The Synod Pantedesco hidden behind the Synod Panamazzonico: that old desire to give his wife the priests in a superb blind and visible Church does not want to learn from the mistakes of history and from others' mistakes

- ecclesial news -

THE SYNOD PANTEDESCO CONCEALED BEHIND THE SYNOD PANAMAZZONICO: THAT OLD WIFE WANTS TO GIVE TO PRIESTS, SUPERB IN A CHURCH VISIBLE AND BLIND THAT DOES NOT WANT TO LEARN FROM MISTAKES OF HISTORY AND FROM MISTAKES OF OTHERS

.

In short: You can be so wicked to use as an excuse the Amazon to celebrate a synod whose sole purpose is to carry out yet another coup d'etat of that fringe of German episcopate that Catholic, at this point, in name only? The thing is in fact to such an obvious point in its overt shamelessness, that there are only two solutions: or we are dealing with naive, or - God forbid! - with authentic delinquents. Because who really is not clear remember that this is not the Synod Panamazzonico, but nothing more than that the Synod Pantedesco, using as a pretext the Amazon and the reassuring formula to experiment, He wants to give yet another blow to the entire universal Church.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

.

the dictator of North Korea Kim Jong

In late 2019 and early 2020 There will be two major events: from the 6 al 27 October 2019 the Synod Panamazzonico, from the 21 al 26 February Carnival of Rio de Janeiro. Considering that in Brazil the religious syncretism is unofficially recognized, one might expect a summary of union between these two events.

.

Regarding use that for some years has run started making synods, the question already put him in my article published in October 2018, wonder where:

.

"If in fact the Court of Miracles, as I call it, or the Magic Circle, as Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller calls it instead, He has already prepared an agenda with a whole range of issues already established, but above all, and in fact already approved, because convene synods? Perhaps to give the semblance of collegiality in the same way in which the young dictator of North Korea, Kim Jong, He wants to give a semblance of parliamentary democracy? And what happened to the Korean dissidents, They are perhaps finished tied on missile warheads, then launched below for the experimental tests?» [cf. see article, WHO].

.

If we can easily assume the end that made the dissidents in North Korea, less easily we can imagine one reserved for dissidents inside the Church. Anyhow, what changes are only the forms, because the substance is that: North Korean dissidents were executed, in today's visible Church, dissidents are be merciful. In North Korea, any form of peaceful dissent is branded as an action carried out by the enemies subservient to the liberal-capitalist power; in the visible Church, any form of peaceful dissent is stamped from Magic Circle, O Court of Miracles, as "hostility of the enemies of the new direction of the Church", all through the trumpets of a deployed journalism that has given up since time immemorial to the truth.

.

The Synod Panamazzonico - through which the equivalent clerical-parliament of North Korea seems determined to clear the priesthood to married men -, it is played all about this: on the almost total historical falsification and on the emotion that does not reason, why not learn from past mistakes, but lives a present-blind, no future perspective, where what counts is the only all at once. Only with these clear introduction, we could talk about the phenomenon of syncretism that will give rise to a dangerous combination of this Synod and the Carnival of Rio de Janeiro.

.

If North Korea parliament takes to give effect to the states and wants to Kim Jong, in the visible Church synods now serve to give effect to the states and wants our Kim Jong. But, also in this case, the difference is still a substantial time: while we all know that Korea is ruled by Kim Jong imposing their own decisions, as we are concerned we know yes, Who governs the universal Catholic Church, But we do not know who he is or who the various Kim Jong impose their decisions, making use of synods in the same way this young dictator uses the Korean Parliament.

.

Take for example the last Synod on the Family: between 5 and the 19 October of 2014 He held a general meeting to discuss the "pastoral challenges on the family in the context of evangelization", all to gather testimonies and proposals. From the 4 al 25 October of 2015 It takes place the ordinary Synod focused on "The vocation and mission of the family in the Church and in the contemporary world", purpose of which it was to look for and then trace new pastoral models of the person and the family. After that, the 19 March 2016, It has published the Apostolic Exhortation post-synodal love joy.

