Because the Virgin Mary did not ask for euthanasia of Jesus Christ on the cross, as it will allow the government of Joseph Conte, child prodigy of Villa Nazareth? But for the Vatican Secretariat of State and the Italian bishops the real problem was Matteo Salvini exhibiting the rosary in the square
Latest posts by father ariel (see all)
- "Something is changed". From Jack Nicholson to Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi honorary degree from the University of Catania - 14 April 2024
- The fans of Mary co-redemptrix, a gross contradiction in theological terms - 6 February 2024
- A good priest is such if he waits for the end of his mandate to praise his Bishop: Andrea Turazzi, from today Bishop emeritus of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro - 3 February 2024
Forgive me Mr. Oronzo but theology comes after, Allow me to attach a note from treccani which clarifies the different positions between deism and theism.
deismo s. m. [by fr. the same, the. del years. God 'dio']. - In general, orientation of thought that recognizes the existence of God as the first cause, Creator and organizer of the world: this belief (that, established by natural reason, immortality of the soul together constitute the core of the natural religion), although not, in many ways, in contrast with theological positions of the Christian churches, historically it assumes - along the sec. 17° and above all in the 18th - a polemical meaning against historical religions, the churches, against the idea of revelation or mystery, in the name of reason and freedom of conscience. The term, often used as sinon. theism, actually it has meaning today sharply distinguished from this, especially through the work of Kant, who considers deism as tied to an idea of God purely rational, without any reference to the revelation, while theism is linked to the belief in a living god whose attributes can be determined according to the analogy with nature
… come on, Bonifacio,
the next time you send us a definition comes directly from the texts of the Masonic Grand Lodge of the Grand Orient of Italy.
But please!
What helps it, look for the quirky point of honor for the irrepressible joy of lite?
Oronzo oronzini be you and all your children.
Having said this, I do not care deism and theism could care if it concerned the tea.
If you then want to know why theology is first, I would recommend you carefully study the birth of modern science.
About you, the great and famous mathematician and logician Bertrand Russell spoke of a “huge teapot that circled the world”. If you want to, He can go and read what the Russell argued in this regard.
God instead, unlike Russell's teapot, changes your life: if you do not know him, I can only feel sorry for you.
Mr. Domenico, Forgive the question, but cites Russell believes that because orenzo has the burden of proof in one of his statements or because “lol, atheism”? I confess that I would be very puzzled if that is the case.
The narcissist and “stormy” Ariel, by smell superfine, always think to write extraordinary items; Night dreams of being the “Grand Inquisitor” Dostoevsky that the poor Christ who, returning to Earth, It proffers no verb, dice:” Why have you come to disturb us?”.
You have some concrete theological argument to affirm what you write or is it just your personal opinion?
Do you remember the words nothing: “If I said something wrong, witness of the evil that I said; but if I have spoken well, why do you strike me?”
You could also make me a literary review:
Andrea Gallo
Luigi Ciotti
Vitaliano Della Sala
Alberto Maggi
etc … etc …
Given his literary vein, also face an inscription on the late Father David Maria Turoldo, who he signed for years articles on the front page of The Manifesto Communist.
Maybe then you will understand, Who were the real and dangerous interrogators that night dreamed of Marx and Engel and then poisoned by day God's people shooting dangerous crap like crazy ….
He wants a dispassionate advice to stay in this world down-to-earth, without firing ca…..te of communism and anti-communism? Leave for a little study of theology, geta few books astrophysics (knowledge of current space conquests open mind) and Molecular Biology (DNA study , RNA, protein, etc. ..). I am convinced that these “knowledge” improve your over-fundamentalist attitude. She, who possesses intelligence, so she needs to deepen Science: The only way you will open new and profitable Horizons.
… I repeat, I am a minister bosomes and not a seminaretto fearful of the multinational heretical seminars mother of The Redeemer, therefore, advice and above all orders on how to live and impress the priesthood, I take them only by ecclesiastical authority, not with surreal products of two ridiculous apprentices sorcerers Spaniards who invent roads on the border with reality.
And with that I told everything.
Write well “bullshits” in full, without ellipsis. None of these columns are shocked, especially towards those, such as walkers, of crap live there.
