Miagolose rumors for years sex cinema Seventy: alleged “papal heresies” on Communion for divorced, Cristina Siccardi the Savoy, Andrea Tornielli pilloried …

letters from readers 2

They say the island of Patmos Fathers

.

MIAGOLOSE ITEMS FROM CINEMA EROTIC SEVENTIES: ALLEGED "Heresies PAPAL" THE COMMUNION TO DIVORCED, CRISTINA SICCARDI THE SABAUDA, ANDREA TORNIELLI TO GOGNA …

.

there is no sin so serious, from which you can not break free and divine forgiveness. We should not assume that the divorced and remarried are always in a state of mortal sin. This would be a rash judgment, that would deny free will, as did Luther, and the power of divine grace.

.

.

Author John Cavalcoli OP
Author
John Cavalcoli, OP

.

.

PDF format Print article

.

.

Dear Father John.

The ban on communion for divorced and remarried is not a mere ecclesiastical law that the Pope can abolish, but it depends directly on the divine right, which requires a student to be in the grace of God to communion. For thus says the Council of Trent: "If anyone says that faith is sufficient preparation for receiving the sacrament of the Holy Eucharist, let him be anathema ".

Davide

.

.

Dear David,.

love joy 10
the post-synodal exhortation of the Holy Father Francis

The Pope has already explained in 'The joy of love that remarried divorcees, though it is in an irregular status, which strongly induces to sin and though they can also commit mortal sins, however, if they repent and do penance, They can regain the grace. That is why, in principle, They could go to Communion.

.

Remember that there is no sin so serious, from which you can not break free and divine forgiveness. We should not assume that the divorced and remarried are always in a state of mortal sin. This would be a rash judgment, that would deny free will, as did Luther, and the power of divine grace. If they fall into sin, they can always regain grace.

.

love joy 6
The Supreme Pontiff signed the Post-Synodal Exhortation

The Pope, once it was to give Communion to divorced and remarried in a canonically correct document, not attenterà to any divine law. Indeed, in this matter the divine laws in play are two: the law of the indissolubility of marriage and the sanctity of Holy Communion.

.

To understand the meaning of the ecclesiastical law change, that the Pope were to set about doing - the prohibition of Communion to the permission of the Communion -, We have to make the following considerations:

.

.

1) It should be noted an underlying theme, now it is known to all, which it is the basis of the pontificate of Pope Francis, and is that of mercy, understood here as research and willingness to do everything possible, even better than the past, to make available salvation to those who are most at risk. And it is the case of divorced and remarried along with many other cases.

2) It is true that God can save even without the Sacraments [cf. WHO]; but if you can open the door of the sacraments to a greater number of people available, without offending the dignity of the Sacraments, it's better, and indeed it is right;

3) Pope Francis invites us, on this issue, to turn our gaze in a different direction from that of the past. Up to San Giovanni Paolo II [CF. Family company n.84] The Church, about the problem of pastoral care for the divorced and remarried, he had under his eyes the dignity of the Sacrament and the public scandal given by the divorced and remarried (“It was irregular”, “public sinners”).

.

The reigning Pontiff, instead, without of course aside these considerations, It invites us to take rather that God may grant to remarried divorcees, in some cases - to be specified by the new law -, to be in grace, despite their irregular status.

.

4) The granting of the Holy Communion in those particular cases would not be offensive to the sacrament of marriage, but it would safeguard the dignity, although in different ways and even it is contrary to what so far has followed the ministry to divorced and remarried.

.

love, joy, 2
the post-synodal exhortation of the Holy Father Francis

This is the most difficult point to understand. The moral principle says so: "One and the same moral law, intelligently interpreted, It can be applied in ways materially inconsistent, depending on the circumstances'.

.

Take the case of the commandment Do not kill. Just this command allows you to kill the unjust aggressor, but there is not space here to explain this apparent paradox, for which reference to a treatise of moral theology.

.

Regarding our case, we can then say that the law of the indissolubility of marriage may continue to be respected in certain circumstances, not only with the prohibition of Communion, but also by making it, provided that the divorced and remarried are in a particular situation, to be specified by the new law.

