The Archbishop of Palermo persecuted by hyenas? He wanted the bike, now he has to ride

- ecclesial news -

ARCHBISHOP OF PALERMO PERSECUTED FROM IENE? He WANTED TO RIDE, NOW MUST CYCLING

.

[…] But I felt a certain sadness in seeing the movie the Archbishop of Palermo run away several times running, because in that moment I was reminded of several holy bishops, some of them martyrs of the faith, which with admirable dignity, They are made to find them sitting on the episcopal throne, right on which they were slaughtered by Muslims

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

..

S. AND. Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Metropolitan Archbishop of Palermo, chased by hyenas television networks Mediaset [click on image to open the video]

Reservoir Dogs eponymous TV show they must always be taken with pliers. Therefore, the story about the alleged ill-treatment of employees of a foundation of the Archdiocese of Palermo, We can not comment on that belong to the judiciary, specifically the labor courts. Se the Hyenas raise a case, this does not entitle anyone to will issue judgments ruling. We know that certain issues are increasingly complex practices.

.

.

Corrado Lorefice, work dedicated to the figures of Giuseppe Dossetti and Giacomo Lercaro: The poor Church and the poor from the perspective of Vatican II

It may however be that S.It is. Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily, We are preparing to take a healthy life lesson that will make it definitely a shepherd in the care of souls much better, coming perhaps to his old age as a truly holy bishop. And the lesson is this: to the bishop in 2018 it is very difficult. Speaking the same age then as Archbishop panormitano, from which they differ as little as ten months of age, I can say that if me, priest without any previous experience of episcopal ministry, at fifty-two he had proposed his appointment as Archbishop of Palermo, I would have categorically refused to accept, first of all because I know my limits and why you do not need special knowledge to understand that we are talking about one of the largest and most especially difficult episcopal sees in Italy; and Palermo, a so-called hard seat, it is historically, of always. In recent times it should be all too emblematic of the history of Cardinal Francesco Carpino [Palazzolo Acreide 1905 – Rome 1993], elected to the archbishop's chair of Palermo in 1967 and which he made an act of surrender three years later in 1970, giving as an official statement that the Archdiocese had very difficult pastoral problems for which we needed a younger archbishop who could sketch out long-term programs …

.

… in rejecting the appointment to that office, I'd even bothered to Ecclesiastical Authority to give an unsolicited advice: Palermo send a bishop who had already gained and gained some experience in the holy episcopal ministry, giving good account of himself in the pastoral governance. But, as I repeat, I have a sense of my limitations and above all a sense of proportion.

.

the 29 April 2016 panormitana was celebrated in the Cathedral of the Jubilee Sports, at which it was donated to the Archbishop Metropolitan a flask and a bicycle with which he walked around the presbytery

Those who had accepted without making similar assessments, today should apply the wise proverb: "You wanted the bike? Now ride!». Or make it clear that the appointment to the complex and delicate archbishopric of Palermo he was not offered, but imposed by obedience. What more impossible that rare, For if a man says he does not feel or that it is not considered up to the demanding task, no ecclesiastical authority never impose obedience.

.

S. AND. Mons. Corrado Lorefice He is the author of several books which speak of the poor, and yearns for a poor Church for the poor. What this leads me to a great confidence in him and especially to stimulate workers who appear to have opened a dispute with the diocese, to have deep confidence in their Archbishop, for sensitivity and training it is very sensitive to the poor and poverty, as shown by his books; and this deep sensitivity surely prevent the, in pastoral conscience, to let it end up in a state of distress and poverty of workers and their respective families.

.

one of the texts devoted to poverty and poor Church for the poor S.It is. Mons. Corrado Lorefice

I repeat: no one can enter into the an issue that must be evaluated and judged in the appropriate fora, certainly not from Hyenas, who first missed badly of respect and education are going to try the Archbishop in his cathedral church during a public meeting, or worse disturbandolo during a religious procession. What I can say is just to have felt a certain sadness in seeing the movie the Archbishop of Palermo run away several times running, because in that moment I was reminded of several holy bishops, some of them martyrs of the faith, which with admirable dignity they are made in sitting on their episcopal chair, right on which they were slaughtered by those Muslims belonging to the religion of peace and love that recently narrated the Supreme Pontiff, albeit gently, and promptly denied dall'islamologo Jesuit Samir Khalil Samir [cf. WHO]. Among the many martyrs bishops remember the beautiful figure of Archbishop Otranto, martyred by Muslims in 1480 [cf. WHO], which tells the Chronicle:

.

the face of a poor Church

"Archbishop Stefano, after all the previous day had heartened the people with the sacrament of the Eucharist, He went up from the crypt of the cathedral in the choir and there, martyr of the faith in Christ and honored by the priestly vestments, He was slain on his episcopal throne by the Turks, when they raided " [cf. Antonio Ferrari, in De website Japigiae].

.

This is equivalent to saying: once you had the bicycle, they pedaled to Paradiso much better than two professional cyclists like Gino Bartali and Fausto Coppi would have done. But as we know, were other times. At the time,, on the bike, They only professional athletes were put, while today, a bicycle, it's a clerical courtesy which is not denied to anyone …

.

"Man, my heart is not proud
and with pride my gaze does not rise;
I do not go looking for big things,
beyond my strength ' [Salmo 131].

.

the Island of Patmos, 20 October 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

Hypatia Roman cat talking to the raven Enzo Bianchi, now participating in the Synod to show young people the path, the truth and the life …

- the cogitatorio of Hypatia -

IPAZIA ROMAN CAT IN CONVERSATION WITH THE CROW OF ENZO BIANCHI, TODAY AT THE SYNOD PARTICIPANT TO INDICATE THE WAY TO YOUTH, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE ...

.

[…] I have a crow, as I believe that in fact it is Enzo Bianchi, despite not having the pens. Our sound is similar, he croaks like me when he speaks. Either we turn to the world in search of some pearl or jewel to steal. I try and steal the jewels and pearls materials, He steals but those souls who listen to him after having already stolen pearls and jewels of Christianity and the Catholic Church.

.

Author
Roman cat Hypatia

.

.

To enter the bookshop click on the cover

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Giovanni

The Synod Youth: Enzo Bianchi and original sin in the context of a dissolution

- ecclesial news -

THE SYNOD OF YOUTH: ENZO WHITE AND THE ORIGINAL SIN IN THE CONTEXT OF A DISSOLUTION

.

Who today wants to speak to young people in a credible way, but especially those who intend to protect them from the work of the devil that in the twentieth century and the new millennium seems to have triggered in all areas and at all levels, It should first invite them to flee the inside of sin, certainly not to insert the acronym LBGT nell’Instrument of Work of the Synod, to see how to fix certain new “edifying” trends.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

Enzo Bianchi visit by Pope Francis I

He could miss the Bose Prior Emeritus, His Beatitude Enzo Bianchi, the Synod Youth? The time to stop the preaching of the spiritual exercises to the clergy at Ars [cf. item WHO], and here he is coming to give relief precious pearls as a participant in the Synod. And since we are in the era of so-called "epochal revolution", He first explained to reporters that in this Synod "There is a great freedom of action than in previous synods I have experienced" [cf. WHO]. Obviously HB fails to point out that this “freedom” very recalls period of terror Robespierre during the French Revolution, since all those who have raised objections in various capacities free, or they have been dismissed from their offices of the curia, or discharged without cause, or left in place but totally ousted from the exercise of their duties, or died of a broken heart, as the late Cardinal Carlo Caffara [cf. our articles, WHO, WHO].

.

Perhaps, His Beatitude, ignores that in the world, the crimes and the worst injustices, paradoxically, they were made in the name of freedom of pretexts. The noblewoman Marie-Jeanne Roland de la Platière remains the emblem, that climbing the stairs to the guillotine said: «Oh Freedom, what crimes are committed in thy name!» [Oh, freedom, how many crimes are committed in thy name!].

.

Who today wants to speak to young people in a credible way, but especially those who intend to protect them from the work of the devil that in the twentieth century and the new millennium seems to have triggered in all areas and at all levels, It should first invite them to flee the inside of sin, certainly not to insert the acronym LBGT nell’IThe Labor nstrumentum of the Synod, to see how to fix certain new ones “edifying” trends [cf. our article WHO]. Obviously, none of this can be accomplished, When talking to young people is precisely invited His Beatitude, who is not only qualified to gloss over sin, because going deeper still and starting from the root, Enzo Bianchi ends up denying, through its smoky interpretations, the same original sin. A quel point, everything becomes more or less lawful beyond good and evil. And then he asks to speak to young people? Why the young should not be offered nor washy Gospel, nor an easy way, at least according to what he said Jesus Christ:

.

"Enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad the way that leads to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:; how narrow is the door and how narrow is the way that leads to life, and few there be that find!» [Mt 7, 13-14].

.

Let's see what is the concept of original sin This person invited to the Synod after having just finished preaching to priests …

.

The whole meaning of Christianity It rests on the doctrine of original sin. If this doctrine is distorted, the whole of Christianity crumbles. Indeed, Christianity, It is the original sin divine power of salvation and its consequences and return humanity to the happy condition precedent to sin, with the addition of a superior condition, that of the "children of God", "Spiritual men", the image of the Son Jesus Christ.

.