How can studying astrophysics and molecular biology if there were no laws of nature?
And as you can scrutinize the laws of nature without posing the question of who established these laws?
So, finally, how I can address the problem of who determined that all that exists is what it is without Theology?
Article extraordinary, father ariel. Thank you
Euthanasia is passed, the reigning pontiff is silent, all over “normal”.
I will return to rilegggere quietly. Meanwhile, it notes: as in periods of violence, under the mantle of popular justice they covered private heinous crimes, Now who will escape under the cover of intolerable suffering the legalized murder of inconvenient relative, father to inherit, wife sideways lover, et cetera ?
Salvini exploits the Crown ? And what about Spadaro, except that brandishing “sui social” oration of the Mass exploits the Divine Sacrifice, and I do not pay so much blasphemy puts us well falsification of the text, proclaiming that his prayer is forged and blasphemous Lex Orandi, then adding the license heresy .
I remember, father ariel, she said he had proposed to the episcopate a valid priest, and that his bishop replied: “Never, because it is rigid and plaster”. I took her for a freak, Instead he had figured out how to authoritatively endorsed El Papa. What then does not mind that “stiff” It is an adjective, and railed against the use of adjectives.
Excuse me, sai, but perhaps that comment was ironic…
Good morning Father Ariel, hoping not to look like a troublemaker I would like to take advantage of its availability (and possibly that of other priests in the comments intervegono) for groped to find an answer to a question that haunts me for some time.
It gave, besides Almighty is omniscient. He already knew that our two ancestors have misused, rather badly, their freedom and that their rebellion would have condemned not only their, but billions of their descendants to experience the pain and death. It seems to me that the whole creation is one, gigantic failure. Why is light given to the world and to mankind knowing what the state would be reduced? Thanks in advance for the time you will want and will dedicate myself.
There is a Gospel passage from which you could more or less indirectly understand much:
"But of that day and that hour, But, nobody knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father " [Mt 24, 36].
No human has the ability to fully understand the mystery, then the reasons for God; those who could, He would also be a god, perhaps even more powerful Creator. And this was the first great temptation in which Adam and Eve fell invited to disobedience and rebellion: «[…] and it will be like God " [GN 3,5].
It must take into account that God created Adam and Eve, by an act of supreme love, their sin was nothing but the result of their negative response to this act of pure love.
God knew yes, what would the man of freedom and free will; yet he has not given up on creating it.
That said it should be stressed that sin does not depend in any way by God, but by man. God did not create man so that man would give birth to sin, it created a free and endowed with free, and sin is one thing the whole man.
Throughout human history, God sent his only Son to remedy the rebellion of man consumed the dawn of time.
At this point its rightful doubtful reasoning could also be applied to the mystery of redemption: to what purpose the incarnation of the Word, consustanziale the Father, who is God from God, light from light, True God from true God, begotten not made of the same substance as the Father, it was given, omnipotent and omniscient, He knew in advance the end that they would do to Jesus Christ, but above all that, after two thousand years, mankind would have been worse than two millennia ago?
The reason – as stated in his Faith and Reason Pope John Paul II referring to centuries of philosophical and theological speculation antecedents starting from the first great Fathers of the Church – It leads to the faith. Once the reason to faith, at which point you can only proceed with the faith, because man, which it is a living part of the mystery, It can perceive and understand even very partially the mystery, but he can never fully understand, Because God transcends itself all our human understanding.
The largest manufacturers of atheists were not the Enlightenment, and materialists of the Marxist, often they were just pseudo masters of decadent neo-scholastic and metaphysical adulterated, who must have and then give an answer at all costs and whatever the cost, being deprived – like all people without faith – of that sum humility that should lead us to say: before the great mystery you can give explanations, but only up to a point. Beyond certain limits, the reason finally gives way to faith, which it is not an act of fideism nor deliberate and unconscious non-reasoning, but rather the result of man's deepest freedom.
I can I explain that after the Eucharistic Prayer, under the sacred species of bread and wine, thanks to the miracle of transubstantiation, It is truly and substantially present, completely, in soul, body and divinity, Our Lord Jesus Christ.
