Once upon a time the Eucharist and the Catholic priesthood, Then came Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez founders of the Neocatechumenal Way … and heresy became flesh and dwelt among us 28 March 20196 April 2019 isoladipatmos - the Theologica essays - THERE WERE ONCE THE EUCHARIST AND THE CATHOLIC PRIESTHOOD, THEN CAME Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez FOUNDERS OF Neocatechumenal Way ... HERESY AND BECAME FLESH AND CAME TO LIVING AMONG US . INDEX: The. Heresy is not an indecent word and give the heretic who falls and remains in material and formal heresy is not an insult, but a simple statement of fact - (II). The first misconception to dispel: if the Neocatechumenal Way was developed under the pontificates of two Popes Saints, This makes the case for holy and untouchable dogma of Catholic faith;? — III. The Neocatechumenal come to life on the crisis of the Church's authority and are developed under Pope John Paul II after having presented the family of The Mulino Bianco - IV. The Neocatechumenal Way has made current again the old heresy of the Cathars, without the ecclesiastical authorities would put brake to the fact that the Eucharist is not a private good of which they can dispose at will - The. When the Church is all the excuse not to listen to various kinds of victims, eventually he ends up being left with the Cardinals to the bars of the criminal courts, but even then followed with impunity to not listen - WE. The Lie of the Neucatecumenale Way leaders: affirm that the Church has recognized and fully legitimized their liturgical and catechetical antics - VII. To make it healthy enough movement the many good people who form it? They are enough testimonies of those who say: "The Way I converted", "The Way I returned to the Church"? VIII. The reigning Pontiff has been quick to launch also specific references to kikos and the mega-catechists of the Neocatechumenal obtaining the effect obtained by its three predecessors: on deaf ears - IX. The Neocatechumenal are the negation of the wise missionary spirit of the Church, and instead of bringing more people to Catholicism make new followers to Neocatecumenalesimo - X. The Neocatechumenal Way is a psycho-sect in which you cancel the critical sense after having invaded the consciousness of adepts and changing the crass ignorance and pride in the gift of the Holy Spirit election - XI. At the grave problem of misperception of the Holy Eucharist it is joining the wrong perception of the Priesthood, especially between the common priesthood of the baptized and the ministerial priesthood of Christ, which involves only the Ministers in sacris equipped with a office triple: teaching, governing, sanctificandi - XII. Conclusion. . . PDF of the essay in print . . Author:Ariel S. Levi Gualdo Before you get going in the long speech it is necessary to clarify the meaning of the word heresy. The need for clarification is due to the fact that within the Church itself has been undermined by time Newspeak, And it came to explain how years ago in one of the first items on this our Patmos Island [2014, see WHO], and then follow in my so-called keynote [see video, WHO]. Newspeak is not just create new words, or called neologisms, but perform an operation even worse: giving the words a meaning different from that etymologically have ch'esse. The emptying of the words from their meaning filled with completely different meanings, is a grave danger that the phenomenon takes development before, during and after the French Revolution. An exhaustive example is the concepts of freedom, equality and fraternity, which they are suffixes of the founding of Christianity, not an invention of the French Revolution. Principles, however,, the late eighteenth century, and following the course of the nineteenth century, They will change into principles antithetical to Christianity, what's more used to attack and groped scuttle of Christianity itself. . Repeatedly, in my many writings, I expressed deep concern how certain words, inside the church, we have assumed a negative connotation. Some examples: it is not uncommon to hear clergymen suffering from gross ignorance and theologians made more ignorant still on their pride, they use words such as "dogma" and "dogmatic", "Tridentine" or "tradition", even for offending your hosts: "... do not listen to him, It has an old mindset Tridentine ", "How much are you dogmatically!», "Ah, all these old dogmas!». Then comes the interior disregard legal and canonical system that regulates - or at least once regulated - the life of that societas which it is the Church, therefore, if before the authentic various kinds of abuse you dare to remind certain people that have or ecclesiastical laws prohibit, Today it happens frequently to be told: "enough, with these legalisms. There you may have noticed that in the Church there was a council?». And so it was that a self-styled historian of the Church with mocking arrogance asked me if I had heard that there had been a council, answered: . "Apart from the fact that in the Church of councils there were a total of twenty-one, But if you're referring to last, Know effect that they were summoned, It takes place and was finally closed in full compliance with all applicable laws and the canonical procedures. N'E evidence that before convening the Second Vatican Council, Pope John XXIII provident with a special bubble to close the First Vatican Council, who for various reasons of historical and political character had never been formally closed. Therefore it is easy to say that the opening of Vatican II starts right in full compliance with all the standard procedures'. . On the other hand it is well known: only priests and theologians are able to reach similar perversions of thought. Or maybe someone knows some judge, some prosecutor, some lawyer, or popular judges of the Assize Court that during the legal questions have began by saying: "enough, with these legalisms!». And if this is - but it is not ever happened in civil society - quell'eventuale recognized as mass murderer driven by preterintenzionalità, on the basis of what will be judged? On the basis of what criteria, except through judging criteria dictated exhaustively by law, this will determine if he deserves a life sentence or whether it will not be held guilty for suffering from mental disorders proven that despite his heinous crime, however, does not make it capable of acting intentionally, doing so come less than willful misconduct and guilt? . The. HERESY IS NOT A WORD GROSS AND GIVE heretic WHO FALLS AND REMAINS IN HERESY SUBSTANTIAL AND FORMAL NOT AN INSULT, MA MERE FACT FINDING . All this to achieve so as clear as possible to explain the word heresy, used in this paper to indicate the serious doctrinal errors of a Catholic lay movement: the Neocatechumenal Way. . The term heresy It comes from greek heresy and it is derived from elective, which literally means "grab", "to take", but it can also mean "choose" or "elect". In this lemma the Christian lexicon appears in Acts [cf. 5,17; 24,5; 24,14; 26,5; 28, 22] where it is assumed to indicate a person who after having weighted makes a choice animated by intentionality. In this Apostolic Letters greek motto he is hired and changed in its original etymology to take on a meaning all bad, linked to a deliberate choice of what is not true or that of divine revelation has been taken and altered [cf. The Cor 11, 19; Maybe 5,20; Pt II 2, 1]. It seems to make use of the word "heresy" to indicate and to fight deviant Christian currents in the authentic and correct apostolic teaching has been the first to the Father of the Church of the second century Justin thresholds. . Enter a theological school of thought, a pastoral style, or as in our specific case lay movement as a whole affection and contained such heresies, It constitutes neither an insult nor a treason attack. Say heretic, is not in fact synonymous with immoral nor synonymous with thug. In this case, two examples will suffice to clarify: l'eresiarca Pelagio [Britannia 360 – Palestine 420] It was not an immoral or dissolute. anything: It was an ascetic, a man driven by penitential spirit and strong will, the whole is then also join a deep culture. Those who lived in the course of their lives various forms of immorality and debauchery, who gave birth to a son without assuming his duties as a father and husband, this was Aurelio Thagaste, who converted and became Augustine of Hippo [Tagaste 354 – Ippona 430], Today the Holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church, heresies of Pelagius to the refuted one by one; and to do likewise became a work cut, given that this heresiarch was neither naive, nor without deep faith - though corrupted by error -, nor it was devoid of credit and followed by the Christian faithful. . another example: in 1215 the Fourth Lateran Council condemned the abbot Joachim of Fiore [cell 1130 – Pietrafitta 1202] a heretical thought known as millenarianism the gioachimismo. Note that neither the council which condemned him nor the Supreme Pontiffs who have succeeded by Innocent III summoned and presided over that meeting, They never doubted his holiness of life. Several times he even tried to beatify, albeit with failure. In 2001, on the occasion of the eighth centenary of his death, the Metropolitan Archbishop of Cosenza opened the diocesan phase of the process of beatification, the outcome of which - after coming to the Congregation for the Causes of Saints - at least we hope they remain uncertain. . It is reasonable penned these introductory pages only to come to say that in the Catholic lay movement known as Neocatechumenal, founded by the Spaniards Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández dead [Ólvega 1930 – Madrid 2016], there are not a few and disturbing elements heretical? Yes, it is reasonable to explain carefully all, if within the Church itself, unfortunately, we do not know the meaning of words, including the word heresy. . Structurally, this Movement, It is a sect for initiates election riddled with Christological heresies, pneumatological and ecclesiological. And, Despite long years of appeals and repeatedly directions given by the Supreme Pontiffs in persons, It continues to claim the right to have its specific Eucharistic liturgies and never approved by the Church, indeed decisively condemned by the documents of the Magisterium, in particular from the detailed Education Sacramentum of 2004, that seems almost written for members of this Movement [full text of the document, WHO]. This is combined with a catechism that beyond the texts agreed with the Holy See, but not respected rigor, spread doctrines contrary to those contained in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. What will certainly not secondary is their erroneous perception of the common priesthood of the baptized and the ministerial priesthood of the Ministers in sacris, with the consequence that within this movement the sacramental figure of Priests is totally dominated by that of laypersons, the so-called mega-catechists. And the perception of everything wrong that permeates the priesthood and that remains the Movement, It is dedicated the final part of my discussion. . Most of the mega-catechists of this movement They are having a doctrinal and theological preparation seriously flawed, If not sometimes non-existent. Tend to show themselves contemptuous of those who, through long years of study and research, he studied the various branches of the theological sciences, because it believes it has an initiatory wisdom that comes directly to them by the grace of the Holy Spirit, or rather by their idea completely unorthodox with the Holy Spirit. It is in fact well known and proven how these mega-catechists, when they were retrieved from theologians who have explained the serious doctrinal errors contained in certain of their catechesis, in response they reacted indicating these distinguished scholars - often men of great priestly piety and proven virtues of Christian life - as the subjects' closed to the actions of the Spirit ". . (II) FIRST THE MISUNDERSTANDING OF DEBUNKING: IF Neocatechumenal Way has run DEVELOPED UNDER THE TWO POPES pontificates SANTI, THIS MAKES IT MAYBE THE HOLY AND DOGMA OF THE INTANGIBLE Catholic Faith; ? . The history of this Movement It comes to life half a century ago and in that time have occurred on the Chair of Peter five Popes who for reasons not known to us have decided not to act in a firm and necessary way with authority, all while under their two Laity Lords eyes literally did what they wanted of the Holy Eucharist, at the same time giving the faithful a very wrong view of history of the Church, ecclesiology and sacramental. Some of the Neocatechumenal Movement leaders are accustomed to teaching their followers - then objected to outside criticism -, Recalling that two of these five Popes were canonized: Paul VI and John Paul II. Well, rather than an objection is indeed a truly non-Catholic perception of holiness itself, place that holiness does not require any exemptions from any error and then perfection. . Recall that the recognition of the heroic virtues, does not imply that every act, gesture, choice and decision accomplished in his life who was elevated to the altars, imply absolute perfection and total exemption from any kind of misjudgment, action or pastoral governance. Who thought this would fall so in a serious and gross heresy, thereby changing the Saints - or if some Popes Saints - in the Word of God incarnate, that since God was perfect as a man and his human nature was totally free from any experience even mild sin. Only Christ the Lord, however, was perfect in his human nature as God made man, and generated by the Holy Spirit from the Virgin preserved from the stain of original sin. Saints, instead, besides being born and being washed with the Holy Baptism from original sin, because they tend toward holiness were tempted by the Devil who has often tried by every means to induce them much more than others in sin and error. And maybe, their sinning and making mistakes, then washing from sin and correcting errors by virtue of the grace of the Holy Spirit from them accepted and fructified, They have become Saints, then models of heroic virtue for the people of God throughout. . How many saints have become such after departing from a human condition of life often burdened for a long time from the worst sins? The first historical information we have of the Blessed Apostle Paul, They are those for the case of the great diffuser of Christianity, or rather those related to Saul of Tarsus regretted not having the "canonical" age required to participate in the stoning of the deacon first martyr Stephen? [cf. At 7, 54-60]. Sant'Agostino, which has run previously mentioned, It may have arisen as a zealous Christian and especially as a virtue of caste model? I therefore find it disturbing that today, currents of thought or ecclesial lay movements, do blatant abuse of the figures of the last Popes Saints to effectively canonizing everything in thoughts, words and increasingly aggressive prescriptive forms they claim to impose on the entire Church. . Let us be very clear without hesitation, but above all try to be all the way: Holy Church canonized Blessed Pope John Paul II through a pronouncement definitive which falls within the so-called second degree the infallible teaching [cf. To defend the faith, § 2] exercised in this case by the Supreme Pontiff Francis I [cf. Lumen Gentium, n. 25]. The pronouncement definitive But as the heroic virtues of this Holy Pontiff, of which the Church has certainly not dogmatized formula definitional every pastoral option and Government, including the unfortunate acceptance of the Neocatechumenal Way, not to be confused at all so fraudulent propaganda and with his full approval, why the Holy Father John Paul II granted it; its maximum concession was a test to experiment granted on 28 June 2002, when the then President of the Pontifical Council for the Laity, Cardinale James Francis Stafford, Founders gave the Movement the text of the decree approving to experiment of their new statute duly revised and corrected in previous years by the competent dicasteries of the Holy See. As it was granted provisional approval to experiment Statute, the twelve volumes of the Catechetical Directory of the Movement seguitavano instead to lie sub judice [under the scrutiny of the judge] at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, headed at the time by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. . So acceptance and approval conditioning, not full approval. A acceptance, however, occurred at very tight teeth, in the hope of being able to correct the doctrinal and liturgical deviations of this movement by holding it in the bosom of the Holy Church. Therefore, if under the pontificate of the Holy Father John Paul II, pastorally responsible for failing to intervene in time and with the necessary and decisive authority, the Neocatechumenal Way has made every worst form of liturgical abuse and deviation from the orthodox Catholic doctrine, everything - that is theologically clear - it is not sealed by any automatic or dogmatic formula final nor definitional due to