THE «LOST FAGS» BY PAOLO POLI, THE «FRACY» OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS AND CERTAIN NEW GENERATION BISHOPS-FAGS

The Holy Father Francis was not wrong in saying that fagotism in seminaries is not acceptable, because it isn't, nor can it ever be. However, he was wrong to promote several to the episcopate gay friendly, if not worse, some well-made and refined fags who under his august pontificate ended up with a miter on their heads and a crosier in their hands. And today, one or some of these have betrayed him, reporting to the outside a private speech expressed freely as when speaking in an intimate and confidential way between brothers.

- Church news -

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

 

After the expression about "faggotness", news began to circulate about social media that journalists were present at the Plenary Assembly of the Italian Episcopal Conference and that the Supreme Pontiff Francis himself prevented the award from being givenout of all. After that, in their presence, he would have spoken freely, with the premeditated aim of creating a media case (!?).

The news is false: no journalists, not even those of Future and of Sat2000, not even those from the Vatican media were present.

Widespread news some Bishops, among the over two hundred Italian prelates present in the assembly, without violating any confidentiality they specified to us that at the end of that strictly confidential conversation between the Bishop of Rome and the Bishops of Italy, the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference, S. AND. Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, Metropolitan Archbishop of Bologna, he spoke, specifying that what had been said had to remain strictly confidential and not leave that room, where no stranger was present, least of all journalists.

But let's get back to the "faggot", topic to which we have already dedicated two articles: one of Father Ariel S.. Levi di Gualdo and one of Father Ivano Liguori, before intervening again with this editorial of ours by the Fathers of The Island of Patmos.

Sui social media crazy about everything, even those who shout I can't keep quiet! Phrase inspired by Saint Augustine which explains the passage of the two blind men narrated in the Holy Gospel (cf.. Mt 20, 30-34) who, seeing Jesus pass, began to scream:

«For I fear Jesus passing and remaining, and therefore I cannot be silent» (St. Augustine, Sermon n. 88).

Consider yourself certain promoter dell'omosessualismo inside the church, perhaps it would be better to move from Augustinian to Dante, starting to bang on the motto: «A beautiful silence was never written». Well-known Italian proverb which means to what precious extent the beauty of knowing how to remain silent at the right moment has never been praised enough. Expression attributed to Dante and then reworked in the 17th century by the Venetian poet Iacopo Badoer.

When the Zan bill was being debated, which, behind the pretext of so-called homotransphobia, actually aimed to prosecute the crime of opinion, our authors Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo and Ivano Liguori published a book entitled From Prozan to Prozac, dedicated to the memory of the great Italian theater actor Paolo Poli, who was a dear and affectionate friend of Father Ariel. On the cover of that book there is a scene photo of Paolo Poli and on the fourth (the back cover is called the fourth), This apparently scurrilous phrase of his is reported, but incisive and truthful:

«I see a lot of homologation, a flattening of one's individuality;, even in appearing: all dressed alike in a pseudo-masculine stereotype, logically straight. Gays may have the chance; to express their own uniqueness; and diversity; in the strongest sense; true of the term. But no, they want to play husband and wife and have the Pope's permission to fuck each other! Come on! Never mind" (Paolo Poli, 17 December 2003).

The great Paolo Poli who said of himself «I am homosexual in my DNA», he didn't use the term "gay" but that of fagots, if not worse than "destroyed fagots" or "languid lost fagots", had already identified twenty years ago the problem of certain sexually confused Catholics today who "want to play husband and wife and have the Pope's permission to be able to screw each other". We add between these lines of ours: not only, they also claim the right to become priests and unleash fagotism in our seminaries. While, how many cannot remain silent, they don't even realize that they are sinking into the most grotesque ridiculousness, when hiding behind words like "training" and "education in affectivity", they go so far as to state that sexual tendencies cannot influence the evaluation of priests or candidates for the priesthood, because these are things that concern their private lives (!?).

But this is precisely the dilemma: a priest can perhaps claim to have a private life in which he manifests in private the exact opposite of what he does to a minister in sacred is required? Even magistrates have their own private life, but they cannot convict a drug trafficker in the morning and then in the evening, in their intimacy, sniffer cocaine, justifying everything with the fact that they throw coke in their house, not on the bench of the criminal court between one public hearing and another. Even the soldiers of the Guardia di Finanza have their own private life, but they cannot fine traders who fail to produce tax receipts and then dedicate themselves to tax evasion in their private lives. Undoubtedly, priests also have their own private life, but they can't preach Christian virtues in public and then take it up the ass in their private lives. These are such truisms, these, before which it is appropriate to say that … We cannot be silent.

A priest cannot be affected by fagotism, because in itself it is worse, on a moral and spiritual level, of the active practice of homosexuality. In fact, the Supreme Pontiff Francis took it out on that psychological and behavioral foolishness which represents an attitude and lifestyle incompatible with the priesthood., religious life and the ecclesiastical structures themselves. The Holy Father didn't blame fags, much less with individual fags, towards whom he has always shown - like all of us - concern and welcome. Catholic doctrine imposes this on us (cf.. Catechism NN. 2357-2359) which invites us to welcome, certainly not to discriminate in any way against homosexuals; doctrine that precedes the Zan Bill by more than thirty years, with which there was no aim to ensure that fags were respected, but that the most politicized and ideological could have a legal instrument to pursue the free and completely legitimate opinions of anyone who dares not to think like them. To follow with the confused-Catholic fagots who behind pretexts of education in affectivity and the protection of private life, in concrete facts "they would like to have the Pope's permission to be able to screw themselves", always to paraphrase Paolo Poli who, had he been alive today, would have publicly applauded the Holy Father Francis. Precisely because, he was an all-out homosexual, he never tolerated fagotism.

Some Bishops have betrayed the Holy Father with the aim of embarrassing him, creating a media case and exposing it to harsh criticism and attacks. The single Bishop, or the clubbino of the Bishops who did this, it is made up of those caricatured androgynous Smurfettes who make fun of LGBT associations in their dioceses. They are those - as Father Ariel wrote in his book at the time And Satan became triune published in 2011 ―, who «yesterday led the pious gay brotherhood inside the seminaries, today we find them Bishops".

The Holy Father Francis was not wrong to say that fagotism in seminars is not acceptable, because it isn't, nor can it ever be. However, he was wrong to promote several to the episcopate gay friendly, if not worse, some well-made and refined fags who under his august pontificate ended up with a miter on their heads and a crosier in their hands. And today, one or some of these have betrayed him, reporting to the outside a private speech expressed freely as when speaking in an intimate and confidential way between brothers. This is why it is not good to admit fags in seminaries, because they then spread the worst of fagotism within the Church and its ecclesiastical and religious structures. And today, not a few fagots who foment fagotism, we find them bishops. The Supreme Pontiff Francis therefore poses, faced with this serious problem, some serious questions.

 

the Island of Patmos, 30 May 2024

.

N.B.

In this article we have made use of, deliberately and knowingly, not just the terms usually used by Paolo Poli, but of all those terms such as "faggots", «froce», «fennels», «fennels» … etc … which are routinely used in gay circles and circles, including LGBT clubs, including that term "faggot" which has so scandalized certain activists, who, however, have always used it in a derogatory way towards other gays or gay associations, something that the Supreme Pontiff Francis did not do, neither on this nor on any other occasion during his ten years of pontificate. Both clear.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.