Self-defense confirmed by the Union of idiots and Recognized (U.C.C.R.)

- editorial note -

LEGITIMATE DEFENSE FROM THE UNION OF RECOGNIZED AND CONFIRMED CRETIN (U.C.C.R).

.

In this electronic jungle also the last of the ignorant, putting his hand on the keyboard of a computer behind the anonymity of the network, becomes an arrogant expert in those disciplines to which we, even though we have dedicated them life and long years of study, we continue to have an ever-based approach and awe the humble modesty, so we feel small, limited and deeply inadequate before the great mysteries of faith.

.

Author
Preparation of ’ island of Patmos

.

Marrucine Donkeys, left hand
do not use: in joke and in wine,
napkins of the careless.
Think this is salty?

[Catullo, Carmen XII]

.

.

U.C.C.R. Union of Confirmed and Recognized Cretins

Never the Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo He hath has been irritated with those who have criticized. Lto criticize, that he sometimes practiced severely, subject to the exercise of the freedoms guaranteed [Cost. art. 21]. It falls outside the constitutional rights the right to falsehood, as in the case of homemade blog called U.C.C.R, which would indicate the acronym Union Catholic Christians Rational, where in one written strictly unsigned [cf. WHO] it states:

.

«The worrying phenomenon of media priests who find their outlet in social networks. We know well the "progressive" priests who bitterly fought Benedict XVI from their blogs, like Don Giorgio De Capitani, Don Paolo Farinella, Don Aldo Antonelli, Don Franco Barbero. Even Pope Francis has his enemies among the priest-blogger, this time linked to the heresy of "traditionalism": Don Curzio Nitoglia, don Minutella (recently excommunicated), Don Levi Ariel Gualdo and the various members of the Society of St. Pius X. An exception in the midst of so many good pastors, but a big problem because of their visibility donated by the web ' [cf. WHO].

.

This rant, which also implicitly includes the Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo among the bad shepherds effectively excluding it from the "many good shepherds", is inserted in the delicate context of the Jewish-Christian relationship to discourse on which are necessary high and deep biblical skills, historical and theological, not a group that is defined:

.

"OCCF is just a website, not based, no statute, It has no organic, not impersonating cards and not beating case. The 2 February 2011 as a hobby of a group of university students [cf. WHO] to whom, in no time, join other friends met on the net '.

.

Incidentally, jokers of this homemade blog who call nothing less than "Rational", flying on the fact that to exercise the the task of teaching and the function consacration Sacramento shall grace the bad shepherds as Father Ariel, they should explain in a rational way precisely in which matters the "many good shepherds" they know are busy, to well consider that the turnout to our churches is in free fall, that the Holy Bride of Christ is now marred by a moral and doctrinal crisis without historical precedent, that baptisms are sharp fall together at weddings and the Sacraments of Christian Initiation, while on the surviving confessionals - that is, those that the "many good shepherds" have not yet put in stock or sold to antique dealers -, abounds dust and grow above the cobwebs. And they know, these rational, what is the Diocese who holds the absolute national record of empty churches? Well: is Rome.

.

Marrucine Donkeys, not use your left hand, you use the … [U.C.C.R. Union of Confirmed and Recognized Cretins]

The small group of university students and various friends united in the network, ignore the Father Ariel S. Levi said to prints of Gualdo 12 years ago the book Herbs Amare, the century of Zionism, on the market for six years, several thousand copies sold and considered by scholars of national and international reputation a "milestone on the Jewish phenomenology". In this book 360 pages with 520 historical and scientific notes, the middle section, equal to 120 pages, It is entirely dedicated to the figure of Pius XII, that about the author debunks with irrefutable historical data ideological controversy mounted against this Supreme Pontiff by certain Jewish circles that, as amply demonstrated, all of them were related to various Marxist movements and various international Masonic lodges. The book is currently being reprinted.

.

Unite the Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo to members of the Fraternity of St. Pius X or so-called Lefebvrians, What is indeed grotesque. Indeed, This priest and theologian, Lefebvre has repeatedly indicated as schismatics, accordingly as heretics, repeatedly explaining their mistakes, besides urging on several occasions the Catholic faithful not to participate in their sacred celebrations and not to receive from them the Sacraments, except in the case of life threatening, because in this case even a priest excommunicated and dismissed from the clerical state can administer the sacraments validly [cann. 976; 986 §2; can. 883 n. 3].

.

Marrucine Donkeys, not use your left hand, you use the … [U.C.C.R. Union of Confirmed and Recognized Cretins]

Regarding the priest Alessandro Minutella, in a sorrowful article signed by Fathers de The Island of Patmos Ariel S. Levi Gualdo and Father John Cavalcoli [cf. WHO], the two theologians have begged him to backtrack. Soon after, father ariel, not having obtained no effect, he bitterly referred to as a model not to follow, inviting him to renew his profession of obedience to the bishop in communion with the Bishop of Rome [cf. WHO].