sudden canonization of Blessed Pope John Paul II. Therefore, the canonization of Blessed Pope John Paul II does not imply in any way and for any reflection of the canonization of the Neocatechumenal Way, nor they can rise to the dogma of faith their liturgical abuses and appalling blunders he doctrinaire disseminated today by their mega-catechists. . Without detracting from the sanctity of the Holy Father John Paul II, we can say that the posthumous trial of the facts he was wrong not to stop in time such a movement. Exactly as in the past, several other of his predecessors, including Saints Popes Gregory and Leo the Great, They have also made their good errors in certain assessments and in certain pastoral choices, without this compromise either their holiness nor meritorious title of Magna that both was conferred by the Holy Church. . Seguitino therefore members of the Neocatechumenal Way to affirm their followers or during their proselytism, to be grown and have multiplied under the pontificates of two Santi Pontefici and being by them, they say, approved in all respects. And while they continue to affirm them or to convince these colossal untruths to their followers, I remain with all the recognized freedom of the children of God who joined the little bit of theological science leads me to say that I possess, then to replicate, that such a claim is simply absurd, but just abhorrent. . III Neocatechumenals TAKE LIFE CRISIS OF AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH AND GROW IN THE POPE JOHN PAUL II AFTER HIM MADE THE FAMILY DE THE WHITE MILL . The Neocatechumenal were able to develop because they are placed in the period of the post-council during which it developed within the Church is a crisis of unprecedented historical authorities, and at the same time, failing authority, They have developed forms of arbitrary authoritarianism why they were formerly known. This is the ecclesial and ecclesiastical land on which develops and takes life in complete impunity a lay peppered movement of heresies, with a vision totally distorted and falsante priesthood, combined with the Holy Eucharist conception that has repeatedly flirted in many of their celebrations - widely and rigorously documented -, The real sacrilege. . How can it have happened that the Holy Father John Paul II He has fallen into the trap of the founders of the Neocatechumenal Way? It is a question which I have often responded by explaining that the Lords Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández has recognized a considerable abilities. It has been in a very skillful way that they have presented to the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II what he held dear: family and sexual morality. So things are no easier pain of denial: in a Europe increasingly secularized and hedonistic, they have presented to the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II families with high fertility, as well as on solid moral principles, at least in appearance. And just like in the images of an old advertisement of multinational Barilla, Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández presented the so-called perfect, happy family of The Mulino Bianco [cf. video WHO]. And the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II fell for, without jeopardizing in any way nor the heroic virtues nor its sanctity, for the reasons already explained in a clear and detailed: Saints are saints, but men are not perfect nor free from errors, including sometimes even blunders. . IV THE Neocatechumenal Way HAS MADE AGAIN PRESENT THE OLD Albigensian Heresy, CHURCH BEFORE IT RAISED WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY BRAKE TO THE FACT THAT THE EUCHARIST IS NOT AN ARTICLE OF WHICH THEY MAY HAVE PRIVATE TASTE YOUR . The Neocatechumenal Movement is a true paradigm than it is the return to the modernity of the oldest heresies. The proselytizing Neocatechumenal, all it focused on targeted catechesis to the rediscovery of baptism, He reported on the scene of our times what was once the ancient heresy of the Cathars, which developed modulating another heresy, that of the Cathars. We recall in this regard that the Albigensian heresy spread in France between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. The speakers of this current invited their followers to a Christian initiation stretched toward a goal indicated by them as consolamentum, a very similar doctrine to that of neocatecumenato, aimed at the rediscovery of baptism. The Cathars were notoriously arrogant both porgersi that in proselytizing, but mostly they used to pose as the elect among the elect or the purest of the pure, not by chance, as I said before, take the moves by the Cathars, whose name derives from the greek clean, which means "pure". Especially insulting was then their attitude towards Ministers in sacris, Bishops and priests, before which the laity placed themselves in ways often arrogant feeling invested with special graces and spiritual gifts through the authentic rediscovery of their Baptism. the Albigensian, at a time when either one was out or was inside without much middle ground, they ended up creating a parallel church, with all that in conflicts and wars ensued logical consequence, given that at the time could not exist together within the Church opposites and opposites, thesis and antithesis. The whole as opposed to today, where in order to keep within the Church of all and more, in a communion that is not communion but only an illusion of communion, on the one hand we have communities that celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice with the Missal of St. Pius V and the other the Neocatechumenal who make the liturgy of the Holy Eucharist and what they want, up to turn it into a joyful and dancing commemoration flavor Calvinist, Jewish symbolism with exotic to say the least out of place, as if the Mass were a cross between Calvin's dinner and order of Pesach [The Pesach Seder, Dinner Passover]. E chi, before all this, painfully it tends to justify saying that within the Church have always lived together events and different expressions, It confuses what is the precious diversity - for example that represented over the centuries by the various expressions and forms of religious or spiritual life - with what instead is the lack of oversight and accountability on the part of ecclesiastical authority, by divine mandate, They are called to protect the unit "one Lord, one faith, one baptism " [If the 4, 5], not to permit and encourage the spread in the silence of the wild personalities that, as in the case of the Neocatechumenal, when they touch the sacred Eucharistic liturgy, which it is the heart and center of unity of the whole universal Church, they end up submitting the universality of those particularities that in fact always come out as highly arrogant and egocentric personality. . The liturgical celebrations of the Neocatechumenal Way swarm of the worst abuses, enough to remember how many times the Holy See has called the founders of the Movement about the problem of sermons preached by laymen during Mass, the dances of the faithful during the liturgy, to insist on receiving Holy Communion sat hand in hand rubbing the big Copponi happy with the Precious Blood of Christ. To follow with the pack of bread for the Eucharist according to the meticulous standards established by Kiko Argüello, the total disregard for the dispersal of fragments consecrated Eucharistic bread, the inadequate purification of the sacred vessels, but above the desired and taught lack of eucharistic devotion, the refusal to genuflect and lack of de facto institutionalized piety towards the Blessed Sacrament. . A proof of bad faith objective the leaders of the Neocatechumenal Way - and in the case now will report their official spokesman -, suffice it to say that every time that the founders were called in Rome and repeatedly rebuked by the then Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Cardinal Francis Arinze, from Rome are back more and running the following proclamation to their followers: "The Holy See has approved us!». Now, when you are called to be invited to get in line, as it happened when he was granted a precise given time to adjust to all the liturgical rules of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal and education Sacramentum but for the whole answer instead of saying “They have lovingly called”, news spreads among the adepts, "we have been approved!», It is obvious: or it is completely cleaved from the actual, or you are dishonest and liars. In this regard it would be important to read a letter from the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments that, clearly and also peremptory, uses the expression unequivocal: "I have to inform the Holy Father's decisions'. After that, As soon as the leaders of the Neocatechumenal Way [full text, WHO], as their use and practice did pass a recall and a decision of the Supreme Pontiff for approval to all their liturgical and doctrinal oddities, at that point, Prefect, I weighed in by releasing an interview to Vatican Radio that could not be misunderstood even by an experienced professional forger [all texts since outlined above are contained, WHO]. . From the foregoing we understand well how complex the problem Neocatechumenal, all in the face of any analysis that aims to be really polished and impartial. Complexity that truly require lengthy, detailed treatises on the historical level, ecclesiological, pastoral, doctrinal and theological. Not to mention the psychological aspect, place that is not at all difficult to ascertain and demonstrate that a high number of followers are people burdened by considerable weakness and fragility of character, often suffering from the bitterness of existential failures have not been processed and passed, then he tended to seek security in seemingly strong structures and imbued in them a sense of divine election. And, all this, as specialists can try to strictly scientific level, It is typical of these aggregation-known phenomenon in clinical psychology as a psycho-sects. . The WHEN THE CHURCH IS ALL EXCUSES FOR NOT LISTENING TO THE VICTIMS OF VARIOUS KIND, He ENDS AT THE END COL Collision THE CARDINALS TO BARS OF CRIMINAL COURTS, BUT EVEN IF SO FOLLOWED unabated to NOT LISTEN . If today the Church finds himself visible for years to have to deal with scandals of moral and patrimonial nature, this is due to the fact that for many years did not listen to the cry of pain of the victims; on the contrary, in many cases the victims were severely punished by the Church authorities not only for daring to suffer, but for daring to finally make public their grief and seek justice against the powerful bullies insidiatisi to power in the visible Church which today appears as a veritable structure of sin what kind of sin within itself and releases it outside. If certain orders, religious congregations or historical West Abbeys, now they collapsed, the fault is precisely those that Ecclesiastical Authority received complaints for years, complaints and reports, They have not listened, indeed they have accused several times of revenge and prevention both priests, both former religious and laity who dared bring serious facts to their attention. Today, those complaints yesterday burying, dares to appear before the cameras and the microphones of journalists called to affirm falsely Vaticanists: "We did not know, We never imagined!». At that point - and their terrible shame, but above all to the detriment of their own immortal souls - these so-called journalists Vaticanists, that the facts and the pain of the victims know him rather well and for a long time, offer without shame and without any sense of shame at the podium justificatory these true murderers of the Holy Church. Well know, these so-called journalists Vaticanists, that their offense has a specific name: collusion with manslaughter. . The ecclesiastical authority, or the little that it remains on the ruins of the sense of now completely destroyed authorities for decades, even in the case of the Neocatechumenal it has applied the same principle limited to brand as "spiteful" and "biased" all those who by this movement came out after terrible experiences also, for example, after being invaded and investigated up to the deepest of their minds from the various mega-catechists, several of which are responsible for the destruction of entire families; e chi, among us priests welcomed, collected and repeatedly tried to heal the wounds of entire families, certain dynamics has got to experience them well and thoroughly, in what in reality is the emergency room of what some like to show today as "church field hospital"; an emergency room where to pick up the wounded we concretely us, not the hallowed halls of the ideologues. . While anything that occurred rare cases of this kind, including individuals and families coming out of the Neocatechumenal Way they have lost homes and jobs, not to mention the separation instigated pairs, during those numerous and large gatherings that were nothing more than public numerical strength tests by the founders of the Movement, the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II were presented armies of husbands and wives who do not yet smiling thirties had already given birth to three or four children per family;, Catholic model advertising format de The Mulino Bianco, He is missing only the Spanish actor Antonio Banderas in one of these famous spot converses with hen Rosita [cf. video WHO]. . Without all of these premises due, my theological and doctrinal discourse can take now start. The first point that should be examined carefully in fact, is as follows: the Neocatechumenal Way, It can truly be called a Catholic lay movement? If Catholic doctrine and theology are not a vague opinion entirely moot, I must say no, stating with extreme concern and displeasure that the Neocatechumenate is in fact a community of Jewish-Protestant matrix that has a Catholic only the outer casing totally emptied its own internal ones that are the same basic elements of Catholicism. That is easy to say what: postpone, between a futile appeal and the other followed one another over the years, waiting for the things you put in place by themselves, no one should take responsibility, what is more painful and especially unpopular, denotes and gives evidence of the dangerous recklessness of our Ecclesiastical Authority and many diocesan bishops, many of whom have left in the hands of this movement the majority of the parishes in their dioceses, replicating every alarmed perplexity posed by their parish priests with a phrase that never should appear on the mouth of a bishop: "... I have already found them settled and branched, what ever I could do?». Add another: in several Italian dioceses, if you are not Neocatechumenal, you have no chance to gain access to the permanent diaconate, because for years the selection of future deacons and the assessment of their suitability has been fully delegated to the members of this Movement, all in the total number of diocesan bishops complicit silence. . WE THE BIG LIE OF DIRECTORS OF THE WAY NEUCATECUMENALE: CLAIM THAT THE CHURCH HAS RECOGNIZED AND THEIR FULLY legitimized antics LITURGICAL and catechetical . The Neocatechumenal leaders lie - I fear unfortunately aware of lying - when you have such a movement recognized in every way by the Holy See in its expressions and actions. This is entirely false. As I explained earlier, the leaders of the Neocatechumenal Way have been trying for years to get from the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments the seal of approval on all their serious liturgical abuses. The competent department has, however, never recognized certain arbitrary ways, and quite stubborn to celebrate the Holy Eucharist, which it is not a disposable good on which could decide the founders of the Neocatechumenal Way or the "employees priests" by the neocatecumenalizzati; anything, this Sacred Congregation has repeatedly them and also severely reprimanded urging them to respect the laws and of the liturgical books. . Therefore truth, the proven and the acts of the Holy See, but silenced by those within the Movement proselytizing or drive affiliates, is that after extensive consultation with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, the Pontifical Council for the Laity approved before the Constitution and then the Catechetical Directory both duly corrected, but you pay attention: never the Holy See, through the competent dicastery, It approved those that are in fact arbitrary and sometimes even sacrilegious rites of the Neocatechumenal. And note also that the Pontifical Council for the Laity, approving the statutes duly corrected, also he asked that they return all publications and mimeographed of the old statutes and the so-called tea towels of catechesis given to mega-catechists, so that they do not seguitassero to be the object of teaching. They enforced and respected all? The answer is: No! They hired a facade, with the official facade documents, with a Holy Mass facade when the bishops have a pastoral visit or when there are the Ecclesiastical Authority, except, however, continue to teach the doctrinal errors of all time and to