The issue of Humanae Vitae is simple: make love and do it well. Who establishes new dogmas is worse than those dogmas places them into question and then deconstructs them

THE QUESTION OF HUMAN LIFE IS SIMPLE: MAKE LOVE AND DO IT WELL. WHO PROVIDES NEW DOGMAS IS ABOUT WORST I DOGMAS PUTS THEM IN DISCUSSION AND THEN deconstruct LI

.

Many of those who talk about environmentalism, nature and naturalness, ready to spend on a piece of clothing ten times as long as non-woven synthetic fibers, as unnatural and potentially harmful to the human body, as may be considered instead put a natural rubber condom as a synthetic suit on the male member of the male during a very natural sexual intercourse? It's a track suit most harmful and unnatural made with synthetic fabrics, or a condom that comes between the man and the woman during the naturalness of love?

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

PDF format Print article

.

.

during the great winter of the Church, Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo wearing clothing preferred by Pope Francis I

I would like to start the whole speech from a very practical aspect which constitutes a premise due: the pastoral and sacramental aspect. Why me, although choice of life always wear a cassock and in winter even the woolen cloak and Saturn on the head - those intended for that please the Pope Francis I [see WHO] ―, a priest with the smell of the sheep truly are. This is not because the purchase at the Vatican City perfumery Water sheep fragrance for men [Perfume for men Water Sheep], but why always good time to step into the confessional, as well as in contact with the faithful, Today increasingly lost and disoriented. It is for the reigning Pontiff then determine that certain teologoni, what they are now all poor, poverty, existential suburbs, jus soli and so, the confessional not approach even for years, but especially, if a faithful dare stop to exchange a few words or ask for clarification on one or more questions, always going to respond quickly, rather annoyed with pure air: "Make an appointment with my secretary '. Not to mention what would happen if these shepherds at the last minute Water Sheep, someone put in the hands of the Holy Oil and tell them ... "Go to the anointing of the sick to an ill or a dying". Maybe if they would pick the answer that God is mercy, therefore, his forgiveness, disregarded, sacramental signs, or would answer something more or less similar; certainly they would not say not to know even where to start in the administration of this precious Sacramento, which also requires a delicacy and extraordinary humanity united with deep Christian faith, not only in those who receive it, but also in who administers. And these, just to clarify, are in fact the closest collaborators and most influential of the reigning Pontiff, that from first to last he is so determined to keep strictly around, or that, rather, They have closed it as a caged bird.

.

On suffered encyclical of Blessed Pope Paul VI I wrote many pages in the time and I did on it several catechesis and lectiones, first of all to place it - or if you prefer to contextualize it - in its historical-social and ecclesial context. I have not failed to explain that that encyclical constituted for Blessed Pope Paul VI, an authentic trauma from which he never recovered, testing is something that was his last encyclical, to which followed another ten years of tormented pontificate, without've written more other. This is enough to understand that the Humanae Vitae He has left an indelible mark on him first of all to those who have written.

.

Today, in the season of throw it all away, the read, the reinterpret and rewrite, but most of the revolution - the word as I have often explained incompatible with the very essence of Christianity -, also there Humanae Vitae It had to be subjected to this process. And, said this, I note that behind this there is the great destructive machine of the Jesuits new generation, not by chance, the first study conference was held to that effect just at the Pontifical Gregorian University, where now a Catholic does not fight the nail, why was no need of the Reverend Professor Maurizio Chiodi to introduce the "re-reading" of Humanae Vitae [cf. WHO]. Obviously in this seat and between these lines I avoid doing a historical analysis on what were the Jesuits in hard level moral mainly linked to human sexuality and to what it is connected, and everything from 1814, date of their re-establishment, until the nineteen sixties. Not to mention the relationship with the woman, what is now many of them do not just active and involved in the Church - which has always been active and involved -, but they want can become a deacon, then the priest. Sincerely, that the very order more moralistic and especially more misogynistic entire history of the Church, Today bring forward and spread these proposals peregrine, not even deserve a proper excursus old on his last two centuries of life, rather a comic-ironic wrote, it being understood that if they were writing could never do better than what he had to do in the seventeenth century, Blaise Pascal in his work "the Provincial» [cf. WHO], which it argues on its unusual and original Christian morality of the Jesuits. It should be noted that in fact the same as yesterday threatened the flames of Hell to a poor teenager who looked at with one eye at a distance girl, They are the same that today declare legitimate to judge facts and actions according to circumstances, to the point of no longer accommodate the sinner to be redeemed, nor the heretic to be corrected by his serious errors, because today, sin on the one hand and heresy on the other hand, They are defined by the Jesuits new generation as "precious diversity". And if someone replies to such nonsense with evangelical morality, sortirsene out here is the Superior General of New East India Company that in response gave an interview to inform us that at the time of Jesus Christ did not have the recorder, so we can not know what the Word of God made man actually said [cf. WHO].

