Dear Father Alessandro Minutella: difenditi. But foul honoring the Roman Pontiff and without falling into the old trap of Martin Luther

DEAR FATHER ALEXANDER Minutella: Defend yourself. BUT I DO honoring the Roman Pontiff, WITHOUT DROPPING IN OLD TRAP OF MARTIN LUTHER

.

At the Pontiff nobody stops you in a respectful and filial report, on the basis of verified evidence, his moral and pastoral defects, after having first he bowed his head in front of his infallible teaching of truth. He 'so careful not to fall into the trap where Martin Luther fell with all heretics, ie the pretext of moral and pastoral defects, real and objective of the Pope, She might accuse him of heresy and reject his teaching office.

.

.

Authors
John Cavalcoli, o.p – Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

PDF format Print article

.

.

Deliver me from the hand of my enemies, by the close of my persecutors [Will 31,16]

.

.

Venerable Brother in Christ,

.

The priest Alessandro Palermo Minutella [to open the video click on the image]

we listened to the video of your defense against accusations of Cardinal Beniamino Stella, Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy [cf. WHO]. This video was sent to us by several readers who asked our opinion on its contents. To those who have asked opinion and to you, we respond publicly: it seems to us that you've defended well.

.

Please take into account that direct you to this commentary are two priests, respectively: one Romagna, the other Tuscan-Roman. This is to help you understand, not worth misunderstandings, some of our examples as it ironic, paradoxical or if you want even grotesque. It calms the fact that you are in Sicily, son of a noble ancient people in an elegant irony is master.

.

This your story, rather than with the highest levels of the Holy See seems a bit’ have to do with a country priest of the thirties of the twentieth century, that to redo the roof of the church, restoring the rectory and build church halls, He had to rely on the generous donations of a wealthy landowner in the area. This landowner, however, has a daughter who is given to the mad joy and, as they say, jumping happily in the young lad. Everybody knows, but everyone is silent, because the villagers depend on wealthy landowner, that to a large part of their work gives, therefore livelihood. The cheerful whore goes to the Archpriest of obligation for confession before Easter, being behind the grille of the confessional a lovable man, paterno, inclusive, today we would say: merciful. Thus, The good priest, almost comforts her by telling her: «Eh, my daughter, when you are young, it can also happen to commit some small mistake, but of course: small". The bitch comes out well paid and even comforted, before giving way to the grate of the confessional to the daughter of a servant of the rich and powerful father of the previous penitent, servant who works as a laundress in the manor house, her husband instead works as a farmer in the extensive grounds of this owner. The young man is engaged to the son of the other farmers, a great guy, which he embraced and kissed. Here, then, that the pious confessor turns into what in the Criminal Code at the time was the investigating judge, and sternly, following the pattern of the Manual Confessors It is written in the second half of the nineteenth century by Jean Baptiste Bouvier, Bishop of Le Mans, He begins to ask how close was embraced, but above all as the kisses were exchanged, because if data mouth shut, were venial sins, but if the mouth had been well and only slightly ajar, in this case it would be deadly sin; and between a pleasant description and the other, the confessor juggles everything recalling the penitent Hell Fire.

.

We do not say that your behavior was totally correct and error-free, as you will see below; but we must in good conscience say that the evidence shows, Cardinal Beniamino Stella, with a life spent in the diplomatic service of the Holy See - this thing that makes it a great pastor in the care of souls and a great connoisseur of pastoral life and the apostolate of the clergy -, flying over the army of whores that today populate the Church, if it is taken with hugs and passionate kisses exchanged by a virgin with her boyfriend.

.

Taken by the force of the sacred fire of passion, some things wrong in the time you called, followed by severe judgments that did not account to the end of the extreme and entirely new complexity of the unprecedented crisis historians that our poor Church is experiencing today. Nevertheless acting, before your Bishop, then the congregation for the clergy, objectively it is missing an element that is the foundation of that right called themselves to administer justice, to restore justice violated, so to do justice, namely: sense of proportion. We have said shortly before by the example of high-class whore that is given to all the crazy joys of the case, compared to the daughter of the laundress and the farmer under investigation for a hug and a kiss he exchanged with her boyfriend.

