Me compels obedience to the truth: "The petition in favor of Amoris laetitia is much worse than the correctio filialis that the Pope of heresy accusation". And in the appendix: a small prophecy in death of Benedict XVI 19 October 201723 October 2017 isoladipatmos ME REQUIRES THE TREAT THE TRUTH: "THE PETITION IN FAVOR OF The joy IS VERY WORST CORRECTION filiales PROSECUTION OF HERESY THAT THE POPE ". AND APPENDIX: A SMALL PROPHECY IN DEATH OF BENEDICT XVI . Day after day, the Pope Francis I is showing a parent all’apice of irresponsibility, but not for that never cease to be, For better or for worse, our rightful parent. Therefore, son grieved, It can also tell: "I wish we had a different parent ', but always animated by the full knowledge that his parent is. And as such it must also accept it and respect it, up to accept, with great suffering, the fact that, and for training the parent, it has never been the task of the children, while helping the parent, this is a real duty of children. . . AuthorAriel S. Levi Gualdo . . PDF format Print article . . "In the Church you are now visible you priests survivors of a militant Church and salvation that no longer exists, why can you call the paleo-presbìteri, congiungervi waiting for the triumphant Church in the heavenly Jerusalem " Jorge Facio Lince, private Talks con Ariel S. Levi Gualdo . . . new cover for the next edition of Les Miserables, Victor Hugo. In the picture: His Holiness Francis I interviewed the Paduan priest Marco Pozza, worthy son of … Friar Cipolla [cf. article WHO] The ambiguity of the Holy Father, his refusal to respond and clarify, perhaps due to a cage in which it was closed or in which unwittingly allowed herself to close [cf. response to a reader, WHO], equivalent to a plane without a parachute launch. And before similar launch, We can not talk about predictable end, but only certain end. . Just imagine one of those big families consisting of two parents and five children aged between five and fifteen years, in which the father and mother did not give precise indications and directives on what to do and what not to do, about what you should do and what you should not do, on what is allowed and what is prohibited. And suppose that these parents, if anything even implying or stating what not to do and what is forbidden to do, do not indicate in any way what would be the proper punishment given to those who transgress their command. Well: what would happen? . This question I can answer through an image eloquently, sad and humiliating in its squalor for the Church of Christ and for this pontificate. This is the picture that accompanies this article, in which the priest Marco Pozza recovered, chaplain of the Padua prison, He sat before the Pope dressed as a giovanottino casual in sneakers [cf. WHO]. . To clarify the example chosen through which then we will discuss another, We must remember that the Code of Canon Law states today: . Clerics are to wear suitable ecclesiastical dress according to the norms issued by the Episcopal Conference and the legitimate local custom [can. 284]. Clerics are to refrain completely from what is unbecoming to their state, accordance with the provisions of particular law [Can. 285 § 1]. Avoid those things that, although not unbecoming, nevertheless foreign to the clerical state [Can. 285 §2]. . Quoted canon, But we also know the answer of certain subjects, which it is more or less this: "But please, non formalizziamoci! What only matters is peace, the love, mercy, l’accoglienza. Not fossilizziamoci on hard and dry law, roba of legalism farisaici ! What matters it is to stay close to the sheep, take the smell, stinking sheep like them ». . And just before answers of this kind you must remember that in addition to this "dry" canon 284, definitely no peace, love, Mercy, welcome and stench of sheep, There are forty-eight years of papal teaching in the exercise of such, three predecessors of the reigning Pontiff, one of which was canonized and beatified another - perhaps wrongly in the name of the dry law does not merciful or pecoreccia ―, based on this "barren" canon have made repeated appeals to the members of the secular and regular clergy, reiterating in every way that clerical garb, It is not a simple totally unnecessary accessory. He appeals to that effect made them the Blessed Pope Paul VI to Catechesis Audience general of 17 September 1969 [cf. WHO], to follow the Address to Clergy 1st March 1973. Following the circular letter To meet the Congregation for Bishops to all pontifical representatives 27 January 1976. To follow with the Apostolic Letter of the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II, new incipient, of 7 April 1979, addressed to Priests for Holy Thursday. Always under the pontificate of the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II - canonized but not heard, much less follow - follows the Circular of the Congregation for Catholic Education of 6 January 1980, and below that of the Congregation for the Clergy in Directory on the Ministry and Life of Priests, paragraph 66, The obligation of the ecclesiastical, of 31 January 1994. And yet: September 8 1982 the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II wrote a letter to the Vicar General for the Diocese of Rome, published on L'Osservatore Romano the 18-19 October 1982 - at the time when the official organ of the Holy See does not yet talked to San Martin Lutero and his “reform” —, Reaffirming the obligation of Ecclesiastical and stating that in his diocese wished that priests wore a cassock [cf. Then read the text WHO]. On this subject back finally even the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI with his expression turned to the plenary meeting of the Congregation for the Clergy on 16 March 2009 [cf. WHO]. . Given that we shun any of pure spirit and arid formalism, every good Catholic assess by himself indignitosa the scope of the public image of a pretino fashion in clothes casual, that with gym shoes bets on the floor interview the Roman Pontiff. From the same pose of the priest in fact anyone can infer that in his long years of Blessed seminar, surely already tense ever