BY LARGE "SABRINA" INTERPRETED BY AUDREY HEPBURN SABRINA THE SMALL BOSU, PUTTING ON STAGE NOTES AFTER HANDLING OF Neocatechumenal indigestible “BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY'S”

.

The Neocatechumenal Way is a sect of Jewish-Calvinist insidiatasi matrix within the Church. To be against this blatantly heretical sect, especially for us Pastors and theologians in the care of souls, to which Christ, God has entrusted the care and custody of his flock, in no way implies being out of the communion of the Church, as the exalted Sabrina rant after having made a very indigestible Breakfast at Tiffany's. Rather, it means defending the Church from widespread metastases: the heresy metastases put into circulation by two self-taught praticoni, who have always behaved like two arrogant sorcerer's apprentice, lying and teaching to lie.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

Article format printing

.

.

Audrey Hepburn in the film Sabrina

On October 8 comes out in the newspaper The cross an article about my latest book, published by Editions The island of Patmos: The Neocatechumenal sect - heresy became Kiko and dwelt among us. The review, published days before on Faith Daily, It is signed by Bruno Volpe [see WHO, WHO]. The 10 October comes the same newspaper an article by Sabrina Bosu, that does not fit into what is the sacred right of reply and criticism, because the deception and manipulation of reality is not a right [see WHO].

.

I did not want just replicate, for this I have consulted with the Fathers de The Island of Patmos, explaining the reasons for this my intention not to reply.

.

Our wise cappuccino Ivano Liguori has convinced me saying:

.

"What you say, about the fact that it is not worth replicating, it is true. But keep in mind that you work for those who can not get to understand certain subtleties of malicious kikos and that is to face the facts of a chick who says that they are legal persons, which are approved by four popes. Therefore, even though you feel that she does not deserve answer - and did not deserve - you should remove its word piece by piece. Not for you, but for those who can read these words and take them for good ".

.

It must first be clarified that the author of this paper was allowed to talk about a book he has not read, merely nibbling from one blog, by a comment to another, Finally launching into assertions that gives me thoughts that never crossed my mind, let alone my lines written and printed. So that, paradoxically, what is the columnist accuses me is denied its from the pages of my book she has not read, but anyone can read, thereby verifying this columnist mind talking about what has never examined, whereas I say this I not a real made by my reassurances “commercial” give in that sense, but by evidence and documents.

.

Ss now hundreds and hundreds Comments furious and severely insulting writings around the network on me by people who, Comment after comment, prove not to have read a single line of what I've written. Those are all of the Neocatechumenal and strictly aggressive attacks and bad directed to my person, without a single one - I repeat: between hundreds and hundreds of comments - replies to the substance of what I wrote in my book. When several of them has been criticized that you can not criticize what you do not know, the answers were not bleak but delusional: "You do not read the book, just only the title ". In vain I said trying to explain that no one, taking just the title of the book by Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist, It can build above a critical, that book must first be read and studied very carefully.

.

The facts documented therefore prove that members of the Neocatechumenal sect, or at least their praetorian, They have passed voice, You have created an enemy and, as a team be against each other bleating sheep have left the attack without even knowing for what and against what they fought, not even knowing the object of the struggle, ie the contents of this book.

.

Now I wish to draw the attention dogmatic theologians, of ecclesiologists and canonists on 'begins initial text of this columnist, certainly the result of the "genius" of some Neocatechumenal who thinks they know a lot and who has decided to use loggerhead this kind lady who introduces herself to the Perugina chocolate kisses as "a woman and mother are journeying". Here are the opening words:

.

"From the moment the Pope recognized the Neocatechumenal Way as a public juridical person in the Church no one can afford to say that there are heresies because there was a very close scrutiny of the Congregation of the Faith and the various ministries that paradoxically those who say that this reality is heretical, when the Church said exactly the opposite, It is placing out of communion " [see WHO].

.

We are before the aberration under each doctrinal profile, theological and canonical. Not only states: who is against us is against the Church and against the Pope, but even it states that anyone who dares to be against this movement is right outside ecclesial communion (!?).

.

All references below dall'improvvida articolista idea of ​​baptismal journey, modeled on that consolation that made them famous and dangerous followers of the Cathar heresy and the Albigensian. And proceeding decided in its lines with these baptismal journey descriptions, the poor loggerhead discharge attack does not account makes it needless to trace the thought of these two old heretical currents, except, however, giving me heretic. That said it remains peaceful as of now that any theologian and church historian, reading his words, recognize in them the influence of Cathar thought and albigesi.

.

With consolidated manipulative and deceptive spirit, the columnist cites the classic words of appreciation expressed by Popes, But by failing to mention the most severe words and expressed many of the same over the years to launch to the initiators of the Neocatechumenal Way severe rebukes. It's numerous speeches, sometimes long, enclosed everyone in By Janet and reported faithfully in my book, that is not built on emotional exaltations kikiano-carmeniane, but on facts, only on facts and documents.

.

