That Eugenio Scalfari white-haired clown continues to offend the Supreme Pontiff, while the Holy See continues to remain silent, instead of denying

/in /by

- we defend the Holy Father from false friends -

CANUTO THAT CLOWN EUGENIO SCALFARI CONTINUE TO OFFEND THE POPE, WHILE THE HOLY SEE CONTINUES TO REMAIN SILENT, INSTEAD DENY

.

It is our sacred duty to defend the Successor of Peter, who you are required to be a master of wisdom and prudence. We can also expose Scalfari games, but we can not fail to take note that the Holy Father is manifested sometimes unwise. If you admit this, an army of faithful astray, wounded and grieved, it would ask us this question which would not be easy to answer: He admitted that Scalfari claims and write nonsense attributed to the Holy Father, who is receiving it and that speaks to us, if not the Holy Father himself? And after Scalfari he has made certain shoot, How come, the relevant information organ of the Holy See, do not deny? And to answer a similar question, unfortunately it is not easy.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

God catches the wise in their craftiness

The Cor 3,19

.

.

.

Giovanni Cavalcoli is not vegetarian, is only one patient …

The escalation of those who shoot biggest, it seems to have no end. The Devil, that throughout history shows considerable ingenuity in always repeated and always vain attempt to destroy the Church of Christ, starting with the Papacy, who it is the rock upon which Christ wanted it rests [cf. Mt 16, 13-20], He is suggesting to his human instruments regarding the pontificate Pope Francis, a new, subtle and effective tactic, to discredit and overthrow the Papacy. This subtle tactic is inspired by a method which so far, the Evil, He had never adopted; a refined technique as paradoxical, that is no longer that of traditional denigration, ie to attack the Pope in the name of modernity and progress. It is not what it used to accuse the Pope to oppose the reforms and freedom, person indicated as closed to the prophetic voices, or as a reactionary bastion of conservation and the worst backwardness, representative of the ruling classes and a God prohibitionist and legalistic, as well as terrifying provoker of guilt. All charges, these, which were different but similar riots, very turbulent historical periods, both to Blessed Pope Pius IX is the Holy Pontiff Pius X.

None of this, in our present which it is a real hive of skilled and blatant sycophants, fake fake admirers and associates that arise like mushrooms everywhere. These characters, falsely interpreting the teaching of the Pope, It would give us to understand that he is the modernist or, as they say, «Progressive», obviously intending to progress in their own way, certainly not in that sense imprinted on the deepest and Christological ecclesiology that brought the Blessed Paul VI to give us the Encyclical Development of Peoples [cf. text WHO].

Among all flatterers, the most famous, the most ingenious, the biggest faker and provocateur, It is certainly Eugenio Scalfari, which we review a couple of formidable outputs, Dating back to the 2 August and one at 9 October. The first of the two outlets - one in August -, ironically it is indicated by Francesco Agnoli on daily The truth as a formidable output, of historic significance: "The usual Scalfari uses Bergoglio failed to show a church". The things, But, They are not exactly like [cf. WHO].

The operation is more fiendishly subtle: Scalfari pretends to be an admirer of the Pope and thus affected not want at all to destroy the Church, but you enthusiastic spokesperson and interpreter - he, atheist - as the Pope of "revolutionary today», It means the Church. Indeed, he would have us believe that the Pope proposes a new model of Church, that in reality, if we do care, is false church-good, secularized, relativistic, meatloaf, turncoats and politicized, designed and prophesied by Freemasonry since the eighteenth century and modernist laggards, as a philanthropic society and a-dogmatic, that enter, as malleable member, the international federation of religions under the chairmanship of the international community. What it was once the dream of Leibniz and the secret society of the Rosicrucians in the seventeenth century, then that is the dream of all the Gnostics.

In this episode cited by Francesco Agnoli we can add a new recent reported by Seismograph the 9 Last October and taken by Republic. The words are as follows Scalfari:

.

"... Pope Francis abolished places after death the souls should go: Inferno, Purgatory, Paradiso […] All souls have the grace and therefore are born perfectly innocent, and these remain unless you take up the way of evil. If they are aware of it and do not repent even at death, they are condemned. Pope Francis - I repeat - abolished the places of eternal residence in’ Beyond the souls. The thesis he sustained is that the souls dominated by evil and do not repent cease to exist and those that have been redeemed from evil will be made from bliss contemplating God. This is the thesis of Francis' [text, WHO].

.

These things that Scalfari attributes to the Pope are false, They would make the Pope a heretic and they are just as well, pure inventions of that incredible brazen that Eugenio Scalfari. What the wicked at death cease to exist and do not go to hell is not an idea of ​​the Pope, but heresy Edward Schillbeeckx [1]. And to demonstrate this, If there was need, sufficient to mention these words said the Pontiff to the Mafia, filming a stern warning already addressed by the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II [cf. video WHO] members of mafia groupings:

.

«Be converted, There is still time, not to end up in hell. That's what awaits you if you continue on this road. You have had a dad and a mom: think of them. Cry a little 'and be converted " [cf. WHO].

.

And also we take care of these other words Apostle John, who still continues: "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire" [cf. AP 20, 14]. It is those damned. The Pope wanted to dwell on this very sentence of the Apocalypse: "This is the second death, the lake of fire " [cf. supra]. In reality, has explained, "Eternal damnation is not a torture chamber, this is a description of this second death: is a death '. And "those who will not be received into the kingdom of God - he explained - is because they have not approached the Lord: They are those that have always gone their own way, moving away from the Lord and pass before the Lord and go away on their own ". Therefore, "eternal damnation is constantly straying from God, It is the greatest pain: a dissatisfied heart, a heart that has been done to find God, but for pride, for being too sure of himself, He has turned away from God " [cf. WHO].

