12
replies
Comments are closed.
The website of this magazine and the editions take name from the Aegean island in which the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse, isola also known as «the place of the last revelation»
«God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»
(in higher than the others, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)
The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma
Creator and editor of this magazine website:
MANUELA LUZZARDI
but which church is the one that you describe? you really think that this is so?
Father Sosa is entirely consistent: the devil is a symbolic representation because, in turn, God is a myth, the human representation of the ancestral archetypes. How can you blame those who have lost faith not to bring his views to catechism? The you should seek rather to leave the garment.
dear father Ivano, it is one thing to be hardened sinners like you and me, Another thing to be declared apostates and atheists.
If there is only a symbol of evil created by us, why not say the same of Good, mythologized in our imagination with the name of God ?
Father Ivano,
nice article!
Pope Clement XIV was a Franciscan like you, not a cappuccino, but a Friar Minor Conventual.
E’ fake, historically false to say that this Pope has suppressed the Society of Jesus to please several European sovereigns who had hated the Jesuits.
The interpretation of the historian Ludwig von Pastor defining suppression 1773 as a gesture of extreme yield the courts borboniche, What is quite false! Li suppressed to the serious problems that were creating and strong influences also policies that were exercising, because now the plant was already running, and at the same time they were an influential numerical and economic power.
the trials? Just look at the results produced in countries evangelized by the Franciscans and Dominicans and in countries evangelized by the Jesuits.
In the countries evangelized by the Jesuits are: syncretism in the East countries, all kinds of obstacles to the creation of local Bishops Conferences, because the Jesuits, in Asian countries, They had in their hands all the apostolic vicariates, mingling with the rulers of the place, often it figures also very violent and bloody, etc …
Then, in America Latina? Commixtures between gospel and Marxism, support to the guerrillas, Dissemination of heterodox doctrines, liberation theology, etc … etc …
And today?
Today we have a Society of Jesus (or eat father says Ariel “Company of the Indies”) peppered the worst heresies, spreading heresies, who throws a straight leg in the policies of the international left, that does not put to rest scum like James Martin who wishes “happy gay pride” the Sodomites proud, whose superior general a guy over and over again slipped on the fundamentals of the catechism …
And what we see?
At the commissioner of religious institutions who would not dream even, to do, and only in small part, what they have done and are now doing the Jesuits.
God deliver us from this cancer early!
I think that this is a spiritual order punishment for failing to meet the calls of the message of Fatima. This applies to both high and low-ranking clerics, both the baptized faithful, for the most part, starting from the sixties, They have begun to embrace the worldly life, neglecting what Our Lady had invited to practice: prayer and penance, with the renunciation of all that would alienate the souls from God.
I am a simple faithful, wife and mom.
I would like to express what I feel about this topic, I find somewhat related to the previous article by Father Ariel.
In a family's need for children to have a reference parents, Figure determinant education, in the transmission of values, for a healthy way to grow.
Today parents are not parents but “Amici”, equal partners, are weak families.
The child needs a safe ride, strong, loving, “parental”. It also needs “no”.
In the Church it seems to me to happen a little’ as the family: He has lost the guide, everyone can do everything (except administer the sacraments, I hope), everyone can say everything and the opposite of everything, Fig of “Dad” (not surprisingly, the priests are called “Fathers”), He has totally lost its dignity, its specific role, its being a reference for the “children” spiritual.
The fruit of modernity.
Or rather the result of this embodiment of evil that is undermining precisely the cornerstones, the reference figures, in the family or in the Church?
The attack seems to me “dad”, be it secular or religious.
And, in the last two Father Ivano writing articles on the superior general of the Jesuits and Father Ariel writing about the case of the card. George Pell treated two different topics, but united by a single common denominator: the total distortion of the reality.
The reality is something objective, but something that you create, according to the needs and circumstances.
As a result, it ends up creating a faith according to their needs.
Already in the past, Jesuit Sosa, He pleaded “are allergic to the doctrine”, remember?
As Catholic, I claim instead of the sacrosanct right to be allergic to people like him, as Spadaro … e … never mind the rest!
«… is the evil spirit that makes you do things that go against the spirit of God is not a person ..., is a way to implement the evil ... Good and evil are in constant struggle in human consciousness, and we have ways to point them. We recognize God as good, entirely good. Symbols are part of reality, and the devil exists as a symbolic reality, not as a personal reality '
Therefore, if it is stated that:
– the evil spirit is against the spirit of God,
– good and evil are struggling permanent,
– God is good, and the devil is symbolic reality,
–>It must logically conclude that God is symbolic reality as it is the personification of good!!!
But Sosa sees that through his mouth speaks Satan himself?
I had the feeling that Sosa spoke of God as a symbol of good. If it is so, not just of heresy, but with apostasy and the conclusion it is that man becomes God and determines what is good and what is bad.
Thank you so much dad Ivano.
A distant relative who succeeded discussed Arrupe, named Father Giuseppe Dezza, to feel this crazy Sosa she'll be turning in his grave!
Fortunately, the International Association of Exorcists has clearly expressed about:
https://aiepressoffice.com/it/2019/08/22/comunicato-alla-stampa-della-i-e-sulla-dichiarazione-di-padre-arturo-sosa-abascal-al-meeting-di-rimini/
15 November 1972 General Audience Saint Peter's Square, Pope Paul VI – Deliver us from Evil –
………Sin opportunity and effect of an intervention in us and in our world of a dark agent and enemy, the Devil. Evil is no longer only a deficiency, but an efficiency , a living being, spiritual, perverted and actually pervertitore.Terribile. Mysterious and frightening.
Exits framework of biblical and ecclesiastical teaching those who refuse to recognize it exists.
Or who makes a principle in its own right,not having it well, like all creation originates with God.
Or explain it as a pseudo-reality ,a conceptual and fanciful personification of the unknown causes of our misfortunes………………..
Hi I would like to ask the saints and popes of the council post, where they were when modernism penetrated the Society of Jesus, and why it was not resolved?
Thank you.