For the Fathers of The Island of Patmos have chosen not to speak of the Synod Panamazzonico? Because we are not reporters in a scoop, between the intentions processes, collective schizophrenia and Catholics quarrelsome disarray
Latest posts by Drafting (see all)
- Who is Marco Felipe Perfetti referring to when he states from the Silere Non Possum website «here in the Vatican … us in the Vatican", if he can't even set foot in the Vatican? - 8 December 2023
- The Archabbot emeritus of Montecassino Pietro Vittorelli has died: pity can erase the sad truth? - 14 October 2023
- “miss Universe”. The island of Patmos deals with beauty because it is a manifest expression of God and his gifts in human history - 10 July 2023
Regardless of the Synod Synod is no dispute there is the obliteration of this tragic:
The self-knowledge that the soul possesses is the very level of his knowledge of his world. Since the Word of God takes the form of the signs scattered around the world, as well as the Texts Revealed, the soul "law" itself and the world according to their progress in the awareness stage. This means that the depth of meaning that can be discerned from the exegesis of the Qur'an must be the same spiritual hermeneutics that the soul is able to perform on itself and on the kingdom of Nature. Recall meditation Corbin. He said that it is possible to "read truth in what lies ahead" in their own eyes. When we read nature in this sense we perceive it as a person, an angel.
Taking as inspiration the surgery on “priests dress”, here is a nice article on the sacrament of Orders
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaticans-former-doctrine-head-ban-on-female-deacons-priests-an-infallible-catholic-dogma
which states that “the final decision of Pope John Paul II, namely "the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful"(YOU 4), It is a dogma of the Catholic faith.
And, we talked about it several times and repeatedly in the past in several of our theological articles.
https://youtu.be/d6uWa27Z2Mg
I find it commendable that we proceed with caution and not too hard in part to the widespread chatter. However the motives of perplexity exposed, the authority and seriousness of many of those who formulated them, together with the confirmed directorial style event, which follows the well-calculated to proceed and extremely determined previous occasions, unfortunately leave little to be auspicious expectations space. We hope to be proven wrong by events and by the intervention of the Holy Spirit on his Church, not so strange it seems to me that you get up, together with the prayers of many, the voice of someone less theologically versed, still mindful of what are the fundamental contents of faith in Christ, which today appear in progressive sellout.
With estimates.
this winter photograph of the island of Patmos Fathers known astonishment that … the Dominican as the Dominican habit, cappuccino the Franciscan habit, Father Ariel has the talare, the mantle and the saturn in hand.
Sorry, but you are three authentic outlaws !!!
And if anyone, This new course new church, you say something, you as you respond?
… if anyone dared to take to the Dominican her dress, Cappuccino her habit, the priest his cassock, it is very likely that all three give a mandate to Alberto Sordi to meet him and sing it in person on behalf of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos :
dear father Ariel
I ask those who are fomenting confusion?
E’ normal that in a preparation document to a synod there are inside heresies?
E’ normal a pope who sing praise to a immigrazionista ideology complete with a monument ?https://www.vaticannews.va/it/papa/news/2019-09/papa-francesco-statua-migrante-piazza-san-pietro.html ,who signs a fraternity document with Islam denies the Holy Trinity? Or that Christians, Islamic, Jews and Buddhists are children of the same God? Or that the plurality of religions has been willed by God? Before Vatican II, the Church considered them other religions false true?
Thank you
dear fabio,
the ancient Romans would have said: does not belong to the thing [the thing / issue is not relevant, implied: the issue].
It would be as if she he went to a gynecologist for sollevargli whole range of issues on the prostate, He understands well that these will invite to go urologist, or at least he will tell you that she raises him irrelevant questions.
When you enter into the merits of the comments of an article, We have to stick to what the item is and says, not what you do not say.
In which part of the article of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos, They contain the issues concerning all the questions she addresses? In short: in comments to an article, she asks us answers to questions that the article did not deal.
Instead, with extreme clarity, We explained that the only objective fact that we now have, it's a tool of labor containing worrisome errors. More authoritatively of us have also said the bishops and cardinals, raising concerns that our concerns are the same.
Having clarified this, we explained, to purely logical rigor, that until, after the Synod, not a document will be released, no one can be able to say anything, otherwise they would do some real processes intentions, because any intentions are to achieve all ancòra, always assuming that you realize.
If the post-synodal apostolic document enshrines something wrong in conflict with the deposit of faith, we will act as we have explained: by adhering to the teaching of the Blessed Apostle Paul, we reported at the end of our explanations.
The duty of Catholics is to pray daily for the Pope: It may perhaps be Catholic if not “how Petro is under Petro”?
What then Peter pull out the sword to cut off the ear of Malchus, or deny Christ or catechizzi the people out of the Cenacle, those are issues that Peter will have to clarify with those who ruled Stone.