.

When between 2014 and the 2015 he began to feel toward what some sections aimed episcopate through its representatives at the Synod, It has not been slow to attend to real raised shields, but mainly he decided opposition on the part of representatives of other and far more fringes majority of episcopate. After that, between 2015 and the 2016, in the Church in dialogue, open, welcoming and inclusive, if witnessed several missile launches, on the heads of which had been bound - so much fraternal how merciful -, men of deep and solid doctrine as the late Cardinal Carlo Caffara and Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, while on the missile launch stood out from top to bottom the inscription: mercy.

.

In this regard written on missiles and bombs worth mentioning that during the Second World War, when the mighty Allies on planes loaded the bombs to drop on Europe's cities to destroy lives of defenseless civilians together with the priceless art works, good soldiers liberators wrote various dedications on bombs, usually ironic tributes to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, for example, when needlessly they razed to the ground and Dresdren Munich in February 1945, because Germany was already defeated, it was unnecessary to decimate the populations of these two cities and destroying historical and artistic treasures of inestimable value. As it was not necessary that the British officers linked by affiliation to the Masonic lodges more maddeningly anti-Catholic Britain destroy the Abbey of Montecassino, which it was not rebuilt with the money of Americans, who offered contributions yes, but on condition, however, that lied Cassinese Archabbot declaring that within the perimeter of the great monastery were German troops. The Archabbot he refused to entrust to a false history, like this, the historic abbey, yes it was rebuilt, but with the money of the Government of the Italian Republic, just to be clear.

.

When, after the massive bombing Synod the Church will be rebuilt, the grace of God put in our way a fair and honest man who will deny to entrust the story a lie, just as he did the Archabbot Cassinese; and the Church will be rebuilt over the rubble with the money of the faithful, namely with the authentic faith of believers.

.

After the Synod on the Family, including bombings and missiles that fell their way above the word "mercy" and "tenderness", He went is forming a very weak episcopate, because the date of the 2013 the average age of bishops around the world was quite high and over the past six years have been renewed with hundreds of nominations bishops of many dioceses of the world.

.

A day after its publication, the short, concisely and dramatically Cardinal Walter document on Brandmuller An instrument of labor panamazzonico the Synod has passed completely unnoticed [see text, WHO]. Compact more than ever, the so-called "official media" has been silent. A silence that is reminiscent of the Communist press and the major parties and circles linked to it, when in 1968 Russian tanks invaded Prague City, after the liberation movements of the so-called Prague Spring. And this is an unusual silence, least deafening, because the senior Cardinal, considered one of the greatest historians of the Church and ecclesiologists currently living, He has not moved simple and ordinary critical, but he explained that the text contains the heresies that constitute an act of apostasy from the Catholic faith. Needless to comment on everything, just take the text and read by Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, because anyone who does not consider the theology of emotion, a subjective feeling and a poem, He can not but agree with him: that text is an incitement to apostasy from the Catholic faith.

.

Now a question arises to say the least legitimate: why send out a lucid and determined Cardinal nonagenarian? I understand that no cardinal elector like to run the risk of decay by this law even before the completion of the 80th year of age; I understand that diocesan bishops do not like to run the risk of being removed from their episcopal chairs. To follow with an army of priests who do not want to run the risk of being removed from their pastoral duties, to follow with all those committed laity within the church structures as with the Church do not just keep the family, but with it are enriched, up to be this still more fearful of ecclesiastical same.

.

Some time ago I tried to explain it all with the tragic - but I think realistic - image “Nuremberg Trials” [see article WHO]. For some time I am afraid that we have to deal with an army of cardinals, bishops and priests who think tomorrow to overcome the great examination of God's judgment affirming a clear conscience, like the Nazi leaders, to have only obeyed orders from above. Assuming that they should believe a truth of faith that God's judgment will be immediate after our death, Universal then the end of time, when Christ will return in glory to judge the living and the dead.

