I Neocatecumenali, the conquest of Asia thanks to the armed wing of their “useful idiots”, They won the battle, however, it remains a question: reasonable doubts about the validity of sacred ordinations …

- ecclesial news -

I NEOCATECUMENALI, THE CONQUEST OF ASIA THANKS TO THEIR ARMED ARM "USEFUL IDIOTS", They HAVE WON THE BATTLE, BUT REMAINS A QUESTION: REASONABLE DOUBT ABOUT THE SHELF LIFE OF HOLY ORDERS PRIESTLY …

.

What have they concocted, Kiko Argüello and his, by relying on the armed wing of their "useful idiots"? In deference to the truth, you must admit that Arguello has won the battle. And no one, He has won percent. We can also make it well-deserved military honors, because after all he deserves it well. But be clear: He won the battle, He has not won the great war. Because the victory of the Great War, He has already been ascribed to Christ the Lord Blessed John the Apostle who has it told in advance in the prophetic Book of Revelation. And if you do not convert to really, Kiko Argüello and his "useful idiots"; if not really ask for forgiveness, for the immense damage that have brought and that they continue to bear the Church, for their, after the great war won by Christ the Lord, unfortunately it will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. What this that the true believers are afraid animated by holy fear of God, the “useful idiots”, I do not know …

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

The legendary Mary Poppins who comes down from heaven with his umbrella and his hat …

The Sacraments, except for Baptism, where the infant is presented to the Mother Church dispenser of grace to be washed from the stain of original sin, produce their effective saving action first encountering the freedom of man. Just for example, think of the Sacrament of Marriage, whose ministers are the couple themselves, which is based on free consent [CF. Catechism of the Catholic Church, NN. 1621-1632].

.

There is only Sacramento which it is required by others for the benefit of a newborn, and it is baptized. So, unless to ask for baptism is not an adult, the question posed to the parents who have the creature is as follows: «What are you asking of the Church of God?». Respond parents: "Baptism".

.

Baptism It is therefore that action of grace that parents ask the Holy Church for their son, so that it is purified from the stain of original sin. Baptism, Is it a decision made by others on an infant incapable of understanding and willing? It deals with, perhaps, an imposition made by parents on child, come in adulthood, could decide, exercising their reasoning Free, instead of not belonging to the Catholic Church? Would not it be better - as now they support different parents - it's him, gives adult, to decide whether to be baptized or not, thus avoiding that parents take the decisions for him as an adult might not like, so do not recognize?

.

These questions, seemingly reasonable, actually they rely on their total lack of reasonableness. It's easy to say why: the decisions that parents take on a newborn or a child, They are really a lot. Moreover, Parents are also bound and obliged to take, these numerous decisions, many of which are intended to affect the future life of the child himself.

.

With a concrete example and far peregrine we try to make clear all: for the onset of a serious illness, there is the painful problem of having to amputate a limb to a baby a few months. The limb can not be saved and if you do not provide amputate, There will be an inevitable gangrene. Reasonably: what parent would answer that before amputating a limb, it is good that the baby grow and acquire the necessary cognitive skills, then deciding whether to deprive him of a limb or less? What parent would respond by saying that they can not take the risk of finding themselves tomorrow before a grown son who reproaches him to have consented to the amputation of a limb against her will?

.

Original sin, for us believers of Christ It is something that should be cut to prevent gangrene of the soul. For this reason parents ask the Church of God Baptism.

.

Other Sacraments instead they imply will and deliberate consent, even when it comes to children. In fact, if a child refused to receive First Communion, or if a teenager does not want to receive Confirmation; if the first manifested that he did not believe in the Eucharist and the second in the Holy Spirit and his actions of grace, neither the priest nor the bishop would ever oblige him to receive these sacraments, indeed, they would dissuade them from receiving them, if they are a Catholic priest and bishop respectively. How many times have I - and like me several of my confreres who really and substantially consider the sacraments of grace for what they are - have dissuaded young people who had nothing Christian, from celebrating sacramental marriage, considering they just didn't believe in the Sacrament, they thought the church only a soundstage, and the priest who had received their consent and blessed their marriage nothing but the appearance of a theatrical skit? And how many times it happened that these priests respectful of the Sacraments, who demanded as much respect for the Sacraments even by non-believers, They had to suffer the reproach of the classic bishop “arid official”, which has more or less attacked them saying: "Do not be so strict!»?

.

The Sacrament of Penance, sacramental confession, in order to make effective the action of grace contained in it, It requires an essential prerequisite: repentance. A priest could also play a hundred times the sacramental formula of absolution from sins, but if the penitent has not repented, those words are worth exactly what the nursery rhyme of the legendary baby sitter Mary Poppins singing to the two children: «Supercalifragilistichespiralidose» [see, WHO].

