The ancient lie of the Jews about the resurrection of Christ. A reflection against the false Christian-Jewish interfaith dialogue by Andrea Riccardi and the Community of Sant'Egidio
Presbyter and Theologian
( Click on the name to read all its articles )
- "Something is changed". From Jack Nicholson to Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi honorary degree from the University of Catania - 14 April 2024
- The fans of Mary co-redemptrix, a gross contradiction in theological terms - 6 February 2024
- A good priest is such if he waits for the end of his mandate to praise his Bishop: Andrea Turazzi, from today Bishop emeritus of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro - 3 February 2024
- the videos of The Island of Patmos -
ANCIENT JEWISH LIE OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST. A REFLECTION AGAINST FAKE JEWISH-CHRISTIAN DIALOGUE OF ANDREA RICCARDI AND SANT'EGIDIO COMMUNITY
.
Who does not believe in the resurrection of Christ, consistently considers Christians children of a lie. But the important thing is to talk ... talk ... Yes, that is fine: but talk about what? Because if these are the premises, would be more consistent that certain dialogues, instead of being called interfaith dialogue, were called interpolitici dialogues, intended only to make the joy of capocomici of syncretism and religious relativism.
.
.
Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
.
Sunday of Easter 2017, in photo: Ariel S. Levi Gualdo on the background of Pollica Cilento from Villa Belvedere “The fortress” Pearson.
Narrated that the chief priests bribed the guards placed in custody of the tomb with "a good sum of money" so referred it false [cf. Mt 28, 12-14], The Evangelista Matteo concludes the story with a sentence about why you can not fly: "So this story has been reported among the Jews until this day" [Mt 28, 15].
.
Riguardo Christ's death it should be stressed the Romans have carried a sentence willed Jewish religious authority. A historical fact that no one can rewrite to avoid irritating a posteriori the susceptibility of the modern Sanhedrin, or not to disturb certain insane interfaith dialogue the Sant'Egidio - that have nothing in common with the healthy inter-religious dialogue of the document Our life? —, and that some would not hesitate to sacrifice the very foundations of our faith and the historicity of Santi Vangeli, just to talk at all costs and whatever the cost.
.
The question is therefore simple: the Body of Christ, It was stolen by his followers, who then they are given birth to a lie, or, Christ is truly risen, and others have lied ?
.
we can do all we want interreligious dialogue, but one thing remains certain: or they lied to the Disciples of Christ, or they lied to the Jews, because thesis and antithesis can not have both reason
Andrea Riccardi and the Community of Sant’Egidio They can communicate what and with whom they want, ma, two thousand years later, It remains standing the following question: between the two different parts, one said the real, the other has lied and spread false. Only one party has told the truth, while the other has adulterated the facts, lied and spread false. For he that says a fact and anyone who denies firmly that fact, can not both be right, It is a foundation of logic and common sense. Therefore, which of them lied: Disciples of Christ, or the heads of the Sanhedrin?
.
Hyear lied those who announced the resurrection, or the Jews in stating that overnight, the human body of the Word of God made man, It was stolen from the tomb? Because that is what you truly dialogue. If not, instead take a coffee smooth kosher with the bosses of the modern Sanhedrin to great carnival syncretism and religious relativism of Assisi, organized by Andrea Riccardi and the Community of Sant'Egidio, It can not serve nor ever going to do anything, let alone the truth that will set us free [cf. GV 8, 32]. A truth that we are called to care for and announce, not to dilute, not to haggle, especially with those who consider us children of a colossal lie [following video …]
.
.
To open the video click on this
.
.
___________________________________
Dear Readers,
we invite you to support The Island of Patmos that always carries their apostolic work only thanks to your offers that you can send using the convenient and safe system PayPal or our WERE GOING, which you can find on the right of home-page. We pray those who use the code WERE GOING send us an email [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ], so that we can send a message of thanks. If you bid by PayPal, There comes a notification with the email address of the donor, If you do use the code WERE GOING, in that case the banking system does not signal us your email and in that case we would not be possible to answer them and to thank.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Dear don Ariel,
long ago I became convinced that the real problem between Jews and Christians from '700 is that many Jews did not believe and do not believe their religion, without believing in Christ. So they tried to translate this their existential state, which in itself would be quite sad, in ersatz faiths in Modernity, in Progress, in Science, in Politics and the cancellation of any other religion, from Christianity. Obviously, in this willingly supported by many former Christians. Now then we got to pretastri who say that after all, via, do not know what he really said Jesus, and so cunningly they have everyone happy. Returning to the Jewish world, She teaches me that it is actually very diverse and not uniform, but now I think the most dangerous are those Jews apparent that in reality the product of '68 and political ideologies. They are trying to rewrite history for example to show that it is not true that the Catholics and protected it helped Jews under Nazi persecution (cf.. The smear campaign not only against Pius XII, but for example also against Giovanni Palatucci).