.

Before proceeding with the example that follows I must make an aside: sometimes a player, those who read our columns to the likely taste to catch us in a lie, He wrote to me and scolded harshly accusing me of talking too much about myself. Or good, let's be reasonable: when is it, I speak of myself? Having written thousands and thousands of pages, I think I can say, without this being easily refuted, I use myself to talk about various experiences of human character, spiritual, doctrinal, then transpose and translate all in the theological and pastoral practice. Anyone who has in fact attended the lectures of distinguished academics competed in the various specialties, will have certainly noticed that this professor who also practices as a criminal defense lawyer, during his criminal law classes she will tend to lead to students various exacting personal experiences to better explain how it works in practice a process, after all that has preceded it and above all set in motion. And how many times, professors of various clinical professorships, with a life spent in operating rooms, tell students of postgraduate courses with such fear and trembling for the first time took a scalpel in his hand to affect the flesh of a human being, or how complex it was that particular surgery on a patient suffering from a very rare form of cancer, and the manner in which he proceeded surgical operation. We may follow up with the design engineer, the architect, biologist, the chemical. And, with the same approach, you could finally take this as an example for our discussion the Blessed Apostle Paul, who repeatedly tells himself, their experiences and apostolic journeys, to better introduce its predication focused on the more arcane mysteries of Revelation. What to say of St. Augustine, whereas for this purpose abundantly spoke of himself in the work Confessiones? Because in this work the holy Bishop of Hippo speaks directly if, He explains his conversion to Christianity and his life, starting from his early life as a libertine profligate. St. Augustine was perhaps a self-centered narcissist, or simply he wanted instead to send this clear message: "If someone like me has welcomed the grace of God, It is acceptable to everyone it is even slightly open "? And he was following the example of St. Augustine - and certainly not for "shameless narcissism" as someone said -, that long ago I wrote an article I also accompanied by old personal photos, related to my previous existence to Aurelio Thagaste, thus giving concrete evidence of a conversion that took me up to the Sacred Order of Priests [cf. WHO]. Or maybe I should talk about the experience of some other, to say how the youthful debauchery can be reached even to the ministerial priesthood?

.

Closed this engraved that at some point I had considered, I proceed now with an example of real life that still makes me smile so sincere but also bitter, thinking back to when years ago, one of my trainers Jesuits, said my Bishop calmly and cryptic so I was certainly a prime candidate for the priesthood, but I had to learn, however, the best moral aspect, so that was suggested to me to do, instead of dogmatic theology, specialist courses in Moral. The reason for this advice was cryptic due precisely to Humanae Vitae, about which I said that I quote again today as they are: "This document of Pope Paul VI is likely to remain a closed discussion on the level of discipline, but open on that of theological speculation. Indeed, the use of contraceptives prohibition, although it is the supreme expression supported teaching on natural law and the traditio catholica, it can not be, today and even tomorrow, supported on dogmatic elements such as resorting ex cathedra a solemn pronouncement of the infallible magisterium. Indeed, throughout the Old Testament literature and novo, there is only one solid supporting element to keep standing at the level dogmatic discipline which establishes the use of contraceptives prohibition; which it is a theological discipline in my opinion very wise and timely, but that can not be dogmatized. And who today dogmatizza, shows really do not know what is the dogma, or what is the dogmatic stand that holds an ecclesiastical or canonical discipline ".

.

Regarding the doctrine contained in Humanae Vitae which prohibits the use of contraceptives, It was never expressed an opinion of the Church in the solemn form of the definition, like the first instance by targeting all those teachings belonging to the dogmatic and moral, which are necessary for faithfully keeping and expounding the deposit of faith. In this regard, just read the Apostolic Letter of the Holy Father John Paul II, To defend the faith, of 29.05.1998 [text WHO]. This discipline sanctioned by Blessed Pope Paul VI is to be understood as set forth infallibly, provided that no theologian, more or less versed in precise doctrinal and moral matters, ends up confuse a pronouncement infallibility linked to the so-called second degree with the proclamation of a new dogma of the Catholic Faith; why this, It is a grave error in which certain so-called risk falling penalty takers: inventing dogmas that do not exist.

.

