No. of Pope Francis The admission of homosexuals in seminaries? the drama of the moral decay of the clergy arises from the lack of proper training, so then we end up finding ourselves with an army of queers and checchine, dive and divine within the ecclesiastical body
Latest posts by Drafting (see all)
Dear Fathers Ariel and Cavalcoli, I fully agree with the comment of “fabius”. The situation of the Church, and then the world, it is dramatic, and this situation is definitely not a stranger him that you refuse to call “Supreme Pontiff”. There can certainly slip that it is written that you will see “the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place”. Whether then in Jerusalem or Rome it is almost secondary, what matters is to stay alert and prepared, Truth can not be overridden, it is in the Gospel of Jesus, the Christ, certainly not in the ravings of false prophets and apostatici. I understand very well your distress, The prolonged silence it is clear symptom. What to do? and if it is true that councils serve to those who give them, I will refrain: every man for himself and God for all.
Cordially,
Licio Zuliani
For the “training” there are technical, and theoretical, and scientists, who know a thousand and a thousand methods theoretical training, a more modern and brighter and more effective than the. But it lacks the Faith, what do you want to form ? For those who go against God to be free to go against nature, can not be achieved other than deformation.
prejudice to point out https://adelantelafe.com/escandalo-francisco-nombra-cardenal-a-obispo-casado-y-con-hijos/ scandal
In this article we talk about anything and she placed a comment that has nothing to do with the subject matter.
Even more so the answer: having to choose – if the choice was their own mandatory – better a cardinal with a child that a cardinal with a “boyfriend”, but really much better than the first of the second.
If someone loves schifarsi with real videos go on YouTube and look “don Euro” nickname that don Morini umpteenth scandal that dragged the Diocese of Massa Carrara including its Bishop albeit with marginal charges. VA’ He said that the Bishop was indeed somewhat imprudent, let us say, a great “cloven” because the subject was well known to his predecessor, who took various measures but did not dare to drive him.
As for immigration, Perhaps the Pope does not know (???) or he does not believe the stories behind the phenomenon. Please read the article today on Interris which also summarizes facts already well known: HTTPS://www.interris.it/sociale/cosa-c–behind-the-immigration-of-mass
Peace and good
Salve.
Reading the article I find the explanation of who the Church leaders have encouraged the rahnerismo,on the part of ecclesiastical authority there has been no condemnation of Rahner's thought,then rightly remember that priests should receive sound doctrine,but I can not explain how, when the Pope to the doctrine I am allergic, just see how he created such confusion in the Church to create confusion.
On gay Pope knows the situation,He knows that there is a gay lobby,but then he was the one with the sad famous phrase that has cleared through customs homosexuality “who am I to judge” In fact, two gay men who move in together, we can not say anything because we would respond, but who are you to judge?
The law on civil unions has grown thanks to its non-intervention in politics on the non-negotiable values, and intervenes on migrants in an exaggerated and incomprehensible hoping the invasion of hordes of Islamic majority immigrants,the Pope is useless that you defend, It is indefensible and has serious faults.