Synodus iuvenibus. Ecclesia, Post shoah catholica in mundo, ut novus processus ad vitae iudicatus est, Patrum Cardinalium et Episcoporum, ubi non respondere ad iudices: “Et non audivimus vocem superiores”. 7 October 20188 October 2018 isoladipatmos — ecclesial news — SYNODI puerorum. ECCLESIA, DE UNITATE ET POST Shoah, DE PROCESSU AD NOVAM NUREMBERG incipientes iudicari, WHERE Patribus Cardinalibus Episcopisque respondebit DISCIPLINA IUDICUM: “Ego solum audire vocem superiores”. . Ecclesia momentum historicum maxime convenit, iuventutis spiritu peragitur opus Synodo peragendum, dum Ecclesia visibilis, Holocaustum est cum Ecclesia catholica observat, sit ut terminus sursum in atrio Norimberga, qui sententiam ferre, qui in historia remain. Hoc tractu, qui duxit Ecclesiae de reis in atrio et justitia coram oculis mundi iudicatus uni commendatur, ut crimina magna in ecclesia, Mystici Corporis Christi [Cf.. Col. 1, 12-20]. Et sicut factum est in septuaginta annos, nationalis socialismi principes, auditis Cardinalibus et Episcopis constans faciemus, Respondeo dicendum quod ad iudices: “Et non audivimus vocem superiores”. . in originali articulum Italian version . Articulus forma PDF Print . . auctorS Arihel. Levi Tadinensispresbyter Italica Impressionem quod est unum habet quod congestae sunt bibliographiam probabiliter profectus est ut legati Conventus Fontes iuris Germanici antiqui, et nunc quasi ad Parliamentum Respublica Populi Democratica Coreae. Non possum fateri, nos quoque de sinodis in, familiae contigit synodalibus. rectus, ut disseras, Synodorum celebrantur propter hoc ipsum. Quid est autem hoc per verbum disputationibus, autem, quando in ultima document, ante, Patres synodales vidimus approbatioque latitudinem liminis firmiter reliquisti? In eo, si Court quod miracula Dei, quod appellant, Magia aut Circulus, Gerhardo Ludovico Müller ut C. vocat ea, iam paratum est et probatus progressio, quod est usus conciliorum pertinentes? Nisi forte ita collegialis forma iuvenes Quisque dictator, Kim Jong, vult enim quasi parlamentaria democratia? Quid accidit dissidentium Coreae, maybe sunt finita est ligatum et in missilia launched per experimentum probat? . Nos ad indicem rerum agendarum offeret Atrium autem quod miracula aut circulus magicae : Synodo maxime poterimus sine vitio parentum rara iuventus ad serve, ut iam satis ac super demonstrasse, VESTIBULUM ad cognitionem aliquam lbgt. Et quamvis in adolescentia repraesentativis aut nunquam usus est propositum documenta, de quibus in hoc Acronym, a cuius mentione facta est a Laurentio SRE CARDINALI Baldisserri, illa non omittere se exprimere per iter deprehendimus atque inter se contrariis, quod aliqualiter immutare idem est ac mentiendi [videre hIC] . Usus ad sponsionem implementi horum Acronym, quae media: lesbian, gay, et bisexual transsexual, Primum omnium est quaestio de forma et iuris, quae postea non sunt effectus ad doctrinam et magisterium spectantes. Videamus si possumus: Si ad opus Gai Institutionum Commentarii - qui habet nihil facere cum gays, sed ille qui composuit enarrare anno Gaius 180 A.C.. - quaestionem oris sexus est inserta essent secundum ius ad Augusti principatum,, in dating 30 b.C., Haec venereae fuisset praxi habere legalis status tunc leges ad systema Romanum. autem, quaestionem de eo, quod oris sexus non est in lege, non possit in eam immitti in institutis iuris, adhibita etiam aliae formae in latissimo. Et quoniam non est, in lege, illud tale non est ut in institutis autem iuris oris coitu. Iurisprudentiae consulere et temperare non potest tractare quid enim lex non est. Ideo in quolibet iuridiciali, et in iure civili, in usum verba et verba semper Porro Susanna erat delicata, quia lex, ante peccatum, quod solum actum finalem, ut aims agnoscis , et statuam adjust. Et ad terminum statim inseritur personae iuridicae lingua fit terminus iuris consociatur. . Ad hoc etiam addendum, et in exemplum, et quod pauci hodie in Ecclesia visibilis possumus negare: in multis theologice instituit Catholico, cum loquimur de sanctissima Eucharistia asservatur,, Lexicon ex Lutheranis et theologiis Terminologies, magis magisque usi sunt,; exempli gratia, terminology