September 2017 – EDIZIONI L'ISOLA DI PATMOS

Author
Recent Posts

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )

On branch Correction: "And Jesus said to the women rinsed clothes near the Sea of Galilee: «”Let go of socks and underpants and follow me! I will make washing machines of men”»

30 September 2017/4 Comments/in Actuality/by father ariel

CORRECTION ON BRANCH: "And JESUS SAID TO WOMEN rinsed CLOTHS NEAR THE LAKE: “ Give up SOCKS AND UNDERWEAR AND FOLLOW! I WILL I WILL WASHING OF MEN“ »

We urge our readers not to follow the misleading theories of these noisy and poisonous Internet, which run on a misconception that many times, of these columns, we have made it clear over the last two years: in The joy of love the reigning Pontiff has repealed and amended by any of its magisterium of the discipline dictated by his Holy and Supreme Predecessor John Paul II in St. Familiar Consortium about the ban, for remarried divorcees, You can receive Holy Communion.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

PDF print format article

by our Lord Jesus Christ to Pope Francis I, through all other Popes in the history of the Church: in the Garden of Olives, to sweat blood, always it is alone …

On the Correzione filiale [cf. text WHO], There are many comments came that we could not publish because many of them raised controversies that are off topic, or because imbued with personal outbursts, or why dripping outbursts mood that generate subjectivism based on the absence of real data. On this fact we have already written and commented in two articles in the 26 e 27 September to which we refer [cf. WHO e WHO].

sorrow very that not a few people cite the post-synodal Exhortation The joy of love appearing not to know either the text or the content, but only a few shreds bed between a blog and the other [CF. full text, WHO], opposing it to another document of the Holy Father John Paul II, the post-synodal Exhortation Family member company. In this game at all honest, certain gamblers show the evidence shows that you have read the Family member company [CF. full text, WHO] what they would like to read, but that it was not written. Indeed, the The joy of love of Pope Francis I, It refers precisely to the supporting structure of the Family member company essentially in the steps that highlight the spirit of charity and reception of these irregular pairs, over which the Holy Father John Paul II expressed himself in very clear tones, it would be enough just to read, but above all read it all:

"The Church's pastoral concern will not be limited only to the Christian families closest, ma, expanding its horizons in harmony with the Heart of Christ, it will show even more lively for families in general, and those, in particular, which are in difficult or irregular situations. For all the Church will have a word of truth, di bontà, of understanding, of hope, and deep sympathy with their sometimes tragic difficulties; all she will offer her disinterested help so that they can approach the family model, that the Creator intended from "the beginning" and which Christ has renewed with His redeeming grace " [Family member company, n. 65].

The Holy Father John Paul II clarifies the position of irregularities of divorced and remarried, and at the same time show them mercy, welcome and help, because this reads the now award-mentioned n. 84 from the Family member company :

«[…] I earnestly call upon pastors and the whole community of the faithful to help the divorced and with solicitous care that do not consider themselves separated from the Church, they can, and indeed must, as baptized, share in his life. They should be encouraged to listen to the Word of God, to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass, to persevere in prayer, to contribute to works of charity and to community efforts for justice, to educate children in the faith Christian, to cultivate the spirit and practice of penance and thus implore, di giorno in giorno, God's grace. The Church pray for them, encourage them, It proves merciful mother, and thus sustain them in faith and hope […]

but yet, this n. 84, by some, it is elevated above the same Trinitarian dogma, It is taken, cut and then only commented only final step. A step - and it is worth repeating -, It acts as a closed after various periods imprinted on deeper fondness pastoral and Christian mercy:

«[…] The church, however, It reiterates its practices, based on Sacred Scripture, di non ammettere alla comunione eucaristica i divorziati risposati» [cf. n. 84].

As this is not the appropriate site, overflight of purely disquisitions technical doctrinal and I limit myself to only clarify in passing that "practice" is not synonymous with the dogma, if it is not made express reference to dogmatic practices, because the "practice" are not always linked to the tenets of faith. For when a "practice" or canonical or church discipline is supported on one or more dogmas of faith, i test it more clearly indicate. If in fact the Blessed Paul VI had been able to support the Encyclical Human life with a "dogmatic pronouncement", would do the, instead he supported and structured on criteria relating to natural law, because to hold a solemn pronouncement of the prohibition of contraception - which I repeat is a norm and moral discipline expressed with a high degree of certainty -, the supports were not. Otherwise, Blessed Paul VI, he resorted to a solemn pronouncement of the infallible magisterium. Ma, like it or not certain, He did not do it; and he did not because he could not do [please refer to Article John Cavalcoli, WHO].

I then note that the spirit of loving kindness and mercy that pervades Family member company, It does not reflect the subjective personality of the Holy Father John Paul II and the Fathers of the bishops who took part in the Synod of 1981, but pervades the Divine Person of him that the Church is the Founder and Head of his Mystical Body, which states:

"" Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners? He heard this and said,: “Non sono i sani che hanno bisogno del medico, but the sick. Go and learn what this means: I desire mercy, not sacrifice. For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners' " [Mt 9, 11-13].

Having said that you know well how different it is this spirit and this magisterium, than the "magisterium" of those Internet users who no light of Christian charity use in the form of derogatory terms such as "concubines", "Adultery" and "public sinners". Of course, There have always been "concubines", "Adultery" and "public sinners", Perhaps now more than ever, but we leave that to treat certain sensitive topics of Catholic morality that affect the lives of entire families, is the Church Mater et Magistra, with the grace of state charity that is proper, and avoid, some angry women have chosen the sensitive terrain to give vent to their inner frustrations and hardships under their banner unspecified True Catholicism, to teach the Church as it should be Mater et Magistra. How to be taught it to him, and commanded Our Lord Jesus Christ, and he must follow popes, bishops and priests, which must not take orders from certain secular, but especially those secular passionarie inviperite by their lack of humanity and Christian charity, ignoring the warning of Christ God who reminds us that the law was made for man, not man for the law [cf. MC 2, 27]. Unfortunately, idolatry of the law we always subtract the Diocentrism to make us sink in 'homocentrism :

"Hypocrites!! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying: “ This people honors me with their lips but their hearts are far from me. In vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men '" [Mt 15, 7-9].

Unfortunately there are many readers who have written texts were citing as the infallible teaching of the stupidities written in forms sometimes delirious on various sites and blogs of improperly called real Catholic tradition; those from which several times, during these years, we Fathers de The Island of Patmos We warned Catholics acting so for imperative priestly awareness, not least considering that Christ God, his flock to graze, He entrusted it to his priests, not to certain angry lay of unspecified catholicity that rage for the network and that defy correction and any contradictory, if necessary, showing a total lack of respect when priests with pastoral experience and adequate theological formation, doctrinal and legal, They call them and ask them to correct the error. The whole, needless to say, comes to life in the drama generated the confusion of roles which now raging within the Church, where even the last of the catechists do not hesitate to do hair and against the grain in public - and note well - even the parish priest, but directly to the bishop. And if someone points out that it is out of his mind, because the guardian of the deposit of faith is to grace the bishop of Sacramento and certainly not her, She will reiterate without any problem, more convinced than ever: "Ah, but I make the catechist for thirty years and I have enough experience to say that the bishop is wrong, because it is my duty to defend the faith, as St. Catherine of Siena!». And here it must be said between the lines, before proceeding further in the speech, and Santa Caterina no man passed through my mind to give the public bischero the Bishop of Siena, even if some of them were so great in the past and in recent times. At the catechist Passionaria can then add the stuffed Capitoline sacred fire, that building on its diplomino taken at the notorious factory genes of the theology of the Theresianum, worse by saying: "But I am a theologian!». And this to be so right to criticize everyone and everything from his blog, from the Pope to the last bishop of 'Orbe catholica, not to mention bestowed slapped the conciliarists priests to which she has been teaching for years how they should celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Needless to say, this as another pious woman between books and articles rant for years indicating the heretic and schismatic bishop Marcel Lefebvre like a new Saint Athanasius of Alexandria, what would happen to all this noisy and intrusive harem should she do azzardassero fleas priests Lefebvre, or to say, even at the last of the twenty-five newly ordained priests at their beloved Society of St. Pius X, how should celebrate Mass. Why not try to do it? E, after doing so, It narrates how many meters were made of bounce like rubber balls thrown at great force on the wall ...

… in conclusion, just as if Jesus Christ he took a small group of the Lord committed to wash clothes to wash near the Sea of Galilee, and he told them: "Women, give up socks and underpants and follow me, because I will make washing machines of men!».

I therefore note that all harmful theories served up by these subjects blinded by real aggressive hatred towards the reigning Pontiff, They can be removed with a simple observation: these surfers who telematics network have set up their fantastic chairs of canon law, dogmatic and the Catholic moral theology, presenting themselves as defenders of the true and pure Traditio, on the one hand they deny the authority of an entire ecumenical council of the Church, up to indicate Vatican II in mocking tones as "huddle", but at the same time claim to confer dogma rank, like the great Christological dogma, to n. 84 from the Familiar Consortium of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II. And here one might say: excuse me, Ladies and Gentlemen, the evident spirit border-line, but the pontiff whose elevated to "dogmatic banner" No.. 84 from the Familiar Consortium, Is not the same that you, shortly before, in pages and pages insulting soaked acrimony, you accused of heresy for the "evil" ecumenical meeting in Assisi promoted by the Sant'Egidio Community? Let me be clear, not to me never liked that meeting and I have not failed in several of my writings imbued with the holy vitriol to define even the "Grand Carnival of Rio de Janeiro away in Assisi». But I is not never crossed my mind to censor ergermi of the Holy Father John Paul II or worse to accuse him of "apostasy from the Catholic faith", as it wrote, affirmed and repeatedly stated, however, those who consider it as superior to the dogma of faith Nicene Creed the only two last lines of the n. 84 from the Familiar Consortium, written by that same Holy Father John Paul II from them repeatedly accused of heresy, and referred to as "the apostate ecumenist". And dogmatise in the last two lines of this issue, completely ignore and juggling with the winds that precede it, that I am a reminder, indeed a true hymn of praise to charity, to the mercy and reception of these irregular pairs, many of whom live with uncomfortable their situation in relation to their intimate feelings Christians.

I beg you, Dear Readers and devout Catholic Faithful "Be sober and vigilant, your opponent, the devil, It walks about like a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour. Resist him, standing firm in the faith " [The Pt 5, 8-9]. And if my priestly grace can be of help, weigh up, ve ne prego, my words fact-based objective data, on written texts and long years of smear campaigns carried out against the last five Popes Church history, at the hands of those who now present themselves as defenders of the true faith before a Church defined by the "heretical and apostate". Claim based on a theological ignorance and disconcerting doctrinal, because the Church is the Body of Christ, di cui lui è capo e noi membra vive. Can he, then, Christ gave, be "a heretic and apostate"? That the visible church - that is, the ecclesiastical structure - both invaded and permeated with sin and moral corruption, It is so evident as indubitable, but the Church, the mystical body of Christ is holy and without blemish, For us believers. Unfortunately, however, it is not so for the strings of these spiritual disadvantaged, who continue to treat it as a political phenomenon, to give vent to its internal political clashes based on pretexts doctrinaire.

Ah, if my Priests Brothers only to come back to teach and convey the fundamentals of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, in our increasingly visible Church reduced to a cross between a philanthropic association, a political association left radical e chic, not last, a criminal!

We therefore call on our readers not to follow the misleading theories of these noisy and poisonous Internet, which run on a misconception that many times, on these lines, we have made it clear over the last two years: in The joy of love the reigning Pontiff has repealed and amended by any of its magisterium of the discipline dictated by his Holy and Supreme predecessor John Paul II in Familiar Consortium about the ban, for remarried divorcees, You can receive Holy Communion.