.

The proven fact, painful and realistic, as sometimes is very painful reality, now it should shine in the sunlight, only exception made for those who choose not to see the sun shining in the sky: participate in the synods of bishops it means to be extras in a classical tragedy, or a farce of the Italian cinema of the Seventies, where the three or four major players which support the entire script need a number of extras. In this kind of theatrical or filmic, extras have a single utility: emphasize the main actors. Whether the young Vittorio Gassman who plays for two hours Prometheus Aeschylus to head down in the greek theater in Syracuse, or it is the no less great Alberto Sordi in the satirical film smart Holidays, The principle underlying everything is the same. Said this: can, extras or set, any influence? No, because their role is silent and limited to a pure presence, aimed in one way or another to bring out the actor or the two or three main actors.

.

We have long understood that the Synods They serve to bring out a pastoralism now become "wild pastoralism", and along with it the so-called conciliarism that since the season of the post-council has lost every kind of relationship, even distantly, with the Second Vatican Council. And the operation, going on for years, Today is even more evident, but decidedly cheeky: the doctrine is untouchable, But, while leaving unaltered the doctrine, it changes the pastoral practice. Or to clarify everything with an example: the body of the Ferrari remains as such, nobody touches it and editing, But, from its interior, It takes off the engine and replaced it with that of the new Fiat 500. Then, if someone will raise protests, It will respond that the body of the Ferrari remained undiluted. Obviously there is a question before this all should be asking: but a Ferrari, It exists as such for its bodywork, or for the engine which encloses inside? And before this clear operation, indeed shameless, those who remain behind the scenes, and sends out to raise questions a Cardinal nonagenarian, He will have to answer really, but above all very seriously before God.

.

The Synod Panamazzonico It will serve to clear somehow married clergy. Perhaps, in this increasingly disturbing absence of historical memory, few remember that the main actor of this Synod, German-Brazilian Cardinal Cláudio Hummes, liked and named prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy by Pope Benedict XVI in 2006, just arrived in Rome declared that celibacy is an ecclesiastical discipline, not a dogma of the Catholic faith. What real, indeed obvious. But since everything was expressed in a certain way, ie in the typical ambiguous way these people, the international press is ingenerarono numerous debates. Like this, a few days after, the same prefect clarified and belied, giving implicit blame the journalists need to always launch titles on the Effect Press [see WHO]. In any case, the message had been launched, Cardinal Cláudio Hummes just had to wait another seven years, and then be able to say to the new elected to the holy throne in 2013: "I'll never forget the poor!» [cf. video WHO]. So act accordingly, with all the confidence and the benefits that already the Cardinals Orsini families, Colonna and Farnese recognized its loyal voters in conclave. All with respect to those who never misses an opportunity to disparage Roma, its history and its characters, But unless such a deal in facts which, if not worse. Indeed, the Orsini, the Farnese and the Colonna, Rome loved her, just look at how they have enriched of the priceless art works, They have certainly not turned the Bernini colonnade in dormitory for homeless, surroundings of San Pietro in an open and historic churches in taverns urinal to heaven handled by radical chic the Community of Sant'Egidio [cf. See previous articles, WHO, WHO].

.

Cardinal Cláudio Hummes and other associates, They had the really admirable patience to wait years. Similarly in which the modernists have had the patience to have been waiting for decades, Meanwhile working subtly and noticed. Finally, coupling the right time, with the excuse of the Amazon Region, Sorting out here is packaged beautifully the idea of sources try: men married adults chosen and consecrated priests to areas where there is a lot of shortage of clergy. And as, certain radical break with the ancient tradition of the Church, in which celibacy has its roots from the first apostolic era, You are mitigated as much as possible, here is served reassurance quiet ...: the whole, solo to experiment!

.