est Lutheranam consubstantiation. Pontificale Romanum in universitatibus audet referre Festo scholasticae, tum theologicis terminum transsubstantiationis, ludi saepe periculum indicatur vel unico Concilium (!?). Et venient illusores,, cuius proprium est inscitia, permanere autem unus ex duobus, qui ignorare Summi Pontifices Concilii Vaticani II,, unum enim hunc ad, transtulit deinceps et clausi, cum beatus Pontifex Paulus VI, ut quoque mox in Sanctorum numerum retulit, et defined in theologis huius casus ferat, ac terminum transsubstantiationis non replaceable [Litterae Encyclicae Mysterium Fidei, No.. 47, illud hIC]. Aut fortasse oportet nos concludere potui, quod vir beatus Pontifex Paulus VI hanc etiam pre-plene viget monitio? Multa enim tempora, sicut me: hodie in Ecclesia visibilis Decretorum Summi Pontifices Romani sunt beatificationem et canonizationem signati ex una parte,, cum aliis in litteris qui percutiunt, vel in aliquibus casibus, irritum, supremum magisterium. . Hodie vivere in Ecclesia visibilis quo facilius institui queat, sicut scholastica, de transubstantiatione archaeologiam terminum, Universitates in atria pontificalia Respuis. autem, simul, Lexical ecclesiasticae inserere, ut possimus verbis lbgt, cum periculo assumptas a luciferian Acronym quod copiam Romani sermonis ab Ecclesiae Magisterio concreditum. Et haec omnia, disserendo perturbare potest non solum a Cardinali Laurentio Baldisseri, in omnibus coryphaeum journalists Pontificium Pravda, pro quo nunquam, ut «epochal novis huius temporis», tam quae perrexerat. Quod ea res, in altitudine Pontificium Russian Seditio, bona Ecclesiarum sunt magis vanae sunt, fidelis autem confundentur, absentis fama clerici vocationes ad. Reiectio sacerdotio umquam tam innumerabilis est quam ex historiae Ecclesiae in novissimo quinque annis, Congregatio pro Clericis silet etiam statistica, quia amicus alter praeest ad Court quod miracula Dei, uel circulus magicae. . Charles Iosephus SRE CARDINALI Chaput, Archiepiscopus Metropolita Prešoviensis Philadelphiae Deo gratias, Ac sublimi virtute Mons;. Charles Chaput, Archiepiscopus Metropolita Prešoviensis Philadelphiae, et audivi vocem suam et recordatus est momenti usus verbis rectam [Cf.. annales: hIC, hIC], quia quoad doctrinam, verba coniunctum est erectio. Sciendum quod omnis qui studuit, et in itinere non exhausta canebat,, primus consilia magno via dogmatica de Ecclesia, ubi, define Christus est in natura Dei,, terminology termini precise modulatorem agnoscas, non eventis, ut Danaum philosophorum, ut de conceptu hypostasis [hypostasis uel naturae unionem hypostaticam]. . Aliquis, define est hodie, - ergo et declara - the various forms of exercitatio sexualitatis species,, quia “masculum et feminam creavit eos” [Gn 1, 26-27], sicut ad inserere velit fortasse in ipsa Ecclesia uti tale sponsionem implementi horum termini Lexicon manuale, ita vitam novam quatripostatic natura humana: ad naturam lesbian, gay, et bisexual transsexual? . In Coetu synodali de cognatione pessumdatus et quasi errabundus ecclesia divisa sit reliquit;, tum multa funera debitum ad subito infarcts sua dederunt ex vinea Domini,. Et delere conati adulterio, hodie patefactus est superius memorata Synodus hanc Iuventatis, videtur velle statuere possis varia oratio, sine qua eluceat - Archiepiscopus Charles Chaput holyly deplorat - et catholici necessario se ad sponsionem implementi horum est, et quod sint Ecclesia legitimare non potest,. Hoc velut paradoxum et aliud exemplum, non possumus quaerere: Potest subiecto, dicitur esse atheos et rectum Catholico, sicut atheus, sua Catholica plenam adhaesionem? Ita, potest quantum omnino, et exaltabitur cor eius, qui transsexual transsexualism, vocare ad se ipsum dici potest catholica, cum transsexual et plenam Ecclesiae catholicae ius civitatis in corpore plena et legitima ratione dici totum illius postulatum causamque. Si edentem cantores «epochal revolutionis» non animadvertit, omnino nova Ecclesia catholica observat natus est figure: atheis initium sumit a Catholico. Et haec de Deo habent in potestate diabolicum: fideles persequuntur acriter ut credentes. . Of the Archbishop by Philadelphia we invite you to read the article «Charity, clarity, and their opposite» [article, hIC] . Videbimus quid erunt finem efficiunt hanc Synodum, Si autem super omnia videbimus, ut in priori,, quid ergo erit reprobari a Patribus Synodalibus ferentes, in supremum finem document, si aliquid occultatum, rursus, ut ambigua disserentem nota aliqualiter vel expressio, quod tantumdem valeret si diceret ... “Ego intelligentes, et insulsi sunt,!”