Consider then how absurd and impious thing the claim to dogmatize on one side of the ecclesiastical disciplines that are not dogmas of faith or bound by solemn pronouncements capable of papal infallibility [cf. Ad defend the faith], but at the same time denying so stubborn and aggressive the authorities of the two dogmatic constitutions of Vatican II, that is to say of certain aggressive Internet would only be pastoral assizes, then it would be a so-called little council Third grade without any valid. In short, four "chat with friends" made by bishops from around the world with the Roman Pontiff in the sixties of the twentieth century, not having one and the other better to do to employ their time. And once I stated this and rejected an entire council of the Church, as they say undogmatic, that's the usual suspects then proceed to elevate to the rank of dogma of the Holy Catholic Faith - and much higher degree in the same dogma of the Incarnation of the Word of God made man -, the Motu proprio Popes Venerable Pope Benedict XVI on before the liturgical reform of the liturgy 1970. Now, it is really unnecessary to add that if the results of this Motu Proprio were in fact also give in the hands of not a few people of St. Pius V Missal used today as a machete sharpened to attack the Church and the papacy and to create divisions, perhaps it would be well that the reigning Pontiff, the judge should be lifted as soon as possible for reasons of pastoral prudence, avoiding that the Eucharist, center of life and unity of the universal Church, ends up being used in a diabolical way to create friction and division among the people of God, by non few spiritual disadvantaged and groups of politicians moved by aggressive and destructive ideology.

All of this, be clear, has just been expressed by a priest like myself would feel very comfortable if a new liturgical reform leads again the celebrant faces the altar before God, with Latin missal of Blessed Pope Paul VI, except for the Liturgy of the Word proclaimed in the vernacular, with the appropriate chants and rigorously approved by the Ecclesiastical, with the classic organ sound, no more little guitars strimpellate, rhythmic bongos and, least of all, dances and clapping, but above all with respect for the sacred liturgical silence and so to follow …

The Correzione filiale, always to use the terminology of the purely theological lexicon, And “stolta” ed “oscillate”. But above all it is an authentic process to intentions not based on the findings of the written text of The joy of love, but on what the editors assume that the written text could mean and possibly affirm, thus attributing to the Roman Pontiff things he, de facto, He never claimed, nor granted. Then, that on certain issues related to the dogmatic foundations of Catholic faith and morals, Viga now utter confusion, this is an indisputable fact; but it is a fact much earlier than the pontificate of Pope Francis I, and it is also a fact a lot prior to the publication of The joy of love, which undoubtedly also it contains gaps or not happy expressions and clear, but they are not the first, nor new in the history of the texts of the Church. I, who for various reasons have got to follow for years is the process of beatification, is to actively participate with my publications to the denial of the false accusations against the Venerable Pope Pius XII by different authors, I have repeatedly explained and documented that the crisis of the Church, along with the theological drift, They had already taken all final form at the end of his pontificate to the mid-fifties of the twentieth century. Several times I also tried to explain and demonstrate that the famous encyclical of Pope Pius XI, To the Catholic priesthood [cf. text WHO], It is written in the mid-thirties, already it contains all critical to the germ of this crisis, besides the fact that between the lines of this encyclical emerge many instances imprinted by Antonio Rosmini the century before in his text On the Five Wounds of the Church, which also helped to benefit him mass index, only to be later proclaimed blessed.

Unfortunately, the drafters of the Correzione filiale, Also included among them a epistemologo, unaware that repetitive periods, gaps for lack of more in-depth explanations and certain expressions that could be made better, Also emerging from the text of the Council of Trent, after that of Nicea it is considered by many scholars, one of the most articulated and complete the councils of the Church's history, in all its aspects dogmatic, disciplinari e pastorali; and I personally consider this.

On canonical plan, the correction Branch is a non-existent written that does not respect the structure and the wording of its request, and it is devoid of the clarity and concreteness that required that the signatories accuse be deficient in the text of The joy of love of Pope Francis I.

on the theological level, lacks the entire detailed and thorough explanation according to which can also be supported one and the mere hypothesis of heresy direct or indirect, first indicating the dogma against which go to certain expressions configgere, and in which way, these expressions, possibly heretical, They were formulated.

Although the document The joy of love it contained within itself the passages ambiguous or unclear - and undoubtedly contains them -, it does not, however, contain any concession or pantry given by Pope in derogation to the n. 84 from the Family member company. And who says that "the pastoral practice you want to destroy the doctrine ', in fact falls, objectively, in the process of intentions. Also because, if some really attempted to undermine the doctrine through the pastoral practice, what ultimately counts, There is not that they audition, but they they succeed, place in such an undertaking can never benefit from the explicit or tacit consent of this as no other Pope. Therefore, We can not ask the Supreme Pontiff, after doing the process to his intentions, to withdraw the granting of what he has never granted, namely the possibility, ever given to remarried divorcees who live in situations of adultery, or in so-called irregular situations, you can access the Holy Eucharist.

Although in one he complained Correzione filiale It was the ambiguity of some of the passages The joy of love, the editors have mixed in their text fragments of speeches made "colloquially" the Roman Pontiff in his capacity as a private doctor, adding also, on the written final, critical aspects of modernism and Protestantism. All this gives rise to a confused text, or as we say in another expressive jargon "to a minestrone", devoid of legal and theological criteria, formulated in a very wrong way.

Besides canonical and theological inconsistency, the Correzione filiale it is above all a serious lack of respect and Christian charity toward Augusta Person of our Lord Jesus Christ Holiness the Pope Francis I, mainly formulated also by a group of theologians that, da tempo, They have lost sight of the fact that they are at the service of the Magisterium of the Church, They are not on top of it, much less his censors. The theologian who rejects the acts of the Magisterium ceases to be Catholic, assuming as a result - whether it be conservative or progressive -, the very worst attitudes of those recruited by the Reverend Professor. Hans Küng, it is only "limited" to criticize certain acts of the Magisterium, but he has never defined or marked as heterodox. And who among all seems not to understand this, the proof of facts, unfortunately, appears to have been dear Antonio Livi, I do not know with whom, If by the grace or misfortune, die submerged in the microcosm of egocentricity the great Roman Theological School. So congratulations to dear Antonio Livi, which it would be enough just a hint of narcissism less and a livicentrismo more moderate; it would be enough that he had learned to listen to others, instead of only himself, to avoid to win big in the School of Bologna. Just so: the Bologna School won, while Antonio Livi, last member of the glorious Roman School, He had committed to him talk with the aesthetic Enrico Maria Radaelli, while all pissed Lepanto Foundation, leaning against the corner of their chivalry halberd, The clapping and saying,: "You are great!». In the meantime, the house engulfed in flames burned, while they were trying to bite the hands to those who, uselessly, as the Father Giovanni Cavalcoli, me and many others, They have tried in every way to encourage them to save themselves, and save yourself by with a great wealth of theological education. Because l 'egolatria of certain people has gone down to the apex of the worst destruction: not even let a student, because to have the worthy students, first of all we have to have the ability and humility to confront them, if need be to learn from their acumen and their ingenuity. But if these egolatri, During the years, He approached some talented potential students, They have nothing better to do than destroy it, terrified that these, in a near or distant future, could prevent them to shine on his own. Therefore, Antonio Love, when it goes around in circles to pontificate of the halberdiers and countesses aspiring all lace and Latin magic, stating that "At the Lateran have destroyed my school ', Well aware that lied without knowing of lying, because the Roman School has destroyed him with his selfishness and his failure to listen and comparison, they have not destroyed nor the modernists nor rahneriani, that neither Antonio Livi or other distinguished theologians and scholars have never given consideration, because for half a century they have won and certainly did not need to defend themselves from the attacks of three mosquitoes.

And so, another heritage, It got lost. Always and penalty for the damn destructive glory "I" of those who, when they remain alone and not with those who argue, at that point they start to quarrel with themselves and to self-destruct.

May he rest in peace then the Roman School e, as late as possible, her last pupil of great and talented, Antonio Love.

They did not even have to attack and make war, we destroyed yourself, even he drowned in glory but in the ridiculous, because the last thing that often remains in the memory is the cadaverous face of the old dead rigged the beautician of the funeral home, not the image of what was the heyday of his youth, but the painful face of the Painted Dear Extinct, while halberdiers and countesses mourn a poignant lament in Latin magic the Aventine Hill at the Lepanto Foundation, shouting "heresy, heresy, we schism!».

It's miserable triumph of the three pissed mosquitoes who finally tried to sting the old and ancient elephant sitting for two thousand years the Chair of Peter, however, correcting it in such a way branch, very filial …

from The Island of Patmos, 30 September 2017

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

Author
Recent Posts

Drafting

The editors of The Island of Patmos
Editorial Articles

( Click on the name to read all the articles )

the heretical Pope, Antonio Livi and the patch that ends up being worse than the tear, the intellectual pride drama

27 September 2017/7 Comments/in Actuality/by Drafting

POPE Heretic, ANTONIO LIVI AND THE PATCH THAT ENDS WITH BE THE WORST RIP, THE TRAGEDY OF INTELLECTUAL PRIDE

"By means of words, acts and omissions and through passages of the document The joy of love, Your Holiness has sustained, directly or indirectly (how and how much knowledge we do not know or want to judge him), The following false and heretical propositions, propagated in the Church so much with the public office as a private act " [from the correction filial]

Authors
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Jorge Facio Lynx

PDF print format article
.

"I seriously pigliateli, take them for the ass "

[apocryphal Letter Saint Irenaeus of Lyons]

good morning!

to open the text of Rev. Prof. Antonio Love, click on the image from The New Compass Daily the 27.07.2017

Today, his The New Compass Daily, It appeared an article by Mons. Antonio Love, a signatory subsidiary plea in which it makes a charge of seven heresies, apparently, It would not be such. E, who thinks it, wrong, because he misunderstood the text [cf. correction filial – Italian text].

With this article Mons. Antonio Livi comes into full communion with the Pope Francis I, sharing with His Holiness an element that characterizes this pontificate: "The Holy Father was misheard", "It has been misinterpreted ', "With that he wanted to say anything, but it has been misrepresented because of journalists who have reported bad his words ".

A script with which Mons. Antonio Love It fits fully in what is called and said improperly bergogliano spirit, to use this unfortunate journalistic term that has nothing to do with the Church and ecclesiastical language, least of all with the theological.

In the Latin text of the subsidiary plea, a lot of, including the Holy See and the organs of the Italian Episcopal Conference, They think that they have recognized the formulation of seven heresies, But surely falling into error before this Latin text:

With these words, the acts, and omissionibus, The joy of love, which we have, and we have said in those statements in the book of, The holiness of the right for you, your he held up the case;, and in the church (we dare not to judge the intelligence we do not know what kind of and how great the) has the following propositions:, together with the office of the public as well as the act of a private individual, growth:, wrong course and misbelievers.

A text translated by the Supplicants in this way in Italian:

By means of words, acts and omissions and through passages of the document The joy of love, Your Holiness has sustained, directly or indirectly (how and how much knowledge we do not know or want to judge him), The following false and heretical propositions, propagated in the Church so much with the public office as a private act.

In other languages when this text was written, the Italian verb "support" has been translated: upheld, sustained, supported …

Despite the self-evident and obvious clarity of these words, today, several extensor, They are claiming that he had never accused of heresy, the Supreme Pontiff, even after signing a text that reads: "Your Holiness has sustained, directly or indirectly […] The following false and heretical propositions'. In short, Article in front of contradiction and clarification of Mons. Antonio Livi really come back to mind the words of that “Holy Doctor of the Church ” of Hegel, in a phrase attributed to him says: "If the facts do not fit the theory, so much the worse for the facts ".

In the Holy Gospel we read these words: "No one puts a piece of new cloth on an old garment, because the patch pulls away from the cloak and the tear gets worse " [cf. Mt, 16]. Exactly what does that of Antonio Livi The New Compass every day Today tore his clothes under the title "Correction to the Pope, the truth that readers deserve ". there, If there is one thing that the readers just do not deserve, everyone, and especially our faithful, It is to be treated as perfect idiots. Because when you start to play on words, It goes beyond the ambit of the theology, that demands and inherently clear and precise terms that mean and can mean only one thing, not a multiplicity of things. Otherwise it comes precisely from the scope theological to enter the sophistry and in those legal Byzantinisms that acted as a prelude to the Roman Empire, this thing that, as church historian, should know first of all Roberto de Mattei [cf. WHO]. Equally sweet Cristina Siccardi, which now tries to hide behind the "maternal protection of Mary» [WHO], it is good to remember to be Mother of the Church and Mother of Priests, Mother of the politicians do not clumsy, low alloy such, that behind doctrinal and theological pretexts conceal completely different purposes, discontent, frustrations, noble caste ceased to exist, and not least economic interests, as do the ultra-traditionalists, on one side it is for some very expensive, while for others it is very profitable.

