“love joy” – This time Andrea Grillo jump even higher: by Caffara Cardinal strikes ahead of Cardinal Müller who would trouble reading and understanding of the papal documents

– theological discussions –

«The joy »

ANDREA GRILLO SKIP THIS TIME STILL HIGHER: BY CARDINAL CAFFARRA PASS ATTACK OF CARDINAL MULLER THAT WOULD HAVE PROBLEMS OF READING AND UNDERSTANDING OF DOCUMENTS PONTIFICAL

.

When the end of the sixties of the twentieth century there was the issue of contraceptives, Paul VI allowed and encouraged wide and long discussion prior. But then, with his Encyclical Human life, It is expressed with clarity and richness of arguments. The Pope Francis document love joy It does not give a solution that shine for clarity, something that we have repeatedly expressed in our articles The island of Patmos. Yet it is not impossible, with a careful exegesis, come to understand the mens Pope: remarried divorcees are excluded from Eucharistic Communion. The only point of love joy, that might suggest a change in the law, could be known 351, that alludes to the sacraments to divorced and remarried ...

.

.

Author John Cavalcoli OP
Author
John Cavalcoli, OP

.

.

PDF format Print article

.

.

the interview with the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, of Rudder

The lacking intellectual honesty Grillo in the operation is not so much ask doctrinal questions - about a point, as I said, even it seems to be right -, but the doctrinal controversy is rather a pretext, stretched one hand to discredit the role of the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the other to damage precisely that Pope which poses as a defender, giving bait hatred of Lefebvre, and reinforcing the false image of a modernist Pope, with the consequence of to gas the modernists increasing bewilderment and scandal of the good faithful.

.

Andrea Grillo honors intelligent
the theologian Andrea Grillo, picture from a magazine published by Edizioni San Paolo [see WHO]

But any Catholic with open eyes He knows that it makes no sense to present the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith as opposed to the Pope, When these has its own institutionally in him the main contributor in the main office of the Successor of Peter, that is to confirm the brethren in the truth of the Gospel.

.

The points touched by Grillo are three: first, the issue of sexual abstinence are divorced and remarried, second, the question of ' "analogy" between the husband-wife Pauline and the union between Christ and the Church; third, disobedience of certain bishops to the wording of 'love joy.

.

.

To read the entire article click below:

.

17.02.2017 John Cavalcoli, OP - ANDREA GRILLO SKIP THIS TIME EVEN MORE UP: BY CARDINAL CAFFARRA PASS ATTACK OF CARDINAL MULLER THAT WOULD HAVE PROBLEMS OF READING AND UNDERSTANDING OF TEXTS PONTIFICAL

.

.

Cat and mouse

.

.

.

.

.

.

About isoladipatmos

6 thoughts on "“love joy” – This time Andrea Grillo jump even higher: by Caffara Cardinal strikes ahead of Cardinal Müller who would trouble reading and understanding of the papal documents

  1. It seems to me that, reading without malice and in its proper context the interview with Cardinal Müller, We can understand quite well the use of the expression reason “vague analogy”. The context is that of confusing interpretations, forced or simply partisan of Laetitia Amoris; addressing ideally, and controversially, the propagators of such readings, it is as if the Prefect of the Congregation say: “And’ AL true that speaks of “imperfect analogy”, but that does not mean it is a “mere vague analogy”. The use of the adjective “simple” and strengthening it in function by the Prefect seems eloquent. Whether the Cardinal expressing so it was a bit’ reckless or inadvertent, could be. But even the greatest caution can not protect us from those who “He does not want to understand”. Come lei ben sa.

  2. thank p. Cavalcoli for the article that masterfully covers the dispute between the theologian and Cardinal. Mueller.
    But I would like to respond to the last paragraph of p. Cavalcoli, one in which recommends two things to the prefect: limited to interviews and agree with the Pope answers to be given by official documents.

    Sorry, father, but she really believes that Mueller did not try to ask the pope to dot the 'i'? I think the interview to 'Rudder’ It is precisely the proof that his attempt to clarify the pope some steps have failed. Yes, because if there had been planning a motu proprio (how he had envisaged her in her article) or something resembling an official clarification the prefect would have never made such a clear interview, net and also quite tough. I believe that Mueller has just released their interview because, in consciousness, He could no longer keep silent about a situation where, and we see, into permanent stall.

    Thank you again to all the explanations

    1. Dear Reader.

      We can possibly discuss the contents of the interview in question, but not on the consciousness motives that have possibly thrust, because those we do not know and can not know, nor can we know if the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has done “attempts” with the Supreme Pontiff; and if he made them, we do not know how and on what terms.
      For any theological disputation, we have to rely on facts and not on assumptions.

      1. some…I share the idea that mine is an assumption, to think that the prefect has attempted to sit at a 'theological table'.

        but I believe that we can similarly call, ie supposition, one that manifests p. Cavalcoli. The father hopes (better: recommended) that the prefect, instead externalize thoughts, You are put at a table with the Pope to clarify, then thinking that it is doing. It is assumed that too?
        Such as the Father puts Cavalcoli seems that the prefect likes doing the most maverick rather than settle the doctrinal question.

        it is still my opinion acceptable or not…always respectful of that of others

  3. = Although de jure flawless that touches the prefect to agree with the Pope , Today He who uses make statements and speeches bagful, Freewheeling, and far from perspicuous, It is not the prefect.
    = The spousal union of Christ and the Church can not fail to be true and perfect. The human marriage has with it an analogy of attribution (that can not be very far away) because it is an act of nature coated legal forms, conversely Christian marriage is a great mystery, analogous to proportion to the Model Divine, because the family becomes a “small Church” who begets children for the Kingdom of God. Of the claim here (past?) the Church of having absolute power over marriage law.
    = The chirped del Grillo Andrea is getting annoying (by comparison the Beppe Grillo is a champion of modesty and moderation) , but the real tragedy is that the latter have the task not so secret to prepare the devastation and the repeal of the Mass.

    1. Cricket (Andrea) It can prepare the devastation and the repeal of commissioning (assuming it's what you want to do)….God will not let him…neither to him nor to the whole world if he wanted…I dare say: pain of death!

      we have seen what happened to the absurd Antiochus' Epimane’ (as ironically they called the Jews)…we hope that those events do as magister vitae. mamma mia: It seems to be in the church dell'ognuno face as he pleases! how can we get to this point?

Leave a Reply