Never should we lose sight the two opposites that lead to different routes at the same erroneous result: on one hand the Karl Rahner and Hans Küng who initiated the reasoned dogma ..., to re-interpreted dogma, to moving the dogma and evolving. All this leads to an inevitable consequence, that to be honest - and this must be said - it was not in the plans premeditated and spirals of Rahner, namely the de-construction of the dogma. Indeed, when they trigger certain mechanisms, the engine then ends with the hand flee primarily to those who have activated, that's why a Rahner inevitably arises a Küng, but also arise various Karl Lehmann, Walter Kasper e Reinhard Marx, that manifest itself in fact ancòra worse than it is on Küng, have waited until he had made that great ecclesiastical career at which Küng, to be honest and correct, He has shown in practice that it never sucked, revealing by far a lot more honest and consistent than these. On the other side, But do not ever forget those who declare instead of dogma that just does not exist. And these days, two of the new dogmas proclaimed by certain parties, are n. 84 of Family company, forward-looking and beautiful post-synodal apostolic exhortation of the Holy Father John Paul II, which is followed by the dogma of "no Holy Communion for divorced and remarried". And soon they, in our churches, begin to recite a faith Nicene Creed something like integrated: "I believe in God the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible; I believe that the divorced and remarried should be excluded from the Holy Eucharistic Communion ". And maybe, the part of The profession of faith in which acclaims the mystery of the Incarnation of the Word and its consubstantiality with the Father, It will be made to precede the more important article of faith: "I believe in the dogma of the prohibition of contraception".

.

Having said that I can continue affirming more and worse, because elements such as error, heresy and sin, have their scale in relation both to the concept is given to the objective of their gravity, all linked to the knowledge, to the will and deliberate consent. In conclusion, the ethics of Aristotle good then transposed in support of the truths of faith by St. Thomas Aquinas. And, even without resorting to examples that would be many and articulated, I say "knowledge" because not everyone is aware that certain acts and actions are gravely sinful, especially in those in whom the natural sense of right and wrong is very small, in some severe and special cases is virtually non-existent. And in these cases, the concept of "fault", as we play, place the blame is not a useful game to give work to modern revived the decaying neoscholasticism, but objective data that comes from acting consciously subjective?

.

But let's talk of doctrinal errors or of the same heresies, for instance: by Joachim of Fiore, holy man of God, until the latest Antonio Rosmini, today Beato, it happened that even saints and men of God have inadvertently fallen into heretical thoughts, from which then they are corrected, without that an adverse effect on their holiness. Of the same Gioacchino da Fiore, whose heresy was condemned by the Fourth Lateran Council, just as it was during his cause of beatification, the Fathers of the Church gathered in that meeting to reconcile, in pointing out the errors in his famous pamphlet, They did not fail to clearly highlight also its unquestionable sanctity of life. But you can not say the same of the Augustinian Martin Luther monaco, one of the largest and most poisonous heretics entire history of the Church, whose life and try action without any possibility of contradiction that was not in good faith or that he was a man of God, This pace of reigning Pontiff who described it as "reformer" and "well-intentioned" [cf. WHO], followed by the Secretary General of the Italian Episcopal Conference which rincarata calling the dose: 'Gift of the Holy Spirit " [cf. WHO]. Needless to say, the first, he made certain statements colloquially speaking of this and that, not that they have any certain high-ranking magisterium; the second, it is expressed in this way simply because it is a dangerous ignorant with the burden of the ride the wave of the moment, as we have repeatedly emphasized our Fathers de The island of Patmos debating on purely theological issues, and certainly not on the person of Galantino, up and especially to agree to show that his is a thought - if you really do not want to say heretical - at least not Catholic; and the non-Catholic all'ereticale is a short step, even for a secretary-general of the Italian Episcopal Conference [cf. WHO].

.

All this is to introduce a simple question: It is more serious challenge and deconstruct the tenets of the Holy Catholic Faith, or is more severe proclaim new dogmas? Undoubtedly it is more serious the second thing, who in fact wrong and sowing confusion among the people of God, It calls into question the dogmas through rereading and reinterpreting, until reaching to their de-construction, not necessarily be motivated by evil intentions, because the whole can also be the result of the bad theological formation now transmitted by over half a century to whole generations of priests and theologians. Many are my brethren who, priests came out from our seminars affected by natural disasters and to the best of abbeveratisi heterodoxies directly taught in ecclesiastical universities, where, if anything, have also received specialist diplomas and doctorates, they are really convinced that bad is good, that the defect is virtues, that heresy and orthodoxy is that Orthodoxy is heresy; and I must say that quite a few of them, induced to think, They have also come to admit that they have received a bad theological formation and a bad formation for the priesthood, and sought, almost always with hard work and great sacrifice, to put everything to a possible remedy. Those who admit any of this ever, despite their disturbing gaps, we are seeing them become bishops one after the other under this happy pontificate, other cardinals and some other ancòra prefect of a dicastery of the Holy See. Therefore, those who proclaim dogmas that do not exist, It accomplishes a greater error, because it operates by placing itself above the authority of the same Holy Church Mater et Magistra, holder of authority that it comes from Christ himself; and the latter yes, which it is rather a dogma of the Catholic Faith, which has not come to logical deduction, but just on the basis of clear and precise words spoken by the Word of God made Man [cf. Mt 13, 16-20]. And when you proclaim dogmas that they do not exist and that may not even exist, in that case we are indeed in evil, because here enters the worst pride, which as he explained years ago John Cavalcoli is the intellectual pride, which it constitutes the "apology of pride» [cf. WHO]. It is in fact necessary to point out that the so-called scale of the deadly sins, pride comes first, painful with respect to those who, so indeed stubborn and incorrigible, He would like to concentrate in lust - that we remember not figure at all in the first place, but even the second and third - the whole mystery of evil, regardless of the fact that the worst sins ranging everyone and rigor from his belt to rise, not instead of his belt to fall, as ironically but very seriously theologically I wrote three years ago [cf. WHO].