Therefore, Who word hurts word perishes: Indeed, the charge - it goes without saying legitimate - that is made in several steps of the post-synodal exhortation text The joy of love, It is just to be clear, to be ambiguous traits, foretaste of the most diverse and disparate interpretations, as it is written in a language and terms not always clear.

Antonio Livi fell in the same game through the text signed by him, which according to him the words would be misinterpreted, or the meaning of the words themselves. All this said by a philosopher and theologian who should know very well that the term hypostasi, It has a precise meaning and not a variety of meanings, because internally it not only contains the precise explanation, but also the interpretation already given through the enunciation of a dogma, as well as the term transubstantiation and so. And these terms, in substance and in their meaning, remain intact even if transposed or translated into other languages.

Unless you live in a world in which all they misunderstand everything, then, Mons. Antonio Livi should also explain this statement, why to the question, repeated for the second time … "We repeat: There are heresies in Bergoglio?». He answers:

"He is not personally and formally into heresy, He does not have said so blatant. He does not proclaim things that are heretical, however, she makes her say to others without correct or disprove, therefore avallandole. I think it's at least a sin against prudence and pastoral practice has a damaging. We try to do is to repent in the practice both in the doctrine which is suffering from the Modernism. This initiative is a must " [cf. WHO].

Mons. Antonio Livi Has not realized he had said, with his answer, that the Supreme Pontiff, according to him, is done to such an extent fearful and devoid of manly attributes, who even dare to enunciate heresies, It makes proclaim to others, Then he endorse tacitly? Or maybe we understood and misunderstood this too his masterful response?

The Holy Father Francis has many flaws, more than once we have them brought to light and we have discussed on The Island of Patmos [cf. WHO], but if there is one thing of which he is not without, It is just the manly attributes.

Sorry to bring certain facts, but Mons. Antonio Livi is not new to shoot certain dangerous burst and misleading precisely on the doctrinal. We limit ourselves to only a few examples: after having publicly described as "infamous" the speech of the Holy Father John XXIII opened the Second Vatican Council, he goes on the uproar by saying, "I can hardly call it St. John XXIII, because a canonization that occurs outside the canonical laws poses problems ". Faced with these words, it is very painful for us to remember all'improvvido rapporteur who aspires to be one of the last defenders of the pure dogma remained in the devastated Catholic world, this canonization should not make it right no problem, because every canonization involves a pronouncement which implies that sealed infallibility as a dogma of faith by Blessed Pius IX. Therefore hurts to remember, this defender of a dogma that is likely to be a dogmatic subjectively elastic, the Prof. Andrea Grillo, we often severely criticized in theological disputes about these columns and referred to as an exponent of modernism, made “dangerous” from his deep preparation and his remarkable intelligence, It has never allowed - so far as we know - to put into question the beatification of Pius IX nor the canonization of Pius X. Moreover, intellectual honesty and theological, today requires us to remain very well impressed by the manner and content through which, he Prof. Andrea Grillo, He commented on the overrun problem [cf. WHO]. E, said this, draw Mons. Antonio Livi its own conclusions, if it considers that more and in this his long speech he goes on to say:

«[…] as I've written many times about the Post-Synodal Apostolic The joy of love, the Pope wanted to be deliberately ambiguous. Because? Because on one hand it would mean essentially heretical things, and the other knows that can not say '.

Reading this unfortunate phrase in the light of logic, law and theology itself, this petty talk and express themselves is called “process to intentions”. And for over an hour, before a large audience, Mons. Antonio Love, recorded and filmed, Finally transcribed and published, He has established these and other worse things. No then proceed over, we refer readers to read this his keynote held last year [the keynote it is readable WHO], waiting for the director of The New Compass Daily soon publish another of his denial article more or less marked on the principle that "If the facts do not fit the theory, so much the worse for the facts ". E, it goes without saying, with the addition, by Archbishop. Antonio Livi that, those who think like me, It is a historicist, a rahneriano and a dangerous modernist heretic. Unaware that, to be Orthodox theologians, not enough to be opposed to the theological speculations of Karl Rahner, only to act, in some hard facts, in so much worse than it has done this dangerous German Jesuit theologian. Therefore, dear Bishop. Antonio Love, Also in this have the humility to learn from an authentic man of God as Father Giovanni Cavalcoli, who studied for thirty years and then criticized in any way dangerous thought of Karl Rahner, He has never failed to always bring to light, also and especially, the many interesting aspects in it. So how many times, Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, sworn enemy of modernism, He has not failed to highlight both the objective problem of the "reactive modernism to an excessive rigor ', is the fact that the poor Don Ernesto Buonaiuti, after his deserved condemnation, It was treated by the Ecclesiastical Authority with a lack of truly inhuman charity; because the Mother Church can not be treated inhumanely even a dangerous heretic, severely if, but not inhumanely.

It's this one, incidentally, is called: intellectual honesty, in the absence of which falls in the blind ideology, and instead of doing theology, you risk doing only subjective egology.

(D)inanza the painful story of Mons. Antonio Livi comes to mind Socrates, that shortly before drinking the hemlock he said: "Better to die with the body healthy to avoid canceling".

In any case, we are certain that Bishop. Antonio Love, man of faith and of great priestly piety, He would have no difficulty, to health or punishment of eternal damnation of his soul, to solemnly declare that, from 2014 till today, He never claimed that the Pope Francis I is heretical. He never said anything like that to any person, No group of people, in any circle and chose to rally people. May, in any of its private message, directed to one or more persons, He responded to questions placed to him to be faithful lost and disoriented, declaring that the Pope Francis is a heretic, and he never told anyone, with all the details of the case, what his heresies.

A similar statement, it would not trouble even the retired bishop and behind the scenes of this text uploaded several lay in good faith, using his episcopal authority to lead them into serious mistake. This prelate, which he has never exceeded and digested the anger of not having been made a cardinal, for its part, always worth the health or eternal damnation of his soul, could also add the reassurance that in any where, to any person and any group of people, he never claimed, as of the end of 2013, that the Pope Francis I, in addition to being a heretic, It would even be linked to the International Masonry (!?).

Faced with this heartbreaking desolation, it is our desire to postpone Readers to an article written in 2015 by Father Giovanni Cavalcoli and dedicated to apologia of pride. It's a very enlightening article, in which the Dominican theologian indicate and explain to what extent, the intellectual one, It has always been the worst form of arrogance. That which among other things prevents the haughty to apologize, after blatantly wrong, transforming the fact that "I confess to almighty God and to you my brothers that I have sinned in thought, words, works and omissions', only in a rhythmic chant, especially impressive if he recited in Latin [Article by Giovanni Cavalcoli is readable WHO].

Good lunch!

The Island of Patmos, 27 September 2017

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

Author
Recent Posts

father ariel

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )

A heretic Supreme Pontiff? The blind foolishness of “Party bergogliani”: to defend the Holy Father Francis, and with him the Petrine ministry, it is necessary to highlight also its many flaws, instead sing “osanna, hosannas in the heights of heaven!” and treat it as if it was the most perfect of Christ

26 September 2017/4 Comments/in Actuality/by father ariel

A POPE Heretic? THE BLIND OF foolishness'PARTY OF BERGOGLIANI »: TO PROTECT THE POPE FRANCIS AND WITH HIM THE MINISTRY PETRINE, YOU MUST PUT IN LIGHT ALSO MANY DEFECTS, INSTEAD sing "OSANNA, OSANNA IN THE OF HEAVEN !"TREAT AND HOW WAS THE MOST PERFECT CHRIST

The heretic, schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay, with your signature on this document that accuses the reigning Pontiff seven heresies, has given a sound and deserved slap imprudent Francis I, who thought that, among the pastries offered tenderness and flavored cakes mercy, could sweeten concentrates bile as heretical followers located upstream: Marcel Lefebvre, giving example to his followers authority to administer the sacraments in a lawful. And these were then the resulting short rained results on the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, it tends not to listen to anyone. E, when listening to, It tends to listen to the wrong people …

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

PDF print format article

Carlo Caffara: "If a bishop has a thought contrary to what the Pope has to go, but just you have to go by the diocese. Because lead the faithful on a road that is not what Jesus Christ. So lose himself forever and would risk eternal loss of the faithful " – to listen to the video interview click on the image

It was made public a document, sent to Pope Francis on August 11, then made public 24 September by a large group of scholars, mostly secular, who gently titled the letter "branch correction" and in which the Successor of Peter is accused of heresy [cf. documentO WHO]. Since the text was 'Branch', the writers were limited to attribute only seven heresies, Thank goodness! Imagine what would happen, if instead of 'Branch' was instead an angry text.

The real guiltiness of the signatories It is first of all the distressing stupidity, as proof their twenty pages of text containing jumbles, themes and issues in the off topic to no end, far more numerous than they find instead in the far more numerous pages that make up the text of the Apostolic Exhortation post-synodal The joy of love, which is not exactly clear and happy, but that is not, however, a tacciabile text of heresy.

The problem of the seven heresies the short-examine, because first you need a preamble in which the defense is a must for some people, but at the same time also the unavoidable jack ass di altre [cf. WHO]. That said you tranquilize Studio, because St. Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer said many more swear words than I, that the Holy founder of comparison 'The Work of God I have a language whiteness comparable to that of the Beata Imelda. Then please note that my language, before that of St. Pio of Pietrelcina, It is comparable to that of St. Agnes, virgin and martyr whispering sweet words to the ear of tender lamb holding arm. In this manner it is enough to recall that the confessor saint of Pietrelcina did flee from the confessional screaming at one thirty in the dialect of Gargano: "Get out great whore!». Years after, the "great whore", He entered the cloistered convent of Poor Clare nuns, dying nonagenarian more than half a century later, a reputation for holiness, after the brutal expulsion from the confessional of the Holy Cappuccino. And this nun I knew her, I preached several times in his monastery. And always the same confessor, ad un altro giovane, who later became one of his devotees spiritual children, he said: "You are not just a sinner, you're just a fucking man!». Now, since I am also postulator of the Causes of Saints, taking a cue from certain revered figures, account one day to reach the holiness to which all the baptized are called, Also, if necessary using a language teaching to pastoral carter God.

The name used by most journalists to give prominence to the news, including one of the most famous Vaticanists, even more than the fact and the text itself, was that of Professor Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, until the 2012 President of the I.O.R. la cosiddetta banca vaticana [cf. WHO]. Expenses, like myself, and Father Giovanni Cavalcoli, he got to know this devout Catholic, and man of faith and virtue mirrored life, first he understands the purity of his intentions. Gotti Tedeschi has in fact acted following an instinct imprinted on his love for the Church and the Papacy, but also toward the same reigning Pope. Like him, I presume acted the majority of other signatories lay, that almost all I do not know, with the exception of Professor Roberto de Mattei, which it is a scholar who tends to apply to the Church socio-political schemes and criteria concealed behind the defense of the purity of faith. How indeed do Lefebvre, who are not devotees of the Saint Pius X heirs, to which it is titrated their Priestly Society, but devotees unwitting heirs of Martin Luther's style: overthrow the pontiff on the false pretext of defending the papacy that does not defend them say the purity of the faith.

Among the soaked signatories of this socio-political style pro-Lutheran He could not miss the Katharina von Bora situation, delicious Cristina Siccardi, task of which should be to wash and iron the altar cloths of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, starching corporal with the gelatin and mending amitti reciting the Sacred Heart of Jesus, not to make the historic Church so to say the least clumsy and especially blinded by ideology. And we remember that being said incidentally that von Bora was a former Cistercian nun later became his wife heresiarch Luther.