Another thing in which Scalfari shows crass ignorance of Christian doctrine, It is when you ask:

.

"Who should be the existence of the Devil? It's a power contrary to God, or is God himself in a robe deliberately opposite to the natural? The Catholic-Christian religion obviously distinguishes between good and evil, but it does not address the origin of evil: it is God himself who created it when he recognized his human creatures the right to free will?» [cf. WHO]

.

We may limit to respond referring to these astonishing words to Catechism of the Catholic Church. However, we give a short answer. As taught by the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215, "The devil and the other demons were indeed created by God good, but they themselves have become wicked " [Denz. 800]. As for the origin of evil, The Bible teaches clearly that it must be attributed to the evil of Satan: «The death entered the world through the envy of the devil and experience make those who belong to him" [Sap 2,24].

God has given to His creatures, angels and men, freewill; but the misuse of this is not God's fault, but of the creature. Men are not born innocent, but with the stain of original sin, that is removed from Baptism. The new tactics of the enemies of the papacy was truly fine. Let's look in more detail the operation diabolical cunning of these flatterers, that is unbelievable, if he had not supported by the facts. That, that for now - while it lasts -, it works, is that the traditional enemies of the Church: Protestants, Freemasons, Liberals, Epicurean, atheists, positivists, relativists, idealists, pantheists, gnostics, Communists, a die-hard enemies time, open and declared the Church, Today they did, in a grandiose tacit pact, a kind of shameless turnaround. With incredible chutzpah, often under the bishops reticent eyes, They have infiltrated the Church in the modernist and robes and rahneriani, from the inside of the Church, posing as outposts of progressivism, It has gone from hot allegations to the Popes of the past to the effusive praise than today, praise evidently affected, the use of dolphins, twisting in their favor certain the Pope's speeches, that does not always shine for clarity and, honestly, we have to recognize as well that are sometimes equivocal. All this to support their lies, keeping silent on the major issues of faith and morality to which they manifestly contrary, then taking dishonestly, that upon which the Pope is silent, as a denial or a formal refusal on his part. So, a fraud of gigantic proportions epochal, making it appear the Pope, grin with pleasure, like one of them. In doing so - Think about it - the Church today has no more external enemies, because suddenly like the world. Enemies are now all interior and I'm: or masked, how modernists, or open, as Lefebvre.

The modernists, that until Benedict XVI attacked the papacy, Now make the praises. But were modernists; and they believe and do believe that the Pope is one of them. But - for the uninitiated - Modernism is a heresy and it is not possible that a Pope is conscious heretic.

But, as the saying goes, the devil makes the pots, but not the covers. Because of this, their game, can not let filter of cracks; and of these the most obvious is the shot of Scalfari - that we shall soon see -, shot that, among all those of flatterers, It is the biggest, the most brazen and the most tacky, but also the most brilliant, which as such, while undoubtedly denotes a sharp mind, He discovers evidence dirt and dishonesty of the game. It is a stab that hurts deeply. But we can heal. "We have to study it in depth", says Scalfari. And he's right. But with its criteria. One would curse him. But we must remain calm and look into the issue.

But what is this shot? It's the following. Dad, Scalfari said four years ago

.

«[…] It is revolutionary in many aspects of his albeit brief pontificate, but above all on a fundamental point: in fact it abolished sin. A Pope who has changed the Church, indeed the Church hierarchy, on an issue of this radicalism, He had never seen, at least the third century on the history of Christianity and did it operates simultaneously on the theology, on the doctrine, on liturgy, on the organization. Especially on the theology […] This is the revolution of Francis and this is examined in depth, especially after the publication of the Apostolic Exhortation The gospel of joy, where the abolition of sin is the most shocking part of all this very recent document ' [item, WHO].

.

This shot of Scalfari requires adequate psychological and moral analysis, because with undoubted, even if mischievous sharpness of view, touches or, we could say, to pinch, albeit with coarse brutality, but also with a certain openness, albeit down, just what seems to us the central issue of the Pope's preaching, not quite clear on this point, and evokes, which apprentice wizard, a ghost of the bad conscience of the contemporary gooders: the question of sin.

If it were not Scalfari which is dishonest quell'intellettualmente, God would give him the ability to be an intellectual adviser to the Pope. Maybe - if I'm not naive - you should read his message down or negative, as if to say: “Francesco, parlaci of peccato!”. Of course, that, He took as they are, Scalfari's words are objectively a terrible insult and slander to the magisterium of the Pope - although Scalfari believes him a praise -, and to the Catholic doctrine. It is perhaps a boutade? The thing is too serious to joke. A shot to get publicity? It's possible, but Scalfari does not pay too high a price for its reputation? An atheist has nothing to lose maybe? No, It also has a conscience, with which he has to answer to God. And so I want to take it seriously and respond briefly, even though the issue would require a book.

First, the penalty demand: but the Pope who makes? He notices all this? To tell the truth, Unfortunately, It does not give signs in this sense. Neither he nor whoever he intervenes to correct bad interpretations. Come May? He can not keep up with all? the snubs? It's afraid of the reactions? He is not informed? Difficult to answer. That approve, when it comes to heresy, is unthinkable. The least one can say is that the situation is abnormal, never occurred in these dimensions and frequency with previous Papi.

Scalfari, taking advantage of the Pope's silence and benevolence of those against him, raises the bar. But for how long this horrible joke? This affront to papal dignity? It is the thing that disturbs more. It is obviously interpreting the phenomenon in order to safeguard the dignity of the Pope's magisterial, and do not make room for Lefebvre who accuse him of being a heretic. What to say, so?