.

then indicate the Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo as' Papa Francesco enemy " and it tied to the "heresy of traditionalism", denotes two different forms of folly: first of all do not know the devotion that this priest feeds to the Successor of Peter, therefore confuse the legitimate criticism of certain expressions or certain pastoral choices of the Roman Pontiff with those that are its acts of teaching, before which repeatedly, in four years a publicist on the online magazine The Island of Patmos, He called on the due obedience, because "If the Supreme Pontiff gives off a motu proprio, the matter is closed and there is nothing to argue about, It just has to obey ".

.

Marrucine Donkeys, not use your left hand, you use the … [U.C.C.R. Union of Confirmed and Recognized Cretins]

These university goliardic that are revealed theologians, ecclesiologists and canonists hobby, they are therefore qualified and disqualified with the expression "heresy of conservatism", ignoring that the Holy Fathers and Doctors of the Church, the Catholic tradition They have spread and defense, some until the shedding of their blood. Indeed, changing the word "tradition" and "traditionalism" in the negative sense until even use it as a synonym for heresy, It is to affirm authentic nonsense, such as those in the negative sense they use the words "dogma" and "dogmatic". It would be enough to know it only superficially and also the documents of the Second Vatican Council to know how many times the Fathers of the Church assembled in this assizes reflect and recall the tradition and respect for tradition, variously defined as "holy", as "sacred" and as a "perennial".

.

Given these premises, the boys of U.C.C.R blog They are likely to be counted in the Union of idiots and confirmed Recognized, Please take for what they are, especially as intellectually they prove to be worth, in this electronic jungle where even the last of the ignorant, putting his hand on the keyboard of a computer behind the anonymity of the network, becomes an arrogant expert in those disciplines to which we, even though we have dedicated them life and long years of study, we continue to have an increasingly approach based on the humble awe and modesty, so we feel small, limited and deeply inadequate before the great mysteries of faith.

.

the Island of Patmos, 29 November 2018

.

.

Finally invite “scientists” del blog U.C.C.R. to deny this Lectio on a purely and strictly theological level, or otherwise declare that the Gospels Saints and the Blessed Evangelists were wrong

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

21 replies
  1. Nobody
    Nobody says:

    Dad, it may import, to the low value of an unknown virtual light of support, She has all my respect. The state that I often do not like (or perhaps I understand) his “biting wit”, However, omitting the form, I approve in full the substance of almost all its contents. To paraphrase Orwell “the kingdom universal deceit, the truth is a revolutionary act”, and some of his articles (as truthful) They have bothered to more people (especially the exhibition on the sacred vestments in New York, She was one of the few in Italy to make us learn how celebrities devoted to occult symbols have them “desecrated”). She also was associated with a subject that, subject of a television report of Reservoir Dogs, He claims to communicate with the Holy Virgin, this is a clear attempt to discredit his work and his person because, unconsciously analysis, the player puts on the same plane.
    Be wise and not face their game: too easily they manage to put in dispute the certain and to obscure the true!
    Thank you.

  2. hector
    hector says:

    With that sequence of malignancy, lies, lies, insults and gossip, with that reckless assimilation of names and positions, making lump, taking fireflies for lanterns, those "ignorant" of the OCCF have proved their arrogant incompetence because: 1. or have never read; 2. or can not read, maybe they stop at titles; 3. or they do not really understand what is written, "Recommended to the doubters" and "taught the ignorant" by Don Ariel and the other Fathers of the Island.
    Always it's a case of imprudent ignorance, and not of an insolent provocation designed ... just to be beautiful in the eyes of someone.
    The worst example of which are the fruits of bad teaching, a bad judgment, a lack of knowledge of the Gospel: it is clear that "they know not what they do".
    should not stay at their game, beyond a righteous indignation and a dutiful and stern warning, not really worth worrying too much and make the bitter blood; It is not the confused opinion of these "young offenders" who is to be feared, But the judgment of God who reads the hearts.

  3. vincenzo from turin
    vincenzo from turin says:

    I read gladly blog OCCF for years and I find it beneficial. But this time I have been mistaken sensational and it bothers me and wonder. I sincerely hope that will give a public denial with an adjustment.

  4. Don Piero
    Don Piero says:

    But you are serious? An article full of teenage hatred silly, wrote for “vendetta” (O “law of retaliation”) and mangles the names and puts the photos of donkeys. And would you be theologians? The defenders of the holy Catholic doctrine? Of the little children in kindergarten would do best figure of the mysterious Levi Gualdo….you have no sense of the ridiculous.

  5. Fabrizio Giudici
    Fabrizio Giudici says:

    The more appropriate comparison wrote Don Ciro last sentence. The OCCF (for which use acronyms other than the title) It was one of the largest Catholic disappointments. Around 2013 They were not so, but then they degraded quickly. R muddying of rationality, They have become a vulgar clerical site “character assassination” that targets anyone who does not abide even the commas of what comes from Santa Marta. There is no discussion or that takes. It is better not to read them, I do not do for years, except occasionally be updated on their businesses “rebound”, as in this case. They will go down with the rest of the rotten part of the visible Church.