My esteem for a man of faith as Gotti Tedeschi It has not diminished, assessed the purity of his intentions. This deserves reflection on which is not always, purity of intention, leads to good choices, at least ever since the original sin exists, for us believers and Orthodox theologians is a fact, not an allegorical metaphor. E, like all people exposed to sin, It is worth mentioning that it is one thing to err in good faith in the certainty of doing the right and just, else err is moved by a bad faith made such by multiple seconds purposes that certain spurious utterances often hide. Or good, if the first of the two cases set out above, It is to Gotti Tedeschi, whose "fault" is diminished almost to non-existence of the guilt itself, the second - far from wanting to judge his conscience -, It is instead the case of Roberto de Mattei, of those who follow him and who overseas bankrolls its activities into fights a lot of money. Because a foundation such as Lepanto, with its many national and international activities, including publishing activities to lose, made of printed books and distributed the proceeds fail to even cover living expenses Printing, It can not be sustained by selling subscriptions to the monthly Christian roots ; and who asserted this or other similar, would seriously hurt people's intelligence.

While a coretto VATICAN gods adulanti the first and last hours have been satisfied to take mostly mockery of these signatories, I am doing my part that job that I compete, that is to dogmatic theologian and a person who has acquired a bit 'of legal education, I will point to one and the other of these vaticanologists, those of the first ones and the last hour, who are those who are truly among the signatories mocked: i ministers of the sacred who affixed their signatures on a text that is legally and theologically wicked and delirious.

We all remember with what grace and humility, following an ancient apostolic tradition, four Cardinals presented the dubia to the Pope asking for a reply [cf. WHO]; all in the legitimate exercise of their sacred episcopal ministry, moving within a Church open to such "point" and "collegial" to have ceased to expatiate on matters of doctrine and faith after the death of the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II, and after the act of renunciation of the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI. What about the disputes to which he was subjected as Blessed Pope Paul VI, in defense of which they never arose all atheists anticlerical that at present they are elected papafranceschisti, or that without it ridiculous remember today, us theologians sometimes legitimately puzzled by certain pastoral positions of Pope Francis I and some of his expressions harbingers of each worst ambiguities, that every breath is infallible and that our job is just to keep quiet and obey after turning off the brain and the Catholic conscience, taking rather as acts of solemn infallible teaching proclamations published unofficial organ of the Holy See, the newspaper The Republic. E, while they are forced to live and often suffer these absurd paradoxes, here Eugenio Scalfari, Alberto Melloni, Enzo Bianchi, Andrea Grillo and so to follow, continue undisturbed, but most never denied by the Holy See, in spreading an absurd-grotesque image of a "Pope Francis" which is only their own parody of both the Petrine ministry, both of the papacy, is of the same reigning Pope.

Acceptable would also be a possible "fraternal correction" by a group of bishops, made with all the trappings of humility and recognition of the amount of the Apostles authority of the Prince, Obviously in private, as part of the most intimate and secret talks. E, said this, it is worth remembering - in these times of abysmal ignorance practiced by many who write of "the Church" chores on the magazines or blogs -, that bishops, They are not employees of the subordinates of the Roman Pontiff, but his brothers tied sacramental dignity, called as members of the Apostolic College from the pastoral care of the Church. Indeed, both the Supreme Pastor of the Church, both the Pastors of the particular Churches which make up the body of the universal Church, They are covered with the same degree sacramental dignity: the fullness of the apostolic priesthood [cf. C.I.C. can. 334]. The Roman Pontiff is not greater sacramental able to even the last bishop of the most remote missionary diocese of this world, it is only higher in the primacy of jurisdiction over the whole universal Church [cf. C.I.C. cann. 331-332], because it is up to him to preside over the College of the Apostles, and if necessary choose the Apostles themselves.

The bishops then, first of all, canonical title to relate as equals in the sacramental dignity of the Roman Pontiff [cf. C.I.C. can. 333 – § 1], who shall exercise the leadership authority over all of them [cf. C.I.C. can. 333 §2]. Priests have no such title, neither we theologians, we are called to serve and spread the teaching of the Church, we can correct it, even the masters of logica aletica they can do it, least of all the laity, given that the sheep of the flock can neither drive nor correct the pastor, pace of Roberto de Mattei to better inguaiare the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, years ago he stood a middle ground between a petition and referendum against a measure taken by the Roman Pontiff [cf. WHO], to which it is not possible to appeal or recourse [cf. C.I.C. can 333 §3]. If not, one does not fall even in Lutheranism, but at the worst Calvinism, in which the ordained ministerial priesthood does not exist, Consequently, where there, It should be considered as "a political invention of the Church".

This wholly issue raised in that text, processed with masterly and not a little confused artificiality, It is primarily devoid of a solid legal structure that makes for this logical devoid of common sense, even if one of the signatories priests aspires to be master of philosophy of common sense, referring, others like him, the best logical criteria and metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas. Therefore, the two Fathers de The Island of Patmos, They take note that these people have known and studied a Thomas Aquinas different from ours. Obviously, the authentic Aquinas, It is ours and not theirs, namely that for authentic logical and common sense teaches us between the lines of all its magna opera that give the heretic to the Supreme Pontiff, involves that fact be overt heretics and posters, con buona pace della logica aletica and the various supercazzole prematurate with scappellamento right [cf. WHO].

Having said that we pass to the charge, premise that it, if it were not tragic it would be comical: His Holiness has been publicly accused of seven heresies. E, as just explained above, it must be stressed that address a public formal accusation of heresy to the Supreme Guardian of the Holy deposit of the Catholic faith, It involves being heretics. Therefore, the signatories, have fallen into heresy substantial and formal.

In these days, Dominican theologian John Cavalcoli It is to preach the spiritual exercises to the cloistered nuns, and the precious ministry to which is fulfilling not allow him to devote himself to writing an essay on the issue at appropriate, But given our priestly and theological communion, combined with a mutual understanding very deep, I think I can speak on behalf of this distinguished papal academic, with which at the time I could deepen the most delicate aspects of metaphysics and dogmatic to the school of St. Thomas Aquinas.

If pushing several of the signatories reasons were more political than theological, the result was above all for having turned the faulty Pope Francis I in a victim vilified and insolentita in the worst way, played into the hands of those in its wake, or handling it with diabolical cleverness, They are destroying the Church through pastoral questionable choices and preposterous appointments of persons placed in all key posts of government of the Church [cf. WHO].

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos They can not charge of adulatory spirit towards the Supreme Pontiff, to which we have addressed many times a lot of hard and severe criticism, without ever losing sight for one moment that he is the stone through which, on the rock of Christ, the Incarnate Word of God built his church [among the many items, see WHO]. As proof of what I am not tacciabile of adulatory spirit, apart from my many writings published and available in the archive of all The Island of Patmos, I will only mention a few, for example one in which I wonder about the sanity of the Supreme Pontiff [cf. WHO], or that short essay in which I expressed a fear that a year ago today, to the test, It is proving to be anything but unfounded, Unfortunately! That is to say that "this pontificate likely to end up in the streets and whistles dramatic fracture ' [cf. WHO]. And when the reigning Pontiff will be - God forbid!, May! - took to the streets whistling, to defend him, at the cost of our skin, There we will, we were mistreated in the worst way by pimps his courtiers court of miracles, lanciatisi in large ecclesiastical career marked by poor&refugees and of existential suburbs various [cf. WHO], but ready to wear tomorrow like nothing had a magna hood of seven meters at the first change of wind [cf. WHO]. So I think I have all that freedom and, consequently, all the credibility that leads me to say in clear terms what I think: I fear more and more - may God grant me the grace to have absolutely wrong! - that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, continuing at this rate, You may run the risk of really go down in history as one of the worst popes that the Church has ever had. I do not like the way he porgersi, di parlare, make pastoral; I consider many of his acts steeped teaching of confused jumbles and especially not few ambiguities; I consider that very dangerous court of miracles the handful of thugs around him and deceives, is reopening in a sneaky way of questions dealt with and closed by his predecessors Supreme, which they are moreover, respectively, a Blessed and a Saint: from the diaconate to women [cf. WHO] the "reinterpretation" of Human life [cf. WHO]. But I never put, I never put in question his authority, whether it can be feared that go down in history as one of the worst Popes of the Church. A thought completely subjective, this mine, that does not in any way affect my faith in the Petrine ministry and my devout bestowed obedience person who actually carries it out in the Universal Church, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I.

Otherwise it would be inconsistent to say the least I proseguissi to exercise the sacred priesthood, for which he requested communion with the bishop in full communion with the Bishop of Rome, not the communion with what "I think". And I could not exercise sacred ministry because every day, the Body and Blood of Christ alive, during the celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice I recite these words with authentic faith: "Remember, Father of your Church throughout the earth, make us grow in love in communion with our Pope Francis, our Bishop ... ". Now, I do not know, the master of philosophy of common sense and supercazzole aletiche celebrating the Eucharistic Sacrifice like me, how it can, from the top of its smoky ego-theology, recite such words after signing a document in which it accuses the Roman Pontiff of seven heresies. But above all, I wonder how these words can recite that this bishop emeritus, inexorably trumpet in its spasmodic race to some of the largest and most prestigious Italian archiepiscopal sees, but mostly excluded from the dignity of cardinal, wandering from one living today to throw gasoline on the fire of these malcontents who feel disoriented - sometimes rightly -, by certain speeches or by certain ambiguous expressions of the reigning Pope. Perhaps this is the task of a bishop? And what about that theologian and liturgist, Today the whole liturgical tradition and defend the true doctrine, also more or less loose salottiero, che dieci anni fa, How long he was seventy years old and was hopeful in the race for the post of Archbishop secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, He would never even uttered a fart for physiological excess intestinal gas, even if the Pope had - for almost impossible hypothesis - set out to really heresy? Why these, miei cari Lettori, pernicious are the cowards who are behind the scenes, behind these signatories, that have been used by them so unscrupulous and evil as "useful idiots", to consume in this way, not the defense of the true faith and the true teaching, but to consume their revenge for the umpteenth career expectations to them not granted.

Let me be clear, not even the Blessed Apostolo Pietro was a saint, despite having been chosen by Christ in person. But above all it is worth recalling that the little saint became the first to die, through martyrdom, that was a grace granted by God and accepted by, after that even in old age was about to flee a second time along the Via Appia, also known as the way of "Whither goest thou, O? » [cf. WHO].

Now, things are in these terms: complain that The joy of love It is a badly written text and a harbinger of potential ambiguity, it is true, but assert that contain substantial heresies is false; a serious falsehood that makes heretics those who claim such wickedness.

In discussing among ourselves in the drafting of The Island of Patmos, our wise Dominican Sister Matilde Nicoletti was rightly noted that the allegations made and from which the signatories want to get heresies, does not stand. And together with our young philosopher and theologian Jorge Facio Lince, the three of us come to a conclusion consequential: these people are the same ones that attach to the Second Vatican Council, also because of the language used in his lyrics - undoubtedly new and not always happy compared to the consolidated metaphysical language of the Church [cf. WHO] ―, deviations and the resulting interpretations of the modernist theologians of the post-conciliar season. This analysis and distinction inability leads them always to say with blind fury that the post-council is actually generated by the real evil which is located upstream and, according to them, it is the Council, which also would be "only a pastoral council", as stated by the worthy priest and religious Father Serafino Lanzetta on the wrong trail lamented no less worthy and pious of Monsignor Brunero Gherardini. As if the Second Vatican Council, which has certainly not proclaimed the new dogma of faith, had not promulgated the new doctrines and reforms are and will remain binding on the whole universal Church.

To deny these people must just, though, before their blindness, It would serve little purpose the best logic, more or less aletica. To deny them and put them before their reasoning objectively idiot, It would be enough this simple question: at the time when the Roman Missal in use was that of St. Pius V, before the many priests who during five centuries badly celebrated, so hasty and sloppy Mass, It would be relevant, always after application of the same logic, It said that a large number of bad priests celebrated and without due devotion and veneration of the sacred mysteries, because it was the fault upstream, and he had to be sought whole, the bad drafting of the liturgical text promulgated by the Pope? Io credo che, subject to certain imperfections, then corrected as often happens in all the texts of the Church, Venerable Missal of St. Pius V, I myself always hold in high esteem, both it was prepared very well and that for five centuries has been - and still is - a priceless heritage of faith and liturgical piety that should not be lost in any way, in the same way in which, subject to some imperfections related to the expressive language does not always happy and fit, have been prepared very well the texts of Vatican Council II.