.

We now come to the Sacrament of Holy Orders, because today would be good to ask terrible questions that, up to sixty or seventy years ago, They would constitute academic papers based on elements considered per se absurd, both in terms of dogmatic sacramental and on that of the Discipline of the Sacraments regulated by the Code of Canon Law.

.

Even for the Sacrament of Orders, The requirements are minimal. But, these minimum requirements must be met. Even in this case, we proceed with an example: a bishop might take the student to a yeshivah Jewish - that is, a rabbinical school -, or the student of a theological school Calvinist, arranged for various reasons and reasons to receive the Sacred Order, and hallow priests?

.

First of all, let's not be penalty takers, or as it is fashionable to say these days: "Arid legalists". It is true that the first of these two subjects, the jew, not believe in the divinity of Christ, while the second, Calvinist, He does not believe the apostolic priesthood and the Holy Eucharist. But, if for reasons of various kinds - that have nothing to do with their accession to the the Catholic faith, They decide and agree to be consecrated priests, where is the problem? Or perhaps we should not be "cozy" and "including"?

.

Of course, the "grim Pharisee" contemporary might ask: lacking the foundation of faith and full adherence to the truth of the Catholic faith, these two, have been truly Sacrament of Orders? So: are two priests in every way, After that Bishop, in observance of the liturgical books and the Discipline of the Sacraments, has imposed on his hands and prayed over them the prayer of consecration?

.

If this question someone wants to say yes, stating that the ordination is valid because it took place according to all the rules provided, so that the two, they are believers or not, priests were consecrated, then in that case we could say: the Lord that during the celebration wore on his head a headdress called miter, and was holding a stick called pastoral, it was actually Mary Poppins with her hat on, holding her umbrella in her hands and singing and dancing joyfully: «Supercalifragilistichespiralidose».

.

To the newly consecrated presbyter kneeling before him, the bishop delivers the offerings of the faithful, the bread and wine for the celebration of the sacred mystery. Offering him the offerings he says these words:

.

«Receive the offerings of the Holy People for the Eucharistic sacrifice. Be aware of what you will do, imitate what you celebrate, confirm your life at the sacrifice of the cross of Christ " [From the Rite of the sacred ordination of presbyters].

.

Question to which I have no answers to give, because it is others who are entitled to respond, starting with the Prefect of the Congregation de Propaganda Fide, who deserves the credit for having carried out yet another devastation, as we will see shortly ... that's the question: what is the perception of the Most Holy Eucharist, infused and transmitted during the entire formative cycle to the seminarians of the Seminaries mother of The Redeemer, who come from Neocatechumenal families and who were raised and educated in that Neocatechumenal Way in which the Eucharistic Sacrifice is relegated, by the two founders of the sect, to "an element connected to the Eucharist out of compliance with the pagan mentality", which "broke in after Constantine" and causing "the mass of pagan people to see the Christian liturgy with their religious eyes, aimed at the idea of ​​sacrifice "? [CF. Guidelines Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández catechists of the Neocatechumenal Way, in use since the year 1972 and reissued in 1988, pp. 321-323].

.

The two founders of the Neocatechumenal Way, They have not passed for decades a conception deformed and deforming of the Mass, openly denying the sacrificial element in the manner of heretical Calvinist doctrine, de-structuring all very foundations of dogmatic sacramental?

.

It's all documented. But not only: You have perhaps never publicly corrected from mistakes? Far from it: it was them, gangrene in their heresies, who have repeatedly declared bishops error, priests, theologians and lay faithful to dogma and obsequious deposit of credit, as they say "not yet open and ready to real mystery of Easter».

.

Lacking any requirements a correct perception and then of full membership of fide the dogma of the Holy Eucharist; possibly missing the correct perception of what actually is really the Catholic priesthood, including the fact that it is serious and genuine error Heresy, as taught Kiko Argüello, that "we are all priests" [CF. Guidelines, pp. 56-57], how, we can speak of full and perfect validity of Holy Orders conferred to people undoubtedly most worthy, in human terms, but in fact the "non-believers", of the spiritual? In a deformed element before the family, then from Neocatechumenals catechesis, then by a seminar neocatecumenale, in whose soul has been instilled and ingrained these heresies never abjured and never corrected from the two founders, how objective efficacy Bishop can deliver the offerings of the People of God saying:

.

«Receive the offerings of the Holy People for the Eucharistic sacrifice. Understand what you will do, imitate what you celebrate, confirm your life at the sacrifice of the cross of Christ ".

.