.

Of course I know better from going to ask today, in quell'ormai old Jesuit to whom I previously mentioned a moment ago, He remained in his time alarmed by my speech on the relationship between Humanae Vitae e dogma, As this would be willing to send some of its most illustrious brothers to do postgraduate studies in Moral, or perhaps better ancòra on the fundamentals of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, all starting from the General of the Society of Jesus to follow with Father Antonio Spadaro, director of Catholic Civilization. In fact, when a company ceases to be a Jesuit, to become a middle ground between a clan and a destructive cancer within the Church, at that point, its affiliates, would be truly able to say that all in all, the Holy Spirit, case by case basis, It may be wrong, But the Jesuits no.

.

This is to say that because of the Humanae Vitae, over time I felt give the modernist by so-called ultra-traditionalists, and at the same time of the traditionalist by modernists today, to be clear, Finally they made their coup and imprisoned Peter as a caged bird inside this old Church before which, the reigning Pontiff, It should meditate very well on these words, because Christ God has addressed to him:

.

"In truth, I say to you: when you were younger, you used to dress yourself, and walked where you; but when you are old you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do not want ' [GV 21,18].

.

Again because of a public debate on Humanae Vitae It was also referred to in the past as an "element suspect" by a certain Thomas Williams, Legionary of Christ and professor of moral theology at the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum. This Lord who for several years has left the priesthood, time, although already the father of two children born in secret with the daughter of the American ambassador to the Holy See [cf. WHO], He was able to explain in the course of an entire lesson now than was the deadly sin of masturbation of a teenager. And God only knows what this poor guy literally jumped in the air, when I reminded him that he, in his capacity as doctor of moral, before certain issues related to adolescence and developmental age, He was to say the least required to show understanding and wider Christian charity manifested by the Church and by the same imprinted clearly in the Catechism:

.

"To form an equitable judgment about the subjects' moral responsibility and to guide pastoral action, It will take into account the affective immaturity, force of acquired habit, conditions of anxiety, or other psychological or social factors that may mitigate, if not minimize, moral culpability " [CCC, n. 2352, text WHO].

.

Today, il Signor Thomas Williams, who at the time of his rigorous discourse he was already secretly father and concubine, blessing God has left the ministerial priesthood and religious life, but the damage that he, as others like him have done on many people, They were often truly irreparable, but especially, the competent ecclesiastical authority, It is in fact carefully refrained from safeguard actions decided by the many young men in formation for religious life and the many young priests who were under the clutches of these squalid subjects demonic.

.

Not to leave the suspended speech and not to give foothold to specialized moralists in masturbologia teen with adjoining and connected all the consequent flames Hell, I have no problem to clarify the following: if a teenager who had not received the grace bestowed in San Luigi Gonzaga, being in the throes of hormonal storms are difficult to control, if not uncontrollable, does not resort to masturbation, it is appropriate to bring it to a neurologist, because there are two solutions: or is it, precisely, a new San Luigi Gonzaga, and in that case we are both part of the grace of both the individual holiness which also goes by the gifts of grace, or, in quell'adolescente, There is something very seriously wrong; why I say that it is appropriate to take him to a good neurologist. Obviously, if an adult male, lives and express their sexuality through compulsive masturbation, at that point it is not appropriate to address it at a good psychiatrist, also and above all because in that case, There is something very seriously wrong in the right direction. And, said this, leaving some Catholics shouting "scandal!"With a style that would not shame the prudish Victorian England of the nineteenth century - as in the past complained some accusing me of having spoken express masturbation, instead of resorting to vague euphemisms clerical-nineteenth, thus giving me the real vulgar shameless -, about what serious and I just wrote scientific, I await response and possibly a retraction driven by scientific rigor on the part of the leading experts in bioethics. And precisely these specialists say again my question: a teenager who is not San Luigi Gonzaga and does not resort to masturbation, It should or should not be carried by the neurologist to verify whether in its psycho-physical structure everything is in place, or if there is some serious problem both in its psychology and in its physical and hormonal development?