Let us see what are the responsibilities from one and the other side. The blame for this huge mistake and this terrible devil is, in my opinion, from both sides. It looks like a game of hide and seek or mirrors, If the situation were not tragic, and we were not going half souls. The Pope is pastorally unwise and imprudent, It lends itself to the game, It seems driven by a certain opportunism, and the modernists, who are scoundrels, take advantage shamelessly. The Pope is maneuvered and at the same time it leaves maneuver. He believed to be circumspect, but do it without even noticing. It should help the Pope to free themselves from modernist.

So the thesis of flatterers of the papacy palingenetic, heralded with enthusiasm and plenty of media from the rooftops to millions of gullible believers and gloating, is that, after centuries and millennia, we finally the turning point of a Pope "revolutionary" (Scalfari), the Pope of the God who does not punish, but who forgives all (Rahner), the poor Pope, of workers, the exploited and immigrants, promoter of freedom of peoples (Mature), leader of the international left (Castro, Gutiérrez, Maradiaga), Indeed, the Pope finally introduced freedom in the Church (Bianchi), Pope's mercy and tenderness (Ronchi, Cantalamessa), ecumenical reconciliation (Kasper, Küng), the dialogue between the "faiths" and the Church "spontaneous" and "relaxed" (Radcliffe), the Pope's primacy of conscience (Soda), of modernity (Cricket), tolerance and tenderness (Straw), the Pope of the universal brotherhood, even with the Masons (Ravasi) and Muslims, the Pope BUSINESS (Galantino) and the Council (the valley), Pope of "turning prophetic" (next meeting in Assisi) and turning points (Melloni).

It is interesting that no one ever praises the Pope in his primary and fundamental task, which it is to be teacher of the faith and of the heresies oppugnatore. Perhaps you would find some altar, that embarrass admirers. How does Scalfari to say a huge amount of the genre? It is possible that he starts from a mistaken concept of sin. But there does not seem appropriate to examine the Scalfari written what he meant by "sin". I think this is enough to remember what is really sin, according to Catholic moral and therefore according to the Pope's thinking, who is the Master.

But what is sin? So let us say that sin is a free human act, with which the person knowingly and willingly does what is evil, ie that which is forbidden by divine law, which is owned by Practical Reason [2]. The infringement of human law is the crime or crime. The implementation of the divine command sorts the human act to the attainment of the ultimate goal of human action, who is God, supreme good of man. The human action is related to a plurality of purposes, based on the human nature and hierarchized between them, on top of which there is God. The will, in some of its acts, You can go directly to God. But even if the human act pursues an interim order, to be a morally good act, however it is necessary that the agent orders at least implicitly to God the interim order. Sin is when the will or rejects God directly, or, instead orient themselves to God as the ultimate goal, albeit through the intermediary of an intermediate end, He chooses as the ultimate end of an intermediate [The conversion to a commutable] implicitly rejecting God [Turning away from God]. Sin leaves the conscience and the will into a state of agitation or restlessness, which is called "fault". It can be removed using the discount or served their sentences, in the case of the crime, while, whether it is sin, which causes the loss of divine grace, sin is forgiven, ie canceled, and the fault is removed from the divine forgiveness, Rido che la Grazia, on condition of repentance and penance the sinner. The blame diminishes or completely lacking in cases where the subject acts or through ignorance or weakness or because overwhelmed by passions. If consciousness errs in good faith, the subject performs, with such consciousness, objectively bad action, but remains innocent, at least before God.

The notion of sin is a fundamental notion, intuitive, spontaneous and ineradicable of legal consciousness, natural and Christian morality. It enters the deposit of divine revelation, guarded and interpreted by the Supreme Pontiff. Because of this, The only imagine that the Pope can "abolish" the notion of sin and sin itself, idea is blasphemous, absolutely, grossly offensive of the pontifical magisterium.

It should be noted that the human will, in this life, He can not oppose evil nor can avoid sin. Everything is going to see what we mean by "evil" and "sin". This is therefore also in buonista, with the difference, respect the right man, that he is a sinner and fight against sin, and it has a rule for the practice of justice and severity, for which he curbs his sins and opposes the sins of others with a just severity. The feel-good, instead, devoid of this rule of justice and deceived precisely error buonista, that does not recognize the existence of sin, if someone opposes citing the existence of sin and the need to be punished, you imbestialisce and attacks him or if he gets the chance of having to Justice, not disposing of a right criterion of judgment, It is unleashed into violence and bullying. So the false mercy becomes cruelty.

To believe that all moral problems They can simply solve with good will, in a continuous progress - the "magnificent and progressive", on which satirized Giacomo Leopardi -, without the help of grace and adequate ascetic discipline, It is the tragic illusion, typical of rationalist moral, as liberalism and Freemasonry. But on the other hand, trust in divine mercy does not exempt from the struggle against sin and the duty to obey the law, who punishes evildoers. Indeed, coercion and the use of force with justice and moderation, at the right moment, It is necessary to curb the wicked and have an educational function.

That feel-good concept of sin which leads to the denial of sin is in some way within the general trend buonista, for which all basically are good and well-wishers. In this view there is a pantheism and then a latent atheism: the subject believes to be good, because after all he is God. villains, if anything, They are the other, that does not give my idea that all are good. Therefore, there is "consequences" of original sin. To sin and suffer falls in human nature. Death is natural. If nature is hostile, God has nothing to do. It is nature that is like that. All they saved. Who does evil, it is either ignorance or weakness. Sin seems bad for the individual, but actually it falls in the general order of the universe. Some even say that, since everything is God, everything is fine. Sin is not a bad thing true, but it is an imperfection. Sin is only a hiccup in the path of evolution. Everyone apologized and whoever does evil must not be punished, or correct, or threatened, but it must be left free and tolerated. We can not judge others by external criteria to their conscience, because that would be an imposition. Indeed, what is bad for us can be good for others. It is therefore necessary to see things from their point of view. There are no rules or universal and immutable laws, but only particular and concrete situations standards. Everyone is free to act according to his conscience. God always forgives and does not punish. There is no evil of guilt, but only penalty. Feelings of guilt are no signs that he has sinned, but they are simple to cure diseases with psychoanalysis. There are no bad people, but all have grace and save. In hell there is no one. The crime is explained by psychological predispositions (Lombroso) or environmental influences (Rousseau) or class economic conditions (Marx) or sexual orientation (Freud).