.

.

.

Author Father Ariel
Author
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

Father Ariel Caro.

This war on the field of the Communion for divorced and remarried is getting stronger. Some say that you should not obey the Pope because it is wrong. Then I wonder: who can judge if the Pope is wrong, do not obey him and invite to disobey? I, as a woman, as well as Piedmontese, I am irritated by certain comments carbolic covered with honey written by Cristina Siccardi on various blogs, then cited by others as a truth of faith. This writer is probably a star of theology? As a priest, how she reacts, in front of certain subjects?

daisy Altieri

.

.

dear Margaret.

edwige-fenech-the-doctor-of-district military
Edwige Fenech, film poster The doctor of the military district, left Alvaro Vitali, very talented stage actor discovered by Federico Fellini. But how he had this to say: « … the theater is an art that does not pay, while with light flicks I could support his family »

Years ago I explained in my book that everyone is able to obey an authority figure with a strong personality, spirituality and holiness of life, but this is not the challenge of faith addressed to priests and religious, nor to lay Catholic. The challenge is to obey a bishop or major superior to a fragile, limited and mediocre, provided that he does not command things contrary to the doctrine and the Magisterium of the Church and do not use its authority to commit crimes and offenses, because in that case you are required to disobey imperative for the Christian conscience and to inform the supreme ecclesiastical authority of its abuses, order is restored justice violated.

.

where the Roman Pontiff He gives me a wrong order and I was aware of what, First I would try to convince him of the error and demonstrate the substantial mistake the given command, But if it were to maintain in this case the eseguirei, unless it was not contrary to the Deposit of Faith and Catholic morality. He said this would add: I do not know who can demonstrate how many commands given by the Roman Pontiffs in the course of Church history results are in conflict with Deposit of Faith and Catholic morality, because I personally do not know of any case.

.

Why is it better to make a mistake to make an order that may appear incorrectly, instead of making the right choice by disobeying the Roman Pontiff? Because in the second case the error would be more and more serious. Then the Roman Pontiff will have to answer before men and history, but especially before God, if it had imposed the wrong order.

.

glory-guide-to-schooler
Cover the film The high-school student, with Gloria Guida in a fancy school in Cinecittà …

state this, and maybe blind obedience in contrast with the logic, free will and human dignity, as some tend to believe, marching on those “good intentions” whose streets are paved Hell? anything, assert that means to proceed on the path of prudent wisdom. The Roman Pontiff in fact enjoys a special assistance of the Holy Spirit, therefore a grace which was not enjoyed by individual bishops, priests and even lay Catholics. If in the history of the Church has no memory of erroneous commands imposed by contrasting with the Popes Deposit of Faith and Catholic morality, Instead they have abundant evidence of how right they later were seen in the years ahead of the choices on the spot hotly contested. This is based on the obedience of Christi fideles and Ministers in sacris : the prudent and wise understanding that the Roman Pontiff has a special grace of state and entitled to special assistance of the Holy Spirit that makes it infallible in matters of doctrine and faith [refer to the article of John Cavalcoli: The tasks and the degrees of the infallibility of the Supreme Pontiff, WHO]. And who does not accept this, assuming, if anything, to be invested for greater grace was the power of judgment on certain decisions of the Roman Pontiff on matters of doctrine and faith, or is a heretic, or simply a fool, I saw that the heresy in itself calls for intelligence and talent. And if you always heretics I take them seriously with due respect, fools take them instead around …

.

The reigning Pontiff, that "deserves" respectful criticism with the devotion due to the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles and Vicar of Christ on earth, He has never given orders, in no act of their supreme magisterium, which are contrary to Catholic faith and morals; and whoever claims otherwise shows at best not to be able to make elementary distinctions between private doctor, the ordinary pastoral ministry, the supreme Magisterium of Peter. Or better understood: It is shown not to know the basics of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, then giving rise to questions only intended to disorient and simple to sow the poison of confusion among the people of God [I refer to my previous article, WHO].

.

