IPAZIA GATTA ROMANA RESPONDS TO ROBERTO DE MATTEI
click which to listen to the song dedicated to Hypatia by Alberto Sordi
Chiarissimo Professor Dr.. Roberto de Mattei.
The Priest Unnamed which "Christian charity" she is silent the name, we all know that is Stefano Levi Ariel Gualdo. Now, I being philosopher, I will try to answer with a certain logical consistency.
I have not been accused of writing in the newspaper The Gazette, anything, Reverend Unnamed has put a question that she has not escaped: has asked if there is a bad atheism, to Eugenio Scalfari, intellectual left; and a good one, to Giuliano Ferrara, intellectual right, the newspaper which have been repeatedly published your articles so-called "anti-bergogliani”, not only critical to the interview of the Holy Father.
The fact that she claims that "the interview of Pope Francesco be criticized for its content», is a statement that the door out of his job as a historian accustomed from time to use the instrument of history to arrive at conclusions theological and doctrinal disputes, which are entirely legitimate, but in turn questionable, especially if she assumed, as a devout Catholic, to be able to "censor" the Holy Father for what he does and says.
The items to which you refer, a partire da alcuni duri articoli sulla persona del Santo Padre firmati da Alessandro Gnocchi — al quale di recente il Reverendo Innominato ha dato dell’eretico [see which] - And by the late Mario Palmaro of blessed memory [see which], could not be published in Future because as you know this is the official newspaper of the Italian bishops. Or maybe just Levied Christian and Correspondence Romana may benefit from the right not to publish articles that rise up only indirectly relevant reservations on your friends Lefebvrians? Therefore, if you want to be logical and consistent, do not say that neither Future nor other Catholic papers would never published those your articles, when the first censoring is you, and to levels at which even the old Pravda would perhaps come.
The 'allegations' Cristina Siccardi are not "ungenerous", also because they are not accusations but critical. And here one might ask what is his criterion “scientific criticism”, since she is an academic longtime. Nobody has in fact attacked the delightful Lady but only his books and his ideas weird, under which she can be shown in full and deserved title as 'writer', because this is, But not with the adjective "catholic" as she calls it, because such is not. And who has challenged the ideas catholically incorrect Mrs. Siccardi, whether you like it or not, is in fact a respectable pastor in charge of souls and a theologian whose name she is silent for what he calls angrily "Christian charity". Now, if by chance she wanted to despise someone, do it well, Also this is his right, but does not invoke the "Christian charity", if the Catholic hard&Pure wants to play, because charity is not just a popular way to say, is very serious, because … Deus Caritas Est.
Reverend Unnamed is then a priest facing the people of God is vested with the grave responsibility that she and Mrs. Siccardi you have neither the grace of sacramental state nor for the sacred ministry, ie a moral obligation to tell the faithful what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, seriously pastoral, Reverend Unnamed invited the faithful Catholics who often live with understandable anxiety these moments of confusion get in and Extras ecclesial, not to seek answers and guidelines path in the lines of this delightful Lady, who clumsily abused the figure of Blessed Paul VI to legitimize the Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, impudently likened to St. Athanasius of Alexandria and presenting Paul VI as a figure through which to reach Lefebvre [see which]. Therefore, Mrs. Siccardi, against these his public statements on the historical weird, theological and ecclesiological, o è un’ignorante — nel senso etimologico del termine di ignorare — oppure è una mistificatrice della storia della Chiesa, because the Blessed Paul VI, about which she claims to own hands accurate research studies conducted [see which], in his letter to the 29 June 1975 Marcel Lefebvre made this clear and unequivocal statement:
You leave invoke the case in your favor of Athanasius. It is true that the great bishop stood virtually alone in defending the true faith, in the contradictions that came to him from all sides. More, precisely, it was the defense of the faith of the recent Council of Nicaea. The council was the standard that inspired his loyalty, as indeed in St. Ambrose. How could anyone today compare to St. Athanasius, by daring to fight a council as the second Vatican Council, that is not less authority, which is even greater in some aspects even than that of Nicaea?