From the 2014 al 2018, the reigning Pontiff He addressed on several occasions the Neocatechumenal strict speeches, also enclosed in By Janet and reported faithfully in my book, But not dall'articolista attacking me completely distorting the actual data. And here I note that according to a certain consolidated pastoral style, when the Pontiffs have to issue reproaches, especially if severe tone, begin highlighting the positives, then go on to describe, reproach or negative ones, or things to fix.

.

The Columnist so does that give evidence that we are facing a sect of people whose sense of reality has been altered and destroyed reason and critical thinking in its adherents, to finally be induced to lie and mistificare, as it happens always in the psycho-sects. Then it happens that the official speeches by the Popes from 2000 al 2018 and I faithfully reported, they take only the beginning 'grateful for the good fruits of your Way …», or the good wishes and blessings for walkers departing missionaries, But jumping all disputes, reprimands and warnings made in the next, and much longer part of speech. After that come out happy and further lack of judgment and critical thinking from the Paul VI to the cry "The Church approves us ... we endorse!», threatening below: "... who is against us is against the Church, It is against the Pope!». Until the climax of the real aberration written and published by our poor columnist: who is against us is out of the communion of the Church, because the Church has approved it (!?).

.

In sociological language this statement is called: religious fundamentalism. One is in fact the difference: Taliban put forward Allah, Neocatechumenals a Christ rewritten by Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez to their own use.

.

We remind manipulative liar and his associates that John Paul II He granted him a five-year approval to experiment In the 2002. expired in 2007 the granted test, Benedict XVI, his successor, unspoken following any approval, quite the opposite: first he called them back, He rebuked them and then made them wait a further five-year extension. When finally in 2012 approval was granted to the Neocatechumenal Way with a mere administrative act of the Pontifical Council for the Laity, the Pope gave them a real fiery speech, load of warnings and reprimands. Also this speech acts, but of it, the brainwashed, They have caught a single opening sentence: "Grateful for indubitable good fruit produced by the Way in recent years …», after that, all tough calls made in that long speech in which Benedict XVI called for the respect of the liturgical rules, authority of the bishops and priests, individual freedom of members of the Movement and so to follow, are all words that are not exactly, both for the loggerhead sent to the boarding under the title "A woman and a mother in The Way», both fundamentalists generally Neocatechumenals, sons of a movement "fundamentalist" itself "fanatical and fanatizzante", as defined in the 1983 the Servant of God Pier Carlo Landucci, which I carry at the end of my book the precious and prophetic relationship, followed by the report sent in 1995 the theologian Passionist Enrico Zoffoli the then Vicar General for the Diocese of Rome, Cardinal Camillo Ruini.

.

In the article from the loggerhead push all'arrembaggio no shortage immodest slinguazzate to the reigning Pontiff. Again, however, the columnist fails to mention that in tone and with what harsh words the Pope Francis I turned again to the Neocatechumenal in his official speeches. If I do not mention the talk between these lines, it is only because I brought them faithfully in my book, maintained and documented and all references to the sources and instruments, so I do not repeat myself. Even despite, as their consolidated use manipulative and falsante, extrapolate from these speeches only two good-natured sentences, often only condition, jumping all the reproaches, then repeat the mantra: "The Holy Father approves it, we endorse, in all and for all!».

.

I therefore all'improvvida columnist just a few questions, which usually do not respond settaristi Neocatechumenals fundamentalist, Why, before certain questions, or change the subject, or raise controversy that are off topic, or attack shamelessly lying and distorting the real data objectively.

.

The writer, like any purely Neocatechumenal, In fact, never does not fit into the merits of the accusations of heresy, quite the opposite: First twists words and concepts, then reproach me accusing me of heresy to give the heterodox the Popes. Nothing further from the truth, because all the interventions made by the Supreme Pontiffs on the Neocatechumenal Way are Orthodox and fully conform to Church doctrine. Maybe, those two arrogant self-taught by Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez, sorcerer's apprentice theology and catechists-do-it-yourself they meekly obeyed the voice and the repeated warnings given to them by the Successors of Peter!

.

Therefore, if the author of this article surreal and mystifying, played entirely on subjective emotions and manipulation of facts and texts, It intends to respond, It should give it to these few, simple and precise questions:

.

1 – Because the Neocatechumenal Way does not comply with the approved statute concerning the internal bore, payment of the tithe, which is not expected, or unconditional obedience to the catechists, also not expected?

2 – Because the Neocatechumenal Way does not publish the thirteenth volume of the Directory, as expressly requested by the Holy See in the decree of approval of the 2012 referred to? And because there are a further two volumes dedicated to wedding and honeymoon, never approved by the Holy See?

3 – Because the Way does not respect the liturgical norms contained in the Roman Missal and reaffirmed by education Sacramentum [cf. WHO] continuing to not kneel during the Eucharistic Prayer, comunicarsi simultaneously to the priest, to dance after the Blessing and so to follow?

.

I neocatecumenali, They have always been such splendid models of obedience to the Church and the Popes, to the point that Benedict XVI repeatedly rebuked by the competent dicasteries of the initiators of the Neocatechumenal Way, in particular for their unacceptable liturgical abuses, all with repeated official intervention of the Prefect for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, that he came to write him a letter of fire in which his debut saying "I announce to the Holy Father's decisions', that in ecclesiastical language is to say: "We command you ...". Then followed all the directives on the Sacred Liturgy. Is this, like other documents, I am obviously given everyone in my book.