Analyzing the problem of hidden truth in error, it is natural to offer a suggestion to the Holy Father. On the other hand we observe that the large aberrations of the human mind, as for example what Scalfari attributes to Pope, I am never so false as not to cover a bit of truth and are never so absurd, not to receive some explanation, especially if born out of a fine mind and evil genius - from clever foolishness, you could say paradoxically - like that of Scalfari. Let us ask then how he may be come up with the idea balzana? On what basis or facts? Starting from what? We believe that in some way it can be put in relation with a defect in the preaching of the Pope on the subject of sin. Without being a feel-good, the Pope is dangerously close to the ideas of do-gooders. In his anxiety to be next to all, to welcome all and to go to all, especially the "discarded", Poors, the oppressed, the suffering, it is projected to the "suburbs", he is, as once it was said, "Too indulgent". They, Instead of moderating the feel-good trend already present in Vatican II, for a moderate recovery of discipline, regularity, observance, austerity and severity, which for a long time the Church feels the need in education, in the formation of the clergy, as in the pastoral, in the government of souls, Church and society, dad, I said, as they say, It is "too good", permissive and accondiscendente, the risk then go out in harsh attitudes with those who do not deserve them, according to the mechanism that I described before.

The Holy Father is too severe to the Lefebvre, too lenient towards the modernists. It is good to recognize the commonalities with the Lutherans, but also should correct their mistakes. It's good to recognize monotheism in the Qur'an, but it should also encourage Muslims to convert to Christ. It's good to recognize communism instance of social justice; but it should also condemn the atheistic materialism; It does well to exhort to welcome immigrants, but it should also invite the vigilance against terrorists, parasites and saboteurs; It does well to cultivate inter-religious dialogue, but it should also remember that Catholic Christianity is the highest of religions, the only error; Call it Bonino "great Italian", but it is more clear in the condemnation of abortion; It does well to exhort homosexuals to love yourself, but strongly condemns sodomy; peace is not achieved only through dialogue, but also with the moderate use of force; irregular families are not only families "wounds", but there are also those who wound, corrupt and scandalous.

Not enough to proclaim the truths of the gospel that please the world, but we must also announce those that displease. The Pope says that should not be flatterers: well, At that time, if you take them out of the way replacing them with competent employees, loyal and sincere. This would truly be a revolutionary Pope, a never before seen Pope, a Pope of reforms. In this way the Pope will take away any pretext to the nonsense of Scalfari and its "similar".

It is our sacred duty to defend the Successor of Peter, who you are required to be a master of wisdom and prudence. We can also expose Scalfari games, but we can not fail to take note that the Holy Father is manifested sometimes unwise. If you admit this, an army of faithful astray, wounded and grieved, they would ask us this question which would not be easy to answer: He admitted that Scalfari claims and write nonsense attributed to the Holy Father, who is receiving it and speaks to us, if not the Holy Father himself? And after Scalfari he has made certain shoot, How come, the relevant information organ of the Holy See, do not deny?

.

Varazze, 13 October 2017

.

.

_____________________

[1] He supports this thesis Humanity. The story of God, Queriniana, Brescia 1992, p.183.

[2] St. Thomas, QUESTION, I-II, q.91, a.2.

 

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

The New Compass Daily and the whores of the Gospel that "precede you into the kingdom of heaven". E’ given rise to a worse religion of Protestantism: the whoredom

/4 Comments/in /by

THE NEW BUSH DAILY WHORES AND GOSPEL THAT 'VI ABOVE IN THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN ". It WAS GIVEN BIRTH TO A NEW RELIGION OF THE WORST PROTESTANTISM: THE whoredom

.

Unfortunately in contemporary Catholicism has long threatened another parallel religion, which is that of whoredom. And this whoredom, a level of information, it is the paradigm The New Compass Daily, which we could be defined as a real magazine on-line weather democristiana.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

.

 

 

 

 

PDF print format article

.

.

«[…] And then the charisma is not preserved in a bottle of distilled water! Faithful to the charism does not mean "pietrificarlo", is the devil that "petrifies", do not forget! Faithful to the charism does not mean writing on parchment and put it in a picture. The reference to the legacy that has left Don Giussani can not be reduced to a museum of memories, of decisions, rules of conduct. Certainly it involves fidelity to tradition, but fidelity to tradition - said Mahler - "means keeping alive the fire and not worshiping the ashes". Don Giussani will never forgive you lost your freedom and you trasformaste in museum guides or worshipers of ash. Keep the fire burning the memory of that first meeting and be free!

[S.S. Francis I., speech in Communion and Liberation, 2015. Full text WHO]

.

.

It is not evil, he is alone … natura et gratia

I do not like talking about myself, my past nor my present private. I'm not a subject to be selfies published at every turn the pages whatsapp e Facebook, because the suitable place where "I manifesto" in public is from the pulpit of the church, where he is proclaimed and preached the Holy Gospel. And when I have to talk about myself, I must make a great effort, sometimes a real sacrifice, especially when it comes to telling at all edifying episodes of my past life.

