For the Fathers of The Island of Patmos have chosen not to speak of the Synod Panamazzonico? Because we are not reporters in a scoop, between the intentions processes, collective schizophrenia and Catholics quarrelsome disarray

- Church news -

WHY THE FATHERS DE L'ISLE OF PATMOS HAVE CHOSEN NOT TO MENTION THE SYNOD PANAMAZZONICO? WHY DO NOT WE JOURNALISTS A SCOOP OF HUNTING, PROCESS BETWEEN THE INTENTIONS, COLLECTIVE SCHIZOPHRENIA AND CATHOLICS IN QUESTION disarray

[…] said the early seventies of the twentieth century, the Servant of God Enrico Medi: "Of the modern world does not scare me atomic weapons, pollution or wars; what scares me is the collective madness towards which the world is falling ".

.

Author
The Fathers of The Island of Patmos

.

.

PDF format Print article

 

.

.

Rome, January 2019: Fathers de The island of Patmos

Contemporary society, but also the Church itself, that the company is a living part, now it seems pervaded by a very dangerous virus: assume that you know that ...

.

With no little anxiety we read, After that they were sent by Readers, blog pages and various magazines for weeks throwing fire bombs on the Synod Panamazzonico. What's unique and that these characters - mostly anonymous faceless, nameless - who pose as saviors of true and authentic doctrine, as authentic keyboard lions without identity registry shot and they continue to fire bursts that every good player should judge least worrisome. It is in fact an attitude that does not fall in war schemes of "preventive war", but the actual process of intentions.

.

For now what we have in hand, Panamazzonico Synod of everything to celebrate, then to decide and to define? We only have one work tool which rightly he disturbed a great Church historian and ecclesiologist of the stature of Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, the track to illustrate in an entirely legitimate and just opened it, along with other prominent figures and theologians who followed him, the extent to which this text was written badly and harbinger of ambiguity. For now we can only be said to be very concerned that it was approved a preparatory document that contains errors and ambiguities. We can then express that if certain theses from the working tool would pass, and might go to construction, we could not even speak of heresy, but the real apostasy from the faith, as explained by Cardinal Walter Brandmüller [cf. see article, WHO]. Also worth mentioning that these our columns, we were the first ever - without thereby wanting to give Firsts “honor” —, to write that what was actually a panamazzonico synod pantedesco [cf. see article, WHO], If numbers and dates are not a vague opinion. All the more reason we was pleased when a few weeks later, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, He stated that the preparation of this synod hovered a strong German influence. They then followed the bishops and priests from around the world, theologians and lay faithful, Catholic opinion makers and journalists who experienced all of their more than legitimate concerns, founded and motivated.

.

The army the quarrelsome lovers, that without the litigation they may lose all reason for existence of their weak faith and poor, however, miss the fact that the elderly, skilful and polished Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, as those who have followed him, speak hypothetically, on the sole objective fact that we have at the moment, ie the preparatory document, say work tool. A poorly written text and containing obvious doctrinal errors. To follow these days with another member of the College of Cardinals who has also lifted its reservation, this time it is a prefect in charge, Cardinal Marc Ouellet Armand it, who presides over the ministry of the bishops and of which refers in these hours the vaticanista Sandro Magister with its own service [cf. see article, WHO].

.

Day by day Unfortunately we find ourselves in front of people who may vary by journalists to the various telematic magazines, to follow with a jungle of mostly anonymous blog, who they have already given feedback and severe decided on a Synod that has not opened yet.

.

If the Synod was planning and propose anything that would go against the doctrine and the perennial teaching of the Church, even before what one might like to scream that much. Nothing in fact become new doctrine or new ecclesiastical discipline until the Roman Pontiff, which is responsible for drawing up the final document, He will not have accepted in whole or in part the instances of the Synod Fathers issuing a his post-synodal apostolic exhortation. Just before this document, ie before the data truly objective, It will be possible to take note and then express themselves, or if also express reservations, even if there were only a passage that ambiguously would create conflict with the Deposit of Faith.

.

Before the People of God, we have responsibilities now perhaps more demanding than ever. For the sacrament of grace devolves to us to teach, sanctify and lead or govern Christi fideles. In particular schizophrenic when certain members of the People of God would claim their, to teach their bishops and priests, to dictate their own rules on how to sanctify, but above all to drive them, according to their humoral whims and irrational, the bishops and priests.

.

Those of us who are burdened by these responsibilities, in a Church in which the laity often seems almost crazy in a reversal of roles that should really worry, we can not and should not put us to do or preventive wars or processes the intentions of something that must be realized. With this it is said that, are the final document of the Synod He came out out even a single element expressed explicitly or hidden between words ambiguously, going to contradict the deposit of faith and Catholic doctrine, at that point we would be required in science and Catholic conscience to apply the words of the Blessed Apostle Paul and then to act accordingly ...

.

"I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ turning to a different gospel. Indeed, but, there is not another; just that there are some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. It, But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel other than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed! We have already said and now repeat: if any man preach a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be accursed! Indeed, It is perhaps the favor of men that I intend to earn, or rather that of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still pleasing men, do not be a servant of Christ!» [Maybe 1, 5-10].

.