The last exhibition Church history teach in a comprehensive way what happens when we start with the concept to experiment, just take the sacred liturgy in which, who half a century ago they were considered serious abuses, today are not only intangible elements, but many considered indisputable much more fundamental truths of the faith. Indeed, to try to heal the serious abuses, He resorted to concessions to experiment so that, those same abuses, they were correct. Instead, those same abuses, They are finished dogmatizzati. Just one example among many: the abuse of the reception of Communion on the hands, to which I would refer you all’opera of my brother canon lawyer and historian, Federico Bortoli [see video WHO] who in his book explains and clarifies how it all arises from an abuse and how it is not true that this way of receiving the Holy Eucharist was the practice in the early Church [cf. Board book, WHO].

.

If this synod, with its main actors and its silent extras, establish all to experiment for the Rio the Amazon Region, soon this experiment It will be extended to Germany, to France, All'Olanda, Belgium So ..., as in the past for various other kinds of abuse, again we find ourselves in such a situation: you can climb on the chair of a pontifical universities and allegorical element defined as the resurrection of Christ and his ascension to heaven, but it will not be possible to discuss the disastrous inappropriateness of having given birth to a married clergy, so that in fact would be disastrous intended to subvert radically the same pastoral structure of the Church.

.

Why would a married clergy is to be avoided? If theologians and ecclesiologists the para-council, from which came the post-conciliar, they were honest, should remember that the schismatic Orthodox schismatics both Anglicans, invited along with other Christian communions separated from the Catholic communion as observers at the Council, when some experts only touched this topic, in response, and especially the Orthodox, I replicarono: "You who have priestly celibacy, hold it and keep it ". Then they proceeded to explain, those who wished to remake the Catholic Church through radical transformations, what it meant for them, as bishops of the autocephalous churches, having to manage, with serious problems, married clergy. Anglicans did this instead: "If you gave life to married clergy, you end up like us have to do with ecclesiastical accounts that will have as its first priority the care of their families and the growth and arrangement of their children, dedicating communities a limited time at Sunday services of worship. Then, If the family of a priest there were problems, everything will impact negatively on the community and the faithful he should treat and care ». No one remembers precisely these speeches and exhortations, occurred during the celebration of what some call as the great council of the entire history of the Church? Evidently, even by so-called "separated brethren", You tend to take only what you want, operating at times real manipulations of reality. Indeed, the lessons of their experiences and what they told us during the assizes of Vatican II, was implemented so that half a century later, someone, It even decided to set up a study committee to evaluate the possibility of some form of women deacons, all while the restored permanent diaconate sources try It is in fact already failed, and it became in many regions of the world, from the same Diocese of Rome, a privilege and hegemony of para-Catholic sect of the Neocatechumenal. Just so: in many dioceses you are unable to become permanent deacons if you are not part of the sect of the Neocatechumenal, who run this ministry reproducing each other.

.

Anglicans and Protestants, with the establishment of "women priests" and "women bishops" have further fractured. E, despite being in deep crisis and a real haemorrhage of faithful being the Sixties, found with these liberal feminists they have only lost more faithful. Why not say how many were Anglicans after the establishment of "women priests" and "women bishops" entered the Catholic Church? Or maybe we forget that the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI published for that purpose in 2009 the apostolic letter groups of Anglicans [cf. WHO] to dictate the necessary regulations useful to the return of Anglicans, More and more, They asked to be admitted to Catholic communion, after the carnival liberal-feminist of women priests and women bishops?

.

Anglicans who asked to join the Catholic communion, by such reasons were pushed? Perhaps for reasons that were not explained well and on time by Cardinal Walter Kasper to the reigning Pontiff, before His Holiness departed for Lund where in 2017, right in the centenary of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, he went to embrace a masked woman archbishop during the celebrations of the five hundred years of pseudo-reforms of Martin Luther, that far from being this - that a reform - was a dramatic schism, with all the worst religious consequences, theological and finally policies.