Although I never had any connection neither training nor of belonging to 'The Work of God, which I very much appreciate the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, We respect this as the only truly Catholic institution in the disastrous panorama of ecclesiastical universities [cf. WHO], at the time she hits a very succinct answer given by the Holy Founder of, Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer - who also said bad words like me -, that to a young priest who is considered worthy to rise to certain ecclesiastical offices, He answered: "Remember that you became a priest to celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice, to administer the Sacraments of Confession and Grace relevant to your degree, to serve and build up the People of God. Because of this, did you become a priest ".

These words touched me deeply and that both shared, I who in the Church I have never aspired to anything, especially being aware that for certain roles - always left to others with deep joy -, I would by the grace of God qualities and skills that those who practice them so mediocre, They do not even distantly; and not have them either by the grace of God, nor for those gifts of nature, however, also related to the principle of natura et gratia [cf. Mt 25, 14-30].

The first lesson holy that I did since the beginning of formation for the priesthood, It derived from the manifest desires and high career aspirations nourished by a bishop. The lesson I drew was as follows: If the devil can take ambition, we can do anything he wants, first taking away the freedom of God's children, because then every sigh, action, human relationship and so on, It will be conditioned and aimed only to their wild ambitions. that bishop, it was an ambitious pathological, He never understood for giving me, through this his serious flaw, and saving the most valuable lesson of my future priestly life. It is sadly certain that one day he, received the Holy Sacrament of the Sick and Holy Viaticum, before expiring pronounce these last words: "Man, because that such and such and such other jerk were made cardinals, whereas I do not?”. E, said this, make up the ghost, and I will pray a lot for him, because I loved both the, while he spent his life to be surrounded by fawning pimps, keeping a great distance from those who affection and genuine reverence they would have told the truth, but most would never have betrayed, even if he has betrayed himself.

In the exercise of my sacred ministry, some times I have to take myself as an example, but it is clear: as an example almost always be negative. It so happened that during some homilies, addressing certain topical issues, strictly related to the words of the Holy Gospel proclaimed just before, He has reminded that they bring certain debauchery of life they place us as the Ferrari on the race track much of that mortal sin that I have traveled at full speed. Here then again, in the secrecy of the inner hole, during sacramental Confession, some young boy or girl who explained to me that it was' an important period of cohabitation test, before taking a major step like marriage ', in reply that that choice was the wrong path, I explained: "I do not think I do not know what you're talking about, because I'm not a priest came to eleven years in the seminary. Certain experiences took place before you, but above all more and worse than you. So I can explain on my own skin that a de-empowering wedding parody, It is pointless, for these reasons …".

Not to mention how severely I have dealt certain Mamas Catholic engaged, of those who tear their clothes on around the network The joy of love, or sacrilegious danger of Holy Communion for divorced and remarried, but at the same time they are justifying their son or their daughter who lives with his companion or the companion, because then it comes to "living together for good", or because "any time soon marry '. At this army holy mommies, to avoid that someone could reply "who knows, her priest, of certain realities?”, without going for the subtle I answered: "My mother, which it is really Catholic, when I was doing the pimp, or when in times of "seriousness" I was a partner jumping from one partner, he never allowed me to visit her together with some of my occasional ganze. And once, very sternly, mi said: "When you're married, then you can bring your wife, but your love I do not want to see or meet in my house ' ". I remained so bad and I felt offended at this point, who did not want to see and feel my mother for several years. But my mother, that a Christian conscience have it for real, as I had my late father, He never accepted my debauchery, rather than lose his son. Dissoluteness instead, rather than lose their children, They are accepted by the army of holy mommies which then vent from one blog thundering against "concubines" and "adulterers", to which the "infamous" The joy of love He would open the doors to the Most Holy Eucharistic Communion. What in any case is not true, as we have already explained our Fathers de The Island of Patmos [see WHO e WHO]. These people are going crazy for the electronic network, They are in large numbers mostly frustrated women, if we go to investigate, we find that they have sons and daughters living together peacefully and husbands who made merry more or less in the light of the sun with the young office secretary. Here then by reaction, after having thundered against "adultery" and "concubines", begin to tie "heavy burdens and lay them on men's shoulders, but they don't want to move them even with a finger " [cf. Mt 23,4]. And while imposing "burdens on people's shoulders", They do not care about the fact that their daughters not even limited to making life partners in "civil unions", but they live and behave like real whores. Of course, none of those who read on the internet some invective against "adultery" and "concubines" written by this race of people, You can see the exploits of their daughters and sons, maybe even why, to see the work of some offspring always so strict and zealous Catholics on the skin of other people's children, rather than on the sites of Vera&Temple Apostolic Tradition We should go on porn sites. And if anyone wants to see the real riot of remarried divorcees, di Cheese unlike married that no one calls in certain cases "adultery" and "concubines" but "precious benefactors of our protection work of the true faith and the true teaching ', enough that you facing in certain environments and improperly called the so-called Vera&Temple Apostolic Tradition, including Lefebvre, given that the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X have never puzzati the money of those many "adultery" and "concubines" who have real or imagined-quarters of the old nobility and that melt like snow in the sun, together with their wallets, before to aromatic smoke of incense and magic of the Latins. If anything, introducing himself to the solemn liturgy Old Catholic Churches, seventy substantially exceeded, with their "nurse" that does not resemble at all to how bad talentata Tina Pica [cf. WHO], but which seem to climb out of an erotic film. Or come to the so-called "mass always" with their lovable twenty-five year-old granddaughter, just arrived fresh and beautiful from Kiev. That and much more speaks volumes that the Pharisees were less hypocritical of heretic and schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay, the one who very filial corrects the Supreme Pontiff, but it is careful not to correct many of the benefactors of his fraternity, and especially those many generous and Brazilian and North American members of the ultra right, who collect divorces with the ease with which a collector collects stamps. But on the other hand, I also said the Emperor Vespasian when he was facing reprimand for having put the fee sull'orina: «Money, non're » [money does not stink, cf. WHO].