since then social-pecoreccio which today makes such trend, perhaps he never even learned the rudiments of good manners, which is not formalism, because education is part of a style of ecclesial life and ecclesiastical linked to the deeper elements of the priesthood and the sacred pastoral ministry spirituality [I refer to my article on pretini trendy: "I seriously pigliateli, pigliateli my ass' WHO]. . While we roped critical assaulting sometimes disrespectfully and even violent, the Supreme Pontiff for his every breath, on the other we'd like, its staunchest defenders, often no less deranged, They entered the order of ideas that the Holy Father is not perfect and that, precisely for the best protection and preservation of its role, must also necessary to highlight its flaws, which they are not few, and often also produce damage [cf. My previous article WHO]. Otherwise it falls in total imbalance on either side, harming, in one and in the other case, the Church of Christ, the reigning Pontiff and the institution of the papacy. . A few days ago, with firm severity, I criticized the authors of the correction filial [cf. text, WHO] who accused the reigning Pontiff seven heresies expressed in a more or less direct [cf. previous article WHO]. In those few lines, in flush with tones in some passages about the "cruelty", I strongly attacked one of the signatories, Antonio Love [cf. previous article WHO]. And I attacked because first of all the love you very much, They revere him as a senior priest and I consider the philosophical and theological level, one of the largest Italian scholars alive today, as well as the last great representative of the glorious Roman School. . The deference to truth and intellectual honesty, Today I require all the more reason to say that the correction filial It is really nothing, compared to a defense text of the Holy Father which completely distorts the text of The joy of love, taking for granted and impersonating public opinion of the Catholic openings ever written and ever permissioni dates [see text, WHO]. The correction filial, on which stands for the joy of the noisy pro-Lefebvre Catholics the untimely signing of the schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, We remember that it is not in communion with Rome, despite the ill and unilateral concessions to them made by Pope Francis I, there's really nothing, a comparison of the signatures that appear at the end of the text of this effusive Defense: those of many overt heretics. Included among them two excommunicated: Martha Heizer, President of the so-called Basic Association We are church [We are Church], to which has been imposed in 2014 excommunication, not by the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, but by the reigning Pontiff. Excommunication extended to her husband Ehemann Gert [cf. WHO, WHO]. And if these are some of the signatories of the defense, There is something to be feel challenged [reference is made to an article by Marco Tosatti in a stylus assembly, WHO]. . Precisely because of the severity used a few days ago, the evolution of the facts compels me to say that while prosecutors yesterday are mistaken Catholics, defenders today, They are mostly manifest heretics, gangrene in its own subjective view of the Catholic Church, not corresponding to the Church of Christ, with the excuse of The joy of love and specious defense of the Supreme Pontiff, Instead they try to defend and only carry out their dangerous heresies ever. . I used the Ecclesiastical Paradigm and painful picture of casual pretino fashion before the Supreme Pontiff in indignitose conditions, to reiterate that Francis I is the emblem of the parent diseducativo. It is the parent paradigm, Once a decision is made, before the demands of the child explanation, instead of answering says: "Go and ask the neighbor, because he is an experienced parent, he'll give you to the correct interpretation of what I wanted to say '. Just as the Supreme Pontiff said when spurred by questions from journalists invited them to seek guidance to Cardinale Christoph von Schönborn. And you know well that, if there was no cry, it would be funny. . If a parent does not respond to his son, or fails to identify his son, together with the directive or command given, also the eventual punishment in which incur, He is likely to end up with a teenager who returns home drunk and drugged at three am, aware that the other side is not a merciful father, accogliente e includente, but a perfect irresponsible unable to assume their responsibilities. Even worse: even able, if necessary, of blaming the other teenage son who, aware of his age and the risks they can run, He leads a sober life and not going to be of joints around the slums with high-risk persons. And, said this, Please use the specialists of turn of the Holy Gospel and its worst adulteration, not daring to bring up the Parable of the prodigal son [cf. LC 15, 11-32], because it teaches not to take blows to the loyal son and to raise the dissolute son as a model, all sorry and unwilling to correct himself. On the contrary, having run out of money and wondered data earlier by his father, the profligate back to him to ask for more money, and then return to dilapidarli with prostitutes. Because these are the models that often, in Contemporary Church, are made to pass the Prodigal Son, in defiance up to Christ the Lord and his holy gospel they teach anything. . Day after day, the Pope Francis I is showing a parent the height of irresponsibility, but not for that never cease to be, For better or for worse, our rightful parent. Therefore, son grieved, It can also tell: "I wish we had a different parent ', but always animated by the full knowledge that his parent is. And as such it must also accept it and respect it, up to accept, with great suffering, the fact that, and for training the parent, it has never been the task of the children, while helping the parent, this is a real duty of children. . Finally, I offer a small “prophecy” at the end of this comment, entitled: In the death of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI. Which might sound like a far-fetched fall