NUNZIO GALANTINO IS A PARADIGM OF THE EPISCOPATE ON THE DECK OF THE TITANIC STRUCK BY’ICEBERG
Lead characters such as Nunzio Galantino to the episcopate, entrust their particular churches and then name them in such delicate roles at the top of the Italian Episcopal Conference, is equivalent to continue undeterred to dance to the music of the Orchestra in the ballroom of the Titanic that is drowning after striking theiceberg.
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo
The lack of prudence manifested on several occasions by the Secretary-General of the Italian Bishops ' Conference and. Mons. Nunzio Galantino leads to that lack of touch typical of persons instead of practicing the roads of the social doctrine of the Church — that part in 1891 the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiff Leo XIII through the Encyclical Rerum Novarum [cf. WHO] and culminates in 1991 with the Centesimus annus [cf. WHO] of the Holy Father John Paul II ― can lead on the way to those teologismi from which it finally collapses in the smoke of political sociologismi, stimmatizzati repeatedly with theological rigor among the columns of our Telematics Journal.
An erroneous theological thought that of Bishop G, in which Christ – in fact – is not start, the Center and the top end of our entire eschatological humanism [cf. Dominus Jesus, WHO], but an accessory; of undoubted importance, vital, but some accessory. And on the latter's theme Christ accessory will publish soon a special and specific theological analysis.
InPatmos Island you do theology and at the right time is our imperative of conscience say objectively what is Orthodox and what is objectively unorthodox in the light of revealed truth of the Incarnate Word and the Church's Magisterium. Even before the most stubborn error we ever hit people who should always be our respect, starting first Ecclesistiche authorities. Hit though misconceptions, and in particular those carried out so very dangerous by certain Church authorities, It is a duty to which we cannot and must not shirk, why defend truth from error is the Foundation of Christian charity, based on truth, not on doing good aerostato. Our pastoral and theological task is then explain and disseminate the revealed truth of the Incarnate Word and the Magisterium of the Church. For the rest there is a wide range of Catholic journals who rejoice in shooting the ladle in the cauldron of politics; which was completely legitimate, because Catholics are an integral part of life in this country, In addition to its citizens with voting rights, as I recently pointed out by analyzing the inappropriate television appearances of s. and. Mons. Domenico Sigallini, Bishop of the suburbicarian Diocese of Palestrina [cf. WHO].
No "G" of the modern ― or rather wire-modernist "grew up in the 1970s to the cry of" more collegiality, more dialogue, more democracy in the Church ", can therefore inhibit priests and theologians in the exercise of the freedom of God's children and the subsequent exercise of critical sense in the context of theological speculation. Exactly what the code of Canon law allows always to Ministers in sacris and the living members of the people of God. Canon 212 question indeed, one part, faithful obedience to pastors, other, recognizes their right to express reservations on what concerns the good of the Church ". Based in monte on a fact documented: the Apostle Paul at Antioch moves of severe criticism to the Apostle Peter about pastoral matters [Maybe 2,11]. Today, unfortunately,, in the modern Antakya, Peter errors could be even more serious as proportionate to very sad times and a Western society to complete collapse, but unfortunately it seems that there is not even a shadow of a Paul in whole Apostolic College.
Ignore these assumptions may result in the fall in two different errors: idolatry revolt with pandering to powerful spirit supine on the crest of a wave; the rebellion to the authority of the Church of Christ on the other side. In one and in the other case, at the base of it all is the immaturity of the faith, but above all trying to remove speculative minds the freedom of God's children, in the name of the post-Conciliar spot: «More collegiality, more dialogue, more democracy in the Church ", which ended up bringing to power the worst dictators, exactly who in the late 1960s and 1970s the concept of the authority have destroyed. As always though dictators known do not admit never sane discussions, Why don't you compare and do not accept the public debate, they are self-referential and destructive to any opinion other than their; and from the ashes of the authorities themselves had destroyed their own authoritarianism based on their wild and Moody will.
The criticism, with the most devoted garbo case can be addressed lawfully even to the Roman Pontiff, When he does not express itself in matters of doctrine as one who, «again», is called to the divine mandate to "strengthen his brethren in faith» [cf. LC 22, 31-34]. Let alone for this if it is not permissible to turn critical to nebulous political sociologismi theological and pastoral pseudo pseudo Bishop Nunzio Galantino.