But back to me and to my debauchery to arrive later to the heart of an entirely different matter ... only twenty years after the death of my father, when I was already a priest, I was told that my father, died just 56 year old, He prayed and offered him during his illness his sufferings for their return to the faith of his son, that refused to even walk past a church for ten years. But wanting, the suo time, I did worse: I said that even on the baptismal registry - the one where he is now annotated my priestly ordination -, it was noted that I did not belong to the Catholic Church.

Not that seeks to justify that my gesture villain, But it is worth pointing out that he was a juvenile reaction completely wrong - but always a reaction -, to the truly devastating priestly figures that I had known and with whom I had to do on several occasions, form me up to the idea that the Catholic clergy there were only a few mele marce, but it was getting hard to find a single healthy apple. And all this generated in me particular pain and discomfort, because as a child, then as a teenager, I had had from God the grace and privilege of coming into contact with truly holy priests, I mention all of them a particularly well-known to the great Catholic public: Father Divo Barsotti.

I know so well what it means, and how young people in particular can run forever from the Church, when instead of priestly virtue models, They are presented to them before certain alleged sculettanti Priests entered the College of the wickedness of those bishops who in the late seventies and early eighties found themselves with deserts seminars, to the point that often fill them queers and checchine, dive e divine …

Of all this and worse ancòra, But the fault is not of the reigning Pontiff, who started his pontificate, even after four decades of devastating choices made by its Supreme Predecessors, or by those to whom they have entrusted, or of which they trusted, while on one hand the priests competed in every piece of crap, to the point that often, most were pigs, Most were career under different pontificates now much regretted by those who have given life to a mythical past history embalmed, but in truth it never existed. And while our clergy became increasingly morally impossible, the document in the document do not hesitate to get shots of morality in the bedrooms of our faithful with sling goldsmith, to measure the deeds and misdeeds. And these are not my opinions ungenerous, least of all "subversive opinions" against the Catholic morality and who know that I myself practice; the one just described is the history of the Church over the last forty years, a story written and documented act of act, Official speech of official speech, many of which reminds us of that terrible warning: "They tie up heavy burdens and lay them on men's shoulders, but they don't want to move them even with a finger " [cf. Mt 23,4].

If several times the grace of God has used me to resume and bring him several of these traumatized and driven from feats of certain priests, maybe it's because, for life experience, I could understand fully what they saw and what they felt, a result which had developed reactive rejection against the Catholic Church and especially its clergy plunged to historic lows moral. And while the moral situation of the clergy was now precipitated, Holy Church of God ruled by the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II was committed to reiterate its categorical "no condoms", but at the same time ordering a homosexual priest after another, up to allow the development of a real epidemic frocismo clerical, Finally paid in the United States with the diocese into bankruptcy because of subissate judgments of damages to victims of harassment, or until the collapse of the Church of Ireland deluged with scandals truly unspeakable sexual. It was above all from this point of view that the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI faced a moral crisis of the clergy of proportions at times frightening, while the reigning Pope has inherited all the after-effects of a situation of total collapse, It is now come to be missing for a long time the trusted collaborators, faithful and capable, essential to keep up a good reign and to make this really.

Often, talking to people re-converted to Catholicism, I said and explained that the experience of the Blessed Apostolo Paolo or of Blessed Vescovo Agostino, are not, as it is often thought and is believed, of isolated cases, unique and exceptional. Far from it: I am a paradigm. For this reason I have narrated these lines between the synthesis of my personal story and my subsequent radical change of life; I did it to show that this corresponds to the dynamics of the shock of the Blessed Apostolo Paolo on the Road to Damascus, or the conversion of the Blessed Vescovo Agostino, behind which there were the prayers of his mother St. Monica, that behind many of our conversions or re-conversions there were many holy mothers Monica. And as Saul of Tarsus was called Paul, and Aurelio Thagaste to Augustine, with the baptism that I am called by my parents Stefano Maria, before my ordination I asked to be able to call Ariel, what does it mean Lion of God, having considered - if I'm not wrong in analysis and interpretation of the signs of the Holy Spirit -, that to me, Father gave, just he wanted what was imprinted in the name I assumed before the sacred ordination. In the economy of salvation, There is in fact the painstaking monaco that is silent, and the lion roaring. A me, He would have liked the seclusion of the Charterhouse and withdrawal from the world in silence and total concealment, but I wished I, God did not want him; and a choice of selfish pleasure, You can never be called a vocation. It can not silence those who in fact is called to roar, He can not roar who is called to be quiet.

The key word in all this talk, I repeat is the word 'coherence'. Or as I wrote earlier: if a person has not been and is not at consistently in their own sinful choices, riafferrata will never be recovered and the grace of God and then be consistent in faith.

The converted or re-converted, never hesitate, without discomfort, to bring himself as an example, launching without any shame, to the many light and superficial Catholics, This clear message: «Dear son, but if I did I who I was in his time a citizen of Sodom and Gomorrah honorary, not make you want?».

This also involves another aspect: the ability to admit, to declare and publicly reiterate a radical change of views. Because a conversion or re-conversion, this also involves: a radically different way of thinking and to face reality and life itself. In fact, if I were a bishop - it is an example of purely academic, of course -, cost of closing of parishes for lack of priests, I would look good from consecrating Priests in the Holy Order of the subjects that after years of seminary, changed only the exterior surface appearance, these were and what were. Who in fact she reaches the Priesthood remaining as such, He can not get through the Sacrament of a new character that turns and forms for life. That's why no one is ever occurred to you to appoint the rector of a seminary or of electing a bishop's seat. And they were right not to do it, because I do not fill the Church of garbage, I empty the Church by trash. And a rector empty-seminar or a bishop-garbage man nobody cares, even the Church "revolutionary" of Francis I. And that being said I want to be clear that with these words I do not self-nominated, who knows me knows that is not so.

