Whores & paraculi, the correct etymology of words. When is instead the correct words become insults? Example: proselytism is not a dirty word, but a prerequisite of evangelization
Latest posts by father ariel (see all)
- Mary Magdalene «The apostle of the apostles», from a morning meditation for the Discalced Carmelite nuns - 22 July 2024
- History and Gospel. Those who don't believe in God and mock him always end up believing in everything - 6 July 2024
- Aldo Moro at the seaside in a jacket and tie, bishops and priests in their underwear, we “rigid priests” called “Pharisees” e “formalist” if we dare to appeal to priestly dignity - 27 June 2024
Dear friends who reject the crude and vulgar words, your sensitivity is respectable and meritorious, and nobody has the right to neglect or despise, otherwise in Ariel's father even more than in other contemporary defenders of the faith “indignation makes verse”(Giovenale). And rightly he lists an epitome of small errors and horrors we come from flood victims.
And to stay only in the limited field of language, the harshest words, basest, more charges of lying, of contempt and hatred, today are spread planetariamente, by demolition, by stravolgitori, by the lords of language by proxy agents and inspiration of the father of lies.
So the Bishop Bartolomeo de la Casas, who tells us of the conquistadors fighting dogs that were chasing the Indians (There is also a book 250 pages that talk about) to which they gave the children to eat would be a gross forger.
If you say you!
About Aztec
It means that the Indian genocide (I studied at the University interviews also to the last exponents dedi natives of North America) It is an invention of anticlerical. The inhabitants of the New World (I miss God's creatures) They are so cold dead.
If la'vessi knew not avtrei lost time studying
Good to know. But cominciatre scrubbing gold robbed the ceiling of Santa Maria Maggiore and then to return it. It's not your stuff, It comes from dell'encomienda exploitation do not think the “mom heavenly” O “Mommy” according to St. Pius the very gradisca.
Elsewhere kikognostico call me and as such I sign
kikognostic
There are Italian authors that tell our soldiers, in the thirties of the twentieth century, during the African colonial campaign of Victor Emmanuel III and Benito Mussolini, they are given to acts of this kind:
1. They tore babies from their mothers' arms and crushed his head under his boots;
2. They are throwing babies into the air and were playing target practice with guns;
3. They gutted with knives pregnant and had fun out tiragli children;
4. etc … etc …
And all things that are written about certain books and presented as evidence and historical truth.
While in the late sixties and early seventies, Needy sinister eternal anti-fascism, spread these strictly historical news, Africans now elderly of the former Italian colonies, They belied by declaring that never, Italian soldiers, They had done such things and indeed, were all remembered for their kindness towards women, Children and the elderly.
Then?
While all this is written the books and publications, and at the time I'm referring, He was taught by historians and political scientists from socio-chairs of universities.
You can imagine the worst of Italian soldiers of the thirties he does things like that?
P.S.
There are historic, professors and books that claim today that the Holy Inquisition, in the Middle Ages, He would kill about thirty million women.
The idiots who believe these tall tales, they should just ask yourself a question: how much he was, in the XIII / XIV century the whole European population?
And even that is written in books and taught in universities.
It is effective in capturing the interest of the player boater
Not only: ago also come to light certain hypocrites.
I too find it repugnant vulgar words and sometimes inappropriate images with which seasoned your articles.
My dear, I find repugnant, for instance, Christological and pneumatological heresy that for years, Enzo Bianchi, It is sowing around cathedrals throughout Italy, invited to pontificate from the Bishops, that as teachers and custodians of the doctrine should preserve the People of God from error, certainly not invite heretics to speak to the People of God.
But, Bianchi, makes no reference, in an article by a certain cut – and I repeat a certain cut – in terms such as paraculi e whores.
Therefore go’ okay, or better: you can say heresies from the pulpit of a cathedral, in front of which, if a replica priest, "Bianchi has just broken my balls there», the result is that Bianchi is welcome, the priest is rather vulgar improvident.
… and I was hoping that we would be saved by the wisdom of God's People, that deceived, that I was …
Dear Gio,
I am a priest, not the public defender, That said I must tell you some things about the father Ariel've known for years.
Father Ariel is really a gentleman, and not even know where hotels vulgarity.
His way of porgersi, express themselves and relate, I assure you, more reminiscent of the aristocratic, not at the longshoreman.
There are literary expressions “impact” or effect” needed, sometimes, to shake and make people think, Jesus used them lying, as a father Ariel reminds another scandalized who commented, certain Alda.