.

Obviously, these logical deductions, can hardly reach the moralists and the hard-core bioethical ingravidano that the daughters of ambassadors and conducting parallel twin screw, up to send to hell a poor teenager with hormones out of control he has run masturbated in full evolutionary transition age. Needless to say, before these shameful facts related to a total lack of moral sense on the part of many who have always hit others with their more rigid moral, It sounds like a symphony orchestra is the warning of the Holy Gospel:

.

"They tie up heavy burdens and lay them on men's shoulders, but they don't want to move them even with a finger» [Mt 23,4].

.

Before proceeding any further to quibble about the reasons and opportunities for which the Humane Vitae should be left unchanged, if anything, highlighting its validity and in other respects its prophetic aspect, focused mostly on respect for women and its protection, I would like to have recourse to another example having as its object the so-called usual, ie those who, when they hear the sound of the magic Latin They lose all sense of reason and all kinds of critical thinking, with the consequent total distortion of the objective reality. In this way it is when S.It is. Mons. Mario Oliveri, Bishop emeritus of Albenga, was not at all removed from his episcopal see as responsible - partly involuntary -, to have a reduced Diocese to an authentic lupanare, to a collection center for overt homosexuals thrown out for serious moral problems from one or more seminars, up to end up with a considerable number of uncontrollable priests dedicated to every kind of vice and scams useful asset to the maintenance of their vices. None of this jump in the least in the eyes of the usual suspects who, undeterred and obstinate, continue to say and write that the poor prelate was persecuted by "false modernist Church" because he loved The old rite of the Mass, used jeweled mitres seventy centimeters high and giving out Holy Communion all'inginocchiatoio under the canopy supported by knights frak [cf. WHO, WHO, etc. …].

.

Just as it happened - say the usual suspects -, to the members of the Congregation of the Franciscan Friars, not only punished according to them for organizing conferences criticism of Karl Rahner, to have shown the danger of Modernism and Freemasonry; but first and foremost because persecuted they celebrated, also, needless to say, Mass with The old rite of the Mass.

.

Well, dear friends Usual note, let me use that sincerity and honesty that sometimes you do not miss touches you from afar: of these columns, the Dominican Pontifical John Academic Cavalcoli and I, Karl Rahner, on Modernism and Modernists, and so on Freemasonry, we did not shoot in bursts, because we exploded against them of repeated blows heavy mortar, with a much higher severity than that used in the past conferences promoted by the Franciscans. You should therefore ask you: because, to us, there are still police? I repeat: because we, even though we have severely blamed Karl Rahner indicated as the originating source of all heresies return to invade the Church today, His seminars and its ecclesiastical universities, They have not yet police?

.

Celebrities, dear friends Usual note, When some years ago I had to talk to one of the most distinguished mariologists of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, I was very impressed both by his arrogance and above all by his pride, because he gave de facto already proclaimed the dogma of Mary Co. As a result, within that congregation ever proclaimed the dogma of Mary Co was in fact already a dogma, complete with a consequent theology and promoted and widespread cult. And all, note well, in complete disregard of the fact that all the Popes of the twentieth century, including those particularly devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mary, although pleaded in this sense, would not ever consider the possible proclamation of this new Marian dogma; and among them is enough to mention the Holy Pontiff Pius X, the Venerable Pope Pius XII, Blessed Pope Paul VI and the Holy Father John Paul II, the emblem of the Blessed Virgin, He had wanted engraved on his papal coat of arms, to say how much of it was devoted.

.

I understand that the dear friends Usual note, certain words can sound almost flush with the blasphemy, but I repeat: if questioning the dogma of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption into Heaven of the Blessed Virgin Mary is wrong, as well as serious and potential breeding ground for dangerous heresies, on the other hand, promulgate made a dogma, and act accordingly, up to disseminate so impudent theology, and what remains is much more serious. And if in the face of these as of other things, at some point the Holy See intervenes, It is useless to cry "persecution of The old rite of the Mass!». Because if we want the limit to be objective, and first of all apply criteria aequitas together with the sense of proportion, we could reasonably say that, before dropping the ax on the Franciscans poor, They were hit hard by the Jesuits and with them several other historical orders and congregations with much more serious domestic problems, but mainly responsible for spreading for decades in a dangerous way - as in the case of the Jesuits -, a patently non-Catholic thought; this thing which, the Franciscans of the Immaculate, They can not instead be accused. If in fact they were wrong, they did it in total good faith and right to preserve the deposit of the Catholic faith, undoubtedly animated by the best intentions inner and outer, by love for truth and authentic veneration of the Holy Church of Christ.

.