For this I have never raised the issue "This Pope we do not like" [Gnocchi & Palmaro, cf. WHO], and I never fell into the traps of some strong criticism in this pontificate, brandishing towards it charges more or less subtle heresy, formulated through the theories served up by overt heretics unrepentant, how those Lefebvre to be discovered in the aforementioned Christian Siccardi recalled from our Reader, and to which I come now with joy and happiness …

.

nadia-cassini-the-teacher-dance-with-all-the-class
Nadia Cassini, film poster The teacher dances with the whole class. Top another great actor of Italian theater: Renzo Montagnani [1930-1997]. He, too, had this to say: "In Italy with the theater he caught you hunger, with light flicks you shop for the home kitchen '

… I do not know who this Lady who writes about Siccardiana correspondence, already Correspondence Romana, on which occasionally has delighted readers with articles rose on the Royal House of pirates, anticlerical Freemasons and these were the Savoy [cf, WHO, WHO, etc..], or on levied Siccardiana, already Levied Christian, where articles are published every year to commemorate with the tear to the eye of that figure holy man Benito Mussolini [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO etc..]. At this point I note passing, before proceeding over, at what levels reach the spirit of these people that thunder for two years against any sacrilege of communion for divorced and remarried persons, including accusations of heresy and some columnist who even invites to resist with disobedience to the Supreme Pontiff. Well, despite their rigor toward adultery and cohabitees, to keep as far away from these Eucharistic canteens, If the adulterer is however the former Duce of Italy, married with children, or her lover and accomplice close friend in adultery, heard what sweetness and Christian charity express the tender souls of levied Siccardiana:

.

"The exact circumstances, the place, time, where they were killed Mussolini and Claretta Petacci, whose only crime was love for Duce, It was in turn covered by a part of history that had a vested interest in spreading a stereotyped vision of events in which there was very little decent and honest " [cf. WHO].

.

poster-completely-melted
Poster of the film busted, gassed completely melted, behind Edwige Fenech actor Enrico Maria Salerno [1926-1994] famous for being one of the greatest actors of the Italian theater of the most gifted in the interpretation of many different roles

Oh, poor Claretta, sweet unhappy creature, considered by bloody rabble partisan and by historical dishonest guilty of having given to adultery with Benito Mussolini. In fondo, what's wrong? What's wrong, to love a married man, husband and father of four children?

.

Once written similar amenities, the same people then go to comb through old articles of the Vatican correspondent Andrea Tornielli, these days in the pillory because “reo” It had reported the news reports about the events of the IOR Ettore Gotti Tedeschi and so “uneven” the antecedents of 2013 [cf. WHO]. Well, to give 2013 to the 2016 the accounts given by the Holy See or by the Archbishop Georg Gänswein it differs, It is not the fault of the Vatican correspondent who reported the facts as they were presented, but who over time has changed version. This is perhaps a Vatican “guilty” not to have pointed out this discrepancy, as Roberto de Mattei says so right on a formal level [cf. WHO]? I honestly do not know which of us, He is having written in the space of three years beyond 200 goods, can remember the precise passage and the exact detail of one of them; What this is true of all the publicists, but for all, including Andrea Tornielli working alone, What I doubt rather face Roberto de Mattei, on the basis of a simple calculation based on his writings and activities. Indeed, Roberto de Mattei, He is engaged as an academic at the European University, Director of Correspondence Romana, director of the monthly Christian roots, director of Lepanto Foundation, promoter March for Life, consultant to several institutions, author of an average of two articles per week with extra articles published also on La Repubblica and The Gazette, author of two books a year, He engaged in numerous appearances as a lecturer in Italy and abroad … it is not by chance that this man of the help of collaborators ready to seek benefits sighs and commas of articles written to three years away from a Vatican expert who works alone, so all in all honest and without paleologiimpallinatori on its payroll? Come, you monsters to Andrea Tornielli least the same pity that certain subjects show for Benito Mussolini and Claretta Petacci sweet, which it was not - as many might think, obviously wrong - his mistress, her his concubine, she who helped him to commit adultery at the expense of the legitimate wife Donna Rachele. Absolutely not! Claretta was the only woman who "loved the Duce" and that perhaps the columnists of levied Siccardiana they would not hesitate to admit to the sacraments, together with all well-known womanizer of the House of Savoy, including the last king of Italy, Umberto II, an "honest man" dear to the pink of journalism Siccardi [cf. WHO], also separated from his wife and a nidata of children along with their children have plunged this house of pirates ridicule of the tabloid press and deserved the talk show television [see the last glorious heir to the House of Savoy, video WHO].