We realize, that we are dealing with an absurd, a real paradox? That this priest was formed first by family and mega-catechists, then in a seminar to celebrate the Neocatechumenal "dinner" according to all the trappings worst heretical infusions in Movement by Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández; infusions and, I repeat, never abiurati and correct. How can the bishop give him offers for the "Eucharistic Sacrifice", considering that this word is definitely banned, within the Neocatechumenal Way, because the Mass is not a sacrifice, but the renewal of the Passover meal during which the brothers are having a party around the joyful mess? We want to realize, the proven and documented proof of the facts,Kiko and Carmen did catechesis training to its mega-mocking catechists for decades the concept of Eucharistic transubstantiation [CF. Guidelines, pag. 325], up call with ironic disdain "Sacrament" the worshipers of the Blessed Sacrament? [CF. Guidelines, pag. 317]. In short: if a candidate for holy orders had a Catholic perception is of the Holy Eucharist is the Priesthood, it would not be able to become a priest, a seminar Neocatechumenal, nor ever could be a priest, in the Neocatechumenal Communities. Exactly how could it not be a priest in one of the various Orthodox churches, if he considered the Roman Pontiff endowed with the power full and absolute over all the Church, and if considered valid and just the concept of And the son inserted in Flags of the Catholic Church.

.

And so it was that we found out, during the sacred orders, in a corner of the chancel, not far from the ordaining bishop, Kiko Argüello with his guitar singing passionate: «Supercalifragilistichespiralidose».

.

That said it is clear, we are making a legitimate theological speculation academic, so that it is neither to plead offended, nor to declare harmed in its majesty cardinal, nor to make enough that they are not in any way required to descend from their Olympus to lower the levels of those seeking answers. In fact it is to give answers to this question, that is simple and easy to evade: where missing full adherence to the tenets of the Catholic Church, a correct perception of the Holy Eucharist and the Eucharistic Sacrifice of the Mass and a correct perception of the Catholic priesthood, we can speak of unquestionable validity of priestly ordinations of deficient subjects of these basic foundations of faith, since induced to reject as erroneous these foundations themselves, starting from the Eucharist understood as a sacrifice of sanctifying grace? It's just so hard, answer a question like?

.

The Cardinal Fernando Filoni, I do realize that I am not a priest and a theologian, but a bum who bivouacked in St. Peter's Square and pissing and crapped on the marble under Bernini's colonnade [cf. WHO], because maybe, in that case, I consider quite worthy of response, rather: the evening also will race Cardinal Konrad Krajewski to bring me coffee, if not committed it is to join the light in some busy community center [cf. WHO].

.

Since it is said that the worst there is just no end, just as I was preparing to close the draft of this book, there came a news disheartening to say the least:

.

"The Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples has officially established the College mother of The Redeemer for evangelization in Asia, based in Macao, entrusting its management to Neocatechumenal Way. The college was established by a decree signed by Cardinal Fernando Filoni, prefect of Propaganda Fide, the 29 last June, after an audience with Pope Francis. The college mother of The Redeemer for Asia "will open its doors in September, with a core group of students from different countries of the world. The initiative intends to respond to the appeal of John Paul II, in the encyclical letter The mission, It marked the Asian continent as a geographical area, "To which ought to be chiefly the mission to nations” (n. 37)» [The Osservatore Romano, edition of 29 July 2019, text WHO].

.

To better understand it is necessary to point out that the current Prefect of the Congregation de Propaganda Fide, Cardinal Fernando Filoni, before being consecrated bishop participated as a priest to the courses of catechesis of the Neocatechumenal Way, just as the current Archbishop Giovanni Pietro Dal Toso, Secretary of Propaganda Fide and president of the Pontifical Mission Societies.

.

Here is the disturbing element: New Macau seminar, It is not one of the simplest and many seminars mother of The Redeemer run by the Neocatechumenal. It is indeed a place seminar under the direct jurisdiction of the Congregation de Propaganda Fide. Or to clarify: It does not depend on the jurisdiction of the diocesan bishop or the directives given by the local Bishops' Conference for the formation of priests; this seminar will depend directly from a dicastery of the Holy See. About that, Cardinal Fernando Filoni, in his interview reported by The Osservatore Romano, It describes this work as an actual experiment of "decentralization" of Propaganda Fide, doing this:

.

« […] it's not impossible that, one tomorrow, born like that other Boards, promoted by the Congregation, in other continents'.

.

This seminar in Macao It was opened under the direct jurisdiction of the competent dicastery of the Holy See, after the Neocatechumenal have repeatedly failed to give the boarding to the small but rich Catholic Church of Japan.