Unfortunately in today's Catholicism hath been threatened by another parallel time religion: the whoredom. Of this whoredom, a level of information, paradigm is something that magazine on-line the indomitable and diehard politicians de The New Compass Daily, which we could be defined as a real magazine vetero Democrat.

Changing times, people and situations, but some subjects are always there, with them bishops reference working to ooze poison behind the scenes, to act as if we were always in 'italietta Democrat fifties, where to be hired as a janitor in a public school was decisive letter of recommendation from the parish priest, to be hired as a clerk in a city municipality office, that of the Bishop. And when they approached the elections, not a few bishops summoned all the clergy not to the necessary training courses, or to instruct them on how best to build the People of God, but to turn them into election propagandists. And for weeks, from church pulpits, instead of the explanations to the Holy Gospel, They were heard verbose election rallies. there, i bishops reference of the Director of The New Compass Daily, still dream of this, which is to say: like dreaming the calessino driven by donkey while the missiles flying toward the Moon.

Before the charges of my whoredom facing The New Compass Daily, not just as a reaction to the outrage, even because, in the words of one of their vescovetto politician far reference when we had to defend Silvio Berlusconi and his brothels in the open: "The outrage is not a Christian sentiment". So it's not that reacts with indignation, but with the truth, which it is always objective, never subjective, because the subjective truth is not the truth, but it is their opinion, which as such always leaves things as they are.

As of March 2013 following, The New Daily Compass it is more papist amply Pope. Making a sigh on Pope Francis I would have been unthinkable. Several signatures who attempted a veiled criticism and delicate expression on the pastoral style of the reigning Pontiff, They felt respond by the provincial secretary of the Christian Democrats failed, ie Riccardo Cascioli, that "The editorial policy does not allow any expression also indirectly critical of this pontificate". And it is clear: the living witnesses, kicking and equipped in such a sense of good memory, there is no shortage at all, in case the applicant intends to protest, but above all to deny.

At the time,, his The New Compass every day He wrote the sociologist Massimo Introvigne, which incidentally is an excellent specialist in the sociology of religion, and founder of the worthy CESNUR [cf. WHO, WHO]. Each article in which he extolled the wonders of this pontificate, Massimo Introvigne was attacked by all the Catholic fronds that showed concern for pastoral certain styles of Pope Francis I. There were even blog they created dedicated pages of teasing more or less headed 'daily introvignata », and on to follow.

You can then ask the penalty: What happened to this well-deserving magazine, legitimately criticizing today Future, The Osservatore Romano, the closest collaborators of the Pope, but above all the pastoral decisions of the Supreme Pontiff? Which, the central nucleus of "conversion" which has led to such a radical change, but above all to discover that critical sense in which between 2013 and the 2014, The New Compass Daily, defenestrò several employees as deemed insufficiently papist, or as we would say today Bergogliani ? How could it happen that the director of The New Compass Daily, yesterday as recommended today behind the scenes by the same bishop - namely that between a phone and the other on Eurostar He hoped that the reigning Pontiff soon reach the Father's house, then pumping below, always behind the scenes, several signatories Correction filial -, went to meet this metamorphosis? Why indeed compared, the Methamorphosis Ovid, They are likely to be just a joke, together with Praise of Folly Erasmus of Rotterdam.

Let us see what happened to induce the then ultra-papist New Daily Compass to discover suddenly that even a Supreme Pontiff, if necessary can be criticized, with all the good grace of the case and provided it does not put in question his legitimate authority. It happened this: In the 2015 the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, He has awarded two sound and well-deserved slap in the movement Communion and Liberation, through a very strong and very severe speech that invite you to read everything in full, because then you will understand the origin of the sudden "conversion" to the freedom of the children of God de The New Compass Daily and its director [cf. see text WHO].

After the papal speech occurred before a conversion, then a transformation. E, suddenly, we have witnessed the metamorphosis that today we have before: the publication of correction filial passed for pure duty of chronicle, to the next article by Antonio Livi it ​​was like a new mail patch on an old dress [cf. Mt 9, 14-17], as well as both offensive to the intelligence of the man who wrote it is the intelligence of those who, and in species canonists and theologians, they read. To follow up with attacks targeting to Andrea Tornielli, guilty of being papist and so-called Bergogliano.

I state that I am a friend for many years by Andrea Tornielli, as are Antonio Socci and Marco Tosatti. It is three different people, with a dissimilar approach to what is referred to as the journalistically Bergoglio phenomenon.

Andrea Tornielli is a person who by his character and professional style moves cautiously, and in him I never had heard the approach based on opportunism turncoats that often is challenged by those that Gabbana have turned to the right and upside down, but not only, because after you have turned and turned, they even dyed with different colors, as did Riccardo Cascioli to the direction of The New Compass Daily.

Antonio Socci It is a Christian Fire, a passionario and in many respects a man of God went through trials and suffering do not wish on anyone, in which not only he kept his faith, but he strengthened, giving an example in this sense certainly not insignificant. His position in respect of this pontificate is very critical, and is its legitimate right to be critical, criticizing the hard way, sometimes ruthless, certain choices of the Pope, without ever having been disrespectful to his Augusta person and without ever questioning his authority.

Marco Tosatti It is a great lord in delicacy and expressive spirit, he is puzzled before certain pastoral decisions of the Supreme Pontiff, but his style is different and everything marked in the manner of an "old" gentleman of journalism.