But, If you ask me to show her in an objective and scientific way that Jesus Christ is truly present in real and substantial way, I can not do that. And with that I'll tell you more: if someone proves it to him instead, please immediately move away and do not listen to the explanations and the “irrefutable demonstrations” that offer.
Thank you for your response. Accept that he could not understand, for effort can be made, it is damn hard.
Dear Emanuele,
we have been established, by the grace of sacramental status, a service of the People of God as their guides and teachers.
Not so thank a priest who has done nothing but their duty.
“Foolish is he who hopes that our reason / can percorrer the endless street / holding a Substance in three Persons. / Are you happy, human bags, because al / that if you had possuto see everything / needful was not Mary give birth”. I write it as I remember it from the Liceo remote times, perhaps inaccurate.
But in Dante's time there were already warning signs of what she calls neo-decadent school, father ariel? Or who he was referring to the great poet Virgil's mouth? If you find the time to answer me, I would be grateful. As they are for this beautiful article and the responses of some Priests. Heartening to know that there are still so many.
Finally an answer “as a priest”, for us poor people who, not being purposes theologians, There often we debate these questions…
I believe that God knew the sin of Adam because Adam has freely chosen to sin;
if Adam had freely chosen not to sin, God would know that Adam would sin.
It might seem a silly argument, but is based on the assumption that, in God, It does not exist the passage of time and everything is an eternal present: while in our conceptual reality we can imagine a God who knows the future, we just can not imagine how the past and the future can co-exist in this.
The divine omniscience no mercy would be monstrous, but in light of Grace promise and kept in Christ, it does not nullify the free choice but exalts.
My sincere thanks to Ariel and father to all priests and consecrated persons “In the” world but not “the” World
United in prayer
It says Senator
And, in the vocabulary and spoken journalism is said “senator” but it is not correct, indeed it is seriously wrong.
There are words and titles that do not include the feminine and that are used indiscriminately for men and women.
A judge, whether man or woman, It is a judge, you can not use the term “judges” O “judge”; a judge is a judge, man or woman who is, not one “magistrate” … as there is the title of architect, female engineer / ingegneressa, pharmacist, in the economist, advocate / lawyer, nor any public or private body, including courts, uses and perished peritesse, but only experts, men or women, etc …
Proof, then we find on the official acts of the State: none of my former colleagues, the times we were, It is out of college with a scroll on which was written “female doctor”, because in the final examination he was told by the chairman of the committee “in the name of the law I declare you doctor …”, near, the degree, was written: “Doctor Maria Rossi” not doctor.
The Italian language is not an opinion, nor journalists or politicians ungrammatical, They can enter the vocabulary words that do not exist.
http://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/senatore/
Senatore s. m. (f. -Trice) [dal years. senator -oris (years. senatrix slow -fcis)
No journalists or politicians ungrammatical, but the vocabulary Treccani saying the female senator senator: then if you want to challenge even the Treccani let's say that even those of Treccani are ignorant.
http://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/petaloso_%28Neologismi%29/
Well look, its staunchest defenders of Italian would not call them…
The same specification encyclopedia on this page http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/femminile-dei-nomi-di-professione_(La-grammatica-italiana)/ that the profession of female names are something recent, (quickly) “the solutions are still open and in the choice collide different sensitivities”. What then put a “senatrix” as Latin etymology is curious (although technically correct, the women you would do well), knowing that it is a word that was never used in that language.
But maybe I'm me I'm wrong and a ignoranto.
… feel feel.
And tell me, such ecclesiastical disciplines and what canons of the Code of Canon Law would have violated, to the point of invoking my immediate silenced?
What I set out heresies?
I inform you then, closely theological rigor and canon, that the Church is not the Roman Pontiff but Christ. Concepts such as “revolution” O “new course of …” They are in themselves completely foreign not only and not so much to the lexicon, but just for the new millennium culture of the Church.
The Roman Pontiff has a role based on the mandate given by Jesus Christ to the Blessed Apostle Peter. The Church, he is not the master, quite the opposite: It is his first servant.
So can neither affect the deposit of faith, which is the supreme guardian, nor can it give birth to doctrines contrary to Divine Revelation, because the course has drawn Jesus Christ, and that's the course that we are called to follow.
