Writes Cardinal Walter Brandmüller: "The Instrumentum laboris of the Synod panamazzonico is heretical and is an act of apostasy from the Catholic faith"
Latest posts by Drafting (see all)
- Who is Marco Felipe Perfetti referring to when he states from the Silere Non Possum website «here in the Vatican … us in the Vatican", if he can't even set foot in the Vatican? - 8 December 2023
- The Archabbot emeritus of Montecassino Pietro Vittorelli has died: pity can erase the sad truth? - 14 October 2023
- “miss Universe”. The island of Patmos deals with beauty because it is a manifest expression of God and his gifts in human history - 10 July 2023
dear father Ariel
to point out https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/padre-james-martin-papa-francesco-ha-amici-lgbt-e-ha-nominato-molti-cardinali-arcivescovi-e-vescovi-che-sostengono-il-mondo-lgbt/?fbclid=IwAR2EHCO5FMTTCMXwGjPqcgVlc5O9uJBVEarx-M1i2OklT8o-MqYI6auvNx0
Dear Father Ariel, long as there are priests like her (and many others) the Church will never collapse!
For the rest I feel deep sorrow for what is happening but I can not trust in Divine Providence.
Once I was told that “the world is basically good;” because it has perfected goodness that no human action could ever undermine.
Thank you for your article.
dear father ARIEL
to point out https://www.vaticannews.va/it/papa/news/2019-06/papa-emerito-libro-spiega-titolo-benedetto-xvi.html
Emeritus Pope does not exist is an invention of Ratzinger
I expressed myself unclearly. Actually I think as a father Cavalcoli, I believe that the Catholic doctrine prevents think that the pope can teach error even in the ordinary magisterium, in the sense that God, in his omnipotence and providence, You can prevent this from happening, to the limit by intervening from the outside (impediments, illnesses, death etc.). What I think in simplistic reasoning Cavalcoli is that it ignores the adagio Latin, i.e. that “argument against the party”. If the Pope teaches the error (for example on moral aspects) or if tomorrow will teach on sacramental issues we will not fix anything, but take note, with dismay, maybe something in the Catholic faith. Are, indeed, continuity in proposing faith is no longer the distinctive character of the Catholic Church and her Magisterium, to whom shall we go? Also because we're not talking about open issues, but defined doctrines that are challenged.
I believe, or of the falling of the church from che questo sia il con essa anche a point of faith, standing as it.
Dear don Ariel,
remember your remote controversy with Father Cavalcoli on the closure of the pope to the Holy Spirit's inspirations.
Cavalcoli claimed a sort of inerrancy of the pope, that was a little’ to smile, it is conceived in a manner, in my opinion, a powder’ mechanics: when he became pope, Cardinal-elect can not teach error, worth the loss of Christ's promise to Peter.
Now, beyond the way to explain it, the father Cavalcoli thesis is perfectly in line with what the Catholic faithful have believed until yesterday: that is, the important thing is to be in communion with the Roman Pontiff.
Cavalcoli saying that if he drew the pope's words had to be properly interpreted, which is to say that the four, when you need, we do become five.
In reality, This is the theological problem unsolved: how I can be in communion with the pope who teaches the error in official texts? Of course, It is not solemn magisterium, but it's magisterium. How could God let this?
Here is not in question the moral life of the Pope or his personal ideas, but the teaching of the doctrine. If the guarantor does not warrant, who will guarantee?
_____
added next:
I expressed myself unclearly. Actually I think as a father Cavalcoli, I believe that the Catholic doctrine prevents think that the pope can teach error even in the ordinary magisterium, in the sense that God, in his omnipotence and providence, You can prevent this from happening, to the limit by intervening from the outside (impediments, illnesses, death etc.). What I think in simplistic reasoning Cavalcoli is that it ignores the adagio Latin, bone che "argument against the party". If the Pope teaches the error (for example on moral aspects) or if tomorrow will teach on sacramental issues we will not fix anything, but take note, with dismay, maybe something in the Catholic faith. Are, indeed, continuity in proposing faith is no longer the distinctive character of the Catholic Church and her Magisterium, to whom shall we go? Also because we're not talking about open issues, but defined doctrines that are challenged.