What for Humanae Vitae the Roman Pontiff He could not use the solemn dogmatic formula of definition - which is refusing that fact outside the communion of the Church, while discussing or disagreeing on a final ruling which also implies the infallibility, not instead out of the Communion of the Church - it was a very clear problem first of all to his Augusto extender, Blessed Pope Paul VI. Therefore, those theologians hard-core, not to mention the praticoni laity from blog to blog are suddenly dogmatic theologians, which today claim to the dogmatise Humanae Vitae and support it on dogmatic definitional elements which in fact do not exist, not only make disservice to this beautiful encyclical, but put into serious question the theological and doctrinal abilities of those who wrote it and then donated to the Church, showing above all not even know how to distinguish the very different degrees which run between a pronouncement definitional and a pronouncement definitive. And this encyclical, the Church, It has moreover been donated by a Pope Beato that is going to be canonized, then proclaimed shortly Santo. Therefore, if according to the so-called progressive on the one hand, for so-called traditionalists on the other hand, Blessed Pope Paul VI had wrong to ban contraception, or rather she had been wrong not “armor” this prohibition with the solemn dogmatic formula definitional, in which case it would be good that they supplicassero the reigning Pontiff to intervene as soon as possible to block his trial at the Congregation for the Causes of Saints. Unless the ultra liberals, the same as the poor Pope Paul VI made a so-called living hell on earth, They do not want to canonize for the third time, under the pretext of a Holy Pontiff, the season of the post-conciliar and their staff Council egomenico. And, said this, I stop, always not to open another theme into the already complex issue …

.

If the rules imposing the ban on the use of contraceptive methods It does not support and can not support themselves on dogma, But it can support one of many other passages of the Holy Gospels, from the following:

.

"Enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad the way that leads to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:; How narrow is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and few there be that find!» [Mt 7, 13-14].

.

Starting from this Gospel passage, I would like to convey to you and explain why today, even more than fifty years ago, When in 1968 it was promulgated, the Humanae Vitae It encloses an internal current message, prophetic and as such to follow. The key to understanding the Humanae Vitae, is not in fact the spirit misogynistic or so-called obsession with the Catholic Church on sex and human sexuality: anything. The Humanae Vitae It exalts what is given and is made to love. And what is given and is made to love, not dirty, as I said once in a private lounge with a famous porn actor who was among the guests, replying to certain of his bizarre concepts imprinted on a false idea of ​​"sexual freedom", he did not relieve anything, starting from the first woman, treated in any pornographic film as an object of pleasure, often with all the contempt case. Because the figure of all privileged and most of all in attenzionata Humanae Vitae, it is the woman, I'm sorry you have not figured in the seventies of the twentieth century feminists, from their famous leader today particularly beloved in Vatican: the abortion and eutanasista impenitente Emma Bonino, that has always been in the good graces of the heretic Bose and nourished roped destroyers Jesuit flirting with the ultra-secularists. Or someone really thinks that the reigning Pontiff, first as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, then by Roman Pontiff, knew or knew who Mrs. Emma Bonino? No, did not know, but as I wrote above, not repeat it again I reiterate that at all, to respond, Christ was God in person telling Peter:

.

"In truth, I say to you: when you were younger, you used to dress yourself, and walked where you; but when you are old you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do not want ' [GV 21,18].

.

Since the speech would not even be long but encyclopaedic, I just limit myself to a few basic hints; and I do it by relating the content of the deeply prophetic Humanae Vitae with today's society, in which certain lifestyles, dall'ecologismo variants to naturism, from vegetarianism until the forms of fundamentalism vegan, touch an increasingly large number of people. Because if we want to take the Humanae Vitae and tell it to the man of the XXI century, We can not do it with the abstruse categories of certain misguided metaphysical philosophers, because it is first necessary to make themselves understood and to make themselves understood you need to use the language of modern man, also beating the hammer over his new idols and his new gods, all with constant references to his consistency. How can, indeed, people who have a natural lifestyle and Naturist, made of expensive bio-natural products, ready to spend absurd sums for four homeopathic pills rather than taking an antibiotic they say damaging and harmful, Then take birth control pills? Even an antibiotic because they say hurtful and harmful, it just takes one or more times, and only if necessary, while the contraceptive pill to be taken in a methodical and continuous, for years and years. And, as to hurt, We are we sure that such a prolonged use of birth control pills not hurt to take an antibiotic in case of need, but which both disrupts the new "I" of belonging to the new religion of naturism and the so-called alternative medicine? Come May, They omitted by many specialists and scientists to speak publicly that the seventies of the twentieth century to follow, at the time that the birth control pills were authentic and powerful hormonal bombs - is clear, only now they are harmless! —, the structure and configuration of the new generations of children born from the prolonged use of the pill by their mothers, It's changed, and it is certainly not changed for the better, compared to that of children born to women that the pill have not ever used instead? Those who are afraid of upsetting, with certain obvious speeches, these heroic specialists and scientists, Perhaps the huge turnover of large multinational pharmaceutical companies?