.

poster-l-teacher
film poster The teacher, with the inevitable Edwige Fenech and Alvaro Vitali

… But back to the Siccardi, whose crass ignorance, with regard to the Church's history and fundamental theology, to me indeed to spare. And it's not my judgment ungenerous, because such crass ignorance oozes from his books, articles and video-conferences, which are public documents, non-confidential material or material covered by Privacy Act. But since you can bacchettare the reigning Pontiff up to accuse him of heresy, I just want to see if it is not to criticize this lady claims the legitimate freedom to bacchettare like a conductor the entire teaching of the Church of the last fifty years, again according to his books and articles, I repeat that public acts are and shall remain. Therefore worth revisited told: “Who acid injures die by acid”.

.

I was then asked how I react before certain figures. To understand this it should first be given that I am not only the son of Dante Alighieri, but also by Giovanni Boccaccio, Pietro Aretino, Cecco Angiolieri and so. Accordingly, They say they are not accustomed take seriously some people, I tend to make fun of them and the Profitable circulate the tradiProtestants which they are derived in part their place in the sun and part of their publishing market, between halberdiers boasting quarters of nobility among the laces&laces of Masses in the ancient rite and aspiring Contessine by Liala novel that poignant recollections of the House of Savoy. I prefer to throw it into a joke, also because this lady from the voice miagolosa, It reminds me of certain actresses erotic film of the seventies. Obviously I am referring to the item, mind you: only to the Voice. Also because we are talking about a sex cinema that nowadays is accordingly punished and modest point that these old films could be screened in cinemas schools for children of the Daughters of Mary Help of Christians.

.

lilli-carat-the-teacher-of-sciences-natural
Lilli Carati, film poster Professor of Natural Sciences. Also in the program of this lightweight comedy, stand out the names of some of the largest and most talented actors of the Italian theater of the twentieth century

Hearing the voice miagolosa the Siccardi - Objective observation, certainly not irreverent mockery [cf. audio WHO] - I have come back to the mind of the actresses who also spoke with voices miagolose : Edwige Fenech ago The doctor of the military district [cf. WHO]; Glory in the shoes of the Guide night nurse [cf. WHO], Nadia Cassini in the shoes of Professor dancing with the whole class [cf. WHO], to follow with other actresses and soubrette who troubled the sleep of most of us, today fifties, in the seventies when we were teenagers, children in our turn of healthy fathers whose sleep was rather upset in their teens from the image of Wanda Osiris, who wore dresses much more monastic than those worn today by rebel American nuns who have had unfortunate as teachers and spiritual directors the Jesuits of the new East India Company. Even for this many years later we became healthy priests, fell into the world of faith and the real, pace of prudish Lefebvre theater that one out fragrance virginity of heretics which in itself and by itself is more impure adultery [cf. WHO].

.

I can not conclude this survey of actresses from voice miagolosa forgetting the beautiful and unhappy Lilli Carati, born Ileana Caravati [1956-2014 – cf. WHO, WHO] I will keep a poignant reminder, while avendoci spoken once, after the disease that tore the life had been diagnosed in 2014, meeting her by chance at a cancer center where I had gone to visit a friend who was in a state now terminal. It would be nice to be able to tell what appeared mild and Christian cross the mind of this woman who was preparing to end his life after a long series of bad choices, but it is those talks and remember that a priest must bring with him to the grave. As the tender conversation I had years ago in Ladispoli, while I was a guest of friends, with that soul as unhappy as beautiful Laura Antonelli [1941-2015], that was an icon of beauty and eroticism, now of poor health and physically destroyed, to which I gave a rosary blessed by the Holy Father, before which he bursts into tears of joy.