All three of these professionals, in their diversity, They are characterized by an element: are men of faith, husbands and fathers specimens, models of Christian family life, People who really love the Church and even the papacy.

I can estimate and have relationships with animated people from totally opposite feelings, relative to the present ecclesial and ecclesiastical situation, that as I have often written is in a state of decay and crisis without historical precedent. But I can not feed esteem for the obvious turncoats banner of "nothing happened ”; who do not find something better to do that explicitly or implicitly give the turncoats to Andrea Tornielli, who runs an information server, Vatican Insider, that makes no opinion or analysis, But as news and comments, when it does not just give you news and just.

The latest attack in order of series addressed to Andrea Tornielli in those days was a real falsification. An editorialist The Corriere della Sera, Gian Antonio Stella, which it is a great journalist but not an expert in church and ecclesiastical matters, supportandosi just for this on an article written by Andrea Tornielli last year, He wrote exact words:

.

«[…] The Catholic fundamentalists who days ago, the anniversary of the Battle of Lepanto, they said the rosary against immigrants, in particular Islamic (including Syrians fleeing by the ferocity of Assad and cutthroats Isis), pretend to ignore that "their" Papa never let go of certain principles. First: the Christian duty BUSINESS. May. He remembered a year ago the Vatican correspondent Andrea Tornielli in a piece titled "Immigrants, as well as Poland "buries" Giovanni Paolo II " [A text. Tornielli 10.15.2016, WHO, text G.A. Star 10.10.2017, WHO].

.

The reaction falsante de The New Compass Daily was an article so titled: "Because the power defames the Poles helped by certain Catholics". Article in which, starting with the title same, Andrea Tornielli has slipped into a cauldron of accusations, without ever he has mocked the Polish Catholics, in the Christian celebration of the victory over the Moslems at Lepanto 7 October 1571, They have organized the recitation of the Holy Rosary on the Polish territory boundaries, with the participation of about one million faithful [text B. Frigerio of 12.10.2017, WHO].

Now you understand well that the lines and behind the lines of The New Compass Daily, that ultra-papist that was between 2013 and the 2014, It has become critical-sour day after the reigning Pontiff has given up two healthy sganascioni to Communion and Liberation, It is not that it did not happen exactly nothing, but it happened very, species in inconsistency and consequent arrogance towards other professionals of journalism. for no one, slab column The New Compass Daily that bestows implied or express licenses of turncoats in right and left, ever he told: "We changed my mind". What not only legitimate, because as I think I have explained in my skin and in my own life of past debauchery and deadly sins, The change view is what often saving, sometimes essential for a true journey of faith. In fact, if I myself had not radically changed opinion at the time, Today I would be a different kind of man, but above all I would not be a priest of Christ.

Therefore I say in all serenity that the slap given by the Supreme Pontiff to Communion and Liberation, in addition to being entirely deserved, has helped more mice come into the open, from Riccardo Cascioli that makes fleas to other colleagues annotating them with great fall of professional style as the snipers, ie snipers. Now, I do not know if the director of The New Compass Daily he did as the undersigned military service, or if it was reformed to visiting lever, or if it is declared pacifist and did alternative civilian service passing the time playing with videogames, in any case it is not necessary to have studied The Art of War to know that sniper, the sniper, especially after the bloody war in the former Yugoslavia, It has become synonym for coward. The snipers on the buildings of Sarajevo, shooting at unarmed civilians, including women and children, often deliberately hitting behind, and they were usually padded euphoric drugs; and when the euphoria passed, They became even worse and more bloody.

Here are described mice that the Pope Francis I did come out with two slaps. It is opportunistic and inconsistent mice, of low alloy politicians who represent the paradigm of mice of a religion entirely new and much worse than that Protestantism brought to life by a schism and a heresy born from the Christian core work of Martin Lutero. And this new religion, that is not born precisely from any Christian nucleus, It is the whoredom.

It is to these people that our Lord Jesus Christ says: "The prostitutes will precede the kingdom of heaven" [cf. Mt 21, 38-32]. What this Riccardo Cascioli should have explained in great detail his bishop of reference, what, If the Pope Francis I had been made a cardinal, He would have incinerated at the stake anyone who had longed for this pontificate, instead wish the reigning Pontiff soon to pull the bucket talking on the phone in the crowd from the first class of a Eurostar.

And if these are all mice today madness that the Pope Francis I did jump out from behind those scenes where for decades have worked to damage the Church, well I tell you: even though I have been and am critical of many pastoral choices of the Holy Father - as demonstrated irrefutably many of my writings -, for just about to have littered the papal rodenticide, I would be ready to shout, already while it is still alive ... saint now!

Last note is style is of a professional nature: our online magazine The Island of Patmos It reached in these days of October the twelve million visits. Our work, it's all free, however it involves high management costs, as is the case when working with means, instruments, programs, server-provider business and so on. Always and now we have entrusted to the providential and free charity of Readers, that until now have supported us, first of all in our full and complete freedom. But when you have certain sponsor or certain patrons, You always end up on the unfortunate pay book whose, in the end, reaches amounts what to say and what not to say.

At the New Daily Compass today by the snipers to the others, we want to give this lesson in style and especially of Christian freedom, I saw the way he turned as if nothing had gabbana, after the first two slaps data from the Supreme Pontiff, a righteous and holy about, Movement of Communion and Liberation.

It is not by chance that - it's just a question -, have imposed a change of editorial line their lenders?

The emperor Vespasian, stating Pecunia non olet, he was wrong, because the money, in truth, always stink, when you buy your freedom and when will make your Christian conscience in the same way a rubber band that drives an accordion portfolio.

.

the Island of Patmos, 12 October 2017

.

.

Video of the speech of Pope Francis I

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.