.

Instead of a theological speech, to all those secularists who do not even know the prayers of Our father, that they are distant from the ecclesial and sacramental life, but that much press to give his wife and children to the priests, I want to make a very practical discourse, from a question: the maintenance of these households, perhaps intending to provide their? Because maybe it should clarify that the universal Catholic Church is not the opulent and rich Church catholic-protestant German, than with the church tax - the cult tax - comes to rake in around ten billion euro, in addition to all properties and holdings in corporate and bank holdings which it enjoys. In Germany, are also salaried catechists and members of pastoral councils of the parishes, much to be understood. The universal Catholic Church, But it is not the whole a greater Germany: in many parts of the world there are priests who have to work in order to sustain. For instance, in various regions of Latin America we can find priests of various areas - that I have known -, engaged in various jobs or small businesses: the pastor who raises chickens and sells eggs, the pastor who cultivates the land of parish property and sells vegetables at the fruit market. There is the pastor who has purchased, or she had the gift of four or five cows and selling milk, the priest who makes private lessons to students, one who works as a translator and so on. In these contexts, the lucky priests - but they are indeed a few - are those that have managed to have a place like teachers in schools, after obtaining, in addition to the ecclesiastical degrees, Also of civil degrees in various disciplines. then place the universal Catholic Church is not a big, opulent and rich Germany, to priests who already live in these conditions and to sustain themselves and exercise their sacred ministry must try to make ends meet, we might also give the burden of a family, but especially children to grow and maintain?

.

Obviously, I'm not invited to the Synod, I am a priest faithful to the doctrine and teaching of the Church, I am neither a heretic as Enzo Bianchi nor are by means of direct pace&love that thrives on surrealism, while its reduced congregation to a handful of four old contentious, thank God you are dying out. But, I was a participant in the Synod, Taking apart altogether from theologically, ecclesiological and even pastoral, I would place a very practical question, also focusing their feet and beating their fists on the table so that I have an answer. Why this church now visible specializing in non-answers or the answers of all processed, a clear answer esigerei: but families, and in particular children, to the priests, Who keeps them to him? I would add a second question: in very sensitive cultural contexts such as those of some African countries and India, where they are always strong certain ancient traditions, If we want to create, the style of the old tribal chiefs or that of Brahmins, a priestly caste that would ultimately transmitted and handed down from father to son, after becoming the prerogative of certain groups and families?

.

In short: You can be so wicked to use as an excuse the Amazon to celebrate a synod whose sole purpose is to carry out yet another coup d'etat of that fringe of German episcopate that Catholic, at this point, in name only? The thing is in fact to such an obvious point in its overt shamelessness, that there are only two solutions: or we are dealing with naive, or - God forbid! - with authentic delinquents. Because who really is not clear remember that this is not the Synod Panamazzonico, but nothing more than that the Synod Pantedesco, using as a pretext the Amazon and the reassuring formula to experiment, He wants to give yet another blow to the entire universal Church.

.

At these very concrete questions, nobody will answer, because starting from Cardinal Cláudio Hummes, to follow the Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisserri, These characters live in the unreal world. E, as unfortunately we know, in the unreal world have the best ideologies, or those that the Blessed Apostle Paul called fairy tales for which, and in whose name, they turn away from the truth [cf. II Tm 4, 1-5] while falls pride on our eyes a veil that prevents us from seeing:

.

"But their minds were blinded:; indeed, until today, when they read the old covenant, the same veil remains, without being removed, because it is in Christ that it is abolished. But until today, when Moses is read, a veil lies on their heart; But when it turns to the Lord, the veil is taken ' [II Cor 3, 14-16].

.

They converted to the Lord, here's the thing. Unfortunately, for now, however, are proving to have instead converted to the Prince of this world, that made them blind and then terribly harmful.

.

the Island of Patmos, 3 July 2019

.

.