.

To follow below by those who speak of environmentalism, nature and naturalness, ready to spend on a piece of clothing ten times as long as non-woven synthetic fibers, as unnatural and potentially harmful to the human body. How can it put a rather natural to consider the rubber condom as a synthetic suit on the male member of the male during a very natural sexual intercourse? It's a track suit most harmful and unnatural made with synthetic fabrics, or a condom that comes between the man and the woman during the naturalness of love?

.

This is what they have not understood the great teologoni, indistinctly progressives or traditionalists. Why them, who love to talk about themselves, but not to lead to the arcane mysteries of faith, but why they start at themselves, They are discussing themselves and remain in themselves. And they, and those flying the nail on the re-read Humanae Vitae, and those who consider the ban on contraception a dogma of the Catholic faith, of this prophetic and far-sighted text they did not understand anything, although summed up in a nutshell with five words alone: Make love the way God. Because the teaching and ministry of the pilgrim Church on earth, It is not based, nor was it ever based on Freudian castration man, but far from the full release of a man called by God to use their sexuality to love, until reaching the culmination of love through the gift of life. And, only for this, Blessed Paul VI deserves to be canonised.

.

the Island of Patmos, 9 February 2018

.

.

DEAR READERS, PLEASE TAKE OUR VISION OF THIS TEXT, WHO

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanksgiving [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

AVAILABLE THE BOOK OF MASS DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS, WHO

.

.

.

About isoladipatmos

7 thoughts on "The issue of Humanae Vitae is simple: make love and do it well. Who establishes new dogmas is worse than those dogmas places them into question and then deconstructs them

  1. Caro father Ariel
    in one of twelve Marian apparitions officially approved, the same Blessed Virgin Mary asked – for now in vain – to be revered with the title of Coredemptrix. I therefore think that at least they can freely discuss.
    (I remember in passing that the woman clothed with the sun was seen for the first time by mortal eyes just Patmos…)

    1. Dear Andrea,

      please read what I wrote and not what I have written, because I'll explain and clarify what is one thing to discuss, one thing is for sure give a never proclaimed dogma, and act accordingly, as if it were a dogma of the Church.

      As for the debate, some of the finest threads of the history of the Church, They took place in Paris between the various theological schools in the fourteenth century, right around what is now the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, who it was proclaimed only about five centuries later by Blessed Pope Pius IX. And the discussions made at this point that lit the Blessed Duns Scotus, today it is known as the Immaculate Doctor, He was also accused of heresy by opposing theological schools.

      This is all part, of always, precious theological debate.

      What Our Lady's apparitions in Amsterdam, to which she refers, They have been recognized as authentic by the Church, it's a fact. The result, however, that in addition to the recognition of this fact, the Church has recognized as genuine all, but just how much all the words reported by the seer during his whole life?

      It informs in this sense, because recognizing a fact as true in no way implies recognition as authentic even all of the reported sighs from one to more seers.

      Or to clarify everything with another example: a Fatima, The Church, It recognized as a made appearances, and later he recognized as authentic ones also known as posts “the secrets of Fatima”.
      The late Servant of God Lucia Dos Santos, in the course of his long life, It is said to have also received other signs and inspirations from the Holy Virgin, on several of which is reported in the interview to the Diocese Bishop is subsequently in messages addressed to different Popes. To my knowledge, however, that any of those numerous messages have yet been approved as genuine revelations; yet, The Church, He has recognized the apparition of Fatima …

      sees, It declared if I did not believe that the resurrection of Christ, God came to us and that is a fact of history and physical, but rather that it is only a metaphor, thereby deny the prince foundation of the mystery of Revelation, because our faith is based entirely on the resurrection of Christ, as we learn from the Blessed Apostle Paul, It does not stand on private revelations. Therefore, to deny this central foundation of faith would make me a heretic and would exclude me from the communion of the Church.

      Otherwise instead, if I protestations not to believe all the supernatural revelations of a seer, I assure you that I could go to bed at night and sleep soundly in perfect communion with the Church.

  2. Dear Don Ariel,

    (1) in the list of deadly sins and consequent sins, it is obvious that the first is the arrogance of luciferin non Served. However always, and today especially with unprecedented virulence, lust in all its forms, is the weapon unleashed by the enemy to undermine all the work of the Creator, against the person, against the family, against civil society, against the Church. A single example: She strongly described the disaster as priests and bishops and cardinals, perhaps it not born in a very high percentage of the facts of lust, practiced or perhaps sometimes imagined ?