If for some, to Galantino It is a political problem, for us, therefore, is a theological problem connected to a drama that is the Church vituperando: the wrong people made do damage in the most delicate. Undoubtedly we are the first to recognize that never before has the relationship between the Government of the Italian Republic and the Holy See had been so strained, with considerable bits of embarrassment on both sides, just for the shoot of the Bishop improvvide verbal Nunzio Galantino [cf. WHO]. Indeed, us cattolici italiani, We must no doubt gratitude to all successive Governments since the war onwards, including Socialist Governments and later the Governments formed by members of the post-Communist left-liberal; because everyone has always had a great eye for the Italian Catholic Church, This thing that should not be forgotten and if necessary also explained to the Secretary General of the CEI. Unless he wants to spit on the plate where the Italian episcopate “eats” roughly over 1.5 billion euros per year from the revenue of the Eight per thousand. And with this money is kept too many useless parasites with salaries from civil servants in the central offices of the CEI, most of them have as their only merit to be relatives, grandchildren or friends of friends of some monsignorotto, among other things, not always heterosexual, given the widespread omosessualismo that sometimes seems to reign in Church, with all the well known and obvious consequences. This is to say that before you point the finger on’adolescent acne the politicians should think about our ancient crusts from lepers, in this species the liturgical year in which, during the sacred liturgy, you are reading the Gospel of Matthew where Jesus thunders fiery words against the hypocrites [cf. Mt 6,1-6.16-18; Mt 7,1-28]. Now, the BAM is verbal Galantino misplaced, It is common ground, but then again: the problem for us is not theological but political, the result of a wrong and pastoral-populist demagogic. And again, that the issue is theological because from pseudo-Galantino theology understand all his improvvidi political attacks masquerading behind pastoral pretexts do not stand and that they are not standing, except in the light of the recklessness and in some respects even the subtle lack of true Christian charity, which requires above all wisdom.
To understand where the proceeds speak nebulous Galantino you have to go to the roots of his philosophical and theological formation, first place – despite the "sacred titles "achieved – philosophically speaking is almost non-existent. The second is confusing, as we will explain in detail in brief. If there were sufficient titles in perfect rule issued by ecclesiastical or civil institutions to be authentic speculative minds, of philosophers or theologians, or the natural candidates for the episcopate, in this case, the world would be so much full of doctors of the Church would have serious difficulties in placing them somehow in life and then below the roll of dead Saints.
If G is philosopher before a metaphysical philosopher, would not know even where to start the talk and perhaps seek to escape the pens touring words on ... dialectical synthesis of ideological alternation according to the paradigm of thinking platform thought so unthinkable within a nucleus para-logical and rational fiction but partly objective according to the parameters of socio-political contexts of Dietrich Bonhöffer ... because this is in fact the post sixtyeight Galantino, a sort of socio-political scientist who in the 1970s he graduated in philosophy at the University of Bari civil with a thesis on Bonhöffer anthropology as a premise to its political commitment.
From bad to worse his theological studies, through which he received all those "Most Holy cards"under which too many think that this is enough to be dogmatic theologians outside of any possible discussion. G in fact follows the license degree in dogmatic theology at one of several affected theological studies of the post-1968, that of Southern Italy, known as one of the worst of our country, Since it was sent to teach at the level of the Jesuits who were embarrassing even theological the Pontifical Gregorian University in the 1970s, which is all to say. If in fact in Rome, for the presence of the Apostolic See, There was at least a weak attempt to control of the Pontifical universities and chairs, peripheral theological studies, starting from Naples, they were instead forge and uncontrolled spread of the worst polo heretical thoughts. A bit like the Camorra, which plays and exercises its shady dealings in areas of the province of Caserta and surroundings, avoid giving too much in the eye in the central areas of Naples on which law enforcement agencies seek to exercise any control.
As thesis studio Galantino presents a perfect duplicate of his philosophical thesis: Bonhöffer between theology and political commitment. And here it would be interesting to refer to a debate with Galantino real dogmatic theologians to determine what, but above all how deep is his knowledge of the complex and intricate history of dogma, starting from the early councils of the Church, but especially when deep knowledge of those doctors of the Church which today we can speak of dogmatic theology: Sant'Anselmo d'Aosta, San Tommaso Aquino, Saint Bonaventure of Bagnoregio.