celebrate with impudent arbitrariness Mass as they want and in unconsecrated space, including the Diocese of the Roman Pontiff, in which they hold about 90 metropolitan parishes of 332. . The decree of 20 January 2012 [cf. text, WHO], He has never approved the exotic liturgies and not of sacrilegious rarely the Neocatechumenal Way, as so false and fraudulent claiming instead go to neophytes and the numerous followers mega-catechists. A lack of approval due to the fact that certain celebrations are patently contrary to the laws of the Church and liturgical practices that the universal Church has codified the General Instruction of the Roman Missal and ordinances of the recognized and approved rites, Rite- Ambrosiano until Malabar Rite. Even despite, You never approved this kind of celebrations, continuing impunity in the movement and they continue to be celebrated appartatamente in salons and unconsecrated space. Therefore, the mega-catechists who spread falsehood and certain approvals that have never given to their liturgical abuses, one simply ask: show me the decree with which the Holy See, through its competent department, which it is the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, He recognizes and legitimizes as "ritual" celebrations made to your interior in violation of the dispositions of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal and the Instruction Sacramentum. While I, for my part, I shall show you the decree of the Pontifical Council for the Laity, which reiterates once again the Neocatechumenal: . "Your apostolic action intends to take place in the heart of the Church, in total harmony with her directives and in communion with the particular Churches in which you are going to operate making the most of the fullness of charisms that the Lord has awakened through the initiators of the Way " [cf. text, WHO]. . What does it mean: "In total harmony with the directives of the Church"? There I explain the mega-catechists of the Neocatechumenal Way what it means, if you consider the manner in which careless and disobedient they continue undeterred to organize exotic Masses in private salons and in unconsecrated space, affirming and declaring with rare and mendacious impudence: "The Church has approved it!». . There is no "Rite Neocatechumenal" Church-approved, But they do exist - I repeat without fear of being wordy -: documents, letters, exhortations and various reminders to follow the liturgical norms of the universal Church. The Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, after having read out the decree of approval of the statutes correct, He addressed a precise speech at the "Staff" of the Neocatechumenal clarifying: . «[…] A little while ago I was reading the decree with which they are approved celebrations in the "Catechetical Directory of the Neocatechumenal Way", that they are not strictly liturgical, but they are part of the itinerary of growth in faith. It is another element that shows you how the Church accompany you with care in a patient discernment, which includes your wealth, but also looks to the communion and harmony of the whole Corpus Church […] Precisely in order to facilitate the rapprochement to the richness of the sacramental life by people who have drifted away from the Church, or they have not received adequate training, Neocatechumenals can celebrate the Sunday Eucharist in the small community, after the first Vespers on Sunday, accordance with the provisions of the diocesan Bishop (cf. Statutes, art. 13 §2). But every Eucharistic celebration is an action of the one Christ together with his one Church and therefore essentially open to all those who belong to this His Church. This public character of the Holy Eucharist is expressed in the fact that every celebration of Holy Mass is ultimately directed by the Bishop as a member of the College of Bishops, responsible for a particular local church [cfr Conc. ecum. Vat. (II), Cost. dogmatic. Lumen Gentium, 26]. The celebration in small communities, regulated by the liturgical books, which should be followed faithfully, and with the peculiarity approved the Statutes of the Way, It has the task of helping those who are undergoing the Neocatechumenal itinerary to perceive the grace of being inserted in the saving mystery of Christ, which it makes possible a Christian witness also able to take on the traits of radicalism. At the same time, the progressive maturity in faith of the individual and the small community should facilitate their integration into the life of the great ecclesial community, that is in the liturgical celebration of the parish, in which and for which it implements the Neocatechumenate [cf. Statutes, art. 6], its ordinary form. But even when the path is important not to separate themselves from the parish community, precisely in the celebration of the Eucharist which is the true place of unity of all, where the Lord embraces us in the various states of our spiritual maturity and unites us in the bread which makes us one body [cf. 1 Color 10, 16with]» [full text, WHO]. . With the delicacy that has always characterized, Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, addressing the "general staff" of the Neocatechumenal, was it not very clear? It was all right, but it was with all the clear pastoral meekness that was to him his, making its words addressed to people structurally permeated by a strong internal authoritarianism thereby totally ineffective. Persons to whom they give directives and precise orders and decided, ammantanti from all divine aura that emanates from the mega-catechist who speaks and acts invested by the fire of the Holy Spirit, and before which is not discussed, you run. This is the mistake of a fine mint how mild this was one of our previous Supreme Pontiff: offer insights to reason and then come to the obvious conclusions. All this, however, you can practice, and so also very effective, with those who live lowered into the real history of the universal Church and in that which is the essence contained in the encyclical the Holy Father John Paul II: Fides et ratio. Unfortunately instead, the Neocatechumenate, like other lay movements variously different but related, It is not structured on fides the A ratio, but on emotion and charisma, real or perceived, but the evidence shows unquestionably egocentric of its founder Kiko Argüello. Therefore, Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, He spoke to people a language that they do not know and therefore are not able to understand; and that no bad faith or lack of will, but for the kind of deformation that have received within that Movement, where everything revolves on emotions and control people through their emotional sphere. With those words the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI has said everything, But only to the ears of those who are able to understand, not to those who can not because it does not formed to incorporate. At this second kind of people, he has only given proof of weakness, in practice as if he had said: "I think in this way, on the contrary, Forgive me if you think so. But I respect you and appreciate you very much, You seguitate so you can do what you want and what you like ". . If we want to put it more clear yet we must add that at the time reigning Supreme Pontiff, spoke pastoral-curialese in the old farmers of the old-Agro Pontino who do not even know where to abide the rudiments of diplomatic sciences. Indeed, in the best pastoral-curialese, it first begins thanking and putting in a good light all the positives, and then, Gently sum and so always very pompous, in the continuation of the discourse we try to highlight the flaws and things that do not go. obsequious and devoted Question: from a speech now set, But facing the worthy and precious farmers who work with great dedication to the Agro-Pontine lands late nineteenth century, what do you think the Pope who remained, listeners? To understand what these people be left in such a pompous speech pastoral-curialese, just go around the various halls and unconsecrated space in which the Neocatechumenal - for example, in a territory such as Italian, where certainly no shortage of available churches of all styles and sizes - they continue undeterred to celebrate with their "rites" not the Eucharistic Sacrifice of the Mass, but the so-called messa kikiana, inserted in the context of a joyful agape fraterna, behind closed doors and with the rigorous exclusion of non-belonging to the Movement. . To understand who the Neocatechumenal to be as problematic subjects come to life, would simply be enough that the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, writing that very delicate speech pastoral-curialese, he reminded himself an episode remained in the historical memory of the Roman Curia, because it was just a fact without historical precedent. The year was 1980 when the 2 November, the Pope visited the Roman parish of Canadian Martyrs. On that occasion the Neocatechumenal gave further proof of overbearing arrogance meeting the Pope in the crypt of the church after having excluded and left out all those belonging to other church groups. During the speech given by Pope it happened to Carmen Hernandez, co-founder with Arguello of the Neocatechumenal, more than once interrupted until contestargli reproachfully to have indicated the Neocatechumenate as a "movement". The Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, at a certain point he became irritated, and using a phrase of the Blessed Apostle Paul rebuked that emerita cheeky rude that purported to deal face to face the Roman Pontiff: "The silent woman!» [The Cor 14, 34]. Therefore, I believe that that is enough and is enough to wonder: what kind of effect believed to be able to achieve with its mildness and its pastoral-curialese Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, turning so meek and pompous people who had given evidence for years and years, very early days, not to possess a sense of proportion dictated by the basic rudiments of the common good Catholic sense? . The ecclesiastical authority, or the little that it remains on the ruins of the sense of now completely destroyed authorities for decades, It should know that the Holy Eucharist for the Neocatechumenate is considered essentially a joyous fraternal banquet. What does this even due to Lutheranism but to Calvinism. In addition to, i Neocatecumenali, even limited to reject the concept and the teaching that the Eucharist is a true sacrifice, because they do not hesitate to teach that the belief that the Eucharist is a sacrifice, It would be something pagan and unchristian. Neither the founders of the Neocatechumenal Way or the mega-catechists interested in anything the teaching of the Council of Trent that to save Christi fideles Protestant heresy sanctioned as a dogma of faith that the Sacrifice of the Mass contains a propitiatory element [Enchiridion Denzinger-Schönmetzer, No.. 1743, 1753, sex. XXII] and that it was wanted and commanded by Christ the Lord. The Eucharist is thus a joyous commemoration, but a propitiatory sacrifice offered for both the living and the dead. The Sacrifice of the Mass is not the repetition of the bloody sacrifice of the Cross, but it is the one sacrifice of Christ made present under sacramental signs, It not surprisingly is used to always define the term "bloodless sacrifice". . VII HEALTHY ENOUGH TO MAKE A MOVE THE MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE THE BRAVE ? SUFFICIENT THE EVIDENCE OF WHO SAYS: "THE WAY I HAVE CONVERTED", "THE PATH TO CHURCH I returned"? . A movement which in fact is burdened by many doctrinal errors, with a perception of sacramental often resulted in true heresy, animated by an incorrect ecclesial vision that can make it much more like a sect, where the same Founders have placed the emotional element and the emotional element transmission at the center of subjective experience and group, using the same emotions to control followers, may be acquitted because within it there are many good people, or because many individuals claim that thanks to the Camino have returned to the Church or converted? Well, I myself can testify to have made so many individuals and entire families animated by sincere Christian sentiments, but this does not free, however, the Neocatechumenal Way or doctrinal error nor sectarianism and especially by the various "heresies return" and the history of the Church have been dusted off and modulated, then reported to the fore, the catechesis of Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández. In this regard, I invite you to read the prophetic analysis made in 1983 the Servant of God Pier Carlo Landucci [available in this file, WHO]. . Again we proceed with examples: Medjugorje, in thirty years, according to what I said a very large number of individual witnesses, There would have been many more spiritual healings and conversions instead of how many you will not have been in Fatima over a whole century. Question to say the least relevant: because the Church has never recognized as authentic the Medjugorje phenomenon and data messages from Madam a continuous stream for a few decades in the seers when self-styled, whereas recognized as genuine the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, recognizing the authenticity of the messages given to the three shepherd, two of which were first beatified and then canonized? Does this mean that the numerous conversions and spiritual healings in Medjugorje in three decades are not authentic, while are those that occurred in certainly much fewer in Fatima over a whole century? . If someone wants to know what I think in this regard - given that my free thinking can not and should not have any weight, given that what is true and authentic can only establish the Church, not the personalism of some individual priests, including the Director of Radio Maria - I can answer that I believe in the authenticity of both conversions and spiritual healing, because the grace of God, if there is to retrieve a soul, It is able to make use of authentic Madonna as a false Madonna. Wishing I can even add that by a false Madonna, God's grace, It could also operate the most difficult spiritual healing. The grace of God can indeed everything, but really everything and in every sense. The grace of God, to save a soul, It could use even Satan himself while he worked to try to be able to condemn this soul forever. God alone, indeed, It can also be availed of Satan to turn in the highest saving good work of the supreme evil targeted to damn the souls. A concrete example: we have many painful and poignant testimonies of people who have long been devoted to Satanism and the occult, and which during the execution of these rituals have warned Mephistopheles suddenly something inside themselves, and at that point their consciousness totally asleep hath awakened, to the point that a few days later, weeping and afflicted, They were kneeling before a confessor to implore the grace and forgiveness of God. Having clarified this lends itself toaution to the fact that only God can use what is bad or wrong doctrinally in order to change evil into good and to conduct the erroneous doctrine of the real saving truth, we can not go to embrace evil or doctrinal error thinking of being able to obtain good; and this should be very clear to any believer who has learned the basic rudiments of catechism as a child preparing for First Communion. . Drawing from my experience as a confessor, every time I happen to narrate much suffering figure of a young homosexual who in my humble opinion it was a true angel of God on this earth. In him was really profound suffering, not at all due to those human guilt to defeat with a proper psychoanalysis conducted by a psychoanalyst Freud's atheistic, supporter gender and movements LBGT. In this young, there was a real and authentic sense of sin. On the one hand, He suffered the attraction towards people of the same sex, who would not want to have, the other could not control. Speaking to me of his situation poses some really terrible questions in their existential drama: . "Why did God allow this to me? If I had been suffering from a malignant tumor would have accepted with much more ease that deadly disease, and I would have suffered much less, instead, having to accept this my grave moral disorder, and this devastating spiritual sickness, He brings me the much stronger suffering. Indeed, while a sick person feels such and often ends up accepting their illness, instead I'm not sick but who are suffering from a grave moral disorder, I do not feel sick in the body, Why not have it, But I feel dirty soul, something far worse than any physical illness'. . Such a person could have been easily lead to hold a keynote at the Higher Institute of Moral Theology Academy Alfonsiana, so much better than many teachers might explain the concept of sin and the profound pain and sometimes excruciating that pervades the sinner, this thing that, I repeat, It is quite different from the human and simple guilt, because God wants our sincere repentance from sin, He does not want our guilt before the sin. . From my confessor No one could why God, in a young man so beautiful, intelligent, sensible, intellectually