.

could he, The "messiah" Kiko Argüello, accept such a defeat, he who is Lord of all things visible and invisible? But once again the race to conquer the small but rich Catholic Church of Japan, again nuanced. We learn directly by the Archbishop Metropolitan of Tokyo, S. AND. Mons. Isao Kikuchi, that in August 2018 He is said to have received a letter from Cardinal Fernando Filoni informing him of the next erection on the territory of his diocese a seminar mother of The Redeemer employed directly by the Congregation de Propaganda Fide. Or in other words: put him fait accompli. The Archbishop declared himself very confused, before that letter, born to him, born H.E.. Mons. Peter Takeo Okada, its predecessor, They were in fact been consulted in this regard. Having clarified all in short it is worth remembering those who were among the 2008 and the 2010 the painful events in which the Japanese bishops became involved with the Neocatechumenal Way, that ended with the closure disposed in the 2008 by the bishops of Japan of their seminary opened in Takamatsu Diocese in 1990.

.

But since the Neocatechumenal, that part of the delicate culture of Japan moved like drunken elephants in a showcase of crystals, they continued undeterred to create divisions and damages among the faithful, In the 2010 He was ordered by the Bishops' Conference of Japan to suspend any kind of their business across the country. In short: in fact they were declared "subject unwelcome" and expelled.

.

This improvident letter from Cardinal Fernando Filoni, by the proud Japanese Episcopate he has been received and suffered as a clumsy attempt of Mr. Lay Kiko Argüello and his equally fierce settaristi lay, to have won all Japanese pronouncements on costs, this time using the armed wing friend of a figure, in political language, hath been used to indicate with technical and not at all offensive term "useful idiot".

.

What will be the next step, aimed at destroying through neocatecumenalizzazione forced Asian Churches, some of which, their deep devoted love in Rome, they often paid at the price of persecution and bloodshed? How will it be done, to bend down from the sect of neocatecumenalesimo? Thanks to my friend "useful idiot" is perhaps lay Neocatechumenal seminars open to employees and burst directly from Rome, given the previous results of drunken elephants walking into the delicate glassware Japan, avoiding further closures and expulsions decreed by the bishops? In Asian mission lands, Perhaps it will proceed to erect the apostolic vicariate entrusted to lay Neocatechumenal, which will manage the Neocatechumenal bishops and priests Neocatechumenal baked in their service to this multinational heretical, you can use the "Factory of priests" of Seminars mother of The Redeemer, granted to them with questionable prudence by the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II? The administrative and pastoral decisions which - well to remember this immense army of ignorant -, They do not fall within the exercise of infallible teaching nor are dogmas that require, As such, full membership of faith. God forbid that the official recognition of the Neocatechumenal sect did in 2012 by the Pontifical Council for the Laity, was placed, level dogmatic, so as to oblige believers to full membership of faith, between the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, the dogma of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary! And if John Paul II has canonized, like some shouting Neocatechumenal, then elevated to the altars, It remembers that the Holy Church has canonised his every thought, decision, choice and sigh; from unhappy concession he made to neocatecumentale sect to open the prototype of their first seminar mother of The Redeemer in Rome in 1988.

.

What have they concocted, Kiko Argüello and his, by relying on the armed wing of their "useful idiots"? In deference to the truth, you must admit that Arguello has won the battle. And no one, He has won percent. We can also make it well-deserved military honors, because after all he deserves it well. But be clear: He won the battle, He has not won the great war. Because the victory of the Great War, He has already been ascribed to Christ the Lord Blessed John the Apostle who has it told in advance in the prophetic Book of Revelation. And if you do not convert to really, Kiko Argüello and his "useful idiots"; if not really ask for forgiveness, for the immense damage that have brought and that they continue to bear the Church, for their, after the great war won by Christ the Lord, unfortunately it will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. What this that the true believers are afraid animated by holy fear of God, the “useful idiots”, I do not know …

.

the Island of Patmos, 31 July 2019

.

AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO READERS: UPCOMING PUBLICATION

Please be advised that immediately after 15 August will enter the book distribution Ariel S. Levi Gualdo on Neocatechumenal sect. It is a completely built on positive text documents and authentic testimonies equally documented. In about 280 pages of text is first of all made a rigorous historical analysis, Theological and Juridical of this phenomenon, Although steeped always serious heresies, He could proliferate as a dangerous sect intra-ecclesial, unfortunately also counting on the weakness of recent popes, conditioned against their will by a church and ecclesiastical situation manageable, pouring now in a state of deep and unfortunately irreversible decline. The work of Ariel S. Levi of Gualdo was dedicated to the memory of two venerable priests and Roman theologians: the Servant of God Pier Carlo Landucci [1900-1986] and Father Enrico Zoffoli C.P [1915-1996], who first denounced with prophetic foresight, although unnecessarily, the serious and dangerous heresy of the Neocatechumenal Way.

.

 

.

.

Visit our Librario Store and support our work and buy our books published: WHO

.

.

 

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:









or you can use the bank account:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]