"It is true that St. Athanasius remained practically the only one to defend the true faith, despite the opposition that came from all over. But it was precisely the faith of the recent Council of Nicaea. Today, how could anyone compare himself to St. Athanasius, daring to fight a Council as the Vatican, that is not less authoritative, which is in some respects even more important than that of Nicaea?». [full text of the letter of Blessed Paul VI, which]
Can a serious scholar circumvent this writing so clear of Blessed Paul VI, until completely ignore that just before it, a few years later, took note of the bitterly closed obstinacy of this bishop, St. John Paul II decided to impose excommunication, after he set up a schismatic act, this in fact is the consecration of four bishops without the mandate of the Apostolic? [see which].
Estimate now she erroneous and heretical scope of its arguments and writes the Siccardi, seminando in tal modo gravi errori tra quel Popolo di Dio verso il quale il Reverendo Innominato ha precise responsabilità e mandato — a lui conferito da un Vescovo in comunione col Vescovo di Roma — di annuncio e di salvaguardia della Verità Rivelata e del Magistero della Chiesa, she declares in fact:
"Monsignor Lefebvre was a knight without fear and without reproach with a force that was definitely not human, he acted like he could act during a Sant'Atanasio Arianism, acted as a St. Catherine of Siena, which alone has faced the Popes […] this is when Monsignor Lefebvre becomes the champion of the most important things, of the most essential, that is, a champion of faith, in the sense that defending Mass defends the faith itself […] Monsignor Lefebvre acted so much love for Jesus Christ and then for the Church and for the Pope […] Ecône was a place where you really can defend itself by bombing liberal, Modernist, relativists and where it was possible to keep the Tradition " [see which, from minutes 12,10 to follow].
The fact that Cardinal Raymond Burke Leonard has written a foreword to a book of this author, is neither a guarantee nor a license legitimacy of its contents, also because, if you like c'insegnate is legitimate to criticize at every turn the work of the popes who have succeeded by 1958 a oggi e quindi l’autorità ed i documenti di un intero concilio ecumenico — cosa nella quale siete ormai da tempo specializzati attraverso libri, conferences and journalistic activities - more so wonder: you can if necessary criticize the choices more or less appropriate for a single cardinal, deposed by the Roman Pontiff by the Presidency of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, just to be nominated 66 years chaplain of the Knights of the Order of Malta?
As for Mrs. Maria Guarini, whose kindness and commitment no one has ever raised any question, the fact that the Brunero Gherardini has called "a woman of faith and science", is not a guarantee, Although the Lady a woman of undoubted faith and a scholar who seeks to learn science. Indeed, when the Lady appeared long ago to Reverend Innomitato the draft of his book on liturgical themes, he was startled to find in it in a whole series of errors of historical and theological, combined with a precarious knowledge of dogmatic sacramental, finally crowned by a generous foreword by Brunero Gherardini. This is the reason why the Reverend Unnamed not agreed to publish the book in the series theological directed by him: to avoid an eminent elder brother of the caliber of Brunero Gherardini yet another poor showing to be delivered to the history, so evident were certain errors of Guarini as inappropriate before them the preface of Gherardini.
We are pleased, Professor clear, that you manage to keep up foundations, news agencies, magazines, sites, publications of books for a fee, organization of conferences, gears for the life and so on, all with subscriptions and sacrifice of so many faithful friends who collaborate with you. Therefore, if instead declare offended by certain "slanderous attacks" that these are not, Christian charity had to teach to us how to collect considerable sums of money to prop up our activities for the good of the Church founded by Christ on Peter, we would be grateful to be now and forever, ensuring a special memory for her and the Lepanto Foundation during a Mass celebrated for you - with the penalty vetus ordo — on the feast of the Chair of St. Peter.
Dr. Paul Deotto, Director of Levied Christian, referring also to Reverend Unnamed, took the opportunity to make an allusion to the results of the Law Basaglia that left many loose those with problems after the closure of mental hospitals [see full article which]. Dr. Deotto, with his prudish weather democristianese basato sul dire e non dire — lessico e stile ormai morto agli albori degli anni Settanta −, seems very sensitive to certain political and social problems, so we would like to invite him to evaluate another drama, on which could write some pearl of wisdom: Italy is a country increasingly old and with a number of older problematic always higher, Unfortunately, many of which remain cut off from the departments of geriatrics for lack of places available, which is partly a human drama, partly an emergency that demands further investigation.