I believe, or of the falling of the church from che questo sia il con essa anche a point of faith, standing as it.
I apologize if I dare to express myself about:
There guarantees, in the Spirit, prayer, Scripture and Tradition: the “Stone” He does not teach any new doctrine but, if they repented, confirms and clarifies the only doctrine revealed by Christ.
Revelation is given to the Church and her mediation. If the Church collapses, everything else collapses too. There can be no revelation without Church, worth dropping in Protestantism, which reduces the Church to the community in which everyone receives and interprets in his own way and neither can exist without Peter's Church unless you become Orthodox: many autocephalous Churches. The credibility of the Church to Benedict XVI was based on continuity in the magisterium. If this continuity is broken, in that sense we can still talk about the Catholic Church and especially in what sense we can say that the Catholic Church is the true Church of Christ?
The Revelation, you see God's word, It was completed by Christ (DV 4) and it was entrusted to the Church to “He remains always in its entirety and be transmitted to all generations” (DV 7).
However, “to derive the exact meaning of the sacred texts, care must be taken with no less diligence the content and unity of the whole Scripture, taking due account of the living tradition of the whole Church and the analogy of faith” (DV 12).
Of this, Unfortunately, the current Pope does not take any account and then, that expresses, are just his personal and not the authentic Magisterium.
One example from recent the living: at the end of CV 12 states that “Jesus praises the young sinner who takes the good way most of those who believe to be true but does not live the spirit of love and mercy.”
However, if you go to read the Gospel parable, the “young sinner” It is not praised in any way, and the brother who “He had an old heart and let greed possess, selfishness and envy”, It is remembered that all the paternal inheritance is exclusively his and not the younger brother.
“who will guarantee?”
Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary.
What does the Cardinal with the expression “in a way that was not previously thought possible”? That was not considered possible that such an attack came from within the visible Church?
How I can give birth to something like “An instrument of labor” above?
Simply using the same technique used in AL:
– This is the Revelation, the divine law and the natural law as if they were the same thing;
– It reaffirms what St. Thomas says about the natural law;
– It is concluded that the revelation is not immutable but that is changing as it must be subject to specific cases.
In practice, it now defines the “mercy” as the search for a mediation between the divine law and human behavior at variance with it, and not the embrace of the Father who will be seeking, with a sincere heart, concretely to return to Him.
In my humble opinion, it seems to me that the problem of perspective here. Let nature be upgraded to one of the privileged places of the manifestation of God, He teaches S. Paul in his Letter to the Romans, where highlights the heathen are without excuse for their ignorance of God, in that “… that God can be known is their manifesto; God himself has revealed to them. [20]Indeed, the world's creation onward, His invisible nature can be understood and perceived in what he has done …” (RM 1. 19-20); not to mention the importance that the natural world is in great saints such as S. Francis or S. Ildegarda in Bingen. Even the integration of non-Christian symbols in Christianity, what has always happened (we think the Christmas tree, by it.). Obviously the situation is different if you use the exaltation of nature or indigenous religions to oppose them to the western Christian culture, in the wake of the destruction of our identity, indeed culture, now in place. In that case did well Card. Müller to express his criticism, which, however, in my opinion, It would have been more effective if he had distinguished the two planes.