gifted, coming from a good family and social context, he could afford it, with all the deep pain that went with it, and that, When he had to tell me the person concerned: "It burns inside me like an unquenchable flame that never goes out". One time, after confession, I explained that for a sinner like me, perform an Angel, It was an extraordinary lesson of Christian life. I added: . "While maybe I'll do me a long Purgatory and I'll have to answer to God for who knows how many sins, but not perceived as such and time from my consciousness that instead she felt in perfect order, you will be in Paradise, where I hope you will pray for the repose of my soul. And a day, When in eternal life you will find yourself face to face with God, surely the Divine Majesty will show you one by one all the souls in Purgatory with the offer of your grief you saved from eternal damnation; and these souls will bow before you in thanksgiving ". . In this account I have said that homosexuality is all well and good, nor I stated that homosexuality happily practiced is a very effective means to reach the blissful reward of eternal life; I said - and again I repeat - that God's grace can also make use of a grave moral disorder situation to redeem a soul, and along with it wash, with deep sorrow of this man, even the sin of many other sinners, because in this kind of pain experienced as a Christian he has lived this young, take over the elements of the redemption and salvation enclosed in Encyclical saving Passion the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II. . All this can be applied as a response to certain questions regarding the Neocatechumenal Way that as a pastor in the care of souls, and as a theologian I have never suggested to any faithful or as a way of redemption or as a way to salvation, indeed I have always recommended so very decisive, explaining that it is an experience full of grave doctrinal errors and serious liturgical abuses still committed in total disregard of the provisions and ordered by the Holy See. But if God decides to save a soul, if necessary, it is able to also make use of Satan himself, strappandogliela from the clutches just as the Principe of this world was going to be able to dannarla forever. But I do think you can run happy and joyful with arms wide open to Satan, to his works and all his empty promises, convinced to achieve thereby the salvation of his soul, because there is nothing worse than to challenge the grace and mercy of God. A little 'as the ones you are saying: "Father, she pray for me because I have no time or to go to church or to pray ". Several times I have responded: "You'll see what will happen then when God tells you: "Now I have more time to save!”». However instead, there Neocatecumenali, the good faith of the largest fund most of whom would never dare discuss, you can blame bad to celebrate the liturgies, not to follow the liturgical norms, It might even scold the evil and pray with the serious risk of not praying in perfect communion with the Church whenever you make personalistic liturgy, so unstable and separated from its universal ecclesial dimension. But you can hardly blame them not to pray with a sincere spirit, all because, since I am a priest of Christ formed as Holy Mother Church commands and not instead of being a mega-catechist without any real training and historical culture, philosophical and theological, I am well aware that no one can judge the deep consciousness of man, that only God can know; and nobody can, nor ever has to invade, this consciousness. Unheard and serious invasions of consciences do not do it the priests of Christ formats such as Holy Mother Church commands, to make the so-called practice kikos, better known as mega-catechists, before which the Ecclesiastical Authority followed silenced merely periodic bestow pull ears during the various papal audiences, beginning to produce only result that those reproaches in one ear and entering the other shoot out immediately. . To those who have no time to pray and attend church life sacramental and we can add as conclusive as those people who boast of their sin, and indeed there is nothing worse than that of proud of his sin: "…Eh, Father expensive, What can I do, I have great sex, I have always liked women, My wife now has his years, and I have to look for fresh meat '. These individuals believe they have the exclusive world of manhood among the faithful husbands of this world - many of whom could bringing this as they say even a lot bigger and far more durable than their -, I instead replied: "I can guarantee you that you too like you a lot, indeed know that the Devil like you very much, and in due time your merry adulterous coitus with "fresh meat" you reward them eternally in Hell, because nothing is more pleasing to Satan man who glories in his own sin, even before those to whom Christ has given a mandate to forgive sins [cf. LC 24, 45-48; GV 20, 21-23]». And this is obvious: a man who lives his life in this way and that for various reasons were to approach any community Neocatechumenal, It would not only be invited to conversion and salvation of one's soul, but they would try in every way to help him, and in some cases they may even succeed, on the contrary: in many cases they were able to retrieve people who lived morally disastrous lives. And what has been accomplished and achieved, so commendable and meritorious, not only by the sect of the Neocatechumenal, but also from many other sects that consider the Catholic Church a aggregation that since the time post-Constantine would betray the true and authentic message of the Holy Gospel, as they taught Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández and how they continue to teach undeterred in closed rooms initiation of many mega-catechists, that from the heretical sects of Christian matrix took evident and ample food. . In Way there are catechetical exhibitions that follow the criticisms to the Catholic Church by Jehovah's Witnesses and the same published on several occasions in their international magazine translated into twenty languages and distributed worldwide: . "Historical facts reveal the truth about the" greatness "of Constantine. Far from having been founded by Jesus Christ, the Head of the true Christian congregation, Christianity is partly the result of political expediency and skillful maneuvering of a pagan emperor. Quite appropriately the historian Paul Johnson asks: "It was the empire to surrender to Christianity, or Christianity was prostitution empire?"All those who truly wish to follow the pure Christianity can be helped to recognize the true Christian congregation today, and to associate with it. Worldwide, Jehovah's Witnesses are more than happy to help sincere people to identify the true Christianity and to worship God in the way that he likes " [The Watchtower, fourth year 1998, See full text, WHO]. . Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández have "formed" generations of mega-catechists teaching in a similar way that the whole structure, practice and ecclesiastical liturgy have been distorted and biased between the third and fourth centuries century after the peace of Constantine, when the political power, needing a religion as a socio-political glue, He encouraged the entry of large masses in the Church, which it was filled with symbols and pagan rituals that caused him to lose the authentic vitality of faith of the 'early Church'. Thus, after "the almost total immobility determined by the Council of Trent" which was surpassed only about five centuries later by the Vatican Council II, He was launched the "rediscovery" of the "true origins" through the work and teaching of the Neocatechumenal Way. In their various catechesis debut - but not only in those of debut -, Founders of the Neocatechumenal Way did not hesitate to be ironic that, since Constantine to follow, the Holy Spirit "was closed in the bottle for centuries", this is to say for the beauty of sixteen centuries, not until the bottle was uncorked by their subjective, wrong and especially heretical idea distorted and falsante of Vatican Council II. . These serious heresies are extended so devastating to the Most Holy Eucharist, which it is the heartbeat of the Church; and we know what happens, When a body is struck at the heart. Yet they have done so for many years, teaching and transmitting these serious heresies integer staff mega-catechists in the crypt of the parish of Canadian Martyrs: . "The sacrificial ideas have entered the Eucharist to condescendingly suggested by the historical moment the pagan mentality; instead of the Death God of the religions that you move just gives you a blow on the head, we discover the God of Jesus Christ; maybe God needs the blood of his Son to subside? What kind of God we did? We came to think that God appeased his anger in the sacrifice of his Son in the manner of pagan deities!» [Comments on documented catechesis of Kiko Arguello by Pier Carlo Landucci and reported in his article 1983, See full text, WHO]. . The various heretical movements of Christian roots, beyond their grave doctrinal errors, They can do good? Of course yes. Great good works were in fact carried out for the benefit of individuals and families from the sect of the Mormons, the sect of Pentecostals, by the numerous sects that come to life by diverse and fragmented world of Protestantism, many of which have saved people from alcoholism, from drugs, a life marked on crime or a life built on the worst moral disorders. And maybe, the day when God - after giving us right after death his immediate trial - when it finally judge the living and the dead, recognize these heretics greatest merits of those who recognize not to many Catholics that the truth and the unique and authentic Church, the willed and founded by Christ the Lord, they did however terrible havoc: . "And Jesus said to them,: "Truly I tell you: The tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God. Is John came to you in the way of righteousness, and you did not believe; the tax collectors and the prostitutes believed him instead. You, on the contrary, though she had seen these things, you do not even repent and believe him "» [Mt 21, 31-32]. . To the many who repeatedly told me "The Neocatechumenal there is so much of the good ', "Thanks to the Neocatechumenal Way I converted", "Thanks to the Neocatechumenal Way have returned to the faith after twenty years since I entered more into the churches", I think I have responded by explaining that all these are subjective experiences related in the report, much of inscrutable God working man through his divine grace. The numerous and recognized positive subjective experiences, But do not cancel by this movement who are sectarian attitudes, stubbornness to celebrate liturgies do not conform to the liturgical books of the Church, nor they erased by many heresies catechesis series, serious or sometimes coarse that they emerge from the mouths of their mega-catechists. Neither subjective positive elements can erase the fact that, when Neocatechumenal ranging mission, do not go there at all to evangelize as we should, but neocatecumenalizzare and announce the "sacred word" of the false prophet and the bad teacher Kiko Argüello. And that's a fact, It is not a malevolent supposition, are exhaustive testing many bishops, or even some whole episcopal conferences around the world have been expelled from their dioceses Movement, following the divisions created among the faithful by mega-animated missionary catechists from contemptuous disregard of pastoral directives given by the local bishops, If such a blatant way was that of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Japan also ordered the closing of the seminar mother of The Redeemer opened in the Diocese of Takamatsu [cf. report available, WHO]. So how many times, other bishops, They refused to ordain priests formats seminarians in seminaries of the Neocatechumenal Way, including the Primate of the Catholic Church of England, Cardinale Basil Hume, in that 1996 He refused to order priests fifteen seminarians trained in the workshop of the Movement, giving the following clear motivation for its refusal: . "These seminarians, once they would have ranked as a reference point, more than its own bishop, the leaders of their communities, thus creating problems within the diocese ". . Many were the bishops in Italy very critical in the past that have not allowed the movement to gain a foothold in their dioceses, among many cite only the Archbishop of Milan, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, that he declared "not to share the fact that the Neocatechumenal led a liturgical life separate from that of the parish community" [Interview The Tablet, edition 29 October 1999]. Question: why the Supreme Ecclesiastical Authority have never given the fact that the Neocatechumenal Way was regarded with suspicion and found to be in non-positive way, by bishops of various parts of the world and especially belonging indistinctly to all the various currents? Using the terms entirely improper and not in accordance with the Church's vocabulary, such as the definitions "conservative" and "progressive", then ask ourselves with all due concern of the case: because of such short-sighted lack of prudent and lucid critical sense, the supreme authority of the Holy See did not take into account the fact that this movement was misunderstood and judged either by a "conservative" man and abiding tradition as Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, Archbishop of Genoa, both by a figure known to be highly "progressive" like that of Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini Archbishop of Milan? Why Is That, in this Church who for five decades of blabbering proclaims himself "collegiality" and "collegiality", It was not taken into account that this movement was frowned upon since its inception by the majority of Italian bishops, who for many years, from various parts of the world, They came harsh protests from many bishops complained that the competent offices of the Holy See breaking actions, the personalities unacceptable, the lack of respect and pedagogical touch with the cultures of local people, but above all the great arrogance of these "chosen among the chosen" against the bishops and local clergy? . Those have just narrated thus far are made, little worth that mega-catechists justify everything accusing some bishops of being "closed to the Spirit", severe judgment which by the way does not compete with any Mr. Lay, which has neither the authority nor the necessary grace was to judge so severely for those who grace the sacrament has received the fullness of the apostolic priesthood, and visibly embodying for this, in his particular Church, the figure of Christ the Good Shepherd who holds all the living members of the ecclesial body. . VIII THE POPE reigning NOT DELAYED IN LAUNCH also ACCURATE TO CALLS KIKOS AND THE MEGA-CATECHISTS Neocatechumenal Way GETTING THE EFFECT OBTAINED BY ITS THREE PREDECESSORS: EARS FROM MERCHANT . To the Founders of this movement and their mega-catechists, They should have been imposed as a thorough study, a formative level, various documents of the supreme Magisterium, including the encyclical Faith and Reason the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II, because in a few steps, this text, indicates implicitly condemns so severe - obviously talking to all and without appeal to those directly affected - one of the basic errors which is the same structural basis of the Neocatechumenal, just read this one passage in which the Holy Pontiff says: . "They do not even miss the dangerous folds fideism, that does not recognize the importance of rational knowledge and philosophical discourse for the understanding of faith, indeed for the very possibility of belief in God. One currently widespread fideistic of this trend is the "Biblicism", which tends to make the reading of Scripture or its exegesis the only point of reference truthful. It so happens that identifies the word of God with the Holy Scriptures alone, thus negating the doctrine of the Church that the Second Vatican Council explicitly confirmed […] Other modes of latent fideism appear in the scant consideration accorded to speculative theology, and in disdain for the classical philosophy, which the terms of both the understanding of faith and the actual formulation of dogma have drawn on their terms " [Faith and Reason, n. 55] . A people "washed" and "grown" in sectarian forms of authoritarianism, to which the mega-catechists are imposed in practice of very invasive way and very authoritarian, based on the irrational and sull'emotivo, ie the worst principles of fideism a-critical and irrational, It is useless to offer gentle reminders loving destined to exert a unique effect: give the full impression that the Church visible and that the Ecclesiastical Authority are weak, thus legitimizing the Neocatechumenal to continue to do what they want and how they want. It is in this way that for half a century now, the visible Church and the Ecclesiastical Authority have seriously wrong with the Neocatechumenal: not frenandoli and not putting them in a row from the start. And this was a serious error is attributable to the