    (2) Some of the Franciscans will have obtained an opinionated, but what justifies haunt them all ? And especially, if their crimes were so serious, why no one has openly declared ? Because today it is impossible to know what ever they are accused, for being police with extinction aimed methods ?

    (3) In particular, and specifically, What can be said – but no one says – on the father Manelli, to justify the harsh and uncompromising detention and segregation imposed since the notorious thug Marcel M. Degollado ?

    1. Dear Reader,

      you are right around, in a logical and wise way.

      Obviously taking into account that certain complex subjects has always been forced to deal with one or more angles, because they do it all is impossible.

      Therefore, that human sexuality is not the center of the entire mystery of evil, it's obvious, but that through the lust many souls are driven by always towards Hell, it is equally true. Let me give just one example among many: we think of the extraordinary utility of the computer network and the Internet, with which we theologians and pastors in the care of souls can reach out and interact with many people and with much more ease past, He is doing so well also and above all. Well, I even though I work on the Internet for years and years, suffice it to say that my email goes back to the distant 1996, I took a long time to realize and understand that over 50% of materials moved to the network are content and pornographic and that any child or teenager, simply by typing in the search engine – I pass the word, but you must – “fucking” the “porn movies”, He'll end up in front pages and pages without any censorship, if his parents have failed to enter the appropriate blocks.

      The finally reassured that in the past, and also for several times, I severely criticized the severity with which he was treated the Father Stefano Maria Manelli, and also in my writing, as will be seen, I reiterated that before the commissariare the Franciscans were many other police stations, starting right from the Jesuits.

      As for the man of Satan Marcial Maciel, I am convinced as ever that in the future will be made public the serious responsibilities of many prelates in the coverage of this figure and this story went on for decades, while being ruined generations of students and irreparably deformed young in their vocational path; and it will be found that, behind these covers, there was a great round of money, in conclusion: la simonia.

      The Holy See was wrong, and it has seriously wrong, not to suppress the Congregation of the Legionaries of Christ, because from a rotten tree can not grow and develop healthy fruit. That is why, I repeat, many Christian, in a future perhaps not far, They will be indicated with ignominy before the history of the Church, remaining ascribed to it with ignominy.

  3. Don Ariel, I would make a note in what he writes about the “creation” New dogmas.
    I consider just the recalling to dogmatizza certain principles to be cautious and, if anything, let it do the Magisterium. However I find her very hard topics such, in my humble opinion, not to help a correct reflection.
    In the first place the example on masturbation. While understanding his reasons, that appeal more to a doctor to a priest, I have not read a single phrase of his that masturbation is a sin. That being said as you say so, It seems to be almost desirable to happen. I repeat: as I understand his reasons, But all human, If you open the Catechism, I can not find words you like her, but words like “intrinsically and gravely disordered action”. I guess I will quote the following paragraph 2352, where it reads that various factors can decrease the morale colpevolzza, one out of all the ignorance. But this, You know this, It is unlikely because we are in 2018. Perhaps to my grandmother's time, in the early '900 could be ignorant in matters of sexual morality. But one who has switched from a confessional, can still do not know?

    And if a guy goes from the confessional without a priest to tell him that something is a sin, would be good if that priest was suspended because incapable of doing his job.
    anyway, at the end, if those who confess knows that time that masturbation is a mortal sin, can no longer camp ignorance, does not find?

    For communion for divorced quite right ...: You can not put in the instance of the indissolubility of marriage. But the wonder: not enough that the divine lips have uttered a phrase very clear about, such that become untouchable, like a dogma?
    you can argue about condoms, on which Jesus was actually delivered. But divorce seems to me that we, although not formally, the 'right' divine.

    ultimately, the example of his disgraced former prof says everything and nothing. Says it all because we grieve the extreme inconsistency and hypocrisy. but it can not be erected to mitigate rule for other situations, such as the use of condoms or masturbation.

    otherwise, at the end, than it does the Staller, also go with sleeping with different women every night, doing it secretly is less and less ...

  4. Reverend Father Ariel,

    She writes

    "Prohibition of the use of contraceptives, as is the expression of the supreme magisterium supported on natural law and traditio catholica, it can not be, today and even tomorrow, supported on dogmatic elements such as recourse to a solemn ex cathedra pronouncement of the infallible magisterium ".

    But it then makes

    "This discipline sanctioned by Blessed Pope Paul VI is to be understood as set forth infallibly, provided that no theologian, more or less versed in precise doctrinal and moral matters, ends up confuse a pronouncement infallibility linked to the so-called second degree, etc. "

    So I ask: given that the legislation on contraception may not be dogmatized, to change this framework it would incur into heresy as it were denied a dogma, since it apparently falls under the infallibility of the second degree?

    In other words: It said that in some cases the use of contraception, not abortion would be morally licit, is heresy or not?

    Thank you in advance for your reply.

Leave a Reply