If you have doubts, ask the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, though when I stated here I am strictly correct, oppure no.
Like all those who come from the ranks of the old Communist Party, orphaned after the fall of the Berlin Wall and finally returned in the Church with a spirit that is frustrated by all their communist ideological education, she mistakes the Roman Pontiff for those old cardboard idols that both were dear: Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zetung and Castro.
Believe me, I smell from a distance and, sniffing you, proof of the facts so far I've never wrong.
This priest is silenced, Once for all, because it is causing serious damage to the revolutionary new course of Francis church, contrarian in all ecumenical spirit and largemouth, so can only do damage.
You are definitely right: the Vatican should restore the work of Mastro Titta not only for this priest, but also for all those clerics who do not apply to the letter the rules of the new Mercy.
_________
N.d.R. about Mastro Titta:
https://isoladipatmos.com/stage/la-pena-di-morte-e-quel-santuomo-di-mastro-titta-er-misercordioso-boia-der-papa/
Dear Father Ariel , I am a Catholic doctor and as such I can only say to be embittered by this drift euthanasia of society '.
Be the salt of the earth, Jesus said ' . Not only now Catholics in Italy , including cardinals and popes bishops priests, no more 'salt , but rather ,I am damn than by 'fruits.
L 'conscientious objection for doctors hope is still legitimate.
On the day when it will not be 'more' a doctor must 'choose from
his faith and his career. Like today must choose between faith and career very priests. I infinitely respect you to other priests who have chosen the faith at the expense of career
Dr. Maria Cristina Venturi
Really congratulations
To truly Catholic priests who have written above, to them too, I say THANK YOU Heart. Your testimony has already martyrdom, because you suffer and suffer worldly consequences of your actions, persecuted by bishops (tiny desired) clearly and deliberately wrong, astray by the devil himself. Not so in the sky: your every word, every action of witness to the Truth is grateful to the Lord. Satan now laughs, but God will have the last word. I pray for you, per me, for the whole Church. We have entered the era of evidence.
Certain characters you, father ariel, rightly call a spade … “satanic”, “Lucifer's children” etc … are de rigueur by their very nature terribly provocative.
Although the sacraments can not interessar their less, But, for ideological provocation and to bend to their whims Church, now we have to deal with the pairs gays and lesbians that they will bring the child to baptize.
Or perhaps I can, Two gay men and two lesbians, ideologists of gender and so on, ask for the fulfillment of our baptismal promises, asking them to renounce Satan … in all his works … in all its seductions …? When Satan himself are themselves ready to desecrate a sacrament, even to speak: “there, this time we had won!” ?
Now, although the sacraments can not interessar their less, by pure ideological provocation call us priests to give the anointing of the sick and the sacraments before assisted suicide, asking after the funeral obsequies …
We'll see … we'll see … What s'inventeranno jumpers from a cart to another, as rightly you call them, we'll see …
One thing is certain: I baby toy, or the child tantrum, two gays or two lesbians me presentassero, not baptize. If they want to do baptize, they bring the aloof side and I do present a godfather and a godmother who are Catholic and authentically believers.
Sacraments to those who choose assisted suicide, I not will administer them, because it would be like to carry those who are preparing to make a much greater sin than those committed in his life.
In such eventuality, if the bishop protested, I would tell him to baptize him with great pomp (why then practice also want the pomp) the son of two lesbians and two gay, and then I tell him to go there, to comfort the sacraments, before his suicide, one that is going to have his life.
If not, the parish keys, I not even return it to the Bishop, I am sending you directly to the Vatican to the Casa Santa Marta !
Dear Don Angelo,
I would not just put the knife, which is not only your, but of all of us, or at least we priests still believers but … If you want to check how certain baptisms “ideological” They have already taken place in “great pomp”, you can verify it in the deep joy of this famous gay site announcing the baptism of a child of two lesbians in the Cathedral of Cordoba in Argentina
https://www.queerblog.it/post/129783/in-argentina-il-primo-battesimo-per-la-figlia-di-una-coppia-lesbica
while in this other, You can read the record of the fact, including exceptional godmother at the baptism of the child of two lesbians: the President of the Argentine Republic
https://www.huffingtonpost.it/2014/04/02/battesimo-figlia-lesbiche-argentina-papa-francesco_n_5074567.html
Already we … we have already.