. At quod omnes qui audiebant, quod dat speciem synodalibus, collegialis et potissimum popularis, sicut in Coreanica dictator Kim Jong, qui primus vocat ad Parliamentum pupa Respublica Populi Democratica Coreae, et prorsus non quod non vult. . Post Synodum hanc Nationalem, aperiebatur insertio implementi quatripostatic dogma,, quis non sit in Instrumentum Laboris, in 2019 ad Synodum Amazonic, etiam aperire, quia de concessione coniugum sacerdotium. operam, everything only … ad experimentum. interim, in Romana Dioecesi totoque, quod si non est aliqua nuntium, Iam imperator felis comparatis: paucos dies constitutus “parochus” parrochia de ipsa sede metropolitana - utique: ad experimentum - a diacono permanenti, uenit cum uxore quattuor canonici. Et hoc familia pontis oralis, from the official page of the Deacons of Rome, which is also a filial of the Neocatechumenal Movement, has been indicated as … «diaconal family» (!?) [Cf.. service: hIC]. Having said this, I would like to know: can the members of my family, who have a presbyter in their family, be called the “presbyteral family”? And my mother and my brother can be called “presbyteral mother” et “presbyteral brother”. Obviously extending the title to my “presbyteral sister-in-law” and to my “presbyteral nephew”? And perhaps we want to forget my cat, which would have the title of “presbyteral cat”? Needless to say that the speech would be really long, because those who do not know the story is condemned to repeat it in a pejorative form. It is worth remembering, even if briefly and rapidly, that the diaconate, now called permanent, fell into disuse as an autonomous order and became a step in the process of presbyteral ordination. In eo, in Rome, between the eighth and tenth centuries, the deacons had acquired a pre-eminent role. The deacons were at the head of the main churches and did not even want to be ordained presbyters, because then, from these prestigious churches, they became directly bishops. The permanent diaconate will thus be restored only after a thousand years, by the Second Vatican Council. And note that not all the dioceses of the world have ordained permanent deacons, who are absent, exempli gratia, in most African countries, in order not to generate confusion among Catholic populations; and especially where, for anthropological and cultural reasons, the rules relating to the chastity of celibacy by priests are not always applied. In the heart of Europe, in Poland, the first two permanent deacons were ordained only four decades after the Second Vatican Council, in 2009. . Married priests have always existed in the Eastern Catholic clergy, but they could exercise their ministry only in the dioceses belonging to their rite; a rite regulated, among other things, also by the Code of Canon Law of the Eastern Churches. autem, since great general tests are under way, many of these priests and their families have been received in various Italian dioceses, beginning with the Archdiocese of Perugia, whose archbishop is not a bishop among many, but the president of Episcopal Conference of Italy. Faced with this, I limit myself to asking: in the event of disputes involving a married priest, what right will be applied, the Latin or that of the Eastern Churches? Obviously I know well that the canon law has been replaced by pure free will, which then turns into authentic arrogance that comes to life from the lack of any rule, but the rhetorical question sounds good, and even if it is useless, I do the same. Regarding the possible incardination in the dioceses of the Latin rite, as may happen, the incardination of married priests of the Eastern rite, specifically Latinized, since they are useful for the general tests under way, which