The first book of the Editions The island of Patmos, visit our shop page WHO

 

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:









or you can use the bank account:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]





9 replies
  1. A bishop in Brazil
    A bishop in Brazil says:

    Don Ariel, I am a bishop in Brazil. A small diocese that maintains the true faith. I can not do anything else… But we will remain faithful to the end. Thank you for helping us this.

    • father ariel
      He answers the Author of the Book says:

      Sir Bishop,

      I am very grateful for your message, I desire to augur all the grace of God for his precious episcopal ministry.

      Ariel S. Levi de Gualdo

  2. The word he fears
    The word he fears says:

    (Dante, Inf.XXVII) Guido da Montefeltro had Trusted El Papa pro-tempore, but had not thought that El Diablo “loico was”.

  3. Nicola Ischia
    Nicola Ischia says:

    Dear Father Ariel,
    what regrets? At this point, after 6 years have pulled down all the important things and wants priestly celibacy does not face the same fate? After being defined “a gift for the Church” by the one who calls “vescovo di Roma” It is certainly intended to be undermined. Officially, the principles are solemnly affirmed, subverted in practice. Do not use the atomic bomb, just a few moves: not kneel before the Eucharist and you do before men (Sudanese migrants or political) and you destroyed Christology.

    Lodi Bonino or allows a Pannella praises straw monsignor? Ennobles abortion and homosexuality. Just a little note in a chapter of Letizia love and destroy the indissolubility of marriage.

    Now I expect that someone claims that the area of ​​the Holy Sepulcher was not see-supervised.

    After the stunt of a cardinaletto It is a fool who pays the sevices.

    Only two commandments have not touched: the 9th because most of them women they never desired, and the last because the real dictators aspire to power and fuck it the property of others.

    I feel like Pinocchio in the country of donkeys …

  4. Mary Magdalene
    Mary Magdalene says:

    I fear that the abolition of priestly celibacy is not really the only goal.
    I have read dozens of books spawned by evil minds who spread doctrines new age and similar devilry. Compared to these texts, they hide their poison administering it very well hidden in the middle of scientific assertions and good ideas and sharable, I have the impression, from the little I've read the document, which in this case has not been made any effort to conceal the naturalistic-masonic matrix of a substantially anti-Christic thought.

    I believe that the problems associated with the current “management” Human of the Church of Christ are punishable by merely Supernatural resolution. So these must be the weapons to be used to fight the battle against the forces of evil in the Church: Certainly the Rosary but, along with this, there is urgent need to promote Eucharistic Adoration. On your knees, come è giusto che sia. Do not feel the need to stay a while’ kneeling before Jesus in the Eucharist is evil in itself.

    If we do not put on their knees before the Eucharist, before those who kneel?

  5. Roman
    Roman says:

    Dear Father Ariel.

    Praised be Jesus Christ.

    I always read with great pleasure that you, ed i suoi collaboratori, scrivono. Then, I apologize for my Italian: 15 year absence from Italy does not give a good result in fluency.

    I am a Catholic Byzantine priest, Work in Siberia (Russia), I am the parish priest of the Byzantine and Latin Catholic communities.

    Allow me to two thoughts; I see no disaster if the priests are married, officially. Me and my wife went to Siberia, from St. Petersburg, because from there they fled religious. We, preti sposati, more often we go there, if not all religious they want to go. With all due respect, obviously.

    I do not know, maybe it's not so bad? Even the apostles were married and managed to bring back the Church.
    For example now, They come in Italy, Finally (Italy, quo vadis?, but it is a’ another matter), and I celebrate Holy Mass in Latin rite, that Byzantine. Yet they are, I repeat, married.

    However, reverend father, receive my warmest thanks for his work on the internet.

    I ask you to remember me in his prayers…

    • Fabrizio Giudici
      Fabrizio Giudici says:

      Some apostles were married, but left their families after the call of Christ.

    • father ariel
      Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo says:

      Always praise!

