.
.
Dear Readers,
as our loyal know, The island of Patmos It has management costs that always supports with your offers.
first of all take this opportunity to thank all those who supported us and allowed so far to cover these expenses, especially those who, monthly, They always send their contributions.
To those who might intend to offer their valuable support for our apostolic work, We propose to do a monthly subscription in favor of The island of Patmos, even for a few Euros, using the convenient and safe system PayPal
God reward you.
.
.
.
Our Holy Father said quote: "Invoke the Spirit because it is, and in the bread and wine there is Jesus. ", sentence did not believe few Gospel that the Church is aligning their positions.
It is one thing to say it: “… in the bread and wine there is Jesus”,
another saying: “… the bread and the wine is Jesus”.
Maybe you say: “,,, in the street there is Jesus”,
is to say: “… the way Jesus”?
Modern man's benefit, Compared to the ancients know some more science and less metaphysical, I find it useful to explicitly say that the accidental appearances of bread and wine are not only their outward appearance immediately perceptible, but also their molecular and atomic structure observable with scientific instruments such as microscope, reagents etc.. In short, the Eucharistic miracle (improperly miracle, because the miracle is such as visible) It has nothing to do with an alchemical mutation of the molecular structure of matter, to the consecrated host electron microscope it does not reveal anything different.
“… the Eucharistic miracle (improperly miracle, because the miracle is such as visible) It has nothing to do with an alchemical mutation of the molecular structure of matter, to the consecrated host electron microscope it does not reveal anything different…”
but then what changes? no accidents… what you see, color, flavor etc.… there alchemical mutation of the molecular structure of matter… not the atoms that constitute the molecule… no neutrons, the protons and the electrons that constitute the atoms… and so on … and what changes? better Luther: does not change anything, but it adds the Christ…
I find it disturbing that we should celebrate the fact that the Pope “confirm Tradition”, as if it were an exceptional event and not the “minimum wage” that one should expect
Substance, damn it, noumeni, transubstantiation… Gesù si esprime così? Ma non è più giusto tornare al Vangelo, a tutte le parole che ha pronunciato Gesù, non limitandosi alla frase “this is my body”. Es.: “Io sono il pane di vita”, “il pane disceso dal cielo”, “il pane è la mia carne per la vita del mondo”? E poi cosa c’entra la scienza dell’uomo moderno e la chimica? Se aveste fede quanto un granello di sabbia sapreste che Dio può far nascere figli di Abramo dai sassi. Il papa è un uomo di fede e bene fa a non dare alcun rilievo a parole che Gesù non ha mai detto nè mai si sarebbe sognato di pronunciare ai suoi discepoli. Dio non ha bisogno della Teologia.