The redemptive work of Christ It is essentially to free mankind from original sin and its consequences: in healing the wounds, remove the condemnation of sin, covetousness, the suffering, death and bondage to Satan, giving satisfaction with the sacrifice of the cross to the Father for our sins, reconciling with each other and with the Father and by obtaining for his mercy and his forgiveness, and giving the law and the grace of the Holy Spirit, that makes us children of God, heirs of eternal life.

.

It is clear then that is impossible understand and appreciate the greatness of the Father's mercy, for mercy sends us his innocent Son to die on the cross For us and for our health, for us sinners, insolvent debtors, If you do not understand the immense gravity and pervasiveness of original sin, origin of all our sins and misery, in which, for righteous judgment of the Father, it threw the whole of humanity.

.

Christ is the divine Physician, who knows our ills, can interpret our disorders, shows us the causes and consequences and teaches us how guardarcene, as well as the way and the means to reach the healing. Jesus came on purpose to teach us and show us, through the Church, better and beyond any philosophy, what is the source of evil that afflicts all humanity from time immemorial, evil which alone not only can not free, but which can not even fully understand the nature and to make the diagnosis.

.

It is thus quite false what he says Bianchi, that the Church does not know what is the origin of evil and why, Why, if so, It would not have a way to eliminate it, which is absolutely false, it would be to frustrate the work of redemption and would make the whole Christian zero, or at most would make a philanthropism at the level of the masonry or of Gnosticism, where Jesus Christ is nothing more than a prophet or a great benefactor of humanity, a Nobel Prize, that, to support the cause of justice and the oppressed, It stands firm against opponents to death.

.

The greatest manifestation of divine mercy It is certainly the free forgiveness of sins, ma, according to the Father's plan, explained by the dogma of the Church [1], This plan provides that we collaborate with our suffering, penance and good works in grace, priestly work [2] and cultic repairing and atoning work of Jesus Christ crucified, gift precisely the Father's mercy through which espiamo our sins, and bringing satisfaction to the Father, offended by sin, reconciling us with God in Christ and the Church through the sacraments. So salvation is not only a gift of grace, but also our conquest and reward thanks to merit [3] supernatural good works. By denying the value of the merits, White falls into the same heresy of Luther.

.

White does not understand that the doctrine, taught by the Council of Trent [Denz. 1511, 1522, 1529], for which the Father, outraged and offended by the sin of man, requires reparation, and to that end sends the Son to offer himself in sacrifice on the cross to redeem us from our sins, it is far from a false interpretation, now outdated, the work of the Father and of the Son, as if it were a cruel Father and Son from under the thumb of a domineering father, but it is an immutable dogma of faith [4]. Instead it is biblical and dogmatic doctrine, that makes us understand the immense mercy and admirable justice of the Father, who gives us his Son for the salvation of us sinners, glorifying the Son with us, which in turn, in the Holy Spirit, We glorify the Father in Christ [GV 17]. And in this sacred and divine circularity of mutual glorification it is recapitulated the whole mystery of the Christian liturgy, source and summit of the Christian life, mystery dissolves into the design of Bianchi.

.

The doctrine of original sin, like all the truths revealed, it is not easy to understand and offers great difficulties to our reason. It also emerges only by a skilful connection of passages of Scripture, ranging from the famous story of Genesis, the Book of Job, a San Paolo, to the Apocalypse, between them very distant, whose link is not immediately visible. Moreover, this doctrine, because fundamental, stand and fall of Christianity, branches and has connections with all the other moral truths of divine revelation, Financo with those theoretical, so that one who wanted to expose this doctrine in all its relations with the other truths of faith, should consider the whole set of I believe cristiano. Indeed, the perception and contemplation of a truth so purely speculative as is the dogma of the Trinity, It is made possible, after all, by the fact that we are there freed from original sin, welcoming the grace of redemption offered to us by Christ.

.

This doctrine is not a simple biblical exegesis, but it has slowly gained in history and has been clarified and specified over the centuries with the help of the Fathers, the Doctors and the Saints, under the guidance of the Magisterium of the Church, especially in the Council of Orange 529 [Denz. 371-372], and the great Councils Fourth Lateran and Trent, where he assumed a form definitive dogmatic, which since then has not been further investigated, even by Vatican II, which is limited to assume the traditional doctrine. This doctrine is now entrusted to Catechism of the Catholic Church [NN. 396-406]. At the same time the data revealed that it expresses urges theologians to always new explanations and information and urges them to ask new questions, leading to an ever increasing knowledge of God's Word.

.

Progress historical-critical exegesis, especially since the nineteenth century, They have been of great help to the Church to correct certain popular naivete, clarify the literary genre of the Genesis story, the history of its drafting, the dell'agiografo relationships with extra-biblical contemporary cultures, per separate the historical and theological core by coating symbolic and mythological, to overcome a cosmological vision evidently overtaken by modern scientific progress, especially in relation to the data of the theory of evolution. They helped the understanding of the dogma of original sin even the philosophical and theological progress made since the nineteenth century, especially with the Thomistic revival promoted by Pope Leo XIII, the progress of metaphysics concerning the nature of good and evil, of natural theology regarding the creation of the world, the progress of anthropology about the nature of man and woman, the progress of psychology and moral theology on the nature of free will, accountability, of consciousness, of sin, of guilt and grace.

.

The darkness of the biblical data, the apparent naivete of the Genesis story - a pair placed in a garden of delights tempted by a snake eating a forbidden fruit - , its apparent contrast with the data of science on the origin of man [5] and its apparent absurdity, a sin that is transmitted by biological or generation of a good God, but it allows evil, all these difficulties were always opportunity for the doctrine of original sin has been misunderstood, until, Oh, in many different ways falsified rifiutata.

.

THE DESIGN OF THE WHITE AND THE THOUGHT OF THE CHURCH

.

In this article we look at the position of Enzo Bianchi. He considers himself a "Catholic" and claims to expose the vision that the Church has of original sin, giving to understand that it would not accept more that we find exposed in Catechism of the Catholic Church. We would then ask Enzo Bianchi on which the "Church" speaks, since it is not that of Catechism. Actually Bianchi hardly exposes the doctrine of the true Church, but a false church, which is that of the modernists.

.

The original sin Bianchi presents a conception that, as I said, masquerading as a doctrine of the Church, but which in reality, as you can be easily verified by consulting Catechism, It is exactly the opposite of what the Church teaches and is therefore completely false. He begins by mocking the Genesis story like a fairy tale for children:

.

"Needless to say, the Bible does not say where he was from evil. I hope none of you remember this little story told we were telling everyone that there would be an angel who has turned to God, God has fallen and this has become the devil, the devil tempts us, the world was beautiful, was gold, he walked from morning to sunset. Indeed the sun never came because there was no darkness. Then those two poor things of Adam and Eve have done that thing and pay us after I do not know how many millions of years "[cf. Enzo Bianchi, WHO].

.

It explains:

.

"But when you say original sin today the Church, attention to this, It does not mean the sin of the origins and later caused a disaster forever, but sin that is to the origins of each of us, of our existence, our freedom and our right to decide; this is evil "[cf. Enzo Bianchi, WHO].

.

"No original sin in the sense of a sin committed at the beginning. That the Catholic Church does not say more. But the original sin that dwells in every man emerges every time we touch, in communication or in connection with the things. In front of a tree symbol of all things, man and woman feel tempted "[cf. Enzo Bianchi, WHO].

.

"The Church is no longer on these positions. The Church does not read the original sin in the prehistory of men. This is now nonsense. More no one dares say this. But original sin is read as the sin that is in the fibers of every man who comes into the world "[cf. Enzo Bianchi, WHO].

.

On the contrary, the Catechism presents original sin just as sin committed by a human couple really existed, progenitor of the whole human species, created by God in his image and likeness, rebelled against the divine prohibition to take his place in the deciding of good and evil [nn.396-399] [6]. Original sin, so, it is not a sin which is at the origin of our personal lives, as if it were an act our, but it is at the origin of mankind.

.

Original sin is not the first sin we make in our personal history, reached the age of reason. The biblical account is not, as also believe Karl Rahner and Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, an 'aetiological myth ", to explain by referring to the past what happens in this. The guilt of original sin, in which we are born, It's not our fault, but a sin that we inherited from our first parents. For how could it be our fault, If at birth we still have not reached the age of reason?

.

According to the dogma of the Church, which clarifies the doctrine of St. Paul, the guilt of original sin is not only a personal fault of their ancestors, but it is collective guilt of all humanity, guilt that, when committed by ancestors, It is transmitted to all humanity generation born from Adam, so everyone, except the Blessed Virgin Mary, free of original sin, It is conceived by the mother affection and stained by this original and hereditary guilt, independently of the will of the individual, still incapable of discernment, guilt from which it free Baptism.

.

And if it is true that Christ never speaks precisely of the order, and the effect of Baptism reason, except to say that cleanses from sin and grants salvation, and never mentions the original sin, the very fact that orders to baptize every person, It is the implicit admission of the existence in each of us of original sin, guilt that precisely is removed from Baptism.

.

The transmission of original sin, involving and infects the whole of humanity, It supposes a corporate conception of human nature, if it were not just a collection of people, but a single person or a single person [7], a “super-person” composed of people, without excluding all the singularity, the autonomy and the responsibility of individuals in.

.