aim to please the Head and the circle of his most trusted advisors? All this could be explained by His Eminence Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, who is metropolitan archbishop of Perugia and president of the Italian bishops, and which houses two married priests in his diocese, to anticipate the decisions of the Synod of the Amazon, which we remember: the decisions have already been taken before the opening of the Synod [service hIC]. . Having said this, a question arises: for the region of the Amazon, an experiment is asked to consecrate priests married men, because there is lack of clergy. In Rome, instead, for to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon, what a dramatic lack of clergy there is? Because looking at the diocesan yearbook we find that the metropolitan parishes are 332. The Roman presbytery has 1,256 presbyteries, to which are added 2,929 presbyters of other dioceses residing in Rome. To these secular priests, 5,317 members of the regular clergy (the presbyters of the various religious orders) et 87 other priests belonging to various personal prelatures are added [Official Yearbook of the Diocese of Rome: hIC]. In Rome there are therefore a total of about 9,580 presbyters, among Roman presbyters, presbyters residing in the diocese and presbyters of various religious families. The Diocese of Rome has about 2,350,000 baptized. If we divide the number of Catholic faithful with the number we will have this result: one priest for every 250 faithful. And all this in a Rome with increasingly empty churches. It is also good to specify that the territory of the Diocese of Rome is limited only to the Capital of Italy, because out of the city, in the Municipality of Rome, arise the suffragan dioceses. Quaeritur: was it therefore necessary, as an exotic experiment, to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon in the Mother and Mother Church of all the Catholic Churches? Therefore we note that while the Synod of Youth is being celebrated, the general rehearsals for the Amazon, from which the married priests will have to go out, ad experimentum, are already underway, because everything has already been established. I repeat: only ad experimentum and after convening the Pontifical Parliament of North Korea, where presumably dissidents end up on the heads of missiles fired during military exercises. Things are worse in Rome than in North Korea, never in the history of the Church has mercy made so many victims! A new term has also been born, not easily translatable: “i misericordiati“. And this term “misericordiati” rhymes with “giustiziati“, the sentenceds to death. . to open the video click on the image If Cardinal Gerhard L. Müller, in a recent long interview with Raymond Arroyo, has returned to various topics: on the speech of the evil friends who surround the Roman Pontiff, who were sought by him with the lantern of Diogenes; therefore on the argument that His Excellency Monsignor Carlo Maria Viganò, did not say anything other than the truth [Cf.. hIC, hIC], this happened because the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is a true man of God. Add to what the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, at the anthropological level, contains in himself the strength of the Teutonic barbarian, in the noblest sense of the term. In eo, we remember that when the barbarians descended from northern Europe while the Roman empire was in agony, they found the holders of power, drunk and made up by women, engaged in playing inside the alcoves with young men [Cf.. my previous article, hIC]. aut, in other words: the Romans, during the decadence of the Empire, lived a LBGT lifestyle that had long absorbed the S.P.Q.R. lifestyle, an acronym that once summarized the concept and foundation of Senatus Populus Quirites Romani and later Senatus PopulusQue Romanus [Senate of the Roman People]. The difference, as I have often emphasized, was that the barbarians, struck by the virile temperament of the great Fathers of the Church, in that climate of total decadence, they were converted, in mass, to Christianity. In today’s Rome, the new barbarians, from whom should they