The heretic, schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay, with your signature on this document that accuses the reigning Pontiff seven heresies, has given a sound and deserved slap imprudent Francis I, who thought that, among the pastries offered tenderness and flavored cakes mercy, could sweeten concentrates bile as heretical followers located upstream: Marcel Lefebvre, giving example to his followers authority to administer the sacraments in a lawful [cf. WHO, WHO]. And these were then the resulting short rained results on the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, it tends not to listen to anyone. E, when listening to, It tends to listen to the wrong people …

The Supreme Pontiff may not be declared a heretic, let alone publicly accused of heresy. You should be aware of and accept the man's objective limits Jorge Mario Bergoglio, making him reach heartfelt prayer to publish as soon as possible by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, a statement that explains the teachings of The joy of love and to clarify the following points :

1) the reasons of the indissolubility of marriage;

2) the concept of “It was irregular” dei divorziati risposati;

3) if you are there and what are cases in which the divorced and remarried can receive Communion [cf. note 351];

4) power and authority of the natural moral law, ecclesiastical and divine;

5) l’oggettività, fallibility was excusable and the moral judgment of conscience;

6) the gravity of the sin of adultery;

7) how and why the divorced and remarried can be grace;

8) how can they be forgiven by God for their sins;

9) come, why and when the fault of the divorced and remarried can be attenuated;

10) che cosa significa “state of sin”;

11) what precise constraints creates the degree of doctrinal authority linked to the reception of the post-synodal apostolic exhortation The joy of love and its application.

The twenty-five pages of the text of signature, mostly secular, contain texts soaked objectively erroneous theories, but very processed at the technical level. It is therefore almost impossible that everything has been prepared independently by the simple lay faithful. The question is therefore the penalty: which prelates are hiding behind this, apart from the two mentioned earlier as an example during speech? Because, these prelates, instead go ahead lay not leave them in the open? They are all rhetorical questions, because we know how come out of the closet, It was explained above, but we repeat again: because many of them, even if you already get older, They have not yet resigned to seeing herself denied the cardinal. Probably hoping that the Pope Francis I make the soul to the Creator, and also only a few weeks before their, that moving with walker or wheelchair would reach before the Successor to be finally created cardinal. Why this, It is what only matters, not the salvation of one's soul, but the coveted red biretta, with which burn better in the eternal flames of Hell.

In this succession of events who more and more the characteristics of the game in the massacre and crossfire of snipers on the dwindling crowd of our faithful devotees, la domanda di rigore è: what are you doing, Of pleasure in pleasure, the Supreme Pontiff? Because unlike some commentators affected by devotion to one-way, to love and truly honor the Supreme Pontiff, we have to take him for what he really is, doing the accounts even with those limitations and defects that do not emerge from any certain newspaper article about Catholic, maybe think of limestone forever the crest, almost as if this pontificate would never end.

For this I am afraid that the Pope Francis I runs the serious risk of going down in history as one of the worst popes of the Church, as a humoral smiling tyrant in public but able to be inhumane in private, but always remaining, to the mystery of grace, the legitimate successor of Peter. And this is enough for me and I forward to say, along with one of my late lamented master of sound and orthodox Catholic doctrine, those words now, those who after his death would tirarselo from both sides, They are careful to say and report:

"If a bishop has a thought contrary to what the Pope has to go, but just you have to go by the diocese. Because lead the faithful on a road that is not what Jesus Christ. So lose himself forever and would risk eternal loss of the faithful " [video recording interview, WHO]..

That said Cardinal Carlo Caffarra of venerable memory, not failing to point out:

«[…] I would have had more pleasure that you say that the Archbishop of Bologna has a mistress rather than be told who has a thought contrary to that of the Pope ».

These last words, I wish they can serve as a warning to politicians hunters papal heresies, to whom, more than to say, I intimate with great clarity: write what you want in your newspapers and blogs of Vera&Extract Tradition, even accused the Pope Francis I of heresy for breakfast, lunch and dinner, but never Involve, to support some of your wickedness, the memory of that holy man of God Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, or you'll have to deal with Father John and me Cavalcoli, we're two pitt bull of God, we are not two barboncini toy from butter biscuits.

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra died with the spear of Longinus in the heart [cf. WHO e WHO], after a life offered to the highest and valuable services rendered to the Church and its Popes, without ever being received by the reigning Pontiff; the Pope himself but received atheists proud, Pentecostal heretics, grotesque arcivescove Lutheran declared lesbian, dictators two-bit, abortion and eutanasisti proud of their contempt for life and this indomitable and unrepentant … But he did not receive a true man of God, and his brother in the episcopate. What this certainly gives the pulse of touchiness and inhumanity inherent in man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that for some Vatican experts, however, is the most perfect of Christ himself. but yet, Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, true man of God, He died venerating the Holy Father and praying for him. And that this may be an example for all, about the increasingly also due to the worst obedience and veneration of the Successors of Peter; lesson worth, also and especially, for all hunters poisoned papal heresies.

from The Island of Patmos, 26 September 2017

Author
Recent Posts

father ariel

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )

The Antichrist and the prophecy of Vladimir Soloviev: yl S.O.S. Titanic and the Church runny peak …

24 September 2017/1 Comment/in Actuality/by father ariel

THE ANTICHRIST AND THE PROPHECY Vladimir Solovyov: IT S.O.S.. THE TITANIC AND THE CHURCH LEAKING A PEAK …

"But if you really want a rule, here's what I can tell: Be strong in faith, not for fear of sins, but because it is very nice for an intelligent man to live with God " [Vladimir Sergeevich Solov'ev, The three dialogues and the story of the Antichrist]

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

PDF print format article

Dear Readers,

if there's one thing that brings me deep discomfort are statements, often triumphal, sometimes complacent certain individuals who quote themselves debut: «… as I had said in advance just seeing », "As I wrote in the past then I am having reason". Before the test proved the facts, I must admit that certain strict analysis that I made on the future fate of the Church, written and published ten years ago, times and moments in which certain elements of our current affairs would be taken as a real science fiction, They were sadly true today. That said, however, I admit that my intention has always been to be wrong, then to write one day, with due honesty, that years ago I was wrong, writing certain things. Not in fact I take no pleasure in having been right, before the Church today like the Titanic sinking in the icy waters, while the orchestra continues to play and the people continued to dance in the ballroom of a steamer - wrote the British newspaper on the occasion of his first crossing - "even the wrath of God would have sunk". This is the spirit in which I propose again today, one of my first article published on The Island of Patmos In the 2014 [see archive, WHO].

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

a beautiful photographic image of St. John Paul II

In his second visit to Germany, Saint John Paul II said back in 1984: "... Today the world is experiencing the twelfth chapter of the Book of Revelation of the Apostle John». Statement that should lead us to a specific question: if the Holy Pontiff expressed thirty years ago in this way, today, which would be expressed in terms?

But as the facts show, it appears that from a bit’ of time in this part of the Augusti Pontiffs is easier to proclaim saints and blessed rather than listen to them and follow them, worshiping in them and in their supreme magisterium of the mystery and the dogma of the faith of the mandate given by the Word of God to Peter [cf. Mt 16, 14-18]. It is well known and common knowledge that make a nice canonization basically costs nothing. As it costs to set up foundations dedicated to St. John XXIII, San Giovanni Paolo II, to Blessed Paul VI. Some banks with a board of directors composed of Masons always happy to foraging barrel of money the irrepressible arrogance of some bishop and cardinal, in order to hit and destroy as much as possible from within the Church, around Italy is always, what seem rather scarce are bishops and cardinals that taking charge of all the dangerous risks involved agree to be lynched by the square no longer willing to listen and incorporate certain gospel messages. Or worse: to be torn apart within the same ecclesial world to have invited the increasingly dense army of modernists and heretics to put into practice what certain saints and blessed popes urged to practice through the acts of their teaching, written for the glory of God and for the salvation of man, not for the glory of man, that from century to century is able to use God as an excuse, his Church and all his saints to the glory of egocentrism.

Click on the image to listen to the waiver of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI with the translation of the Latin text

Today we have the media capable of transmitting images in real time, the memory of the ceremony of beatification, below that of John Paul II's canonization, should lead us to reflect, because they had never seen before until all the principal sources of degradation condition in which today the Church of Christ immortalized on television as stars to what they themselves called "big event", steeped in worldly clericalese and now devoid of adequate ecclesial languages. To celebrate the new Blessed and holy pontiff have so marched, in red and purple, on the catwalks of honor, even those on which rests the responsibility of having thrown the Bride of Christ on the sidewalk like a prostitute. The same because of which the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI will make withdrawal from the Petrine ministry a few years later, declaring no longer able, by age and lack of physical forces, to hold certain situations, which in other words is to say: the inability to source certain people, place that “situations” - if anything escapes someone - it means “people”, ie those who have generated such situations and which still hold the feet using the worst of the worst authoritarianism and harassment against those who dare to denounce evil just because they want to revive his beloved wife from the sidewalk where the scoundrels have thrown, certainly not for the useless pleasure to denounce evil end in itself.

Stoning of Saint Stephen, pictorial work of the sixteenth century.

At the ceremony of beatification of John Paul II, for real paradox linked as such to that mystery of evil that deceives us since the dawn of time, in practice hath witnessed this: … as if those who had assassinated the deacon Stephen throwing stones [CF. At 6, 8-12; 7, 54-60], a few years after they had declared protomartire, participating in first ahead of everyone to his beatification ceremony and extolling to newspapers, televisions and a swarm of Vaticanists without historical memory, the heroic virtues. And to think that many romantics believe that prostitutes are exercising their ancient craft only inside the brothel and not in the ecclesiastical buildings …

portrait of Vladimir Solovyov [Moscow, 16 January 1853 - Uzkoe, 31 July 1900]

Soloviev disappears in the early twentieth century, century in which he was leaning after living the nineteenth travails and prophesied a future of many Browse: philosophy, liberalism, modernism, communisms, psychoanalysis, sociologisms, theologians. He is therefore placed in the world of Belle Epoque, in years when the man was certainly the rise of a happy world, inspired by the new major thrusts of technological progress that sometimes comes to real forms of idolatry of technology; a technology in whose name often, modern thought, tried to evict the very idea of God from society. All shade oriented and inspired by the new religion of progress, the evangelical principle of charity patronage became emptied of feelings and supports metaphysical, in a safe world to march towards an era illuminated by the freedom of a new social security.

A copy of the old New York Times announcing the Titanic disaster

In the first decade of the twentieth century, the world was touched by an incident that shook public opinion: the sinking of the Titanic at inabissatosi 2.20 on the night of 14 and the 15 April of 1912 in temperate waters around zero degrees. Of 2.223 passenger 1.523 died dying for frostbite. All were equipped with life jacket and could have been saved thanks to the rescue, that when they arrived they could only collect hundreds of bodies floating in the icy waters. This disaster, considered the largest in the history of navigation, produced a copious literature, which hath then joined the cinematography.

click on the image to see the footage of the wreck

The Titanic was the expression of a man certain to dominate on the laws of nature, invincible and sure to give life to things indestructible, unassailable. Then there is a strong symbolic element, to quote a famous teacher and student who later became famous with his opponents: Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung: ice. This titan unsinkable and invincible created by a man self-proclaimed as invincible, It is not affected by the hot passion of the sun, but the ice, frost which had begun to create the modern man who can do without God. And while the masters of modern thought pushing locomotives to ice barriers, Soloviev do not let yourself be enchanted and announces in a lucid and prophetic evils that would be born by the metastases that man was putting into circulation; evils that then, the concrete evidence of the facts, one by one came true.

Lenin and Stalin, Soviet painting of the Fifties

Discoursing in 1880 According to the above speech Dostoevsky, it almost seems like that Soloviev intuit the brutality of Communism after the October Revolution of 1917 principieranno to affect humanity, giving the world a completely different attitude after the end of World War I. The man is depersonalized in social and political project of Real Socialism, becoming leading biblical humanity created in the image and likeness of God, anonymous cog victim of an ideology created in the image and likeness of a man socially and humanly corrupted, through which we come to known processes of dehumanization carried out by Lenin and especially Stalin.