This conception of humanity appears clearly in its Pauline thought is sinful humanity as a result of original sin ["In Adam all have sinned"], [RM 5,12] [8] and both in its conception of humanity santa, that the Church as a "mystical body" of the Lord, "Bride of Christ". That is why St. Thomas Aquinas explains that original sin is not so much the sin of that individual, but rather it is a sin of human nature, sin nature, like saying that if a man sin by hand, it is he himself who sins [9]. Like this, with regard to original sin in so and so is the same humanity to sin in them. Or - Thomas makes another comparison - we say that a watercourse is polluted because it is polluted at the source. Of course, it's simple comparisons, that, as do light, They can not remove the darkness of the mystery. The historical fact of original sin is a pure datum of divine Revelation. The reason comes to understand the essence of the evil of guilt and punishment, He understands that this is a consequence of that; He understands that the existence of evil is not necessary, but it is something accidental and contingent.

.

Starting from his false assumption, then you understand as Bianchi fails to explain why all of us, though born good, as created by God, and given the power to choose between good and evil, inevitably become bad; and not finding a solution, complains that the Bible a mistake that is his alone.

.

Bianchi So here evidently confuses two things. An account is the original sin, parents' sin, that touches our origins and whose fault is spreading throughout humanity. It is one thing to our innate inclination to sin, - lust - which is a consequence of original sin. Bianchi says so that the church would have dropped like a "stupid" and a "lack of intelligence unpardonable", the story of the creation of Adam in paradise, with preternatural gifts, happy, immortal and innocent, in communion with God. Dice:

.

"The Church does not read the original sin in the prehistory of men. This is now nonsense. More no one dares say this. But original sin is read as the sin that is in the fibers of every man who comes into the world. If you want quell'incapacità is always doing good. At a certain point, evil enters us " [cf. Enzo Bianchi, WHO].

.

But just see what the Catechism He teaches to make sure of the words of falsehood Bianchi. He says the Catechism referring to the sin of our first parents:

.

"The man, tempted by the devil, he left off in his heart the trust towards his Creator and, abusing his freedom, He disobeyed God's command. In what was to man's first sin [cf. Rom 5,19]. Afterwards, every sin would be disobedience toward God and lack of trust in his goodness " [n. 397].

.

Moreover, because of its denial of the historicity of original sin, Bianchi ends up conceiving the human tendency to evil not as a result of the original Fall, but as intrinsic to human nature itself, with dire consequences for the evil man and man, Why, While this is natural, become well, because good is what is second nature. It follows then a horrible consequence: that the sin becomes good action and good deed becomes sin. No longer it distinguished what is second nature from that which is against nature:. From here probably overindulgence Bianchi against the sodomy.

.

He says Bianchi:

.

"The tale we all know and that the man and the woman. Humanity in its duality in to relate with things, in living existence. Show to choose evil and do not choose the good. Do not read that story as if it were the origin of our history. It would indeed be an unforgivable lack intelligence. The story of Genesis wants to tell the reality of man, of every man who comes into the world, of every woman who comes into the world. It is located in a world where there is already evil. There is already the snake, before the man. It was already there. There was already bad. And the man in her life and lets you choose evil " [cf. Enzo Bianchi, WHO].

.

For Bianchi, as we have already seen, the tendency to sin is not proper to fallen human nature from a primitive state of innocence, but it is inherent in human nature itself. But if evil is naturally in humans, then evil is natural and it is not bad. So, thinking that Christ deliver us from evil is an illusion or a flaw. Bianchi takes the presence of death and hostilities of nature are no consequences or punishment of a sin we have committed to basics, because evil was already there before sin. Dice:

.

"With the knowledge of the sciences that we, we know that the first man's evil reign in nature even before: the wolf ate the lamb. Even before, the chain of life went on through the death of some for others to live. There was no harm our introduction. The evil was. And certainly evil preceded us: the snake, Satan, the devil and then the names are many. But evil was " [cf. Enzo Bianchi, WHO].

.

We respond by saying that it is true that evil there was already a result of the angel's sin and it is true that the death of the living infra-humans has historically preceded the appearance of man on earth. This second figure is the science, while the first is a matter of Revelation. From Scripture we know that evil originated from the rebellion of some angels to God [AP 12, 7-9]. But what about the death of the living infra-humans, it is natural; in fact it is already present in Eden. It is a consequence of human sin. The infra-human living to serve humanity as nourishment.

.

Inalready, regarding our death, Revelation teaches that it is a consequence of original sin, although it too would be natural in itself [10]. Ma, as taught by the Council of Trent [Denz, 1511], Eden possessed a grace of immortality, we have lost through sin. Indeed, the first parents in Eden were immortal. And also, according to Revelation, the death, from which Christ saves us, It draws its origin from the first angel's sin [Sap 2,24] [11] beginning of creation.

.

Also of note that Pius XII in the encyclical The human race the 1950 [Denz. 3897] It reiterates that it is necessary to admit the existence historical of a couple, from which all humanity originated, otherwise it would have been impossible to transmit the original sin to all mankind, which is part of the dogma of original sin.

.

For as the saying Catechism:

.

"Adam has transmitted to us a sin, by which all are born contaminated " [n,403]. "All men are implicated in Adam's sin, as well as all are implicated in Christ's justice " [n.404]. St. Paul makes it clear that, if it were not for Adam with his sin, there would be no Christ, because Christ repair Adam's sin [RM 5, 12-20]. "Adam and Eve committed a personal sin, but this sin affected the human nature, that they transmit in a fallen condition. It is a sin which will be transmitted by propagation to all mankind, that is, with the transmission of a human nature deprived of original holiness and justice. Because of this, original sin is called "sin" in an analog mode: is a contract not a sin and sin, a state and not an act "⦋ibid.⦌. It is not affected by a conscious act of the subject, as if this was responsible, but simply getting the grace of Baptism, allocable even at a baby ' [ibid.].

.

White acknowledges that God can not will sin, ie the evil of guilt; it is deficient when it comes to punishment or divine punishment, in which God inflicts a just penalty. In the name of mercy, Bianchi does not want to admit the punitive justice, that seems unworthy cruelty of God's Love. Undoubtedly the punishment of sin is precisely the evil that the sinful pulls him with his sin.

.

However, we know as the Bible speaks frankly "God's punishment, without any need to judge the sign of an archaic theology or exceeded, because the severity is also God in Christ. So this can only refer to the logical and necessary consequence of sin, that disturbs the order established by God himself in things, though God, in his goodness has in some cases the possibility to suspend or cancel it.

.

THE PROBLEM OF EVIL [12]

.

The question of original sin is certainly linked the problem of the nature and origin of evil, because sin is to do evil. And the evil of punishment is the consequence of sin. Bianchi stands several times to the second question, moreover falsely declaring, as we have seen, that the Bible does not give an answer, when in fact there is already an answer, however imperfect, supplied by philosophy, although obviously not up to the answer which comes from Scripture.

.

But the major shortcoming of Bianchi is not tell us what is evil, evil of punishment and guilt evil. Indeed we see that he has a wrong notion of evil, when he says that the serpent of Genesis is the "evil". Not at all. The snake, as he should know, It is the symbol of an evil spirit creature, created before man, ie the devil, as clearly he taught the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 ⦋Denz. 800⦌.

.

Bianchi, with this serious misunderstanding, thus it proves to hypostatize O substantiate Evil, falling exactly that Manichaeism, he says it will avoid. Thus jointly and it denies that the sin of man draws his chance from the angel's sin, refusing, we saw it, as silly fairy tale this truth of faith, which is also taught by that Council [ibid.], Truth extremely enlightening and useful for our way of salvation, because it teaches our duty to be vigilant and beware of pitfalls, illusions, by attacks, deceptions and temptations from the Devil, without fearing his threats, or leave us confused by his accusations and his reproaches, there insinuate false guilt, and without succumbing to its allurements and seductions, They harden in sin, blind us to arrogance and pride, and without being disturbed by his scare, they want to throw us into despair.

.

The most serious question of evil, in order to be taken seriously, with hope of success, without being in the dark, It requires, as already Aristotle teaches us, recourse to metaphysics, because it touches the question of 'being and non-being, of the position and of the negation-deprivation, Specific themes of metaphysics. Now Bianchi unfortunately proves to be made of completely ignorant metaphysical. And therein lies the cause of his serious mistakes on the question of evil.

.

Thus the above-mentioned clumsy substantialization or reification evil wrought by Enzo Bianchi, throws it into a very serious difficulties, which it seems not to notice, the same difficulty to say the absurdity of Manichaeism, and that is that, if evil is a substance, there is no remedy to it. In fact it is possible to remedy the evil, precisely because it is not a substance, and there is not necessarily, but it is accidental and precisely a deprivation [13], a lack of good or entities, which can be remedied by affixing the missing well. Of course, a subject or a harmful substance may be destroyed or prevented from harming. The murderess can be executed. But evil, from which then we are freed, It is not the subject as such, ontologically, my he damage made by the subject.

.

The bad part of the not be, although it is designed as if it were to be, ad figure being [being of reason]. Which obviously does not mean that evil is nothing or that it does not exist or is only apparent or a subjective fact and has no influence on reality. [14]. Far from it. Tremendous is the deadly and destructive power of evil. But it is precisely the negation, and more precisely as deprivation of being. But if evil, as it seems to believe Bianchi, It is a substance, if it exists or subsists in itself and not in a subject, It is not bad, but good. It must be remembered that the substance itself, ontologicamente, it's good. There are bad substances by essence. As a villain in it can not be that its action, but not its being. A substance may be harmful, but in itself, as body, it's good. And being a good turn, according to the known principle transcendental.