be conquered to Christianity? Perhaps by four homosexuals clinging like polyps to the throne, to which all in all they are very useful, being the most devoted ruffians, the most interested servants, the most efficient spies, as well as easily managed and manipulated by the sovereign, who knows, one after the other , all the rotten corpses that remain locked up in their graves? And their tombs are very different from those of the ancient Pharisees [Cf.. Mt 23, 27-32], because the tombs of the Pharisees were at least well painted on the outside. . I am afraid that no one has analyzed the historical relationship that links the psychology of Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller to the history of his native country, which is Germany. Today the situation of the visible Church is comparable to the defeat of Germany in 1945, with Adolf Hitler locked up in the bunker of Berlin, along with the restricted court of his faithful, while faced with the defeat, the German army continued to fight, up to enlist teenagers of sixteen. To deceive the German people, word spread that the Great Secret Weapon would soon be completed and used. In the same way, today, the main propagandists of Pontifical Pravda, not so much defend the indefensible — which can also be understandable and even justifiable on a human and psychological level — but show total insensitivity, while knowing all the details of the lives of many saints priests who have been totally marginalized and ruined, for not having accepted to become accomplices of a diabolical system of corruption, preferring to go to great suffering, without betraying the Church of Christ and coming to terms with evil. And this makes some Italian journalists of Pontificium Pravda, unscrupulous men, real criminals deprived of basic Christian sentiments. So it is good to inform these people that the bridge over the river now overflows with patients spectators who await the passage of their bodies dragged by the current, when with an ease that would scandalize even the lowest level whores, after the next conclave, like chameleons they will change skin color. The is that instead they will not have to change color, they will have to change jobs, because in the face of every sigh, all the writings with which they have sustained the untenable and defended the indefensible, to the detriment of the truth and the innocent affected and injured, will be taken and thrown publicly on their faces. These journalists of Pontifical Pravda have not even hesitated to falsify facts and news. They spread false news and concealed the truth to the detriment of the victims and the suffering of many holy priests. They “licked the ass” of the executioners, showing total indifference towards the victims affected and persecuted within the Church, of whom they knew very well the stories and the great sufferings. Et haec omnia, it is not simply inhumane, because it is really satanic. And the devil can never be allowed to enter through the window again, having thrown it out the door; and if by chance the Devil asks for forgiveness by pretending to be repentant, one must absolutely not believe him, because he is the Supreme Prince of Lies and deception. . After Adolf Hitler’s death, Germany was hit by a wave of suicides; whole families committed suicide. The most common phrase that ran between the good Germans which we remember were many — was: «I’m ashamed to be German». I have already heard this kind of phrase in private from bishops and presbyters many times: «Faced with this situation, I am ashamed to belong to this Church», implying that this shame is entirely linked to the ecclesial and ecclesiastical structure of this visible Church, certainly not to the mystery of the Church, which is the mystical Body of Christ. . As we know, from the Berlin bunker, we then moved on to the Nuremberg trial, where the main Nazi leaders were judged and condemned on the charred body of the Führer, but above all on the ruins of Germany. And many of the Nazi leaders were sentenced to death in that trial. Seventy-three years after the last great world war, the New Church of Mercy has removed the more remote and exceptional