WHY THE FATHERS DE L'ISLE OF PATMOS HAVE CHOSEN NOT TO MENTION THE SYNOD PANAMAZZONICO? WHY DO NOT WE JOURNALISTS A SCOOP OF HUNTING, PROCESS BETWEEN THE INTENTIONS, COLLECTIVE SCHIZOPHRENIA AND CATHOLICS IN QUESTION disarray

[…] said the early seventies of the twentieth century, the Servant of God Enrico Medi: "Of the modern world does not scare me atomic weapons, pollution or wars; what scares me is the collective madness towards which the world is falling ".

.

Author
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Rome, January 2019: Fathers de The Island of Patmos

Contemporary society, but also the Church itself, that the company is a living part, now it seems pervaded by a very dangerous virus: assume that you know that ...

.

With no little anxiety we read, After that they were sent by Readers, blog pages and various magazines for weeks throwing fire bombs on the Synod Panamazzonico. What's unique and that these characters - mostly anonymous faceless, nameless - who pose as saviors of true and authentic doctrine, as authentic keyboard lions without identity registry shot and they continue to fire bursts that every good player should judge least worrisome. It is in fact an attitude that does not fall in war schemes of "preventive war", but the actual process of intentions.

.

For now what we have in hand, Panamazzonico Synod of everything to celebrate, then to decide and to define? We only have one tool of labor which rightly he disturbed a great Church historian and ecclesiologist of the stature of Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, the track to illustrate in an entirely legitimate and just opened it, along with other prominent figures and theologians who followed him, the extent to which this text was written badly and harbinger of ambiguity. For now we can only be said to be very concerned that it was approved a preparatory document that contains errors and ambiguities. We can then express that if certain theses from the working tool would pass, and might go to construction, we could not even speak of heresy, but the real apostasy from the faith, as explained by Cardinal Walter Brandmüller [cf. see article, WHO]. Also worth mentioning that these our columns, we were the first ever - without thereby wanting to give Firsts “honor” —, to write that what was actually a panamazzonico synod pantedesco [cf. see article, WHO], If numbers and dates are not a vague opinion. All the more reason we was pleased when a few weeks later, il Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, He stated that the preparation of this synod hovered a strong German influence. They then followed the bishops and priests from around the world, theologians and lay faithful, Catholic opinion makers and journalists who experienced all of their more than legitimate concerns, founded and motivated.

.

The army of quarrelsome enthusiasts, that without the litigation they may lose all reason for existence of their weak faith and poor, however, miss the fact that the elderly, skilful and polished Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, as those who have followed him, speak hypothetically, on the sole objective fact that we have at the moment, ie the preparatory document, said tool of labor. A poorly written text and containing obvious doctrinal errors. To follow these days with another member of the College of Cardinals who has also lifted its reservation, this time it is a prefect in charge, Cardinal Marc Ouellet Armand it, who presides over the ministry of the bishops and of which refers in these hours the vaticanista Sandro Magister with its own service [cf. see article, WHO].

.

Day by day Unfortunately we find ourselves in front of people who may vary by journalists to the various telematic magazines, to follow with a jungle of mostly anonymous blog, who they have already given feedback and severe decided on a Synod that has not opened yet.

.

If the Synod was planning and propose anything that would go against the doctrine and the perennial teaching of the Church, even before what one might like to scream that much. Nothing in fact become new doctrine or new ecclesiastical discipline until the Roman Pontiff, which is responsible for drawing up the final document, He will not have accepted in whole or in part the instances of the Synod Fathers issuing a his post-synodal apostolic exhortation. Just before this document, ie before the data truly objective, It will be possible to take note and then express themselves, or if also express reservations, even if there were only a passage that ambiguously would create conflict with the deposit of credit.

.

Before the People of God, we have responsibilities now perhaps more demanding than ever. For the sacrament of grace devolves to us to teach, sanctify and lead or govern believers of Christ. In particular schizophrenic when certain members of the People of God would claim their, to teach their bishops and priests, to dictate their own rules on how to sanctify, but above all to drive them, according to their humoral whims and irrational, the bishops and priests.

.

Those of us who are burdened by these responsibilities, in a Church in which the laity often seems almost crazy in a reversal of roles that should really worry, we can not and should not put us to do or preventive wars or processes the intentions of something that must be realized. With this it is said that, I know the final document of the Synod He came out out even a single element expressed explicitly or hidden between words ambiguously, going to contradict the deposit of faith and Catholic doctrine, at that point we would be required in science and Catholic conscience to apply the words of the Blessed Apostle Paul and then to act accordingly ...

.

"I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ turning to a different gospel. In reality, But, there is not another; just that there are some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. Well, But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel other than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed! We have already said it and now I repeat it: if any man preach a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be accursed! Indeed, It is perhaps the favor of men that I intend to earn, or rather that of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still pleasing men, do not be a servant of Christ!» [Gal 1, 5-10].

.

... but only after you can do so, following in the footsteps of the Apostle Paul Blessed and only in the cases indicated by him, not before, because neither the doctrine nor the Catholic morality make or encourage in any way the process of intentions, even when intentions are not good and are revealed to this potentially very dangerous.

.

That's why the Fathers de The Island of Patmos can not and should not talk about what still has to be realized - always assuming that to happen - because we feel all our deepest responsibility to the people of God, in this ecclesial society and increasingly confused ecclesiastical, humoral and schizophrenic. Or as said in the early seventies of the twentieth century, the Servant of God Enrico Medi:

.

"Of the modern world does not scare me atomic weapons, pollution or wars; what scares me is the collective madness towards which the world is falling " [from a conference in October 1974 at the Catholic University of Milan].

.

the Island of Patmos, 2 October 2019

.

.

It is for sale our new book, you can view it at the store library WHO

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]