Thank you for publishing this courageous intervention. I must confess that the day I read the instrumentum laboris did not sleep. It's right Don Ariel: everything has now collapsed. It's a few days ago the news of the meeting between carbonara Kasper, Baldisseri, Hummes and other prelates and German-speaking theologians to decide how best to make us swallow their idea of neochiesa. We just have to pray a lot and show our dissent to this debacle. Allow me to shoot a petition in favor of Cardinal Brandmuller. FOSE will not help much, because the film we have already seen with the synod on the family, but at least we are not silent. https://lifepetitions.com/petition/support-cardinal-who-is-condemning-amazon-synod-working-doc-as-apostasy?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=852d4ae9e5-SUPPORT_BRANDMULLER_06_27_19&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-852d4ae9e5-402186749
attention to the death of Cardinal date. Caffara is wrong 1938-1917!!! i guess 2017
Thank you so much for bringing this typo
Very. There was more, of men with attributes like him, and the other three, and the Church would not be reduced in this wretched state. Ma, evidently, there is a providential plan, in these events seemingly indecipherable…
dear father ariel
I would like to ask you
the Code of Canon Law reports
“Can. 1364 – § 1. The apostate, a heretic or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication, without prejudice to the prescript of can. 194, § 1, n. 2; the cleric, moreover, may be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336, § 1, NN. 1, 2 e 3.
§2. If a longstanding contempt or the gravity of scandal, They can add other penalties, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.”
but for these gentlemen who proposed this “tool of labor” is valid or not? It always takes a canonical trial, but then the faithful when the shepherds make apostasy must always obey? What confidence can be stored in those who destroy the Catholic faith, Thank you
dear fabio,
in many of my writings, two years now, lament, I explain and show that not only all the basic canon laws are disregarded, but if before serious wrongdoing or injustice one requesting it, the result is that the one who violates it is protected, those who claim the application ends punished.
Therefore, contact at this time to the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, or to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith responsible for crimes against the faith, It would like to ask a Soviet court to denounce the Stalinist era deportations to the gulag of political dissidents, seeking a judgment against those who deported them and their immediate release.
It is not that everything is falling apart but worse: everything has now collapsed.
Perhaps before long we will discover what were, behind it, God's plans.
dear father Ariel
he did not answer me, the faithful when they notice that as you say “everything has now collapsed” what must he do, It must obey? It must resist? How convenient? And when a pope clearly deviates from his office, which it is to guard the deposit of faith and tradition? It must consider the pope? Heresy does not automatically lose the sense office? The confusion, the ambiguity does not come from malignant?
… to see, the thing is very simple: the Roman Pontiff is not judged by any human authority, either ecclesiastical or secular, because it can not be subjected to any human judgment as there is no authority superior to her who can judge.
So much so that to date the judgments or decisions personally or approved by the Roman Pontiff, It can not be presented any appeal [can. 333 § 3].
That the so-called “Pope apostate” it's just pure speculation, an academic speculation, because never in the history of the Church occurred the case of a pope fell into apostasy.
Heresy means that someone will judge and recognize it as such and then condemn the heretic, but if the heretic – always for academic hypothesis – It was a Roman Pontiff, there does not take over a slight problem: first, no one can judge; second, no one can lay.
Instead, if one day the Church was transformed into a parliamentary republic, at that point, to the elected President of the Catholic Church whose mandate is given and taken away by voters through the mechanism of free elections, the procedure could start impeachment so to be able to depose, and convict.
What, however, can not be done with the Roman Pontiff, holder of a power that he comes directly from God and therefore can only be judged by God.
It's not so hard to understand.
Instead, it is difficult to understand. Indeed, if I can not be in communion with the Pope, because it taught me the error in matters of faith and morals, this fact does not imply the end of the Church and, Consequently, the same Catholic faith that is based on the continuity of the Magisterium? Where the Church is a time that the pope is no longer obbedibile? Where is his indeffetibilità? I wrote a correction to my comment that has not been published in which I said that the fact that the Church “you change” il il announce the point standing or falling Church. It should be added Catholicae. Indeed, would remain the possibility to go on without hierarchy, becoming Protestant or be autocephalous Churches, as the Orthodox. These things I write to you as a priest, because I assure you that the desire to take the door and walk away, even at the age of fifty, It is very strong. It was already difficult before, Now it is becoming impossible.