hypothesis of the death penalty from the Catechism. Ergo, if tomorrow something similar to the Nuremberg trial were to happen, we will be “merciful” to those responsible for the death of millions and millions of people, and we will entrust them to social services [Cf.. our previous articles: hIC, hIC, hIC]. . The Nuremberg trial is about to be repeated in the Church. Tomorrow, sooner or later, on the disastrous ruins of destruction, while bishops and priests will tell the world «I am ashamed to belong to this Church», we will see before the judges an army of cardinals and bishops who will try to justify themselves by saying: «I only obeyed higher orders!». While the journalists of the former Pontifical Pravda, who can no longer recycle themselves, will say on their side: «We have only written what we have been ordered to write!». Then the judges will ask: «Your Excellency … Your Eminence … Monsignor … but you realize that your obedience to the higher orders has covered the perpetrators of serious crimes and has seriously affected the innocent, subjected to every kind of suffering and anguish?» At that point the answer will be: «But I was bound by the pontifical secret!». . The death of Christ the Lord, in its substance, is renewed, and over time it is proposed in different ways. Not by chance, his glorious body, after the resurrection, still lives with the signs of passion. So today Christ died again on the cross because bishops and cardinals have «obeyed the higher orders», and when in the day of their judgment, God will ask them: «why did not you act in defense of the Church and of the People of God?». They will answer: «But I was bound by pontifical secrecy!». . It’s just a matter of little time. We let this monster give the last dangerous and deadly blows, because soon we will be in the great hall of Nuremberg, to listen to those directly responsible for the Holocaust of the Catholic Church that they say: «I have only obeyed the higher orders!». And we, precisely because of profound and authentic mercy, will guarantee them the expiatory grace of the gallows. Because we who today are suffering, anguished and persecuted in our home, we are the salvation and the future of the Church of Christ, of the pilgrim Church on earth. And no one will ever prevent us from fulfilling our mission for Christ, with Christ and in Christ. Because the church is of Christ, it is not of Peter, who is the Vicar of Christ, not his Successor. And the power given to Peter is not at all total and absolute as some would have us believe, indeed: it is a very vincolated power. The power of Peter is strictly vincolated to the deposit of the Catholic faith, of Tradition and of doctrine. Peter is not the absolute master of the Church, on the contrary: he is his first and faithful servant, called to guard the truth and to confirm his brothers in faith [Cf.. Lk 22, 31-34]. Peter’s mission, is not to convene the “democratic” Parliament of North Korea. Peter’s mission is not to confuse the People of God, using ambiguous and unclear words, because Christ teaches us: «Sed quod dicitur tua, “Ita, etiam” uel “No, nihil”; horum quicquam mali » [Cf.. Mt 5, 37]. . In Sancta Dei Evangelia,, omnibus manifestum est, ipsum, nec ulla “noctu clanculum devenit” quae semper nota parva insertas ut ambigua disserentem. Having said this, non est tamen necesse est ut,: ita vero, nullus sacerdos, tenetur episcopus cardinalis fortiter. Sed enim sacerdos, episcopi et cardinales, certe non est honoris magnorum et christianorum, qui ut lepus, contrariam sententiam historiae, respondit: «I only obeyed the higher orders». . Rome, 7 October 2018 . Ut non veniam lectores, si essent risu digna in translatione Latina. . . . . . «Et cognoscetis veritatem et veritas liberabit vos» [Gv 8,32], sed adducere, nedum veritatem diffundendam et defendendam sed metus in costs. Auxilium nostrum commenticium confirmaret Island cum ratio praebet per secure Coin Paypal: nec posse in computo: IT erant 08 J 02008 32974 001436620930 in hoc casu,, mitte nos an email Monitum, quia ripa Non potuimus mittere email vos praestate gratiarum actione percipitur [ firstname.lastname@example.org ] . . . .