… Unless the Ecc.mo Prelate does not intend to, as another of the intellectual Magna Greece, Prof. Don Giuseppe Ruggieri, claiming that "St. Thomas Aquinas is passed», and once established this “read” principiava foolishness the cycle of lectures at the Studio Teologico San Paolo di Catania basing their theology on Hegelian parameters, in the silence of the bishops Sicilians who left him for three decades to poison their brains future priests, with all visible and undeniable disastrous consequences of this, starting from the latest distressing Episcopal levers, with the exception of the current Bishop of Trapani s. and. Mons. Pietro Maria Femi, that despite having inherited a very difficult situation see determined grace and wisdom of good Shepherd.
At last, the philosopher and theologian Nunzio Galantino, the inevitable result is that in Naples, where he received — as indeed in Rome where the doctorates are pulled behind like confetti at a Carnival, including subjects with important failures not on theology but on the Catechism of the Catholic Church "is a courtesy that as a coffee is not denied to anyone for good clerical heart. Obvious and granted the title of the thesis: The historicity as fidelity to land in Bonhöffer.
To avoid any potential misunderstanding It is not only the right thing but even necessary and valuable that theologians make studies of authors filled of the worst heresies, but in order to refute their errors. Suffice it to say my brother priest and teacher, the Dominican John Carlson, with which we send out the pastoral and theological experience of this magazine. The famous papal theologian has spent three decades of his life to the study of complex and articulated teologismi Karl Rahner, indicating the toxicity of their installation and explaining and demonstrating how and why this famous German theologian is an authentic factory of heresies. Entirely different speculative speech Galantino, who has not rebutted the doctrinal errors and heresies of Bohnöffer, He married joyfully and disseminated, and today we find ourselves as number two in charge at the Italian Bishops ' Conference.
His current view “uselessness” Maybe you could change the Palace of the former Holy Office, Today the Congregation for the doctrine of the faith, in a hostel to accommodate the poor that soon will come to Rome for the Jubilee of mercy, Since the poor are the "true faith”, are the "flesh of Christ"before which"kneel adoring”, MICA kneel before the Eucharist, God forbid! Everything else is so unnecessary surplus, Indeed it is precisely a reminiscence of Rome curiale of the past, that instead of worrying about sell showers for the homeless under Bernini's Colonnade, drew at that dicastery various theologians who were leaving for the tangent spreading non-Catholic doctrines within the Catholic Church. Therefore, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller now Prefect of the Congregation, could become the new prefect of the Congregation for Bosniak refugees, assuming that it is not supplanted by the Archbishop of Agrigento Francesco Montenegro, Cardinal of the title of San Prophet Muhammad in Lampedusa at the gates of Europe Bashed.
At this point I will just summarize only some of the various heresies which structure of the heretic Lutheran thought Dietrich Bonhöffer, indicated as such and never refuted by G in any publication and publish Conference:
1. Bonhöffer denied the divine inspiration of the Old Testament books, judging their testimonies that become the word of God at the time that she speaks to an individual; otherwise it is only the word of man .
2. Bonhöffer Denied the Biblical God because in his view the concept of God as the Supreme being, in absolute power and goodness, is a false conception of transcendence and the idea of God as a working hypothesis in the moral, politics and science should be abandoned, as far as possible or eliminated .
3. Bonhöffer questioned the virgin birth of Christ .
4. Bonhöffer supports that "Jesus Christ today is not a real person or a real being, but a corporate presence», so in fact denied the divinity of the Incarnate Word .
5. Bonhöffer says that the resurrection of Christ must be read in the context of "mythological aspects», with clear reference to the heresies of Rudolf Bultmann, then that Christianity "is to be interpreted so as not to make religion a pre-condition of faith», then he denied the physical resurrection of Christ. And always influence on Bultmann says that miracles and ascension of Christ were "mythological conceptions" .
6. Bonhöffer believes that Christ is not the only way to God, opening the doors to relativism and Syncretism and thus negating the whole mystery of revelation .
7. Bonhöffer was an evolutionist  and believed that the book of Genesis is a childish and as such full of myths  that need to be properly de-mythologized.
8. Bonhöffer joined the neo-Orthodox theology on Salvation , It was a sacramentalista , He believed that the baptism of infants to regenerate , like that of adults , equiparò membership in the Church for salvation  and denied the idea of a personal/individual salvation .
Today we have bishops and Cardinals formed with poisonous ideas of Rahner, Schillebeeckx's, Teilhard de Chardin, Cox's, by Heidegger, of Schleiermacher, of Kierkegaard, by Barth, by Bonhöffer, to Bultmann, Moltmann's, of Cullmann, by Luther, by Loisy, of Descartes, Kant's, of Hegel, Freud's, Nice …
Our bishops are charged the shortsighted lethargy of the previous generation of their brothers formed during the immediate post Council. And all of them Bishop Nunzio Galantino is paradigm and as such was made Secretary-General of the Italian Bishops.