Holy Pontiff Paul VI, both the Holy Father John Paul II. The Venerable Pope Benedict XVI and his successor Francesco I have just inherited - particularly the reigning Supreme Pontiff - a situation should develop in their two predecessors Saints until the true apotheosis of unwieldiness, place the Neocatechumenal was not only allowed to take root in hundreds of dioceses in the world, but what it is worse to open more than one hundred seminars, purpose of which it is to form Priests modeled on liturgical and doctrinal eccentricities of the Way, at the service of the Way did not diocesan bishops. . So I have explained in depth the complete uselessness the famous speech made by the Neocatechumenal Venerable Pope Benedict XVI 2012, When pointed out that the Church, through the Pontifical Council for the Laity, He approved the statutes of the duly corrected by the Holy See Movement, but not at all approve of their liturgical antics through the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, or through the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith approved in any way the unabated continuation of their catechesis heterodox. So, while the Pope played a loving and gentle foil, the greater of the state kikos He drove down throughout, but just about everything, the seal of the total approval of the Holy See, including liturgical abuses institutionalized, not the centrality of the mystery and the intense Eucharistic worship first and foremost as a bloodless sacrifice of the Passion of Christ is renewed in the memorial altar, heresies spread by mega-catechists and last but not least the formation of seminarians in which have large incidence of secular figures, Armed often of poor or sometimes worse wrong Catholic education, up in defiance to the fact that to form a future priest, practices are needed only ever only other priests of proven faith, spiritual maturity and upright conduct of life. . May the Divine Mercy then saved from the holy wrath of God all those bishops who continue to consecrate priests seminarians seminars mother of The Redeemer, He is hiding behind the finger of "... and what can I do?», although aware of creating an army of priests instructed to pay allegiance to the Movement, to support the Movement, to spread the Movement, to proselytize for the Movement, to encourage the wrong perception of the priesthood and the confusion between the common priesthood and the ministerial priesthood, instilling in these seminarians incorrect liturgical practices and erroneous doctrinal practices that still pervade and characterize the Neocatechumenal Movement. . I do not even open the long, complex and painful speech than today, Holy Mother Church, tends to be very little loving and merciful to those suffering from the terrible filth poured upon the Holy Bride of Christ; or at the Holy Mother Church has reversed severity, hardness and shunned all sorts of those who have tried to defend the truth from error, for example pointing out that it is our mission on the straight divine appointment by the always accoglier the repentant sinner, especially when sins are particularly serious, being right in the soul these sick who need a physician [cf. Mt 9, 12], because the Lord Christ came to earth to call them sinners, not the right [MC 2, 17]. Totally different - as it unfortunately is happening -, if unworthy shepherds, irresponsible and very dangerous, instead they put to accept not the sinner, but the sin, up to call sin "diversity that enriches" or so-called 'includenza element'. . While the general staff of the kikos and the host of the mega-catechists they continue to lie by passing all their liturgical abuses and their heterodoxies doctrinaire as approved by the Church, the Pope Francis I, since the first hearings in which he received them, He did not fail to reproach them for several times. From 2014 he drew the Neocatechumenal on three specific points. First of all, the clearly he stated: . «[…] sometimes it may be better not to live in all the details what your itinerary would demand, in order to ensure unity among the brothers who form the only ecclesial communities, which you must always feel part '. . Then he called them to respect local cultures towards which always, i Neocatecumenali, not only show little interest but sometimes even contempt, so much their closed sectarianism causes them to entrench and wherever impose liturgical aberrations, catechisms and their questionable Community: . «[…] from this springs the need for special attention to the cultural context in which families you go to work: it is an environment that is often very different from what you came from '. . Finally a clear reference what concerns the freedom of its followers, or to be more clear and correct their sectarian: . "The freedom of each must not be forced, and you must also respect the eventual choice of those who decide to seek, Way out, other forms of Christian life to help him grow in response to the Lord's call " [1February 2014, Audience to the families of Neucatecumenale Way, full text, WHO]. . Needless to say that on this occasion, from the Chamber Paul VI, while before this clear and precise reproach, the state of greater Neocatecumenali, with their priests reduced to largely Ministers in sacris "Puppet" under the orders of the mega-lay catechists, They are gone out from the papal reiterating that hearing as ever: "The Church has approved it in every way!». . The Pope Francis I is a Jesuit education and it comes from a very specific socio-psychological context linked to the culture of a specific country in the Latin American Continent. Wanting to be clear again we could say that he belongs to a way of thinking and acting very specific to a particular social environment of Buenos Aires Capital. From this it follows that the Pope has for cultural and linguistic style a way of expression through which you usually treat the most serious problems, then launch then its most severe rebukes, just as with sweet air he makes use of jokes, like when during a meeting with the Neocatechumenal 2015 stated: . «[…] confirm your call, I support your mission and bless your charisma. I do this not because he [Ed. Kiko Argüello indicates] He paid me, No! I do it because I want to do ' [cf. 2 March 2015, full speech WHO, video WHO]. . We analyze the phrase: Perhaps hath it has been a joke for its own sake? Of course not, anything! The Pope is well aware that the Neocatechumenal Way provides and manages huge sums of money, for which he could steal, species in certain mission areas, the whole diocese, where they have guaranteed: the financial support of the parishes, the opening and maintenance of a seminar, the livelihood of priests. All with a sad and obvious consequence: some dioceses today can not do without the Neocatechumenal, then bishops and pastors, like it or not they, They must obey the instructions issued by Kiko Argüello through the "armed wing" of his mega-catechists. This is the meaning of the bar of the Supreme Pontiff, who then uproar in 2018 adding that Christ the Lord: . "Send: "Go". It does not use half measures. It authorizes reduced trips or trips reimbursed, but he says to his disciples, to all his disciples one word: "Go!”» [cf. 5 May 2018, Holy Father's Address to Neocatechumenal, full text, WHO]. . They will perhaps missed numerous apostolic nuncios of the Holy See various countries around the world, including those serving in the apostolic nunciature of poor countries, who informed the Supreme Pontiff to have seen come from Neocatechumenal families with many children in tow, who have spent a hundred thousand or two hundred thousand Euros only tickets for round-trip travel? Or that these zealous evangelizers are then returned home after a few months, with aura from great missionaries, without having learned to say, in that Asian or African language, even "hello" and "good evening"? Not to mention the living expenses, because when you are sectarians is also very intimate nature provincial, here then imported Italian food bought at a very high cost in international shops of the place, if not made by mail arriving from Italy, because without noodles or without coffee, or without the snacks of Italian companies for the kids, if you do not fall into a crisis of faith, it falls at least in food crisis. And things like that have been well documented by many apostolic nuncios of the Holy See's diplomatic service in various countries around the world, especially those of poor countries in Asia or Africa. . And while again rose the cry of ritual: "The Church has approved it!», someone, between duly "washed" in the brain by mega-catechists, only vaguely understood what the very serious and above all very severe told all of them the Supreme Pontiff with those words? . IX Neocatechumenals ARE THE DENIAL OF WISE SPIRIT MISSIONARY CHURCH, ED INSTEAD BRING NEW PEOPLE MAKE THE CATHOLICISM IN NEW ADEPTS NEOCATECUMENALESIMO . Also in earlier called speech of May 2018 the Supreme Pontiff, touching the spirit of mission and respect the culture of peoples, continues to warn in these terms the Neocatechumenals: . "Risen Jesus says: "Make disciples”. This is the mission. Does not say: won, occupied, but "make disciples", that you share with others the gift you received, the love meeting that changed you life […] Do you love the culture and traditions of peoples, without applying pre-designed templates. Do not leave the theories and drawings, but from practical situations: so the Spirit will shape the announcement that its time and its ways. And the Church will grow in his image: united in its diversity of peoples, the gifts and charisms ". . On these words of the Pope we clarify another point: People send in so-called mission formed and deformed like the Neocatechumenal, and in a very special way in certain sensitive parts of the world, is equivalent to putting a drunken elephant walking inside a factory in which you create delicate glassware blown glass. Indeed, the Neocatechumenal personal delegate of the Holy Spirit and by the particularly inspired, It must first bring himself, but above all to impose himself. . Since this is a movement that lives permeated by fideism, and it benefited from a Holy Spirit that blows everything about them - and also how they want them -, They are far from having the humility to learn from the wise great missionary history of the Church and the large and well-established tradition of the ancient missionary religious orders. The so-called missionary Neucatecumenale, It has no need to engage in their own country of origin, if anything for a few years of careful and profound study, first of all to know the language, then uses, the customs and traditions of the country and the people to whom they will have to go far from fasting and naive, with all the problems and damage that it can cause otherwise. These are things that were in the sixteenth and seventeenth century missionaries of the antiquated and obtuse old Tridentine, when the Holy Spirit - according to the sacred word of Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández - had always "kept imprisoned in a sealed bottle», all since the time of Constantine Peace. Therefore, the first Jesuits trained personally by St. Ignatius of Loyola, before leaving for the missions they lost time studying languages in Rome, the uses and customs of the ancient peoples of the East. What completely understandable, the reason why they lose precious time for the like: but because they were not filled with the Holy Spirit! They were not their, Jesuit missionaries formed by Ignatius Loyola, as it was at that time the great army of missionaries Dominicans and Franciscans who have entire continents evangelized. And, thanks to them, Today many large cities of the Americas New, still carry the names of their founders, or of the Blessed Virgin Mary which were particularly devout: San Francisco de Assisi, Santa Maria de Los Angeles, or the island of Santo Domingo de Guzmán and so to follow. Or maybe someone thinks that the American city of Corpus Christi, in the State of Texas, takes its name from the ancient traditions of the natives of the place? . The Neocatechumenal has everything: He has the Holy Spirit, so has not to learn from anyone. He did not learn from history, because he has a story, which it is the only story that could constitute valid reference point along with his emotion. Least of all have to learn the Catechism of the Catholic Church, because evangelization is made with the catechisms of the Movement. The consequences have been so disastrous, What they should know and understand very well and in all the details at the Congregation Propaganda Fide. Or to clarify, when Neocatechumenal, in various parts of the world, evangelized, the consequences were then these: when those newly baptized were later found in contact with other Catholic priests, with other Catholics, or when they approached other Catholic contexts, starting from liturgical celebrations, They have not recognized the "church" which had been converted and in which they had lived up to the first. And it's all to say the least understood: In fact, they had converted to Catholicism but not to Neocatecumenalesimo. That being said it is also clear that the Neocatechumenals, when they are distant from Rome and its neighboring regions, where while doing what they want, however, they feel under a certain control or at least below a certain minimum observation, when you are rather uncontrolled and totally in jeopardy in some mission countries, in that case they bring out the best of the worst of their doctrines and their individual liturgies and distorted almost frenzied. It follows then serious - as I said before -, the converts will not be placed before the universal dimension and therefore uniquely Catholic doctrine and liturgy which is you culmen background the life of the Church, but will be converted to Catholicism through liturgical abuses of Neocatecumenali rendered further serious by the fact that, lying at a distance from each possible control, they really gave the best of the worst that could give. . All this has been repeatedly reported over the years to the Holy See by numerous letters and reports, often accompanied by photographic documents and filmic, written by missionary bishops of the diocese who complained, often in very desperate tone, the devastating pseudo-missionary work put in place by these people, deploring forward to all that the Neocatechumenal purpose was not to baptize more people, but to 'convert' new followers to their movement. And many of these bishops, being in Rome visiting limina visit They took advantage to bring in person news, information and above all their complaints to the Holy See. . In this way we have allowed it to happen in modernity what serious has happened in antiquity in times when, different peoples of the North of Europe, when between the fourth and fifth centuries they began to convert to Christianity, in truth they converted instead to Arianism, because they were the Aryans first to bring, at those people, a corrupt Christian faith from heresy heresiarch Arius [Libya 256 – Constantinople 336]. . Continuing the reference made by the Pope in May 2018, let's step back to touch another topic related to the activity of neocatecumenalizzatori missionaries in Russia, because before certain events may arise somewhat understandable suspicion, or so-called legitimate suspicion. It is in fact happened was that after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union, in Russia they have returned to life Catholics and the Catholic Church, all in a situation of extreme delicacy, which I am not allowed, as you should well understand, drunken elephants that move at walking inside a factory in which you create delicate glassware blown glass. . As a courtesy, Pope John Paul II, he was invited to Moscow by both Mikhail Gorbachev during his historic visit to the Vatican on 1 December 1989, is subsequently by Boris in Eltis 1991. Needless to say, never the Supreme Pontiff would irritate the Moscow Orthodox Patriarchate, he never failed to complain on several occasions the missionary impulse to Russia, that from the Catholic point of view was precisely missionary, while from different point of view of the Orthodox Church it was considered rather proselytizing action. And so, the highest leaders of the Orthodox Church, between the 1990 and the 2000 They complained about the arrival in the country of "some particularly intrusive Catholic groups and not respectful of the culture and religious traditions of the ancient Russian people". Intrusiveness rendered so by lack of respect and understanding, first performed without regard to the statements later by President Vladimir Putin: "Christianity embodied by the Orthodox Church is the root of the identity of the Russian people" [speech 23 July 2018]. It is not by chance, when he tried to fear again a possible trip of the reigning Pontiff in Russia, He died directly on the intention feared. Indeed, unlike his two predecessors, when President Vladimir Putin went on an official visit to the Roman Pontiff in 2013 and later in 2015, not formulated as its predecessors the invitation to the Pope to visit Russia, no meaning at all, like its predecessors, irritate