.

poster-duck-all-orange
The poster for the film The duck à l'orange, main protagonists of this film of the seventies two sacred monsters the theater and the Italian cinema: Monica Vitti and Ugo Tognazzi. In 1975 the vision of the film was banned in theaters for children under 14 years because he could see from a distance a small glimpse of the backside of Barbara Buochet, although it was more prudish of certain images painted within our baroque churches. So it worked in that period, except, however, jump to the other extreme a few years later, when primetime Rai offered a butcher by so much per pound [cf. WHO] …

Who is Cristina Siccardi I then try his writings on the bizarre historical and theological level, and his lectures were built on ignorance castles. Instead about how to take it, I would say that could be taken as one that miagola in lefebvriano, while in his rambling lectures enhances the confused and stubborn Bishop Marcel Lefebvre comparing it to the Holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church Athanasius of Alexandria, ie equating facto the Second Vatican Council to the Arian heresy [cf. WHO, WHO].

.

Even more so back with human and pastoral tenderness to my mind the memory of the suffering soul of Lilli Carati, ready to admit their past mistakes, those austere papessa lefebvriana as Siccardi would never admit, ie of being wrong for indomitable pride to self-elect to the rank of expert spin doctors in complex and sensitive subjects such as the history of the Church, dogmatic sacramental, canon law and so on, knowing the hurt the Catechism of St. Pius X, and acting accordingly versus the Church instead in Church, versus instead of Pietro under Peter. All because it presumed to be not only a true Catholic, but the Almighty dealership that owns the authentic truth of the Mystery, just like the boutique d'owns the exclusive license for the sale of intimate Via Monte Napoleone in Milan baby doll and guèpiére Christian Dior.

.

I “immoral moralists that the result of the Siccardi and related they tear their garments for months about the danger "heretical"Communion for divorced and remarried, to forget their obvious convenience that the first of the deadly sins, It has always been considered the queen of all the deadly sins, not lust, but pride. And this does not teach him the "diabolical secret meeting"Vatican II, to which, as stated by the Siccardi, the heroic Marcel Lefebvre resisted like St. Athanasius of Alexandria opposed the Arian heresy; This teaches the Blessed and always very valuable Catechism of St. Pius X, that they know and teach only when it's convenient to them and where it suits them, to support a pseudo-Catholic ideology increasingly grim, certainly not the Catholic unhappy and unorthodox book published recently by Cardinal Walter Kasper to the praise of Luther [see article by John Cavalcoli, WHO]. This Cardinal is undoubtedly a pro-Protestant and an irreducible rahneriano, with an incorrect theological vision of ecclesiology and ecumenism; in his thought they contain several of the major mistakes of modernism and perhaps it is also the direct proponent of some bad advice given to the Supreme Pontiff, but he would never dare to accuse Peter of heresy or apostasy from the Catholic faith, or break the unity of the Church. This is why, if it really was led to a forced choice with no possibility of rejection, as a devoted son of the Church and devoted priest always I will choose Kasper, never Lefebvre and meows of their acidic kittens and cute that wiggle Masses in the ancient rite, among Halberdiers boasting quarters of nobility and countesses aspirants beatificano not worth the ridiculous historical calamity that was to Italy and the Catholic Church lamented their House of Savoy, advocate of anti-ecclesiastical laws passed by the House of Savoy under the legislative model of Napoleon Bonaparte, as well as written under the direct dictation of Freemasons. All this happened at a time when, at the Royal Senate and the Royal Chamber of Deputies of the Kingdom of Italy, Senators and MEPs state that it was Pius IX calling "pig" and the Pope Leo XIII calling "shitty bone». This is so, if the painful novel siccardiano alla recently per aspiring Contessine dreamy, we want to go instead to the serious historical analysis, What this requires first of all that educated people, competent and above series. E la vera culture, the true knowledge and the true seriousness, born and proceed from the rejection of the arrogance and the extraordinary virtue of humility that leads to listening, What unfortunately impossible for those who hear only the reasons for yourself and then change the first absolute truths, then closed ideologies and aggressive.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Avatar