.

Already philosophy, physically and morally, confirmed by the Christian Revelation, although much less perfectly of Revelation, He tells you what is evil, which it is the cause and what are the effects. It also tells how to remove it. Christ, on the supernatural level of faith and life of grace, It is the Divine Physician, that, through his Church, We tell us what disease we, how we've taken and what we must do to heal.

.

If God had willed, He could create a world free from evil. He could prevent the angel to sin. He could prevent Adam and Eve to sin. If they had sinned, He could forgive quickly, without that evil is extended to all mankind. Why it didn't?

.

This is the impenetrable mystery, hidden away infinity of wisdom, of goodness and divine freedom, no mystery “detectable” to us for its transcendence. There is a reason why God wanted to allow the existence of evil, though he is innocent, because He does nothing without reason. But only he knows. Trust us [15]. The great and incomprehensible mystery, therefore, It is not exactly what is evil, Where is he from, it produces and how it takes off - on these points Bianchi shows a deplorable ignorance and contempt for the Divine Revelation -, but it's why God allows evil, When, If she wanted to, He could have created a world without evil. However, evil does not necessarily exist with creation, but there is only the possibility of the existence of evil conditions, which are given by the existence of the creature free will.

.

Evil could not possibly exist if there was only God, because evil is related to the existence of creation. In fact, God is absolutely good and therefore can neither effect, nor suffer evil, which supposes instead an agent or patient finished, ie the creature. The finiteness but not bad; only ownership of a property over. However, the finiteness is the condition of the possibility that a spiritual subject does or suffers evil. Indeed evil is the lack of an asset due to a person liable, that, as such, that can not be finished, because only the finite can be deprived of his good or actively, why does evil or passively, because it suffers evil.

.

For who suffers evil must be finished, because only the finite can be deprived of his right. But the actor of evil must be finished, because only a finite agent can be bad acting, that is, deprive the patient's own good. Evil can be made or – harm – or suffered - pain.

.

The harmful act, that provides the patient bad penalty, It may be voluntary, and then we have sin, evil of guilt; for example a Adultery or a theft; or it can be involuntary - human or animal - and then we have the simple harm; for example the lion that kills the gazelle. However, if the man who does evil, flaw, ie disobeys the moral law, the lion kills the gazelle obeys the law of nature.

.

As for the man's death consequence and punishment of his sin, for the lion's death is a consequence of his nature. Evil can only have originated from a creature capable of disobeying God supreme Good, therefore endowed with free. Indeed, all the sub-human creatures do nothing but obey the laws of God, which they are always good.

.

If a mosquito bites you, do not complain, because it does nothing but his duty, although no one forbids to kill her. If anything can be said that Eden mosquitoes had respect for man. The hostility of nature against man is indeed not intrinsic to nature itself, as it seems to assume Bianchi, but it is a consequence of original sin [Gen 3,17-18]. God did not create an evil nature, but she has become a mother, "stepmother" in punishment of original sin.

.

Evil, then, is not a substance, it is not an absolute, the less a deity, but it is a simple accidental lack of good, which you could be remedied with the contribution of the missing well. Evil exists because there is good, that is made worse by bad. Instead, the good in itself could exist even without the bad. Evil exists because there is a subject in which there is. If the subject is corrupt, even evil disappears. If this one dies of cancer, the cancer disappears, but only because that person is dead. Already philosophical reason then knows that in principle the evil may be taken away and won. Evil is a result of a lawsuit, whereby, removed the cause, you could eliminate evil.

.

The reason also knows that God, in his infinite goodness, he cannot have wanted evil and therefore it must have been caused by an original fault of the creature, perhaps man. Plato thought that we are now in darkness and injustice because of a fall occurred in the past as a happy state, in which we contemplated the truth and the good. Of this ancestral guilt we smell, according to Plato, for the fact that now we are born with an inclination to sin irresistible, be subject to suffering. Such a thing is not normal: You should be born good and happy. It must therefore - suggests Plato - have happened, the origin of mankind, a tragedy, for which it has plunged in the current state of blindness, of misery and mischief.

.

Divine Revelation takes, It clarifies and corrects the ancient pagan view, showing better the nature and severity of this early fall, and its consequences. But above all - and here lies the most revealing element - Scripture, the interpretation of the Church, gives to humanity in Christ the means and ways to break free from his ancestral misery and tendency to evil, to rediscover the original plan of creation, high from the Christian prospect of divine filiation.

.

The suffering, as a consequence of original sin It is transformed by Christ into an instrument of atonement and way of salvation. From repugnant becomes lovable. Not sure lovable itself, but for Christ's sake. From condemnation it becomes a response of love to the love of the One who gave Himself to deliver us from suffering and sin. It is always an evil that must be fought. And yet it should not be rejected by any means, ma, the occasion should be welcomed for the sake of Christ as the way to make us saints. Only sin must be rejected absolutely, since, says a liturgical hymn, "Nails of the Cross, although hard, They are sweet".

.

This is what he thinks and announcing His Beatitude Emeritus Prior of Bose Enzo Bianchi, who just finished his preaching to the world the clergy at Ars, He rushed to Rome, to talk to young people, then to attend the first “Synod of freedom”, if it considers that, as he himself says: "There is a great freedom of intervention that I have not experienced in previous synods" [cf. WHO]. But, in this climate of “freedom” why s ’ was seen before, He tells us that they did not order, those who think differently …

.

… «Oh Freedom, what crimes are committed in thy name!». Oh, freedom, how many crimes are committed in thy name! [Marie-Jeanne Roland de la Platiere: 1734-1793].

This, It is the end that made!

.

Varazze, 19 October 2018

.

.

 

______________________

NOTE

.

[1] I illustrate in my book The mystery of the Redemption, Editions ESD, Bologna 2004.

[2] CF. C.V.Heris, The mystery of Christ, Publishing Morcelliana, Brescia 1938.

[3]The doctrine of merit, denied by Bianchi in the wake of Luther, It is dogmatically taught by the Council of Trent [Denz.1545-1550].

[4] CF. Catechism of the Catholic Church [nn.166-172].

[5] M.-J. Nicolas, Evolutionism and Christianity. Of Teilhard de Chardin to S.Tommaso d'Aquino, Publishing Massimo, Milan 1978.

[6] CF. Erlangen Paul II, I believe. Wednesday catechesis by Sandro Beetles, Piemme editions, 1988, vol.IV, nn.4-5.

[7] CF. Heribert Muehlen, A person Mystica, Publishing New Town, Rome 1968.

[8] CF. my book The mystery of redemption, Editions ESD, Bologna 2004, pp.29-56.

[9] Of bad, q.4,a.6; In II Sent., Dist.31, q.1,a,1.

[10] S. Pius V in 1567 condemned Michele Baio, who argued that immortality was due to the state of innocence [Denz. 1921,1926, 1978].

[11] CF. (C). Journet-J,Maritain, Philippe of the Trinity, The angel's sin. Peccabilitas, nature and supernatural, Beauchesne, Paris 1961.

[12] CF. St. Thomas, Evil. disputed Questions, edited by G.Cavalcoli and R.Coggi, vol.VI, Editions ESD, Bologna 2002; C.Journet, Evil. theological Essay, Borla Publisher, Torino 1963.

[13] The steresis, of which Aristotle spoke.

[14] Luigi Pareyson, rightly affirming cha evil exists, It remains trapped in an inadequate conception of existence, it ends by arguing that evil is a reality, he fell in Manichaeism or at least in the Hegelian dialectic of this bad even in God, although Pareyson then try to make up by saying that God has "overcome evil in Himself". However Pareyson least has the merit that he understood that the question of evil is above all a metaphysical question, while the mature catholic '' Bultmannian Enzo Bianchi still alive in the world of fairy tales. Cf book Pareyson, however, nice and deep, Ontology of Freedom. The evil and suffering, Publishing house Einaudi, Torino 2000.

[15] CF. J.Maritain, God and the permission of evil, Paris 1963.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

 

The Synod of the young. the Church, after the Shoah of the catholic world, will be judged to the new Process of Nuremberg, where cardinals and bishops will reply to the judges: “I only obeyed the higher orders”.

— ecclesial news —

THE SYNOD OF THE YOUNG. THE CHURCH, AFTER THE SHOAH OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, WILL BE JUDGED TO THE NEW PROCESS OF NUREMBERG, WHERE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS WILL REPLY TO THE JUDGES: “I ONLY OBEYED THE HIGHER ORDERS”.

.

In the most inappropriate historical-ecclesial moment, a Youth Synod is taking place, while the visible Church, after the Holocaust of Catholicism, is about to end up in the Nuremberg court, which will issue a sentence that will remain written in history. In the course of this process, the culprits who brought the Church into the court of justice before the eyes of the world will be judged for committing great crimes against the Church, the mystical body of Christ [cf. With the 1, 12-20]. And as happened seventy years ago with the Nazi leaders, we will hear cardinals and bishops, respond to the judges: “I only obeyed the higher orders”.

.

article in the original Italian version

.