the Moscow Orthodox Patriarchate. Note also that the President of the Russian Federal Republic came the first time in the Vatican, in 2013, with fifty minutes late, the second time, in 2015, with a delay of over an hour. And, as you should know - if there were more diplomatic of race - in diplomacy is measured around, Also the silent language of minutes late. . In view of the complaints of the Moscow Patriarchate tested reported, perhaps it is legitimate to ask: such as these would be "particularly intrusive Catholic groups and not respectful of the culture and religious traditions of the ancient Russian people"? Because of the various Catholic movements, what features of these special characteristics, the proof of facts would seem to be the one founded by Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández. Obviously we do not know who it was referring the generic complaints of the Moscow Patriarchate; But we know that the Neocatechumenal Way is present in Russia with its itinerant catechists from the early nineties of the twentieth century and that one of these catechists prominent was for twenty-five years Mrs. María Ascension Romero, that after the death Carmen Hernández took his place at the top of the leadership of the Movement [cf. WHO].. . X THE Neocatechumenal Way IS A PSYCHO-SECT IN WHICH YOU CANCEL THE MEANING CRITICAL AFTER INVADED THE CONSCIENCE OF ADEPTS AND CHANGING THE crass ignorance AND PRIDE IN A GIFT OF ELECTION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT . A character of members of psycho-sects, is that of being induced to doze off completely every human and natural critical sense, Therefore every word is always distorted and rigor, then read and interpreted in favor and benefit of the sect. That's why specialists in psychiatric sciences who work to de-psychological programming of the people who have been deformed over time from various psycho-sects, the first thing they do is to destroy all their idols and especially invisible visible, with that mode of practice should always be authoritarian and aggressive, because only by creating states of shock it will be possible to induce gradually the former sectarians to reason. A job, this, that the specialists can confirm always it lasts many years; and it is said that the results can be, at the end, always positive. . The Neocatechumenal are the product of a misconstrued Spirit Spring, during which the visible Church has dangerously abuse the word "dialogue", soon turned into a dialogue at any cost and at any cost. Thus, even before serious errors and very dangerous, what mattered, It was not to separate the real from the fake or authentic doctrine from heresy, but dialogue ... dialogue … converse. . When the Holy Pontiff Paul VI finally he came to say: "With the Second Vatican Council we expected spring and instead came the winter", Unfortunately the damage was already done; and many of these damages, with the passage of time, They proved irreparable, when the Ecclesiastical Authority has continued unabated to talk ... talk ... talk ... And while the house on fire is now under the eyes of all, firemen do not intervene, perhaps believing the Church what little visible charitable and not merciful, extinguish with strong holy water gettiti that fire that is no longer "Satan in God's temple smoke" alluded to the Holy Pontiff Paul VI [speech 29 June 1972, original text, WHO]», because today, that smoke, It has changed in a fire. . that's how, Why and what are born Neocatechumenal, and that is why were able to move forward and become a true church within the Church. All this was made possible by the fall of the principle of authority in the Church, instead of which he was born: on the one hand authoritarianism of certain Authority Ecclesiastical acting in open defiance to all canonical laws applying the worst of their own free will, on the other hand they were born mega-catechists of the Neocatechumenal Way which have relegated the priest in the corner to make nodded his head while the mega-catechist spreads all sorts of heresy among the People of God. . Faith is also and not least culture, a demonstration of the production of the great Fathers and Doctors of the Church; the Holy Spirit illuminates the man with their gifts of God's grace through the wisdom and knowledge. The close and inseparable relationship between faith and culture is first demonstrated by the editors of the Holy Gospels and the Apostolic Letters. And if we want to talk about high inspiration of the Holy Spirit, in that case we can not take anthologies of heretical catechesis of the Founders of the Neocatechumenal Way, but many other kinds of texts, through them to explain what it really is divine inspiration. And because the password that runs always been among the Neocatechumenate is the cry of 'back to basics', Well let's go right to the apostolic origins to talk, starting right from them, the mystery of the Holy Spirit. . A human mind could possibly conceive, and an equally human hand could perhaps write, a work of faith as the Prologue to the Gospel of the Apostle John Beato? [cf. GV 1, 1-18]. And just as the human mind, and an equally human hand could possibly build in a few short lines the entire system Christological dogma set by the Blessed Apostle Paul in the opening of the Letter to the inhabitants of Colossi? [With the 1, 12-20]. Could the human mind and the human hand of the Blessed Apostle Paul write the Christological hymn contained in the Letter to the inhabitants of Philippi? [cf. Within 2, 6-11]. What other human mind could possibly conceive, and an equally human hand could perhaps write, work such as the Letter to the Hebrews? . We may follow up with many of the Fathers of the Church, always those of so-called "origins", from St. Irenaeus who planted solid roots of pneumatology doctrine with his first treatises on the Holy Spirit. We explained everything so we can come to tell you something that only totally devoid of understanding individuals can be denied: science, the knowledge and culture are an integral part of the mystery of faith, for as sure as that faith comes from the knowledge and certainly not from ignorance. The suffering from so-called invincible ignorance, may be admitted among the Anime Beate much earlier and much more than many wise, because of the purity of their hearts and their faith, at least according to the words spoken by the Blessed Virgin Mary in the song of Magnificat: "He has put down the mighty from their thrones, He has exalted the lowly ". But, at the same time, there instead of that fear seriously and so much to pray for those who, while suffering from invincible ignorance, manifesting anything but saving faith and purity of heart, not better to do than to despise the men of God to which the Divine Majesty has given special gifts of wisdom that brought them to mature science that guides Christi fideles the deepest mysteries along the path of faith. . Or rather clarify AGAIN: Catherine of Siena, a young illiterate illiterate, It became Santa, and he was later proclaimed a Doctor of the Church, because thanks to his humility, which it is the largest door opening to God's grace, the Holy Spirit has bestowed on her the most profound wisdom, even if he did not even read and write. That's why the Popes have not listened to the young Caterina Benincasa, now known as St. Catherine of Siena. They have instead listened to none Carmen Hernandez, equipped with a superb arrogance beyond any reasonable measure. In fact, as previously narrated, she interrupted several times the Successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter as he spoke. And the Roman Pontiff, Far from that listening lend lent by his predecessors to the Supreme young Sienese illiterate and illiterate, I scolded the words of the Apostle Paul Blessed: "The silent woman!». All this to return to repeat the measurement of the people we're talking about and the phenomenon generated by the same, within which they infused the worst vices and errors, unlike the Saints who have left imprinted in their works rather the sign of the fruits of God's grace, even in works, in religious orders and congregations subsequently forfeited. . In this regard it would be enough to think about what are the gifts of the Holy Spirit, that are not listed at random, but put in a precise order: wisdom, intellect, advice, fortress, science, pity, fear of God. Having said that we now turn to a brief catechesis to the mega-catechists of the Neocatechumenal Way of these wonderful gifts, because I think we have really needed. . We start from the gift of Wisdom which it is a real divine attribute infused by the Holy Spirit in man. It is in fact through the wisdom - as taught by St. Thomas Aquinas - which can be seen, therefore live supernatural things from God's point of view. Simply said that if there is no wisdom, the other gifts will not hold up, because they are inseparable from each other. . The gift It makes it possible to understand the truths of faith by opening the soul a complete vision of the reality of the divine dimension. Therefore, if faith is the adherence to the mystery of revelation, through the gift we can rise to much higher level of understanding; until reaching an understanding that is not only rational, but above all deeply intuitive. . The gift of counsel We could also indicate as "gift opening". Through the gifts of wisdom and intellect, It opens the mind to God and conscience to the man's tension with the right moral choices. . The gift of fortitude by itself is the negation of what may be the man governed by moodiness, by feelings and fatuous sentimentality, that drive one way and another outside of the divine mysteries, or the alteration of the mystery of revelation. Being strong does not mean being put up internally and externally not to be influenced by the instinct and emotion, It resisting so decided to internal and external errors that can suffocate civil society and the ecclesial community. . The gift of knowledge It is based on knowledge. To know we must, however, be docile and humble, because humility and docility to learning are the foundation of genuine science. Otherwise it reaches what today is called self-referentiality through the way of personalism, that egocentrism and that of the closure towards the outside and towards the other. Science, Christian Understanding, proceeds through the opening, which is then open to the action of the grace of God it manifested in this case by many saints and wise teachings masters. . The gift of piety It is the negation of what pietism that will take place in the seventeenth century by the Protestant pietism. Pity characterizes the believer's relationship with God and leads him to wish for himself and for others what God desires in the highest good, coming to such an intimacy of faith and love with the Creator to the point that the creature turns to him as "Father". From pity then it creates a feeling of deep affection and great respect for the man, which it reflects the mystery of God who made us in his image and likeness. . The gift of fear of God He has nothing to do with fear, on the contrary: It is the negation of all fears. This wonderful gift we can sum it up with a quote Christological Hymn of the little Blessed Apostle Paul called before: "In the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven, on earth and under the earth " [Within 2, 10]. . After this short excursus you could start by the end saying for example that the Neocatechumenal, so stubborn and obtuse, following the erroneous teachings of their Founders and the "armed wing" of the mega-catechists, they abolished and prohibited genuflections and signs of adoration hiding these forms of their authentic and superb irreverence behind a vague theology kikiana the risen Christ, then of "being in the position" of the Risen. . Inside of of this movement the Holy Spirit, and his gifts, They are a cross between a magic wand and a wizard of the formula "Abra Cadabra»With which it is justified and makes up for the lack of institutionalized wisdom, intellect, advice, fortress, science, pity, fear of God. . We summarize it all with just one example: within this Movement, unlike many other lay movements, no swarming all people or culture or science. Nor could it be otherwise, view and considered the epic cultural and theological ignorance shown in the course of both their lives by their respective Founders. Here then is that the Neocatechumenal Way, a worthy person who has spent his entire life on the scaffold to make that useful and noble profession which is the mason, suddenly he descends from them, and with the appointment mega-catechist is invested with all the power of the Spirit. As if ever, St. Thomas Aquinas and many other holy Fathers and Doctors of the Church before and after him, He explained that the grace of the Holy Spirit perfects nature present in humans, but it does not replace all those that can be small or serious deficiencies that are present in that human nature, including the lack of intelligence and culture. That said, to worthy mason it is also necessary to add the element of human frustration associated for example at all times that with orders, sometimes with reproaches made during the execution of the work, some civil design engineer, rather than twenty years younger than him, She recalled him telling him what to do precise and exact manner in which he had to. Now, if the builder was careful not to move from protest to foreman Engineer, also carefully avoiding to invite other workers to do as he put it instead as the designer said, once you become mega-catechist of the Way does not, however scruple to move toughest disputes, or to stage real rebellions of the group led by him against a senior and experienced pastor. Or pouring scorn on a theologian who has decided to act strictly doctrinal and legal arguments to explain everything you need light of wisdom and knowledge that, by talk of mega-catechist, protruding dangerous heresies bagful infecting with serious errors adepts who were listening to him and following him. . Unfortunately there have been repeated cases in which this kind of mega-catechists, freshly fallen from the scaffolding or other more or less similar places, they began disrupting the bishop of the diocese while they spoke before their Christi fideles and affirming the presence of all: "I disagree, because I do not agree with what the bishop is saying ", which bishop was holding at a meeting on issues related to the economy of the diocese, But he was talking about specific subjects closely related to matters of doctrine and faith; topics for which the bishop, guardian of doctrine and faith in his particular Church, It is a sacrament of the supreme master of grace. . Needless to say: these people have always and reason practices because they refer to their idea kikiana of preaching [kerygma] but above all to the fact that the Holy Spirit speaks through them. And their personal Holy Spirit leads them not only severely lacking education to the Pastors of the Church, but if necessary would induce them even to scold, subtly wage war and despise the same Pastors of the Church who reject their serious errors, because their structural parallel is as follows: if waste me, waste the Holy Spirit. . Another feature of the psycho-seven has its own terminology, which serves as a part to unite the members of the so-called clan closed, the other, to isolate them from the outside. That said, I must say that the information that more reliable to me dates from High Prelates who over the years have had to deal with the founders of the Movement on behalf of the dicasteries of the Holy See, often with pain and they do not procacciandosi few humiliations, I was detailed that both, Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez, are actually two "clumsy self-taught having a confused cultural smattering that came not even to be called average, but in fact and lower middle reasonably '. So, Kiko Argüello who likes to use some term magic greek effect, followed by equally Hebrew terms magic and impressive, just put under the eyes of a Holy Gospels text in greek and ask: "We do not pretend that she translates them there, we are content just to read four lines in greek ». After that, since he peppered "his" liturgies and "his" places of worship biblicismi bizarre and Jewish symbols, you could invite him to a synagogue and ask to the most excellent Doctor, Rabbi, extract between ספרים [Sepharim, Scrolls of the Law] un bel Torah [Sefer Torah, Roll of the Law] and ask it to the founder of the Neocatechumenal Way and the only simple reading of twelve words in Hebrew; just twelve, Twelve is also the Tribes of Israel. Of course: simply recited, without having to sing with meter Sephardic or Ashkenazi. Certain, it would be very nice if in a Jewish-Christian encounter good Arguello There deliziasse singing with his guitar יגדל אלוהים חי [The Thirteen Articles of Faith by Maimonides, video WHO], or the other beautiful hymn synagogue אֲדוֹן עוֹלָם [Hymn to the Lord of the Universe, video, WHO], if anything, with the meter of Sephardic song which arises precisely in its ספרד, namely Sefarad, the Iberian Peninsula. Not enough to cram with kikiano exotic spirit of the liturgy pseudo