.

Repeatedly and public documents of the Holy See, the Neocatechumenal was required to abide scrupulously books and liturgical rubrics, indeed he was even forced to write this in their statutes. they, however,, He closed the doors of their lounges, seguitavano and today they continue to do what they want and how they want. For this time it was extended for another five years by Benedict XVI, very devoted and profound was their obedience to the commands of the Roman Pontiff and the Holy Church.

.

We come to the last Passover, this year's, to demonstrate to bugiardissima columnist - who knows certain things -, what is really in fact the obedience of the Neocatechumenal, that faced with criticism addressed to them, based on facts and evidence, even dare to react slinguazzando in public the Roman Pontiff. Well: What happened around Italy, in all those dioceses where the bishops have forbidden the Neocatechumenal to do “They” Easter vigil separated from the community of the faithful? This happened: They have rented halls in local hotels, They have hired a complacent priest released by the multinational heretical Seminars mother of The Redeemer, and in total disobedience and scarring with the conditions laid, They have been held elsewhere “They” Easter vigil. But if now the columnist will dare to deny it all, we will start with the publication of the movies, always I am insisting that I speak and write only on the basis of facts and evidence: on the one hand we have in fact written ban given by the diocesan Bishop, the other movies that immortalize the obedient Neocatechumenal celebrating the Easter Vigil in the lounge of a hotel. So, those who disobey and that it sets out from the communion of the Church? Because the output from the communion, It springs from disobedience and is built on disobedience, namely sport as increasingly practiced by the Neocatechumenal, only to attack a priest and a theologian who unmasks them in public, even attempting to defend themselves in pedestrian way slinguazzando at the same time the Pope and saying that I would even be, against the Successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter. But that kind of authentic Mephistopheles shameless shamelessly and without any respect for the truth!

.

Can the writer send to the attack how sweet "woman and mother are journeying", deny all these facts and, above all acts of the Holy See called me with surgical precision 315 pages of my book? Can it be denied that today, with rare and indomitable arrogance, Neocatechumenals continue to perpetrate serious liturgical abuses of all kinds? I'm not saying that, prove many films shot recently in their communities around the world. Not only: some of these egregious liturgical abuses also attended by the false prophet and bad teacher Kiko Argüello, that gives the homily holding the processional cross like the ministry of a bishop. Tell us the columnist: are perhaps false movies created on a set of footage from a consortium of satanic haters of the greatest gift given to the Church by the Holy Spirit, the Neocatechumenal Way? He who after the proclamation of the Holy Gospel, the Homily, is Kiko Argüello, or his stunt hired by haters Noecatecumenale Way? The assembly of people receiving Holy Communion seated, passing from hand to hand the wine Copponi, who I am? They Neocatechumenal, or of paid extras for set filming set up by haters to make shooting and peddle false movies, therefore highly defamatory to this coven of authentic models of devout obedience to the Church and to the repeated provisions from that date to them?

.

Before writing my book I listened for weeks, for hours, catechesis recorded and held by several mega-catechists in which is contained and transmitted the heretical sacro verbo kikiano. Any theologian to which they were subjected those numerous and long recordings, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, at the end of listening could only answer as I said: so many heresies all together, I have never heard them in my life! Tell us the columnist: are perhaps false records created always somewhere consortium of satanic haters of the greatest gift given to the Church by the Holy Spirit, the Neocatechumenal Way? However, if they are authentic, all heresies that these documents are contained and transmitted to the poor settaristi, He should perhaps be taken as genuine truths of faith by virtue of an administrative recognition granted to them by the Pontifical Council for the Laity, with the consequence that anyone who opposes it is that fact outside the communion of the Church, rant like this "woman and mother are journeying" penning the’begins his delusional article?

.

In the early nineties, the man of God wrote the Passionist Enrico Zoffoli:

.

"The Neocatechumenal are induced to alter and distort reality and to lie, up to become authentic experts and specialists in the lie ".

.

I always shared this analysis which contains one of the main essences of that poisonous intra-ecclesial cancer that is the Neocatechumenal Way: a Jewish sect matrix-Calvinist insidiatasi within the Church.

.

To be against this blatantly heretical sect, especially for us Pastors and theologians in the care of souls, to which Christ, God has entrusted the care and custody of his flock, in no way implies being out of the communion of the Church, as the exalted Sabrina rant after having made a very indigestible Breakfast at Tiffany's. It means to defend the Church from metastases: the heresy metastases put into circulation by two self-taught praticoni, who have always behaved like two arrogant sorcerer's apprentice, lying and taught to lie to defend the supreme psycho-sect that despises the ratio without which you can not reach the fides [cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Faith and Reason] ma, good going, only the worst Fideism eretical–kikiano.

.

the Island of Patmos, 15 October 2019

.

.

The book The Neocatechumenal Sect It is on sale at the store library WHO

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]