From the desert to Christmas: In the beginning was the Word, it was not the poor, It was not a refugee, born lo jus soli
Latest posts by father ariel (see all)
- The fans of Mary co-redemptrix, a gross contradiction in theological terms - 6 February 2024
- A good priest is such if he waits for the end of his mandate to praise his Bishop: Andrea Turazzi, from today Bishop emeritus of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro - 3 February 2024
- Charity washes and makes even dirty money clean, The great Saints of Charity teach us this in the history of the Church - 23 January 2024
Dear father Levi,
Jesus was not a πτωχός but the son of a τέκτων is written in the Gospels.
In the Gospels it is written as it was conceived in the virginal womb of Mary, the γυνή Joseph.
The Magisterium teaches that Jesus took on our human nature, except sin, and that therefore his physical body was subject to our very laws of nature: was also subject to biological laws DNA?
Tell me where you're going, then the answer.
Or maybe you think I was born yesterday?
Since I had already touched the topic, I was not wrong to believe that it was clear what I was getting: But first I would like to state, hoping you do not get angry if I steal a period, “if it is something serious de-construct dogmas, What is equally and not less serious proclaim dogmas that do not exist”.
Reiterating then my allegiance to the dogma of the perpetual virginity of conception by the Holy Spirit, how dogma would be in contrast to the hypothesis that the legitimate husband, as well as putative, It is also the biological father?
If you do not want to start discussing it in public to prevent anyone misunderstand, you have my address: ad ogni modo, the culmination of this my thoughts are male priesthood, the sanctity of marriage and the “femininity (understood as the one who receives)” human being related to “masculinity(understood as the one who gives)” of God.