delegitimize priests and theologians hostile to this Rainbow Pious Brotherhood. It is in this context that a Sfranta without any formal mandate turns into a promoter of "reports" motivated by an alleged zeal for the good of the Church. In addition to his writings, he also releases videos in which he sighs, she sobs and indulges in little moves that recall the satirist's less gifted sister Rita da Cascia played by the aforementioned great Paolo Poli.

No explicit accusation, no concrete evidence: just allusions, suspicious, sentences dropped with apparent discretion, in the hope that, by dint of repeating blatant falsehoods that are repeatedly denied as such, these end up being perceived as true, finally passing as such.

It is within this opaque environment that the Rainbow Pious Brotherhood finds the ideal conditions to consolidate and reproduce, remaining anonymous and sending a Sfranta who walks a tightrope on the attack, uttering insults and making bold allusions to behaviors that are indicated as criminally relevant without ever openly naming the targeted person, but making everyone understand who this unnamed person is, soon after, he begins to receive numerous messages from readers and friends who warn him «the Sfranta has taken it out on you again».

In this sense,, Sfranta has set a precedent. So much so that I decided to imitate it with the exact same technique: I didn't mention her, just like she doesn't name, often, those he heavily targets.

And now I say goodbye, I have to rush to assist Penelope, deeply depressed since i suitors of Ithaca they started waving the flag rainbow and to woo Ulysses while totally ignoring her. Even the suitors of Ithaca have now done an honest thing coming-out, or as Saint Augustine said in one of his famous sermons: «I can not remain silent (I can't keep silent)» (Sermon. 88, 14, 13, PL). Like this, they decided to do not be silent (don't be silent) and to openly court Ulysses.

From the Isle of Proci, 8 February 2026

 

 

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of:

Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers:

Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff,

the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.