.

It is sad to note to be treated disproportionately by those who should support us and guide us in the fight. It is sad compulsion to resist brothers should be brothers in arms in the holy struggle and instead they are on the side of the enemy. It is sad that today the Church is persecuted by his own shepherds, while "our enemies laugh at us" [Will 80,7]. It is sad that there are pastors who prefer to come to terms with the world rather than following Christ.

.

And yet, dear Brother, you who know the history of the Church and the miseries of her children and your same miseries, do not you wonder, but seize the opportunity to forgive your enemies and live more intensely your sacred priesthood, in union with the divine victim on the altar of the Holy Sacrifice.

.

Today, Satan is putting to the test the Supreme Pastor of the Church. It is looking like wheat [LC 22, 31], Therefore God allows that he stagger under the blows, is sensitive to the lure, the blandishments and the attractions of the world; It allows that the Devil wickedly take advantage of its weaknesses, it is surrounded by friends as Christ on the Cross, but by "a pack of dogs" [Will 22,17], not to be trusted and competent employees, but Judases. Therefore orccorre very, as he often invites us to do, pray for him. certainly it must unravel the evil plots, in the Church, ordendo are the children of the devil against the Pope and against the Bride of Christ. If that's what you're doing is fine, indeed, as you may have noticed, for years we also do our Fathers de The island of Patmos. But it is imperative that you do a clear profession of fidelity to the Roman Pontiff, because your enemies, many of which are also dangerous enemies of the Church - the ones who are false friends and false representatives of the Roman Pontiff -, They would have you go as an enemy.

.

Oppose and with all your strength to this diabolical maneuver, thunders with mighty voice your solid certainty to recognize the Pope Francis I, the Vicar of Christ and the Master of faith, because only then will be able to cut their serpentine tongue.

.

On the day of our priestly ordination, consecrated priests forever through this sacrament of grace, the ordaining bishop in communion with the Bishop of Rome - then in fact, how do you know, the Bishop of Rome - none of us has promised that he estimated the ordaining bishop and the Roman Pontiff, or that he professed deep and unconditional sympathy for him. We all have promised filial devotion and obedience, no one has promised to unconditionally estimated the Roman Pontiff; and there is that over the last four years has changed the rite of the Sacrament of Holy Orders. You may also not feed estimated, in respect of the reigning Pontiff. And if the sad thing can comfort you know that not estimate it, you are not the only one. But if the Roman Pontiff the estimate is not due, because if you want in that case if the must deserve, obedience and faithfulness, that it is instead due, because gliel'abbiamo solemnly promise. Therefore, even if the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio was also one of the worst popes ever in the history of the Church, more so we must remain firm in the faith, aware that, if we undermine the rock of Peter [cf. Mt 13, 16-20], throughout the entire building would collapse.

.

At the Roman Pontiff, nobody stops you in a respectful and filial report, on the basis of verified evidence, his moral and pastoral defects, after having first he bowed his head in front of his infallible teaching of truth. He 'so careful not to fall into the trap where Martin Luther fell with all heretics, ie the pretext of moral and pastoral defects, real and objective of the Pope, She might accuse him of heresy and reject his teaching office.

.

Vice versa, current and flatterers fans the Roman Pontiff, who do not believe at all papal infallibility nor immutability of truth - including numerous theologians, bishops and cardinals - they have the impudence to present themselves as its interpreters, representatives and defenders, and taking advantage of his negligence in suppressing heresy, or its objective and now proven philosophical training deficiencies, historic doctrinal and theological, They have successfully worldly crowds, between the bewilderment of true Catholics, the reigning Pontiff as a modernist. You shy away, rightly, this diabolical hypocrisy, But look well from the first pitfall: ask the Roman Pontiff the same charges which once gave him Luther.

.