PDF article print format

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Italian presbyter

The impression one has is that the synods are probably set up as the Assembly of Deputies of the Soviet Union, or as it is now the Parliament of North Korea. We admit that we can also discuss within the synods, as happened during the Synod on the family. Naturally, that we proceed to discuss, the synods are celebrated precisely for this purpose. What is the purpose of the discussions, however, when in the final document, previously, we have seen the approval of what the Synod Fathers have rejected decisively and with a broad threshold? In fact, if the Court of Miracles, as I call it, or the Magic Circle, as Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller calls it, already has a ready and approved program, what is the usefulness of synods? Perhaps saving the appearance of collegiality in the same way that the young dictator of North Korea, Kim Jong, wants to have a semblance of parliamentary democracy? And what happened to the dissidents of Korea, maybe they ended up tied on the missiles and then launched during the experimental tests?

.

We come to the agenda of the Court of Miracles or the Magic Circle : the Youth Synod will have to serve, as already amply demonstrated, to offer some recognition to the LBGT lobby. And although the youth representatives have never used or mentioned this acronym in their programmatic documents, the mention was made by His Eminence Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisserri, without neglecting to express himself in an imprecise and contradictory way, which in some way is tantamount to lying [see HERE]

.

The use of the acronym LGBT, which means: lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual, is first of all a question of form and law, which later could have implications in the doctrine and the magisterium. Let’s try to understand: if in the work Ai organizations Commentary — which has nothing to do with gays, but with the famous jurist Gaius who compiled his comments the year 180 a.C. — the problem of oral sex had been inserted according to the jurisprudence of the principality of Augustus, dating back to 30 b.C., this erotic practice would then have a legal status in the system of Roman law. However, considering that the problem of oral sex does not exist in the law, it can not be inserted as a legal institution, even applying other laws in the most extensive form. And it does not exist because, in the law, there is no such thing as the legal institution of oral coitus. Jurisprudence can not treat or regulate what for the law does not exist. That’s why in any kind of juridical system, both in Roman law and in common law, the use of words and terms is always very delicate, because the law, long before punishment, which is only the final act, aims to recognize , establish and then adjust. And a term inserted into juridical language automatically becomes a juridic term.

.

To this must be added, as an example, a fact that few in the visible Church of today can deny: in many Catholic theological institutes, when we speak of the Most Holy Eucharist, the theologies and terminologies drawn from Lutheran lexicon, are increasingly used; for example, the Lutheran terminology of consubstantiation. If in some Roman Pontifical universities one dares to refer to scholasticism and Thomism, then to the theological term of transubstantiation, one risks being derided or indicated as pre-conciliar (!?). And the mockers, whose prerogative is the most stupid ignorance, will continue to ignore that one of the two Supreme Pontiffs of the Second Vatican Council, the one who managed it, has brought forward and then closed, the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, that soon will also be canonized, he defined as opportune and not replaceable this theological term of transubstantiation [Encyclical The Mystery of the Faith, no. 47, text HERE]. Or perhaps we must deduce that Blessed Pontiff Paul VI was actually a pre-conciliar? As I have written several times: in the visible Church of today the decrees of beatification and canonization of the Roman Pontiffs are signed with one hand, with the other the documents that strike, or in some cases annul, their supreme magisterium.

.

Today we live in a visible Church where we can define the term of transubstantiation as scholastic-archaeological, then reject it in the halls of the pontifical universities. However, at the same time, we can insert ecclesiastical lexical terms such as LBGT, with the risk that this acronym luciferian assumed by the vocabulary of the Magisterium of the Church. And all this, cannot disconcert only the Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, with all the coryphaeum of journalists True Pontifical, for which never, as «at the time of this epochal revolution», things had gone so well. The facts show that things, at the height of the Pontifical Russian Revolution, are so good that the churches are increasingly empty, the disappointed faithful, the depressed clergy and the missing vocations. The abandonment of the priesthood has never been as numerous as in the last five years of the history of the Church, even if the Congregation for the Clergy is silent on the statistical, because it is presided over by another friend of the Court of Miracles, or Magic Circle.

.

His Eminence Cardinal Charles Joseph Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia

Thanks be to God, His Excellency Mons. Charles Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia, made his voice heard and recalled the importance of using correct words [cf. chronicle: HERE, HERE], because at the level of Catholic doctrine, substance is linked to words. And this should be known by all those who have studied, even in a non-exhaustive way, the first great dogmatic councils of the Church, where, to define the nature of Christ God, we have resorted to precise terms modulated by terminology of Greeks philosophers, such as concept of ὑπόστασις [Hypostasis or hypostatic nature].

.

Someone, to define today — and therefore clarify — the various forms of exercise of human sexuality, since “male and female God created them” [Gen 1, 26-27], perhaps wants to insert into the ecclesial lexicon terms such as LGBT, thus giving life to a new quatripostatic human nature: to the lesbian nature, gay, bisexual and transsexual?

.

The Synod on the family has left a divided and disoriented Church, as well as several deaths due to sudden infarcts in the ranks of the Lord’s vineyard. And after the attempt to erase adultery, today the Synod of Youth has opened up, which seems to want to legitimize the various practices of sexual expression, without clarifying — as Archbishop Charles Chaput laments holyly — that LGBT Catholics cannot exist, and the Church cannot legitimize their existence. With another paradoxical example, we can ask: can a subject be defined as Catholic-atheist and claim, as atheist, his full membership in Catholicism? Yes, he can do it exactly to the extent that, a one transsexual proud of his transsexualism, he can call himself a catholic-transsexual and claim full right of citizenship in the body of the Catholic Church and claim full legitimacy of all his demands. Because if the enthusiastic singers of the «epochal revolution» had not noticed it, is completely new figure of Catholicism is born: the Catholic atheists. And these atheistic Catholics have a diabolical prerogative: to persecute the faithful believers fiercely.

.

Of the Archbishop by Philadelphia we invite you to read the article «Charity, clarity, and their opposite» [article, HERE]

.

We will see how this Synod will end, but above all we will see if, as in the previous one, what will be rejected by the Synodal Fathers will then end in the final document, if anything hidden, once again, in some ambiguous expression or footnote, which is equivalent to saying … “I am intelligent, you are stupids!”. But what counts is listening to everyone, giving the impression of being synodal, collegial and above all democratic, just like the Korean dictator Kim Jong, who first calls the puppet Parliament of North Korea, then does exactly what he wants.

.

After this Synod, opened with the insertion of the LGBT quatripostatic dogma, not required by anyone in the Instrument of Work, in 2019 the Amazonic Synod, will also open, for to discuss the granting of the priesthood to married men. Attention, everything only … to experiment. Meanwhile, in the Diocese of Rome, even if the fact has not made any news, the general rehearsals are already underway: a few days ago he was appointed “parish priest” of a metropolitan parish — of course: to experiment — a permanent deacon, arrived in canonical with his wife and four children. And this family nucleus, from the official page of the Deacons of Rome, which is also a filial of the Neocatechumenal Movement, has been indicated as … «diaconal family» (!?) [CF. service: HERE]. Having said this, I would like to know: can the members of my family, who have a presbyter in their family, be called the “presbyteral family”? And my mother and my brother can be called “presbyteral mother” and “presbyteral brother”. Obviously extending the title to my “presbyteral sister-in-law” and to my “presbyteral nephew”? And perhaps we want to forget my cat, which would have the title of “presbyteral cat”? Needless to say that the speech would be really long, because those who do not know the story is condemned to repeat it in a pejorative form. It is worth remembering, even if briefly and rapidly, that the diaconate, now called permanent, fell into disuse as an autonomous order and became a step in the process of presbyteral ordination. In fact, in Rome, between the eighth and tenth centuries, the deacons had acquired a pre-eminent role. The deacons were at the head of the main churches and did not even want to be ordained presbyters, because then, from these prestigious churches, they became directly bishops. The permanent diaconate will thus be restored only after a thousand years, by the Second Vatican Council. And note that not all the dioceses of the world have ordained permanent deacons, who are absent, for example, in most African countries, in order not to generate confusion among Catholic populations; and especially where, for anthropological and cultural reasons, the rules relating to the chastity of celibacy by priests are not always applied. In the heart of Europe, in Poland, the first two permanent deacons were ordained only four decades after the Second Vatican Council, in 2009.

.

Married priests have always existed in the Eastern Catholic clergy, but they could exercise their ministry only in the dioceses belonging to their rite; a rite regulated, among other things, also by the Code of Canon Law of the Eastern Churches. However, since great general tests are under way, many of these priests and their families have been received in various Italian dioceses, beginning with the Archdiocese of Perugia, whose archbishop is not a bishop among many, but the president of Episcopal Conference of Italy. Faced with this, I limit myself to asking: in the event of disputes involving a married priest, what right will be applied, the Latin or that of the Eastern Churches? Obviously I know well that the canon law has been replaced by pure free will, which then turns into authentic arrogance that comes to life from the lack of any rule, but the rhetorical question sounds good, and even if it is useless, I do the same. Regarding the possible incardination in the dioceses of the Latin rite, as may happen, the incardination of married priests of the Eastern rite, specifically Latinized, since they are useful for the general tests under way, which aim to please the Head and the circle of his most trusted advisors? All this could be explained by His Eminence Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, who is metropolitan archbishop of Perugia and president of the Italian bishops, and which houses two married priests in his diocese, to anticipate the decisions of the Synod of the Amazon, which we remember: the decisions have already been taken before the opening of the Synod [service HERE].

.

