While the bishops beat up the sheep and interact with the wolf, the Holy Spirit blows in the People of God who will save the Church
Latest posts by Drafting (see all)
- Who is Marco Felipe Perfetti referring to when he states from the Silere Non Possum website «here in the Vatican … us in the Vatican", if he can't even set foot in the Vatican? - 8 December 2023
- The Archabbot emeritus of Montecassino Pietro Vittorelli has died: pity can erase the sad truth? - 14 October 2023
- “miss Universe”. The island of Patmos deals with beauty because it is a manifest expression of God and his gifts in human history - 10 July 2023
Very true and relevant, but the digression on the laity all imbeccati by obscure complottardi chasing porpore I know very convoluted. Some figure like that exist as well, and you have a lot more information about me that I do not, but a layman who loves the Church, to realize and deprecate certain distortions, just catechism.
Ardiamo from receiving light from the Pope, and yet it seems to grope in a dense smoke that is not cigarettes (ask the Blessed Paul VI). E’ El true that the Pope's words, in majority, They can be interpreted in a Catholic, but the face of such difficult chance, it would be quite desirable it reunites Pope be silent ? There is already clear the perennial teaching of the Church, because they dilute and obscure, under the spotlight and the applause of “false friends” ?
here is where the people blowing the Spirit of…WHO: http://blog.messainlatino.it/2017/10/scandaloso-video-dei-giovani-portati.html#more
dear fabio,
I share the inappropriateness of what happened, but it must at the same time say that prayer is not and can not be a tool of protest. As the liturgy can not be a pretext for other purposes, and in this regard is sufficient to remember how many times, certi preti, in electoral environment, They have changed the pulpits in political forums.
It's true, Don Ariel, Prayer can not be a tool of protest. But apparently this was not the intention. Interviewed by ChurchMilitant, one of the participants said that it was the spirit of testimony and repair the outrage was being done:
We didn’t do it in a spirit of polemics towards faithful priests, just in a spirit of reparation and resistance against profanation and celebration of a revolt against the Holy Catholic Church.
Obviously, the limit of these spontaneous initiatives, born without a particular coordination, It is that everyone can go with their intentions… and it is said that they are always the right ones. Even the great Polish Rosary can be interpreted in different ways. But when the hierarchical Church is in disarray, This phenomenon seems to me inevitable.
very expensive, I considered that an authentic witness of the Catholic faith … mariana, not a protest.
In times of confusion and religious promiscuity, the Ave Marie cattolicissime can only be good.
reverend, I am increasingly perplexed:
http://www.nev.it/nev/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/171031_DichiarazioneCongiuntaCEIELKI_2017.pdf
What do you think?
Dear Orenzo,
Father Giovanni Cavalcoli has already covered the topic in this article [WHO]
Strange: the statement that I linked is dated 31.10.2017 (today) while the comment P. Cavalcoli says the declaration last year.
I refer in particular to the words:
“Catholics and Lutherans believe that these paths should be supported and encouraged in order to stimulate a RETHINK OF CATECHESIS IN KEY ECUMENICAL, ESPECIALLY IN CONNECTION WITH THE CELEBRATION OF THE BAPTISM OF MARRIAGE and, more generally, the ecumenical liturgies of reconciliation, so help you live these moments in the life of local communities as an opportunity… able to help a better understanding of their own identity, making it more vibrant and meaningful mission of the Church.”
But if for Lutherans
– Baptism does not erase the original sin but simply covers it so that sin remains invincible lust
– and marriage is not a sacrament but it is something profane and can be dissolved,
– Ecumenical catechesis which is invoked by today's document concerning baptism and marriage?
… always hoping that with “ecumenical liturgies of reconciliation” not alluding to the Eucharist in common…
Meanwhile the Vatican press office issued a press, or not signed by Bishop Ambrogio Spreafico or by Pastor Heiner Bludau,
http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2017/10/31/0753/01633.html#it
in which you can do the nod to “rethinking of catechesis… Baptism and Marriage”: What is succedendoi Vatican?
Dear don Ariel, Attention: the dictator you indicated with reference to Wikipedia is one of Equatorial Guinea, not the infamous Sekou Touré of Guinea, pure and simple.
Kind regards
Dear Iginio,
le sono molto grato.
The link was made by the editors and I was not aware that it was not Sekou Toure, because I had not opened.
I try to correct it.
Bergoglio is not there by accident. Decisions are made with his signature with his approval. But it is not one who thinks differently from modernist Bishops Conferences. Of course, not being homosexual, probably he does not have great pleasure in naming bishops or to accept their power. On this point I can figure out who has their hands tied. It did not happen only to him. But on the doctrine and pastoral it is not less than other Modernist. To Buenos Aires, according to several witnesses-I think I have also written a book- allow communion to divorced and cohabiting to all cohabitants. AL has written him. The statements of Luther has made him. The statements of Hell and Purgatory were pronounced him at the hearing on Wednesday. I understand this is difficult to dissolve the Jesuits or scomunicarne the top for incredible claims of hell and the Gospels: but a strong intervention it could do. If it does not, and why, at the bottom of, except perhaps a few details, think like p.Sosa.
http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/it/homilies/2017/documents/papa-francesco_20171015_omelia-ritodicanonizzazione.html
but when, in commenting on the passage of Mt 22,1-14, listening to a sermon in which, after specifying that
“… Many guests have said no, because they were taken from their interests: 'They paid no attention and went off to his field, another to his business "… they did not think that the wedding were sad or boring, but simply "they paid no attention": They were diverted from their interests, They preferred to have something rather than get involved, like love requires. Here's how you keep their distance love, not out of malice, but because they prefer their own: le sicurezze, self-affirmation, comforts…”,
states that God
“… in front of the continuous waste that receives, before the closures towards his invitations, Go on, do not see the party. Not resigned, but continues to invite. Faced with the "no", not slamming the door, but still it includes more. It gave, in the face of injustice, He responds with a greater love… while he is suffering for our "no", continues however to revive, It goes on to prepare well for the evil-doer. Because so is the love, He makes love; because the only way to overcome evil…”,
I can not but be perplexed.