The central problem of the Church today - and you've caught -, It is how to judge the reigning Pope and understand what attitude to take towards him. In this regard,, the first thing to keep in mind is, as we have said, that the Holy Father Francis, as all his predecessor, It is infallible teacher of the faith. Its human worthlessness - which unfortunately is a painful fact -, concern only his moral conduct and the government of the Church. While you rather bluntly accuses him of spreading heresy. We highly recommend you to change opinion and attitude and get into a different line of thought: the reigning pontiff is negligent in suppressing heresy. And you know that this is not a semantic game: an account, indeed, It is to spread the heresy, an account, instead, not suppress and not to condemn the heresy. some, before these our statements, They have replicated that heresy, spread it or suppress it, is the same thing. We are sorry, but it is not, What soon explained with a simple example: from the Holy Gospel and the Apostolic Letters, we can also derive the invitation to try to be heroes, but nowhere in these scriptures it is stated the obligation to be heroes. anything, the Blessed Apostle Paul is very clear in stating:

.

"Accept among you who is weak in faith, without discussing this hesitation. One believes he can eat anything, the other, that is weak, eats only vegetables. He who eats not despise those who do not eat; those who do not eat, don't misjudge who eats, for God has welcomed him " [RM 14, 1-3].

.

Do you also remember that the Gospel and dogma It is clear that a Roman Pontiff can not be, form, intentionally and voluntarily heretic, because that would suppose that Christ lied when he promised to Peter his assistance. Instead it can happen - and in fact happened - that a Roman Pontiff, materially, temporarily and accidentally fall into heresy, because, or deceived, as in the case of Honorius I in the seventh century, or because they threatened, as in the case of Liberius in the fourth century, or recklessly, as John XXII in the fourteenth century, or to mental weakness or perhaps even for some mental disorder; What it does not yet happened in the history of the papacy, but it could also happen.

.

As for the reigning Pontiff, accusations that unfortunately you can ask him for a long time we believe that the following:

.

  1. ambiguities of language;
  1. gross negligence in defending the sound doctrine;
  1. Reviews praise against heretics;
  1. use of inadequate staff and very dangerous;
  1. tolerate being praised by the modernists as a modernist without in any way disprove such and dangerous laudatori.

.

If the modernists and rage if they are the masters, if not modernists are persecuted and the Roman Pontiff is surrounded by co-workers and friends heretics, in part this is due to their power and their cunning, but mostly it is due to his dishonesty and his attachment to the success and worldly power. these, in our opinion, the points on which you have to beat.

.

To us it is unfortunately clear in what way the reigning Pontiff has himself into terrible trouble, from which today can not come out, finally being in the condition of not being able to respond by saying clearly neither yes nor no. So it is our duty to suggest, as the title of a novel by Ignazio Silone, one Emergency exit, otherwise it could risk going to Hell with him dragging behind many. And this emergency exit is the Blessed Virgin Mary Mother of the Church, of which he is a devotee says.

.

We would then suggest some ideas for your line of defense and some advice for your action.

.

First point. As you yourself have reported to Cardinal Beniamino Stella who accuses you of having caused confusion and bewilderment in the Church, create confusion, to break the ecclesial communion and to speak against the reigning Pontiff; all these accusations, to be valid, should be explained and justified. Indeed, if there is no explanation of the charges, they are null, as lacking in meaning. Since it's talking authority figures who seem to want to impose itself by force - and not just in your case -, you have to refute them with logic or with canon law. If they do not listen, They will be held accountable to God and his Holy People. Therefore you must make clear in particular:

.

  1. What are the two terms of confusion? It confuses A with B. What is that you confuse? What it is A and which is B? Therefore, what constitutes confusion?
  2. Loss? What or who made you lose, how and to whom? What evidence have?
  3. You have created confusion? You have scandalized, troubled or upset the good principles and the peace of the faithful? Which? As?
  4. You broke ecclesial communion? You have been rebellious to the Church? you schismatic? What do you mean?
  5. You have spoken against the reigning Pope? You have insulted? With such insults? Did you defamed? You have rejected or falsified his teaching? Which one? You have despised his authority? What?

.

Because the charges are sensible and valid, must be accurate, motivated and demonstrated on the basis of canon law and the doctrine of faith or about proved actions you performed in the exercise of your ministry or some propositions to you incurred, otherwise it is slander and defamation, or simply arrogant acts of free will in defiance to all the basic criteria of Church law.

.