Not subject to denial is that Bishop Nunzio Galantino, which oozes more modernism that smiles, He trained and has developed its own "philosophical" thoughts and "theological" on theses and theories of non-Catholic authors filled of the worst heresies; and these authors are still its structural reference points, Bonhöffer in head. From this it follows a problem really dramatic for a bishop in place similar delicate role, not to serve and not to spread the real truth revealed of the Incarnate Word but to serve and to spread the likely, namely those Fables of the Holy Apostle Paul: "Day, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, but, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to look at fairy tales» [II Tm 4, 3-4].
Bring characters like G to the episcopate, entrust their particular churches and then name them in such delicate roles at the top of the Italian Episcopal Conference, equivalent in all respects to continue undeterred to dance to the music of the Orchestra in the ballroom of the Titanic that is drowning after striking theiceberg. Let me be clear: No one puts in question the authority of the Bishop Galantino Nuncio that he comes to the sacrament of grace from the fullness of the priesthood. I'd be the first to give devoted and filial obedience if disgrace was the canonical Bishop having jurisdiction over me. The problem, in my humble opinion but firm, is that as individuals should not be made Galantino bishops; but once you have become their apostolic authority is out of the question, While their authority or their lack of human authority, philosophy, theological and pastoral formation can be subject to many discussions, without taking anything away from what is due to them in respect and obedience on the part of priests and of the subjects of their particular churches. Or to put it in other words: «Obey You "— I would say to my Bishop G —" why obedience is due you and why I solemnly promise. Know, however, that does not respect you, Why won't my estimate is instead due, why I solemnly promise, why the Church has asked me and any priest of’Orbe catholica to promise solemnly bishops estimate. And I, in the exercise of the freedom of God's children, don't you think it is not worthy of my esteem».
The father John Carr and I are not even got off the Titanic, for the simple fact that there have never risen above. When the port of Liverpool heard how the man defied the creator stating "this ship is unsinkable because even God's wrath would never hit it!», We got to shout: "Do not climb above the ship, because pride leads to the inevitable ruin!». did what, we have turned away before being able to run as rescuers of victims who survived the great shipwreck that tomorrow will be allocated to the various Galantino, and all the little cicisbei in career chasing their little place in the Sun today that invite him to cut the tapes to various events around Italy, in illusory certainty of having chosen the winning horse. And while in truth they flicker on a rickety tuk tuk pulled from a Pony, kidnapped by the interests of their only live immediate that comes from not having understood what it really means to the incarnation of the word of God then what really is the Church of Christ in an eschatological perspective, I even convinced to triumph over the King's carriage pulled by twelve Arab stallions, ox people knelt in the street unable to shout that the Emperor is naked, because this is politically incorrect; such political incorrectness and would never be allowed by the new atheists ecclesiologi from the newspaper La Repubblica and by the masons to enjoy themselves more than ever to the sheepfold of God in ruins at the hands of his own Pastors who accepted the wolves among the sheep. But sooner or later a kid screams the obvious nakedness of the King and carried out the will of God who "scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts and exalted the lowly", While the heel of the Blessed Virgin Mary will crush the head of the ancient snake, and even in the whole of his brood ruffian viperelle …
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, pp. 9, 104; Sanctorum Communio, p. 161
 CF. Letters and Papers from Prison, S.C.M. Press edition, Great Britain: Fontana Books, 1953, pp. 122, 164, 360
 CF. The Cost of Discipleship, p. 215
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, pp. 75-76; Christ the Center, p. 58
 CF. Christ the Center, p. 112; Letters and Papers from Prison, S.C.M. Press edition, Great Britain: Fontana Books, 1953, pp. 93-94, 110
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, pp. 55-56
 CF. No Rusty Swords, p. 143
 CF. Creation and Fall: To Theological Interpretation of Genesis 1-3
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, p. 130
 CF. Life Together, p. 122; The Way to Freedom, pp. 115, 153
 CF. Letters and Papers from Prison, Macmillan, pp. 142-143
 CF. The Way to Freedom, p. 151
 CF. The Way to Freedom, p. 93
 CF. Letters and Papers from Prison, Macmillan, p. 156
FAITHFUL AND REALISTIC PORTRAYAL OF THE CHURCH AND OF THE ITALIAN EPISCOPATE IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015 AND ITS MANY “NUNZIO GALANTINO “