Therefore, if you want me well count among the vulgar, I can tell you, for instance, that, lately, talking with my bishop, I stated: “They are more vulgar certain women in our churches recite the Hail Mary certain whores flying the sidewalk”.
This refers to the fact that while a prostitute, lately, She gave birth and immediately gave up for adoption a child leaving the hospital, and not with a light heart, the captain of the recitation of the rosary, woman with a venomous viper's tongue, recently you personally brought the granddaughter of years 17 to make an illegal abortion by a midwife, because she could not have an abortion in the hospital for the good name “Catholic” of the family, since God, alla mammana, evidently not seen.
The famous speech of the mote and the beam that tells the Gospel.
I'm sorry you, so lapidary, not have, against the other, minimum in consideration the fact that, Ariel's father, among other things, a senior writer, with an expressive command of the Italian language that few, today, They can be said to have. E, dismiss it so, with two rows, it's not right, and it is not, above all, realistic.
As a priest and former assistant of various consecrated communities, I would like to respond to what Alda, and how much it is, the profound vulgarity which I found in the areas of consecrated, but there are times, situations and realities, on which it should not drop a veil, but a boulder, why not answer, because I can not and will not, But the invitation to question what circulates, profoundly vulgar, in the world of consecrated, before which we priests, well that we are not in that morally and do not pass well, are, the confrontation, true beginners …
Reverend Father Alessio,
She is taking fireflies for lanterns. I never dreamed of
question the quality 'moral, theological and literary Father Ariel, whose articles I read always very volenteri.
As a child, my parents taught me, in words and example, to use a pure language, something that as an adult I'm trying to instill in my children.
Sara 'maybe' cause I have a childlike faith, out of step with the times, sara 'maybe' cause for the Church that is the linguistic rule of peripheral areas, but here nell'opuscoletto of preparation for confession under 6 Commandment reads, against the other, “Have I been pure in thoughts, words and actions?”
Now if a wretched sinner like me kneeling in general use before a priest to beg forgiveness of these sins, should not give the priest the first good example?
What was the need to season the article published on this site long ago with the red-light images of the Pompeii frescoes?
Of course, today and 'easy to accuse someone of hypocrisy and if then brings up the plank and the speck, I just have to humbly ask forgiveness and imploring his blessing…
If they have informed me well, Also San Bernardino of Siena in his sermons he did not use exactly the language schoolgirl….
… but educanda!
Just read some, for example when he gets angry with the relic of a certain miraculous milk of the Blessed Virgin Mary and so to follow, It seems to read a precursor of the Friar Cipolla Giovanni Boccaccio.
Thanks father Ariel.
It's always a pleasure to read. This upset the Church and unrecognizable his work invariably comforts me.
Let me tell Alda: the offense at the Roman language of the priest or the criminal actions of Ariel cardenal electric in recent days in favor of the community center with anarcocomunista please of the pope?
Ps. Beautiful citation of the sixteenth century Dominican. Meriterebbe a treaty apart from the work (heroic and little known by many Catholics) Montesinos, Las Casas and De Vitoria (the latter the founder of international law).
Dear Brother,
They do not usually comment on electronic sites, but this time your short essay, linguistically written with "the smell of the sheep" to boot township, He was quite intrigued and amused.
I welcome your approach: It is effective in capturing the interest of the player in the boater the vast sea the electronic network; It helps us not to give in to discouragement and gloom in considering the general confusion of St. Peter's ship and to react with Tuscan spirit, to St. Philip Blacks; It is an example of application preclaro aura maximum: "I do not take them seriously, take them for a ride " [N.d.R. see WHO] that I now practice in my small (while seeking to reject the temptation of complacency).
About "smell of the sheep": I think nothing but one of the many slogans, inconsistent and "imaginative" (in sessantottino sense), by which we are afflicted and led astray in this unfortunate ecclesial era. I know of no biblical and patristic basis for a pseudoteologia "cacosmetica" (κακὴ ὀσμή = stinks); even Jesus Christ, in chapter 10 the Gospel according to John, not even remotely dream of venturing into this language, given that the sheep – When they enclosed the fold – not exactly give off a pleasant smell; but apparently some "pastors" today have only seen the sheep odorless some Christmas crib. On the contrary, the blessed Apostle Paul writes: "For we are before God the aroma of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing; to one a fragrance from death to death and the other a fragrance from life to life " (2Color 2, 15 – 16). At this rate, certain "imaginative" bishops will the "updated" packaging sacred chrism is not a pleasant balm (according to tradition), but with “Eau de mouton - brebis galeuse = perfume mutton – black sheep", to have new bishops, new priests and confirmed more and more "goats".