About isoladipatmos

13 thoughts on "Miagolose rumors for years sex cinema Seventy: alleged “papal heresies” on Communion for divorced, Cristina Siccardi the Savoy, Andrea Tornielli pilloried …

  1. First, thanks for the posters. I do not remember the most. Wanting to be very magnanimous (on the other hand this is the era of mercy, and I fit myself), I would say that if we compare them to the vulgar and hard exhibitionism of our days seem a tasteful masterpiece. And, from a purely technical point of view, I would say that perform best with their sinuous and insinuating feminine softness the task of awakening a healthy virility in males above the age of fifteen. What the para-pornography today fails to make, because it has forgotten that the fire of sexuality is not only in the body: for this last way you end up straight in the perversions.
    Without this important premise, I just remember the ranks “traditionalist” anti-bergogliana of St. Athanasius fans that he, in his battle against Arianism, It was always on the side of the bishop of Rome while the Arian party was often coincides with that of the Emperor, as heretics, as evidence the story of Luther, always end up being tools of worldly power.

    1. Dear Zamax.

      L 'eros, or the so-called erotic dimension, It evolves and is transformed in the course of time, up to make it morally licit what up till then had had rather immoral as expression of indecency.

      What I meant to point through certain posters - and there seems to be managed – what it is the moral costumes evolve over time, Also within a few years.
      Today, posters like those of certain "erotic" films of the Seventies, They are really the chaste films suitable for parish cinemas.

      Perhaps many do not know it, but in the fifties of the twentieth century, watching a lot of movies in black and white by Antonio De Curtis, Totò, was considered immoral and therefore sinful. In some of these films were, if anything, some actresses with some pronounced cleavage, or dressed in tight-fitting dresses that left to imagine the sinuosity of their forms, but always and dressed rigor. Today, those movies, you can safely buy on DVD from Catholic bookstores of the Pauline Sisters, the same as in the fifties spread the weekly Famiglia Cristiana in which he had devoted a special section to the list of advised film and then prohibited the vision of the good Catholic, namely those films that today they sell in their libraries.

      the glorious Famiglia Cristiana, dedicated fire items, in the early seventies, to discourage the vision, and in particular young people, of the film Jesus Christ Superstar. Today the movie you can buy in their libraries, but wanting no more: some priests, believed to be the most refined intellectuals, three years ago it projected during Holy Week on the presbytery of a Sicilian cathedral church.
      I must proceed further with similar examples, however all of them documented?

      I will try to explain with another example again, an example castigatissimo most chastised you can not.
      In August I met a couple of sisters who were dressed in white, with a dress that reached barely cover the knee, the top gown with short sleeves, the headscarf, which obviously let discover the hair on half a head, with clogs, obviously without socks.
      Needless to say: in the fifties of the twentieth century, or in any case until the end of the sixties, see the sisters dressed like that would have been unthinkable; It would be a scandal of enormous proportions, although for twenty years before women had shortened her skirts to the knee, but they had shortened the secular women, certainly not the nuns.
      The beauty is that I too, dressed in white like those nuns, with my summer cassock, unlike them I had a long dress up your heels (hence the name of cassock, from Latin talus), obviously Long Sleeve, with a high collar 5 cm, with shoes and socks at the foot.

      I sincerely, hot or not hot, see the sisters dressed like that do not like, like we do not like to see priests in shorts and T-shirts with short sleeves, because I do not think decent for the sacred priesthood image.

      Faced with such a "laxity" by the men and women religious, or the priests I saw coming in the summer several times in the sacristy in shorts and slippers at the foot, bless you with all my heart the posters of the film chastised "erotic" of the seventies, because in their skits, Alvaro Vitali and the beautiful Edwige Fenech, tear many smiles, Today, however, without any malice, view precisely the evolution of morals that there has been. Quite the contrary, the priests who are in the sacristy to prepare themselves for Holy Mass dressed in T-shirt with short sleeves, shorts and slippers at the foot, so those that make me angry, because they are really indecent, however without any hilarious and fun size "erotic".