The generic accusation does not hit the target and the accused was unharmed. The unfounded accusation is false and unjust accusation: lack of evidence. And again the accused remains innocent. In this case the accusation is nothing: To subvert the accused and backfires sull'accusatore, which it is required to repair and to restore the good name taken from the accused.

.

Second point. In our opinion, rather than "neochiesa" or "false church", you'd do well to speak of "modernists", because of what exactly it is. It's old stuff, They are not new - otherwise really bring water to their mill -, even though they see themselves as the prophets of the Holy Spirit, the spearhead of the Church, for example, the followers of Karl Rahner, Walter Kasper, Gianfranco Ravasi, Frei Betto, Enzo Bianchi, Jacques Dupuis, Vito Mancuso, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Leonard Boff o Edward Schillebeeckx. Indeed, although they have a false concept of the Church - and for this, do not constitute a Church, but a group of power or heretical sect within the Church that is ruining the Church -, yes they, which they are worthy of being excommunicated. Calling them "modernists"[1], them would you identify with greater precision and historical accuracy, in such a way as to make them more recognizable; in tal modo, your criticism, It would be more targeted and effective. In other passages you call them with the right name, because they are actually "slaves of the modern world", that does not light up or correct, as they should, in the light of the Gospel, but "the modern world is their god, which sacrifice the Gospel ".

.

third point. It is necessary for you to distinguish the reigning Pope his doctrinal authority and magisterial from his pastoral activity of the Church and his government. In the first field, he can do no wrong. If anything needs to be done some of his benevolent interpretation statements, because actually it happens that they are ambiguous: They may leave or be subject to an orthodox sense or in a sense unorthodox. For example, certain statements in Chapter VIII of 'The joy of love seem influenced or historicism or ethics of the situation, but at a closer look you may realize that they are doctrinally correct, although ambiguous. If anything, the fact that you can do to the reigning Pope is the lack of clarity about whether the divorced and remarried may or may not, in certain cases, be admitted to the Sacraments.

.

the reigning Pontiff Error It is surely to shirk its responsibility, ie to interpellations, if only to reject them, especially considering ch'esse go up more and more - some very influential - by the People of God, leaving to others the more or less authoritative or questionable answers, or allow questions put to him meet the modernists spreading false interpretations, What this extreme gravity. In doing so he gives the impression of being evasive or not to be master of matter he treated, or in other words that brutally: to be ignorant. However, keep in mind - as we have amply demonstrated over the past two years The Island of Patmos - which in itself the Supreme Pontiff, under the power of the keys, It has the power to change the existing discipline concerning the question of granting the sacraments to divorced and remarried in special cases. What you quite rightly point out, It is that he has not yet ruled on whether grants or does not grant permission. So for now it's current legislation, that is the one contained in the n. 84 of Family company the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II.

.

Fourth. Instead, it is legitimate to point out to the reigning Pontiff some of his serious moral and pastoral errors, for example, he:

.