style, if not explained properly. And my little “prophecy” it's this one: Pope Benedict XVI, albeit bruised for understandable issues of age, although always perfectly polished, ninety years played is moving towards the natural end of his life, which could happen any day now. If indeed all, from birth, including infants, children and youth, They can be caught at any time from death, more so it is a nonagenarian. . Given that our churches are increasingly empty, that the cameramen of Vatican Television Center and Sat2000 they do not know from what angle to frame an increasingly deserted Piazza San Pietro, trying to make it appear more or less full of faithful … Well, That said, I say to: the day that will be celebrated the funeral obsequies of Pope Benedict XVI, predecessor of the reigning Pope, God's people will give the last square packed the history of the universal Church. And that square packed, as ever the more you will see in the future, will sign, and at the same time the judgment given by the People of God, the pontificate of a Pope who received and dispensed smiles and words to all, even to a son of Lucifer as Marco Pannella, to a abortista indomita and unrepentant as Emma Bonino, Today a wolf disguised as a lamb as Eugenio Scalfari [cf. John Cavalcoli, WHO]. He received in audience and embraced the worst dittatorelli dell’America Latina, that with great fall style treated him with hugs and pats on the back around his waist; and then use those images in their countries to make the people believe the Bolivian or Venezuelan people, that the Pope was on their side, What obviously false, totally false! But unfortunately, certain images, in the media have devastating impacts, pace of guru communications as Father Antonio Spadaro and Mons. Dario Edoardo Viganò, prudence of which is probably comparable to that of those who chose them and elected to certain offices delicate. . For the Pope Francis I had smiles and answers, except for his brothers in the episcopate devotees, as the four cardinals in a very respectful tone demanded an answer, through the ecclesial form of so-called Dubia. . This is what will happen to the death of Pope Benedict XVI. Unless certain clerical luciferin, sensing also that the square you can not control and that a narrow square crowded around the coffin of 265 ° Successor of Peter, It would be a visible resounding judgment on this pontificate featuring interviews to secular newspapers of great tradition anticlerical, but at the same time it characterized by increasingly empty squares and churches, “Parino the image damage” imposing the celebration of the funeral obsequies privately. If anything inventing - because as such does not beat them to be liars anyone -, that the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI had left her hand that his funeral obsequies were celebrated in private. . They are spilled rivers of ink on the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI who has renounced the Petrine ministry retiring to private life, but nobody has considered its rated “terrible danger” the dead, before a packed square as ever, with an army of Polish Catholics are able to reach Rome - as among others have repeatedly -, even walking and hitchhiking, to be present at the final burial of Pope St. Giovanni Paolo II, canonized, but not heard and not later. And that square crowded as ever, It would be a judgment on the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI, He hated by the worst intelligentsia theological captive-Lutheran, but he loved by Catholics. But it, that square packed, It would also be a terrible judgment on the reign of his successor, which on one side has bestowed smiles to Marco Pannella and Emma Bonino, interviews with Eugenio Scalfari and hugs to arcivescove Lutheran lesbian clad in priestly insignia, and at the same time ushering in the era of a pontificate with increasingly empty churches in Rome and the increasingly deserted Piazza San Pietro, while two of his cardinal devotees died after devotedly served the church all my life and have confirmed devotion in every way the August Pontiff, but he - the merciful -, It not deigned to receive them and to answer. Perhaps he not received them and did not answer because he was too busy to greet the arrival of hordes giovanottoni in perfect physical health, anything but fled famine and wars, all in the age group far below the Thirty Years', to absolute majority Muslims, which they are launched in the colonization of Europe by now dying dechristianized foraggiati funds from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, But even in spite they called foolish and reckless with anything but name: refugees. All this after having demonstrated the ability to read and to be able to articulate well two Latin words: jus soli … . And who will live, will see, the day we bury his Venerable Predecessor Benedict XVI, if they do decide to avoid the big problem giving him a silent funeral, shut up … . From the island of Patmos, 19 October 2017 . . The Marco Pozza’s show . . Here's another priest who unfortunately did not understand that young people in a very special way, Priests of Christ do not want them so tanned, a fare i divetti low alloy jeans before the altar, as demonstrated by the churches in which they speak, where in the audience, more than young people, There are now just old seventies sessantottino, the con artrite reumatoide, remained with them chitarrine in hand to sing God is dead Francesco Guccini, increasingly paralyzed in “forbidden to forbid” and sweet icon “Christ-Che Guevara“. But their sloppiness, give him rope and credit the Supreme Pontiff and miserable television of the Italian Episcopal Conference, that we'd least expected … . . . . «You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32], but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island with your offers through the secure Paypal system: or you can use the bank account: They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930 in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank It does not provide your email and we could not send you a thanksgiving [ email@example.com ] . . . . .