      As for Saint Athanasius bishop of Alexandria, you are absolutely right. And to give her a hand to that effect, I add another: she manages to imagine how such a man as the Holy Pontiff Pius X, decanted at every turn by those impropriamenti “Traditionalists” and related, He would react in front of people who put into question not only the papal authority, but even the relevance of the documents of an entire ecumenical council?

      The problem of these people, It is that you have created a St. Pius V has never existed, a Blessed Pius IX incorrispondente to reality, but above all a St. Pius X that before a harvest-signatures against a final decision taken by the Roman Pontiff orchestrated by a group of lay Catholics, He would have given orders to all the bishops and parish priests of Italy never to return as some people in the churches until they had not publicly asked forgiveness with ashes on his head and knees flexed.

      But then, when you do not live in the present, some people are scrambling to change the reality of the story and characters from the past, but “beatification” as “gentlemen” even those ruffians of the Kings of the House of Savoy.

      1. On the issue of the posters I could not resist the temptation to joke. In fact I agree with you on the evolving nature of the costumes, and somewhere I also wrote that – at least indirectly – it was precisely and only Christianity that has undressed the woman with full awareness. After all this process has meant “svestire” gradually the woman's body from the image of sin. A long educational process from the party that teaching the gospel that tells us that it is often the eye that is scandalous man, not what it sees. For nuns and priests of course the question is different. Theirs is not simply a dress, It is not even a sign of belonging to a religion: It is a religious habit. That the confusion is so great it shows the matter of burkinis, He compared by many improperly religious dress of the nuns, that with all their evidence have not recognized as such.

  2. This I have to tell …
    Years ago, along elderly priest (now in heaven), of which I was the assistant pastor in Neapolitan coastal area, during an evening held in the territory of our parish, He was also present Mrs. Fenech as a guest.
    Dear, a great lady.
    The already then senior pastor, when he greeted her made her laugh by telling: “Mrs. Fenech, that honor to meet you in person. knew … she has disturbed us generations of teenagers. Of, in those years, how much work has given us confessors !!”.

  3. Dear don Ariel,
    a laugh will bury us? Beyond the jokes from comic-erotic films 70s, I fully share his message.
    As expected, in this particular ecclesial moment, the liturgical topic (that is strangely set aside in the Holy Father's speeches) He is king: Pasdaran of the Pius V Missal are opposed to Hizbollah of the conciliar reform, with paradoxical results and in some similar verses. Each with idolatry silk chasubles, others with the rite reductions improvisations, trivializing or even baroque teatralizzazioni (heterogenesis ends) recalling that "Pope Francis wants humility and poverty". An example: http://www.ilgazzettino.it/nordest/treviso/show_chiesa_ferrari_parroco_giacometti_godego-1934845.html
    I personally believe that the motu proprio “Popes” It has been disastrous, but I also wonder if the current and widespread liturgical trivialization, far from wanting to be attributed to the spirit of Sacrosanctum Concilium, rather than being an explicit tool for those who want to adapt the Church today to modernism and various protestantismi (perhaps in view of the 31 October p.v….). What do you think? Thanks for the answer.

  4. Lei says:
    'You should not assume that remarried divorcees are always in a state of mortal sin. This would be a rash judgment, that would deny free will, as did Luther, and the power of divine grace. If they fall into sin, they can always regain grace.’

    Ma la Familiaris Consortio dice:
    'The church, however, It reiterates its practices, based on Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced and remarried. … There is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church's teaching on the indissolubility of marriage.’

    I understand that here is of that never remarried divorcees can access the Eucharist. Or being a practice the Pope can modify it to particular cases?
    The second part puzzles me: I do not give you the Eucharist not to confuse others. If I'm not in mortal sin to deny me a sacrament as the’ Eucharist because someone might confuse? I do not understand (but hopefully I adapt). Being a pastoral reason a pope could decide to eliminate…

    1. Dear Henry.

      The reason for which the Family company excludes remarried divorcees from Communion is indeed the intent to prevent the couple give scandal to the faithful, They may be tempted to doubt or to despise the indissolubility of marriage.