  1. Talk of Christ, but he does not remember and neglects his office as Vicar of Christ;
  2. He speaks of confidence in God, but he does not speak of the fear of God;
  3. about faith, but it does not make clear that faith is intellectual knowledge of the truth and that only in the Catholic Church is the fullness of truth;
  4. He speaks the truth of faith, but he does not speak of the immutability of dogma;
  5. He speaks of sin, but he never speaks of the sin of heresy;
  6. He speaks of faith and does not speak of reason;
  7. He speaks of charity, but it does not make clear that the charity depends on the truth;
  8. He speaks of love of neighbor, but he does not speak of the higher love of God;
  9. He speaks of the duty of fraternal charity, but he never talks about the good works;
  10. He speaks of the duty to do the will of God, but no one ever says that the natural moral law is immutable;
  11. excommunicated the mobsters, but not the excommunication modernists;
  12. condemns abortion, but it is soft on the abortionists;
  13. exalts marriage, but does not reproach the adulterous couples;
  14. He speaks of adulterous couples, but he says they must stop their relationship;
  15. about families wounds, but he does not speak of feritrici and scandalous families;
  16. He speaks of the respect due to homosexuals, but condemns the sin of sodomy;
  17. He says that all are called to be children of God, but he says that only those who believe in Christ and in the grace is God's son;
  18. He speaks of salvation, but he does not speak of the beatific vision;
  19. He speaks of sin, but he says he does lose grace;
  20. He speaks of sin, but he says he deserves the punishment;
  21. He speaks of nature as it was only intended to be used by man and neglects to mention the hostility of the punitive nature of sin;
  22. He speaks of human dignity, but it does not explain how and why it is corrupted by original sin, hence the necessity of the law, order legal and judicial, dell’ascetica, the discipline and the right coercion;
  23. He speaks of Baptism, but it says that the original offense was a historical fact and that the original sin is transmitted by generation;
  24. He speaks of the Eucharist, but he does not speak of transubstantiation;
  25. talks about the Priesthood, but he does not say which involves the offering of sacrifice;
  26. It recommended that the confessional is not a "torture chamber", but remember that there are certain conditions in which the faithful can not be absolved;
  27. He speaks of episcopal collegiality, but it discloses the bishops who disobey the Pope or the Magisterium of the Church;
  28. He speaks of the saints in heaven and neglect to mention Hell Damned;
  29. He speaks of welcoming Church, but he does not speak of the Church Militant;
  30. He says the Church is open to all, but he says that should excommunicate rebels, without confusing them with the prophets;
  31. He speaks of persecution in the world, but he does not speak of intra-ecclesial persecution;
  32. deplores the terrorists, but he says that many of them are inspired by the Koran;
  33. He says that the Church is at the service of the world, but he does not say that the Church does not serve the world and transcending the world;
  34. He speaks of dialogue with the world, but he does not speak of confrontation and victory over the world;
  35. talks about the diversity of religions, but neglects to mention the supremacy of Christianity over other religions;
  36. He speaks of conversion, but it does not say that non-believers and heretics must be converted;
  37. He says that you must respect each other, but it does not say that you must beware of heretics;
  38. He says that we must listen to the other, but it does not say that we need to correct and convert the unbelievers and non-believers;
  39. talks about the duty to rescue the suffering, but neglects to mention the value of expiation and expiatory suffering;
  40. He says that God is merciful to repentant, but neglects to mention the punishment of the wicked;
  41. He speaks of the material works of mercy, but of greater importance than the spiritual mercy;
  42. condemns violence, but he does not speak of the just use of force;
  43. condemns the unjust war, leaving him to imply that every war is unjust, because every war is motivated only by economic interests or power, and it can not be done in the name of God or divine;
  44. preaches compassion for the oppressed, but it does not say that the oppressors will go to Hell.

.

Dear Brother, We're close to your test, but please just to this question you if by chance you have not given many occasions to the storm that was unleashed against you and on you.

.

While it is easy to say and harder to come instead, we urge you to bear in peace, united to Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary, as we are sure you'll be doing, and providing for the good of your souls and your sufferings. Willing to Church you can continue to perform your priestly mission, waiting for justice to be done. So you can put a new and rich fruit of the mind and heart the gifts God has given you.

.

Let us remember each other in prayer.

.

the Island of Patmos, 16 January 2018

.

_______________

NOTE

[1] The modernists today, for those who know the history of heresies, They are anything but modern, because they are the exhumation, with a new makeup and a suitable deodorant, Modernism condemned by the Holy Pontiff Pius X. They love to cover herself with the honest adjective "progressive", but in fact they are the forgers of the genuine ecclesial progress.

.

.

DEAR READERS, PLEASE PROMPTLY TO READ THIS SCRIPT OUR, WHO

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanksgiving [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Avatar

About isoladipatmos

2 thoughts on "Dear Father Alessandro Minutella: difenditi. But foul honoring the Roman Pontiff and without falling into the old trap of Martin Luther

  1. kudos to the article that it is done right!
    You have, in a calm and classy, He said everything there was to say, both the 'persecuted’ priest who the other protagonists of the story.

    really good!

  2. "... the Supreme Pontiff, under the power of the keys, It has the power to change the existing discipline concerning the question of granting the sacraments to divorced and remarried in special cases ".
    I ask, because I want to understand: The Supreme Pontiff, under the power of the keys, can grant absolution and then admitted to a person communion divorced "remarried", without it renounces to commit adultery? explain well, Please, because I am not understanding anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters remaining

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.