Statue in San Michele Arcangelo elected patron of the Vatican City, desired by Pope Benedict XVI and then placed near the Palace of the Governorate, with the inscription below to Lucifer pierced by the lance: “And the gates of hell would not prevail“…

In his last publication, The three dialogues and the story of the Antichrist, [readable who] finished work on Easter Sunday of 1900, it is striking to note the clarity with which Soloviev It provides that the twentieth century will be the era of the last great wars, of strife and revolutions [CF. Ed. Marietti support. 184]. After that says that everything will be ready to lose meaning because the old structure into separate nations and disappear almost everywhere the last remnants of monarchical institutions [pag. 188]. We will then arrive to the Union of the United States of Europe [pag. 195]. It is indeed astonishing perspicacity with which Soloviev It describes the great crisis that hit Christianity in the last decades of the twentieth century, It portrayed by the Antichrist who will be able to influence and affect a bit 'all. In him, as is presented here, it is not difficult to see the emblem of the confused and ambiguous religiosity of these years our: he - followed narrate Soloviev - Will be a convinced spiritualist, an admirable philanthropist, a committed pacifist and diligent, a vegetarian looking, an animal determined and active. It Will Be, against the other, also an expert exegete: its culture will create a framework the biblical even a degree Honorary faculty of Tübingen. Above all, will prove an excellent ecumenist, able to communicate with words full of sweetness, wisdom and eloquence [pag. 211]. Against Christ will not in principle hostile [pag. 190]; indeed, I appreciate the high teaching. But it can bear - and therefore the censor - its absolute uniqueness [pag. 190]; and therefore does not resign to admit and to proclaim that he is risen and alive today.

The Three Dialogues and the Antichrist Stories published by Editrice Marietti

In these lines takes shape criticism Christianity of “values”, of the “openings” he was born in “dialogue”, where apparently remains little room for mystery of the person of the Word of God made Man, crucified and risen for us. Everything seems absorbed in molasses sentimental tenderness of vaporous. Of course, we have something to think, if we think of the militancy of faith reduced to a humanitarian socio-cultural; the Gospel message identified in comparison with irenic all philosophies and all religions; the Church of God mistaken for an organization of social promotion in which they multiply “events” built on strategies marketing. We are sure that Soloviev has not really expected what actually happened and that it is precisely the trap today's most threatening “holy nation” redeemed by the blood of Christ? It is a very disturbing question that for this should not be circumvented; and instead for this is rejected, sometimes violently, within the Church and outside the Church.

crimson one gets the impression that the world is on the brink of madness is too busy defending the “rights” the worst perversions proprinate by the culture of gender, to turn our gaze to a massacre of Christians in recent years has exceeded that of the early centuries of Christianity

Soloviev He has fully understood the twentieth century, perhaps we are that we did not understand him, or we do not want to understand for a reactive-defensive closure, so much so that he had not ever listened. This is demonstrated by many attitudes of many Christians today who consider themselves educated and engaged on the side of the Church, or who consider themselves “Christian adults”. Let's just think about the forms increasingly exasperated and exasperating of selfish individualism determinants our customs and our laws by which it is gradually subverted the natural order. You just need to analyze the “culture” the gender which is increasingly taking on the characteristics of a devastating dictatorship, with a lot of complaints in accordance with law and sentencing courts against persons recognized guilty of having expressed through freedom of thought and speech a peaceful dissent, considered but no more right to freedom of thought and speech but crime, if somehow touches the powerful mafia and social policy of the Sodomites, that already in most states have imposed protocols through which you teach “values” of the worst sexual perversions right from elementary schools, disguised under the false label of luciferin “right to diversity“. In some countries of decadent Europe - which now sick with hatred towards itself and from its Christian roots is gradually handing Islam -, Some say that the dished by certain powerful mafias of pederasts and lesbians with hate is a poisonous culture of death that will lead to the collapse, as has happened throughout history in many ancient civilizations sunk from glory to decline and therefore swept away, now likely to end up convicted of homophobia. To follow with pacifism often turned into violent pacifundism and the non-mutated violence often ideological aggression imbued with contempt for others.

The ideals of peace and fraternity I am no longer read in an evangelical key but Enlightenment and as such structured on Jacobin fury, ie in ideological anti-Christian, with the consequent result that the face of the aggression and to the worst bullying, many of our pastors end up giving weakly and running now to deal with masters of this world, or, like Esau, undersell the legitimate birthright for a plate of lentils [CF. Gen 25, 29-34], leaving without any defense the weak and the oppressed, in a particular way if they are Catholics and Christians persecuted for their faith, in the House of God and out of the House of God, because today, the worst persecution, are not those of the persecuted for the Church, but those who are persecuted inside the church at the hands of churchmen.

In all this lie some powerful strands of modern theology that, after having confused the absolute metaphysical concept understood as absolute faith, with the concept entirely different socio-political absolutism, have made a real de-construction and destruction of the dogma, after having undermined the concept of the absoluteness of faith by which Christ is for us the Word of God incarnate, dead has risen, and as such is the center of our present, our being and becoming future, then the ultimate goal of our entire eschatological humanism.

Of the series ” e you’ that m'envento pe’ rise ” – Father Geraldo Magela de Silva, priest of the Diocese of Pesqueira in Brazil, celebrates a Mass for the Masons who parade in the Parish of Our Lady of Conception, receiving the Eucharist and climb onto the presbytery with squares and compasses.

What to say about the theological virtue of Charity, the most important, as defined by St. Paul [CF. The Cor 13, 13], which gradually has replaced one of the most cherished concepts culture Masonic: solidarity? I will not repeat, and I will only refer to my article on Newspeak I speak the words emptied of their meaning and filled the other [see who], all in the wake of a tragedy today that sometimes seems irreversible: we have lost our language, which is the metaphysical, to meet not to “new words”, but meaningless concepts that undermine the foundations of our faith, who needs to express clear and precise words, a common vocabulary that allows us to seek perfection in unity [CF. GV 17, 20-21.23].

But what is the reality that many of our ecclesial bishops e cardinaloni pretend not to see, to avoid having to run for cover as soon as possible? Narrated by people like me who lives far from inside the Church's life as a member of the College of Priests, the bleak reality is this: if we put together three or four priests discover that each of them has a “his” language, a “its” ecclesiology, a “its” pastoral … and all this often ends result in a “its” doctrine. In one thing these priests will be united in a common element nefarious: in the spirit clerical, in malice clerks, because when it undermines and destroys the spirit of the Church it stands in its place the worst of the clerical spirit. If we take as a paradigm of the Diocese Diocese, that of Rome, Episcopal seat of the Chair of Peter, and we go around the parishes during the celebration of Holy Mass, for example by choosing ten randomly scattered around the Urbs, we find in them ten priests who celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice in ten different ways, Some also moved by the evident spirit of …”e mo’ that m'envento pe’ rise “? We fly over the whole of certain groups Neocatechumenal and charismatic that now have de facto “rites” own, including rites, animists and finished in syncretistic Catholic ritual; but we overlook the same way about certain so-called traditionalists, under which the number of those who “they adore” accidents outside of the sacred liturgy rather than substances immutable and eternal Memorial Vivo and Santo, is unfortunately very high. In short: sometimes seems to be in an open field without any possibility of shelter with grenades raining down from all sides.

If they were not clear results “mythical” and the sexual revolution “liberation” woman, here is an advertising company of designers Dolce&Gabbana in which simulates the rape of a woman authentic object of the XXI century, daughter of the woman finally “released” four decades before the wrath of feminist movements

After a sexual revolution who experienced a riot of selfishness that has not liberated women at all, but he really made “object” more than it has ever been historically and socially, and that has split the human sexuality from love, Novecento is finally reached such levels of institutionalized perversion that it is difficult to find equal historical adequate, even going to borrow the images of Sodom and Gomorrah, But that does not make the idea, especially not make “justice” the reality of our present.

The twentieth century was the century of oppressive history, no respect for human life and without mercy; and certain instincts now circulating for a century in the blood of the new generations not resolve cinetelevisivi invitations to tender, because the work that is required is much more complex, but especially more drastic, because it is based on a risk that you can not avoid running: not the pleasure to the masses and elites Power. Not to mention the true mercy, that correctly understood, implemented and practiced according to the Mystery of Revelation, exposed and summarized in numerous passages of the Gospels, Let us take only one among several:

"If your right eye to sin and cast it from you: fact you should lose one of your members, rather than your whole body be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, tagliala and gettala way of you: fact you should lose one of your members, rather than your whole body go into hell " [Mt 5, 29-30]

which wise doctor, will be so criminally “merciful”, to let the gangrene assail the whole body, instead of saving through amputation infected?

If within the Church Contemporary someone is convinced, however, that before a body beset by a devastating degenerative diabetes that caused gangrene in the foot, is instead very merciful not amputate, because it is not good to deprive a human being of a limb, in such a case is obvious: We prepare the inevitable consequence of gangrene that from there soon assail all the other limbs of the body.

The twentieth century was the century that witnessed the extermination of the Jews, that was not the only, although few remember the Armenian genocide at the turn of the First World War. No one commemorates the tens and tens of millions killed under the Soviet regime and few venture out to count the victims sacrificed in the various parts of the world communist utopia. In the course of this century has imposed on entire populations atheism State, while in Western secularized has spread atheism hedonistic and libertarian, until you get the idea of the grotesque “death of God”.

Vladimir Sergeevich Solov'ev

Soloviev he was a prophet and outdated teacher and unheeded, Long relegated to the visionary literature. In fact it was a passionate defender of man bashful with each philanthropy. He was a tireless apostle of peace and opponent of pacifism. Advocated unity among Christians and was harshly critical of each irenicism. He was in love with nature but totally detached from today's ecological infatuations, or to put it briefly: friend was in love with the revealed Truth of the Word of God and hostile enemy of every ideology and every socio-religious theology pseudo. These are the guides of which today we desperately need, together with the true mercy. We do not need, never a body infected with gangrenous limbs will be saved with the distilled water of the vaporous tenderness, nor with the mutated mercy mercy, because it is only with the great mercy of the scalpel, that a body suffering from gangrene can be saved …

from The Island of Patmos, 29 December 2014

Author
Recent Posts

Father Giovanni

Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )

Latest posts by Father Giovanni (see all)

The definition of the essence of man - 26 November 2018
Reflection moral honesty of language: the Church has always had its own clear and precise language - 11 November 2018
The Synod Youth: Enzo Bianchi and original sin in the context of a dissolution - 20 October 2018

Regarding the prohibition of contraception: it really opens the question on Humanae Vitae of Blessed Pope Paul VI ?

18 September 2017/4 Comments/in Actuality/by Father Giovanni

**ABOUT THE PROHIBITION OF BIRTH CONTROL: YOU REALLY REOPEN THE QUESTION ON HUMAN LIFE OF BLESSED PONTIFF PAUL VI ?**

The prohibition of contraceptives can admit exceptions? There may be cases in which it is permissible to use them? From the way he expresses the Blessed Pope Paul VI would seem that such exceptions or cases can not be allowed: "It is absolutely excluded as lawful way for birth control the direct interruption of the generative process'. but yet, Today we talk of reopening the question ...

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

PDF print format article
.

The Human life of the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, 1968. To open the text of the encyclical click WHO

... if what I tried to explain very clearly in my article, regarding the prohibition of contraception established by Human life of the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI - not excluding the necessary analysis of particularly serious circumstances that are almost always part of practice in absolutely exceptional cases -, He was to end aside to make room for other kinds of reasons based on relativism, mutability and therefore the rejection of the absoluteness and immutability of the moral law, before long we run the serious risk that some "theologians" open discussions on how the lawful abortion in some particular concrete cases, invoking the "reinterpretation" of categorical and absolute ban could have an abortion. They will do so by not explaining that certain so-called "concrete cases" submitted by them, They are always of the very few edge cases, if not unique. But above all, avoiding to explain that not even a borderline case, if not unique, those that border on the unbelievable at times, It can allow and justify in any way the suppression of an innocent human life. Because life is good not available, that it will always remain so immutable and absolute, even if today, to certain "theologians" and "doctors of moral", the words unchangeable e absolute cause states of true allergy. If this problem is linked to the theological world is to a certain pastoral bad did not subsist, it would never happen that in the year 2000, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith headed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, by the will and with the full support of St. Giovanni Paolo II, he was forced to remember and complain about what some "theologians" are annoyed by words such as "unique" and "absoluteness" of faith [following article …]

To open the ’ article click below

Giovanni Cavalcoli, O.P - «CONCERNING THE PROHIBITION OF CONTRACEPTION: YOU REALLY REOPEN THE QUESTION ON HUMAN LIFE OF BLESSED PONTIFF PAUL VI ? »
.