Having said this, a question arises: for the region of the Amazon, an experiment is asked to consecrate priests married men, because there is lack of clergy. In Rome, instead, for to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon, what a dramatic lack of clergy there is? Because looking at the diocesan yearbook we find that the metropolitan parishes are 332. The Roman presbytery has 1,256 presbyteries, to which are added 2,929 presbyters of other dioceses residing in Rome. To these secular priests, 5,317 members of the regular clergy (the presbyters of the various religious orders) and 87 other priests belonging to various personal prelatures are added [Official Yearbook of the Diocese of Rome: HERE]. In Rome there are therefore a total of about 9,580 presbyters, among Roman presbyters, presbyters residing in the diocese and presbyters of various religious families. The Diocese of Rome has about 2,350,000 baptized. If we divide the number of Catholic faithful with the number we will have this result: one priest for every 250 faithful. And all this in a Rome with increasingly empty churches. It is also good to specify that the territory of the Diocese of Rome is limited only to the Capital of Italy, because out of the city, in the Municipality of Rome, arise the suffragan dioceses. Question: was it therefore necessary, as an exotic experiment, to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon in the Mother and Mother Church of all the Catholic Churches? Therefore we note that while the Synod of Youth is being celebrated, the general rehearsals for the Amazon, from which the married priests will have to go out, to experiment, are already underway, because everything has already been established. I repeat: only to experiment and after convening the Pontifical Parliament of North Korea, where presumably dissidents end up on the heads of missiles fired during military exercises. Things are worse in Rome than in North Korea, never in the history of the Church has mercy made so many victims! A new term has also been born, not easily translatable: “the misericordiati“. And this term “be merciful” rhymes with “executed“, the sentenceds to death.

.

to open the video click on the image

If Cardinal Gerhard L. Müller, in a recent long interview with Raymond Arroyo, has returned to various topics: on the speech of the evil friends who surround the Roman Pontiff, who were sought by him with the lantern of Diogenes; therefore on the argument that His Excellency Monsignor Carlo Maria Viganò, did not say anything other than the truth [cf. HERE, HERE], this happened because the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is a true man of God. Add to what the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, at the anthropological level, contains in himself the strength of the Teutonic barbarian, in the noblest sense of the term. In fact, we remember that when the barbarians descended from northern Europe while the Roman empire was in agony, they found the holders of power, drunk and made up by women, engaged in playing inside the alcoves with young men [cf. my previous article, HERE]. Or, in other words: the Romans, during the decadence of the Empire, lived a LBGT lifestyle that had long absorbed the S.P.Q.R. lifestyle, an acronym that once summarized the concept and foundation of The Roman Senate citizens and later SPQR [Senate of the Roman People]. The difference, as I have often emphasized, was that the barbarians, struck by the virile temperament of the great Fathers of the Church, in that climate of total decadence, they were converted, in mass, to Christianity. In today’s Rome, the new barbarians, from whom should they be conquered to Christianity? Perhaps by four homosexuals clinging like polyps to the throne, to which all in all they are very useful, being the most devoted ruffians, the most interested servants, the most efficient spies, as well as easily managed and manipulated by the sovereign, who knows, one after the other , all the rotten corpses that remain locked up in their graves? And their tombs are very different from those of the ancient Pharisees [cf. Mt 23, 27-32], because the tombs of the Pharisees were at least well painted on the outside.

.

I am afraid that no one has analyzed the historical relationship that links the psychology of Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller to the history of his native country, which is Germany. Today the situation of the visible Church is comparable to the defeat of Germany in 1945, with Adolf Hitler locked up in the bunker of Berlin, along with the restricted court of his faithful, while faced with the defeat, the German army continued to fight, up to enlist teenagers of sixteen. To deceive the German people, word spread that the Great Secret Weapon would soon be completed and used. In the same way, today, the main propagandists of Pontifical Truth, not so much defend the indefensible — which can also be understandable and even justifiable on a human and psychological level — but show total insensitivity, while knowing all the details of the lives of many saints priests who have been totally marginalized and ruined, for not having accepted to become accomplices of a diabolical system of corruption, preferring to go to great suffering, without betraying the Church of Christ and coming to terms with evil. And this makes some Italian journalists of True Pontifical, unscrupulous men, real criminals deprived of basic Christian sentiments. So it is good to inform these people that the bridge over the river now overflows with patients spectators who await the passage of their bodies dragged by the current, when with an ease that would scandalize even the lowest level whores, after the next conclave, like chameleons they will change skin color. The is that instead they will not have to change color, they will have to change jobs, because in the face of every sigh, all the writings with which they have sustained the untenable and defended the indefensible, to the detriment of the truth and the innocent affected and injured, will be taken and thrown publicly on their faces. These journalists of Pontifical Truth have not even hesitated to falsify facts and news. They spread false news and concealed the truth to the detriment of the victims and the suffering of many holy priests. They “licked the ass” of the executioners, showing total indifference towards the victims affected and persecuted within the Church, of whom they knew very well the stories and the great sufferings. And all this, it is not simply inhumane, because it is really satanic. And the devil can never be allowed to enter through the window again, having thrown it out the door; and if by chance the Devil asks for forgiveness by pretending to be repentant, one must absolutely not believe him, because he is the Supreme Prince of Lies and deception.

.

After Adolf Hitler’s death, Germany was hit by a wave of suicides; whole families committed suicide. The most common phrase that ran between the good Germans which we remember were many — was: «I’m ashamed to be German». I have already heard this kind of phrase in private from bishops and presbyters many times: «Faced with this situation, I am ashamed to belong to this Church», implying that this shame is entirely linked to the ecclesial and ecclesiastical structure of this visible Church, certainly not to the mystery of the Church, which is the mystical Body of Christ.

.

As we know, from the Berlin bunker, we then moved on to the Nuremberg trial, where the main Nazi leaders were judged and condemned on the charred body of the Führer, but above all on the ruins of Germany. And many of the Nazi leaders were sentenced to death in that trial. Seventy-three years after the last great world war, the New Church of Mercy has removed the more remote and exceptional hypothesis of the death penalty from the Catechism. Therefore, if tomorrow something similar to the Nuremberg trial were to happen, we will be “merciful” to those responsible for the death of millions and millions of people, and we will entrust them to social services [cf. our previous articles: HERE, HERE, HERE].

.

The Nuremberg trial is about to be repeated in the Church. Tomorrow, sooner or later, on the disastrous ruins of destruction, while bishops and priests will tell the world «I am ashamed to belong to this Church», we will see before the judges an army of cardinals and bishops who will try to justify themselves by saying: «I only obeyed higher orders!». While the journalists of the former Pontifical Truth, who can no longer recycle themselves, will say on their side: «We have only written what we have been ordered to write!». Then the judges will ask: «Your Excellency … Your Eminence … Monsignor … but you realize that your obedience to the higher orders has covered the perpetrators of serious crimes and has seriously affected the innocent, subjected to every kind of suffering and anguish?» At that point the answer will be: «But I was bound by the pontifical secret!».

.

The death of Christ the Lord, in its substance, is renewed, and over time it is proposed in different ways. Not by chance, his glorious body, after the resurrection, still lives with the signs of passion. So today Christ died again on the cross because bishops and cardinals have «obeyed the higher orders», and when in the day of their judgment, God will ask them: «why did not you act in defense of the Church and of the People of God?». They will answer: «But I was bound by pontifical secrecy!».

.

It’s just a matter of little time. We let this monster give the last dangerous and deadly blows, because soon we will be in the great hall of Nuremberg, to listen to those directly responsible for the Holocaust of the Catholic Church that they say: «I have only obeyed the higher orders!». And we, precisely because of profound and authentic mercy, will guarantee them the expiatory grace of the gallows. Because we who today are suffering, anguished and persecuted in our home, we are the salvation and the future of the Church of Christ, of the pilgrim Church on earth. And no one will ever prevent us from fulfilling our mission for Christ, with Christ and in Christ. Because the church is of Christ, it is not of Peter, who is the Vicar of Christ, not his Successor. And the power given to Peter is not at all total and absolute as some would have us believe, indeed: it is a very vincolated power. The power of Peter is strictly vincolated to the deposit of the Catholic faith, of Tradition and of doctrine. Peter is not the absolute master of the Church, on the contrary: he is his first and faithful servant, called to guard the truth and to confirm his brothers in faith [cf. Page 22, 31-34]. Peter’s mission, is not to convene the “democratic” Parliament of North Korea. Peter’s mission is not to confuse the People of God, using ambiguous and unclear words, because Christ teaches us: «But let your statement be, “Yes, yes” or “No, no”; anything beyond these is of Evil» [cf. Mt 5, 37].

.

In the Holy Gospels, everything is very clear, no any “sly” has ever inserted ambiguous small footnotes. Having said this, it is still necessary to clarify: it is true, no priest, bishop or cardinal is obliged to be a hero. But for a priest, a bishop or a cardinal, it is certainly not a great human and Christian honor to be a rabbit who, opposite the judgment of history, replies: «I only obeyed the higher orders».

.

Rome, 7 October 2018

.

I apologize to the Readers if there were errors in my English translation.

.

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

 

The Synod of youth. The church, after the Holocaust of the Catholic world, It will be judged in the new Nuremberg Trials, where the cardinals and bishops will respond: 'But I only obeyed orders from above ! »

- ecclesial news -

THE SYNOD OF YOUTH. THE CHURCH, AFTER THE HOLOCAUST OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, It WILL BE HELD IN NEW PROCESS OF NUREMBERG, WHERE THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS MEET THE COURTS: "BUT I HAVE ONLY obeyed OF OVER !»