Rather than concionar of "smell of the sheep", They should care for many fragrant pretini, who waste good money on perfume for his dapper personalino always expensively dressed to secular fashion and leave in their wake a strong odor of Paraculo (in the original sense of the term), how spiritual edification of the Catholic flock you can imagine.
With regard to proselytism, a way of warning cry, sketch an observation that should be more detailed. I think just the blessed Apostle Paul is one of the main victims of the prevailing modernism. The mere reading of Acts illustrates the fact that he was dedicated nothing more than to "make disciples", "to teach", "Preach" that Jesus is the Christ and the only Savior of all, according to the mission entrusted by the Risen Lord to his Church (CF. Mt 28, 19 – 20; 16, 15. 20; LC 24 46 – 48). Entered into a City, He not impiantava no cafeteria or hospital, not waiting for quiet that his philanthropic activities arouse questions in the other and then presented as a Christian, but at once he preached in the synagogues and in the streets, explicitly calling to faith and paying in person for persecution unleashed against the Jews. Today, the Church leaders censurerebbero, accusing it of proselytism deplorable and divisive action! But how is this reconciled with the dogma of apostolic character of the Holy Church?
The rest, among innumerable heretical nonsense hitherto heard, lately we have also the following annoverarne (He trumpeted shamelessly on the banks of the Po in Turin, with the complicity of the Archbishop Metropolitan competent): if he had known homo-affective couples (?!), St. Paul would not have written Rom 1, 24 – 32; which is equivalent to denying that the Apostle is a Doctor inspired by the Holy Spirit, but rather a poor fool not updated! Be careful and those parts, because the Apostle of the Gentiles has the iconographic attribute a sword in his hand; saw the temper that distinguished him, If you decide to use it, some head buggy-priestly episcopal fall ...
Rev.,
congratulations, congratulations, congratulations !
And lucky those who may have to deal with a priest like her.
His is a true and proper keynote.
When I hear, and when I read, the words of some brothers, I am deeply heartened and built, and I tell myself: we are in bad condition, undoubtedly, but it is not all completely lost.
When someone mentions the “Proclaiming the Gospel” in support of his argument against proselytizing, or he does not understand what he reads or is in bad faith.
Excuse me but I Ariel father of a consecrated a similar own language can not stand it! ?
…then avoid to read certain pages of the Holy Gospels, because if you read them, in this case it is not clear – or perhaps it has never been explained – the grossly offensive and insulting extent that involved turn to high dignitaries and members of the priestly caste words like these:
"Publicans and harlots go into the kingdom of heaven" [CF. Mt 21, 23-27] which translated means: the whores and the loan sharks are better than you.
"Race of vipers" [cf. Mt 23, 23-39], which could easily be translated with the expression at the’ mortacci your, vipers because it defines an entire race, place for more than the serpent was the iconographic symbol of original sin, it means offending all the ancestors of those subjects, ie their entire lineage. While defining, always high priests and notables like tombs that "outside they are beautiful to behold, but inside they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness " [cf. Mt supra] equivalent to define them as authentic sacks of shit.
Etc … etc…
You see, My dear consecrated: the Church is reduced as is also reduced because of people like her, Who changed Christ as a holy iconography, everything beautiful, washed and with the sharp eye, languid, androgynous affixed to the cross.
Well I communicate, without fear of scandalizzarla, that on the cross Christ was first posted naked; on the cross before he lost the urine, or as the said pissing on him all the content orinario he had enclosed in the apparatus urogenital, then, with contraction, It had “fall” and then the collapse of the intestines, losing all the feces. On the cross his face was not that of the holy diaphanous, because drooling and spitting blood for the trauma caused by the runs previously received and all cardiological and neurological disorders of the crucifixion.
I avoid explain, clinical physiological level, another type of reaction due to the first contraction consequent crucifixion, because otherwise I would cry out “to the scandal”, “to sacrilege” e “the blasphemy”, But know that Christ was a real man and he was God incarnate in a man's body. In any case you can be explained by a urologist what happens, to a male body, if it is nailed and contract on a pole, ask him to explain it to him he.
She is a Jesus man is created that does not exist, thats why it can not stand any kind of reference to Jesus' true.
That was not a saint by iconography.
She is heavy, and it is serious for a consecrated.