Author
Recent Posts

Father Giovanni

Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )

Latest posts by Father Giovanni (see all)

The definition of the essence of man - 26 November 2018
Reflection moral honesty of language: the Church has always had its own clear and precise language - 11 November 2018
The Synod Youth: Enzo Bianchi and original sin in the context of a dissolution - 20 October 2018

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra died crucified, as the crucified and the crucified

12 September 2017/1 Comment/in Actuality/by Father Giovanni

CARDINAL CARLO CAFFARRA DEAD CROSS, HOW THE CROSS AND THE CRUCIFIED

[…] in this case the Pope has run misbehaved, quite a lot of. The embrace of Carpi to Cardinal Carlo Caffarra was very little, also because it was a greeting of a few seconds, just the time it takes for a photograph, while the wound of this man of God remained. Cardinal Carlo Caffarra died crucified. On the contrary, let's explain better: he died as the Crucifix and with the Crucifix.

Properly religious pain is that which weeps or one's own sin or that of others. Nor does he grieve because this evil is struck by divine justice, ma, if you get sad, it does so for what is committed by human iniquity.

St. Leo the Great, Speech 95, 4-5, PL 54, 462-463

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

PDF print format article

a memory of Cardinal Carlo Caffarra by the television channel of the Archdiocese of Bologna, to open the video click on the image

We have lost a saint, a Holy Cardinal, honor and pride of the sacred college, that sacred college, which today unfortunately is wounded and troubled by modernist thrusts, which undermine its unity and functionality as the Pope’s support in governing the Church. It is that college of elected pastors who most closely help the Successor of Peter in his arduous apostolic office. The color of their dress, as Saint Catherine of Siena reminded them, it's red, symbolizing the blood of Christ, meaning that they must be ready to give their blood for the good of the Church. With Cardinal Carlo Caffarra we have lost a humble prince and a sturdy column of the Church, a man of God, luminary of moral theology, especially in the field of the sacrament of marriage and the family, therefore in the forefront to suffer the attacks and insults of the world and therefore despised, slandered and mocked by the modernists, exploited and vainly courted by the Lefebvrians, delighted, listened to and imitated by good Catholics, living of that "continuity in progress", which was the maximum delivery to the Church made by another great spiritual guide: Benedict XVI.

And he always in the breach, with indomitable firmness, until the very end, because it is founded on a solid doctrinal preparation and even more on a warm and enlightened faith, certainly not that of Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini always in irresolvable discussion with the "interior" atheist.

"Mercy and conversion", a lecture by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, held in Ancona on 30 May 2016, to open the video click on the image

Regarding the personality of Carlo Caffarra, we talked about intelligence, culture, honesty, love for the Church, pastorality. All true. But in my opinion, the true heart of his spirituality, is testified by some episodes of his life, where love is intertwined with pain. With Saint Paul, he has been able to say and still tells us: "There is no other boast for me than in the cross of Our Lord Jesus Christ" [Gal 6,14].

Like Father Ariel that two days ago preceded this memory of mine on The Island of Patmos with a memory of her [cf. WHO], I too can testify to having known Cardinal Carlo Caffarra very well. There was mutual esteem and friendship between us, which drew occasion and stimulus from four factors: first, having been my bishop until 2012, that is, as long as I lived in the Convent of Bologna; second, having been my Superior as Chancellor of the Theological Faculty of Bologna, where I taught until 2011, when I became emeritus; third, having been appointed by him as an exorcist of the diocese; bedroom, having been, until the end of his episcopal mandate, Judge of the Diocesan Tribunal for the Cause of Beatification of the Servant of God Father Tomas Tyn, diocesan inquiry in which, until the 2013, I have carried out the function of vice-postulator.

homily of Cardinal Carlo Caffarra in the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter in 2013, during the Year of Faith, to open the video click on the image

On the occasion of a visit to the Cardinal in 2012, linked to my office as vice-postulator, he told me with emotion that since he was a seminarian he loved to make frequent pilgrimages on foot, starting from Busseto, his hometown, a few kilometers away, up to the Sanctuary of the Madonna del Rosario in Fontanellato, near Parma, directed by the Dominicans. Carlo Caffarra lived his life in the light of Mary and when he was promoted from the suffragan see of Ferrara to the metropolitan archbishopric of Bologna, from then on his devotion to the Virgin of San Luca was fervent.

I would like to mention three important episodes of his activity as pastor as bishop and cardinal. Despite their diversity, all three are linked by a red thread: Sante, opportune and noble initiatives, PREPARATIONS, initiated and conducted with righteous intention, competence, wisdom and courage, from which Carlo Caffarra had the right to expect much for the good of his diocese and the Church and the spread of the Gospel, and yet all three blocked and frustrated not only by obstacles coming from outside the Church, but above all from the inside, even by the higher authority.

Carlo Caffarra appeared to some as a loser, as Father Ariel wrote recently making a subtle reference to "we Christological failures" [cf. WHO]. And perhaps he appeared defeated to a modernist like Andrea Grillo [1], who painted him between the lines as a man overcome by history. but yet, since the cause of Carlo Caffarra was just - indeed sacrosanct -, history will prove him right, and Grillo will be shamed, while from now on the holy Cardinal finds himself triumphant over his enemies in celestial glory, to which he ascended for having been a faithful servant of Christ.

"I would have been more pleased if it were said that the Archbishop of Bologna has a mistress, instead of saying that he is against the Pope ", from an interview with Tv2000, to open the video click on the image

The three salient episodes of his life I'm: first, the deposition as Secretary of the Pontifical Institute for Studies on Marriage and the Family by St. John Paul II in 1984; second, the obstacles posed by ecclesiastical authorities to the proceeding of the diocesan investigation relating to the Cause of Beatification of the Servant of God Father Tomas Tyn, which was approved, officially open and supported by the Cardinal; third, the refusal of the reigning Pontiff to answer the now famous dubia and to receive him at the hearing. Now vwe will be as behind all three of these episodes, which at first might give the impression of not full consonance with the Church and the Supreme Pontiff, actually they, if well considered and evaluated with the right criteria, instead they show the figure of a Catholic all in one piece, very faithful to sound doctrine, excellent in Christian witness, learned and wise, mirror of Christ crucified, splendid example of a shepherd and educator, especially of young people, in full communion with the Church and the Pope, about which a few years ago, to counteract the evil voices, he said with boyish candor that he was a papist from birth, he was then and he would be until his death. Man also gifted with elegant humor, who did not hesitate to answer: "I would prefer it to be said that the Archbishop of Bologna has a lover, rather than saying that he is against the Pope " [cf. video interview WHO].

So let's start with the first episode and precisely from the antecedents. In the Church Carlo Caffarra chose, in his capacity as moralist and pastor, to devote himself, preferably to in-depth analysis, in full communion with the doctrine of the Church, of the study of the sacrament of marriage - great mystery [Ef 5,32] - in all its liturgical aspects, spiritual, humans, morals, psychological, sociological, canon law, civil and educational.

Rome Life Forum 2017, intervention by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, news agency Correspondence Romana, to open the video click on the image

In this field it gained prestige and international fame. For this St. John Paul II, another great Master in this delicate and important subject, he named it, at just forty-three years old, In the 1981, at the head of the Pontifical Institute for Studies on Marriage and the Family [cf. WHO]. The good Carlo Caffarra, mild character and confident in the goodness of others, perhaps he did not realize the terrible and insidious war zone in which the Successor of Peter had placed him. But he left confident, strong in his faith and his solid preparation. But here's the power of darkness, concealed both inside and outside the Church, he was preparing a treacherous ambush for him. In 1984 was interviewed by a reporter, who asked him what he thought of abortion. And he, with all candor, with simplicity, clarity and sincerity, according to the dictates of the natural law and the precept of faith, without imagining what would happen, he answered calmly as usual: "Abortion is murder!». E sthus the storm broke out: something like 450 "Catholic" theologians, actually modernists, what Blessed Paul VI had already called the "parallel magisterium", they were unleashed not against poor Caffarra, but against the Pope, with hot accusations of being a medieval tyrant, in groups of 40, 50, 60 theology, from various European countries, several of which, in the following years, raised to episcopal dignity. Belgium began, to follow one after the other with other countries of past Catholic tradition: in Germany, Holland, France, Spain, and finally Italy, which acted as a "tail light", as my head office Monsignor Tommaso Mariucci commented, at the time I was working as a theological consultant at the Secretariat of State of His Holiness. What did he do, in that circumstance, the Supreme Pontiff? He removed Carlo Caffarra from office. Some in the Secretariat of State commented: “It hurt, he had to leave it in its place!». But Carlo Caffarra received a terrible wound in any case. It was a frightening test for him and, which probably upset and pained him even more, received from a Holy Pontiff, who also esteemed him, and to which if there was something that was really close to his heart, it was just the family. He must have felt all the mockery and triumph of the modernists fall upon him like a boulder. He must have felt treated with immense ingratitude for all the commitment he had lavished in that delicate office and probably had to have the impression of surrender to the laughing enemies of the Church. Why ever please them, rather than rewarding and confirming the faithful servant?

Carlo Caffarra «Marriage, Eucharist, Communion", 20 March 2014, by the television channel of the Archdiocese of Bologna, to open the video click on the image

In the history of holiness, in truth, there are other cases of this kind, in which a saint, without knowing or without wanting, or simply because deceived by malicious subjects or because they are badly advised by others, does a grave wrong to another saint. But he remained silent, he did not defend himself, he didn't protest, continued in his moral uprightness, prayed and offered to the Lord. Only after long years on this line of holiness was he able to heal, a rasserenarsi, increasing his pastoral commitment, until St. John Paul II, In the 1995, he appointed him Bishop of Ferrara. Eight years passed, In the 2003 he promoted it to the metropolitan archbishopric of Bologna, the learned and the pleasure-seeker. In 2006, Benedict XVI created him a Cardinal.

Second episode, the Cause of Beatification of Tomas Tyn. I am not here to remember the figure of this holy and learned Dominican theologian, of Czech origin, dead to 39 years in 1990, lived in the convent of Bologna since 1972 until his death and lecturer in the Dominican Theological Study in Bologna. Father Tomas, of which you can visit the two sites [WHO e WHO], is well known to the readers of The Island of Patmos and now known in the Catholic world.

opening of the beatification process of Father Tomas Tyn, Bologna 25 February 2006, introductory speech by Father Giovanni Cavalcoli in the presence of the Metropolitan Archbishop of Bologna Carlo Caffarra, to open the video click on the image

Carlo Caffarra admired Tomas Tyn, as well as for its virtues, also for his theological wisdom, and in it he saw a guide in the search for God and in the foundation of moral values, to remedy the errors of our time. He had guessed well, as well as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger himself wrote to Father Tyn [2], how important it was, following the best Dominican tradition, give ground, justification and certainty to moral assertions with a solid philosophy and theoretical theology. And here rI remember some significant words of the Metropolitan Archbishop of Bologna Carlo Caffarra, with which, In the Decree of Introduction of the Cause of 2006 praises the Servant of God for his fidelity to the doctrine of St. Thomas Aquinas and notes how:

«[…] today his beatification and canonization is requested by many people who keep alive the memory of his virtues and fame of holiness already recognized by many, when he was among us " [3].

From the 2 al 3 December 2011, at the Convent of San Domenico in Bologna, an international conference was held organized by the Cenacolo di San Domenico Association of Bologna, from the theme "The figure and thought of Father Tomas Tyn" [4]. Cardinal Carlo Caffarra opened the proceedings with a short speech, in which he reiterated his high esteem for the Servant of God as an exemplary faithful theologian, because Thomist, to the Magisterium of the Church.

