Rocco Buttiglione: a thinker at the crossroads of Amoris Laetitia and Thomism
Latest posts by Drafting (see all)
- Who is Marco Felipe Perfetti referring to when he states from the Silere Non Possum website «here in the Vatican … us in the Vatican", if he can't even set foot in the Vatican? - 8 December 2023
- The Archabbot emeritus of Montecassino Pietro Vittorelli has died: pity can erase the sad truth? - 14 October 2023
- “miss Universe”. The island of Patmos deals with beauty because it is a manifest expression of God and his gifts in human history - 10 July 2023
Can anyone clarify some doubts?
When Jesus says that “whoever looks at a woman lustfully, He has already committed adultery with her in his heart”, I want to say that adultery is a subjective sin: then why so much insistence in wanting to assimilate adultery objectivity of sexual intercourse?
It is not adultery the loss of a shareholder assumed before God?
But if then the unconditional faithfulness of God's covenant with man is called, nellafi, Mercy, how it can appeal to the Mercy who does not keep a pact with a fellow? (Mt 18.23-35)
Refutation of the article with the words of the four cardinal
"The question of admission to the sacraments of objective judgment about the life situation of the person and not the judgment that this person is in a state of mortal sin. In fact subjectively MAY NOT FULLY ATTRIBUTABLE ** , or DON'T BE FOR ANYTHING. "
E
"The question 3 of "dubia" would thus clarify whether, even after "Amoris laetitia", you can still say that people who usually live in contradiction to the commandment of God's law live in the objective situation of grave habitual sin, though, for some reason, It IS NOT CERTAIN THAT THEY ARE SUBJECTIVE RESULTING for their usual transgression ".
It is evident that there is no connection between this and the arguments dall'articolista.
The article from which I took the words of the cardinal is this http://www.scuolaecclesiamater.org/2016/11/la-mancata-risposta-ai-dubia-sullamoris.html?m=1 and contradicts dell'articolista in full the argument that those people can not but be in mortal sin and without the Grace of God.
Actually even the cardinal of Dubia hann stated that the divorced and remarried can not be subjectively attributable and then in the grace of God despite their habitual sin.
From here http://www.scuolaecclesiamater.org/2016/11/la-mancata-risposta-ai-dubia-sullamoris.html
"Like this, for Statement, the question of admission to the sacraments of objective judgment about the life situation of the person and not the judgment that this person is in a state of mortal sin. In fact subjectively MAY NOT FULLY ATTRIBUTABLE ** , or DON'T BE THAT FOR ANYTHING. "
E
"The question 3 of "dubia" would thus clarify whether, even after "Amoris laetitia", you can still say that people who usually live in contradiction to the commandment of God's law live in the objective situation of grave habitual sin, though, for some reason, It IS NOT CERTAIN THAT THEY ARE SUBJECTIVE RESULTING for their usual transgression ".
They will have it all wrong too, At that time.
Given that the Holy Father, for the power of the keys, It can determine who has access and who does not in the Eucharist (Jesus has perhaps denied “his Body” Judas?), I think that the AT problem is to assimilate certain negative precepts to the positive precepts and then apply both to valid standards for positive precepts;
an example:
– in AL 301 we read that “one subject, while knowing well the norm, It can have great difficulty in understanding "values inherent in the moral norm”,
– however the FC (33) It specifies that these considerations apply to standards that indicate a way forward, Which “the divine law on transmitting life and that on fostering authentic married love”, and certainly not to norna prohibiting, without ifs and buts, adultery.
I believe that such a “operation” It is also favored by No. 62 AL, where we read that “The indissolubility of marriage (Mt 19,6), It is not primarily intended as a "yoke" imposed on men, but as a "gift" made to persons married”: it was written that His “yoke is”, certain moderniste drifts would find less fertile soil.
Thank you, kind prof. Kerže!…
E’ all clear, I also understand a child:
“…we could say: the divorced rested which commits adultery for fear of being left mortal sin because she is operating in the active power of practical reason, esigendo e rendendole immediatamente possibile la conoscenza del divieto di adulterio ed ― essendo un precetto negativo ― dell’applicazione di esso al suo caso individuale”.
Elementary, Angelic Doctor… the d.r. in the example quoted, as an adult and vaccinated, He must decide between the compromise now, or the dubious salvation of his soul, on Judgment Day. Hand her this harsh but inescapable reality, Now, Mercy is, create them erroneous alibi is false misericordismo.
It comes also to say, what you are talking about?… Years tiresome discussions about philosophical razor wire, to deny what looks a manifest reality?… The blame for all this lost time (while there is much real work to do), in reality, It is ambiguous extender Amoris laetitia, and its supporters, as the Byzantine prof. Buttiglione…