... but only after you can do so, following in the footsteps of the Apostle Paul Blessed and only in the cases indicated by him, not before, because neither the doctrine nor the Catholic morality make or encourage in any way the process of intentions, even when intentions are not good and are revealed to this potentially very dangerous.

.

That's why the Fathers de The island of Patmos can not and should not talk about what still has to be realized - always assuming that to happen - because we feel all our deepest responsibility to the people of God, in this ecclesial society and increasingly confused ecclesiastical, humoral and schizophrenic. Or as said in the early seventies of the twentieth century, the Servant of God Enrico Medi:

.

"Of the modern world does not scare me atomic weapons, pollution or wars; what scares me is the collective madness towards which the world is falling " [from a conference in October 1974 Catholic University of Milan].

.

the Island of Patmos, 2 October 2019

.

.

It is for sale our new book, you can view it at the store library WHO

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:









or you can use the bank account:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanksgiving [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]





Avatar

About isoladipatmos

11 thoughts on "For the Fathers of The Island of Patmos have chosen not to speak of the Synod Panamazzonico? Because we are not reporters in a scoop, between the intentions processes, collective schizophrenia and Catholics quarrelsome disarray

  1. The duty of Catholics is to pray daily for the Pope: It may perhaps be Catholic if not “cum Petro e sub Petro”?
    What then Peter pull out the sword to cut off the ear of Malchus, or deny Christ or catechizzi the people out of the Cenacle, those are issues that Peter will have to clarify with those who ruled Stone.

  2. dear father Ariel

    I ask those who are fomenting confusion?
    And’ normal that in a preparation document to a synod there are inside heresies?
    And’ normal a pope who sing praise to a immigrazionista ideology complete with a monument ?https://www.vaticannews.va/it/papa/news/2019-09/papa-francesco-statua-migrante-piazza-san-pietro.html ,who signs a fraternity document with Islam denies the Holy Trinity? Or that Christians, Islamic, Jews and Buddhists are children of the same God? Or that the plurality of religions has been willed by God? Before Vatican II, the Church considered them other religions false true?

    Thank you

    1. Dear Fabio,

      the ancient Romans would have said: does not belong to the thing [the thing / issue is not relevant, understood: the issue].
      It would be as if she he went to a gynecologist for sollevargli whole range of issues on the prostate, He understands well that these will invite to go urologist, or at least he will tell you that she raises him irrelevant questions.

      When you enter into the merits of the comments of an article, We have to stick to what the item is and says, not what you do not say.
      In which part of the article of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos, They contain the issues concerning all the questions she addresses? In conclusion: in comments to an article, she asks us answers to questions that the article did not deal.

      Instead, with extreme clarity, We explained that the only objective fact that we now have, it's a work tool containing worrisome errors. More authoritatively of us have also said the bishops and cardinals, raising concerns that our concerns are the same.

      Having clarified this, we explained, to purely logical rigor, that until, after the Synod, not a document will be released, no one can be able to say anything, otherwise they would do some real processes intentions, because any intentions are to achieve all ancòra, always assuming that you realize.

      If the post-synodal apostolic document enshrines something wrong in conflict with the deposit of faith, we will act as we have explained: by adhering to the teaching of the Blessed Apostle Paul, we reported at the end of our explanations.

  3. this winter photograph of the island of Patmos Fathers known astonishment that … the Dominican as the Dominican habit, cappuccino the Franciscan habit, Father Ariel has the talare, the mantle and the saturn in hand.
    Sorry, but you are three authentic outlaws !!!
    And if anyone, This new course new church, you say something, you as you respond?

    1. … if anyone dared to take to the Dominican her dress, Cappuccino her habit, the priest his cassock, it is very likely that all three give a mandate to Alberto Sordi to meet him and sing it in person on behalf of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos :


  4. I find it commendable that we proceed with caution and not too hard in part to the widespread chatter. However the motives of perplexity exposed, the authority and seriousness of many of those who formulated them, together with the confirmed directorial style event, which follows the well-calculated to proceed and extremely determined previous occasions, unfortunately leave little to be auspicious expectations space. We hope to be proven wrong by events and by the intervention of the Holy Spirit on his Church, not so strange it seems to me that you get up, together with the prayers of many, the voice of someone less theologically versed, still mindful of what are the fundamental contents of faith in Christ, which today appear in progressive sellout.
    With estimates.

  5. Taking as inspiration the surgery on “priests dress”, here is a nice article on the sacrament of Orders
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaticans-former-doctrine-head-ban-on-female-deacons-priests-an-infallible-catholic-dogma
    which states that “the final decision of Pope John Paul II, namely "the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful"(THE 4), It is a dogma of the Catholic faith.

    1. Yes, we talked about it several times and repeatedly in the past in several of our theological articles.

  6. Regardless of the Synod Synod is no dispute there is the obliteration of this tragic:
    The self-knowledge that the soul possesses is the very level of his knowledge of his world. Since the Word of God takes the form of the signs scattered around the world, as well as the Texts Revealed, the soul "law" itself and the world according to their progress in the awareness stage. This means that the depth of meaning that can be discerned from the exegesis of the Qur'an must be the same spiritual hermeneutics that the soul is able to perform on itself and on the kingdom of Nature. Recall meditation Corbin. He said that it is possible to "read truth in what lies ahead" in their own eyes. When we read nature in this sense we perceive it as a person, an angel.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters remaining

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.