or quasi-Catholic of Jewish symbolism inopportune misplaced. Nor enough that people actually highly illiterate both in biblical sciences in the ancient traditions of rabbinic Judaism, during the Eucharistic celebrations is put to dance and fiddle 'Kshlom», «Dayenu"And so on. Therefore it is necessary, as well as consistent and serious, the Neocatechumenal, thirsty ancient Jewish origins and ancient apostolic origins, Prendano i arrangements [siddurim Jewish, prayer books] and campaigning on singing, articulating with the correct pronunciation synagogal songs from them inserted in the liturgies pseudo and para-Catholic, starting from this beautiful hymn: . Lord of eternity Asr Mlc Btrm Cl Itzir Nbra For the time Nash Bhftzo Cl Azi king of Smo Nkra And Ahri Cclot everybody Lbdo Imloc awful Opening he was upon a time opening he was nonce And the opening he Ihih Btfarh Lhmsil to him Lhhbirh Excluding inception except for perfection And Lo Haz and Hmsrh And the opening he Ellie and Hi Goali And Tzor Hbli Bat trouble And the opening he Nsi and Mnos me Portion tot leaving on Akra His afkid mind During ment uoeirh And Am Rohi Goiti Adni me and La Aira . Let it be noted that the Founders of the Neocatechumenal Way, since their first catechesis, have always treated with contempt the Tridentine liturgy celebrated in Latin. Both, educating their mega-catechists, the liturgy celebrated in Latin always given a false idea and especially grotesque, as explained in the seventies of the twentieth century in Rome in the crypt of the church of Canadian Martyrs the two samples in question stating that: "The People was passive and aloof, while the priest whispered a language unknown, while the old ladies mumbled the Rosary ". Nothing further from the truth, because even the most illiterate and illiterate people knew exactly what it meant: «the Lord be with you», «Lift up your hearts», «Behold the Lamb of God» … And while on the one hand, with historical ignorance really scary but typical of the two persons in question, It spreads the disregard for a liturgy through which, from the sixteenth to the twentieth century they have been evangelized, converted and baptized peoples of entire continents, Founders of the Neocatechumenal Way filled their liturgies personalistic, exotic and often sacrilegious, with symbolism and Hebrew words. Question: but if the people, and especially those from Latin strain languages and cultures, they say they so difficult to understand the abstruse Latin, perhaps they are able to understand perfectly the ancient Biblical Hebrew? Not enough at all, take two or three words “exotic” and let people yell "Dayenu, Diane!», you have to take that song and sing it in full as it is according to the ancient tradition, because so should those who claim the return to the pure sources. Otherwise, the Neocatechumenal likely to make a much worse end of the "old ladies" on which the two ironizzavano their Founders, and instead of mumbling "Pray for us» e «Miserere nobis"The silence of the" Tridentine gloomy churches " who for sixteen centuries "they had closed and sealed the Holy Spirit in a bottle ', in the same way, on the contrary, in the very worst way, they are likely to scream and dance "Dayenu!», without being able, Hymn דַּיֵּנוּ [Dayenu] to read and understand even the first two lines: . These hutsyonu Egypt Not Ash Bhm Sftim your (etc…) . The psycho-seven, while despising all forms of religious life, starting from the oldest that still remain as great wealth within the Catholic Church, I usually make use of their typical neologisms. All this with a difference, for instance: if the Carthusian monks have created the word "spacing" used to indicate their walk outdoors, When once a week they are together a few hours and turn word, it did not give life or to have its own language or to create a form of lack of communication with the world, but only to define this costume that is born precisely from the range together outdoors can as a rule once a week. Quite another thing if it affiliated to the dangerous psycho-sect of Scientology is expressed in these terms: «In preclear I did auditing for 'Arc and there was a August fluctuating on 'e-meter in respect of past engram». Nor are we wasting time to explain the meaning of these terms abstruse born from the twisted mind of failed science fiction writer Ron Hubbard [1911-1986] that this organization lived in an international court and the other - including the founder who lived before he died in international waters because they wanted by police in eighteen different countries -, It presented itself initially as a way for the New Mental Health, said first and foremost a astruso own lexicon, aimed to isolate their followers from all that was external to it. . With a different style but with the same underlying substance, Founders of the Neocatechumenal Way have drawn various magic words from Hebrew and greek lexicon; no matter how much evidence exists that one or the other did not know at all neither the Jewish nor the Greek philology, what mattered was the Magic, the followers to impress with pompous words. These words were then given different meanings and new, by adding to the whole number of other terminologies that are typical ways to express themselves, to define and indicate. Words original - or if we want new words created by the claimant on the other hand the oldest back to unspecified and especially not better known origins - targeted primarily to fascinate newcomers and to transmit to them a sense of originality, exclusivity and above election. And in the Church, unfortunately, it seems that nobody noticed, for several decades, that was developing internally, increasing branching and psycho-sect in style. . The Church, in his time of great weakness, afflicted by a large and dramatic crisis of authority, allowed many individual fragility and existential frustrations harbored behind a false Pneumatology and many superb animated by ignorance is mettessero playing with the mystery of the Holy Spirit. Under the eyes of the Ecclesiastical Authority did helpless and powerless, we have seen the rise of a movement that in terms of the doctrine of the faith has become dangerously destructive that immediately went to hit two elements that make up the heart and lungs, respectively, of the Holy Church of Christ: the Holy Eucharist and the ministerial priesthood. This sad, bleak and dangerous reality: it is allowed, for half a century in this part, that a real metastases from attacking the heart that is beating and lungs that make breathing body of the Church, meanwhile always talking ... talking ... talking and hoping at the same time that the cancer he cared and defeating himself, without any oncologist he would intervene with therapies decided and radical. . XI THE SERIOUS PROBLEM OF WRONG PERCEPTION OF THE MOST HOLY EUCHARIST JOINS THE WRONG PERCEPTION OF PRIESTHOOD, SPECIES BETWEEN THE PRIESTHOOD BATTEZZATI COMMON AND MINISTERIAL PRIESTHOOD OF CHRIST TO WHICH ONLY PART I MINISTERS IN SACRIS EQUIPPED WITH A EXHIBITION TRIPLE: TEACHING, Governing, SANCTIFYING . Empirical evidence shows The Neocatechumenal Way is thus the most comprehensive paradigm of immense confusion and alteration of roles created by para-council and then diffused from the post-council, namely clericalization of the laity and the secularization of Ministers in sacris. Or to quote the words Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation The lay of 1988: . "In the same Synod Assembly, however, there have been, along with those positive, too critical judgments about the indiscriminate use of the term "ministry", confusion and sometimes leveling between the common priesthood and the ministerial priesthood, the lack of observance of ecclesiastical laws and norms, the arbitrary interpretation of the concept of "supplementary", the tendency to "clericalization" of the lay faithful and the risk of creating a de facto parallel ecclesial structure of service to that founded on the Sacrament of Orders " [cf. n. 23, full text, WHO]. . How many priests me too, coming in contact with various prominent members of the Neocatechumenal Way, from which I soon decided to keep me cautiously away, I was deeply impressed by the invasive and tend to arrogantly expressed towards the priestly figure of those who have shown during this exhibition like the mega-catechists several times. All the more reason I say: Holy Church, allowing this lay movement to open more than one hundred seminars around the world, in the illusion that these training institutions to the priesthood may be the bishop diocesan seminaries that form the priests the bishop, He has made a very serious action and reckless. Inside of of these workshops, indeed formed entities that tomorrow will be priests of the Neocatechumenal Movement, but especially, more than priests the bishop, They will be priests of Kiko Argüello and its mega-catechists. . I really am sorry to narrate but a decade ago, in that of Castel Gandolfo, where I was to preach and celebrate Mass at a religious institute, with one of these mega-catechists almost came to blows. Perhaps it is shameful to narrate by a priest, but if other people had occurred - which still thank you - I would have sidelined shortly thereafter hands on him to really, certainly making quite ill. Never as in this occasion I felt I was in fact deeply despised and disrespected as a priest of Christ and his Holy Church. And please pay attention: I did not say that I felt as a man despised, What I could accept taking the whole thing as sanctifying mortification and reciting all the following Litany of Humility made by the Servant of God Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val [cf. text, WHO]; I said that I felt humiliated as a priest, and most of the lay faithful. And this is not readily acceptable, because the priesthood, that does not belong to me and none of my brothers and none of us can be said to be worthy, is a dignity that comes from the sacramental grace and like every sacrament must be protected and safeguarded, if necessary, even at the cost of life itself. . This is the story of the fact that now I give you all truthful testimony: the mega-catechist in question, following the teachings received, first he expressed a resounding Christological heresy comparing the Son to a "creature of God fell from the sky with the gift of prophecy". This is where you should incidentally point out that defining Christ "creature", that is created, instead of consubstantial "Begotten not made of the same substance as the Father" [the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed], It is the first of the largest and insidious heresies, known as Arianism, condemned in 325 by the Council of Nicea. Appresso continued with a couple of heresies pneumatological proving to have an idea of the Holy Spirit to say the least magica, at last, ranting about Divine Child and the Divine Holy Spirit, He showed to have no clear what was the mystery of the Holy Trinity. But mostly it fell in the enunciation of the old heresy Modalist, mainly diffused by Noetus of Smyrna and also referred to as monarchianism Modalist, which experienced its development between the second and third centuries and was fought by the great philosopher and Christian apologist Tertullian. Thinking of so highly inspired to say something to his mind from his staff and magic Holy Spirit, He enunciated that "the figures of the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit were three different ways in which the one God is manifested to men". And from that Modalist slid so millennial heresy - or heresy Joachim -, saying that "after the era of the figure of the Father, that characterized the Old Testament, and hereinafter referred to as the figure of the Son, following the Second Vatican Council was born the era of the Holy Spirit ". I admit that I had not ever heard, in so few minutes Space, such a miscellany of heresies. So I thought within myself: the fact that the mega-catechists Neocatechumenal always use magic words like the concept of 'back to basics', in this, as in other practical situations, is likely to bring them back, than to the apostolic origins, the origins of the oldest heresies return. . I could take it back in front of everyone, because what medley heretic had tumbler before an audience made up of about thirty people, indeed it would be my duty to say to them: It is in grave error, do not follow his words completely wrong, because something else is the deposit of faith and something else teaches the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I did not, preferring the private fraternal admonition; so I called him by making him fast catechism. A quel point, when I finished the explanation saying "... these are the dogmas of our Holy Faith", with a truly devilish arrogance he interrupted me and said,: "... and it felt! Dogma dogmas ... ... you see that you're an old-fashioned priest pre-conciliar, I had understood instantly. What counts is the kerygma, everything else is archaeological stuff ». After this he said more mocking than ever: "See to fill you!». . A thirty-two mega-catechist that caters well to a priest never seen before, walking time to the exhibition, calling him a "you" as if I were a seminaretto their multinational Seminars mother of The Redeemer, it is certainly not the best of good manners and respect due to a faithful Catholic to a priest. I do not, however, lingered on this, but I reminded him instead, in a very pleasing manner, I had been ordained a priest, and that besides being a priest I was also trained by masters saints as a lawyer, philosopher, sacramentary dogmatic theologian and historian of dogma, therefore, given its young age, for the one and the other thing he could take me at least a modicum of respect. This was his textual response: . "I think you've studied theology evil, because if you had studied should know that the Second Vatican Council said that we are all priests ". . Here we come to the biggest pitfall flavor Lutheran permeating the Neocatechumenal Way in the name of a never written by the Council which takes lives failure to correct perception of the priesthood. It is indeed the Second Vatican Council says in its documents and solemnly reaffirms that there are two priesthoods: the common priesthood of all the baptized [Lumen Gentium, NN. 9-17], and the ministerial or hierarchical priesthood, which is participating in the ministerial priesthood of Christ, which comes to share in the mystery of grace only Ministers in sacris, those who through the sacrament of the grace of Holy priests were consecrated [cf. Lumen Gentium, NN. 18-29]. It is also the same Second Vatican Council which clarifies well and without equivocation worth what the Church is the role of the laity and their docile subordinate to Pastors called to feed the flock [cf. Lumen Gentium, NN. 30-38]. The Second Vatican Council has also published a document dedicated to the life and ministry of priests and the priestly ministry, in which are indicated: . "Exercising the office of Christ the Head and Shepherd for the part of authority is theirs, Priests, in the name of Bishop, gather the family of God as a living brotherhood and united and lead to the Father through Christ in the Holy Spirit. For this ministry, as well as for other functions, It is given to a spiritual power presbyter, which is in fact granted for the purposes of edification. In building the Church, priests must treat all with the relations marked by kindness in, following the example of the Lord. And in dealing with men do not adjust according to their tastes but according to the demands of Christian doctrine and life, teach them and admonish them as beloved sons, according to the words: "Urgent in season and out of season: reproaches, supplication, encourage through all patience and doctrine '' (2 TM 4,2) [1965, Priesthood, n. 6]. . The Second Vatican Council is followed by a decree on the Pastoral Mission of Bishops in the Church [1965, Christ the Lord]. At last, always in the context of those years, It was promulgated an encyclical of the Holy Pope Paul VI on the doctrine and worship of the Holy Eucharist [1965, Mysterium Fidei], we can also assume that the founders of the Neocatechumenal Way and the "armed wing" of their mega-catechists have no right ever read, seen and tried the undaunted way you insist on treating, the Most Holy Eucharist. . Needless to say, since it should be obvious: The priest is not a man who has acquired one status which makes it superior to Christi fideles, but it is called to be a loving father and devoted servant of God's People, giving it first instance with his spirit of service. Thus, in the post-conciliar, follow other Church documents that put in perspective the figure of the priest and of his sacred ministry, if it considers that it was in jeopardy, since the beginning of the seventies of the twentieth century, both by certain theologies clumsy both heretical thoughts, just like those released by the Founders of the Neocatechumenal Way from their first rambling catechesis held in the late sixties of the twentieth century in the crypt of the Roman metropolitan church of Canadian Martyrs. And among these many, and indeed also beautiful subsequent documents at