      His remark, according to which this does not seem sufficient reason to exclude from the Communion a couple who might be in the grace, just because it would bring scandal, it's important.

      And indeed, I think this consideration, although not the only, is the basis of the fact that, at least as it appears from the Pope's letter to the Argentinean Bishops, he is directing to grant communion to divorced and remarried, even if it will stand the pope to determine the special cases, in which it will be allowed.

  5. Dear Fathers,

    The Church, especially under Pope Francis, I think particularly more concerned to reabsorb at all costs marriage situations of the divorced and remarried, rather than to increase virility in men and women in femininity, that is, to ensure that the pairs do not should divorce. Rather, on how to ensure that marriages are solid and fruitful. And this is because the Church favors the consumer society, rather than be his alternative. Let me explain here:
    https://lafilosofiadellatav.wordpress.com/2016/04/03/amoris-laetitia-e-la-ruvida-realta/.
    That said, I understand that you you support the position that if Francesco seems wrong in his innovations in AL, But since he is acting under the influence of the Spirit, it is good to bring obedience to his teaching, because the current concerns will be clarified over time, When it will prove his foresight.
    They would therefore wrong Spaemann, which http://sinodo2015.lanuovabq.it/spaemann-amoris-laetitia-e-in-rottura-con-il-magistero-precedente/,

    1. Dear Reader.

      I am preparing an article for our page Theologically in which I try to explain that today, the great test to which we are subjected, It is the great test of faith, in which we are tested in a moment of confusion, confusion and above all intra-ecclesial decay, without historical precedent.

    2. Just a note off topic.
      “And this is because the Church favors the consumer society, rather than be his alternative.” I point out to the reader “piertoussaint” that the Church in the last half century has always been very critical of the “consumer society”, and the Pope Francesco guide against it began to shoot real guns. So what do we do? In my opinion it was very confused offensive also caused by the use of most lovely concepts as capitalism, liberalism or precisely consumerism, nature mostly sociological or political propaganda. old story, moreover. For instance, the concept of “capitalism” basically born with Marx. The opponents “Liberals” Socialism made the serious mistake of accepting the enemy's language in defending “capitalism”. Even in the public eye were thus confronted two “system” or two forms of materialism. And also there were born on misunderstandings “third way”, which today still we carry with us, so much so that even the clearest Rerum Novarum is improperly defined (see Wikipedia) “via media between capitalism and…

      1. Dear Zamax,

        the point is just that, as usual: the Church only in words was against the consumer society, but not in practice, otherwise we would not be in the miserable condition in which we are now. Not to be left on the generic, I propose again the contents of which link to my previous intervention:
        https://lafilosofiadellatav.wordpress.com/2016/04/03/amoris-laetitia-e-la-ruvida-realta/
        to which I add the terms of the servitude of Avvenire, edited by CEI, to the powers that bankrupts Keynesians, which
        https://lafilosofiadellatav.wordpress.com/avvenire-il-detto-male-e-il-non-detto-del-quotidiano-di-ispirazione-cattolica/
        it's here
        https://lafilosofiadellatav.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/paolo-viana-su-avvenire-il-quotidiano-e-attendibile-su-infrastrutture-e-project-financing-brebemiteem/
        As for the guns of Pope Francis, those are blanks, as rightly observed Stefano Fontana, which
        http://www.lanuovabq.it/it/articoli-il-pastoralismo-malattia-infantile-del-catto-pietismo-14939.htm
        about bad-pietism without decent content in terms of subsidiarity and authentic popular participation in power.

      2. But I would have to conclude, dear Zamax, with a known positive MOOLTO, for all those who read us, namely that the famous “third way” of which you speak really exists, although unfortunately still unknown to most- the time is not yet ripe – and it consists in “participatory society” according to the Social Doctrine. And’ a complete system, organic, which is also the “Rerum Novarum” to quote, processed by a great intellectual of the '900, unfortunately remained in the shadow… a certain Pier Luigi Zampetti:

        http://www.rassegnastampa-totustuus.it/cattolica/?p=26847

        ;-)))

Leave a Reply to Don Ciro Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters remaining

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.