So, we must do is prepare the keys of the parishes to be returned as of now.
… here we are, here we are!
Premise: every time I made comments I always signed them, I do not now, to avoid involvement of third parties that you should avoid, In fact, what matters is only the fact.
Two newlyweds as they had their wedding witnessed a gay couple, Italians, civilly united in marriage in Spain.
I categorically refused.
They go by the bishop, Bishop calls me, and I refuse categorically even with the bishop.
The wedding day, it was agreed that I would have a sudden engagement, I left as pastor delegation to the secretary of the Bishop, who welcomed him consent, with the gay couple who were held tenderly little hand little hand in front of people throughout the liturgical celebration.
But if there is joy, there is always love.
Pity: It would be nice to also use, between the readings of the rite, a letter to “Romans 1. 18-32” and comment.
It would be a marriage of which he would feel certainly talk.
Dear Orenzo,
very bright idea, also appropriate, however risky these days. We run the risk that a rigged carnival Drag Queen Race army went to clatter on high heels in the Vatican “the insult homophobe” dell'omofobo author of the Letter to the Romans.
So we priests, the Lectionary for the liturgy of the word, we would have ended with that reading made to disappear out of the blue in the new reprints.
_____________
N.d.R.
insert text to what Orenzo is Don Ciro refer:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romani+1%3A18-32&version=LND
Indeed it would have been a bit’ forced and, in a marriage, somewhat off topic: But if it had been used that passage of Genesis where we read that “God created man in his image; in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
God blessed them and said to them,: «Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth;”,
He could have been said clearly in the face to the gay couple that marriage is only between man and woman.
Brother Piedmontese priest,
congratulations! You have done very well, God will make you well about.
Tremble and fear, a 74 year old, pastor of 3 parishes (a medium-sized and two small), have to say one day a dry “no!” to the bishop.
Disobedience to the one who gave you the mandate to exercise the priestly ministry, exercised in communion with the Bishop of the fullness of the priesthood, It is the worst of failures of an entire priestly life. What this, a priest from Palermo, then excommunicated, It did not really including, and today sowing poisons among the faithful-too poor to the already running wild in themselves.
But, if a bishop tries so ambiguous and creeping to pass, and to impose a smile, things objectively contrary to the Gospel and to Catholic morality, say unfortunately no, by the priest, It is a must, and in that case, the colossal failure, it is not the priest priesthood, but all that the fullness of the priesthood of the bishop, that faith must cherish and preserve, not scempiare.
And today we are unfortunately the massacre, there is little to say: to the havoc.
Nice article. Thank you Father Ariel, God bless her!
“… a rule that punishes assisted suicide but that does not take into account the situation of those suffering from unsustainable ...”
it is as a rule were to consider sin as adultery, but that did not take account of those suffering so unbearable for the double bond.
If John the Baptist had been against Herod's mercy taught in the AL, and had not had a behavior in line with strict rules also preach intolerance by Jesus, he would certainly lose his foreman.
To be against the aid to assisted suicide to be against the teachings of the New Church.
Thanks father Ariel. A prayer and a constant thought for her and for all the holy priests who remained Orthodox. She writes: “I am aware that we priests and theologians […] we turn to a secularized and de-Christianized world that does not understand neither the language nor our feelings and evangelical foundations that animate”. Not all, dear Father Ariel, not everybody.
Thanks as always for your words, that awaken our sleeping consciences.
Big Father Ariel!
Dear Father Ariel,
I am a Catholic doctor and as such I can only say to be embittered by this drift euthanasia society.
Be the salt of the earth Jesus said. Not only now Catholics in Italy, including cardinals and popes bishops priests, They are no longer the salt, but rather, I am damn than by 'fruits.
Conscientious objection for doctors hope is still legitimate.
On the day when it will no longer be a doctor she must choose between her faith and her career. Like today must choose between faith and career very priests.
I infinitely respect you to other priests who have chosen the faith at the expense of career.
Dr. Maria Cristina Venturi