      Venerable Brother,

      how to understand the speech is very complex, especially when we face issues of the Catholic Church of East and West, not surprisingly we, for the one and for the other, two different rights: the Roman Canon Law and Canon Law of the Eastern Churches. We also have two different rites, and so on …

      On one thing we can agree, because it is a historical fact contained in the revelation: the Apostles, to follow Christ, not only they left their fishing nets, ie their businesses, but also their families. The apostles who were not married, They have never married. That's why we can say that celibacy, which it is not a dogma of faith but an ecclesiastical discipline, however it sinks its roots in the first apostolic times.

      You know also very well, for your ministry and to have lived in certain regions of the world, that the discussion would be very complex at the level above the historical, indeed, the small part, always very minority, of married Catholic priests we, They belong to ancient Churches – some of which also of apostolic foundation – that after the schism of 1054 They remained with the Church of the East. Then several of them asked him to return to communion with Rome, that recognized the privilege of having, in their own right and in their ritual, both celibate priests that married priests. And as always it happens among the Orthodox, married priests, however, could not rise to the episcopate.

      All this was repeated in 2009 with the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI through the Apostolic Letter groups of Anglicans.
      Anglicans, as by certain Catholic theologians are called clumsy “church”, together with the various Protestant denominations, also calls awkwardly “churches”, I am not at a church, after Luther, Zwingli and Calvin they started to rewrite the Sacraments, abolishing those which they say were political inventions of Catholicism. So they do not have the priesthood.

      That the orders made in the Anglican Communion are not valid because they lack apostolic succession, it sanctioned the Supreme Pontiff Leo XIII.

      Anyhow, as it happened in the past for several times, Benedict XVI, welcoming Anglicans into their communities had ranks of priests, first of all, It has provided that these receive an authentic and valid priestly ordination in the Catholic Church, then let it remain married men, granting them the sacred priestly order, vero e cattolico, as married men.

      Quite different from the Anglican and Protestant communities the talk of the Orthodox Church.
      The Orthodox are schismatics, and internally maintain many doctrinal errors, but they are a church and enjoy apostolic succession, therefore their priests are priests but schismatics, their schismatic bishops but priests, and their sacraments “illegal” but valid.

      You will know also know that for centuries, married priests belonging to the Eastern Rite, They could not exercise the ministry in the territory of the diocese of the Latin Rite, all the wise avoid confusion among the People of God, ie the People of God that today we try to be confused in any way.
      Like this, if married priests “Uniate”, Catholics of the current Ukraine, They were in territories and diocese of the Latin Rite, They could not celebrate Mass and administer the sacraments.

      Today we are going to create the dress rehearsal married clergy, the first who welcomed in Perugia two Eastern Rite priests are married and have family it was the Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, Archbishop of Perugia, which is among other things the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference.

      You and I both know you think about married clergy as a solution to the crisis of priestly vocations, It is really a lie knowing even to lie, because both the Orthodox, either all the various Christian denominations who have married ministers, have much more vocational crisis than we have now we Catholics held for stag.

      And never mind the absurd speech that the married clergy would be a deterrent to the scourge of pedophilia, that has always invested a small minority of priests and very small, unless you face the really dirty game called pedophiles who are alone and nothing but gay, who they have sex with their young extensively post-pubertal, so it's no ordinary homosexuality and pedophilia.

      If we go at large airports of civilized Germany, that very country that Italians do not lose opportunities to bestow civilization lessons, we will discover that it holds the world record of pedophile practitioners; We are going to see and discover in them not so much men single, but an army of pedophiles that are “good” fathers of families that start with flights charter to go for the weekend in Thailand-based boys and girls; and that you, which it is child abuse!

      In short: I think – but my thinking leaving all the time that finds – that in this time of crisis and confusion, give birth to a married Catholic clergy, It could only add to the confusion and bewilderment of the faithful.

      I implore the grace of the Lord upon you, your family and your sacred ministry.

Comments are closed.