    • Paul says:

      I agree on everything, in the past I read it willingly. For years now the rationale has nothing. Pity.

  6. Erick
    Erick says:

    I agree with the fact that those who too easily talk about “many good shepherds” does not see reality from a Christian point of view, and because if a Catholic Christian “God will destroy our society ” It is also very common x faults and failings of the Catholic pastors zeal.
    However, Don Ariel if you really want to be devoted to the Holy Father should try – even him – a language more suited to the devotion to the priesthood and maybe venturing, without fear, in a specific soul. With affection. Erick.

  7. islander
    islander says:

    Such a pity… Many news and interventions OCCF are interesting and certainly heretics than the dominant culture (one for all: the file on “case” Mother Teresa), even with all the limitations of the blog and form “homemade”.
    After a year off, They resumed this summer and some items are based on a single, irrevocable Manichean classification (very rational): the pro-Francis and the counter-Francis. In the latter category are placed without distinction all those who have even dared to utter only a sigh of Francesco, obviously signed de “The Editorial Staff”. As an example:

    https://www.uccronline.it/2018/10/10/il-premier-conte-schiaffo-a-la-verita-le-accuse-di-vigano-assurde-e-pretestuose/ [HELP!!]

    https://www.uccronline.it/2018/09/28/aver-chiesto-le-dimissioni-al-papa-un-errore-di-vigano-i-blogger-si-arrendono/

    https://www.uccronline.it/2018/10/03/vescovi-cinesi-a-san-pietro-la-commozione-del-papa-e-la-cattiveria-dei-blogger-farisei-video/

    Hopefully OCCF can once again become what it claims to be. Maximum solidarity with Father Ariel, I look forward to buying herbs Love and other works

  8. father ariel
    Don Ciro says:

    Put Ariel dad in the midst of those people indicated as antipapist and traditionalist heretic, it's like putting a camel to water the pile dell'Acquasanta the cathedral church of Naples, city ​​where the camels are grazing on the slopes of Mount Vesuvius in the same measure in which the “Catholics” this blog are OCCF “rational”.

  9. father ariel
    Andrea Falciani (Rome) says:

    I read The Island of Patmos from 2015, I found the, I remember, at Christmas, and I was struck by theological comments on Ariel Father Incarnate Word.
    I am a subscriber since the newsletter and do not remember to have ever read anything signed by this theologian who put in question the authority of Pope Francis.
    he turned to his criticism, sometimes severe, But ever addressed to his teaching, only his arm speeches, impromptu utterances, interviews with Scalfari … and I remember several homilies own unhappy, but unfortunate enough to embarrass themselves iperbergogliani, that in fact were silent.
    If Father Ariel criticized or questioned a magisterial act of the Pope, please let, because I've never read.

  10. father ariel
    Don Angelo Rossit says:

    Pigliamola laughing, although on certain things we tend to get hurt.
    Of course, father put Ariel in the soup, It is like throwing a glass of holy water in a pot of boiling oil frying …

  11. father ariel
    Claudia Sabatini says:

    Father Ariel in that … minestrone Article?
    no, but not really!
    The person put in the wrong place and the wrong company.
    Which pro, and to the delight of those who, This absurd insult to the person?

  12. Attilio
    Attilio says:

    I'd like to understand where they read attacks on the Pope on this blog. You are always careful to express your thoughts paying attention to the words you use. They should apologize and especially read some books on the tradition since they consider it heresy

  13. father ariel
    Don Francesco Messina says:

    For Gentlemen U.C.C.R say serenely priest: read the homilies of Father Ariel, then read the homilies of Santa Marta, and rationally, very rationally, because you are rational, assessed and then given a judgment, obviously rational …

  14. Salvatore Di Majo
    Salvatore Di Majo says:

    I also collaborated with me “boys” the OCCF until October 2013, then they did not require other items, and the fact it has pained me for nothing. The rest, each item I required a lot of time to consult texts, read up…However, all articles that were published were always signed – my there are still, just look for them within the site. The experience was positive, however,, each article generated a discussion where, in addition to the usual trolls and “Keyboard lions” only good for insulting even by resorting to vulgar blasphemy, there were also many who were confronted civilly to me or to other visitors of the portal. I do not follow their work more, private as they are for obvious reasons of elements suitable for making a judgment, I note that on the web confrontation between Catholics become increasingly harsh. We should be better prepared in comparison with atheists, agnostics, determinants vari…Instead we logoriamo in endless disputes when we should remember that “God was pleased to save those who believe by the foolishness of preaching” (1 Color. 1, 21). Actually we talk about him, (quasi) no one listens…

Comments are closed.