Vatican II, we can mention the one dedicated to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on Certain Questions Concerning the Minister of the Eucharist, where we find these words imprinted: . "In teaching that the ministerial or hierarchical priesthood differs essentially and not only in degree from the common priesthood of the faithful, The Second Vatican Council expressed the certainty of faith that only Bishops and priests can confect the Eucharistic Mystery […] In recent years, however, they have begun to spread of opinions, sometimes translated in practice, denying that such education affecting the intimate life of the Church […] They also believe that the Church is apostolic in the sense that all those in holy baptism were washed and incorporated into her, made sharers in the priestly, prophetic and kingly office of Christ, They are also truly successors of the Apostles […] It also follows that, to the extent necessary to the good order of the Church, the ministry of Bishops and priests would not differ from the common priesthood of the faithful as to the participation in the priesthood of Christ in the strict sense, but only by reason […] The call to such a ministry would not amount to a new capacity "priestly" in the strict sense - and why most of the time we avoid the term "priesthood" - but would simply give expression before the community that the original power conferred in the sacrament of Baptism becomes effective […] This conclusion leads also the fact that the celebration of the Eucharist is often understood simply as an act of the local community gathered together to commemorate the Last Supper of the Lord in the breaking of bread. It would therefore be more a fraternal banquet, in which the community comes together and gives expression, than the sacramental renewal of the Sacrifice of Christ, whose saving power extends to all men, present or absent, both living and dead [The ministerial, 1983, full text WHO]. . The question is, to say the least penalty: with this very precise document that would be good, like everyone else recalled here, read carefully in full, who is turning the early eighties of the twentieth century, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith? As regards instead the young mega-catechist of which I have just narrated, I learned later that it was the son of two mega-catechists of the Movement. And despite having understood instantly how arrogant and mostly ignorant person, I was detailed that it was not able to finish even the high school and that in practice was working as a catechist, after having repeatedly failed in some work experience. Maybe I came across an isolated case, or in a so-called borderline case that between these lines, moved by some kind of malice and prevention, port as if it were a kind of rule? No, it is not and I will try to explain better with another example: way back in 2010, when it was doing with some diligence ministry as a confessor in a Roman basilica it is home perpetual Eucharistic Adoration, I went specifically the confessional in which I was to draw attention to a group of the Neocatechumenal who disrespectfully, talking loudly and laughing, They had entered into the basilica where he was exposed the Blessed Sacrament, without a slightest sign of respect and reverence. The worst thing was that it was a group of catechists who were to hold a meeting between them (!?). More of their irreverent noise, far more irreverent was the answer of most mega-catechist among the group of mega-catechists. It was an hour before the Neocatechumenal, She could tell by his age, model seventies of the twentieth century and there remained fossilized, who he said to me,: . "Boy, see to give you calm down, because I think you have a lot to learn: the Easter bread is not made to be exposed, but to be eaten as nourishment of the spirit '. . I grabbed a heavy gilt bronze chandelier from a side chapel and Intimae very seriously: . "Get out immediately on your lap, or would you prefer me to come get soon an ambulance to take you at your nearest emergency orthopedic traumatology department?» . That said I will stop certainly to add, because nothing There is just to add. Perhaps one thing I can add: the day before this happened did, as I was to begin my turn to confessions, a lovely old Roman motioned me to approach with her hand to her shortly after the front door, He walked so unsteadily help of his cane: . «Father, jie I asked 'a grace pe' is Pora old?». . He motioned with his head and she went: . «She who as a priest is pure holy n'anima was' No great sinner, He might kneels' pe me in front of Domnineddio, because I know 'years nun me that I can no longer kneels before him ar Lord. So always domanno to quarche young if some '' nginocchiasse pe 'me. But then, If pe 'me' even a priest s'enginocchia, er Lord Jie happier AGAIN». . Here is a true and authentic mega-catechist of which the Neocatechumenal would seriously, urgent and vital need, if they were not the result and the sad product of confused ignorance and arrogance of Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández. . I find it disheartening that before the obvious mistakes of this movement some of my fellow priests did not hesitate to betray the mission of their divine mandate that involves a office triple: teaching, governing and sanctificandi [to teach, to rule, santificare]. Like it or not, ours is an orderly hierarchical structure sacramentally, therefore, between the priest and the lay faithful, the ratio is not horizontal, face to face, but it is a top-down ratio, When the priest exercises his office. Is this office It can not in any way be dominated by the role of mega-lay catechists who exercise their potestas totally unwarranted - since theologically, ecclesially and canonically nonexistent - on the figure of the priests themselves, and in a particular way on those belonging to the Neocatechumenal, sadly peace for the Church's responsibility and thus for the eternal salvation of the soul of those ecclesiastical authorities who allowed this Movement, with the opening of their seminars, of being able to fabricate even priests to their own measurement. That fact very brutally: the central figure, This Movement, is that of the mega-catechists, priests are considered and treated as pure consecrators of wafers, moreover packaged according to the recipes of Arguello and distributed as established by him. . If certain affiliates and certain mega-catechists in a very particular way can be very difficult to recover, if not through real psychological therapies for de-mental programming, which as we said previously are long, expensive and the outcome far from certain, the columns of this our happy Island of Patmos, however, we can reach out to all those who might avoid falling into this network, or to those who, there being recently fallen, They can get out quite smoothly. Let me therefore conclude this purpose and end with a brief catechesis on the priesthood, Based on the writings and the words of the great Fathers of the Church, which I hope will be recognized more wisdom, grace, authority and authoritativeness of what they had never Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández ... . ... the Holy Bishop Ambrose says: «[…] the dignity of the priest is the noblest of all. There is nothing more sublime in this world. The dignity of the priest exceeds that of kings, as gold lead. Gold is not much more valuable than lead, how much is the highest dignity of the priesthood on the royal dignity. This is because the power of kings is limited to the bodies of subjects, material goods, that of the priests on the other hand extends spiritual goods, soul ' [The dignity of the Priest]. . The holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church Augustine of Hippo, talking about the inseparable relationship between the Eucharist and the ministerial priesthood writes: "O venerable holiness in my hands! O happy work! Who created me, he gave me power to create him! Who created without me, he has created himself by me!» [ In Ps. 37]. He explains in his sermon the Church Father St. Jerome: "The word God created out of nothing heaven and earth, so, the word of the priest, during the Eucharistic celebration, creates Christ " [The report about the body of Christ]. Writes St. Clement of Alexandria: "The more the soul is important in the body, the more excellent is the priesthood of a kingdom " [constant. AP. 1.2, (c). 34]. And St. John Chrysostom: "The principles exert power over the body constraints; the priests also on the soul " [the Jac. 1.3]. The Holy Doctor of the Church, Bernard of Clairvaux teaches well: "That the priest surpasses all dignities of King, emperors and the angels' [Word to pasta. In Syn.]. To follow with Angelic Doctor Thomas Aquinas, who teaches that "The priestly dignity even exceeds that of the angels [3 p., q. 22, art. 1]. Perhaps taking a cue in this from other previous, because already St. Gregory Nazianzen also taught in his sermons: "The priesthood is also worshiped by angels' [word 26 Sanct. Petr.]. St. Francis of Assisi, when to instruct their brothers to the sacred respect for priests sent them on purpose to confess to priests known for their bad conduct of life, she used to say: "If I saw an angel of heaven and a priest, before genufletterei before the priest, then before the Angel ". . At the time of the Fourth Lateran Council, the Pope Innocent III wrote: "Although the Blessed Virgin is superior to the Apostles, However, only these keys of the kingdom of heaven have been entrusted " [A new kind of Pocn. Rem.]. Concept which is echoed by San Bernardino of Siena in one of his sermons: 'Blessed Virgin, forgive me, I do not mean to offend you in any way, but the priest prevails on you!» [Tom. The, word 20, art. 2, (c). 7]. And with these words the Holy Preacher intended to explain and transmit the Mater Dei conceived Christ once for, while the priest, reciting the Eucharistic Prayer, This makes every time celebrating the Eucharistic Sacrifice of the Mass, because with the sacred species of bread and wine he conceives how often wants. . We could go on and on with the theological literature of the great Fathers and Doctors of the Church, but I think we can stop to expose a dramatic query: It was needed Arguello and Carmen Hernandez to rewrite the Eucharist and with it the ministerial priesthood? What terrible sadness in seeing these neocatecumenalizzati priests who, after having lost the very perception of the dignity that has been conferred upon them by the Sacrament of grace, shake their heads in assent while in the room stands the figure of the mega-catechist who rant before the priest poor dumb and condescending, unaware of being coated, forever, for eternity, a dignity that is higher than the dignity of the same angels of God ... that immense sadness! And if all this happened, it is because the same visible Church has lost dramatically, I dare say almost diabolical, the dignity that Christ incarnate Word of God, dead, resurrected and ascended to heaven, He has given to the Church his bride. . May God have mercy therefore of grave sins of omission our Ecclesiastical Authority, that rather than protect the Church and its Holy People are continuing to talk ... talk ... talk ... throwing at most, occasionally, a few words of reproach more or less veiled or two-way. But in veiled reproach jokes or two-way, unfortunately it does not reside salvation: nor of those who make the jokes, nor the people of God that receives. . XII CONCLUSION . Everything I have written It has been driven by the imperative priestly awareness for the love I have for the Holy Church of Christ and the living members of the Holy People of God, then to alert these same limbs that the Neocatechumenal is in all respects a casing only apparently Catholic, that internally encloses misleading doctrines of Jewish-Protestant matrix, mixed with old heresies again reformulated and made present in our contemporary. This movement is so determined, despite numerous and unnecessary calls by the Holy See, to perpetrate serious liturgical abuses, which as explained in detail in this border on my exposure often the real sacrilege of the Holy Eucharist, they mistakenly perceived and transmitted as joyful banquet and fraternal convivio, with blatant and contemptuous refusal sacrificial element that renews the memorial altar the bloodless sacrifice of the saving Passion of Christ the Lord, who with his sacrifice became the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world [GV 1, 29]. . The leaders of this movement have not transposed neither gained nor transmitted all the teachings of the Second Vatican Council regarding the diverse and distinct characteristics that characterize the common priesthood of the baptized and the ministerial priesthood received by sacramental grace Ministers in sacris, nor they have transposed, always from the doctrines of the Council, what is the precise role of the laity in the Catholic Church. This movement is structured in all respects like a closed sect that tends to engulf the people, leveraging on their weakness and fragility for the purpose of making them subservient and therefore still weaker, while our mission, task and purpose is to acquaint Christi fideles that truth will make you free [GV, 8]. For this reason, fulfilling my role as a pastor in charge of souls, confessor and spiritual director, whenever the opportunity presented itself, I always discouraged the faithful from taking any kind of path to the rediscovery and deepening of the Catholic faith within this movement where raging serious disorders liturgical and doctrinal errors. . Claims made against me by the Neocatechumenal, I publicly accused of promoting liturgical abuses and heretical doctrines, they are and are irrelevant and devoid of foundation as of now, If no objective truth and scientific rigor. It was in fact with historical rigor, theological, ecclesiological and legal - and certainly not moved by emotional instincts - I indicated proven and documented evidence of their mistakes, verifiable by anyone involved in around the world for their exotic liturgies or the catechesis held by many of their highly unprepared catechists. But if they believe that is wrong I, in that case they have to submit my writing to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, asking it to indicate my mistakes and then force me to publish, the same journal in which I published this my critical examination, The text of disapproval towards me where the competent department instead attesting full legitimacy, as approved by the Holy See, the Eucharistic Liturgies celebrated by the Neocatechumenal in major non-conformity to the liturgical books and Instruction on the Roman Missal, then the full legitimacy, as approved by the Holy See, of their oral catechesis do not conform to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and finally the full legitimacy, as approved by the Holy See, of lay catechists figures that overhang and that place in the second floor before the faithful the figure of the priest of Christ. . Otherwise, the Neocatechumenal silent, because it will be better for them and for the salvation of their souls, because I seriously doubt that the Holy See, in their defense, agree to contradict, or worse to deny, the principal documents of the Second Vatican Council and those of the Magisterium of the Church. It has been doing rigorous scientific use of these documents that the Neocatechumenal persist in fact to flout, I put in clear light - and only for imperative of conscience -, their serious and dangerous heresies, which combine an arbitrary use, and sometimes even sacrilegious, Sacred Liturgy of the Eucharist. And from all this, the Holy People of God, It should be asked to keep away. "Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture" [Gives, 23]. . From the island of Patmos 27 March 2019 . . . REMEMBER TO US Dear Readers, certain pastoral jobs processed through meticulous research and study of the texts of the Magisterium of the Church, involve a commitment and especially a job that each of you is perfectly able to understand in all its scope. A fortiori it is necessary and it is worth repeating that The island of Patmos She stands up only with offers of Readers. Therefore, When we offer you free the amor Dei certain jobs, have the goodness and generosity especially to understand that our work, if you feel judged and truly valid, It needs to be supported, because at the moment we have neither sponsors or donations of any kind. So do not forget from time to time one of us, or send us your free and generous contribution to support the apostolic work of this magazine, which has its operating costs and that to date has only been able to go ahead thanks to you. And what God reward. . . «You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32], but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island with your offers through the secure Paypal system: or you can use the bank account: They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930 in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank It does not provide your email and we could not send you a thanksgiving [ firstname.lastname@example.org ] . . . . . .