.

When more inappropriate historical and ecclesial was held a synod of young people while the visible Church, after the Holocaust of Catholicism, It is going to end up on the dock at the Nuremberg trial, that on you will issue a ruling that will remain written in history. In the course of this process we will be judged one after the other all those on trial have led the visible church under the eyes of the world, after the commission of serious crimes consumed to the detriment of the Church the Mystical Body of Christ [cf. With the 1, 12-20]. And as happened seventy years ago, We feel cardinals and bishops meet: "I just obeyed the orders from above!»

.English version – English version

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

Doing process any intentions, the feeling one gets is that the synods are likely to be set as it was the Assembly of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union, or as it is now in the parliament of North Korea. Let us assume that within the synods can also discuss, as it happened during the Synod on the family. Of course, is being discussed, Synods are used for this purpose. What, however, they serve threads, then when the final document was seen approve what the Synod Fathers had rejected so also agreed and a large majority? If in fact the Court of Miracles, as I call it, or the Magic Circle, as Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller calls it instead, He has already prepared an agenda with a whole range of issues already established, but above all in fact already approved, because convene synods? Perhaps to give the semblance of collegiality in the same way in which the young dictator of North Korea, Kim Jong, He wants to give a semblance of parliamentary democracy? And what happened to the Korean dissidents, They are perhaps finished tied on the heads of the missiles launched then below for the experimental tests?

.

We come all’agenda from the Court of Miracles O Magic Circle : the Synod of young people will have to serve, as has already been amply demonstrated, to clear the LBGT lobby. And although the representatives of young people have never used or referenced in this acronym in their policy documents, There has, however, provided the Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisserri, not failing to express themselves imprecise and contradictory, which in some ways it seems tantamount to lying [please refer to chronicle, WHO].

.

The mention of Acronym LGBT, which as we know means lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender, It is above all a matter of form and law, which subsequently will then have implications not indifferent in terms of doctrine and magisterium. Let's try to understand: if you work Ai organizations Commentarywhich incidentally has nothing to do with gays, but with the famous jurist Gaius who compiled their own commentaries in 180 about d.C. - it had been added to the problem of oral copulation according to the case law of the late principality Augusteo, from the year 30 circa a.C, is obvious that this pleasant erotic practice would first rank and dignity in the Roman legal system of law. Whereas, the problem of oral copulation, It does not exist in law and in fact in the case; I doubt there also can be reached, including implementation in the most extensive form other laws. It does not exist because, Always law and fact, there is precisely the legal institution of oral copulation. The law can not in fact treat or regulate what the law does not exist. That's why in any kind of legal system, both in those of the Roman plant both in those based on common law, the use of words and terms is always very delicate, because the Law, long before punish - the punishment is in fact only the extreme final act conclusive -, It aims to recognize, to establish, then to regulate.

.

Add to this, Always by way of example, a fact that few within the visible Church today can deny: in many Catholic theological institutes, for example by treating the Holy Eucharist, They are increasingly used theologies and terminology taken from the Lutheran lexicon, from consubstantiation. If certain Roman pontifical universities one dares to refer to the school and to Thomism, then at the end of transubstantiation, He runs the risk of being mocked or referred to as pre-reconcile (!?). E, the scoffers, prerogative of which it is the most crass ignorance, will step forward to ignore that one of the two Popes of Vatican II, the very one who has managed the, brought forward and then closed, the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, that day will be canonized, has defined as appropriate and non-replaceable this term theological [Encyclical The Mystery of the Faith, n. 47, text WHO]. And what we are we to infer that Blessed Pope Paul VI was in actual fact a pre-conciliar? But, as I wrote several times, in today's visible Church will sign with one hand the decree of beatification and canonization of the Roman Pontiffs, with the other hand they rather sign documents affecting, or in some cases zero, their supreme magisterium.

.

The fact that today we live in a visible Church in which you can define how the term transubstantiation school archeological, then reject it or contest it in the classrooms of the pontifical universities, but at the same time, however, they fit into the ecclesiastical vocabulary terms such as LBGT, with the risk that this Luciferian acronym then enter into the vocabulary of the Magisterium of the Church, can not touch and not just rattle Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, below with all the coryphaeus of Journalists true Pontificia for which ever, as "the time of this epochal revolution", things had gone so well. And that things, Russian Revolution in full Pontifical go well like never before had gone, prove increasingly empty churches, the lost and disillusioned believers, the clergy in disarray, the fall in vocations, abandonments priesthood as numerous as ever over the past five years, but on which, however, it is silent on a statistical level, the Congregation for the Clergy, chaired by another friend of Court of Miracles, O Magic Circle.

.

S. AND. Mons. Charles Joseph Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia

Like this, of The Assembly of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union Pontifical It has dawned, thank God, the voice of S.It is. Mons. Charles Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia, that prompted the use of correct words [cf. chronicle WHO, WHO], because in terms of Catholic doctrine, the words is then linked to the substance: words and outward signs are used to express the substance. What this should be familiar to anyone who has studied, not even in depth, the first great dogmatic councils of the Church, in which first of all to define the nature of Christ, God made use of precise terms modulated by greek philosophical lexicon, as the concept of ὑπόστασις [hypostasi, nature if seen].

.

Archbishop of Philadelphia invite you to read his article: "Charity, clarity and their opposite » [item WHO].

.

Someone, to define today - then sdoganare - the various forms of exercise of human sexuality, place God "male and female he created them" [Gen 1, 26-27], perhaps he wants to enter in the ecclesial vocabulary terms as LGBT, if anything, giving birth to a new nature quatripostatica, namely the lesbian nature, gay, bisexual, and transgender?

.

The Synod on the family He left a divided Church and disoriented, as well as several deaths from sudden heart attacks among the rows of the vineyard of the Lord. And after you have tried to clear adultery, It was followed by the Synod of young people in which it appears they are at once by attempting to clear the various practices of sexual expression, without posing the question - how to complain about a saintly Archbishop Charles Chaput - that LGBT Catholics can not exist, least of all the Church can legitimize the existence. O, said with another example, anything but paradoxical: a person can be called Catholic atheist and claim as such, ie as an atheist, its full membership in Catholicism? Yup, It can do it in exactly the same way that, a transsexual proud of their transsexualism, It can call himself a Catholic-transsexual and demand full citizenship rights in the Catholic Church Body and demand the full legitimacy of all its instances. Because, if the laudatori of the Russian Revolution Pontifical not they were aware, in different forms, just that we are going, to a figure entirely new Catholicism and Christian: Catholicism of the Catholic atheists, provided both as church and as a lay, the exercise of an evil prerogative, which it is to harass and persecute believers.

.

We'll see how it turns out even this Synod, but above all we will see if, as in the previous, what will be rejected by the Synod Fathers will end up in the final document, if anything hidden, Also this time, somewhat ambiguous expression or in some marginal notice placed at the bottom of page, the series ... "I crafty, you fools!”. But, the only matter, It is to listen to all, thus giving the impression of being Synod, collegiate and especially Democrats, just as is the Korean dictator Kim Jong, which first convened puppet parliament of North Korea, then does strictly what they like.

.

After this Synod that was opened by the insertion of Acronym dogmatic quatripostatico LBGT, not required by anyone in tool of labor, shortly after it opens another, the Synod Pan Amazon, which it has long been on the agenda of the priesthood clearance granted to married men. But beware, all alone ... to experiment. In the meantime, in the Diocese of Rome, although the fact has not called attention and produced news, They are already underway rehearsal, if we consider that a few days ago was named "pastor" of a metropolitan parish - of course it is: to experiment a permanent deacon, He arrived in the rectory with his wife and four children. And this family, from the official page of the deacons of Rome, which are, however, a real branch of the Neocatechumenal Movement, It was listed as ... "diaconal family" (!?) [cf. service WHO]. Having said that let me know: members of my family, their joint having a presbyter, They may be referred to as "priestly family"? And my mother and my brother, They may be referred to as "mother priestly" and as "brother priestly", obviously extending the title to my "sister in law priestly" and my "priestly grandson"? And do we want to forget my "priestly cat"? Needless to say that the discussion would be very long, However, given that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it in the form pejorative, worth remembering, albeit briefly and quickly, that the permanent diaconate said today, He fell into disuse as the order and became only a passing stage for priestly ordination, after that just in Rome, between the centuries VIII and X, deacons had acquired a prominent role. The deacons were now at the head of the main churches and would not even be ordained priests, why then, these prestigious churches, had access directly to the episcopate. The permanent diaconate will be so restored only after a thousand years, from the Second Vatican Council. And note that not all the dioceses of the world, the bishops ordained permanent deacons, which are absent, for instance, in most African countries, to avoid causing confusion in Catholic populations; and in species where, for anthropological and cultural reasons, the rules related to the chastity of celibacy by priests are not always implemented. In the heart of Europe, in Poland, the first two permanent deacons have been ordained just four decades after Vatican II, In the 2009.

.