Prolusion by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra on the thought of Father Tomas Tyn, Tele Radio Good Advice, December 2011. To open the video click on the image

For Carlo Caffarra, the Cause of Father Tyn it was therefore a source of pride for his diocese, an Archdiocese like Bologna, ancient and prestigious university seat, in which the main philosophical currents of our time meet and clash. The dynamic and incisive presence of Father Tomas in this complex and difficult environment provided support and defense for the Archbishop's pastoral care in the cultural and theological field.

At the same time, Tomas Tyn he spared no criticism of modernist tendencies, secularists, Liberals, Marxist, you laicized, Masonic idealists, Protestants and existentialists present in the composite Bolognese culture, of which some infiltration was not absent even among his colleagues in the Theological Study, then called STAB (Bolognese Academic Theological Study).

Even in this enterprise the Cardinal was hindered, to the point that in the 2013 the diocesan investigation had to temporarily suspend his regular work, due to an intervention of authority evidently hostile to the Servant of God, incompetent and illegitimate intervention piloted from outside the diocesan court, who suspended the vice-postulator from his office, so that this office, still later 5 year old, it is still vacant, although until the time of suspension in 2013 the court had not found any facts or irregularities so serious as to justify the suspension of the vice-postulator's activity.

Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p. presents the figure of Tomas Tyn in Ferrara in March of 2011, to open the video click on the image

More pain and humiliation for Carlo Caffarra, who, in finding an interference in his functions as Judge of the Court, he gave up asserting his right, but we can imagine that on this occasion too he found consolation in the Cross. During the visit I made to him and which I spoke about earlier, having asked him if, even after the dismissal of the vice-postulator, he continued to be in favor of the Cause of Father Tomas Tyn, mi said: "And". Then, sitting as he was next to me, bowed his head in his hands, he was silent for a minute and said to me very seriously: "I can't understand why your Order's hostility towards him".

In the years following the 2013 until today, de facto, on a mandate from the General Postulation of the Dominican Order, the former vice-postulator continues unofficial work for the Cause, also with reference to the existence mentioned by the Decree of the numerous devotees of the Servant of God, especially in Italy and the Czech Republic [5], who maintain an interest in the thought and life of Father Tomas, they study his writings and imitate his examples, they defend it from criticism and deepen its thinking, continue to show up, they wait and pray for the resumption of the process.

“Faith and culture in the face of marriage”, conference held in April 2015 from Cardinal Carlo Caffarra to the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, to open the video click on the image

Third great cross of Cardinal Carlo Caffarra was the tormented story of the dubia. Once again, a pain that came to him from the Pope, his, that if there was a man on earth who since he was a child was for him the object of his tender trust and the guarantor of his absolute security, this was precisely the Roman Pontiff. And the tremendous test had to be about that great mystery to which he had dedicated the main part of his studies, of his interests, of his publications: marriage and family. He had already suffered from this in 1984: now it was his turn to be crucified again. Even now, again, i lazzi, the derisions, the slander.

Not that his faith faltered under the authority of the Supreme Pontiff Francis I. Not even talking about this. But in his eyes there love joy it contained ambiguous passages, they needed to be clarified by the Pope, by virtue of his authority, also because in fact, around those steps, an enormous discord was unleashed, still not sedated. The Pope had to reiterate the dogma of marriage with unequivocal clarity.

But why the Pope did not answer? How come it didn't reassure him? This was his distress. Moreover, Caffarra's attitude was very different from that of Card. Raymond Burke. He illegitimately spoke of "correcting the Pope". Caffarra has never dreamed of presenting such irreverence. Evidently the two have interpreted i in the opposite sense dubia, although they have formulated them together.

meditation by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra on the value of martyrdom in a sick Christianity, April 2015, to open the video click on the image

Realizing the exploitation to which the dubia, he took care to make this moving declaration of fidelity to the Successor of Peter: "I wish to renew my absolute dedication and my unconditional love to the Chair of Peter and for your august person, in which I recognize the Successor of Peter and the Vicar of Jesus: the “sweet Christ on earth”, as Saint Catherine of Siena loved to say " [cf. WHO]. But what hurt him was the Pope's failure to respond, for a long time waiting, which was followed - further wound - by the refusal to receive him at the hearing. Here the Pope behaved badly, quite a lot of. Carpi's embrace was very little, also because it was a greeting of a few seconds, just the time it takes for a photograph. While the wound, to Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, remained.

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra died crucified. On the contrary, let's explain better: he died as the Crucifix and with the Crucifix.

Varazze, 9 September 2017

_________________________

NOTE

[1] See our refutations of the accusations and arguments - if we can speak of "arguments" and not rather of insults - by Andrea Grillo against Caffarra published on this site. The Cardinal was grateful to us for this defense brought forward by me and Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo on The Island of Patmos, see the following articles: WHO, WHO, WHO.

[2] Text of the letter in my book: Father Tomas Tyn. A traditionalist post-conciliar, Editions Faith&Culture, Verona 2007, p.129.

[3] Full text of Decree in my mentioned book, pp.147-149.

[4] The proceedings of the conference were published in the single issue of sacred Doctrine, entitled "Tomas Tyn", edited by G.Cavalcoli, n.2, 2013.

[5] But also in other countries, as for example in the United States, in France, in Germany, in Spain, in Brazil, in Mexico, in Argentina, in the Philippines.

Author
Recent Posts

Drafting

The editors of The Island of Patmos
Editorial Articles

( Click on the name to read all the articles )

We dropped into the home an enemy that we hang you with ropes that the Church and the European states have provided: a historical reflection, social and theological on the Islamic faith

1 September 2017/13 Comments/in Theologica/by Drafting

— Theologica —

WE DRAGGED IN HOUSE AN ENEMY THAT hang you ROPES WITH THE CHURCH AND THE EUROPEAN STATES HAVE PROVIDED: HISTORICAL REFLECTION, SOCIAL AND THEOLOGICAL ON ISLAMIC FAITH

Unfortunately, it pains us to admit it, with some very imprudent gesture, the Holy Father delivered, the new invaders of Europe now in an irreversible phase of de-Christianization, house keys. While in, to us, in this situation irreversible and without human possibility of return, we just have to wait for the opening of the Seventh Seal according to the account contained in the Apocalypse of Blessed Apostolo Giovanni.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

YOU CAN BUY THE BOOK BY CLICKING: WHO

.
.
«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

NOTEBOOKS AND NOTEBOOKS

BUY NOW

€28,00

BUY NOW

DIGRESSIONS OF A LIBERAL PRIEST

€18,00

BUY NOW

SATIRICAL CATTLEQUIRES

€22,00

BUY NOW

THE SADNESS OF LOVE

€18,00

BUY NOW

WAR AND IDEOLOGICAL PROPAGANDA

€28,00

SATAN AND BECAME TRINO

BUY NOW

€30,00

BITTER HERBS

BUY NOW

€18,00

ARIANISM

BUY NOW

€22,00

THE ASPIRINE OF MODERATE ISLAM

BUY NOW

€22,00

THE CHURCH AND THE CORONAVIRUS

BUY NOW

€24,00

Nothing trouble you

BUY NOW

€18,00

PIUS XII AND THE SHOAH

BUY NOW

€25,00

Sect Neocatechumenal

BUY NOW

€18,50

THE SIGN OF CAIN

BUY NOW

€20,00

FROM PROZAN TO PROZAC

BUY NOW

€22,00

THE WAY OF THE THREE KEYS

BUY NOW

€24,00

THE GOLPE OF THE POLITICALLY CORRECT

BUY NOW

Popular

The Sacrament of Marriage by Father Gabriele Giordano...13 May 2023 - 12:26
It is being distributed “Sadness of Love”, ultima...30 August 2022 - 15:24
The anti-covid vaccines19. That moral and that Christian charity ...29 July 2021 - 22:08
ANNOUNCEMENTS! "The sect Neocatechumenal. Heresy became ....15 September 2019 - 20:09
from the large “Sabrina” played by Audrey ...15 October 2019 - 19:16
Once upon a time there were the Eucharist and the Priesthood ...28 March 2019 - 0:54
I Neocatecumenali, to conquer Asia thanks ...31 July 2019 - 22:31
The Motu Proprio of Benedict XVI on the Mass is abolished..7 May 2020 - 19:27
Eventually it was discovered. The ghost-writer of the Supreme Pontiff ...16 July 2021 - 15:28
"Fideism idiot in power" … God save us from the ...30 March 2020 - 14:53

Recent

The Sacrament of Marriage by Father Gabriele Giordano...13 May 2023 - 12:26
It is being distributed “Sadness of Love”, ultima...30 August 2022 - 15:24
"Something is changed". From Jack Nicholson to the Cardinal...14 April 2024 - 12:32
The Church is the daughter of the first hesitant disciples13 April 2024 - 23:33
The Devil among crime news, itching and reality in the 202410 April 2024 - 23:03
“Blessed are we” which despite not having seen we have....6 April 2024 - 23:47
The fear of women: «They took the Lord away...31 March 2024 - 12:41
Holy thursday 2024. A greeting homily from the Cardinal...30 March 2024 - 18:49
We inform the Archbishop of Chieti-Vasto that the priest...22 March 2024 - 12:42
Better for a single man to die than for an entire nation to perish..17 March 2024 - 9:31

Comments

Donate

Dear Readers.

This magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

THE MAGAZINE OF THIS SITE AND THE ISSUES TAKE NAME FROM THE ISLAND AEGEAN IN WHICH THE BLESSED APOSTLE JOHN He WROTE THE BOOK OF REVELATION, ISLAND ALSO KNOWN AS

« PLACE THE LAST REVELATION »

"God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»

(in the highest of the other way, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)

The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma

Creator and editor of this magazine website:

MANUELA LUZZARDI

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

CORRECTION ON BRANCH: "And JESUS ​​SAID TO WOMEN rinsed CLOTHS NEAR THE LAKE: “ Give up SOCKS AND UNDERWEAR AND FOLLOW! I WILL I WILL WASHING OF MEN“ »

POPE Heretic, ANTONIO LIVI AND THE PATCH THAT ENDS WITH BE THE WORST RIP, THE TRAGEDY OF INTELLECTUAL PRIDE

A POPE Heretic? THE BLIND OF foolishness'PARTY OF BERGOGLIANI »: TO PROTECT THE POPE FRANCIS AND WITH HIM THE MINISTRY PETRINE, YOU MUST PUT IN LIGHT ALSO MANY DEFECTS, INSTEAD sing "OSANNA, OSANNA IN THE OF HEAVEN !"TREAT AND HOW WAS THE MOST PERFECT CHRIST

THE ANTICHRIST AND THE PROPHECY Vladimir Solovyov: IT S.O.S.. THE TITANIC AND THE CHURCH LEAKING A PEAK …

ABOUT THE PROHIBITION OF BIRTH CONTROL: YOU REALLY REOPEN THE QUESTION ON HUMAN LIFE OF BLESSED PONTIFF PAUL VI ?

CARDINAL CARLO CAFFARRA DEAD CROSS, HOW THE CROSS AND THE CRUCIFIED

WE DRAGGED IN HOUSE AN ENEMY THAT hang you ROPES WITH THE CHURCH AND THE EUROPEAN STATES HAVE PROVIDED: HISTORICAL REFLECTION, SOCIAL AND THEOLOGICAL ON ISLAMIC FAITH

<img decoding="async" class="alignnone" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/numero.visite3.jpeg?resize=400%2C285&#038;ssl=1" alt="" width="400" height="285" data-recalc-dims="1" data-eio="l" />

CORRECTION ON BRANCH: "And JESUS SAID TO WOMEN rinsed CLOTHS NEAR THE LAKE: “ Give up SOCKS AND UNDERWEAR AND FOLLOW! I WILL I WILL WASHING OF MEN“ »

**ABOUT THE PROHIBITION OF BIRTH CONTROL: YOU REALLY REOPEN THE QUESTION ON HUMAN LIFE OF BLESSED PONTIFF PAUL VI ?**