In the Eastern Rite Catholic clergy have always been married priests, but they could exercise their ministry only in belonging to their rite diocese; a regulated ritual, against the other, Also from the special Code of Canon Law of the Eastern Churches. Since, however, are being large rehearsal, here is that several of these priests and their families were welcomed in our various Italian dioceses, starting from the Archdiocese of Perugia, Metropolitan Archbishop of which is not a bishop among many, but the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference. I supersede two different facts of a legal nature, and I just ask: in case of any disputes involving a married priest, which law will be applied, the Latin or that of the Eastern Churches? Of course I know it well, that the canon law has long since been replaced by the more savage free will which then turns into the real arrogance that comes to life by the lack of any rule, But the rhetorical question sounds good, and even if the appeal equally useless. Next, as it regards the possible incardinated in the diocese of the Latin Rite, nicely how the priests incardinated married Eastern rite Latinized specifically for rehearsals underway, purpose of which is to please the Head of soviet Pontifical and the circle of his most trusted councilors? there, This could explain it to Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti himself, which it is Archbishop of Perugia and President of the Italian Bishops and home to two priests in his diocese married, to anticipate such decisions of the Synod of the Amazon, that we remember: He has already been taken before its opening [interview, WHO].

.

Having said that a question arises: in the Amazon, they ask themselves to experiment married priests, because the shortage of clergy is very high. Smell, instead, to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon, as a dramatic shortage of clergy there? Because giving a diocesan yearbook look we find that metropolitan parishes 332. The Roman presbytery counts 1.256 presbytery, to which are added 2.929 priests of other dioceses residents in Rome. To these secular priests are then added 5.317 members of the regular clergy, who are the religious priests, and others 87 Priests belonging to various personal prelature [see yearbook, WHO]. In Rome then they reside a total of about 9.580 Priests in the Roman priests, resident priests in the diocese and priests of various religious families. The Diocese of Rome has about 2.350.000 baptized, being divided between the number of diocesan priests living in the canonical territory, damage as a statistic to one priest for every 250 faithful about, all in a Rome with increasingly empty churches. You should then point out that the territory of the Diocese of Rome, It is limited only to the capital of Italy, because out of town, in the City of Rome, arise various dioceses suburbicarian. Request: it was therefore necessary, to exotic experiment, entrust a parish to a permanent deacon in the Mother Church and Mother of all the Churches of Catholic world? Let us act so that while we are celebrating the Synod of youth, They are already underway rehearsal for the Amazon that will give us married priests, It has already been established. I repeat, all alone to experiment and advance notice of Pontifical Parliament North Korea, where dissidents allegedly linked end on missile warheads fired during exercises, but make no mistake, because in Rome's mercy, to the be merciful, also happens a lot worse.

.

to open the video click on the image

If the Cardinal Gerhard Mueller, in a long interview with Raymond Arroyo - that deserves to be heard by all who understand English -, He is back on various topics. The argument from the bad friends who surround the Roman Pontiff, which if it is searched with Diogenes' lantern; S.It is the topic that. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò told nothing but the truth [cf. WHO, WHO], this was because the former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is a true man of God. Add to this that the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, about the human person, It encapsulates the strength of the Teutonic barbarian, in the most noble sense of the term war. Recall that when the barbarians descended from Northern Europe while the Roman Empire was in agony, They found the defending power drunk and made up by women committed to play in the alcoves with youngsters [cf. My previous article, WHO]. O, said in other words: the Romans were taken to live the LBGT lifestyle that had long since absorbed the lifestyle of S.P.Q.R, acronym that once epitomized the concept and foundation of The Roman Senate citizens, and thereafter SPQR. The difference, how many times I have remembered, was that the barbarians, manly affected by hardening of the great Fathers of the Church, in that atmosphere of total decadence were converted en masse to Christianity. In Rome today, on who should be the new barbarians conquered, maybe four crazy fennel entwined like polyps to the throne, which after all they are extremely useful, these being the most devoted ruffians, the most interested servants, informers and spies more efficient, and easily managed and manipulated by the ruler, who knows one by one all the rotting corpses that they keep locked in their graves, even well whited, as it were the graves recalled in the Holy Gospels? [cf. Mt 23, 27-32].

.

I am afraid that no one has then analyzed the historical relationship between the psychology of the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller at the history of his native country, which it is Germany. If we think about it, Today the situation of the visible Church is comparable to the defeat of Germany in 1945, Adolf Hitler penned in bunker Berlin with the narrow courtyard of his loyalists, while before the defeat continued to fight, until enlisting teenagers of sixteen. At the same time he continued to deceive the people that soon would be completed and used the Great Secret Weapon. Just like today they are trying to do before the defeat of journalists mainstream from the true Pontificia, not so much defending the indefensible, which can also be understandable and even justifiable on the human and psychological, but denying, even knowing good and even while knowing all the details, how many lives of good and holy priests have been ruined for not having them folded to complicity with evil. And this makes certain journalists mainstream from the true Pontificia of unscrupulous human real criminals, as well as lack of basic Christian sentiments. We know, however, these, the bridge over now viewers patients overflowing river that await the passage of their bodies dragged from the current, when with an ease that even scandalize whores lower level, Immediately after the next conclave will attempt to recycle and to change color like chameleons, but above all as if nothing had happened. They, however, make a right from this moment: do not have to change skin color, They will just change jobs, because at each their minimum sigh, They will be whipped publicly on the face of all the writings with which they have supported the untenable and defended the indefensible. They do not even hesitate to distort facts and information, with a terrible aggravating circumstance on which any Catholic conscience can never be waived: the whole, they did and carried on to the detriment of the victims and the suffering, towards which showed an indifference that is not simply inhuman, because it is satanic. But what is worse is that they have licked ass of the executioners, showing complete indifference to the affected victims and persecuted within the Church, they knew very well, and also in all the smallest details, both stories is the great suffering. And the Devil never lets you back through the window in disguise, after being kicked out the door; and if by chance he asks for forgiveness pretending to be regretted, We should absolutely believe him, because it is the Supreme Principe lies and deception.

.

After the death of Adolf Hitler, Germany was crossed by a wave of suicide; whole families, If suicidarono. The most common phrase that ran between the good Germans - we remember were many - it sounded something like this: "I am ashamed to be German". Phrase that I have already heard several times in private by bishops and priests: "Faced with this situation is no shame to be part of this Church", with this expression implying that the shame is all linked to ecclesial and ecclesiastical structure of this poor visible Church, certainly not to the mystery of the Church the Mystical Body of Christ.

.

As we know, from the Berlin bunker was then passed at the Nuremberg Trials, where the charred corpse of the man who was the Führer, but especially on the ruins of Germany, They were tried and sentenced the main Nazi leaders, many of whom then sentenced to death, vigendo not at the time the New Church of Mercy that seventy years after the Catechism will remove even the most remote possibility of the death penalty and outstanding. Therefore, tomorrow if something similar happens again, we will be merciful makers symbol of millions dead and millions of people and entrust them to social services [cf. our previous articles WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

In the Church it is about to repeat the Nuremberg trials. Tomorrow, sooner or later, on the disastrous debris of destruction, while bishops and priests will say before the world "I am ashamed to belong to this Church", see paraded before the courts an army of cardinals and bishops who attempt to claim ignorance,: "I just obeyed the orders from above!». With the press of the former true Pontificia that, No longer able to recycle, affirm their part: "We just wrote what we have been ordered to write!». Asked judges: "Your Excellency ... ... Eminence Monsignor ... but she realizes that obeying" superior orders "covered those guilty of serious crimes and has hit the innocent, who they were subjected to all kinds of suffering and oppression under your helpless eyes?». And when the day of their judgment, God will ask, "Why did you not defend the Church and the People of God that I have entrusted to you", they will respond: "But I was bound by pontifical secret!».

.

The death of Christ the Lord It renews and time recurs in different ways, in substance but renewing his sacrifice; not by chance, his Glorious Body, after the resurrection lives bringing still imprinted with the passion signs. Therefore today, Christ the Lord, He died on the cross because bishops and cardinals have "obeyed orders over" and in doing so were more a "bound to the pontifical secret".

.

It's just a matter of little time, let this monster gives the last dangerous and deadly blows tail, because soon we will be in the great hall of Nuremberg, to hear repeated by those directly responsible of the Holocaust of the Catholic Church: "I just obeyed the orders from above!». And we, with all due respect to mercy, because of deep and genuine mercy, We will grant them the atoning grace of the scaffold. Because they are death, us that today we are suffering, harassed and persecuted in our house, Instead we are the salvation and future of the pilgrim Church of Christ on earth. And nobody, We will never prevent you from fulfill our mission for Christ, with Christ and in Christ. Why is the Church of Christ, it is not the private property of Peter, that Christ is the Vicar, not the Successor, least of all the corrector of his word. And the power given to Peter is not total and absolute as some would have you believe, rather: It is a very constrained power. The power of Peter is closely tied to the deposit of the Catholic faith, Tradition and doctrine. Peter is not the absolute master of the Church, on the contrary: It is his first and faithful servant, called to guard the truth and to confirm his brothers in faith [cf. LC 22, 31-34]. The mission of Peter, It is not to convene the "democratic" parliament of North Korea. Peter's mission is not to confuse the people of God, using ambiguous and unclear words, because Christ teaches us: "Let what you speak" yes, Yes; no, No "; the more you from evil» [cf. Mt 5, 37].

.

In short: in the Holy Gospels, everything is very clear and no "clever", in two thousand years of history, It never entered ambiguous small footnotes page. Said this, Finally it should be clarified: it is true, no priest, bishop or cardinal is bound to be a hero. But for a priest, a bishop or a cardinal, is certainly not a great human and Christian honor to be a rabbit before the judgment of history, he replies: "But I have only obeyed orders from above ! ».

.

the Island of Patmos, 7 October 2018

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.